Outcomes Of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Research Articles

Surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal approach as a modality of management for large and giant pituitary adenomas: a retrospective case series

BackgroundLarge and giant pituitary adenomas (defined as tumors of maximal diameter ≥ 3–3.9 cm and ≥ 4 cm, respectively) present considerable surgical challenges regarding the extent of resection and perioperative morbidity. Endoscopic endonasal resection is considered the most effective treatment for pituitary adenomas. It allows for better visualization, maneuverability, and access to distant and lateral tumor compartments, ultimately enhancing the extent of resection. This article evaluates our initial experience with endoscopic endonasal resection of large and giant pituitary adenomas. The clinical outcomes, perioperative complications, and extent of tumor resection would be specifically addressed.Patients and methodsThe primary goal of surgery was to decompress the optic pathways, and the secondary goals were to achieve maximal safe resection and hormonal control in hormone-secreting adenomas. The degree of tumor resection was classified as gross-total resection (100%), near-total resection (90–100%), subtotal resection (70–90%), and partial resection (< 70%).Results42 patients were included in this study. A good visual outcome achieved with 80% improvement in visual symptoms. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 19 patients (45.2%), near-total resection (NTR) was achieved in 12 patients (28.6%), subtotal resection (STR) in 6 patients (14.3%), and partial resection in the remaining 5 patients (11.9%). Subgroup analysis revealed that GTR, NTR rates were higher in large, compared to giant tumors. GTR, NTR rates of large adenomas were 59.3%, and 29.6%, compared to 20%, and 26.7% in giant adenomas respectively (p-value: 0.01428). Surgical complications were observed in 19 patients (45.2%) with CSF leakage being the most common complication (11 patients, 26.2%). Post-operative diabetes insipidus was observed in 5 patients (11.9%), major vascular injury in one case (2.4%), transient post-op 6th nerve palsy observed in 3 patients (7.1%), while two patients (4.8%) presented with post-operative paranasal sinuses infection.ConclusionsEndoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of large and giant pituitary adenomas is a safe and efficient procedure. Large adenomas (3–3.9 cm) have excellent resection rates and lower complications than giant adenomas (≥ 4 cm), which may require extending our approach to achieve more tumor resection rates in the future. However, only adequate resection of these giant adenomas can be enough to achieve the main surgical goals of visual improvement, hormonal control, and decompression of surrounding structures.

Clinical and Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Giant Pituitary Adenomas: Analysis of Predictive Factors

Giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) are defined as tumors with ≥40mm in any maximum diameter, and these tend to invade multiple intracranial compartments. Hence, treatment remains a surgical challenge. To describe the clinical and surgical outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for GPA in a pituitary referral center in Latin America and to analyze associated predictive factors. 37 patients with histologically-confirmed GPA treated solely through the EEA between a 2-year period were included. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and neuroimaging findings; surgical morbidity and mortality; and binary logistic regression analysis to assess predictive factors were analyzed. Preoperative visual impairment prevalence was 97.3%. Mean tumor volume was 32cc and gross total resection rate was 40.5%. Favorable visual acuity and visual fields outcome rate was 75% and 82.9%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, bilateral cavernous sinus invasion (P= 0.018) and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (P= 0.036) were associated with an unfavorable visual acuity outcome, while radiation therapy (P= 0.035) was for visual fields. Similarly, intraoperative CSF leak was a predictive factor for postoperative CSF leak (10.8%) (P= 0.042) and vascular injury (13.5%) (P= 0.048). In this first Mexican clinical series, we demonstrated that the EEA is a safe and effective technique for GPA, although early diagnosis and prompt intervention may promote further visual function preservation without significant endocrine morbidity.

Long-Term Outcome of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Rathke's Cleft Cysts

Long-Term Outcome of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Rathke's Cleft Cysts

Factors predicting outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach in craniopharyngioma patients.

Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is commonly used for resection of craniopharyngioma (CP). Treatment outcomes of EEA for CP were related to numerous factors; however, they have been evaluated in few studies. The objective of this study is to investigate factors associated with the outcomes of CP following this operation. The records of patients with CP, who underwent EEA at our institution from January 2014 to June 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, including the extent of resection, visual recovery, and endocrinological outcomes, were reported. Clinical and radiographic factors were analyzed for their associations with treatment outcomes using logistic regression analyzes. This study cohort consisted of 28 patients with CP. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 12 patients (43%). Post-operative visual status improved, stabilized, and deteriorated in 89%, 6%, and 6% of the patients, respectively. There were no patients recovered from pre-operative pituitary dysfunctions, while post-operative hypoadrenalism, hypothyroidism, and hypogonadism were found in 9 (36%), 11 (42%), and 4 (22%) patients, respectively. Post-operative permanent diabetic insipidus was found in 13 patients (50%). Greater suprasellar extension of the tumor was associated with a lower rate of GTR (P = 0.011). Diabetes mellitus (DM) was associated with poor visual recovery (P = 0.022). Larger tumor size and Puget grade 2 were associated with postoperative hypoadrenalism (P = 0.01 and 0.023, respectively). In addition, Puget grade 2 was associated with post-operative hypothyroidism (P = 0.017). For EEA in CP, the extent of resection could be determined by suprasellar extension of the tumor. DM was a poor predicting factor for visual recovery, while larger tumors and Puget grade 2 had a higher risk of post-operative hypopituitarism.

