Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Research Articles

Diverticulitis evaluation and management among United States emergency departments over an eight-year period

IntroductionDiverticulitis is a common reason for presentation to the Emergency Department (ED). However, as imaging options, risk stratification tools, and antibiotic options have expanded, there is a need for current data on the changes in incidence, computed tomography (CT) performance, antibiotic usage, and disposition over time. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study of ED patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023. Using the Epic Cosmos database, all ED visits for acute diverticulitis were identified using ICD-10 codes. Outcomes included total ED presentations for diverticulitis, admission rates, CTs performed, outpatient antibiotic prescriptions, and antibiotics administered in the ED for admitted patients. ResultsThere were 186,138,130 total ED encounters, with diverticulitis representing 927,326 (0.50 %). The rate of diverticulitis diagnosis increased from 0.40 % to 0.56 % over time. The admission rate declined over time from 33.6 % to 27.7 %, while the CT rate rose from 83.0 % to 92.6 %. Among those discharged, 90.4 % received an antibiotic, which remained consistent over time. Metronidazole (55.1 %) and ciprofloxacin (40.8 %) were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics, followed by amoxicillin-clavulanate (36.1 %). Among those admitted, most received either metronidazole (62.0 %), a fluoroquinolone (40.4 %), a third-generation cephalosporin (18.9 %), or a penicillin-based agent (38.1 %). Among both discharged and admitted patients, there was a marked shift to penicillin-based agents as the primary antibiotic regimen. ConclusionDiverticulitis remains a common ED presentation, with a gradually rising incidence over time. Admission rates have decreased, while CT imaging has become more common. Most patients receive antibiotics, though the specific antibiotic has shifted in favor of penicillin-based agents. These findings can provide key benchmarking data and inform future initiatives to guide imaging and antibiotic use.

Post-pandemic consumption of outpatient antibiotics in Switzerland up to pre-pandemic levels, 2018–2023: An interrupted time series analysis

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has been a challenge for health-care systems and antibiotic stewards as uncertainty regarding treatment and bacterial coinfections raised concern. MethodsThis retrospective observational study examined the association of the pandemic on outpatient antibiotic sales and prescriptions in Switzerland using interrupted time series (ITS) analyses. Data from IQVIA™ and the Sentinella Network were used to analyze antibiotic consumption and prescription patterns over a 72-month period from January 2018 to December 2023, divided into pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods. ResultsAntibiotic consumption decreased during the pandemic and returned to pre-pandemic levels in the post-pandemic period. A decrease in level was most pronounced in the French-speaking region (−2.82 defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DID) per month, 95 %CI [−4.34, −1.30], p < 0.001) and the Italian-speaking region (−2.80 DID per month, 95 %CI [−4.78, −0.82], p < 0.01), followed by the German-speaking region (−1.72 DID per month, 95 %CI [−2.71, −0.74], p < 0.01). Similarly, in the ITS, the relative change of model estimates in antibiotic prescriptions by GPs and pediatricians for upper respiratory tract infections, was of −36.0 % and −50.3 % resp. in the pandemic period and +10.1 % and −2.6 % in the post-pandemic period compared with the pre-pandemic period. ConclusionsA decrease of antibiotic prescriptions was observed in GPs and pediatricians during the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by a return to pre-pandemic levels. The patterns in antibiotic prescriptions aligned with the epidemiology of respiratory infections and demonstrated a pronounced association with the implementation and subsequent removal of non-pharmaceutical interventions.

Public Health Surveillance of Outpatient Antibiotic Prescription Trends, United States, 2011-2019.

Public Health Surveillance of Outpatient Antibiotic Prescription Trends, United States, 2011-2019.

