Outcomes Of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Research Articles

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system: A single-center initial experience in Japan.

Recently, various novel robotic systems have been put into clinical use. The aim of the present study was to assess the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Hugo™ RAS system, one of brand-new robot-assisted surgical platforms. We performed RARP with the Hugo™ RAS system in 13 cases of localized prostate cancer (PCa) between August 2023 and February 2024 at our hospital. The perioperative outcomes of these 13 patients were assessed. The median operative and console times were 197 (interquartile range [IQR], 187-228) and 134 min (IQR, 125-157), respectively. The median docking time was 7 min (IQR, 6-10), and the median estimated blood loss was 150 mL (IQR, 80-250). The vesical catheter was removed on postoperative day 6 in all cases. A positive surgical margin was observed in one patient (7.7%), and none experienced major perioperative complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3. The median postoperative length of stay was 8 days (IQR, 8-8.5). This was the first study to focus on RARP using the Hugo™ RAS system in Japan. Although further investigations should be conducted to assess the long-term oncological and functional outcomes, the Hugo™ RAS system could provide safe and favorable perioperative outcomes for patients with localized PCa undergoing RARP.

Da Vinci vs. Hugo RAS for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative single-center study.

To evaluate Hugo RAS against the Da Vinci system for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) in prostate cancer treatment. We compared outcomes of 150 patients with prostate cancer undergoing RARP with either Hugo or Da Vinci systems. Our analysis included operative, postoperative, pathological, and functional outcomes. Both groups had 75 patients. Baseline characteristics and tumor features were similar. Intraoperatively, Da Vinci had a shorter docking time (10.45 vs. 18.62min, p = 0.02), but total operative times were comparable (145.34 vs 138.95, p = 0.85). Hugo outperformed in neck dissection and lymphadenectomy times (22 vs 13.67min, p = 0.027 and 37.82 vs 45.77min, p = 0.025). Postoperative metrics like stay duration, catheter time, and complications showed no significant difference. Functional results, using IPSS and IIEF5, were similar between systems. Six Da Vinci patients (8%) and nine Hugo patients (12%) experienced social incontinence (p = 0.072). Pathological outcomes like T stage, Gleason Score, and nodes removed were alike. However, Hugo had more positive surgical margins (20% vs. 10.67%, p = 0.034). RARP outcomes using Hugo RAS were similar to the Da Vinci system in our study. More research and extended follow-up are required to ascertain long-term oncological and functional results.

Impact of the coronavirus disease pandemic on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and urologists' treatment behaviors: A single tertiary center retrospective study.

To assess whether the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic affected the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and urologists' treatment behaviors. We retrospectively examined the medical records of 208 patients who had undergone RARP between August 2017 and December 2022. We compared the rate of preoperative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), waiting period for RARP, patients' baseline characteristics and quality of life (QOL), proportion of adverse pathology on the RARP specimen, rate of Gleason grade group upgrading from biopsy to the RARP specimen, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence-free survival between the pre-pandemic and pandemic groups. The rate of preoperative ADT was significantly higher during than before the COVID-19 pandemic (13.7% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.002). The baseline physical and mental QOL scores did not differ significantly between the groups. The proportion of D'Amico low-risk patients was significantly lower (13.6% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.005) and waiting period for RARP was significantly shorter (median 3.5 months vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.016) in the pandemic group than in the pre-pandemic group. There was no significant difference in the proportion of adverse pathology between the groups (p = 0.104); however, the upgrading rate was significantly higher in the pre-pandemic group (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in PSA recurrence-free survival between the groups (log-rank, p = 0.752). The COVID-19 pandemic did not adversely affect the oncologic outcomes of RARP and QOL before RARP. However, it caused urologists to increase the use of preoperative ADT and to reserve RARP for higher-risk cases.

