Cumulative Overall Survival Rates Research Articles

Pathological Pleural Invasion is a Risk Factor for Late Recurrence in Long-Term Survivors of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Complete Resection.

Information regarding late recurrence after pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors for late recurrence after surgery for NSCLC in the current era. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent complete resection for pathological I-III NSCLC between 2006 and 2015. Late recurrence was defined as a recurrence that met the following conditions: (1) the patient underwent chest computed tomography (CT) at or after 54 months after surgery and recurrence was not detected at that time, and (2) recurrence that occurred more than 5 years after surgery. The factors influencing late recurrence, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) after surgery were analyzed. A total of 1275 with 5-year relapse-free survival after surgery were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 66.4 years and 54% of the patients were men. The median interval between surgery and the latest follow-up examination was 98 months. In total, 35 patients (2.7%) experienced late recurrence and 138 patients have died thus far. The cumulative recurrence, RFS, and OS rates at 10 years were 3.9%, 84.9%, and 86.3%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that pleural invasion was an independent risk factor for late recurrence. Pleural invasion was a poor prognostic factor for both RFS and OS. Pleural invasion was a predictor of late recurrence. Age>67 years, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)>5 ng/ml, non-adenocarcinoma, and pleural invasion were poor prognostic factors for RFS.

Oncological outcomes after a pathological complete response following total neoadjuvant therapy or chemoradiotherapy for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer in the RAPIDO trial

BackgroundA pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiation (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (scRT) leads to a favourable prognosis in patients with rectal cancer. Total neo-adjuvant therapy (TNT) doubles the pCR rate, but it is unknown whether oncological outcomes remain favourable and whether the same characteristics are associated with pCR as after CRT. MethodsComparison between patients with pCR in the RAPIDO trial in the experimental [EXP] (scRT, chemotherapy, surgery, as TNT) and standard-of-care treatment [STD] (CRT, surgery, postoperative chemotherapy depending on hospital policy) groups. Primary and secondary outcomes were time-to-recurrence (TTR), overall survival (OS) and association between patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics and pCR. ResultsAmong patients with a resection within six months after preoperative treatment, 120/423 (28%) [EXP] and 57/398 (14%) [STD] achieved a pCR. Following pCR, 5-year cumulative TTR and OS rates in the EXP and STD arms were 8% vs. 7% (hazard ratio 1.04, 95%CI 0.32–3.38) and 94% vs. 93% (hazard ratio 1.41, 95%CI 0.51–3.92), respectively. Besides the EXP treatment (odds ratio 2.70, 95%CI 1.83–3.97), pre-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) <5, pre-treatment tumour size <40 mm and cT2 were associated with pCR. Distance from the anal verge was the only characteristic with a statistically significant difference in association with pCR between the EXP and STD treatment (Pinteraction=0.042). pCR rates did not increase with prolonged treatment time. ConclusionsThe doubled pCR rate of TNT compared to CRT results in similar oncological outcomes. Characteristics associated with pCR are the EXP treatment, normal CEA, and small tumour size.

Impact of Sarcopenia on Prognosis in Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization: A Single Center Retrospective Study.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of sarcopenia on primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 265 patients diagnosed with HCC who underwent TACE between April 2014 and February 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: the sarcopenia group (n=133) and the non-sarcopenia group (n=132). The study analyzed the differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier curves. The independent risk factors for OS and PFS were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Based on these factors, the study constructed a prognostic risk grading system. Results: At 3 and 6 months post-TACE, the prognoses of the sarcopenia group were worse than that of the non-sarcopenia group according to the mRECIST criteria. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the cumulative OS and PFS rate in the non-sarcopenia group were significantly higher compared to the sarcopenia group (HR=3.319, 95%CI: 2.283-4.824, Log-rank P < 0.001; HR=0.631, 95%CI: 0.486-0.820, Log-rank P < 0.001). Sarcopenia, maximal tumor diameter, and AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL were independent risk factors for OS and PFS. The prognostic risk grading system based on sarcopenia, AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL, and maximal tumor diameter≥8.9 cm showed significant differences in prognosis between risk groups. Conclusion: Sarcopenia had excellent predictive value for OS and PFS in patients after TACE, and AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL and maximal tumor diameter were also independent risk factors for a poor prognosis. The prognostic risk grading system based on sarcopenia, AFP, and maximal tumor diameter had good guiding value for the prognosis of patients.

Chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus 125I brachytherapy for the second-line treatment of locally recurrent cervical cancer after/with radical treatment: A propensity score analysis

Rationale and objectivesThe primary aim of this study was to conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of the survival outcomes in patients with recurrent cervical cancer (CC). Specifically, we aimed to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy alone versus the combined approach of chemotherapy and 125I brachytherapy subsequent to the failure of initial chemotherapy treatment. Materials and methodsPatients diagnosed with recurrent CC subsequent to the failure of initial chemotherapy from January 2007 to December 2016 were enrolled from 2 hospitals. These patients were then divided into two groups: Group A, which underwent second-line chemotherapy alone, and Group B, which received both second-line chemotherapy and 125I brachytherapy. The assessment of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was carried out through propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1), Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression for survival analysis. ResultsA matched cohort comprising 88 patients each in Group A and Group B was included in the study. In Group A, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative PFS rates were 40.9 %, 15.9 %, and 5.7 % respectively, while in Group B, these rates were significantly higher at 79.5 %, 48.9 %, and 25.0 % (P = 0.003). Similarly, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative OS rates among Group A were 67.0 %, 27.3 %, and 5.7 % compared to 89.8 %, 63.6 %, and 30.7 % among Group B, suggesting a difference with statistical significance (P < 0.001) between the two groups. Moreover, the incidence of complications was similar between groups (P = 0.698). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the combined approach of chemotherapy and 125I brachytherapy yields superior therapeutic effects but similar complication rates compared to chemotherapy alone in patients experiencing local recurrence of CC following failed initial chemotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation Assisted by Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers with a Diameter of 3-7 Cm.

To investigate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) assisted by ultrasound fusion imaging (FI) for primary and secondary liver cancers with a diameter of 3-7 cm. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with primary and secondary liver cancers (3-7 cm) who underwent MWA with ultrasound FI assistance in our hospital from April 2020 to May 2022. Technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), major complication, intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR), and overall survival (OS) were assessed during the follow-up period. In addition, the ablation results of tumors between the medium-sized group (3.1-5.0 cm) and large-sized group (5.1-7.0 cm) were compared. 31 patients with 35 primary and secondary liver cancers were treated with MWA assisted by ultrasound FI. Complete ablation was achieved in 34 lesions with a technical success rate of 97.1%. Major complications occurred in 6.5% of patients (2/31), while no ablation-related deaths were reported. The median follow-up time of this study was 24 months (range:10 to 35 months). The technique efficacy rate was 97.1% (34/35), with LTP occurring in three lesions at a rate of 8.8% (3/34). The incidence of IDR was 38.7% (12/31) and the 2-year cumulative OS rate reached 96.7%. Moreover, there were no statistical differences in technique efficacy rate (p=0.286), LTP rate (p=0.328), major complication rate (p=0.503), IDR (p=0.857), and OS (p=0.118) between medium-sized group and large-sized group. Ultrasound FI-assisted MWA has the potential to be an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for primary and secondary liver cancers ranging from 3-7 cm in size.

