Outpatient Opioid Use Research Articles

Prediction Model for Outpatient Opioid Use Following the Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum

IntroductionTo minimize unused outpatient opioids while providing adequate pain control, we sought to create a model to predict outpatient opioid use following the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum with cryoablation MIRPE-C. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted at a single center from May 2023 to January 2024 among patients <21 years who underwent MIPRE-C. Demographic and clinical data, including inpatient and outpatient opioid use were reviewed. Patients completed opioid use questionnaires at their first postoperative visit. Simple linear regression was employed to create a model for outpatient opioid use. ResultsSixty-eight patients underwent MIRPE-C: 84% were male (mean age of 15.2 ± 1.7 years, and median Haller index 4.2[IQR:3.7–5.7]). Daily mean inpatient opioid requirement and daily opioid doses were 0.3 ± 0.2 OME/day/kg and 2 ± 1.2 opioid doses/day. At the first outpatient follow-up visit, patients reported using a median of five 5-mg oxycodone tablets [IQR:1.6–10] for 5 days [IQR:2–7] with 22% of patients needing an opioid refill. On linear regression, inpatient opioid use had a significant relationship with the number of outpatient doses taken, while patient factors were not associated with outpatient opioid use. A simple equation for predicting opioid need based on best fit (R2 = 0.211) was developed:#OUTPATIENT OPIOID TABLETS = 3 TABLETS + (0.82 x #INPATIENT OPIOID RECIEVED). ConclusionThe proposed outpatient opioid prescription model is simple to calculate and tailors the prescription to individual patient need. This model has the potential to provide effective pain control and avoid prescription refills, while minimizing over-prescription of opioids. Level of EvidenceTreatment study Level III.

Opioid consumption before discharge predicts outpatient opioid use in adolescents undergoing surgery

BackgroundThe majority of adolescents undergoing surgery report unused prescription opioids after surgery, increasing the risk of diversion, misuse, and addiction. Adult studies have demonstrated that opioid use 24 hours before discharge corresponds with opioid use at home. We hypothesized that inpatient opioid consumption is associated with outpatient opioid use in adolescents. MethodsAdolescents aged 13-20 years undergoing elective surgery associated with an opioid prescription were prospectively recruited. Parent-adolescent dyads were surveyed preoperatively to assess sociodemographics, health literacy, and baseline substance use, and opioid use was measured at 30- and 90-days postoperatively. Medical records were reviewed to calculate cumulative opioid use during hospitalization. Inpatient and postoperative opioid use was converted to oral morphine equivalents. Adjusting for age, sex, race, health literacy, alcohol use, pain score, and surgery, multivariable linear regression identified factors associated with outpatient oral morphine equivalent use 90 days postoperatively. ResultsOverall, 103 adolescents were enrolled. Median oral morphine equivalents used from 24 and 48 hours before discharge and throughout the hospitalization were 30.8 (interquartile range:11.7–45.0), 67.5 (interquartile range:37.5–94.3), and 97.5 (interquartile range:18.0–152.7), respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated that adolescent-reported pain at discharge (P = .028) and cumulative oral morphine equivalents used 24 hours (P < .001) and 48 hours (P = .003) before discharge were significantly associated with postoperative oral morphine equivalents use at home. Oral morphine equivalents consumption 24 hours before discharge estimated cumulative oral morphine equivalents use 90 days postoperatively at a 1-to-5 ratio in 94.1% of patients. ConclusionFor adolescents undergoing surgery, patient-reported pain at discharge and oral morphine equivalents administered 24 hours before discharge are associated with cumulative outpatient opioid use. Tailoring outpatient prescriptions to total oral morphine equivalent consumption 24 hours before discharge could reduce excess opioid prescribing.

Single-Center In-Hospital and Outpatient Opioid Use for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease.