Anterior skull base reconstruction using nasoseptal flap: cadaveric feasibility study and clinical implication [SevEN-001

BackgroundPedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) has significantly improved the surgical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach (EEAs) by reducing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of using a PNSF for anterior skull base (ASB) reconstruction and to describe a method to compensate for a short flap based on our results.MethodsIn this cadaveric study, ASB dissection without sphenoidotomy was performed using 10 formalin-fixed and 5 fresh adult cadaver specimens, and the sufficiency of the PNSF to cover the ASB was assessed. After the sphenoidotomy, the length by which the PNSF fell short in providing coverage at the posterior wall of the frontal sinus (CPFS), and the extent of the anterior coverage from the limbus (CL) of the sphenoid bone was measured.ResultsWithout sphenoidotomy, the mean length of the remaining PNSF after the coverage of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus was 0.67 cm. After sphenoidotomy, the PNSF fell short by a mean length of 2.10 cm, in providing CPFS. The CL was 1.86 cm. Based on these findings, defects resulting from an endoscopic resection of ASB tumors were reconstructed using PNSF without total sphenoidotomy in 3 patients. There were no postoperative CSF leaks or complications.ConclusionsThe use of PNSF for ASB reconstruction may be insufficient to cover the entire ASB defect after removal of large lesions which need total sphenoidotomy. When possible, by leaving some portion of the anterior sphenoid wall for supporting the PNSF, successful ASB reconstruction could be achieved in endoscopic resection of ASB tumors. Additional methods might be needed in some cases of large ASB lesions wherein the anterior sphenoid wall should be removed totally and the ASB defect is too large.

Endoscopic transorbital and endonasal approach for trigeminal schwannomas: a retrospective multicenter analysis (KOSEN-005).

Trigeminal schwannomas are rare neoplasms with an incidence of less than 1% that require a comprehensive surgical strategy. These tumors can occur anywhere along the path of the trigeminal nerve, capable of extending intradurally into the middle and posterior fossae, and extracranially into the orbital, pterygopalatine, and infratemporal fossa. Recent advancements in endoscopic surgery have suggested a more minimally invasive and direct route for tumors in and around Meckel's cave, including the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and endoscopic transorbital superior eyelid approach (ETOA). The authors assess the feasibility and outcomes of EEA and ETOA for trigeminal schwannomas. A retrospective multicenter analysis was performed on 25 patients who underwent endoscopic surgical treatment for trigeminal schwannomas between September 2011 and February 2019. Thirteen patients (52%) underwent EEA and 12 (48%) had ETOA, one of whom underwent a combined approach with retrosigmoid craniotomy. The extent of resection, clinical outcome, and surgical morbidity were analyzed to evaluate the feasibility and selection of surgical approach between EEA and ETOA based on predominant location of trigeminal schwannomas. According to predominant tumor location, 9 patients (36%) had middle fossa tumors (Samii type A), 8 patients (32%) had dumbbell-shaped tumors located in the middle and posterior cranial fossae (Samii type C), and another 8 patients (32%) had extracranial tumors (Samii type D). Gross-total resection (GTR, n = 12) and near-total resection (NTR, n = 7) were achieved in 19 patients (76%). The GTR/NTR rates were 81.8% for ETOA and 69.2% for EEA. The GTR/NTR rates of ETOA and EEA according to the classifications were 100% and 50% for tumors confined to the middle cranial fossa, 75% and 33% for dumbbell-shaped tumors located in the middle and posterior cranial fossae, and 50% and 100% for extracranial tumors. There were no postoperative CSF leaks. The most common preoperative symptom was trigeminal sensory dysfunction, which improved in 15 of 21 patients (71.4%). Three patients experienced new postoperative complications such as vasospasm (n = 1), wound infection (n = 1), and medial gaze palsy (n = 1). ETOA provides adequate access and resectability for trigeminal schwannomas limited in the middle fossa or dumbbell-shaped tumors located in the middle and posterior fossae, as does EEA for extracranial tumors. Tumors predominantly involving the posterior fossa still remain a challenge in endoscopic surgery.

Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Craniopharyngiomas: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Objectives: Transcranial approaches were historically the first established routes for craniopharyngiomas resection. There is a limited body of literature on the outcome of endoscopic endonasal approach in resection of craniopharyngiomas. Therefore, the present study aims to assess the outcome of endoscopic endonasal approach in resection of craniopharyngiomas. Study Design: We retrospectively analyze and report our case series result and surgical outcomes and complications. Material and Methods: Total 11 patients underwent surgery at Loghman-Hakim and Day General Hospitals (Tehran, Iran). One patient had recurrent lesion. The gross-total resection (GTR) was attempted in nine surgeries. Results: GTR in nine cases and near-total resection in three cases were achieved. The average follow-up period was 30 months during which one recurrence in near resection cases was observed. Vision was improved by 80%. Seven cases developed diabetes insipidus that three was permanent and three cases developed panhypopituitarism postoperatively. Furthermore, postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks occurred in two patients, one of them needed reoperation for CSF leak management. In addition, postoperative bacterial meningitis occurred in two cases. Postoperative mortality was one due to bacterial meningitis and hyponatremia. Conclusion: Endoscopic, endonasal surgery for craniopharyngioma can be accompanied by high rates of GTR in selected case with acceptable results.