34. EXTENDED RIGHT THORACIC APPROACH COMPARED WITH LIMITED LEFT THORACIC APPROACH FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: TEN-YEAR SURVIVAL OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Abstract Objective Esophagectomy can be performed using various surgical techniques. This study was conducted to understand the impact of surgery on long-term survival for esophageal cancer. Methods Between 2010 and 2012, 300 patients were prospectively recruited to compare the outcomes of esophagectomy using the right and left thoracic approaches. Based on pathological findings, 146 patients with squamous cell carcinoma in the right thoracic arm and 140 in the left arm were included in this analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two arms after a 10-year follow-up period. Results The median DFS was 92 months in the right thoracic arm and 41 months in the left arm (hazard ratio (HR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–0.99; P = 0.045), with the cumulative 10-year DFS of 48% and 38%, respectively. The median OS was 136 months in the right thoracic arm and 99 months in the left arm (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.54–1.04; P = 0.081), with cumulative 10-year OS rates of 52% and 44%, respectively. DFS and OS were comparable between the two arms for patients without lymph node metastasis. Conversely, for patients with lymph node metastasis, 10-year DFS of the right and left thoracic arms were 33% and 21%, respectively (P = 0.018), and 10-year OS were 37.9% and 25.8%, respectively (P = 0.012). Conclusion Compared to esophagectomy via the left thoracic approach, patients who underwent esophagectomy via the right thoracic approach had better 10-year survival rates, and the survival benefit was significant for those with lymph node metastasis.

Efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib-based combination therapies for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center retrospective study.

Reports on Lenvatinib-based therapies show promising treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the effect and safety of Lenvatinib-based therapies still need to be further studies. This was a retrospective, single-center study on the safety and treatment efficacy of Lenvatinib-based combination therapies for uHCC Patients. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR). Of 91 patients, there were 16 females and 75 males with uHCC who received systemic therapies based on Lenvatinib in our center. Forty-six patients (50.5%) received Lenvatinib combined with PD-1 antibody treatment. All these patients also received local therapy with the exception of 2 patients. The remaining 36 patinets received Lenvatinib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), 1 patient treated Lenvatinib combined with radiotherapy, 8 patients received Lenvatinib alone. At a median treatment time of 8 months, the objective response rate (ORR) of the entire cohort was 58.2% (53 patients), including 7 patients with CR and 46 patients with PR. 21 patients (23.1%) had SD. The disease control rate (DCR) of all patients was 81.3% (74 patients). However, 17 patients (18.7%) developed PD. The 1- and 2-year cumulative OS rates for the entire cohort were 66.8% and 39.3%, while the corresponding PFS rates were 38.0% and 17.1%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed multiple tumor sites to be an independent OS risk factor for uHCC patients (HR=2.204, 95% CI=1.104-4.399, P=0.025). The most frequently reported adverse events in all patients were AST elevation (51.6%), followed by hypertension (33.0%), ALT elevation (26.4%), and decreased appetite (25.3%). After a combination treatment of Lenvatinib-based therapies, 15 patients met the criteria for salvage liver resection and underwent down-staging hepatectomy with a curative intent. The combination of PD-1 treatment was not very effective in improving the prognosis of uHCC patients treated with Lenvatinib combined with TACE. Our study demonstrated that a proportive of patients benefited from Lenvatinib-based combination therapies with manageable safety profiles, allowing these patients to undergo downstaging surgery with curative intent.

Preoperative Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as a prognostic inflammation biomarker in Asian HIV-infected patients with gastric cancer: a single-center study

BackgroundThe serum systemic inflammation biomarkers have been established as predictors of prognosis in gastric cancer (GC) patients, but their prognostic value in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with GC has not been well studied. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative systemic inflammation biomarkers in Asian HIV-infected patients with GC.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 41 HIV-infected GC patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and December 2021 at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. Preoperative systemic inflammation biomarkers were measured and patients were divided into two groups based on the optimal cut-off value. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of variables was performed using the Cox proportional regression model. As a comparison, 127 GC patients without HIV infection were also recruited.ResultsThe median age of the 41 patients included in the study was 59 years, with 39 males and two females. The follow-up period for OS and PFS ranged from 3 to 94 months. The cumulative three-year OS rate was 46.0%, and the cumulative three-year PFS rate was 44%. HIV-infected GC patients had worse clinical outcomes compared to the normal GC population. The optimal cut-off value for preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was 199 in HIV-infected GC patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a low PLR was an independent predictor of better OS and PFS (OS: HR = 0.038, 95% CI: 0.006–0.258, P < 0.001; PFS: HR = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.004–0.201, P < 0.001). Furthermore, higher preoperative PLR in HIV-infected GC was significantly associated with lower BMI, hemoglobin, albumin, CD4 + T, CD8 + T, and CD3 + T cell counts.ConclusionThe preoperative PLR is an easily measurable immune biomarker that may provide useful prognostic information in HIV-infected GC patients. Our findings suggest that PLR could be a valuable clinical tool for guiding treatment decisions in this population.

