Results Of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Research Articles

Permanent pacemaker at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term outcome: a nationwide study from the SWEDEHEART registry

Abstract Introduction A permanent pacemaker is not rare in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It is unknown if the presence of a pacemaker influences the long-term prognosis after surgery. Purpose To investigate if patients with permanent pacemaker have a higher risk for severe complications after CABG. Methods All patients who underwent CABG in Sweden 2006-2020 were included in a nationwide observational study based on prospectively collected data. Exclusion criteria were implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator at any time (prior to or after surgery) and death within 30 days. Individual patient data was merged from SWEDEHEART, The Swedish ICD- and pacemaker registry, the Cause of Death Register and the National Patient Register. Multivariable Cox regressions models were used to obtain hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The model was adjusted for age at operation, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, chronic respiratory disease, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Results In total 41,722 patients underwent CABG during the study period, 555 (1.3%) of these had a previously implanted permanent pacemaker. Patients with a previous pacemaker were older, more often male, and had more often reduced left ventricular ejection fraction heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension and peripheral artery disease. Permanent pacemaker was not associated with higher risk for all-cause mortality (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.09 (95%CI=0.96-1.26), p=0.30, Figure 1), myocardial infarction (aHR: 1.01 (95%CI=0.73-1.41), p=0.94), or cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.19 (95%CI=0.98-1.44), p=0.082). However, permanent pacemaker implantation was associated with increased risk for heart failure hospitalization (HR: 2.16 (95%CI=1.84-2.53), p<0.001). Conclusions A permanent pacemaker before CABG is not associated with increased mortality, cardiovascular mortality nor new myocardial infarction, but an increased risk for heart failure hospitalization after CABG. These patients could benefit from increased surveillance for heart failure symptoms after surgery to prevent hospitalizations.

Patients with metastatic cancer have worse short-term coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes: A population-based study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020

BackgroundMetastasis is a hallmark for cancer progression. While patients with metastatic cancer (MC) have higher risk profiles, outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in these patients have not been established, likely due to their smaller representation in the CABG patient population. This study aimed to examine the short-term outcomes of patients with MC who underwent CABG. MethodsPatients who underwent CABG were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015–2020. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, concomitant procedures, and non-metastatic malignancies. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to address differences in demographics, socioeconomic status, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and transfer/admission status between MC and non-MCC patients. In-hospital post-CABG outcomes were evaluated. ResultsThere were 379 (0.23 %) patients with MC who underwent CABG. All MC patients were matched to 1161 out of 164,351 non-MC patients who underwent CABG during the same period. Patients with MC had higher risks of mortality (4.76 % vs 2.58 %, p = 0.04), pacemaker implantation (2.91 % vs 1.12 %, p = 0.03), venous thromboembolism (1.85 % vs 0.43 %, p = 0.01), and hemorrhage/hematoma (61.11 % vs 55.04 %, p = 0.04). In addition, MC patients had a longer time from admission to operation (3.35 ± 4.19 vs 2.82 ± 3.54 days, p = 0.03) and longer hospital length of stay (11.86 ± 8.17 vs 10.65 ± 8.08 days, p = 0.01). ConclusionPatients with MC had higher short-term mortality and morbidities after CABG. These findings can help provide insights for clinicians in the management of patients with concurrent coronary artery disease and MC, particularly in terms of preoperative risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

Prediction of coronary artery bypass graft outcomes using a single surgical note: An artificial intelligence-based prediction model study.

