Outcomes Of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Research Articles

Treatment outcomes of non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasia: A retrospective study at a tertiary care center in the United States.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer; additional treatment may be recommended for patients in whom resection is not curative per the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess treatment outcomes of ESD for gastric neoplasia, with a focus on cases of non-curative resection. This was a retrospective study of all individuals undergoing ESD for the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma or dysplasia in a high-volume tertiary care center in the United States. Data on patient demographic characteristics, clinical history, lesion characteristics, and procedural and clinical outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record. Among 82 cases undergoing ESD for the management of gastric neoplasia, 32 cases resulted in non-curative resection. 20 of these non-curative cases did not get additional treatment, among which recurrence occurred in two cases with positive horizontal margins only. These patients did not show lymph node metastasis and underwent further endoscopic or surgical resection. There was no recurrence in 11 cases with undifferentiated carcinomas of ≤2 cm in size. Although this study was limited by its retrospective design, small sample size, and follow-up duration, our findings suggest that a risk-adapted strategy could be employed for certain patients undergoing non-curative ESD per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopyguidelines, with close follow-up instead of routine surgery in select cases with favorable features. Further studies are needed to refine the criteria for additional treatment after non-curative ESD in Western populations.

Endoluminal Approaches for Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, A Viable Alternative for Colectomy?

IntroductionEndoscopic resection of visible dysplastic lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) provides an alternative to colectomy for management. Endoscopic techniques that can be used include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and a combined hybrid approach of ESD and EMR. These endoscopic treatments may allow organ preservation in patients with IBD. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of endoscopic resection, including EMR, ESD and hybrid ESD/EMR, for the treatment of colorectal dysplasia in patients with IBD. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of IBD patients who underwent endoscopic resection for colorectal dysplasia at our tertiary care center between 2014 to 2023. Patients were identified through a search of our endoscopy database. Medical records were reviewed to collect data on patient demographics, IBD history, details of endoscopic technique, procedural factors, final pathology results, and outcomes including recurrence of dysplasia. ResultsA total of 50 IBD patients underwent endoscopic resection, including 38 ESD, 11 hybrid ESD/EMR, and 1 EMR. Median age was 62 (IQR: 54-68) years and 34 (68%) were male. Median BMI was 27.6 (IQR: 24.8-31.7). Underlying diagnosis was ulcerative colitis in 33 (66%) and Crohn's disease in 17 (33%). Median disease duration was 27.5 years (IQR 8-30). Polyp locations were distributed as follows: right colon, rectum, left colon, transverse colon, and cecum, with 9 (18%) in each area. Median procedure time was 47.5minutes (IQR: 31.2-73.7). En bloc resection was achieved in 34 (68%) and piecemeal resection in 16 (32%). On pathology, median lesion size was 23.5 (IQR: 20.2-40) mm. High-grade dysplasia was found in 7 (14%) and low-grade dysplasia in 15 (30%). During a median follow-up period of 7.2 years, 18% of patients experienced recurrence. No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between the ESD and ESD/EMR groups. ConclusionEndoscopic resection, including EMR, ESD and hybrid techniques, enables effective treatment of visible dysplastic lesions as an alternative to colectomy in patients with IBD. In this cohort, favorable short-term outcomes were demonstrated after endoscopic resection.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastrointestinal Cancer-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.