Efficacy and safety of HAIC alone vs. HAIC combined with lenvatinib for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

To investigate efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib (HAIC-Len) and HAIC alone for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC). Totally 349 patients with Ad-HCC participated in the research from February 2018 to October 2020. On the basis of propensity score matching (PSM), 132 and 110 cases were assigned to the HAIC group and the HAIC-Len group, respectively, with a ratio of 1:1. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and complications were compared between two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were utilized to estimate cumulative OS and PFS. Additionally, uni- and multi-variate Cox regression models were employed to identify significant independent factors. The median follow-up period in this study was set to be 20.8months. Following PSM, the one-, two- and three-year cumulative OS rates in the HAIC-Len and HAIC groups were 63.6%, 12.1%, and 3.0%, and 47.2%, 11.8%, and 2.7%, respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.001). The first-three-year cumulative incidence rates PFS in the HAIC-Len and the HAIC groups were 15.2%, 1.5%, and ND, and 11.8%, 4.5%, and 3.6%, respectively, with no significant difference detected (P = 0.092). BMI (HR 0.709. 95% CI 0.549, 0.915. P = 0.008) and AST (HR 1.005. 95% CI 1.003, 1.007. P < 0.001) represented independent prognostic factors for OS. Additionally, the two groups exhibited no significant difference in the incidence rates of adverse events. HAIC-Len significantly improved survival outcomes of patients with Ad-HCC and demonstrated acceptable toxicity compared to HAIC alone.

Higher Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Is a Preoperative Inflammation Biomarker of Poor Prognosis in HIV-Infected Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

The serum systemic inflammation biomarkers are known predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) patient prognosis. However, their significance in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with CRC has not been studied. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative systemic inflammation biomarkers in HIV-infected patients with CRC. The study enrolled 57 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and HIV who underwent surgery at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center between January 2015 and December 2021. Preoperative tests were conducted, and systemic inflammation biomarkers were measured. The patients were categorized into two groups using the optimal cut-off value. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to determine overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional regression model. A time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) was used to compare the prognostic abilities of the biomarkers. The study included 57 HIV-infected CRC patients, with a median age of 60 and a follow-up time ranging from 3 to 86 months. Of the patients, 49 were male and 8 were female. The cumulative three-year OS and PFS rates were 55.0% and 45.0%, respectively. The optimal cut-off value for preoperative NLR was found to be 2.8, which was significantly correlated with lower CD8+ T and CD3+ T lymphocyte counts. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a low NLR was an independent predictor of better OS and PFS (OS: HR = 0.094, 95% CI: 0.02-0.45, P=0.003; PFS: HR = 0.265, 95% CI: 0.088-0.8, P=0.019). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) analysis showed that NLR was a superior systemic inflammation biomarker for predicting the prognosis of HIV-infected CRC patients throughout the observation period. The preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an easily measurable immune biomarker, may provide useful prognostic information in HIV-infected colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Percutaneous thermal ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy and survival.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and survival of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) -related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing percutaneous thermal ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE).MethodsA total of 83 HCV-related HCC patients who were treated with percutaneous thermal ablation combined with TACE were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic and clinical data were collected. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) rates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess independent risk factors of OS and RFS.Results92.8% patients (77/83) and 96.6% (170/176) tumor lesions achieved complete response (CR) 1 month after all treatment, and 10.8% (9/83) patients had minor complications. The median OS was 60 months (95% confidence interval (CI)= 48.0-72.0), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5- and 10-year cumulative OS rates were 94%, 78.3%, 72.3%, 43.4% and 27.5%, respectively. The cumulative RFS rates at 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year were 74.7%, 49.3%, 30.7% and 25.3%, respectively. Sex (HR =0.529, P=0.048), ablation result (HR=5.824, P=0.000) and Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score (HR=2.725, P=0.011) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (HR =2.360, P = 0.005) and tumor number(HR=2.786, P=0.000) were independent prognostic factors for RFS.ConclusionsPercutaneous thermal ablation combined with TACE is a safe and effective treatment for HCV-related HCC. Sex, ablation result and ALBI are significant prognostic factors for OS. AFP and tumor number are significant prognostic factors for RFS.

