Outcomes Of Acute Coronary Syndrome Research Articles

Cardiovascular medications, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentrations, and long-term outcome in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Cardiac troponin plays an essential role in the management of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, it is not clear whether troponin concentrations provide guidance regarding the initiation of prognostically beneficial cardiovascular medications [i.e. betablockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, and statins] in NSTE-ACS. Registry-based study investigating three NSTE-ACS cohorts (n = 43 075, 40 162, and 46 698) with elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations >14 ng/L. Cox proportional regression models with the addition of interaction terms were used to analyse the interrelations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentrations, new initiated medications with the respective three drug classes, and long-term risk of all-cause mortality and major adverse events (MAE). Betablockers were associated with risk reductions of 8 and 5% regarding all-cause mortality and MAE, respectively. There was no evidence of an interaction with hs-cTnT concentrations. RAAS inhibitors were associated with 13 and 8% risk reductions, respectively, with a weak interaction between hs-cTnT and MAE (Pinteraction = 0.016). However, no increasing prognostic benefit was noted at hs-cTnT concentrations >100 ng/L. Statins were associated with 38 and 32% risk reductions, respectively, with prognostic benefit across the entire range of hs-cTnT concentrations, and with a weak interaction regarding MAE (Pinteraction = 0.011). Cardiovascular medications provide different prognostic benefit in patients with NSTE-ACS with elevated hs-cTnT, and there was some evidence of greater treatment effects regarding MAE along with higher hs-cTnT concentrations. However, hs-cTnT appears only to have limited value overall for customizing such treatments.

The Impact of Sickle Cell Disease on Acute Coronary Syndrome and PCI Outcomes: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder that is widely observed on a global scale and known for its substantial negative impact on health and mortality. The purpose of this research was to explore how SCD influences the outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was conducted using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data for the year 2020. Adult patients with concurrent ACS and SCD diagnoses were included in the study. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and PCI complications were examined and compared between ACS patients with and without SCD. Results: Among a total of 779,895 ACS patients, 1495 had coexisting SCD. SCD patiets exhibited distinct demographic features, such as younger age (mean age: 59 vs. 66 years), predominantly female (53% vs. 35%), and primarily African American (91% vs. 11%). Comorbid conditions such as hypertension and chronic lung disease were more prevalent in SCD patients. While inpatient mortality odds did not significantly differ, SCD patients demonstrated slightly shorter lengths of stay in cases of STEMI and NSTEMI/UA. Notably, SCD patients faced a statistically significant increased risk of coronary dissection, highlighting a unique complication in this population. Although an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation and acute heart failure was observed in SCD patients, statistical significance was not achieved. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insight into the intricate interplay between SCD and ACS outcomes. SCD patients presented with distinctive demographic and clinical profiles that influenced their experience with ACS. The elevated risk of coronary dissection emphasizes the necessity for tailored interventions and careful management in SCD patients. These findings underscore the need for further research to elucidate underlying mechanisms and optimize treatment strategies for individuals with both SCD and ACS.

Gender, racial and ethnic disparities in acute coronary syndromes with coronary in-stent restenosis

BackgroundCoronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) is a major clinical challenge of contemporary percutaneous revascularization and portends adverse cardiovascular outcomes. ObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate gender, race, and ethnicity related outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with ISR. MethodsPrimary hospitalizations for ACS and ISR in the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019 were included. Patients were stratified by gender, race, and ethnicity. The primary end points were all cause in-hospital mortality and coronary revascularization defined as composite of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), balloon angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). ResultsDuring the study period, a nationally weighted total of 97,680 patients with ACS and ISR were included. There was substantial variation in comorbidities, with greatest burden among Black and Hispanic women. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 2.4 % in the study cohort, but significantly higher in women (2.1 % vs. 2.1 %; aOR: 1.282, 95 % CI: 1.174–1.4; p < 0.001) and revascularization rates were significantly lower in women (77 % vs 80.2 %; aOR: 0.891, 95 % CI: 0.862–0.921; p < 0.001). Compared to White men, all women except Hispanic women, had significantly higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality, while White women, Black men and women, and Hispanic men had lower odds of revascularization. ConclusionsThere are significant gender, racial, and ethnic related differences in revascularization practices and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS and ISR with an adverse impact on women, racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S.