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with the Novel Hugo™ RAS System: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

Background/Objectives: to assess surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using the novel Hugo™ RAS system. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Eligible papers included studies involving adult males undergoing RARP with the Hugo™ RAS platform, with at least ten patients analyzed. The pooled analysis was performed using a random-effect model. Results: Quantitative analysis was conducted on 12 studies including 579 patients. The pooled median docking time, console time, and operative time were 11 min (95% CI 7.95-14.50; I2 = 98.4%, ten studies), 142 min (95% CI 119.74-164.68; I2 = 96.5%, seven studies), and 176 min (95% CI 148.33-203.76; I2 = 96.3%, seven studies), respectively. The pooled median estimated blood loss was 223 mL (95% CI 166.75-280.17; I2 = 96.5%, eleven studies). The pooled median length of hospital stay and time to catheter removal were 2.8 days (95% CI 1.67-3.89; I2 = 100%, ten studies) and 8.3 days (95% CI 5.53-11.09; I2 = 100%, eight studies), respectively. The pooled rate of postoperative CD ≥ 2 complications was 4.1% (95% CI 1-8.5; I2 = 63.6%, eleven studies). The pooled rate of positive surgical margins and undetectable postoperative PSA were 20% (95% CI 12.6-28.5; I2 = 71.5%, nine studies) and 94.2% (95% CI 87.7-98.6; I2 = 48.9%, three studies), respectively. At three months, a pooled rate of social continence of 81.9% (95% CI 73.8-88.9; I2 = 66.7%, seven studies) was found. Erectile function at six months was 31% in one study. Conclusions: despite the preliminary nature of the evidence, this systematic review and pooled analysis underscores the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of the Hugo™ RAS system in the context of RARP.

HinotoriTM vs. da Vinci®: propensity score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

hinotori™ is a recently developed surgical robot system. The present study aims to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by the hinotori™ system compared with those of the longer-established da Vinci® system. This study includes 100 consecutive patients who underwent RARP by da Vinci® and 60 patients who underwent RARP by hinotori™. To minimize imbalances of patient demographics between the two groups, 1:1 propensity score-matching was performed, and 43 patients each were assigned to the da Vinci® and hinotori™ groups after matching. In the propensity score-matched cohort, we could not find significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Surgical outcomes, operative time, and console time in the hinotori™ group were significantly longer than those in the da Vinci® group. Meanwhile, we could not find significant differences in other outcomes between the two groups, such as estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or 4) or length of hospital stay after surgery. The rate of positive cancer margin in the hinotori™ group was higher than that in the da Vinci® group, but significant difference could not be found between the two groups. Moreover, we could not find significant differences in urinary continence rates after surgery between the da Vinci® and hinotori™ groups. Our results suggest that the hinotori™ surgical robot system could provide comparable surgical outcomes to that of the da Vinci® system for patients undergoing RARP.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients after endoscopic surgeries on the prostate