Background: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) has become the standard therapy for early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and has shown as good oncological surgery results. Approximately 30% of ESDs do not meet the criteria for oncological curability, and upfront surgery is indicated. Hence, about 40% of patients with an indication for surgery are advised against surgery because of comorbidities and an advanced age. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study on the long-term outcomes of non-curative ESDs, performed between 2009 and May 2024, without additional tumor therapy. The primary outcome was the recurrence of malignancy, either local malignancy or lymph node metastasis during follow-up, or death. We compared the outcomes between two cohorts: after non-curative ESD (ncESD) and after curative ESD (cESD). Results: A total of 374 ESDs were analyzed in this study. Overall, the technical success rate was 91%, and the oncological curative resection criteria were met in 70.9% of patients. Severe complications occurred in 5% of cases without procedure-associated mortality. In the ncESD group, 20% (7/35) of patients had a recurrence of malignancy primarily due to positive horizontal margins in the resection specimens, and 3 out of 35 died due to a non-oncological reason during the follow-up (mean length 36.6 months). In the cESD group, 3% (1/33) of patients had tumor recurrence, and 1 patient died because of a non-oncological reason. The tumor recurrence rate between the cohorts was significant (p = 0.017), and overall mortality did not show significance (p = 0.33). Conclusions: Especially in the elderly and multimorbid patients, the recommendation to perform rescue surgery after non-curative ESD remains challenging. Residual malignancy rates in surgical resection specimens are low, recurrence rates of malignancy are low, and mortality rates for non-oncological reasons are high in this population. There is a need for more data for the individualization of patient management after non-curative ESD.

Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Neoplasms Extending to the Dentate Line: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a superior, minimally invasive technique compared with other snare-based endoscopic resection techniques for rectal neoplasms extending to the dentate line (RNDLs). However, performing a successful ESD in the anal canal can be challenging due to vascularity and limited scope stability. In this meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for RNDLs. We performed a comprehensive electronic database search from January 2005 through January 2024 for studies evaluating outcomes of ESD performed for managing RNDLs. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effect models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and Q statistics. Data were extracted from 11 studies comprising 496 patients. The pooled en bloc resection rates were 93.60% (95% CI = 90.70-95.70). The pooled R0 resection rate was 80.60% (95% CI = 70.50-87.80). The pooled recurrence rate was 4.00% (95% CI = 2.40-6.50). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity calculated using the Q test and I2 statistic. The main adverse events were anal pain, postprocedural bleeding, and anal stricture with pooled rates of 20.20% (95% CI = 14.80-26.90), 8.20% (95% CI = 4.70-14.0), and 3.50% (95% CI = 2.10-5.70), respectively. ESD is a safe and effective option for managing RNDLs with a low recurrence rate. Adverse events such as postprocedural perianal pain, postprocedural bleeding, and anal stenosis seem to be more common compared with colorectal ESD done for more proximal lesions. However, these can typically be managed conservatively or with minimally invasive endoscopic techniques.

Short-term outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clutch cutter for subepithelial lesions within the esophagogastric submucosa: a Japanese prospective observational study.

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clutch cutter (ESD-CC) for subepithelial lesions within the esophagogastric submucosa (SELEGSM) has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ESD-CC for the treatment of SELEGSM. This prospective study included 15 consecutive patients with 18 SELEGSMs diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography. The primary outcomes were short-term outcomes including en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, procedure time, and complication rate. The secondary outcome was final histological diagnosis. Among the participants, 18 lesions were identified: 12 in the stomach (nine patients) and six in the esophagus (six patients). The en bloc resection rate was 94.4% (17/18). The R0 resection rate was 88.9% (16/18). The median operating time was 39 min, and no instances of perforation or bleeding were observed. The final diagnoses of SELEGSM included six neuroendocrine tumors (33.3%), six granular cell tumors (33.3%), two ectopic pancreases (11.1%), one inflammatory fibroid polyp (5.6%), one leiomyoma (5.6%), one lipoma (5.6%), and one leiomyosarcoma (5.6%). ESD-CC appears to be a technically efficient and safe approach for SELEGSM resection, suggesting its potential as a valuable treatment option.

