Outcomes Of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Research Articles

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in cirrhotic patients: First American cohort

BACKGROUND Among patients with cirrhosis and pre-malignant or early malignant mucosal lesions, surgical intervention carries a much higher bleeding risk. When such lesions are discovered, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may offer curative therapy with lower risks than surgery and improved outcomes compared to traditional endoscopic resection. AIM To evaluate the outcomes of ESD in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ESD between July 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively matched in 1:2 fashion to controls based on lesion location, size, and anticoagulation use. Procedural outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS A total of 64 Lesions from 59 patients were included (16 cirrhosis, 43 control). There were no differences in patient or lesion characteristics between groups. En bloc and curative resection was achieved in 84.21%, 78.94% of the cirrhosis group and 88.89%, 68.89% of controls, respectively, with no significant differences. Cirrhotic patients had significantly higher rates of intra-procedural coagulation grasper use for control of bleeding (47.37% vs 20%; P = 0.02). There were otherwise no significant differences in adverse event rates. In the 29 patients with follow up, we found higher rates of recurrence in the cirrhosis group compared to controls (40% vs 5.26%; P = 0.019), however this effect did not persist on multivariable analysis controlling for known confounders. CONCLUSION ESD may be safe and effective in patients with cirrhosis. Most procedure related outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Intra-procedural bleeding requiring use of the coagulation grasper use was expectedly higher in the cirrhosis group given the known effects of liver disease on hemostasis.

Long- vs short-segment Barrett's esophagus-derived adenocarcinoma: clinical features and outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

The incidence of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA) is increasing, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been frequently performed for its treatment. However, the differences between the characteristics and ESD outcomes between short- and long-segment BEA (SSBEA and LSBEA, respectively) are unclear. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes of ESD between both groups. We retrospectively reviewed 155 superficial BEAs (106 SSBEAs and 49 LSBEAs) treated with ESD in 139 patients and examined their clinicopathological features and ESD outcomes. SSBEA and LSBEA were classified based on whether the maximum length of the background mucosa of BEA was < 3cm or ≥ 3cm, respectively. Compared with SSBEA, LSBEA showed significantly higher proportions of cases with the macroscopically flat type (36.7% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001), left wall location (38.8% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001), over half of the tumor circumference (20.4% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001), and synchronous lesions (17.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Compared with SSBEA, regarding ESD outcomes, LSBEA showed significantly longer resection duration (91.0min vs. 60.5min, p < 0.001); a lower proportion of submucosal invasion (14.3% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.047), horizontal margin negativity (79.6% vs. 94.3%, p = 0.0089), and R0 resection (69.4% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.024); and a higher proportion of post-procedural stenosis cases (10.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.027). The 5-year cumulative incidence of metachronous cancer in patients without additional treatment was significantly higher for LSBEA than for SSBEA (25.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). The clinicopathological features of LSBEA and SSBEA and their treatment outcomes differed in many aspects. As LSBEAs are difficult to diagnose and treat and show a high risk of metachronous cancer development, careful ESD and follow-up or eradication of the remaining BE may be required.

Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding and efficacy of carbazochrome sodium sulfonate: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Carbazochrome sodium sulfonate (CSS) is a hemostatic agent that reduces capillary permeability and enhances capillary resistance. However, its specific effects on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and the effect of CSS on colorectal ESD outcomes. First, we retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding using data from 1,315 lesions in 1,223 patients who underwent ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms at eight institutions. Second, patients were divided into CSS and non-CSS groups using propensity score matching, and their outcomes from colorectal ESD were analyzed. The risk factors for post-colorectal ESD bleeding were identified as age of ≥70 years, tumor located in the rectum, tumor size of ≥40 mm, and post-ESD defect unclosure in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The CSS and non-CSS groups each consisted of 423 lesions after propensity score matching. The post-colorectal ESD bleeding rate was 3.5% (15/423) and 3.3% (14/423) in the CSS and non-CSS groups, respectively, indicating no significant differences. Among patients with the high-risk factors for post-ESD bleeding, the administration of CSS also did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the post-ESD bleeding rate compared to the non-CSS group. CSS administration is ineffective in preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding in both the general population and individuals at a high risk for such bleeding. Our results indicate the necessity to reconsider the application of CSS for preventing post-colorectal ESD bleeding.