Left ventricular systolic function in patients with acute coronary syndrome-risk profile

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introductions and objectives Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is one of the most important determinants of long-term outcome in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Aim To determine the impact of the patient’s risk profile on the LV systolic function. Methods A single-center cross-sectional cohort study that included 3093 patients with ACS without pre-existing LV dysfunction. The comparison was performed between patients who did or did not develop a reduction in LV systolic function during the index event (&amp;lt;50%/≥50%), analyzing patients’ demographic, clinical, biochemical data, LV functional data, and anatomical distribution of the coronary artery disease (CAD). Result 1369 patients out of 3093 developed LV systolic dysfunction (44.3%). They were predominantly males 75.1% (1028), p=0.002; older (63.39±11.04 vs 61.21±11.12, p&amp;lt;0.00000); had higher level of cardiac troponin (p=0.00002), higher stress glycemia (9.2±5.3; p=0.0000001), HbA1c (6.9±1.8, p=0.000003), WBC (11.7±4.1, p=0.00001), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (6.8±3.7, p=0.000003), and creatinine (93.2±45.1 p=0.000167), and had anemia (OR 0.35 (CI 0.29–41, p=0.000012). They had more severe CAD (SINTAX score 16.8±8.4 p=0.000012). Patients with preserved LV systolic function were predominantly females (29.7%, OR 1.1 95% CI 1.0-1.2), p = 0.002), younger (p&amp;lt;0.00000), and severely metabolically burdened (hypothyreosis (2.7%, OR 1.28 95% CI 0.93-1.76, p=0.052), higher levels of triglycerides (2.2±1.7 vs 1.9±1.5, p = 0.001), cholesterol (5.3±1.4 vs 5.2±1.4, p = 0.002), non-HDL-C (4.1±1.5 vs 3.9±1.3, p=0.006), however less likely to have pre-existing DM (OR 0.8 (CI 0.78–0.92), p=0.000094). They were more often NSTEMI [851 (49.4%), p = 0.000012]. Independent variables associated with a reduction in LV function were: advanced age, male gender, previous DM and anemia, stress glycemia, WBC, creatinine, and BUN. Conclusion Patients who developed reduced LV function had a very specific risk profile with bigger neuro-hormonal activation and inflammation, higher degree of myocardial damage, and worse renal function, whereas those with preserved LV systolic function after ACS were younger, predominantly females, more severely metabolically burdened, more often with NSTEMI and without LAD involvement.

What if youth is not enough? Acute coronary syndrome in young patients

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) are the leading cause of mortality in Spain. Further research is needed in order to know risk factors and outcomes in young patients so that medicians could optimize their management and prevention. Purpose Identifying risk factors, clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome in patients aged 40 and under. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients under 40 years of age who were admitted for ACS, out of 3,859 ACS admissions in Cardiology Intensive Care Unit (CICU) in our hospital between 2012 and 2022. Results 67 patients (1.73%) were included, most of them were males (83.6%). Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. 77.6% had hypertension (HTA), 22.4% had diabetes (DM) and 34.3% had dyslipidemia (DLP). 79.1% were smokers, 9.1% had a history of alcoholism and 29.9% were cocaine users. None of them had a history of stroke, atrial fibrillation (AF). Only 3% had ischemic heart disease. 68.7% of them were ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and inferior STEMI was the most common (38.7%). In anterior STEMI (22 patients), 15 had a severe lesion in the mid-left anterior descending artery (LAD), and 6 in the left main stem (LM). Single-vessel disease was the most common (70.8%), with 3-vessel disease in 4.6%. 75.8% received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 3% underwent bypass surgery. During admission, 10.5% progressed to Killip class III-IV. The ICU mortality was 1.5%. 9% received vasoactive drugs and 4.5% were intubated. Non-invasive ventilation was used in 3% and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in 5.3%. 3% received intra-aortic balloon pump support and 1.5% underwent dialysis or ultrafiltration. 4.5% received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), although none of them developed bundle branch block or atrioventricular node block, nor AF. After discharge, 11.1% had recurrent ACS, and up to 5.6% underwent PCI again, with a mortality rate of 11.8%. Conclusion Approximately 2% of ACS occur in people younger than 40 years of age. Substance abuse (smoking, cocaine and alcoholism) becomes more prevalent in this group. Prevalence of comorbidities (such as diabetes and nephropathy) are lower, making them less prone to short-term heart failure. However, they are more susceptible to recurrent ischemic events. There is a high incidence of inferior STEMI and LM-STEMI. For these reasons, medicians may need to find out a substance abuse in this group and further research into other risk factors, such as coronary disease family history.Basal characteristicsClinical evolution of patients