Endoscopic debulking resection with additive chemoradiotherapy: Optimal management of advanced inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUNDThere is no remedial strategy other than definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who are not eligible to undergo surgical treatment.AIMTo introduce a novel therapy called endoscopic debulking resection (EdR) followed by additive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and evaluate its efficacy and safety.METHODSAdvanced, inoperable ESCC patients between 1 January 2015 and 30 December 2019 were investigated retrospectively. Patients who received EdR followed by CRT were deemed the EdR + CRT group and those without CRT were deemed the EdR group. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events were evaluated.RESULTSA total of 41 patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 36 mo (range: 1-83), the estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative OS rates of patients who underwent EdR plus additive CRT were 92.6%, 85.2%, and 79.5%, respectively, which were higher than those of patients who underwent EdR alone (1-year OS, 83.3%; 2-year OS, 58.3%; 3-year OS, 50%; P = 0.05). The estimated 2-year cumulative PFS rate after EdR + CRT was 85.7%, while it was 61.5% after EdR (P = 0.043). According to the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, early clinical stage (stage ≤ IIB) and additive CRT were potential protective factors for cumulative OS. No severe adverse events were observed during the EdR procedure, and only mild to moderate myelosuppression and radiation pneumonia were observed in patients who underwent additive CRT after EdR.CONCLUSIONEdR plus CRT is an alternative strategy for selective advanced inoperable ESCC patients.

Short- (30-90 days) and mid-term (1-3 years) outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing surgical treatments.

BACKGROUNDThe factors influencing the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer vary among studies and are still poorly known.AIMTo determine the factors associated with survival in patients with esophageal cancer.METHODSThis retrospective study included patients with esophageal cancer admitted between January 2017 and March 2020 at Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College. All patients were treated according to the available guidelines. Follow-up was censored in October 2020. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine the independent risk factors for overall survival (OS).RESULTSIn total, 307 patients were included. Their median age was 64 (range, 44-79) years, 63.5% were male, and the median disease course was 2 (0.1-36) months. The median tumor size was 3 (0-10) cm. Most patients were T3 (29.6%), N0 (70.0%). Most tumors were grade 2 (48.2%), and 87.3% were squamous cell carcinoma. The in-hospital mortality was 16.9%, the 30-day mortality was 19.9%, and the 90-day mortality was 25.4%. The cumulative OS rates at the last follow-up were 82.1% (95%CI: 67.7%-96.5%) for stage 0/I/II and 47.4% (95%CI: 16.5-78.6%) for stage III/IVA (P < 0.001). The multivariable analysis showed that creatinine levels (HR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.00-1.03, P = 0.050), pTNM III/IVA (HR = 4.19, 95%CI: 2.19-8.01, P < 0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (HR = 0.23, 95%CI: 0.11-0.49), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) (HR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.004-1.03, P = 0.011) were independently associated with OS.CONCLUSIONThe survival of patients with esophageal cancer is poor, especially those with pTNM III/IVA. pTNM stage III/IVA, CCI, and adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) are independently associated with OS.

Combined stereotactic radiosurgery and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases.