Management of giant colorectal polyps (≥3 cm) by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus surgery: a propensity score–based analysis

AbstractAimGiant colorectal polyps (≥3 cm) can be managed by endoscopic excision or surgical resection. There has been a shift to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of such lesions as the expertise in advanced therapeutic endoscopy develops. This study aims to compare the outcome and safety profile of ESD against surgical resection for patients with giant colorectal polyps.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review on patients with giant colorectal polyps removed by either ESD or surgery over a 10‐year period (from May 2010 to September 2020) in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. Propensity score matching was performed based on patient demographics and polyp characteristics. Outcomes including polyp histology, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and re‐admission rates were analysed.ResultsFifty‐one patients (ESD group: 34, surgery group: 17) were included in the analysis. The mean polyp diameter was 3.35 cm (ESD group) and 3.53 cm (surgery group). The median procedure time was comparable (160 vs 167 min; P = .251) and the most common polyp histological type was tubulovillous adenoma (44.1% vs 47.1%; P = .130) for both groups. A shorter median length of stay (1 day vs 6 days; P = .028) and lower re‐admission rate (0% vs 5.9%; P &lt; .001) were observed in the ESD group, whereas a higher major complication rate (Clavien–Dindo classification grade IIIa or above; 2.9% vs 11.7%; P = .013) was observed in the surgery group.ConclusionsESD is a safe and effective treatment for giant colonic polyps with ESD size ≥3 cm. It has the advantage of lower complication rates, shorter length of hospital stays, and lower re‐admission rates compared with surgical resection.

Outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for large protruded lesions: A retrospective multicenter study

Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for treating early-stage colorectal cancer, including large, protruded lesions (LPL). However, the challenges posed by LPLs, especially those accompanied by severe fibrosis or muscle-retracting sign (MRS), remain unclear. This study aims to investigate ESD outcomes for LPL, focusing on factors such as tumor size and, submucosal fibrosis. Patients and methods: In a multicenter retrospective study (June 2012 to May 2023), data from 526 patients with 542 LPL lesions (≥ 2 cm) were analyzed. Parameters included lesion size, procedure time, dissection speed, physician experience, submucosal fibrosis, and adverse events. The tunnel method, including the double tunnel method, was used for cases with severe fibrosis or MRS. Multivariate analysis assessed factors affecting procedure difficulty, particularly LPLs ≥ 4 cm. Results: The study revealed an impressive en bloc resection rate of 97.8% and a curative resection rate of 78.6% for LPLs. Notably, fibrosis and MRS were present in 25% and 18% of 4-cm LPLs, respectively, and their frequency tended to increase as the tumor diameter increased. One treatment strategy for LPLs was the tunneling method, which was used most frequently (41 cases, 7.6%). Factors affecting dissection speed included larger tumor size, submucosal fibrosis, MRS, and physician experience. Conclusions: Treating LPLs through colorectal ESD presents significant challenges, especially in patients with fibrosis and MRS. This study highlights the importance of recognizing these complexities, and that more reliable resection strategy must be established for accurate pathological evaluation.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Criteria for Differentiated-type Early Gastric Cancer Are Applicable to Mixed-type Differentiated Predominant.

There is a lack of sufficient evidence on whether mixed-type differentiated predominant early gastric cancer (MD-EGC) can be treated endoscopically by referring to the criteria for differentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in MD-EGC. Patients with differentiated-type EGC treated with ESD first from January 2015 to June 2021 were reviewed, including MD-EGC and pure differentiated-type EGC (PD-EGC). Clinical data, including the clinicopathological characteristics, resection outcomes of ESD, and recurrence and survival time, were collected, and the difference between MD-EGC and PD-EGC was tested. A total of 48 patients (48 lesions) with MD-EGC and 850 patients (890 lesions) with PD-EGC were included. Compared with PD-EGC, MD-EGC had a higher submucosal invasion rate (37.5% vs. 13.7%, P<0.001) and lymphatic invasion rate (10.4% vs. 0.4%, P<0.001). The rates of complete resection (70.8% vs. 92.5%, P<0.001) and curative resection (54.2% vs. 87.4%, P<0.001) in MD-EGC were lower than those of PD-EGC. Multivariate analysis revealed that MD-EGC (OR 4.26, 95% CI, 2.22-8.17, P<0.001) was an independent risk factor for noncurative resection. However, when curative resection was achieved, there was no significant difference in the rates of recurrence (P=0.424) between the 2 groups, whether local or metachronous recurrence. Similarly, the rates of survival(P=0.168) were no significant difference. Despite the greater malignancy and lower endoscopic curative resection rate of MD-EGC, patients who met curative resection had a favorable long-term prognosis.