Contemporary Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Indigenous Compared with Non-Indigenous Patients: A Northern Saskatchewan Perspective

In patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the impact of efforts leveraged at bridging historical care gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients remains limited. For consecutive ACS presentations (STEMI and NSTEMI/UA, respectively) at the Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, we compared between self-identified Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients their demographics, treatments and all-cause mortality (in-hospital and 3-years). We used propensity score-inverse probability weighting to mitigate confounding, and Cox regression models to estimate the adjusted hazard (aHR, 95% confidence intervals) for all-cause mortality. Of 3946 ACS patients, 37.2% (n=1468) were STEMI of whom 11.3% (n=166) were Indigenous. Of the NSTEMI/UA (n=2478), 12.6% (n=311) were Indigenous. Overall, Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous patients were likely to be younger, female, have higher risk burden, and lived more remotely; Indigenous STEMI patients triaged to primary PCI had longer first medical contact-to-device times, while Indigenous NSTEMI/UA patients more likely to present with heart failure, cardiac arrest and/or cardiogenic shock. No significant differences were noted for in-hospital mortality (STEMI 8.4% vs 5.7%, p= 0.16; NSTEMI/UA 1.9% vs 1.6%, p=0.68), however, in follow-up, Indigenous STEMI patients associated with a higher all-cause mortality risk (aHR 1.98, 95% CI 1.19, 3.31, p=0.009) with no between-group differences evident for NSTEMI/UA (aHR 1.03, 95% CI 0.63 1.69, p=0.91). Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous patients presenting with an ACS had higher cardiovascular risk profiles, and consequently residual mortality risk. Improving primary care and intensifying secondary risk reduction, and particularly so for Indigenous patients, will substantially modify ACS outcomes in Saskatchewan.

Clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome after presentation of unique electrocardiographic findings

BackgroundUnique electrocardiographic findings are rarely observed in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with a culprit left anterior coronary artery (LAD). The aim of this study was to assess the epidemiological features and prognostic impact. MethodsThis study was designed as an observational study. A total of 641 patients with a culprit lesion in the left main trunk or LAD were extracted from a cohort of 1776 ACS patients. The primary endpoint was mortality, comparing patients presenting with unique electrocardiogram patterns, specifically the de Winter pattern or Wellens' syndrome (type A or B), upon hospital arrival, with those presenting common electrocardiogram patterns. ResultsA unique electrocardiogram was observed in 7.0% (n = 45; 2 with de Winter pattern, 14 with Wellens' type A and 29 with type B). Compared to patients with a common pattern, cardiogenic shock at hospital arrival were rare in patients with a unique pattern (0% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.04), and percutaneous coronary intervention was primary revascularization strategy in all groups (95.6% vs. 98.2%). The mortality rates were similar between the two groups over a median 565 days of observation period (13.3% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.43), with 0% in Wellens' type A, 13.8% in type B, and both patients with the de Winter pattern died. ConclusionThe de Winter pattern or the Wellens syndrome was found in 7.0% of cases with ACS. They had similar mortality rates compared to those with a common pattern, although the de Winter pattern was identified in only 2 patients.

Management Considerations for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Propensity of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to adverse outcomes of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) derives, in part, from imperfection in management. Dearth of data resulting from underrepresentation of patients with CKD in ACS trials and underuse of evidence-based testing and therapy compound biological risks inherent to CKD. We sought in this narrative review to critically appraise contemporary evidence and offer suggested approaches to practicing clinicians for the optimization of ACS management in patients with CKD. Updated multisociety chest pain guidelines emphasize the diversity of clinical presentations of ACS, pertinent to recognition of ACS in patients with CKD. Evolving tools to predict and prevent acute kidney injury complicating invasive management of ACS serve to support improved access to and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in CKD patients, who remain at elevated risk. Growth in use of radial access, advances in PCI quality, incorporation of intravascular imaging, and new options and insights in pharmacotherapy contribute to an evolving calculus of ischemic and bleeding risk in ACS with bearing on management in CKD patients. Key opportunities to improve outcomes of ACS for patients with CKD center on avoiding underuse of beneficial medical and invasive therapies; enhancing safety of therapies by leveraging evidence-based strategies to prevent acute kidney injury; and devoting specific effort to investigation of ACS management in the context of CKD.