The pain associated with lower extremity arterial disease is difficult to treat, even with lower extremity revascularization. We sought to evaluate in-hospital and post-operative opioid usage in patients with different disease severities and treatments for lower extremity vascular disease. A retrospective review was performed for all hospital encounters for patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code consistent with lower extremity arterial disease admitted to a single center between January 2018 and March 2023. Cases included patients admitted to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of lower extremity arterial disease. These patients were subdivided based on disease severity, treatment type, and comorbid diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The analysis focused on in-hospital opioid use frequency and dosage among these patients. The control group (CON) included encounters for patients admitted with a secondary diagnosis of lower extremity atherosclerotic disease. A total of 438 patients represented by all the analyzed encounters were then reviewed for the number and type of vascular procedures performed as well as opioid use in the outpatient setting for one year. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) encounters were more likely to use opioids as compared to the CON and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) without rest pain, ulcer or gangrene groups (CLI 67.9% (95% CI: 63.6%-71.6%) versus CON 52.1% (95% CI: 48.5%-55.7%), p < 0.001 and CLI 67.9% (95% CI: 63.6%-71.6%) versus PAD 50.2% (95% CI: 42.6%-57.4%), p < 0.001). Opioid use was also more common in encounters for gangrene and groups treated with revascularization (REVASC) and amputation (AMP) as compared to CON (gangrene 74.5% (95% CI: 68.5%-82.1%) versus CON 52.1% (95% CI: 48.5%-55.7%), p < 0.01; REVASC 58.3% (95% CI: 57.3%-66.4%) versus CON 52.1% (95% CI: 48.5%-55.7%), p =0.01; and AMP 72.3% (95% CI: 62.1%-74.0%) versus CON 52.1% (95% CI: 48.5%-55.7%), p < 0.01). Significantly increased oral opioid doses per day (MME/day) were not noted for any of the investigated groups as compared to the CON. In the outpatient setting, 186 (42.5% (95% CI: 37.2%-46.4%)) patients were using opioids one month after the most recent vascular intervention. By one year, 31 (7.1% (95% CI: 1.30%-7.70%)) patients were still using opioids. No differences in opioid usage were noted for patients undergoing single versus multiple vascular interventions at one year. Patients undergoing certain vascular surgery procedures were more likely to be using opioids at one year. Patients with CLI and gangrene as well as those undergoing vascular treatment have a greater frequency of opioid use during hospital encounters as compared to those patients with less severe disease and undergoing conservative management, respectively. However, these findings do not equate to higher doses of opioids used during hospitalization. Patients undergoing multiple vascular procedures are not more likely to be using opioids long-term (at one year) as compared to those patients treated with single vascular procedures.

Developing and Implementing a Patient-Centered Opioid Prescribing Algorithm among Gynecological Oncology Patients.

Background: The opioid epidemic is a public health crisis. However, opioid prescription recommendations have not been established in gynecological oncology, and guidelines that incorporate patient-reported pain are lacking. Objectives: The article aims to evaluate prescribing patterns, utilization, and patient-reported pain control in gynecological oncology patients at a large tertiary academic center. Methods: This was a two-phase, prospective cohort study. For Phase 1, patients undergoing hysterectomy through the gynecological oncology division at the University of New Mexico were enrolled. Postoperative opioid use was collected and standardized to oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). The factors associated with outpatient opioid use were used to develop an opioid prescription algorithm. In Phase 2, we evaluated the implementation of the prescription algorithm. For both phases, patients completed a demographic survey, satisfaction survey, and validated pain questionnaires. Results: In Phase 1, the amount of opioids used was significantly lower than the amount of opioids prescribed. Factors that correlated with postoperative opioid use included surgical procedures and last 24-hour inpatient MME use. A standardized opioid prescription algorithm was developed by incorporating these factors. In Phase 2, the opioid prescribing algorithm there was no significant difference in pain scores between the two phases. Conclusions: Opioids were substantially overprescribed in gynecological oncology patients undergoing hysterectomy. Our study found that the surgical route and last 24-hour MME inpatient usage were reliable predictors of outpatient opioid use. We developed and implemented a standardized opioid prescription algorithm that was validated by comparing the pain control measures in the two phases.

Patient experiences with outpatient opioid use disorder treatment before and during COVID-19: results from a survey of Medicaid members