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer neoplasia in the West and change in the absolute indications.

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer neoplasia in the West and change in the absolute indications.

Outcomes of repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on endoscopic resection scar.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be performed for superficial esophageal cancer. However, performing ESD for superficial esophageal cancer on a previous endoscopic resection scar may be difficult. We compared the outcomes between ESD for superficial esophageal cancers on previous endoscopic resection scar (group A) and that for naïve lesions (group B). The study included outcomes of ESD, cumulative incidence of local failure, and predictors of the occurrence of local failure in ESD patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The outcome variables evaluated were en bloc resection rates, procedure times, adverse events, and overall survival rates. Overall, 220 lesions were extracted (groups A and B: 23 and 197 lesions, respectively). In groups A and B, the complete resection rates were 60.9 and 92.9% (P < 0.001), and the mean procedure times were 79 and 68min (P = 0.15), respectively. The perforation rates in groups A and B were 4.3 and 1% (P = 0.28). The 1-year cumulative local failure rates were 22 and 1% (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, superficial esophageal SCC on a previous endoscopic resection scar was a strong predictor of local failure (hazard ratio = 21.95 [3.99-120.80], P < 0.001). The 3-year overall survival rates in groups A and B were 95 and 93% (P = 0.99), respectively. Repeated ESD on scar is an option for treating superficial esophageal SCC with an acceptable rate of adverse events. Because of the low complete resection rate and high local failure compared with conventional ESD, strict endoscopic follow-up is required after repeated esophageal ESD.

Safety and efficacy of ESD for laterally spreading tumors with hemorrhoids close to the dentate line

Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a curative treatment for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). However, the outcomes of ESD for LSTs with hemorrhoids remain largely unknown. Our study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ESD in managing LSTs with hemorrhoids. Material and methods We retrospectively collected 418 consecutive LST patients treated with ESD between 2011 and 2023. A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted. Results There were 85 patients included in the hemorrhoids group and 333 patients included in the other group. The en-bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and curative resection rate were comparable in these two groups (p > 0.05). The LSTs with hemorrhoids have a significantly higher intraoperative bleeding rate during ESD when compared to the other group (12.9% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.028). Rates of intraoperative perforation and anal pain in the hemorrhoid group were significantly higher than those in the no-hemorrhoid group (2.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.041; 9.4% vs.0.6%, p < 0.001; respectively). Moreover, most of the related manifestations caused by hemorrhoids were relieved to various degrees after ESD. Conclusions ESD is a safe and effective treatment strategy for LSTs with hemorrhoids. A multi-center and prospective study should be conducted in the future to validate our results.

Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Endoscopic Mucosal Resection After Circumferential Precutting to Treat Gastric Adenomas ≤15 mm

Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely used approach for the resection of superficial gastric neoplastic lesions. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is acceptable for lesions &lt;10–15 mm in size. Herein, we compared the clinical outcomes of ESD with those of EMR after circumferential precutting (EMR-P) for gastric adenomas ≤15 mm.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients with 228 gastric adenomas ≤15 mm in size who were treated endoscopically at a single tertiary hospital in Korea between November 2018 and October 2022. We evaluated the complete endoscopic resection rate, recurrence rate, procedurer-elated complications, and procedure time according to the procedure used.Results: Among the 228 gastric adenomas, 49 were treated with EMR-P and 179 with ESD. The histological complete resection rate was higher in the ESD group than in the EMR-P group (87% vs. 57%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). No significant between-group differences were observed in endoscopic en bloc resection rates (ESD vs. EMR-P, 96% vs. 90%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;=0.081). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the EMR-P group than in the ESD group (28.9±19.7 min vs. 8.8±5.9 min, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). The local recurrence rate in patients with histologically incomplete resection did not differ between the two groups (ESD vs. EMR-P, 8.7% vs. 9.5%; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;=0.924).Conclusions: For gastric adenomas ≤15 mm, EMR-P may be the preferable treatment method considering the en bloc resection rate, procedure time, and local recurrence rate. However, considering the complete resection rate, ESD is recommended as the treatment of choice for high-grade adenomas and early gastric cancer lesions.