Optimal Pediatric Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing

In the US, 50% of all pediatric outpatient antibiotics prescribed are unnecessary or inappropriate. Less is known about the appropriateness of pediatric outpatient antibiotic prescribing. To identify the overall percentage of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions that are optimal according to guideline recommendations for first-line antibiotic choice and duration. This cross-sectional study obtained data on any clinical encounter for a patient younger than 20 years with at least 1 outpatient oral antibiotic, intramuscular ceftriaxone, or penicillin prescription filled in the state of Tennessee from January 1 to December 31, 2022, from IQVIA's Longitudinal Prescription Claims and Medical Claims databases. Each clinical encounter was assigned a single diagnosis corresponding to the lowest applicable tier in a 3-tier antibiotic tier system. Antibiotics prescribed for tier 1 (nearly always required) or tier 2 (sometimes required) diagnoses were compared with published national guidelines. Antibiotics prescribed for tier 3 (rarely ever required) diagnoses were considered to be suboptimal for both choice and duration. Primary outcome was the percentage of optimal antibiotic prescriptions consistent with guideline recommendations for first-line antibiotic choice and duration. Secondary outcomes were the associations of optimal prescribing by diagnosis, suboptimal antibiotic choice, and patient- and clinician-level factors (ie, age and Social Vulnerability Index) with optimal antibiotic choice, which were measured by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs calculated using a multivariable logistic regression model. A total of 506 633 antibiotics were prescribed in 488 818 clinical encounters (for 247 843 females [50.7%]; mean [SD] age, 8.36 [5.5] years). Of these antibiotics, 21 055 (4.2%) were for tier 1 diagnoses, 288 044 (56.9%) for tier 2 diagnoses, and 197 660 (39.0%) for tier 3 diagnoses. Additionally, 194 906 antibiotics (38.5%) were optimal for antibiotic choice, 259 786 (51.3%) for duration, and 159 050 (31.4%) for both choice and duration. Acute otitis media (AOM) and pharyngitis were the most common indications, with 85 635 of 127 312 (67.3%) clinical encounters for AOM and 42 969 of 76 865 (55.9%) clinical encounters for pharyngitis being optimal for antibiotic choice. Only 257 of 4472 (5.7%) antibiotics prescribed for community-acquired pneumonia had a 5-day duration. Optimal antibiotic choice was more likely in patients who were younger (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.98) and were less socially vulnerable (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86). This cross-sectional study found that less than one-third of antibiotics prescribed to pediatric outpatients in Tennessee were optimal for choice and duration. Four stewardship interventions may be targeted: (1) reduce the number of prescriptions for tier 3 diagnoses, (2) increase optimal prescribing for AOM and pharyngitis, (3) provide clinician education on shorter antibiotic treatment courses for community-acquired pneumonia, and (4) promote optimal antibiotic prescribing in resource-limited settings.

Prescription of oral antibiotics and its appropriateness for outpatients in a tertiary care hospital in Korea

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have gained prominence with increased awareness regarding the importance of appropriate antibiotic use. However, ASP implementation for outpatient antibiotic prescriptions is uncommon, particularly in South Korea. This study aimed to analyse the patterns and appropriateness of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions at a tertiary care hospital in Korea. We analysed the patterns of oral antibiotic prescription from June 1, 2018 to May 31, 2023, at the outpatient department of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Appropriateness was assessed for prescriptions issued between May 15 and May 19, 2023. The assessment criteria included: indications for antibiotic use, antibiotic choice, duration, dose, and frequency. Pharmacists and infectious diseases specialists performed evaluations. A total of 7,282,407 outpatient visits were recorded within the 5-year duration. Of these, 243,967 (3.4%) were prescribed oral antibiotics. The frequency of antibiotic prescription was highest in dentistry, dermatology, and urology departments. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were cephalosporins, penicillins, and sulphonamides. Of the 423 prescriptions evaluated, 289 (68.3%) and 134 (31.7%) were for treatment and prophylaxis, respectively. Inappropriate prescriptions were identified in 28.4% (82/289) and 70.9% (95/134) of the treatment and prophylaxis cases, respectively. The primary reason for inadequacy in both treatment and prophylaxis was inappropriate indications, accounting for 46.3% (38/82) of treatment prescriptions and 96.8% (92/95) of prophylaxis prescriptions. Antibiotics were administered in 3.4% of all outpatient visits, with 28.4% of treatment and 70.9% of prophylactic antibiotics prescribed inappropriately. Proactive and expansive ASP activities by pharmacists should be considered in outpatient settings.