ABSTRACT Background: Payers are increasingly interested in quality improvement for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, including incorporating patient experiences. Medicaid is the largest payer for OUD treatment, yet we know little about the treatment benefits Medicaid members report, how these vary across members, or changed with the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To examine Medicaid members’ report of outpatient treatment benefits, employment, and housing outcomes before and during the pandemic. Methods: A representative sample of 1,032 Virginia Medicaid members (52% women) receiving OUD treatment completed a survey of treatment benefits, health status and social needs. A reported treatment benefit index was created based on seven self-reported items. Multivariable linear regression models, pooled and stratified by time (pre-COVID-19/COVID-19), assessed member characteristics associated with reported treatment benefit, employment and housing outcomes. Results: Members reported strong treatment benefit (mean: 21.8 [SD: 5.9] out of 28 points) and improvements in employment (2.4 [1.3] out of 5) and housing (2.8 [1.2] out of 5). After adjustment, mental distress (regression coefficient: −3.00 [95% CI:-3.97;-2.03]), polysubstance use (−1.25 [−1.99;-0.51]), and food insecurity (−1.00 [−1.71;-0.29]), were associated with decreased benefits from treatment. During COVID-19, justice-involved individuals reported decreased benefits (−2.17 [−3.54; −0.80]) compared to before the pandemic (−0.09 [−1.4-;1.24] p < .05). Conclusions: Medicaid members receiving outpatient OUD treatment reported positive treatment benefits, and housing and employment outcomes. However, those with comorbid health and social conditions often benefited the least. As payers move toward quality improvement and value-based purchasing initiatives, collecting and integrating patient reported outcomes into quality metrics is critical.

Interactions Between Endocannabinoid and Endogenous Opioid Systems Prospectively Influence Postoperative Opioid Use in Pregnant Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

Both endocannabinoid (EC) and endogenous opioid systems are involved in nociceptive processing and may work together synergistically based on preclinical models. This study evaluated the interactive effects of preoperative beta-endorphin (BE) concentrations (a key analgesic endogenous opioid) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and ECs (CSF and plasma 2-arachidonoylglycerol and plasma anandamide) on postoperative opioid use and pain intensity in a prospective cohort of n = 112 pregnant patients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery. Maternal blood and CSF samples were collected preoperatively for BE and EC assays. Patients completed measures of outpatient opioid use (number of tablets used and days of use) and average pain intensity at 2 weeks postoperatively. Results of general linear model analyses controlling for maternal age, body mass index at time of delivery, and race revealed significant multiplicative interactions between EC and BE concentrations on number of opioid tablets used (based on pill count), days of opioid use, and total milligram morphine equivalents used in the 2-week follow-up period. Elevated preoperative plasma and CSF 2-arachidonoylglycerol predicted reduced outpatient opioid analgesic use, particularly for patients low in CSF BE. Similar analyses for pain intensity at 2-week follow-up indicated a significant interaction (P < .02) characterized by higher preoperative BE concentrations being associated with lower subsequent pain only for individuals with low preoperative plasma anandamide concentrations. Further exploration of interactions between EC and endogenous opioid inhibitory systems as they influence responses to opioid analgesics in other clinical pain populations may help guide the development of precision pain management approaches. PerspectiveIn the postoperative setting of patients undergoing cesarean delivery, elevated ECs were linked to reduced outpatient opioid analgesic use in individuals who had low endogenous opioid concentrations in CSF. Further exploration of interactions between these 2 inhibitory systems as they impact responses to pain management interventions appears warranted.

Outpatient Prescription Opioid Use following Discharge after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Breast Reconstruction with and without an Educational Intervention.

There is limited evidence for appropriate postoperative opioid prescribing in autologous breast reconstruction. We sought to describe postoperative outpatient prescription opioid use following discharge after deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstruction with and without an educational video. Patients undergoing DIEP reconstruction were given a 28-day postoperative pain and medication logbook from August 2022 to June 2023. Our practice implemented an educational video upon discharge on proper opioid consumption. Descriptive statistics on patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, and outpatient prescription opioid use after discharge were compared between the two cohorts. A total of 53 logbooks were completed with 20 patients in the no video cohort and 33 in the video cohort. On average, the days to cessation of opiates was longer in the no video cohort (8.2 vs. 5.1 days, p = 0.003). The average number of oxycodone 5 mg equivalents consumed following discharge was 13.8 in the no video cohort and 7.8 in the video cohort, which was statistically significant (p = 0.01). Overall, the percentage of opioids prescribed that were consumed in the video cohort was 28.3% versus 67.1% in the no video cohort. For patients discharging home after DIEP reconstruction, we recommend a prescription for 12 oxycodone 5 mg tablets. With the use of an educational video regarding proper opioid consumption, we were able to reduce the total outpatient opioid use to 5 oxycodone 5 mg tablets following hospital discharge.