Healthcare providers currently calculate risk of the composite outcome of morbidity or mortality associated with a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery through manual input of variables into a logistic regression-based risk calculator. This study indicates that automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques can instead calculate risk. Specifically, we present novel numerical embedding techniques that enable NLP (natural language processing) models to achieve higher performance than the risk calculator using a single preoperative surgical note. The most recent preoperative surgical consult notes of 1,738 patients who received an isolated CABG from July 1, 2014 to November 1, 2022 at a single institution were analyzed. The primary outcome was the Society of Thoracic Surgeons defined composite outcome of morbidity or mortality (MM). We tested three numerical-embedding techniques on the widely used TextCNN classification model: 1a) Basic embedding, treat numbers as word tokens; 1b) Basic embedding with a dataloader that Replaces out-of-context (ROOC) numbers with a tag, where context is defined as within a number of tokens of specified keywords; 2) ScaleNum, an embedding technique that scales in-context numbers via a learned sigmoid-linear-log function; and 3) AttnToNum, a ScaleNum-derivative that updates the ScaleNum embeddings via multi-headed attention applied to local context. Predictive performance was measured via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on holdout sets from 10 random-split experiments. For eXplainable-AI (X-AI), we calculate SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values at an ngram resolution (SHAP-N). While the analyses focus on TextCNN, we execute an analogous performance pipeline with a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to test if the numerical embedding advantage is robust to model architecture. A total of 567 (32.6%) patients had MM following CABG. The embedding performances are as follows with the TextCNN architecture: 1a) Basic, mean AUC 0.788 [95% CI (confidence interval): 0.768-0.809]; 1b) ROOC, 0.801 [CI: 0.788-0.815]; 2) ScaleNum, 0.808 [CI: 0.785-0.821]; and 3) AttnToNum, 0.821 [CI: 0.806-0.834]. The LSTM architecture produced a similar trend. Permutation tests indicate that AttnToNum outperforms the other embedding techniques, though not statistically significant verse ScaleNum (p-value of .07). SHAP-N analyses indicate that the model learns to associate low blood urine nitrate (BUN) and creatinine values with survival. A correlation analysis of the attention-updated numerical embeddings indicates that AttnToNum learns to incorporate both number magnitude and local context to derive semantic similarities. This research presents both quantitative and clinical novel contributions. Quantitatively, we contribute two new embedding techniques: AttnToNum and ScaleNum. Both can embed strictly positive and bounded numerical values, and both surpass basic embeddings in predictive performance. The results suggest AttnToNum outperforms ScaleNum. With regards to clinical research, we show that AI methods can predict outcomes after CABG using a single preoperative note at a performance that matches or surpasses the current risk calculator. These findings reveal the potential role of NLP in automated registry reporting and quality improvement.

Performance of left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery anastomosis by residents versus attendings and coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes.

Performance of a technically sound left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery (LITA-LAD) anastomosis during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is critically important. We used prospectively collected data from the multicentre, randomized REGROUP (Randomized Endograft Vein Perspective) trial to investigate CABG outcomes based on whether a resident or an attending surgeon performed the LITA-LAD anastomosis. This was a post hoc subanalysis of the REGROUP trial, which randomized veterans undergoing isolated on-pump CABG to endoscopic versus open vein harvest from 2014 through 2017. The primary end point was major cardiac adverse events, defined as the composite of all-cause deaths, nonfatal myocardial infarctions or repeat revascularizations. Among 1,084 patients, 344 (31.8%) LITA-LAD anastomoses were performed by residents and 740 (68.2%), by attending surgeons. Residents (compared to attendings) operated on fewer patients with high tercile SYNTAX scores (22.1% vs 37.4%, P < 0.001), performed fewer multiarterial CABGs (5.2% vs 14.6%, P < 0.001) and performed more anastomoses to distal targets with diameters > 2.0 mm (19.0% vs 10.9%, P < 0.001) and non-calcified landing zones (25.1% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001). During a median observation time of 4.7 years (interquartile range 3.84-5.45), major cardiac adverse events occurred in 77 patients (22.4%) in the group treated by residents and 169 patients (22.8%) in the group treated by attendings (unadjusted HR 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.33; P = 0.99). Outcomes persisted on adjusted analyses. Based on this REGROUP trial subanalysis, under careful supervision and with appropriate patient selection, LITA-LAD anastomoses performed by the residents yielded clinical outcomes similar to those of the attendings.

Autologous cell salvage in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduces post-operative complications: a retrospective weighted-matching analysis.