Background. In literature, data on the results of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are contradictory.Aim. To evaluate surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of RARP after TURP.Materials and methods. At the Urology Center of the Mariinsky Hospital (Saint Petersburg), RARP was performed on 410 patients. Among them, 28 (6.8 %) patients (1st group) previously underwent TURP due to infravesical obstruction. Among them, 18 (64.3 %) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer after pathomorphological examination of the tissue resected during TURP, and on them RARP was performed on average 3.2 months later. In 10 (35.7 %) patients, prostate cancer was diagnosed during transrectal biopsy due to increased prostate-specific antigen level; on them RARP was performed on average 42.0 months after TURP. The following parameters were evaluated: operative time, time of bladder neck reconstruction and urethrovesical anastomosis formation, blood loss volume, tumor pathological stage, Gleason score, surgical margin status, rates of urine continence and preservation of erectile function.Results. Mean operative time was higher in the 1st group compared to the 2nd: 210 ± 36 min versus 180 ± 25 min (р <0.0001). In the 1st group compared to the 2nd, reconstruction of bladder neck was necessary more frequently (82.1 % versus 10.7 %; р <0.0001), urethrovesical anastomosis took longer time (32 ± 2.3 min versus 24.5 ± 3.1 min; р <0.0001), mean blood loss volume was higher (240 ± 39 mL versus 170 ± 32 mL; р <0.0001). Frequencies of positive surgical margin were 14.3 and 10.7 % respectively in the 1st and 2nd groups (р = 0.840). Frequencies of all complications were 28.6 and 21.4 %, respectively. Severe complications (≥IIIb grade per the Clavien classification) were observed in 2 (7.1 %) patients in both groups. Frequency of anastomosis stricture after surgery was significantly higher in the 1st group: in 2 (7.1 %) and 1 (3.6 %) case, respectively (р <0.05). In the 1st group, total urinary continence was achieved in 14 (50.0 %), 20 (71.5 %), 22 (78.5 %) and 25 (89.3 %) patients at early and 3-, 6and 12-month follow-up after RARP; in the 2nd group, it was achieved in 18 (64.3 %), 22 (78.6 %), 24 (85.7 %) and 26 (92.9 %) patients in the same follow-up periods. After 6 and 12 months, in the 1st group among 15 (53.6 %) patients with normal initial erectile function, satisfactory erectile function was preserved in 46.7 and 93.3 % of patients; in the 2nd group among 19 (67.8 %) patients, in 57.8 and 94.7 % patients, respectively.Conclusion. RARP after TURP is a relatively complicated surgical intervention with long operative time and high blood loss volume. However, functional and short-term oncological outcomes of RARP in these patients do not differ at 12 months.

Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with preservation of pelvic stabilized structure and early elevated retrograde liberation of neurovascular bundle

Objectives: To examine the functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with preservation of pelvic floor stabilized structure and early elevated retrograde liberation of the neurovascular bundle (PEEL). Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study. Between June 1, 2022, and March 20, 2023, 27 cases of RARP with PEEL and 153 cases of RARP with preservation of pelvic floor stabilized structure (PPSS) were included in this study. All patients were males, aged (62.5±5.2) years (range: 50 to 73 years). There were 18 cases of ≤T2b stage and 9 cases of T2c stage. After 1∶1 propensity score matching, the postoperative functional outcomes of 27 cases of RARP with PEEL and 27 cases of RARP with PPSS were compared. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon and included patients were clinically staged as cT1-2N0M0 without preoperative urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction. In RARP with PEEL, the prostate was cut near the midline at the front when dissecting the neurovascular bundle, dissection was performed between the visceral layer of the pelvic fascia and the prostatic fascia, preserving the parietal layer and the visceral layer of the pelvic fascia, and the neurovascular bundle was retrogradely released from the apex. The cumulative probability curve was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test was used to compare the differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare postoperative urinary continence and sexual function. Results: The recovery time of continence and potency was significantly longer in the PPSS group than in the PEEL group (all P<0.05). The continence rate of the PEEL group was significantly higher than that of the PPSS group (92.59% vs. 68.10%, P=0.026) at 3 months after surgery. The potency rate of the PEEL group was also significantly higher than that of the PPSS group (40.70% vs. 15.10%, P=0.037) at 3 months after surgery. In the univariate analysis, compared to the PPSS technique, the PEEL technique was associated with a shorter recovery time of continence (HR=1.94, 95%CI: 1.08 to 3.48, P=0.027) and a shorter recovery time of potency (HR=2.06, 95%CI: 1.03 to 4.13, P=0.042). In the multivariate analysis, the PEEL technique was an independent prognosis factor for postoperative recovery of continence (HR=2.05, 95%CI: 1.01 to 4.17, P=0.047) and potency (HR=3.57, 95%CI: 1.43 to 8.92, P=0.007). All the cases of the PPSS group and the PEEL group were performed successfully with negative surgical margins. Conclusion: Compared with PPSS, PEEL may be more conducive to the recovery of urinary continence and sexual function after RARP.