Whether combined radiation and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations confers additional benefits over TKI therapy alone remains a matter of debate. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes between combined TKI therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus TKI therapy alone in NSCLC patients with BMs and EGFR mutations. Consecutive cases of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and BMs treated with TKIs were selected for inclusion in this study. Patients were categorized into two groups based on SRS: TKI therapy alone (group I) and combined SRS and TKI therapy (group II). Patients who had SRS or TKI as salvage therapy and those with prior radiation treatment for BMs were excluded. Tumor control (< 10% increase in tumor volume) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Independent predictors of tumor control and OS were identified using multivariable Cox regression analyses. The study cohort comprised 280 patients (n = 90 in group I and n = 190 in group II). Cumulative tumor control rates were higher in group II than in group I (79.8% vs 31.2% at 36 months, p < 0.0001). Cumulative OS rates were comparable between groups I and II (43.8% vs 59.4% at 36 months, p = 0.3203). Independent predictors of tumor control were older age (p < 0.01, HR 1.03), fewer BMs (p < 0.01, HR 1.09), lack of extracranial metastasis (p < 0.02, HR 0.70), and combined SRS and TKI therapy (p < 0.01, HR 0.25). Independent predictors of OS were fewer BMs (p < 0.01, HR 1.04) and a higher Karnofsky Performance Status score (p < 0.01, HR 0.97). Although the OS rate did not differ between TKI therapy with and without SRS, the addition of SRS to TKI therapy resulted in improvement of intracranial tumor control. The lack of effect on survival rate with the addition of SRS may be attributable to extracranial disease progression. The addition of SRS to TKI therapy is recommended for intracranial disease control in NSCLC patients with BMs and EGFR mutations. Potential benefits may include prevention of neurological deficits and seizures. Future prospective studies may help clarify the clinical outcome benefits of SRS in these patients.

Prognostic factors of recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after hepatectomy: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUNDIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly malignant tumour. Hepatectomy is an effective treatment for early ICC, but postoperative recurrence greatly affects patient survival. Studies on recurrent ICC after hepatectomy are lacking.AIMTo investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with recurrent ICC after hepatectomy, analyse prognostic factors and explore diagnosis and treatment strategies.METHODSA retrospective analysis was performed on all ICC patients undergoing hepatectomy from January 2013 to August 2021. Patients with postoperative recurrence were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cumulative overall survival was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were assessed by univariate survival analysis using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of cumulative survival was performed using the Cox proportional risk model.RESULTSDuring the 8-year study period, 103 patients underwent ICC-related hepatectomy, and 54 exhibited postoperative recurrence. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 6 mo, the median overall survival (OS) was 9 mo, and the cumulative OS rates at 1, 2 and 3 years after the operation were 40.7%, 14.8% and 7.4%, respectively. The median OS after recurrence was 4 mo, and the cumulative OS rates at 1, 2 and 3 years after recurrence were 16.1%, 6.7% and 3.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that alcohol consumption [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.53-14.04, P = 0.007] and DFS < 6 mo (HR = 3.47, 95%CI: 1.59-7.60, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for the cumulative survival of patients with recurrence, while treatment after recurrence (HR = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.08-0.55, P = 0.001) was an independent protective factor. The median OS time of patients receiving multimodality therapy after recurrence of ICC was 7 mo, which was significantly higher than that of patients receiving only local therapy (3 mo), patients receiving systematic therapy (4 mo) and patients receiving the best supportive therapy (1 mo). Patients with recurrent ICC who received multimodality therapy had a significantly better long-term survival after recurrence than those who did not (P = 0.026).CONCLUSIONThe prognosis of patients with recurrence after ICC-related hepatectomy is poor. Alcohol consumption and DFS < 6 mo are independent risk factors in terms of the cumulative survival of patients with recurrence, while treatment after recurrence is an independent protective factor. Multimodality therapy can effectively improve the prognosis of patients.

Percutaneous microwave ablation under ultrasound guidance for renal cell carcinomas at clinical staging T1 in patients aged 65 years and older: A comparative study.