Blood transfusion plays a crucial role in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The choice between autologouscell saver (CS) and allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) has been a continuous debate in the medical community, especially within cardiac surgery. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) surgery in patients receiving blood solely via cell salvage compared to those receiving ABT or a combination of ABT and CS perioperatively. A total of 414 patients who underwent isolated OPCAB surgery at our cardiovascular clinic were analyzed. Among them, 250 patients (60.4%) received blood via CS alone, while 164 patients (39.6%) received either ABT or a mix of ABT and CS. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) matching technique ensured balance in baseline covariates. We found no significant differences in 30-day mortality rates between the CS and ABT groups. The CS group displayed significantly lower rates of overall complications, encompassing stroke, acute kidney injury, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary complications. Rates of sepsis, readmission, gastrointestinal complications, heparin-induced thrombosis, and deep venous thrombosis were comparable between the two groups. However, in contrast to the ABT group,the CS group exhibited significantly shorter median lengths of hospital stay (LOHS), ICU stay, andventilation time, along with higher rates of discharge to homerather than acute care facilities. Our data suggest that autologous blood transfusion via CS results in fewer perioperative complications and faster recovery following OPCAB procedures as compared to ABT.

Patients with alcohol abuse have higher risks of complications after coronary artery bypass grafting: a population-based study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2020

BackgroundAlcohol abuse (AA) has s high prevalence, affecting 10 to 15 million Americans. While AA was demonstrated to negatively impact cardiovascular health, limited evidence from existing studies presents conflicting findings regarding the effects of AA on coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes. This study aimed to compare the in-hospital outcomes after CABG between AA and non-AA patients. MethodsPatients who underwent CABG were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Exclusion criteria included age<18 years and concomitant procedures. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to address differences in demographics, socioeconomic status, primary payer status, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and transfer/admission status between AA and non-AA patients. In-hospital outcomes after CABG were examined. ResultsThere were 5,694 (3.39%) AA patients who underwent CABG. After matching, 17,315 from 162,488 non-AA patients were matched to all AA patients. AA and non-AA patients had comparable mortality (1.64% vs 1.55%, p=0.67) and MACE (2.46% vs 2.56%, p=0.73). However, AA patients had higher cardiogenic shock (8.31% vs 7.43%, p=0.03), mechanical ventilation (11.51% vs 7.96%, p<0.01), hemorrhage/hematoma (57.49% vs 54.75%, p<0.01), superficial (0.99% vs 0.61%, p<0.01) and deep wound complications (0.37% vs 0.18%, p=0.02), reopen surgery for bleeding control (0.92% vs 0.63%, p=0.03), transfer out (21.00% vs 16.38%, p<0.01), longer time from admission to operation (p<0.01), longer length of stay (p<0.01), and higher hospital charge (p<0.01). ConclusionWhile AA was not found to be linked with in-hospital mortality or MACE after CABG, it was independently associated with postoperative complications. These findings could enhance preoperative risk stratification for AA patients and inform postoperative management following CABG.

Factors Affecting Late Atrial Fibrillation and Its Association With Coronary Artery Bypass Outcomes

BackgroundAlthough predictors and outcomes of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) are well studied, evidence is lacking concerning postdischarge late/recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated factors affecting late/recurrent AF and its association with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes in a real-world setting. MethodsFrom 2012 through 2016, 5175 patients were included. Independent factors associated with late/recurrent AF were identified in a competing risk setting. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the association between late/recurrent AF and study outcomes, consisting of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular events, and heart failure admissions. ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 60 months (quartile 1-quartile 3, 59.3-60.7 months), late/recurrent AF developed in 85 patients (1.64%). Independent factors associated with late/recurrent AF were age (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), left-ventricular ejection fraction (sHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99), length of stay (sHR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04), and POAF (sHR, 4.02; 95% CI, 2.50-6.45). Late/recurrent AF was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events at unadjusted or adjusted levels (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.50-1.28] and 0.74 [95% CI, 0.48-1.13], respectively). Nevertheless, it significantly increased the unadjusted risk of cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 01.07-4.87), which disappeared after adjustments. ConclusionsPatients with advanced age, a lower left-ventricular ejection fraction, and POAF are more likely to have late/recurrent clinical AF. Albeit counterintuitive, late/recurrent AF was not independently associated with worse midterm post-CABG outcomes. These observations need to be further elucidated in larger-scale studies and interpreted in the context of a developing country with limited resources for late AF surveillance.