Can prolonged P-R interval predict clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients?

BackgroundThe present study aimed to respond to clinical question, can prolonged P-R interval predict clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients?MethodsThis descriptive-analytical study was conducted on cardiac patients. All of the non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) including non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina patients included in the study. Then they divided into two groups: prolonged P-R interval and normal P-R interval. The patients who had a history of digoxin and calcium channel blocker use, using antiarrhythmic drugs, known valvular or congenital heart disease and connective tissue, unreadable P-R interval and cardiac block were excluded. Data were collected using the questionnaire consisted demographic data and clinical outcomes and a follow-up part was completed by one of the researchers.ResultsFinally, 248 patients completed the study. The results showed both of the two groups had significant differences in terms of the history of myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.018), the level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (p = 0.004), heart rate (p = 0.042), inverted T wave (p = 0.017), anterior ST- segment depression (p = 0.008), normal report of coronary angiography (CAG) (p = 0.003), three vessels disease (p = 0.043), left main lesion (p = 0.045) and SYNTAX score (p = 0.032) based on the CAG report. The results of six-month follow-up showed although, the frequency of ischemic stroke, coronary artery disease (CAD) and cardiovascular death were higher in prolonged P-R interval groups. The chi-square test showed this difference was statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression model revealed non-significant relationships between prolonged P-R interval and SYNTAX score, significant CAD, three-vessel disease, inverted T wave, anterior ST depression, heart rate and HDL.ConclusionsBased on the results of our study the six-month follow-up showed non-significant outcomes. Further studies are recommended to assess the long-term outcomes.

Body Mass Index and Outcomes in Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a cardiac disorder that mimics acute coronary syndrome at presentation. While previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in acute coronary syndrome, few have examined its relationship with TTS. Methods: Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively identified 14,551 patients admitted for TTS between 2010 and 2021. By applying multivariable regressions with restricted cubic splines, we examined the association between BMI and in-hospital mortality after adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Mean BMI was 21.1 kg/m2, classifying patients into severe underweight (2, 7.1%), mild/moderate underweight (16.0–18.4 kg/m2, 18.3%), normal weight (18.5–22.9 kg/m2, 46.8%), overweight (23.0–27.4 kg/m2, 22.2%), and obese (≥27.5 kg/m2, 5.6%) groups. Patients with severe or mild/moderate underweight were older and had a higher prevalence of impaired physical activity, malignancy, chronic pulmonary disease, and pneumonia. In-hospital mortality was the highest (9.4%) in the severe underweight group, followed by the mild/moderate underweight group (5.4%), with the lowest being in the obese group (2.1%). Severe underweight (adjusted odds ratio = 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.54–2.73) and mild/moderate underweight (1.26; 95% CI = 1.01–1.57) were significantly associated with higher mortality compared with normal weight, while no significant association was noted with obesity. A nonlinear association between continuous BMI and mortality was observed, with mortality increasing when BMI decreased 2 but nearly plateauing in BMI >20.0 kg/m2. Conclusions: The present nationwide analysis demonstrated a nonlinear association between BMI and in-hospital mortality of TTS. BMI is an easily available and clinically relevant marker for the risk stratification of TTS.

Age shock index as an early predictor of cardiovascular death in acute coronary syndrome patients.