Association between antibiotic usage during infancy and asthma incidence among children: a population-level ecological study in British Columbia, Canada.

This study follows published associations in BC to 2014 (updated in 2019) to model the predicted incidence of asthma in BC children attributable to antibiotic use within the context of reduced antibiotic use and increased breastfeeding in BC infants from 2000 to 2019. A population-based ecological study was conducted in BC from 2000 to 2019, using outpatient antibiotic prescription data from BC PharmaNet and asthma diagnoses from the Chronic Disease Registry. Breastfeeding estimates were calculated using the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). Population attributable risk (PAR) was calculated using a blended relative risk (RR) of asthma in antibiotic-exposed children who were and were not breastfed. PAR was used to calculate predicted vs. actual asthma incidence in 2019. Negative binomial regression was used to estimate the association between the average antibiotic prescription rate in infants under 1 and asthma incidence in 1-4 year olds, stratified by periods between 2000-2014 and 2015-2019. In BC, antibiotic prescribing decreased by 77% in infants under 1 and asthma incidence decreased by 41% in children 1-4 years from 2000 to 2019. BC breastfeeding rates increased from 46% in the 2005 CCHS to 71% in the 2017/18 CCHS. After calculating the PAR using a blended RR, the predicted asthma incidence in 2019 was 18.8/1,000 population. This was comparable to the observed asthma incidence in children 1-4 years of 16.6/1,000 population in 2019. During 2000-2014, adjusted incidence risk ratio (aIRR) for children under Quintile 5 of average antibiotic prescribing was 1.75 (95% CI: 1.63-1.88, P < 0.0001) times higher than that for Quintile 1. However, between 2015 and 2019, this association weakened (as expected because of increasing prevalence of breastfeeding), with the expected asthma incidence for Quintile 5 only 11% (aIRR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.78-1.57) higher than for Quintile 1. We identified that over the past 20 years, antibiotic exposure in infants under 1 and asthma incidence in children 1-4 years has decreased significantly. Decreasing antibiotic exposure and increasing breastfeeding (which further mitigates risk associated with antibiotics) are of sufficient scale to explain much of this population trend. Changes in environmental, social and other exposures remain relevant to this complicated etiological pathway.

Perspectives of paediatric providers on antibiotic stewardship in a high-prescribing rural region.

Understanding drivers of antibiotic use is key to limiting the development of antimicrobial resistance. Outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates vary substantially across and within states. Kentucky is one of the highest prescribing states, and the southeastern region has rates that are drastically higher than the national average and urban areas of the state. We sought to examine provider perceptions of antibiotic use in this rural area to more effectively guide future interventions and policy. This study utilized Medicaid prescription claims to identify providers who frequently prescribe antibiotics to children in southeastern Kentucky. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted to elicit provider perspectives on antibiotic overuse. Individual, in-person interviews were conducted with 25 providers from a variety of practices and training backgrounds (private, nonprofit, retail, physician, advanced practice registered nurses, etc.). The following themes emerged as issues that prescribers consider to contribute to antibiotic overuse: (1) caregiver pressure, especially from grandparents or families who desire a 'quick fix'; (2) business concerns and competitionand (3) cultural factors related to poverty and rural locations. Interviewed providers were supportive of public education and had mixed views on the effectiveness of delayed fill or provider feedback initiatives. This study highlights unique challenges associated with antibiotic prescribing in rural areas. Findings will guide future interventions through adaptation of existing strategies to better serve this vulnerable population.