S1645 Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection versus Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection for Complex Colorectal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

S1645 Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection versus Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection for Complex Colorectal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for Barrett’s-associated neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature

Abstract Background The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of Barrett esophagus-associated neoplasia (BEN) has been evolving. We examined the efficacy and safety of ESD and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for BEN. Methods A database search was performed for studies reporting efficacy and safety outcomes of ESD and EMR for BEN. Pooled proportional and comparative meta-analyses were performed. Results 47 studies (23 ESD, 19 EMR, 5 comparative) were included. The mean lesion sizes for ESD and EMR were 22.5 mm and 15.8 mm, respectively; most lesions were Paris type IIa. For ESD, pooled analysis showed rates of en bloc, R0, and curative resection, and local recurrence of 98%, 78%, 65%, and 2%, respectively. Complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were achieved in 94% and 59% of cases, respectively. Pooled rates of perforation, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, and stricture were 1%, 1%, 2%, and 10%, respectively. For EMR, pooled analysis showed rates of en bloc, R0, and curative resection, and local recurrence of 37%, 67%, 62%, and 6%, respectively. Complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were achieved in 94% and 75% of cases. Pooled rates of perforation, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, and stricture were 0.1%, 1%, 0.4%, and 8%, respectively. The mean procedure times for ESD and EMR were 113 and 22 minutes, respectively. Comparative analysis showed higher en bloc and R0 resection rates with ESD compared with EMR, with comparable adverse events. Conclusion ESD and EMR can both be employed to treat BEN depending on lesion type and size, and center expertise.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal adenocarcinoma in the Eastern population: a comprehensive analysis

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a preferred method for early esophageal cancer, yet its application to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), especially in the Eastern population with its relative rarity, lacks sufficient literature. This study evaluated ESD’s long-term outcomes for EAC, focusing on noncurative resections and diagnostic accuracy. MethodsBetween 2012 and 2022, a retrospective study included 68 patients undergoing ESD for early EAC at Jiangsu Province Hospital. Primary outcomes encompassed ESD efficacy, en bloc resection, R0 resection, curative resection rates, and follow-up. Secondary outcomes involved noncurative ESD, T1a/T1b stage comparison, and diagnostic consistency. ResultsPostoperative staging revealed T1a (n = 53) and T1b tumors (n = 15). En bloc resection rate was 97.1%, R0 resection rate was 79.4%, and noncurative rate was 30.9%. T1a had significantly higher R0 rate and curative resection rate. Among noncurative ESDs, 33.3% underwent esophagectomy, 42.9% had surveillance endoscopies, 19.1% repeated curative ESD, and 4.7% were lost to follow-up. Average follow-up was 63.76 ± 28.47 months. Furthermore, 6 patients had recurrence, 3 had residual lesions, and 6 deaths occurred, unrelated to ESD. No significant difference in survival or recurrence rates between curative and noncurative ESD groups was observed. ESD led to a histologic diagnosis change in 70.6% of cases, all upstaged. ConclusionESD is effective for EAC, with higher curative rates for T1a than T1b. Noncurative ESD cases may benefit from conservative approaches. Long-term follow-up underscores poor consistency between residual lesions and positive margins. ESD serves as a valuable diagnostic staging tool, particularly for T1b cases, considering the low accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound and preoperative biopsy.

Outcomes of endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection in laterally spreading colorectal polyps: A tertiary care centre experience from India.

Endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) is an established endoscopic modality for the management of colorectal polyps. However, there are no studies regarding the outcomes of ESD from India. In this study, we aimed at evaluating the outcomes of ESD in patients with adenomatous polyps in the colon and rectum. Data of consecutive patients who underwent ESD for colorectal polyps from 2018 to 2021 were analyzed, retrospectively. The primary outcome of the study was the technical success of ESD. The secondary outcomes included the rate of histologically complete resection (R0), adverse events and recurrence. Seventy patients (63.5 years, 60% males) underwent ESD for polyps in colon and rectum. A majority were located in rectum (80%) and sigmoid colon (15.7%). Narrow band classification of the polyps was Japanese Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team (JNET)-2a in 50 (71.4%) and JNET-2b in 13 (18.6%) patients. ESD was technically successful in 64 (91.4%) patients using conventional technique (72.8%) and pocket or tunnellingtechnique (18.6%). There wereno major adverse events. Histologically RO was achieved in 58 (82.8%) patients and deep sub-mucosal invasion was noted in 12 patients. At a median follow-up of 19 (interquartile range [IQR] 15-27) months, recurrence was noticed in four(5.7%) patients all of which could be managed endoscopically. ESD, performed at a tertiary care centre in India, yields high rates of technical success and histologically R0, with a relatively low incidence of adverse events and recurrences.