The shock index (SI), reflecting heart rate (HR) to SBP ratio, is established for predicting adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Exploring the age shock index (ASI), obtained by multiplying SI with age, could offer further insights into ACS prognosis. Assess ASI's effectiveness in predicting in-hospital death in individuals with ACS. This study encompassed patients with acute myocardial infarction, drawn from a national registry spanning October 2010 to January 2022. The optimal ASI threshold was established using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A total of 27 312 patients were enrolled, exhibiting a mean age of 66 ± 13 years, with 72.3% being male and 47.5% having ST-elevation myocardial infarction. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, identifying the optimal ASI cutoff as 44. Multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, established ASI ≥ 44 as an independent predictor of in-hospital death [hazard ratio: 3.09, 95% confidence interval: 2.56-3.71, P < 0.001]. Furthermore, ASI emerged as a notably superior predictor of in-hospital death compared to the SI (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC SI = 0.72, P < 0.0001), though it did not outperform the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC GRACE = 0.85, P < 0.001) or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk index (AUC ASI = 0.80 vs. AUC TIMI = 0.84, P < 0.001). The ASI offers an expedient mean to promptly identify ACS patients at elevated risk of in-hospital death. Its simplicity and effectiveness could render it a valuable tool for early risk stratification in this population.

Long-Term Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Chronic Versus Acute Coronary Syndromes (TARGET All Comers Trial)

In the Targeted therapy with a localised abluminal coated, low-dose sirolimus-eluting, biodegreadable polymer coronary stent (TARGET; NCT02520180) All Comers trial the biodegradable polymer (BP) sirolimus-eluting FIREHAWK stent was noninferior to the durable polymer (DP) everolimus-eluting XIENCE stent with respect to target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 and 5 years; however, the long-term safety and efficacy in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are not known. We sought to assess the long-term outcomes in ACS versus chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) with BP sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus DP everolimus-eluting stent (EES). The TARGET AC study was a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial of all comer patients randomly allocated 1:1 to BP SES or DP EES (stratified by ST-elevation myocardial infarction and study site). In this predefined substudy, the outcomes were compared based on clinical presentation (ACS vs CCS) and treatment allocation. A total of 1,653 patients were enrolled (728 with ACS and 922 with CCS), with 94% completing the 5-year follow-up. The baseline characteristics were well-matched between the 2 stent types; however, co-morbidities were more prevalent in the CCS than in the ACS population. TLF (15.5% vs 17.7%, p = 0.24), patient-oriented outcomes (32.0% vs 34.4%, p = 0.31), and stent thrombosis (4.1% vs 3.3%, p = 0.40) were similar between patients with ACS and patients with CCS. In the ACS cohort, the outcomes at 5 years for BP SES versus DP EES were similar for TLF (16.0% vs 14.9%, p = 0.70), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (5.6% vs 8.3%, p = 0.17), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (2.7% vs 4.6%, p = 0.18). The same was true for the CCS cohort, with 5-year outcomes for BP SES versus DP EES for TLF (18.0% vs 17.4%, p = 0.82), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (6.4% vs 5.0%, p = 0.37), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (3.0% vs 1.8%, p = 0.26). In conclusion, in the TARGET AC trial, 1 in 3 patients had a major adverse event at 5 years, irrespective of CCS or ACS presentation. Long-term, the BP sirolimus-eluting FIREHAWK stent was as safe and effective as the DP everolimus-eluting XIENCE stent across the spectrum of clinical presentations.

Sex and Ethnic Disparities during COVID-19 Pandemic among Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Introduction: The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a global pandemic that emerged in 2019. During this period, a significant disparity in hospitalization and mortality rates emerged, particularly in terms of Ethnicity and sex. Notably, this study aims to examine the influence of sex and Ethnicity on acute coronary syndrome outcomes, specifically during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in the United States in 2020. Primary outcomes included inpatient mortality and the time from admission to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Secondary outcomes encompassed the length of stay and hospital costs. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to identify and study patients in our test group. Results: A total of 779,895 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in the year 2020 and 935,975 patients in 2019 were included in this study. Baseline findings revealed that inpatient mortality was significantly higher in 2020 compared to 2019, regardless of sex and Ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.23, p-value &lt; 0.001). Concerning primary outcomes, there was no difference in inpatient mortality for hospitalized patients of different sexes between 2019 and 2020 (STEMI: aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96–1.14, p-value 0.22; NSTEMI/UA aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98–1.19, p-value 0.13). Regarding time to admission for PCI, NSTEMI/UA cases were found to be statistically significant in female patients compared to males (mean difference 0.06 days, 95% CI 0.02–0.10, p-value &lt; 0.01) and African Americans compared to Caucasians (mean difference 0.13 days, 95% CI 0.06–0.19, p &lt; 0.001). In terms of the length of stay, female patients had a shorter length of stay compared to males (mean difference −0.22, 95% CI −0.27 to −0.16, p-value &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: As acute coronary syndrome is an urgent diagnosis, a global pandemic has the potential to exacerbate existing healthcare disparities related to sex and Ethnicity. This study did not reveal any difference in inpatient mortality, aligning with studies conducted prior to the pandemic. However, it highlighted significantly longer treatment times (admission to PCI) for NSTEMI/UA management in female and African American populations. These findings suggest that some disparities may have diminished during the pandemic year, warranting further research to confirm these trends in the years to come.