Changes in outpatient antibiotic prescriptions by U.S. physicians and advanced practice providers, 2011 and 2022

Background: The number of advanced practice providers (APPs)—nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)—continues to expand across the United States. Several studies suggest differences in antibiotic prescribing rates and appropriateness by APPs compared to physicians. The objective of this analysis is to characterize population- and provider-specific outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates among physicians and APPs nationally, by state, and within urban versus rural counties. Methods: We estimated outpatient oral antibiotic prescription rates for 2011 and 2022 using county-level prescription dispensing data from IQVIA Xponent® (numerator) and population census estimates (denominator). Provider specialty denominators were provided by IQVIA, based on data from the American Medical Association. Counties were classified as urban or rural per the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics classification. National and state-level prescription volume, rates per 1000 population, and average number of prescriptions per provider were calculated for physicians, NPs, and PAs. We assessed the degree to which provider-specific rates explained the variance of the overall rate by state, using the coefficient of determination (r2) from Pearson’s correlation. Results: Between 2011 and 2022, overall U.S. antibiotic prescribing declined from 877 to 709 per 1000 population, a 19.2% relative reduction. The provider-specific proportion of the overall prescribing rate relatively decreased by 32% for physicians but increased by 157% for APPs (NPs 229%, PAs 86%; Figure 1). State-level antibiotic prescribing rates varied by provider type for both years, shifting towards proportionally greater APP prescribing in 2022 (Figure 2). For 2011 and 2022, physician prescribing rate strongly correlated with the overall state rate (r2 = 0.83 in 2011 versus 0.80 in 2022), whereas the correlation of the NP prescribing rate increased (r2 = 0.20 in 2011 versus 0.76 in 2022). A total of 60,327 (7.2%) physicians practiced in rural settings in contrast to 42,876 (12%) NPs and 14,495 (9.4%) PAs in 2022. Providers in rural counties prescribed more antibiotics per provider on average compared to urban counties; rural physicians prescribed 57% more antibiotics per provider (207 vs 132 antibiotics per provider), rural NPs prescribed 115% more (284 vs 132), and rural PAs prescribed 53% more (289 vs 189). Conclusions: The relative contribution of APPs to outpatient antibiotic prescriptions more than doubled over the past decade, accounting for 1 in 3 prescriptions in 2022. This contribution was especially prominent among NPs in rural counties. Further evaluation of antibiotic prescribing appropriateness among APPs and integration of APPs into antibiotic stewardship efforts in various settings.

Antibiotic Prescribing by General Dentists in the Outpatient Setting — United States, 2018–2022

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use impacts patient safety and antimicrobial resistance patterns. In 2013, general dentists in the U.S. prescribed nearly 10% of all outpatient oral antibiotics (24.5 million prescriptions). The American Dental Association (ADA) published guidelines in 2019 recommending limited antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of dental pain and swelling. We characterized dental prescribing during 2018–2022 to assess whether antibiotic use decreased after the guideline’s release. In addition, we examined access to dental care. Methods: All antibiotic prescriptions dispensed during 2018–2022 were extracted from the IQVIA Xponent database, which captured ≥92% of all U.S. outpatient prescriptions and projected to 100% coverage. Prescriptions by general dentists were compared to total outpatient oral antibiotic prescriptions and summarized by patient sex, patient age, and prescriber geographic region. Census denominators were used to calculate prescribing rates per 1,000 persons. IQVIA general dentist counts were used to calculate dentists per 100,000 persons. Results: General dentists prescribed 24.7 million antibiotic prescriptions in 2018 (75 prescriptions per 1,000 persons) compared with 25.2 million (76 prescriptions per 1,000 persons) in 2022. During 2020–2022, general dentists prescribed &gt;10% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions (range 10.7%–12.1%). In each year, prescription rates were higher for females, patients &gt; 65 years, and among prescribers in the Northeast. In 2022, there were 58 general dentists per 100,000 persons in the United States. The highest general dentist rate was in District of Columbia (100 per 100,000 persons) and the lowest rate was in Delaware (41 per 100,000 persons). Conclusions: Despite the ADA’s 2019 guidelines, prescribing by general dentists remained stable during 2018–2022. Because the total number of antibiotic prescriptions overall decreased, general dentists’ share of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions increased to &gt;10% in recent years. Rate variation by patient characteristics and prescriber region may reflect differences in dental disease burden or may represent unnecessary antibiotic use. Dental antibiotic stewardship is needed, including dissemination and implementation of current prescribing guidelines. Further evaluation of prescribing indications and access to dental care is needed to inform dental stewardship priorities.