Zinc-aspirin preconditioning reduces endothelial damage of arterial grafts in a rodent model of revascularization.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most common cardiac surgical procedure. The prognosis of revascularization via CABG is determined by the patency of the used grafts, for which an intact endothelium is essential. The degree of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), which occurs during the harvest and implantation of the grafts, is an important determinant of graft patency. Preconditioning with aspirin, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug has been shown to reduce the functional and molecular damage of arterial grafts in a rodent model. Studies have found that the zinc-aspirin complex may be able to exert an even better protective effect in pathological cardiovascular conditions. Thus, our aim was to characterize the protective effect of zinc-aspirin complex on free arterial grafts in a rodent model of revascularization. Donor Lewis rats were treated with either zinc-aspirin, aspirin, or placebo (n = 8) for 5 days, then the aortic arches were harvested and stored in cold preservation solution and implanted heterotopically in the abdominal cavity of the recipient rats, followed by 2 h of reperfusion. There was also a non-ischemia-reperfusion control group (n = 8). Functional measurements using organ bath and histomorphological changes using immunohistochemistry were analyzed. The endothelium dependent maximal vasorelaxation was improved (non-transplanted control group: 82% ± 3%, transplanted control group: 14% ± 2%, aspirin group: 31% ± 4%, zinc-aspirin group: 52% ± 4%), the nitro-oxidative stress and cell apoptosis decreased, and significant endothelial protection was shown in the groups preconditioned with aspirin or zinc-aspirin. However, zinc-aspirin proved to be more effective in the reduction of IRI, than aspirin alone. Preconditioning with zinc-aspirin could be a promising way to protect the function and structural integrity of free arterial grafts, thus improving the outcomes of CABG.

Long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical coronary artery revascularisation.

Patients who are not candidates for traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and amenable only for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents can receive the "gold standard" left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) anastomosis through robotic-assisted CABG and PCI to non-LAD coronary targets. We aimed to analyse clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted CABG. A total of 2,280 consecutive patients who had undergone robotic-assisted CABG between May 2005 and June 2021 were included in our study. Robotic-assisted LITA harvest was followed by LITA-LAD manual anastomosis through a 4 cm left thoracotomy. Hybrid coronary intervention (HCR) consists of stent implantation in a non-LAD coronary artery performed within 7 days after robotic-assisted LITA-LAD. We performed a propensity-adjusted analysis comparison after dividing all robotic-assisted CABG patients into three time periods: 2005-2010, 615 patients; 2011-2016, 904 patients; and 2017-2021, 761 patients. The mean age increased from 64.5 years in the first time period to 65.8 years in the second time period to 68.1 years in the third (p<0.0001). Operative time was progressively reduced in the three periods (6.4; 6.2; 5.5 hours; p<0.001). The incidence of conversion to sternotomy remained similar for each period (1.8%; 1.7%; 1.5%; p=0.53). Thirty-day mortality in the three periods included 9 (1.4%), 9 (1.0%), and 7 (0.9%) patients, respectively (p=0.91), while 8 (0.3%) patients had PCI with stents in the entire group. The mean follow-up for the entire population was 4.2 years. At follow-up, the rates of all-cause death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, non-fatal stroke, and repeat revascularisation with stents were significantly decreased from the first to the last period (pË0.0001). Robotic-assisted CABG and HCR provides good long-term outcomes in patients who are not candidates for conventional CABG.

Comparative efficacy on outcomes of C-CABG, OPCAB, and ONBEAT in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the gold standard for the treatment of multivessel and left main coronary heart disease. However, the current evidence about the optimal surgical revascularization strategy is inconsistent and is not sufficient to allow for definite conclusions. Thus, this topic needs to be extensively discussed. The aim of this present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB), conventional on-pump CABG (C-CABG), and on-pump beating heart (ONBEAT) CABG via an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Registry were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials that were published in English before 1 December 2021. Published trials that included patients who received OPCAB, C-CABG, and ONBEAT CABG were selected. Two authors independently screened the search results, assessed the full texts to identify eligible studies and the risk of bias of the included studies, and extracted data. All processes followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality in patients who underwent C-CABG, OPCAB, or ONBEAT CABG. The secondary outcomes were postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, and renal impairment in the three groups. The time point for analysis of outcomes was all time periods during the postoperative follow-up. A total of 39385 patients (83496.2 person-years) in 65 studies who fulfilled the prespecified criteria were included. In the network meta-analysis, OPCAB was associated with an increase of 12% in the risk of all-cause mortality when compared with C-CABG [odds ratio (OR): 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04-1.21], a reduction of 49% in the risk of myocardial infarction when compared with ONBEAT (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-0.99), a reduction of 16% in the risk of stroke when compared with C-CABG (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99) and a similar risk of renal impairment when compared with C-CABG and ONBEAT. OPCAB was associated with higher all-cause mortality but lower postoperative stroke compared with C-CABG. OPCAB was associated with a lower postoperative myocardial infarction than that of ONBEAT. Early mortality was comparable among OPCAB, ONBEAT, and C-CABG.

