This issue features one Perspective article, one Guideline, four Review Articles, four Original Articles, one Case Report, one Procedure and one Letter to the Editor. In the Perspective, Nishizawa et al. (Matsumoto, Japan) focused on female urology. They described self-tailored mesh in the transvaginal mesh technique for the repair of vaginal prolapse, together with an interesting case. The Guideline is reported by Fujioka et al. (Morioka, Japan). The Japanese Urological Association (JUA) originally published the clinical guideline for renal cell carcinoma in 2007. This time, JUA updated and published the revised version of the guideline in 2011. In this article, they described the main revision points, such as clinical questions. As for the Review Articles, the first Review is on the biology of testicular germ cell tumors. Okamoto (Otsu, Japan) summarized recent research regarding the epigenetics of the tumors in explaining the biological and clinical characteristics of the tumors. The second Review by Kawashima and Nakatani (Osaka, Japan) was on estrogen receptors in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. They summarized the recent data providing evidence for estrogen signaling in the prostate; in particular, the direct action of estrogens through estrogen receptors on prostate cells, including cancer cells. They also discussed estrogen receptor targeted therapy for BPH and prostate cancer. The third Review regards stress urinary incontinence by Yoshimura and Miyazato (Pittsburgh, PA, USA and Okinawa, Japan). They focused on the recent advances in the neurophysiological mechanisms of the lower urinary tract, and discuss the potential targets for pharmacotherapy of stress urinary incontinence. The fourth Review by Shiraishi et al. (Yamaguchi, Japan) is about varicocele in male infertility. They reviewed the pathophysiology of the varicocele, and discussed the indication of varicocelectomy in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Four interesting Original Articles appear in this issue. One is on the prediction of the complication risk of partial nephrectomy. Kong et al. (Shanghai, China) retrospectively analyzed preoperative images and clinical records of 195 renal tumor patients. They reported that preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomical classification predicted the risk of overall complications in patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery. As an Original Article, Sugihara et al. (Tokyo, Japan) reported the characteristics and the therapeutic trends of renal trauma in Japan using a nationwide database. They analyzed 1505 renal trauma cases and they reported that angioembolization failure is not rare, and nephrectomy is still an effective last resort. Neuropeptides and their signaling effects are known to be one of the potent growth stimulators for several cancers. As an Original Article, Tsapakidis et al. (Larissa, Greece) reported the effect of a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, in neuropeptides signaling stimulation on prostate cancer cells. They showed that bortezomib blocked the neuropeptide and induced the cell-proliferative and antiapoptotic signaling. Kadekawa et al. (Okinawa, Japan) reported, as an Original Article, the effect of the antimuscarinic agent, propiverine hydrochloride (propiverine), on the bladder and urethra in rats. The mechanism by which antimuscarinic agents improve stress incontinence has not yet been clarified. They concluded that an increase of catecholamines after propiverine treatment might activate smooth muscle of the proximal urethra α1A and α1D adrenergic receptors, as well as activating urethral and pelvic floor striated muscle through the spinal motoneurons. One interesting Case Report and one surgical Procedure also appear in this issue. Atsuta et al. (Kyoto, Japan) reported a case of bilateral idiopathic segmental ureteritis successfully treated by steroid therapy. In the Procedure, Orikasa et al. (Miyagi, Japan) described suprapubic cystostomy drainage after radical prostatectomy, and suggested that urethral catheter-free prostatectomy is a good alternative to that with a urethral Foley catheter. One Letter to the Editor regards population screening for prostate cancer by Van Meerhaeghe and Velkeniers (Brussels, Belgium). None declared.