Implementation of Outpatient Automated Stewardship Information System (OASIS©) Audit and Feedback in Two Healthcare Systems

Background: Combating antibiotic resistance, exacerbated by widespread unnecessary outpatient antibiotic prescriptions, necessitates innovative stewardship solutions. Audit and feedback reports are effective but often resource heavy. We introduced a free, open-source system, Outpatient Automated Stewardship Information System (OASIS©), for automating the creation and distribution of recurring audit and feedback reports to clinicians to improve antibiotic prescribing. Methods: We used mixed methods to evaluate implementation of OASIS© across 11 clinics at Denver Health and Hospital Authority (DHHA) and Children’s Hospital Colorado (CHCO) from July 2022 to August 2023. Both sites host their own Epic® electronic healthcare and enterprise data warehouse systems. R statistical software was utilized to retrieve and process the data needed to create individual[HCM1] clinician audit and feedback reports with peer comparison. Reports were provided for 1) antibiotics prescribed for respiratory diagnoses, 2) antibiotics prescribed for respiratory diagnoses where antibiotics are never indicated, 3) first-line antibiotic prescribing for acute otitis media (AOM), and 4) five-day duration of antibiotics for children two years and older with AOM. Feedback reports for each metric were emailed to clinicians for three consecutive months. The primary outcome was adaptations needed to implement OASIS©. Secondary outcomes included fidelity (measured by email readership), time to set up and maintain the program, and barriers and facilitators to implementation (assessed by four qualitative interviews with OASIS© stakeholders). Results: The most significant adaptations made pertained to the automation of OASIS© reports for organizations not using R for data retrieval and reporting, setting up OASIS© specific email addresses, and validating clinician fidelity via read receipts. Fidelity was higher at DHHA (91-100%) compared to CHCO (10-30%). When interviewed, data analysts expressed that time for initial setup ranged from 1-6 hours. After reporting was automated, the estimated monthly time to send reports was 10 minutes. Views on setup complexity were split, but all recognized the readability of the reports and OASIS©’s value for improving prescribing behaviors. The greatest barriers to implementation included obtaining analytic resources for initial setup and the need to download additional R packages. No interviewee had prior experience creating audit and feedback reports. Conclusions: Implementing OASIS© requires addressing system diversity and knowledge gaps in outpatient informatics and antibiotic stewardship. Despite these challenges, the tool proved efficient and beneficial for monitoring and reporting antimicrobial prescribing. This free tool could likely be effectively disseminated to other health systems given the limited time and resources required for adaptations, setup, and monitoring. [HCM1]I

Quality of antibiotic prescribing for outpatient cystitis in adult females

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are responsible for a significant portion of female, outpatient antibiotic prescriptions. Especially true in uncomplicated cases, where symptoms remain the cornerstone of diagnosis, ensuring the optimal choice of agent, dose, and duration may mitigate future bacterial resistance and lower the likelihood of adverse events and/or recurrence. This study is the first in Canada to examine the quality of antibiotic prescribing to females in the outpatient setting, for uncomplicated UTI–by agent, dose, and duration. Methods: All adult female residents of British Columbia with a physician record for cystitis from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, were identified. Patients with a history of urologic abnormalities, spinal cord injury, catheter use, kidney transplant, as well as pregnant females, were excluded. Primary outcomes included the proportion of total episodes prescribed and the proportion of appropriate antibiotic use, examined using Poisson regression. Results: A total of 182,162 episodes of cystitis were examined, with 70% receiving an antibiotic prescription. The rate of cystitis-associated prescribing was 697 prescriptions per 1,000 population. Overall, 35% of prescriptions were appropriate by guideline adherence or clinical justification. Nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, accounted for 71% of total antibiotic use. Seven days was the most commonly dispensed duration of therapy, followed by 5, then 10. Conclusions: Shortening length of therapy in line with clinical guidelines and encouraging the use of first line agents present clear, actionable targets for provincial stewardship efforts.

Effect of pediatric Tuina on children's recurrent acute respiratory tract infections: a retrospective cohort study in Southern China.