Unveiling clinicopathologic features and outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer at gastric angulus in China

BackgroundWith advances in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique, an increasing number of the Chinese population are being diagnosed with early gastric cancers (EGCs) at gastric angulus. However, the relationship between gastric angulus and EGCs remains obscure.ObjectivesWe aimed to unveil the unreported location characteristics of gastric angulus in Chinese EGC patients and the correlation between the degree of submucosal fibrosis and ESD outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of EGC patients treated with ESD from January 2010 to March 2023. We retrospectively investigated and analyzed 740 EGC patients using multiple analyses.ResultsFollowing gastric antrum (53.1%), the gastric angulus (21.8%) emerged as the second-most prevalent site for EGCs. It had highest incidence of severe submucosal fibrosis and ulceration than the other parts. Multivariate analysis showed independent associations of submucosal fibrosis at the angulus with ulceration (OR: 3.714, 95% CI: 1.041–13.249), procedure duration (OR: 1.037, 95% CI: 1.014–1.061), and perforation complication (OR: 14.611, 95% CI: 1.626-131.277) (all P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe gastric angulus demonstrates the highest incidence of severe submucosal fibrosis and ulceration for EGCs identified by ESD. This condition is linked to unfavorable outcomes, typically increased perforation risks and prolonged operation duration. Therefore, meticulous dissection is crucial for patients with EGCs in the gastric angulus.

Long-Term Outcomes of Esophageal Squamous Neoplasia with Muscularis Mucosa Involvement after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Ambiguity exists over treatment and surveillance strategies after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell neoplasia (ESCN) with unfavorable histologic features. This study investigated the long-term outcomes of ESD in high-risk ESCN patients. We retrospectively included early ESCN patients treated with ESD at two medical centers in Taiwan between August 2010 and December 2023. Demographic, endoscopic and pathological data were collected. Among 146 patients (mean age 59.17 years) with 183 lesions, 73 (50%) had a history of head and neck cancer (HNC). En bloc and R0 resections were achieved in 100% and 95.6% of the lesions, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and local recurrence rates were 42.7%, 94.7% and 11%. R0 resections were significantly associated with recurrence in a univariate analysis (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.66, p = 0.008). Alcohol abstinence was independently associated with lower recurrence (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, p = 0.006). Patients with pT1a-MM (muscularis mucosa invasion) had comparable OS (p = 0.82), DSS (p = 0.617) and recurrence (p = 0.63) rates to those with pT1a-EP/LPM (epithelium/lamina propria invasion). The long-term outcomes of ESCN patients after ESD for expanded indications were satisfactory. ESD could be considered in selected ESCN patients involving the muscularis mucosa, notably among high-risk HNC patients.

A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip).

BACKGROUND The spring-and-loop with clip (S-O clip) consists of a spring and a nylon loop located on one side of the claws of the clip, and is used in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to allow countertraction. This retrospective study included 290 patients with early gastric neoplasms (eGNs) and aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of ESD with and without the use of the S-O clip. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the data of 347 patients with eGN who underwent ESD, with or without an S-O clip, at our institution between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Overall, 290 patients were analyzed after excluding ineligible participants. The control group (n=149; adenoma: 1, carcinoma: 148) underwent ESD without an S-O clip between April 2017 and March 2020, while the S-O group (n=141; adenoma: 4, carcinoma: 137) used the clip between April 2020 and March 2023. Primary outcomes included procedure time, en bloc resection rate, and complete resection rate. Subgroup analysis for examined procedure time concerning endoscopist expertise, submucosal fibrosis, and neoplasm locations. RESULTS The S-O group had a shorter procedure time (44.4±23.9 vs 61.1±40.9 min, P<0.001) and a higher complete resection rate (97.9% vs 92.6%, P<0.05) than the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed that the S-O clip significantly reduced procedure time for trainees compared to the control group (40.8±18.3 vs 61.1±35.6 min, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The scheduled use of S-O clips in gastric ESD is effective in improving procedural time and complete resection rates, benefiting endoscopists across all experience levels.