To ascertain the clinical outcomes of patients aged ≥65 years with clinical staging T1 (cT1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) under ultrasound control compared with those aged <65. From September 2009 to December 2016, clinical data of two groups, Group O (≥ 65 years) consisting of 75 patients (76 RCCs) and Group Y (< 65 years) consisting of 91 patients (99 RCCs), who underwent MWA treatment for RCC with comparable mean diameters at baseline, were retrospectively evaluated. The methodological effectiveness, cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), local tumor progression (LTP), major and minor complications, and renal performance, including serum creatinine (Cr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) between the two categories, were statistically assessed by SPSS. After excision, there were no significant differences between the two groups concerning technical efficacy, LTP, and major and minor complications. The cumulative OS and DFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in Group O versus Group Y were 100%, 92.6%, and 92.6% versus 98.6%, 96.9%, and 90.9% (P = 0.701), and 100%, 92.5%, and 92.5% versus 98.6%, 96.9%, and 90.4% (P = 0.697), respectively. There was no significant variance between serum Cr and BUN between the two groups before MWA and at the last follow-up. Due to the corresponding clinical outcomes for the treatment of cT1 RCCs in patients aged <65 years and ≥65 years, the US-guided MWA is a safe and effective method and may be suggested as one of the first-line nonsurgical options for identified older patients.

Laparoscopic Hepatic Resection Versus Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinomas Smaller Than 3 cm: Analysis of Treatment Outcomes Using Propensity Score Matching.

ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic outcomes of laparoscopic hepatic resection (LHR) and laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) for single subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsWe screened 244 consecutive patients who had received either LHR or LRFA between January 2014 and December 2016. The feasibility of LRFA in patients who underwent LHR was retrospectively assessed by two interventional radiologists. Finally, 60 LRFA-feasible patients who had received LHR and 29 patients who had received LRFA as the first treatment for a solitary subcapsular HCC between 1 cm and 3 cm were finally included. We compared the therapeutic outcomes, including local tumor progression (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups before and after propensity score (PS) matching. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was also used to evaluate the difference in OS and RFS between the two groups for all 89 patients.ResultsPS matching yielded 23 patients in each group. The cumulative LTP and OS rates were not significantly different between the LHR and LRFA groups after PS matching (p = 0.900 and 0.003, respectively). The 5-year LTP rates were 4.6% and 4.4%, respectively, and OS rates were 100% and 90.7%, respectively. The RFS rate was higher in LHR group without statistical significance (p = 0.070), with 5-year rates of 78.3% and 45.3%, respectively. OS was not significantly different between the LHR (reference) and LRFA groups in multivariable analyses, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.12–1.54) (p = 0.818). RFS was higher in LHR (reference) than in LRFA without statistical significance in multivariable analysis, with an HR of 2.01 (0.87–4.66) (p = 0.102).ConclusionThere was no significant difference in therapeutic outcomes between LHR and LRFA for single subcapsular HCCs measuring 1–3 cm. The difference in RFS should be further evaluated in a larger study.

Comparisons of Outcomes Between Adolescent and Young Adult with Older Patients After Radical Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Propensity Score Matching: A Single-Center Study.

PurposeAdolescent and young adult (AYA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) occurs in patients below 40 years old. Whether AYA patients have worse outcomes compared with older patients is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of AYA patients and older patients after radical surgery for PDAC.MethodsA single-center, retrospective, cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent radical surgery for PDAC in Xiangya Hospital Central South University from January 2007 to December 2019. The clinicopathological data and results of patients with PDAC were collected and analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into AYA group and older group based on age (<40, AYA group; ≥40, older group). Based on all the considered covariates except age, we estimated 1:2 case propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsA total of 1033 cases were enrolled, 46 cases (4.45%) in the AYA group. Both before and after PSM, the AYA patients have a higher preoperative CA19-9 than the older patients (P < 0.001) and (P < 0.001). Pathological results showed that AYA group had a higher microvascular invasion rate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.045) than older group. The median time of overall survival (OS) in AYA group and older group were 13 months (95% CI = 11.50–14.50) and 14 months (95% CI = 13.50–14.50), respectively. Additionally, AYA group have a worse 2-year OS rate than older group (8.70% vs 25.23%, P = 0.011 and 8.70% vs 25.00%, P = 0.023). According to the Log rank test, AYA group have a worse cumulative OS rate than older group (P = 0.002) and (P = 0.030), respectively.ConclusionPDAC might be more aggressive in AYA, and the cumulative OS after radical PDAC surgery in AYA patients is worse than that in older patients.