To determine the effectiveness of pediatric Tuina (PT) in preventing recurrent acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in children. This is a retrospective cohort study based on the electronic medical records of children with recurrent ARTIs in 2016. Children were divided into a PT group or a non-PT group, according to whether they had received PT or not in 2016. The primary outcome was the number of ARTI episodes in 2017 and 2018. The secondary outcomes were the number of ARTIs leading to outpatient department visits and outpatient antibiotic prescriptions due to ARTIs in the same time period. Negative binomial regressions were used to detect the association between PT and the outcomes. A total of 2303 children were included in the analysis, including 94 in the PT group and 2209 in the non-PT group. Children who received PT six or more times in 2016 had fewer episodes of ARTIs in 2017 [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.42-0.84)] and 2018 [IRR: 0.58, 95% CI (0.36-0.94)] and fewer outpatient department visits due to ARTIs in 2017 [IRR: 0.56, 95% CI (0.38-0.83)] than children who had not received PT in 2016. There was no significant difference in the number of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions between the two groups. Receiving PT six or more times within one year is associated with a decrease in recurrent ARTIs in children in the following two years. Randomized controlled trials are needed for effect evaluation prior to establishing PT as a method for preventing recurrent ARTIs among children.

Antibiotic appropriateness at outpatient settings in Ethiopia: the need for an antibiotic stewardship programme.

Antibiotics are drugs of natural or synthetic origin used to treat various infections. The practice of excessive and inappropriate antibiotics use is the main global cause of bacterial resistance, which is one of the most serious global public health threats. It is estimated that about 50% of global antibiotic prescriptions are inappropriate. This study assesses the prevalence and pattern of inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics amongst ambulatory care visits in Ethiopia. A facility-based, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted amongst randomly selected prescriptions issued for outpatients from May to June 2022 at Debre Markos Specialized Comprehensive Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages, were computed. For group comparisons, χ2 and independent sample t-tests were computed. The statistical significance of the association was considered at p<0.05. A total of 2640 antibiotics were prescribed for patients in the outpatient setting with various bacterial infections via 911 prescriptions, of which 49.5% were non-compliant with the national treatment guideline. Guideline non-compliant prescriptions increased remarkably amongst patients in the outpatient setting diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (38.8% versus 30.1%; p=0.006) and peptic ulcer disease (14.9% versus 9%; p=0.006). Moreover, inappropriate prescription was significantly higher amongst patients taking amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (33.2% versus 48.2%; p<0.001) and cephalexin (17.8% versus 24.3%; p=0.016). Large proportions of antibiotic prescriptions for outpatients were non-compliant with the national treatment guideline, suggesting that prescribers need to give special attention to outpatients whilst ordering antibiotics such as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cephalexin. Antibiotic stewardship efforts to optimize outpatient antibiotic prescriptions and reduce the use of potentially inappropriate antibiotics are needed in Ethiopia.

Drivers of district-level differences in outpatient antibiotic prescribing in Germany: a qualitative study with prescribers

BackgroundPrevious studies have identified substantial regional variations in outpatient antibiotic prescribing in Germany, both in the paediatric and adult population. This indicates inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in some regions, which should be avoided to reduce antimicrobial resistance and potential side effects. The reasons for regional variations in outpatient antibiotic prescribing are not yet completely understood; socioeconomic and health care density differences between regions do not fully explain such differences. Here, we apply a behavioural perspective by adapting the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to examine regional factors deemed relevant for outpatient antibiotic prescriptions by paediatricians and general practitioners.MethodsQualitative study with guideline-based telephone interviews of 40 prescribers (paediatricians and general practitioners) in outpatient settings from regions with high and low rates of antibiotic prescriptions, stratified by urbanity. TDF domains formed the basis of an interview guide to assess region-level resources and barriers to rational antibiotic prescription behaviour. Interviews lasted 30–61 min (M = 45 min). Thematic analysis was used to identify thematic clusters, and relationships between themes were explored through proximity estimation.ResultsBoth paediatricians and general practitioners in low-prescribing regions reported supporting contextual factors (in particular good collegial networks, good collaboration with laboratories) and social factors (collegial support and low patient demand for antibiotics) as important resources. In high-prescribing regions, poor coordination between in-patient and ambulatory health services, lack of region-level information on antimicrobial resistance, few professional development opportunities, and regional variations in patient expectations were identified as barriers to rational prescribing behaviour.ConclusionsInterventions targeting professional development, better collaboration structures with laboratories and clearer and user-friendly guidelines could potentially support rational antibiotic prescribing behaviour. In addition, better networking and social support among physicians could support lower prescription rates.