The FRAGILE clinical trial: the impact of the coronary artery bypass graft in frailty

Abstract Background The exponential increase in the elderly population has been observed worldwide, and it implies a higher incidence of coronary artery disease and, consequently the need for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The growing number of elderlies is also related to frailty, a syndrome that affects at least 10% of the elderly population and is an exceedingly effective parameter for correlating with the adverse effects of aging. The impact of frailty concerning mortality and morbidity is well established however, there are no studies regarding the outcomes of CABG and its techniques in frail patients. Purpose To evaluate the impact of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patient's frailty and compare the differences in the frailty index after a 6-month follow-up between the groups off-pump and on-pump. Methods This was a subanalysis of the FRAGILE trial, a brazilian multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial that analyzed 169 patients aged 60 years or older undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with (on-pump) and without (off-pump) cardiopulmonary bypass. Using the Fried's Frailty Criteria, we classifed the patients into frail, pre-frail, and non-frail and also evaluated the five paramenters of this criteria. The patients were divided into two groups: the off-pump CABG group (n=87) and the on-pump CABG group (n=82), and compared unintentional weight loss, self-reported fatigue, physical activity level, grip strength, and gait speed before and after surgery, and between groups. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and all patients signed the informed consent. Results We observed an improvement in the frailty of patients undergoing CABG. Overall, over 50% of frail patients became pre-frail after CABG, and only 3% of the total patients were classified as frail after 6 months of surgery (Fig 1A). No patient was classified as non-frail preoperatively in both groups because it was one of the exclusion criteria. There is no difference between the groups off-pump and on-pump (Fig 1B). The total time of physical activity, the gait speed, and the self-reported fatigue were positively impacted regardless of surgical technique. However, grip strength and unintentional weight loss were improved only in the group that underwent off-pump CABG surgery. Patients reported practicing an average more time of exercises, improved gait speed, and claimed to be less fatigated compared to the before-surgery measurements. However, grip strength and unintentional weight loss were improved only in the group that underwent off-pump CABG surgery (Table 1). Conclusion CABG positively impacts patients' frailty after six months of surgery. Both techniques, on-pump and off-pump, showed positive results when comparing frailty features before and after CABG surgery. Nevertheless, the off-pump CABG was the only technique that played a role in improving grip strength and unintentional weight loss of patients after 6 months of surgery.Frailty classificationFrailty's parameters

Abstract 12145: Intraoperative Anemia Mediates Sex Disparity in Operative Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Introduction: Women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have higher mortality compared with men, yet its drivers are unclear. Hypothesis: The association of female sex with the risk of operative mortality after CABG may be mediated by intraoperative anemia. Aim: To investigate the relationship between sex, intraoperative anemia, and operative mortality. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 1,434,225 isolated primary CABG patients (344,357 women) from the Adult Cardiac Surgery Database of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (2011-2022). The primary outcome was operative mortality. The attributable risk (AR, quantifying the risk-adjusted strength of the association of female sex with CABG outcomes) was calculated. Causal mediation analysis adjusted for 42 baseline risk factors was used to derive the total effect of female sex on mortality risk and the proportion of that effect mediated by intraoperative anemia (nadir hematocrit). Spline regression evaluated the relationship of operative mortality and nadir intraoperative hematocrit. Results: Women had lower median preoperative hematocrit (36.9%, interquartile range [IQR] 33.3-40.0 vs 41.0% [37.4-44.0], standardized mean difference [SMD] 74.0%) and nadir intraoperative hematocrit (22.0% [20.0-25.0] vs 27.0% [24.0-30.0], SMD 97.0%) compared with men. Women had higher operative mortality than men (2.8% vs 1.7%, p&lt;0.001, adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.41). The AR of female sex for operative mortality was 1.21 (95% CI 1.17-1.24). After adjusting for nadir intraoperative hematocrit, the AR was reduced by 43% (1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16). Intraoperative anemia mediated 38.5% of the increased mortality risk associated with female sex (95% CI 32.3-44.7%). Spline regression showed a stronger association between operative mortality and nadir intraoperative hematocrit at hematocrit values below 22.0% (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: The association of female sex with increased CABG operative mortality is mediated to a large extent by intraoperative anemia. Avoiding nadir intraoperative hematocrit values below 22.0% may reduce sex differences in CABG operative mortality.