SuPAR in cardiovascular disease.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), the soluble counterpart of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, is found in the circulation at various levels. suPAR and its parent molecule, cell surface uPAR, exhibit similar structure and extracellular functional roles facilitating fibrinolysis, cellular adhesion, and migration. Studies have assessed the correlation between suPAR in cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is postulated that suPAR may serve as an indicator of inflammatory activation and burden during CVD progression. Increased suPAR independently predicts poorer outcomes in acute coronary syndromes, in heart failure, as well as in coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis. To guide translation into clinical utization, suPAR has been assessed in numerous CVD settings for improved risk discrimination independently or in association with established traditional risk factors. Whilst the involvement of suPAR has been explored in other diseases such as kidney diseases and cancer, there is only emerging evidence of suPAR's mechanistic involvement in cardiovascular disease. In this review, we provide a background into suPAR and its potential role as a biomarker in CVD.

Impact of Sickle Cell Disease on Acute Coronary Syndrome and PCI Outcomes

Impact of Sickle Cell Disease on Acute Coronary Syndrome and PCI Outcomes

Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular outcome in patients post acute coronary syndrome

Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular outcome in patients post acute coronary syndrome

Evaluation of Uric Acid to Albumin Ratio as a Marker of Coronary Artery Disease Severity in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a widespread cause of morbidity and mortality. Serum uric acid, a mediator of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in vascular disease, can increase the risk of atherosclerosis, contributing to CAD. As serum albumin inhibits platelet activation and aggregation, low levels of it can contribute to platelet-induced coronary artery stenosis. Limited studies have been conducted worldwide in evaluating the role of uric acid to albumin ratio (UAR) in predicting severity or poor outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. This study was undertaken to assess the role of UAR as a predictor of CAD severity, which can facilitate the identification of high-risk patients. A hospital-based analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in an urban tertiary healthcare center for a period of two months between June and August of 2022. A total of 100 ACS patients were included in the study. The study population included patients above the age of 18 years diagnosed with ACS who underwent a coronary angiography. Coronary angiograms were used to diagnose the presence of CAD, and its severity was assessed using Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) scores (SS). The correlation of UAR with CAD severity using SS was studied and compared between three varieties of ACS: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina (UA). Chi-squared tests were used to determine statistical significance for qualitative data.Independent t-tests were used to identify the mean difference between two quantitative variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for UAR and high SS. A comparison between UAR and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of disease severity was done.ROC and optimal cutoff points were chosen to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and SPSS V22.0(IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) were used to analyze the data. A total of 100 ACS patients were included in the study and divided into two groups on the basis of SS, with 74% showing low severity and 26% showing intermediate-high severity. There was a statistically significant difference found between older age and SS (p=0.017). Our study showed 74% (n=74) of the patients were male and 26% (n=26) were female. It also revealed that 75.7% (n=56) of the male patients were in the low-severity group, and 24.3% (n=18) of males were in the intermediate-high severity group. 69.2% (n=18) of the female patients were in the low-severity group, and 30.8% (n=8) were in the intermediate-high severity group. Of the 100 patients, 55% were diagnosed with STEMI, of which 69.1% were in the low-severity group, and 30.9% were in the intermediate-high severity group. Among all the patients 33% of the patients were diagnosed as NSTEMI, of which 72.7% were in the low-severity group, and 27.3% were in the intermediate-high severity group. Twelve percent of the patients were diagnosed with UA, and 100% of these patients were in the low-severity group. The mean UAR was 1.40 ± 0.38 in the low-severity group and 1.29 ± 0.46 in the intermediate-high severity group (p=0.22). Our study yielded no statistically significant difference in UAR among varying severities of CAD.

Sex differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome-Still an issue of equal treatment?