Comparison of prognostic outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgical treatment for early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background and aimThe optimal management strategy for early gastric cancer (EGC) a topic of contention. This study aims to compare the prognostic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical treatment in patients diagnosed with EGC.MethodsIn thisretrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from539 patients diagnosed with EGC between January 2012 and December 2020 from two centers. We compared Clinicopathological features, procedure-related complications, recurrence rate, overall survival, and disease specific survival between the 262 patients who underwent ESD and the 277 patients who underwent surgical treatment. ESD procedures were conducted using a dual knife by experienced endoscopists, while surgical treatments included laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. Regular ollow-up examinations were conducted post-treatment.ResultsThe two groups exhibited comparable baseline characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified vascular invasion as a risk factor for worse recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with early gastric cancer. The ESD group experienced fewer overall postoperative complications compared to the surgical treatment group. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated no significant differences in recurrence rate or overall survival between the two groups.ConclusionsBoth ESD and surgical treatment emerged as safe and effective approaches for managing EGC. The choice of treatment should be tailored to individual patient factors. ESD can be considered an alternative treatment option for selected patients who are not suitable candidates for surgery. Further studies are warranted to determine the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgical treatment for EGC.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term results from a Western cohort.

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is established as first-choice treatment for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) worldwide, most data are derived from Asian studies. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ESD for patients with early ESCC in a Western cohort. In this retrospective cohort study, patients with early ESCC amenable to ESD were included from four tertiary referral hospitals in the Netherlands between 2012 and 2017. All ESD procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists, after which the decision for additional treatment was made on a per-patient basis. Outcomes were curative resection rate, ESCC-specific survival, and overall survival. Of 68 included patients (mean age 69 years; 34 males), ESD was technically successful in 66 (97%; 95%CI 93%-100%), with curative resection achieved in 34/66 (52%; 95%CI 39%-64%). Among patients with noncurative resection, 15/32 (47%) underwent additional treatment, mainly esophagectomy (n = 10) or definitive chemoradiation therapy (n = 4). Endoscopic surveillance was preferred in 17/32 patients (53%), based on severe comorbidities or patient choice. Overall, 31/66 patients (47%) died during a median follow-up of 66 months; 8/31 (26%) were ESCC-related deaths. The 5-year overall and ESCC-specific survival probabilities were 62% (95%CI 52%-75%) and 86% (95%CI 77%-96%), respectively. In this Western cohort with long-term follow-up, the effectiveness and safety of ESD for early ESCC was confirmed, although the rate of noncurative resections was substantial. Irrespective of curative status, the long-term prognosis of these patients was limited mainly due to competing mortality.

Implementation of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Spain: Results from the nationwide registry

Introduction and aimsThe outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the esophagus have not been assessed in our country. Our primary aim was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of the technique. Material and methodsAnalysis of the prospectively maintained national registry of ESD. We included all superficial esophageal lesions removed by ESD in 17 hospitals (20 endoscopists) between January 2016 and December 2021. Subepithelial lesions were excluded. The primary outcome was curative resection. We conducted a survival analysis and used logistic regression analysis to assess predictors of non-curative resection. ResultsA total of 102 ESD were performed on 96 patients. The technical success rate was 100% and the percentage of en-bloc resection was 98%. The percentage of R0 and curative resection was 77.5% (n = 79; 95% CI: 68%–84%) and 63.7% (n = 65; 95% CI: 54%–72%), respectively. The most frequent histology was Barrett-related neoplasia (n = 55 [53.9%]). The main reason for non-curative resection was deep submucosal invasion (n = 25). The centers with a lower volume of ESD obtained worse results in terms of curative resection. The rate of perforation, delayed bleeding and post-procedural stenosis were 5%, 5% and 15.7%, respectively. No patient died or required surgery due to an adverse effect. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 20 patients (20.8%) underwent surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy, and 9 patients died (mortality 9.4%). ConclusionsIn Spain, esophageal ESD is curative in approximately two out of three patients, with an acceptable risk of adverse events.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection: Analysis of a multicenter prospective study.