Technological development of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy have shown remarkable improvement over the last two decades since its advent, due to advances in surgical concepts, techniques, and equipment. Today, ongoing research aims to compare the benefits and drawbacks of various surgical approaches, such as anterior, posterior, lateral, transvesical, and transperineal approaches, in terms of tumor control, functional recovery, and complication reduction in order to achieve the goal of pentafecta (no postoperative complications and negative surgical margins in addition to trifecta) to the maximum extent. It is imperative to explore and integrate novel technologies such as 5G remote surgery and artificial intelligence into the clinical practice of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy while ensuring patient safety, which has immense potential for substantial benefits to patients with prostate cancer.

Urinary Incontinence Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Literature Review.

Prostate cancer ranks as one of the most prevalent cancers among men in the United States, contributing significantly to cancer-related mortality. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a cornerstone in the management of localized prostate cancer. This literature review delves into the outcomes of RARP, specifically its impact on urinary incontinence (UI) compared to other surgical methods. We also present the importance of patient perception versus medical reports. Recent studies and trials have unveiled that postoperative UIand erectile dysfunction (ED) remain common concerns following prostatectomy. However, studies have shown that RARP has lower occurrences of UI and ED compared to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). While the choice of surgical method may not drastically affect these outcomes, the review emphasizes that urinary incontinence extends beyond physical symptoms. It profoundly impacts patients' psychological well-being, social interactions, and overall quality of life. Differences in symptom recording and interpretation between patients and healthcare professionals can significantly influence the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Enhanced patient-physician communication and patient-centered care are essential to providing a holistic approach to prostate cancer management. The choice of surgical methods may not significantly impact postoperative urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Continued research and advancements in treatment and patient care are crucial for improving outcomes and the overall well-being of prostate cancer patients.

Six-year outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer: Apropensity score-matched analysis.

Although robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy are the leading respective techniques of prostatectomy and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, almost no study has directly compared their outcomes; none have compared mortality outcomes. We compared 6‑year outcomes of RARP (n = 500) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT, arotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy, n = 360) in patients with cT1-4N0M0 prostate cancer. We assessed oncological outcomes, namely overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), radiological recurrence-free survival (rRFS), and biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), using propensity score matching (PSM). We also assessed treatment-related complication outcomes of prostatectomy and radiotherapy. The median follow-up duration was 79months (> 6years). PSM generated amatched cohort of 260 patients (130 per treatment group). In the matched cohort, RARP and VMAT showed equivalent results for OS, CSS, and rRFS: both achieved excellent 6‑year outcomes for OS (> 96%), CSS (> 98%), and rRFS (> 91%). VMAT had significantly longer bRFS than RARP, albeit based on different definitions of biochemical recurrence. Regarding complication outcomes, patients who underwent RARP had minimal (2.6%) severe perioperative complications and achieved excellent continence recovery (91.6and 68.8% of the patients achieved ≤ 1pad/day and pad-free, respectively). Patients who underwent VMAT had an acceptable rate (20.0%) of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary complications and avery low rate (4.4%) of grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal complications. On the basis of PSM after a6-year follow-up, RARP and VMAT showed equivalent and excellent oncological outcomes, as well as acceptable complication profiles.

Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor

Background: Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate. Objectives: The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA). Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score ⩾ 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months. Results: PSAD showed a significant association with PSM ( p &lt; 0.0001), PSA persistence ( p &lt; 0.0001), and Gleason ⩾ 7 ( p &lt; 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR ( p = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 versus 0.771) and Gleason ⩾ 7 (AUC 0.683 versus 0.649). Conclusion: PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score ⩾ 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.

Impacts on functional and oncological outcomes of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy 10 years after the US Preventive Service Taskforce recommendations against PSA screening.