Opioid Use in Patients With Cervical Cancer at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Opioids are a common treatment for cancer-related pain and information is limited on the rates of opioid use for cervical cancer patients. This study aimed to analyze outpatient opioid use and various predictors among patients with cervical cancer at a tertiary academic medical center. Data from patients with cervical cancer receiving treatment at a single institution, from August 2019 to July 2022, were retrospectively collected. Women with unrelated chronic opioid use or opioid use associated with acute inpatient stays were excluded. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment characteristics, disease outcomes, and opioid prescriptions. The primary endpoint was duration of opioid use ≥6 months. Pearson's chi-squared testing, Welch's two-sample t-testing and Fisher's exact testing were used to determine predictors of opioid use ≥6 months. In total, 108 patients with cervical cancer (76.1%) of the 142 that received treatment were prescribed opioids. In women who were prescribed outpatient opioids, the median duration of opioid use was 69 days (interquartile range=5-359 days). In total, 40 (37.0%) had prescriptions for ≥180 days and 27 (25.0%) had prescriptions ≥365 days. On bivariate analysis, lower stage and receipt of surgery were associated with opioid use duration <6 months. Age, race, histology, substance/tobacco/alcohol use, depression/anxiety, and the receipt of brachytherapy/radiation were not associated with length of opioid prescriptions. This study demonstrated that 37% of patients with cervical cancer were using opioids for cancer-related pain longer than 6 months. Higher stage was associated with opioid use duration ≥6 months.

A Prospective Longitudinal Quality Initiative toward Improved Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathways.

This study aimed to evaluate whether enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) pathways reduces inpatient and outpatient opioid use, pain scores and improves the indicators of postoperative recovery. This is a prospective, longitudinal, quality improvement study of all patients older than 18 undergoing an uncomplicated cesarean delivery (CD) at an academic medical center. We excluded complicated CD, patients with chronic pain disorders, chronic opioid use, acute postpartum depression, or mothers whose neonate demised before their discharge. Lastly, we excluded non-English- and non-Spanish-speaking patients. Our study compared patient outcomes before (pre-ERAC) and after (post-ERAC) implementation of ERAC pathways. Primary outcomes were inpatient morphine milligram equivalent (MME) use and the patient's delta pain scores. Secondary outcomes were outpatient MME prescriptions and indicators of postoperative recovery (time to feeding, ambulation, and hospital discharge). Of 308 patients undergoing CD from October 2019 to September 2020, 196 were enrolled in the pre-ERAC cohort and 112 in the post-ERAC cohort. Patients in the pre-ERAC cohort were more likely to require opioids in the postoperative period compared with the post-ERAC cohort (81.6 vs. 64.3%, p < 0.001). Likewise, there was a higher use of MME per stay in the pre-ERAC cohort (30 [20-49] vs. 16.8 MME [11.2-33.9], p < 0.001). There was also a higher number of patients who required prescribed opioids at the time of discharge (98 vs. 86.6%, p < 0.001) as well as in the amount of MMEs prescribed (150 [150-225] vs. 150 MME [112-150], p < 0.001; different shape of distribution). Furthermore, the patients in the pre-ERAC cohort had higher delta pain scores (3.3 [2.3-4.7] vs. 2.2 [1.3-3.7], p < 0.001). Our study has illustrated that our ERAC pathways were associated with reduced inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid use, patient-reported pain scores, and improved indicators of postoperative recovery. · Implementation of ERAC pathways is associated with a higher percentage of no postpartum opioid use.. · Implementation of ERAC pathways is associated with lower delta (reported - expected) pain scores.. · The results of ERAC pathways implementation are increased by adopting a patient-centered approach..

A Multimodal Approach to Reducing Post-Cesarean Opioid Use: A Quality Improvement Initiative

(BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;129:1583–1590) Opioid administration following cesarean delivery is common in the United States, but the number of opioids prescribed is often higher than needed to control pain. Opioid overdose deaths among reproductive-age women have increased since 1999. Opioids also are associated with adverse effects and outcomes for mothers and neonates. A multi-modal approach using acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is recommended by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. These methods have been shown to reduce opioid use and adequately manage pain but have not been widely adopted by clinicians. This study evaluated a four-part quality improvement initiative, including nursing education, designed to reduce inpatient and outpatient opioid use and prescribing patterns.

Opioid Consumption Before Discharge Predicts Outpatient Opioid Use in Adolescents Undergoing Surgery

Chen, Stephanie MD; Ourshalimian, Shadassa MPH; Hijaz, Donia BA; Odegard, Marjorie MD; Sung-Kyun Kim, Eugene MD, FACS; Andras, Lindsay MD; Kelley-Quon, Lorraine I MD, MSHS, FACS, FAAP Author Information

Daily pain and opioid administration in hospitalized patients with cancer: the importance of psychological factors, recent surgery, and current opioid use.