We previously demonstrated that a favorable long-term prognosis indicated that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) could be the standard treatment for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms, but the usefulness of ESD for local residual or recurrent tumors with submucosal fibrosis has not been fully demonstrated. The aim of the present study was to assess the usefulness of ESD for local residual or recurrent colorectal tumors. We conducted a nationwide multicenter prospective study to evaluate the outcomes of ESD for colorectal tumors. In this post hoc analysis, a total of 54 local residual or recurrent colorectal tumors in 54 patients were included, and we analyzed the short-term and long-term outcomes of ESD for these lesions. The median size of the lesions was 16.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 11-25) mm. ESD was completed in 53 cases (98.1%) with a median procedure time of 65.0 min, but it was discontinued in one case because of submucosal cancer invasion. En bloc resection was achieved in 52 cases (96.3%), whereas R0 resection was achieved in 45 cases (83.3%). Intraoperative perforation was observed in four cases (7.4%) and delayed perforation in one (1.9%), but all cases could be managed conservatively. Delayed bleeding was not observed. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between the rectal and colonic lesions. There was no recurrence of the tumor during the median follow-up period of 60 (IQR50-64) months. An analysis of our multicenter prospective study suggests that ESD is an effective salvage management for local residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.

This retrospective study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in patients with superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. We investigated consecutive patients with SNADETs > 10mm in size who underwent ESD (ESD group) or LECS (LECS group) between January 2015 and March 2021. The data was used to analyze the clinical course, management, survival status, and recurrence between the two groups. A total of 113 patients (100 and 13 in the ESD and LECS groups, respectively) were investigated. The rates of en bloc resection and curative resection were 100% vs. 100% and 93.0% vs. 77.0% in the ESD and LECS groups, respectively, with no significant difference. The ESD group had shorter resection and suturing times than the LECS group, but there were no significant difference after propensity score matching. There were also no differences in the rates of postoperative adverse event (7.0% vs. 23.1%; P = 0.161). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was high in both the ESD and LECS groups (97.6% vs. 100%; P = 0.334). One patient in the ESD group experienced recurrence due to liver metastasis; however, no deaths related to SNADETs were observed. ESD and LECS are both acceptable treatments for SNADETs in terms of a high OS rate and a low long-term recurrence rate, thereby achieving a comparable high rate of curative resection. Further studies are necessary to compare the outcomes of ESD and LECS for SNADETs once both techniques are developed further.

Feasibility of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Elderly Patients: The Impact of Sarcopenia

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is a public health concern associated with high incidence rates. Sarcopenia is a known risk factor for postoperative complications, although an association between increased complications after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and sarcopenia remains undocumented. Herein, we aimed to explore the feasibility of colorectal ESD in patients with sarcopenia. Methods: This retrospective study included 499 patients (69 with and 430 without sarcopenia). We evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of colorectal ESD. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding en bloc, R0, or curative resection rates. However, poor bowel preparation was significantly more common in the sarcopenia group. Moreover, patients with sarcopenia exhibited a significant increase in complications (37.7% vs. 10.5%). Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR]: 3.78, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.85–7.73, p p p p = 0.02) were significantly correlated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ≥ grade 2. The correlation between sarcopenia and CTCAE ≥ grade 2 was maintained after matching, resulting in more extended hospital stays in patients with sarcopenia. However, we detected no association between sarcopenia and overall survival and ESD-related death. Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a risk factor for complications in colorectal ESD, suggesting that colorectal ESD could be performed for patients with sarcopenia, although much caution should be taken.

Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Older Patients Is Safe and Feasible: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study in the United States.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established method for treating early esophageal carcinomas. However, data on the safety and efficacy of esophageal ESD in older patients in the United States are limited. This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of esophageal ESD in patients aged ≥80 years and included those who underwent esophageal ESD between June 2018 and April 2023 at a single center in the United States. Patients were divided into two age groups for comparison: ≥80 and <80 years. Treatment outcomes and complications were evaluated and compared between these groups. A total of 53 cases of esophageal ESD for malignant neoplasms were included, with 12 patients in the ≥80 years age group. No significant differences were observed in the patients' background and characteristics, except for a prior history of interventions (p = 0.04). The en bloc resection rate was 100% in both groups. The R0 resection rate was lower in the ≥80 years age group (75% vs. 88%). There were no complications requiring additional intervention in the ≥80 years age group, such as post-ESD bleeding, perforation, mediastinal emphysema, or pneumonia. Esophageal ESD may be a safe and feasible procedure for treating esophageal carcinomas in older patients.

Safety of Duodenal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumor: A Single-Center Study in the United States.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is associated with a high rate of en bloc resection and low rate of recurrence. However, in the United States, SNADETs are predominantly managed using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or surgery because the feasibility and safety of duodenal ESD have not yet been established. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of duodenal ESD for SNADETs. This single-center retrospective study reviewed the data of patients who underwent ESD for SNADETs between June 2018 and August 2023. Baseline patient characteristics, histopathology of the resected lesions, adverse events, and recurrence rates were evaluated. The primary outcome measures were en bloc resection, complications, and recurrence rate. Thirty ESD procedures were performed on 24 patients. All 30 lesions were adenomas, with no cancerous lesions. The en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rates were both 53%. There were no cases of procedure-associated perforation. Post-ESD bleeding was observed in six cases. No ESD-related mortality was observed. The recurrence rate was 14% in 1 year follow up, and 28% the during all follow-up period. ESD is a safe option for SNADET in the United States; however further comparative studies are necessary to determine the optimal procedure for North American populations.

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in patients with severe comorbidities.

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal epithelial neoplasms (CENs) in patients with severe comorbidities have not been clarified; the current study aimed to examine these long-term outcomes and compared them with those in patients with non-severe comorbidities. We included 231 patients with CENs who underwent ESD between April 2005 and March 2023. Patients with comorbidities were categorized according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS). We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis and compared long-term outcomes of the two groups after ESD for CENs. Of the 156 patients enrolled in the study, 43 and 113 had severe (ASA-PS III) and non-severe (ASA-PS I/II) comorbidities, respectively. The 1:1 propensity score analysis matched 36 patients with severe comorbidities to 36 patients with non-severe comorbidities. After matching, there was no difference in the procedural outcomes of ESD between both groups. Regarding long-term outcomes, the 5-year overall survival rates after matching in the ASA-PS I/II and III groups were 100% and 73.5%, respectively, and patients in the ASA-PS III group exhibited significantly shorter overall survival than those in the ASA-PS I/II group (hazard ratio 7.209; 95% confidence interval 1.592-32.646; P = 0.010). No colorectal cancer-related deaths were noted in either group. Overall survival after ESD for CENs was shorter in patients with severe comorbidities than in those with non-severe comorbidities. Clinicians should carefully determine whether the benefits of CEN resection with ESD outweigh the procedural risks in patients with severe comorbidities.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: It is time to consider the quality of its outcomes

Endoscopic resection, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is widely used as a standard treatment modality for early gastric cancer (EGC) when the risk of lymph node metastasis is negligible. Compared with surgical gastrectomy, ESD is a minimally invasive procedure with additional advantages, such as preservation of the entire stomach and maintenance of the patient’s quality of life. However, not all patients achieve curative resection after ESD of EGC. Several patients require surgical gastrectomy after ESD to achieve a curative treatment. Additional surgery after ESD, owing to non-curative resection, places considerable emotional and financial burdens on patients. Recently, as the number of endoscopists performing ESD has increased, the rate of non-curative resection after ESD has increased correspondingly. In order to decrease the non-curative resection rate, as well as determine the ideal rate of non-curative resection after ESD, it is time to consider quality indicators for the outcomes of ESD for EGC.