In the following years after the United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation against prostate cancer screening with PSA in 2012, several authors worldwide described an increase in higher grades and aggressive prostate tumors. In this scenario, we aim to evaluate the potential impacts of USPSTF recommendations on the functional and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a referral center. We included 11396 patients who underwent RARP between 2008 and 2021. Each patient had at least a 12-month follow-up. The cohort was divided into two groups based on an inflection point in the outcomes at the end of 2012 and the beginning of 2013. The inflection point period was detected by Bayesian regression with multiple change points and regression with unknown breakpoints. We reported continuous variables as median and interquartile range (IQR) and categorical variables as absolute and relative percent frequencies. Group 1 had 4760 patients, and Group 2 had 6636 patients, with a median follow-up of 109 and 38 months, respectively. In the final pathology, Group 2 had 9.5% increase in tumor volume, 24% increase on Gleason ≥ 4+3 (ISUP 3) , and 18% increase on ≥ pT3. This translated to a 6% increase in positive surgical margins and 24% reduction in full nerve sparing in response to the worsening pathology. There was a significant decline in post-operative outcomes in Group 2, including a 12-month continence reduction of 9%, reduction in potency by 27%, and reduction of trifecta by 22%. The increasing number of high-risk patients has led to worse functional and oncologic outcomes. The initial rapid rise in PSM was leveled by the move towards more partial nerve sparing. Among somehistorical changes in prostate cancer diagnosis and management in the period of our study, theUSPSTF recommendationcoincided with worseoutcomes of prostate cancer treatment in a population who could benefit from PSA screening at the appropriate time.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with Retzius-Sparing approach vs. modified Frankfurt: comparison of results at 1 year of follow-up

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has positioned itself as the approach of choice in the treatment of prostate cancer. To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Retzius-Sparing (RS) approach against the modified Frankfurt (MF) technique. To describe the perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes of 13 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RS robotic radical prostatectomy compared to MF, evaluating pathological results, urinary continence, sexual function and oncological control in 1 year of follow-up. The average age was 64 years in RS group vs. 61 years in MF group. The values of total prostate antigen were higher in the RS group (25 ng/dl) vs. MF group (11 ng/dl). The volume of gland in RS group was 40.62 ml vs. 63.33 ml in the RS group. All patients were bilaterally neuropreserved, being statistically significant in favor of MF group (p = 0.016). Positive surgical margins were higher in R-S group (38.4%) vs. MF group (33.3%). With RS the same tendency to urinary continence is observed, with a significant difference in erectile function in favor of MF. This preliminary study shows better impact on erectile function.

"Single-Surgeon" versus "Dual-Surgeon" Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph-nodes Dissection: Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.

To compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with pelvic lymph-nodes dissection (PLND) when the same surgeon performs RARP and PLND versus one surgeon performs RARP and another surgeon performs PLND. From January 2022 to March 2023, data of consecutive patients who underwent RARP with PLND were prospectively collected. The surgeries were performed by two "young" surgeons with detailed profile. Specifically for the study purpose, one surgeon performed RARP, and the other surgeon performed PLND. A set of surgeries performed according to the standard setup (i.e., the same surgeon performing both RARP and PLND) was retrieved from the institutional database and used as comparator arm. To test the study hypothesis, patients were divided into two groups: "dual-surgeon" versus "single-surgeon". Fifty patients underwent RARP and PLND performed according to dual-surgeon setup and were compared to the last 50 procedures performed according to the standard single-surgeon setup. Patients in the groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Dual-surgeon interventions had significantly shorter median total operative (194 [IQR 178-215] versus 174 [IQR 146-195] minutes, p<0.001) and console time (173 [IQR 158-194] versus 154 [IQR 129-170] minutes, p<0.001). No significant differences were found in terms of blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative outcomes, and final pathology results. The present analysis found that when RARP and PLND are split onto two surgeons, the operative time is shorter by 20 minutes compared to when a single surgeon performs RARP and PLND. This is an interesting finding that could sponsor further studies.