Abstract 17509: Gender-Specific Differences in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background: Several studies suggested that females undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have poorer outcomes than males. However, we noted contradicting findings regarding short and long-term mortalities among females. Our aim is to assess gender-specific differences in pre and post -operative CABG risk factors and outcomes. Methods: Our cohort included 7,687 adult patients who underwent CABG surgery between 2006 and 2022 in a large rural healthcare system. Patients were grouped by gender and continuous variables were summarized using median and inter-quartile range. Appropriate statistical tests were conducted to assess differences. Results: There were 1827 (23.8%) females and 5860 (76.2%) males. Females were slightly older ((68, 60.5, 75) vs (67, 65, 73), p&lt;0.0001), with higher total number of Elixhauser comorbidities ((6, 3, 8) vs (4, 3, 7), p&lt;0.0001), higher cha2ds2vasc scores ((4, 3, 5) vs (3, 2, 4), p&lt;0.0001) and higher prevalence of stroke history (12.4% vs 10.3%, p=0.013). Analysis of risk factors used for computing the Society of Thoracic (STS) scores revealed several significant differences (with p&lt;0.001) between females and males including sleep apnea (12.1% vs 15.7%), diabetes (52.7% vs 43.4%), depression (25.5% vs 13.9%), and BMI ((31.6, 14.4, 35.5) vs (28.8, 25.8, 33.7)). Compared to males, females had greater need for blood transfusions (49.8% vs 33.6%), prolonged post-operative pulmonary ventilation (33.8% vs 24.4%), mediastinal drainage (13.4% vs 6.4%) and more frequent acute cardiac arrests (7.2% vs 4.8%). In addition females had higher 30-day mortality (0.93% vs 0.84%, p=0.014), 1-year mortality (4.2% vs 2.9%, p=0.0003), 1-year incident stroke (2.2% vs 1.5%, p=0.05), longer hospital length of stay (LoS) in hours ((143.4, 116.9, 191.6) vs (120.7, 96.9, 167.2), p&lt;0.0001), ICU LOS in hours ((96, 48.8, 143.9) vs (77.9, 39.4, 120), p&lt;0.0001), and duration from discharge to all-time mortality in days ((1513, 523.5, 2723.5) vs (1740, 622, 2921), p=0.008). Conclusions: Female gender is linked to several pre-operative and post-operative risk factors and are at greater risk of adverse outcomes following CABG surgery. Further work is needed to understand the causes of these discrepancies and to limit their effect on outcomes.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of coronary arteries constitutes a substantial clinical challenge and has historically been managed through medical management and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, with the advancement in interventional technology, the success rate of percutaneous treatment has been significantly improved, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as a primary mode of treatment for CTOs, demonstrating remarkable clinical efficacy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate and contrast the outcomes of PCI and CABG in patients with CTO. Methods and Results. A systematic search was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The primary endpoints evaluated in this meta-analysis were the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and the need for repeat revascularization. Nine studies, encompassing a total of 8,674 patients, were found to meet the criteria for inclusion and had a mean follow-up duration of 4.3 years. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that compared to CABG, PCI was associated with a lower incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66–0.92; P = 0.003) and cardiac death (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.31–0.96; P &lt; 0.05), but an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) (RR: 1.96; 95%CI: 1.07–3.62; P &lt; 0.05) and repeat revascularization (RR: 7.13; 95% CI: 5.69–8.94; P &lt; 0.00001). There was no statistically significant difference in MACE (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.69–1.81; P = 0.66) between the PCI and CABG groups. Conclusion. In the present meta-analysis comparing PCI and CABG in patients with chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries, the results indicated that PCI was superior to CABG in reducing all-cause mortality and cardiac death but inferior in decreasing myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. There was no statistically significant difference in MACE between the two groups.

