Outcome Of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Research Articles

Outcome of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Nasal and Lacrimal Sac Mucosal Flaps

Purpose: In patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction, the outcomes of surgery were evaluated according to the type or presence of flaps. Methods: In total, 509 eyes were compared retrospectively: 178 eyes in patients treated without flaps, 126 eyes in patients treated using nasal mucosa flaps, and 205 eyes in the patient group using nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap were compared retrospectively. We analyzed the factors of success according to the surgical method by comparing granulation and bony ostium obstruction at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery in each group. Results: At 6 months after surgery, granulation was found in 6 eyes (2.93%) in the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap group, 5 eyes (3.96%) in the nasal mucosal flap group, and 15 eyes (8.42%) in the group treated without flaps. Bony ostium obstruction was found in 3 eyes (1.46%) in the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap group, 4 eyes (2.38%) in the nasal mucosal flap group, and 6 eyes (2.81%) in the group treated without flaps. The anatomical surgical success rate of patients treated with nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flaps was 95.61%, which was higher than those of patients treated with nasal mucosal flaps (92.86%) and without flaps (88.20%). The functional and anatomical surgical success rate was 94.15% in the group treated with nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flaps, 88.89% in the group treated with nasal mucosal flaps, and 84.83% in the group treated without flaps. Conclusions: Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy using the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap is an effective method that minimizes the risk of granulation and bony ostium obstruction.

Ethmoid Sinus Mucosal and Lacrimal Sac Flap Anastomosing in Patients With Failed Dacryocystorhinostomy.

The aim of this work is to demonstrate the outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) with anterior ethmoid sinus mucosal and posterior lacrimal sac flap anastomosing in patients with previous failed DCR. The clinical data of patients who suffered from recurrent epiphora after failed DCR between September 2014 and March 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, those who received the second En-DCR procedure were enrolled in this study. During the surgery, anterior ethmoidectomy was performed. Posterior lacrimal sac flap was apposed closely to the mucosal of anterior ethmoid sinus instead of nasal flap at end of the surgery. Patients were followed up more than 12 months were included, the success rate and complications were recorded. Sixty-one eyes of 61 patients were enrolled in the study. The success rate of our modified En-DCR was 83.6% (51/61). Among 10 eyes with postoperative obstruction, 4 eyes caused by granuloma, 2 eyes caused by scar synechia, 2 eyes caused by membranous obstruction, and 2 eyes caused by common canalicular stenosis. No serious complications such as orbital fat prolapse, cerebrospinal fluid leak, sinusitis, or visual impairment were occurred in this study. Endoscopic approach with anterior ethmoid sinus mucosal and posterior lacrimal sac flap anastomosing is a good choice for patients with recurrent epiphora after previous failed DCR.

Surgical Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy According to the Level of Obstruction in Dacryocystography

Surgical Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy According to the Level of Obstruction in Dacryocystography

Prognostic Factors for Successful Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

Purpose: To evaluate the factors useful for predicting the surgical outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 117 eyes of 94 patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and were followed up for more than 6 months. Factors associated with successful surgery were analyzed based on the preoperative and intraoperative factors and postoperative clinical features. Preoperative factors such as age, gender, laterality, presence or absence of hypertension, and diabetes were analyzed. Intraoperative factors such as use of triamcinolone, removal of uncinate process or middle turbinate during surgery, and location of the sac were analyzed. The postoperative clinical features including high tear meniscus, no intranasal silicone tube movement, and no air reflux feeling were each given a score of 1. Based on aggregate score, the patients were divided into 2 groups, the high score and low score groups and analyzed accordingly. Results: The success rate was 91.5%. Patients with diabetes showed a significantly low success rate (73.3%, p = 0.007). In patients with high tear meniscus at 3, 6, and 9 weeks after surgery, the success rate was significantly low (76.9%, 81.8% and 75.0%; p = 0.003, p = 0.029 and p = 0.002, respectively). The low score group at 3 and 6 weeks after surgery showed a significantly high success rate (100% and 95.9%; p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). Conclusions: Besides preoperative and intraoperative factors, the early postoperative clinical features are important for predicting the success of the surgery. If tear meniscus is high and there is no intranasal silicone tube movement and air reflux from the punctum in the early stages after surgery, more active management from the initial treatment is needed. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2015;56(11):1661-1666

Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy without Mucosal Flap Preservation

Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy without Mucosal Flap Preservation

Outcomes of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Without Mucosal Flap Preservation

Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the standard procedure for the treatment of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) that can be performed through an external or endonasal approach. Both techniques create a fistula from the lacrimal sac into the nasal cavity via a bony osteotomy. Historically, external DCR has been considered the gold standard; however, recent reports suggest endonasal DCR is an effective alternative. There are numerous variations of endonasal DCR described in the literature that report variable success rates. The purpose of this study is to describe the approach and success rate with endonasal DCR in which nasal mucosa, bone, and lacrimal sac mucosa are sequentially removed. The authors retrospectively reviewed cases of endonasal DCR from 2004 to 2011 from 2 institutions (the University of California, San Diego, California, and the Fante Eye and Face Center in Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.). Patients with a history of epiphora and NLDO confirmed with punctal irrigation were included. Exclusion criteria were the presence of canalicular obstruction, history of orbital trauma, and prior DCR surgery. Success was defined as subjective relief of epiphora and confirmation of ostium patency with irrigation. A total of 324 patients (74 men, 250 women; mean age 59.3) encompassing 407 endonasal DCR cases were included in the study. The total case success rate was 92.2% with an average follow-up time of 91.5 days. Revision surgery was performed in 7 of the failed cases and resulted in success in 6 of these cases. Endonasal DCR is a simple and effective approach to surgically treat NLDO and offers success rates comparable with external DCR.

Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Patients with Sarcoidosis

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) surgery in patients with sarcoidosis.Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients with sarcoidosis undergoing EN-DCR in 6 practices from 1999–2011.Results: We included 18 procedures in 14 patients (8 female, 6 male) who underwent EN-DCR for acquired NLDO secondary to sarcoidosis. The mean age was 53.7 (range 38–82). The presenting symptom in all cases was epiphora. Eight patients (57%) complained of having additional nasal congestion. Surgery was performed using endoscopic powered-type DCR with flaps in 12/18 (67%) and non-endoscopic mechanical EN-DCR in 6/18 (33%). In 15 (83%) cases the lacrimal sac and nasal mucosa appeared abnormally yellowish, crusty, oedematous and friable. Five patients were treated with pre-operative oral steroid and overall 8 patients had oral prednisolone post operatively, 30–60 mg tapered within 10 days–8 weeks. One patient had difficulties in tapering down the oral steroids at 6 months of follow-up. All patients were free of epiphora and patent to syringing, with nasal endoscopy revealing free flow of fluorescein through the ostium at a mean follow-up of 11.3 months (median follow-up 9 months).Conclusions: All 18 cases of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction secondary to sarcoidosis were treated successfully with EN-DCR. An abnormal appearance of the nasal mucosa is an important sign. Nasal congestion is a frequent sign. A successful outcome may not depend on intensive long-term therapy with local or systemic steroids. Mechanical or powered EN-DCR for nasolacrimal duct obstruction secondary to sarcoidosis achieves encouraging medium-term outcomes.

Factors Associated With Outcome of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

To identify factors associated with outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. One hundred thirty-four cases of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in 111 patients performed for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction by a single surgeon between March 12, 2002 and November 10, 2008 were included in a retrospective, noncomparative case series. Variables assessed during the surgery included intranasal view, difficulty of bone removal, size of the lacrimal sac, presence of lacrimal sac stones, orbital fat prolapse and degree of bleeding. Successful outcome was defined as patency to lacrimal irrigation at final follow up. One hundred twenty-one of the 134 cases (90%) were patent to irrigation at final follow up (mean 8.8 ± 8.6 months). A small lacrimal sac opening intraoperatively was associated with higher risk of failure (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 5.7 [1.6, 20] [p = 0.0072]). Orbital fat prolapse had a trend toward higher risk of failure that approached statistical significance (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 5.3 [0.87, 32] [p = 0.0698]). A narrow intranasal view, difficult bony opening, lacrimal sac stones, and bleeding were not associated with outcome. A small lacrimal sac opening intraoperatively was associated with failure of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

The role of Accompanying Sinonasal Abnormalities in the Outcome of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction may occur simultaneously and possibly as a consequence of sinonasal disease, because the nasolacrimal system is anatomically related to important nasal and sinus structures. Thirty-seven patients with nasolacrimal canal obstruction (42 eyes) were evaluated with paranasal sinus computerized tomography (CT) to determine the presence of sinonasal abnormalities if any. All of the patients underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (end-DCR) and accompanying sinonasal pathology was treated also in the same session. Paranasal sinus CT examinations revealed one or more sinonasal abnormalities in 26 (73.3%) patients. The postoperative success rate of end-DCR procedure in patients with sinonasal abnormalities was 82.8%, whereas this figure increased to 92.3% in patients without additional sinonasal disease. However, additional rhinological surgery did not affect the success rate of end-DCR procedure significantly (p = 0.640). These data establish a positive correlation between sinonasal abnormalities and the presence of nasolacrimal outflow obstruction, but the additional rhinological surgery does not significantly affect the results of the end-DCR procedure.