Pain is common and variable in its severity among hospitalized patients with cancer. Although biopsychosocial factors are well established as modulators of chronic pain, less is known about what patient-level factors are associated with worse pain outcomes among hospitalized cancer patients. This prospective cohort study included patients with active cancer presenting to the emergency department (ED) with pain severity of ≥4/10 and followed pain outcomes longitudinally throughout hospital admission. Baseline demographic, clinical, and psychological factors were assessed on ED presentation, and daily average clinical pain ratings and opioid consumption during hospitalization were abstracted. Univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equation analyses examined associations of candidate biopsychosocial, demographic, and clinical predictors with average daily pain and opioid administration. Among 113 hospitalized patients, 73% reported pain as the primary reason for presenting to the ED, 43% took outpatient opioids, and 27% had chronic pain that predated their cancer. Higher pain catastrophizing ( B = 0.1, P ≤ 0.001), more recent surgery ( B = -0.2, P ≤ 0.05), outpatient opioid use ( B = 1.4, P ≤ 0.001), and history of chronic pain before cancer diagnosis ( B = 0.8, P ≤ 0.05) were independently associated with greater average daily pain while admitted to the hospital. Higher pain catastrophizing ( B = 1.6, P ≤ 0.05), higher anxiety ( B = 3.7, P ≤ 0.05), lower depression ( B = -4.9, P ≤ 0.05), metastatic disease ( B = 16.2, P ≤ 0.05), and outpatient opioid use ( B = 32.8, P ≤ 0.001) were independently associated with higher daily opioid administration. Greater psychological distress, especially pain catastrophizing, as well as pain and opioid use history, predicted greater difficulty with pain management among hospitalized cancer patients, suggesting that early assessment of patient-level characteristics may help direct consultation for more intensive pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions.

Effect of panniculus elevation device on postoperative pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

Suboptimal treatment of postpartum pain is associated with persistent pain and postpartum depression. Multimodal analgesia can achieve superior pain relief and decreased opioid consumption after surgery. There is limited and conflicting data on abdominal support devices to reduce postoperative pain and opioid use after cesarean delivery. This study aimed to examine whether the use of a panniculus elevation device decreases opioid use and improves postoperative pain after cesarean delivery. This was an unblinded prospective trial in which eligible, consenting patients aged ≥18 years were randomized to the panniculus elevation device group or no device group within 36 hours after cesarean delivery. The device studied adheres to the abdomen and lifts the panniculus. Moreover, it can be repositioned during use. Patients with a vertical skin incision or chronic opioid use disorder were excluded. Participants were surveyed 10 and 14 days after delivery about opioid use and pain satisfaction. The primary outcome was total morphine milligram equivalents used after delivery. The secondary outcomes were inpatient and outpatient opioid use, subjective pain scores, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference scores. An a priori subgroup analysis was performed on participants with obesity who may uniquely benefit from panniculus elevation. Of 538 patients screened for inclusion from April 2021 to July 2022, 484 were eligible, and 278 were consented and randomized. Moreover, 56 participants (20%) were lost to follow-up, leaving 222 (118 in the device group vs 104 in the control group) for analysis. Follow-up frequency was similar between groups (P=.09). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. There was no statistically significant difference in total opioid use, other opioid use measures, or pain satisfaction outcomes. Median device use was 5 days (interquartile range, 3-9), and 64% of participants randomized to device use stated that they would use it again. Here, similar trends were observed among participants with obesity (n=152). The use of a panniculus elevation device did not significantly reduce total opioid use after cesarean delivery in patients.