Comparative Analysis of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Outcomes in Women Using Different Conduits in the National UK Data Set

BackgroundThere is limited report of outcomes in women undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with left internal thoracic artery and different second conduits (saphenous vein graft [SVG], radial artery [RA], and right internal thoracic artery [RITA]). MethodsThe National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit database was queried for women undergoing isolated CABG with left internal thoracic artery graft in the United Kingdom from 1996 to 2019. Propensity score–based pairwise comparisons were performed between graft types. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. ResultsThe study included 58,063 women (SVG, n = 48,881 [84.2%]; RA, n = 6136 [10.6%]; RITA, n = 2445 [4.2%]). SVG use was stable over the years; RA and RITA use decreased. In-hospital mortality was similar between the RA and RITA grafts (2.3% vs 2.8%; odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.22; P = .39) and between the RA and SVG (2.3% vs 2.0%; OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.93-1.55; P = .17) but higher in the RITA group compared with the SVG (2.7% vs 1.4%; OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.27-3.36; P = .004). Women receiving the RITA graft were more likely to have sternal wound infection (SWI) compared with the RA (0.6% vs 0.06%; P = .004) and the SVG (0.6% vs 0.2%; P = .032). SWI was consistently associated with higher risk of in-hospital mortality. ConclusionsConduit selection may affect operative outcomes in women undergoing CABG. The RA shows similar mortality and risk of deep SWI as the SVG.

Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has been in practice for many decades, and it is one of the most commonly performed cardiac surgeries worldwide. While there are several studies reporting data on perioperative outcomes following CABG in developed countries, there is a staggering paucity of data and evidence reporting the outcomes in developing areas such as Africa. Thus, it is important to study the practice and outcome of CABG in Africa to establish its clinical efficacy and safety in this region and identify factors that might be limiting its practice. The overall aim of this study is to identify all relevant clinical data on CABG in Africa and report on the perioperative outcomes and practice of CABG in the African population. Electronic searchwas performed using three online databases, PubMed, African Journal Online, and Research Gate, from inception to June 2023. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline was utilised for this study.Relevant studies fulfilling predefined eligibility criteria were included in the study. Intraoperative details, such as the number of grafts performed, operative, bypass, and cross-clamp time, were reported. The primary endpoint assessed were earlymortality and overall mortality. The secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay,intensive care unit stay, and postoperative complications, such as renal impairment, atrial fibrillation, and surgical site infection. The data were pooled together and meta-analyzed using a random effect model for proportions and mean for meta-analysis with R software (version 4.3.1 (2023-06-16); R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria). This systematic review identified 42 studies that fulfilled the study eligibility criteria, including 21 randomised controlled trials, 20 observational studies, and one cross-sectional study. Only four out of the 54 countries in Africa had studies carried out that met the criteria for this review; they included Algeria, Egypt, Nigeria, and South Africa, with a majority from Egypt. Meta-analysis reported a pooled early mortality andpooled overall mortality of 3.51% and 3.73%, respectively, for the total cohort of patients. The result of this meta-analysis suggests that mortality outcomes following CABG in Africa are relatively higher than those in developed nations. Several issues, such as lack of financial resources and poor infrastructure, continue to hinder the optimal practice of CABG procedures in many parts of Africa. Further studies focused on finding factors associated with outcomes following CABG should be done. Though there were a few limitations to the study largely from a lack of data from several regions and countries in Africa, the result from this meta-analysis can serve as a benchmark for future studies until more relevant data are reported.