The Effect of COVID-19 Vaccination on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing in Older Adults: A Self-Controlled Risk-Interval Study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been associated with reduced outpatient antibiotic prescribing among older adults with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We assessed the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on outpatient antibiotic prescribing in the broader population of older adults, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection status. We included adults aged ≥65 years who received their first, second, and/or third COVID-19 vaccine dose from December 2020 to December 2022. We used a self-controlled risk-interval design and included cases who received an antibiotic prescription 2-6 weeks before vaccination (pre-vaccination or control interval) or after vaccination (post-vaccination or risk interval). We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds of being prescribed (1) any antibiotic, (2) a typical "respiratory" infection antibiotic, or (3) a typical "urinary tract" infection antibiotic (negative control) in the post-vaccination interval versus the pre-vaccination interval. We accounted for temporal changes in antibiotic prescribing using background monthly antibiotic prescribing counts. 469 923 vaccine doses met inclusion criteria. The odds of receiving any antibiotic or a respiratory antibiotic prescription were lower in the post-vaccination versus pre-vaccination interval (aOR, .973; 95% CI, .968-.978; aOR, .961; 95% CI, .953-.968, respectively). There was no association between vaccination and urinary antibiotic prescriptions (aOR, .996; 95% CI, .987-1.006). Periods with high (>10%) versus low (<5%) SARS-CoV-2 test positivity demonstrated greater reductions in antibiotic prescribing (aOR, .875; 95% CI, .845-.905; aOR, .996; 95% CI, .989-1.003, respectively). COVID-19 vaccination was associated with reduced outpatient antibiotic prescribing in older adults, especially during periods of high SARS-CoV-2 circulation.

Changes in the Appropriateness of US Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing After the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis of 2016-2021 Data.

No national study has evaluated changes in the appropriateness of US outpatient antibiotic prescribing across all conditions and age groups after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in March 2020. This was an interrupted time series analysis of Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database, a national commercial and Medicare Advantage claims database. Analyses included prescriptions for antibiotics dispensed to children and adults enrolled during each month during 2017-2021. For each prescription, we applied our previously developed antibiotic appropriateness classification scheme to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes on medical claims occurring on or during the 3 days prior to dispensing. Outcomes included the monthly proportion of antibiotic prescriptions that were inappropriate and the monthly proportion of enrollees with ≥1 inappropriate prescription. Using segmented regression models, we assessed for level and slope changes in outcomes in March 2020. Analyses included 37 566 581 enrollees, of whom 19 154 059 (51.0%) were female. The proportion of enrollees with ≥1 inappropriate prescription decreased in March 2020 (level decrease: -0.80 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, -1.09% to -.51%]) and subsequently increased (slope increase: 0.02 percentage points per month [95% CI, .01%-.03%]), partly because overall antibiotic dispensing rebounded and partly because the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions that were inappropriate increased (slope increase: 0.11 percentage points per month [95% CI, .04%-.18%]). In December 2021, the proportion of enrollees with ≥1 inappropriate prescription equaled the corresponding proportion in December 2019. Despite an initial decline, the proportion of enrollees exposed to inappropriate antibiotics returned to baseline levels by December 2021. Findings underscore the continued importance of outpatient antibiotic stewardship initiatives.

Drivers of Geographic Patterns in Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing in the United States.

In a retrospective, ecological analysis of US medical claims, visit rates explained more of the geographic variation in outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates than per-visit prescribing. Efforts to reduce antibiotic use may benefit from addressing the factors that drive higher rates of outpatient visits, in addition to continued focus on stewardship.