Significant sex-specific differences were described in the presentation, management and outcome of acute coronary syndrom (ACS) patients. Female ACS patients more often presented with noncardiac symptoms, which lead to significant time delays between symptom onset and treatment. Furthermore, multiple studies from various countries described that women with ACS were less likely to receive the medical or reperfusion therapy recommended by the respective guidelines, resulting in higher in-hospital mortality rates.The treating physicians and the patients need to be more aware of the described differences to ensure the best possible medical care for ACS patients, irrespective of sex.

Long-term PCI outcomes in chronic versus acute coronary syndromes: 5-year results of the TARGET All Comers trial

Abstract Introduction In the TARGET AC trial, the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting Firehawk stent was non-inferior to the everolimus-eluting XIENCE stent with respect to target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months; however, long-term safety and efficacy in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are not known. Purpose To assess the long-term outcomes in ACS vs chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) with the Firehawk stent vs the XIENCE stent Methods The TARGET AC study was a multicentre, open label, noninferiority trial of all comer patients randomised 1:1 (stratified by STEMI) to Firehawk or XIENCE stents. In this substudy, outcomes were compared based on clinical presentation (ACS vs CCS) and treatment allocation. Results A total of 1653 patients were enrolled (728 with ACS and 922 with CCS) with 94% completing 5-year follow-up. Baseline characteristics were well matched. Target lesion failure (TLF) (15.5% vs 17.7%; p=0.24), patient-oriented composite endpoint (death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization) (32.0% vs 34.4%; p=0.31), and stent thrombosis (4.1% vs 3.3%; p=0.40) were similar between ACS and CCS patients (Table 1). Among the ACS cohort, outcomes at 5 years for Firehawk vs XIENCE were not different for TLF (16.0% vs 14.9%; p=0.70), ischemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (ID-TLR) (5.6% vs 8.3%; p=0.17), or definite/probable stent thrombosis (2.7% vs 4.6%; p=0.18). The same was true for the CCS cohort, with 5-year outcomes for Firehawk vs XIENCE for TLF (18.0% vs 17.4%; p=0.82), ID-TLR (6.4% vs 5.0%; p=0.37), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (3.0% vs 1.8%; p=0.26) similar between groups. Conclusions One in three patients presenting with CCS or ACS had a major adverse event at 5 years. Long-term, the Firehawk stent was as safe and effective as the XIENCE stent irrespective of clinical presentation.

Stress hyperglycemia ratio and long-term clinical outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background Stress hyperglycemia is strongly associated with adverse prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recently, the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR- relationship between acute/chronic glycemic values) has been proposed as a better measurement of stress hyperglycemia. Studies on SHR and long-term clinical outcome in ACS are limited. This study aimed to clarify the association between SHR and 3-year adverse clinical events in patients with ACS. Methods We analyzed data of 795 patients admitted to our center for ACS who were enrolled in the PRATO-ACS Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04087200) and underwent laboratory analyses 1 month after the index event. All patients had undergone early invasive strategy and received high intensity statins during hospitalization and at discharge. Patients were stratified in baseline SHR tertiles: &amp;lt; 0.95, ≥ 0.95 to &amp;lt; 1.17 and ≥ 1.17. The primary end point was 3-year all cause death; secondary end points were major adverse clinical events (MACE) including all-cause death, myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure. The association between SHR and outcome measures was evaluated with Cox proportional analysis expressed by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results With increasing SHR, there was a significant progressive increase in mortality (4.2, 8.3, and 11.7% in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd tertile, respectively, p= 0.006) and MACE (10.6, 14, and 20.8% in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd tertile, respectively, p=0.004). Multivariable analysis shows that SHR was an independent predictor of 3-year all-cause death (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12-2.4; p= 0.012). Subgroup analysis evidenced that the relationship between SHR and mortality was statistically significant only for patients with poor glycemic control at 1 month follow up (HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.14-10.9, p= 0.02 in the 2nd tertile and HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.3-11.8, p= 0.015 in the 3rd tertile). Conclusion Baseline SHR is significantly associated with 3-year all-cause death and MACE in patients with ACS. However, its prognostic impact is much stronger in patients who do not achieve desired glycemic targets at 1 month after the index event. Therefore, insistent attention to glycemic values is mandatory in ACS patients even after discharge.