Resection or ablation versus transarterial therapy for Child-Pugh A patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Data from a direct comparison of the long-term survival outcomes of surgical resection (SR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus transarterial therapy in Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP)-class A patients with a single small T1/T2 stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (≤3 cm) are still lacking. This study retrospectively compared the therapeutic outcomes of these treatment types for CTP-A patients with a single small HCC.Using a nationwide Korean registry, we identified 2314 CTP-A patients with SR (n = 722), RFA (n = 731), or transarterial therapy (n = 861) for a single (≤3 cm) T1/T2 stage HCC from 2008 to 2014. The posttreatment overall survival (OS) of transarterial therapy with either SR or RFA were compared using the Inverse Probability of treatment Weighting (IPW). The median follow-up period was 50 months (range 1–107 months).After IPW, the cumulative OS rates after SR or RFA were significantly higher than those after transarterial therapy in all subjects (all P values < .05). The OS rates after SR or RFA were better than those after transarterial therapy in patients with the hepatitis B or C virus (all P values < .05), and in patients aged <65 years (all P values < .05). The cumulative OSs between RFA and transarterial therapy were statistically comparable in patients with a 2 to 3 cm HCC and aged ≥65 years, respectively. For all subjects, the weighted Cox proportional hazards model using IPW provided the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for the OS after SR versus transarterial therapy and after RFA versus transarterial therapy of 0.42 (0.30–0.60) (P < .001) and 0.78 (0.61–0.99) (P = .044), respectively.In CTP-A patients with a single (≤3 cm) T1/T2 HCC, SR or RFA provides a better OS than transarterial therapy, regardless of the HCC etiology (hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus), especially in patients with HCC of <2 cm and aged <65 years.

MELD-Na > 16 is associated with high peri-procedural and short-term mortality in patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma treated with emergent transarterial embolization.

To evaluate prognostic factors associated with peri-procedural (30days) and short-term (90days) mortality in the United States cohort of patients following emergent transarterial embolization for ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma treated with emergent TAE between January 2001 and December 2019 were retrospectively identified (n = 24). Average age was 62years (range, 23-78year); 15 (62.5%) were men. Univariate and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to determine independent predictors of overall survival (OS) following TAE. OS stratified by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Twenty-one patients (88%) died during a mean clinical follow-up period of 328 ± 139days. MELD-Na score (HR 1.22 per 1-unit increase; 95% CI 1.06-1.46; p = 0.005) and pre-rupture ECOG PS score (HR 8.1; 95% CI 1.28-51.2; p = 0.026) were independent predictors of decreased overall survival. There was no significant association between overall survival and presence of cardiovascular co-morbidities (p = 0.60), hemorrhagic shock on presentation (p = 0.16), portal vein thrombus (p = 0.08), vasopressor support required (p = 0.79), intubation required (p = 0.40), acute kidney injury (p = 0.58), and number of packed red blood cell transfusions (p = 0.22). The median OS was 64days. Median OS was significantly greater in patients with a MELD-Na score ≤ 16 as compared to those with a MELD-Na score > 16 (166.5days vs 9days, p = 0.011). Cumulative OS rates in those with a MELD-Na score ≤ 16 at 30, 60, 90, and 360days were 79%, 64%, 64%, and 25%, respectively, vs 33%, 33%, 11%, and 0%, respectively, in those with a MELD-Na score > 16. MELD-Na > 16 is associated with very high peri-procedural (67% at 30days) and short-term (89% at 90days) mortality in patients with ruptured HCC treated with emergent transarterial embolization. A better understanding of these prognostic factors may help guide treatment decisions and provide realistic expectations when counseling patients and their families.