Outpatient Visits and Antibiotic Use Due to Higher-Valency Pneumococcal Vaccine Serotypes.

In 2022-2023, 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15/PCV20) were recommended for infants. We aimed to estimate the incidence of outpatient visits and antibiotic prescriptions in US children (≤17 years) from 2016-2019 for acute otitis media, pneumonia, and sinusitis associated with PCV15- and PCV20-additional (non-PCV13) serotypes to quantify PCV15/20 potential impacts. We estimated the incidence of PCV15/20-additional serotype-attributable visits and antibiotic prescriptions as the product of all-cause incidence rates, derived from national health care surveys and MarketScan databases, and PCV15/20-additional serotype-attributable fractions. We estimated serotype-specific attributable fractions using modified vaccine-probe approaches incorporating incidence changes post-PCV13 and ratios of PCV13 versus PCV15/20 serotype frequencies, estimated through meta-analyses. Per 1000 children annually, PCV15-additional serotypes accounted for an estimated 2.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.9) visits and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.6-3.4) antibiotic prescriptions. PCV20-additional serotypes resulted in 15.0 (95% CI, 11.2-20.4) visits and 13.2 (95% CI, 9.9-18.0) antibiotic prescriptions annually per 1000 children. PCV15/20-additional serotypes account for 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.6%) and 2.1% (95% CI, 1.5%-3.0%) of pediatric outpatient antibiotic use. Compared with PCV15-additional serotypes, PCV20-additional serotypes account for > 5 times the burden of visits and antibiotic prescriptions. Higher-valency PCVs, especially PCV20, may contribute to preventing pediatric pneumococcal respiratory infections and antibiotic use.

Selection of proxy indicators estimating the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in general practice: a national consensus procedure in France.

GPs are responsible for more than 70% of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in France. Metrics are important antibiotic stewardship tools that can be used to set targets for improvement and to give feedback to professionals and stakeholders. The primary objective of the present study was to select a set of proxy indicators (PIs) based on 10 previously developed PIs, to estimate the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions by GPs. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the selected PIs. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus procedure was conducted with a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders. This procedure consisted of two successive online surveys with a consensus meeting in between. Clinimetric properties (measurability, applicability and potential room for improvement) were evaluated for the PIs selected through the consensus procedure, using 2022 Regional Health Insurance data. Seventeen experts participated in the first-round survey and 14 in the second-round. A final set of 12 PIs was selected. Among the 10 initial PIs, 3 were selected without modification and 7 were modified and selected. Moreover, two newly suggested PIs were selected. Ten of the 12 PIs presented good clinimetric properties. The 12 selected PIs cover the main situations responsible for inappropriate and unnecessary use of antibiotics in general practice. These PIs, easily calculable using routinely collected health insurance reimbursement data, might be used to give feedback to prescribers and stakeholders and help improve antibiotic prescriptions in primary care.

Identifying prescribers of antibiotics in a primary care spinal cord injury cohort.

A retrospective cross-sectional study. To identify who prescribes outpatient antibiotics among a primary care spinal cord injury (SCI) cohort. ICES databases in Ontario, Canada. A cohort of individuals with SCI were retrospectively identified using a tested-algorithm and chart reviews in a primary care electronic medical records database. The cohort was linked to a drug dispensing database to obtain outpatient antibiotic prescribing information, and prescriber details were obtained from a physician database. Final cohort included three hundred and twenty individuals with SCI. The average annual number of antibiotic courses dispensed for the SCI cohort was 2.0 ± 6.2. For dispensed antibiotics, 58.9% were prescribed by rostered-primary care practice physicians, compared to 17.9% by emergency and non-rostered primary care physicians, 17.4% by specialists and 6.1% by non-physician prescribers. Those who lived in urban areas and rural areas, compared to those who lived in suburban areas, were more likely to receive antibiotics from emergency and non-rostered primary care physicians than from rostered-primary care practice physicians. Although individuals with SCI received outpatient antibiotic prescriptions from multiple sources, physicians from an individual's rostered-primary care practice were the main antibiotic prescribers. As such, interventions to optimize antibiotics use in the SCI population should target the primary care practice.