Prolonged Opioid Usage Following Hip Fracture Surgery in Opioid-Naïve Older Patients

BackgroundWhile the risk of long-term dependence following the opioid treatment of musculoskeletal injury is often studied in younger populations, studies in older patients have centered on short-term risks such as oversedation and delirium. This study investigated prolonged opioid usage after hip fracture in older individuals, focusing on prevalence, risk factors, and changes over time. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study of 47,309 opioid-naïve patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent hip fracture surgery (2009 to 2020), outpatient opioid use was evaluated in 3 postoperative time periods: P1 (day 0 to 30 postsurgery); P2 (day 31 to 90); and P3 (day 91 to 180). The primary outcome was prolonged outpatient opioid use, defined as having one or more opioid prescriptions dispensed in all 3 time periods. ResultsThe incidence of prolonged opioid usage among patients surviving to P3 was 6.3% (2,834 of 44,850). Initial prescription quantities decreased over time, as did the risk of prolonged opioid usage (from 8.0% in 2009 to 3.9% in 2019). In the multivariable analyses, risk factors for prolonged opioid usage included younger age, women, current/former smoking, fracture fixation (as compared to hemiarthroplasty), and anxiety. Prolonged opioid usage was less common among patients who were Asian or had a history of dementia. ConclusionsWhile prior research on the hazards of opioids in the elderly has focused on short-term risks such as oversedation and delirium, these findings suggest that prolonged opioid usage may be a risk for this older population as well. As initial prescription amounts have decreased, declines in prolonged opioid medication usage have also been observed.

AUGS-IUGA Joint Clinical Consensus Statement on Enhanced Recovery After Urogynecologic Surgery

AUGS-IUGA Joint Clinical Consensus Statement on Enhanced Recovery After Urogynecologic Surgery

Effect of pannus elevation device on postoperative pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

This study examines whether an abdominal pannus elevation device decreases opioid use and improves postoperative pain after cesarean birth. The device adheres to the pannus allowing it to be positioned away from the incision during wound healing and can be repositioned during use over several days. Patients >18 years old were randomized 1:1 device versus no device on postoperative day 1 following cesarean birth. Patients with vertical skin incision or chronic opioid use were excluded. Participants were surveyed at 10 days post-delivery about opioid tablets remaining and pain satisfaction. Primary outcome was total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used postpartum. Secondary outcomes were inpatient and outpatient opioid use, pain scores, and PROMIS 29 scores. We determined that 216 participants were required to detect a 40% reduction in MME using 80% power with an alpha of 5%. We estimated 20% lost to follow up for primary outcome. We planned an a priori subgroup analysis of obese patients (BMI>30) since they may uniquely benefit from pannus elevation. Of 538 patients screened, 484 (90%) qualified and 275 (56%) consented for randomization. Fifty-three (19%) were lost to follow up leaving 222 (118 device vs 104 control) for analysis (Figure). Follow up frequency was similar between groups (p=.09). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Median device use was 5 days (IQR 3-9). There were no statistically significant differences in MME, other opioid use measures, or pain satisfaction outcomes (Table). A 20% reduction in primary outcome as well as lower pain scores were observed, and 64% of participants randomized to device stated they would use it after another birth but these did not reach statistical significance. We observed similar trends among obese participants (N=152). Surgical site infection was rare (n=3) and was not assessed. A pannus elevation device did not reduce total opioid use by 40% after cesarean. This study may be underpowered to detect smaller but clinically significant differences, especially among obese patients.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

What influences physician opioid prescribing for children with acute pain?

Pain is one of the most common symptoms encountered in the healthcare system, and opioids are among the top three medications used to treat it. Understanding the reasoning behind physicians' opioid prescribing practices is vital to safe practice. The primary objective of our study was to describe pediatric emergency physicians' decision-making process when prescribing opioids for children's acute pain management. This study employed qualitative methodology, using one-on-one semi-structured interviews within a grounded theory analytic framework. We employed purposeful sampling to recruit pediatric emergency physicians from across Canada. Interviews were conducted by telephone (December 2019-January 2021). Transcript analysis occurred concurrently with data collection, supporting data saturation and theory development considerations. Eleven interviews were completed with participants representing each of Canada's geographic regions. Nine major themes emerged: (1) practice setting and outpatient opioid use, (2) condition-specific considerations, (3) physician confidence in medical evidence, (4) pain assessment challenges, (5) patient and family perspectives, (6) opioid safety concerns, (7) personal biases and experiences, (8) personal practice context, and (9) the Opioid Crisis/media influence. Most clinicians felt that they limited opioid use to those who needed it most; all participants described challenges managing acute pain, emphasizing the need for accurate pain measurement and better guidelines, evidence-based data, and knowledge translation. Clinicians were more comfortable treating pain in the emergency department, compared to discharge prescribing. They recognized the importance of co-therapy with non-opioids and the need for opioid risk assessment when prescribing. A family centered approach was recognized as the goal of practice. Clinicians are less comfortable prescribing opioids to children for at-home use and find pain assessment and lack of clear guidelines to be barriers to pain care. Knowledge translation strategies for safer practice and optimal acute pain management could support responsible and judicious opioid use.