Early gastric cancer of young patients treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection: focusing on the different characteristics and prognosis of elderly patients.

A small portion of patients are diagnosed with early gastric cancer (EGC) and undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at a young age. However, their clinical outcomes are rarely known. We investigated to identify the feasibility and clinical outcomes of ESD for EGC focusing on young patients. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outscomes of patients who had undergone ESD for the treatment of EGC at < 50years of age. We enrolled patients who had been diagnosed with EGC and had undergone ESD between 2006 and 2020. We divided them by age as follows: ≤ 50 and > 50years into the young age (YA) and other age (OA) groups, respectively. Altogether, 1681 patients underwent ESD for EGC (YA group: 124 [7.4%], OA group: 1557 [92.6%]). The YA group had less severe atrophy and more undifferentiated (37.1% vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001) and diffuse type (25% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001) histology. The curative resection rate was not significantly different between the groups. However, among 1075 patients who had achieved curative resection and had been followed-up for > 12months, the YA group had a lower incidence of MGN (5.2% vs. 17.5%, P = 0.004) and MGC (2.6% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.019) than those exhibited by the OA group. The YA group was a significant negative predictor of MGN (odds ratio [OR]: 2.983, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.060-8.393, P = 0.038), and marginally negative predictor in MGC (OR: 3.909, 95% CI: 0.939-16.281, P = 0.061). ESD is a favorable and effective therapeutic modality for EGC patients aged < 50years, once curative resection is achieved.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated type early gastric cancer over 2 cm with R0 resection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for over 2 cm in size undifferentiated type (UD type) early gastric cancer (EGC) confined to the mucosa is not only challenging, but also long-term outcomes are not well known. To evaluate the long-term outcomes of ESD done for UD type EGCs confined to the mucosa over 2 cm in size and compare the results with those where the lesions were less than 2 cm. 143 patients with UD type EGC confirmed on histology after ESD at a tertiary hospital were reviewed. Cases with synchronous and metachronous lesions and a case with emergency surgery after ESD were excluded. A total of 137 cases were enrolled. 79 cases who underwent R0 resection were divided into 2 cm or less (group A) and over 2 cm (group B) in size. Among 79 patients who underwent R0 resection, the number in group A and B were 51 and 28, respectively. The mean follow-up period (SD) was 79.71 ± 45.42 months. There was a local recurrence in group A (1/51, 2%) and group B (1/28, 3.6%) respectively. This patient in group A underwent surgery while the patient in group B underwent repeated ESD with no further recurrences in both patients. There was no regional lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and deaths in both groups. With R0 resection strategy for ESD on lesions over 2 cm, 20.4% (28/137) of patients were able to avoid surgery compared with expanded indication. If R0 resection is achieved by ESD, UD type EGCs over 2 cm also showed good and similar clinical outcomes as compared to lesions less than 2 cm when followed for over 5 years. With R0 resection strategy, several patients can avoid surgery.

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for poorly differentiated superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A 10-year cohort study

BackgroundsThe efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to treat poorly differentiated superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) is unclear. AimsTo exploring the efficacy and prognosis of ESD treatment poorly differentiated SESCC compared with esophagectomy. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted, the data of poorly differentiated SESCC patients who received ESD or esophagectomy from Jan 2011 to Jan 2021 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and procedure-related variables were compared between ESD and esophagectomy group. Results95 patients underwent ESD, while 86 underwent esophagectomy. No significant differences were found between the two groups in OS (P = 0.587), DSS (P = 0.172), and RFS (P = 0.111). Oncologic outcomes were also similar between the two groups in propensity score–matched analysis. For T1a ESCC, the rates of R0 resection, LVI or nodal metastasis and additional therapy were similar between ESD and esophagectomy groups. But for T1b ESCC, the rates of positive resection margin and additional therapy were significantly higher in ESD group than those in esophagectomy group. ConclusionsESD is a minimally invasive procedure that has comparable oncologic outcomes with esophagectomy for treatment poorly differentiated T1a ESCC. However, ESD is not suitable for poorly differentiated T1b ESCC, additional surgery or radiochemotherapy should be required.

Outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for large protruded lesions: A retrospective multicenter study

Abstract Background and study aims Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for treating early-stage colorectal cancer, including large, protruded lesions (LPL). However, the challenges posed by LPLs, especially those accompanied by severe fibrosis or muscle-retracting sign (MRS), remain unclear. This study aims to investigate ESD outcomes for LPL, focusing on factors such as tumor size and, submucosal fibrosis. Patients and methods In a multicenter retrospective study (June 2012 to May 2023), data from 526 patients with 542 LPL lesions (≥ 2 cm) were analyzed. Parameters included lesion size, procedure time, dissection speed, physician experience, submucosal fibrosis, and adverse events. The tunnel method, including the double tunnel method, was used for cases with severe fibrosis or MRS. Multivariate analysis assessed factors affecting procedure difficulty, particularly LPLs ≥ 4 cm. Results The study revealed an impressive en bloc resection rate of 97.8% and a curative resection rate of 78.6% for LPLs. Notably, fibrosis and MRS were present in 25% and 18% of 4-cm LPLs, respectively, and their frequency tended to increase as the tumor diameter increased. One treatment strategy for LPLs was the tunneling method, which was used most frequently (41 cases, 7.6%). Factors affecting dissection speed included larger tumor size, submucosal fibrosis, MRS, and physician experience. Conclusions Treating LPLs through colorectal ESD presents significant challenges, especially in patients with fibrosis and MRS. This study highlights the importance of recognizing these complexities, and that more reliable resection strategy must be established for accurate pathological evaluation

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in cirrhotic patients: First American cohort.

Among patients with cirrhosis and pre-malignant or early malignant mucosal lesions, surgical intervention carries a much higher bleeding risk. When such lesions are discovered, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may offer curative therapy with lower risks than surgery and improved outcomes compared to traditional endoscopic resection. To evaluate the outcomes of ESD in patients with cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ESD between July 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively matched in 1:2 fashion to controls based on lesion location, size, and anticoagulation use. Procedural outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 64 Lesions from 59 patients were included (16 cirrhosis, 43 control). There were no differences in patient or lesion characteristics between groups. En bloc and curative resection was achieved in 84.21%, 78.94% of the cirrhosis group and 88.89%, 68.89% of controls, respectively, with no significant differences. Cirrhotic patients had significantly higher rates of intra-procedural coagulation grasper use for control of bleeding (47.37% vs 20%; P = 0.02). There were otherwise no significant differences in adverse event rates. In the 29 patients with follow up, we found higher rates of recurrence in the cirrhosis group compared to controls (40% vs 5.26%; P = 0.019), however this effect did not persist on multivariable analysis controlling for known confounders. ESD may be safe and effective in patients with cirrhosis. Most procedure related outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Intra-procedural bleeding requiring use of the coagulation grasper use was expectedly higher in the cirrhosis group given the known effects of liver disease on hemostasis.