Safety-Net Hospital Status Is Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Outcomes at an Urban Academic Medical Center

IntroductionSocioeconomic disparities impact outcomes after cardiac surgery. At our institution, cardiac surgery cases from the safety-net, county funded hospital (CH), which primarily provides care for underserved patients, are performed at the affiliated university hospital. We aimed to investigate the association of socioeconomic factors and CH referral status with outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). MethodsThe institutional Adult Cardiac Surgery database was queried for perioperative and demographic data from patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 2014 and June 2020. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), a composite of postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. Secondary outcomes included individual complications. Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and logistic regression analyses were used to compare differences between CH and non-CH cohorts. ResultsWe included 836 patients with 472 (56.5%) from CH. Compared to the non-CH cohort, CH patients were younger, more likely to be Hispanic, non-English speaking, and be completely uninsured or require state-specific financial assistance. CH patients were more likely to have a history of tobacco and drug use, liver disease, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, and greater degrees of left main coronary and left anterior descending artery stenosis. CH cases were less likely to be elective. The incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the CH cohort (16.3% versus 8.2%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in 30-d mortality, home discharge, prolonged mechanical ventilation, bleeding, sepsis, pneumonia, new dialysis requirement, cardiac arrest, or multiorgan system failure between cohorts. CH patients were more likely to develop renal failure and less likely to develop atrial fibrillation. On multivariable analysis, CH status (odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval 1.25-4.55, P = 0.008) was independently associated with MACE. ConclusionsCH patients undergoing CABG presented with greater comorbidity burden, more frequently required nonelective surgery, and are at significantly higher risk of postoperative MACE.

Effect of elevated HbA1c on outcomes in on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

BackgroundDiabetic patients are at an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidities. We aimed to examine if elevated pre-operative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are associated with higher likelihood of experiencing adverse events in on-pump (ONCAB) versus off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures. We examined characteristics of patients undergoing CABG using our institutional STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) from 2014 to 2020. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were used to compare postoperative outcomes between ONCAB and OPCAB based on preoperative HbA1c levels: (1) HbA1c ≤ 6.0%, (2) 6.0% < HbA1c ≤ 7.0%, (3) 7.0% < HbA1c ≤ 8.5%, (4) HbA1c > 8.5%. Multivariable models were built to assess risk factors associated with adverse events. Primary outcomes were operative mortality and stroke.ResultsFor ONCAB, statistically significant associations were found between increasing HbA1c and new post-operative dialysis (p=0.01), rates of readmission (p=0.003) and greater lengths of stay (p=0.002). For OPCAB, statistically significant associations were found between increasing HbA1c and rates of operative mortality (p=0.04), post-operative renal failure (p=0.0001), new post-operative dialysis (p=0.0001), sternal wound infection (p=0.01), and greater lengths of stay (p=0.03). No significant relationship was noted between HbA1c and stroke, reoperation due to bleeding, or post-operative transfusion.ConclusionsIncreasing HbA1c positively correlated with numerous adverse patient outcomes in both ONCAB and OPCAB, and differences were noted in which outcomes were most impacted between the two techniques. Pre-operative medical optimization from a diabetes standpoint is paramount to improve CABG outcomes in both on-pump or off-pump techniques.

Discussion to: Nonelective coronary artery bypass graft outcomes are adversely impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, but not altered processes of care: A National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) analysis

Discussion to: Nonelective coronary artery bypass graft outcomes are adversely impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, but not altered processes of care: A National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) analysis

Practice makes perfect? Institutional coronary artery bypass case volumes and outcomes.

Older studies of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) institutional case volumes and outcomes reported conflicting results. We explored this association in the rapidly changing contemporary practice of American surgeons using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. The 2018-2019 isolated primary CABG experience in the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was analysed (241902 patients; 1014 hospitals; 2718 surgeons). Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate coefficients between CABG institutional case volumes and outcomes. The observed-to-expected ratios based on STS risk models were used to assess risk-adjusted operative mortality (OM), mortality/major morbidity (MM) and deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) as a function of institutional case volumes. The mean (standard deviation) OM, MM and DSWI rates were 2.1% (2.7), 11.1% (9.2) and 0.6% (0.5), respectively. The mean (standard deviation) institutional case volumes per study period was 239 (192); 23% and 9% of institutions performed <100 and >500 cases/study period, respectively. There was a weak negative correlation between expected mortality (R2 -0.0014), OM (R2 -0.0272), MM (R2 -0.1213) and DSWI (R2 -0.003) and institutional case volumes. CABG outcomes generally improve with increasing institutional case volumes. Given the large number of CABG cases performed nationally, even the documented weak correlation has the potential to appreciably decrease OM, MM and DSWI if cases are performed at higher volume institutions. Studies focusing on additional hospital and surgeon factors are warranted to further define quality improvement opportunities.