17 Pre-operative patient characteristics predict outpatient opioid use

17 Pre-operative patient characteristics predict outpatient opioid use

Prediction of daily pain and opioid consumption in hospitalized patients with cancer: The importance of psychological symptoms, previous pain, and opioid use.

195 Background: Pain is among the most common reasons that cancer patients present to the emergency department (ED) and are ultimately hospitalized, yet little is known about the patient-level predictors and outcomes of pain-related ED visits and hospitalizations. This study sought to evaluate the predictive association of clinical pain and psychological variables on ED admission with average daily pain and opioid consumption in subsequently hospitalized patients with cancer. Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients with active cancer presenting to the ED with pain severity ≥4/10 on presentation completed baseline surveys that assessed demographic, socioeconomic, cancer diagnosis and treatment, medication use, and psychosocial profiles using validated questionnaires. Daily pain scores and opioids administrated were abstracted from the hospital record. Univariable and multivariable general estimating equation (GEE) analyses examined associations of baseline socioeconomic and clinical variables with the primary outcomes, average daily pain and total daily opioid administration. Results: Patients (N = 113) had various types of cancer, with 91% having a diagnosis of &gt; 1 year, 80% with metastatic solid tumors, 73% reported pain as the primary reason for the ED visit, 43% were taking opioids, and 27% had chronic pain predating their cancer. Average daily pain scores ranged between (3.4 to 5.0 out of 10) and daily MMEs ranged between 0 to 1136 MMEs, yet the majority received lower than 60 MMEs per day. In multivariable models, higher pain catastrophizing (B = 0.1, p= 0.001), more recent surgery (B = -0.2 p= 0.016), outpatient opioid use (B = 1.4, p&lt;0.001), and history of chronic pain (B = 0.8, p= 0.022) before cancer diagnosis were independent predictors of greater average daily pain during hospitalization. Higher pain catastrophizing (B = 1.6, p= 0.049), higher anxiety (B = 3.7, p= 0.030), lower depression (B = -4.9, p= 0.028), metastatic disease (B = 16.2, p= 0.038), and outpatient opioid use (B = 32.8, p&lt;0.001) were independent predictors of greater daily opioid administration during hospitalization. Conclusions: An evaluation of psychological distress and current opioid use may help to identify cancer patients at increased risk for more severe pain and higher analgesic requirements during hospitalization. This identification will facilitate the delivery of more intensive pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions.

Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery Targeting Opioid Prescriptions (BSTOP) protocol on postoperative pain control.

BackgroundSurgical pain management is a critical component in the success of bariatric procedures. With the opioid epidemic, there have been increased efforts to decrease opioid use. In 2019, the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program developed the BSTOP protocol, a multimodal perioperative pain management regimen to minimize opioid use. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the BSTOP protocol on patients’ need for opioid medications during their perioperative care.MethodsThis is a single-institution prospective cohort study on patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 10/2019 to 5/2021. Data was collected on morphine equivalent dose of opioids during different stages of inpatient and outpatient care. BSTOP was implemented on 7/2020. Primary outcomes were total inpatient and outpatient opioid use as well as hospital length of hospital stay (LOS). Gabapentin was removed from the protocol between 10/20/2020 and 12/31/2020 due to side effects; it was re-implemented on 1/1/2021 due to observed spikes in opioid use during its absence.Results1264 patients who had bariatric surgery between 10/2019 and 5/2021 were included in the study, with 409 patients before (pre-BSTOP) and 855 patients after BSTOP implementation. There was a 36% reduction in total inpatient opiate use and a 57% reduction in total outpatient opiate use. LOS also significantly decreased, from 1.53 to 1.28 days. 179 patients received BSTOP without gabapentin. These patients used more opioids in the post-anesthesia care unit and on the inpatient floors compared to pre-BSTOP and BSTOP with gabapentin patients. With total inpatient and outpatient opioid use, patients on BSTOP without gabapentin used fewer opioids than those pre-BSTOP. However, those on BSTOP without gabapentin used more opioids than those with gabapentin.ConclusionThe BSTOP protocol significantly reduced inpatient and outpatient opioid use as well as LOS. Gabapentin is a crucial component of the BSTOP protocol.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09646-4.