Risk Factors for Post-Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Bleeding and Efficacy of Carbazochrome Sodium Sulfonate: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Carbazochrome sodium sulfonate (CSS) is a hemostatic agent that reduces capillary permeability and enhances capillary resistance. However, its specific effects on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and the effect of CSS on colorectal ESD outcomes. Methods: First, we retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding using data from 1,315 lesions in 1,223 patients who underwent ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms at eight institutions. Second, patients were divided into CSS and non-CSS groups using propensity score matching, and their outcomes from colorectal ESD were analyzed. Results: The risk factors for post-colorectal ESD bleeding were identified as age of ≥70 years, tumor located in the rectum, tumor size of ≥40 mm, and post-ESD defect unclosure in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The CSS and non-CSS groups each consisted of 423 lesions after propensity score matching. The post-colorectal ESD bleeding rate was 3.5% (15/423) and 3.3% (14/423) in the CSS and non-CSS groups, respectively, indicating no significant differences. Among patients with the high-risk factors for post-ESD bleeding, the administration of CSS also did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the post-ESD bleeding rate compared to the non-CSS group. Conclusion: CSS administration is ineffective in preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding in both the general population and individuals at a high risk for such bleeding. Our results indicate the necessity to reconsider the application of CSS for preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding.

Long- vs short-segment Barrett's esophagus-derived adenocarcinoma: clinical features and outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

The incidence of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA) is increasing, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been frequently performed for its treatment. However, the differences between the characteristics and ESD outcomes between short- and long-segment BEA (SSBEA and LSBEA, respectively) are unclear. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes of ESD between both groups. We retrospectively reviewed 155 superficial BEAs (106 SSBEAs and 49 LSBEAs) treated with ESD in 139 patients and examined their clinicopathological features and ESD outcomes. SSBEA and LSBEA were classified based on whether the maximum length of the background mucosa of BEA was < 3cm or ≥ 3cm, respectively. Compared with SSBEA, LSBEA showed significantly higher proportions of cases with the macroscopically flat type (36.7% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001), left wall location (38.8% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001), over half of the tumor circumference (20.4% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001), and synchronous lesions (17.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Compared with SSBEA, regarding ESD outcomes, LSBEA showed significantly longer resection duration (91.0min vs. 60.5min, p < 0.001); a lower proportion of submucosal invasion (14.3% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.047), horizontal margin negativity (79.6% vs. 94.3%, p = 0.0089), and R0 resection (69.4% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.024); and a higher proportion of post-procedural stenosis cases (10.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.027). The 5-year cumulative incidence of metachronous cancer in patients without additional treatment was significantly higher for LSBEA than for SSBEA (25.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). The clinicopathological features of LSBEA and SSBEA and their treatment outcomes differed in many aspects. As LSBEAs are difficult to diagnose and treat and show a high risk of metachronous cancer development, careful ESD and follow-up or eradication of the remaining BE may be required.

Management of giant colorectal polyps (≥3 cm) by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus surgery: a propensity score–based analysis

AbstractAimGiant colorectal polyps (≥3 cm) can be managed by endoscopic excision or surgical resection. There has been a shift to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of such lesions as the expertise in advanced therapeutic endoscopy develops. This study aims to compare the outcome and safety profile of ESD against surgical resection for patients with giant colorectal polyps.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review on patients with giant colorectal polyps removed by either ESD or surgery over a 10‐year period (from May 2010 to September 2020) in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. Propensity score matching was performed based on patient demographics and polyp characteristics. Outcomes including polyp histology, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and re‐admission rates were analysed.ResultsFifty‐one patients (ESD group: 34, surgery group: 17) were included in the analysis. The mean polyp diameter was 3.35 cm (ESD group) and 3.53 cm (surgery group). The median procedure time was comparable (160 vs 167 min; P = .251) and the most common polyp histological type was tubulovillous adenoma (44.1% vs 47.1%; P = .130) for both groups. A shorter median length of stay (1 day vs 6 days; P = .028) and lower re‐admission rate (0% vs 5.9%; P &lt; .001) were observed in the ESD group, whereas a higher major complication rate (Clavien–Dindo classification grade IIIa or above; 2.9% vs 11.7%; P = .013) was observed in the surgery group.ConclusionsESD is a safe and effective treatment for giant colonic polyps with ESD size ≥3 cm. It has the advantage of lower complication rates, shorter length of hospital stays, and lower re‐admission rates compared with surgical resection.