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been shown to achieve excellent oncological outcomes with a low rate of complications in patients with prostate cancer. However, data on RARP in renal transplant recipients (RT) are dispersed. A literature search was conducted through April 2023 using PubMed/Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases. The primary aim was to evaluate the safety, oncologic and clinical outcomes of RARP in RT recipients. The secondary aim was to identify surgical technique modifications required to avoid iatrogenic damage to the transplanted kidney. A total of 18 studies comprising 186 patients met the inclusion criteria. Age at the time of treatment ranged 43-79 years. Biopsy results showed a high prevalence of low- and intermediate-risk disease. Operative time ranged between 108.3 and 400 mins, while estimated blood loss ranged from 30 to 630 mL. Length of hospital stay ranged from 3 to 6 days whereas duration of catheterization was between 5 and 18 days. Perioperative complication rate was 17.1%. Overall positive surgical margin rate was 24.19%, while biochemical recurrence was observed in 10.21% (19/186 patients). Modifications to the standard surgical technique were described in 13/18 studies. Modifications in port placement were described in 7/13 studies and performed in 19/88 (21.6%) patients. Surgical technique for the development of the Retzius space was reported in 13/18 studies. Data on lymphadenectomy were reported in 15/18 studies. Bilateral lymphadenectomy was described in 3/18 studies and performed in 4/89 (4.5%) patients; contralateral lymphadenectomy was reported in 7/18 studies and performed in 41/125 (32.8%) patients. RARP in RTRs can be considered relatively safe and feasible. Oncological results yielded significantly worse outcomes in terms of PSM and BCR rate compared to the data available in the published studies, with an overall complication rate highly variable among the studies included. On the other hand, low graft damage during the procedure was observed. Main criticisms came from different tumor screening protocols and scarce information about lymphadenectomy techniques and outcomes among the included studies.

Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

We compared the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and partial gland ablation (PGA) using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in localized prostate cancer. We analyzed 3,859 patients who had undergone RARP and PGA using HIFU. According to the propensity score for each treatment, 137 patients after PGA were matched to 3,722 patients after RARP at a 1:4 ratio using the nearest neighbor method. The matched cohort comprised 685 subjects (RARP, 548; PGA, 137), with a median follow-up period of 22months. Treatment failures were identified in 13.9% and 9.1% of patients in the PGA and RARP groups, respectively, after a median follow-up of 36months postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed significantly longer failure-free (P<0.001) and salvage-free survival (P=0.003) in the RARP group than in the PGA group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative urinary symptom score (P=0.748), but the postoperative erectile function score was significantly higher in the PGA group (P<0.001). The rate of urinary incontinence (any pad) was significantly lower in the PGA group than that in the RARP group (P<0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the PGA group (P=0.003); however, there was no significant difference in high-grade complications (≥3) (P=0.467). PGA using HIFU showed statistically inferior oncological outcomes compared with RARP for failure-free survival and salvage-free survival. However, functional outcomes regarding postoperative incontinence and erectile dysfunction were more favorable in the PGA group.

Comparative analysis of 10-year functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy. Experience of the Urology Clinic of the A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Background. Prostate cancer is the 3rd most common diagnosis among malignant tumors. The first robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was performed in 2001. Studies comparing RARP and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) are limited. In Russia, the Da Vinci robot was first installed in 2007. At the Urology Clinic of the A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry the program of robot-assisted surgery started in November of 2008.Aim. To perform first in Russia evaluation of 10-year functional treatment outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer after RARP. To perform comparative analysis with RRP outcomes.Materials and methods. Medical histories of 211 patients from the Urology Clinic of the A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry were analyzed. Among them, 62 patients did not satisfy the inclusion criteria. Therefore, the study included 149 patients who underwent surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer between January of 2009 and December of 2011. Depending on the technique of surgical intervention, patients were divided into 2 groups: 1st – RARP (n = 82), 2nd – RRP (n = 67). All RARP were performed by a single surgeon, RRP by 2 experienced surgeons (experience &gt;1000 RRP).Results. Median follow-up was 120 months in both groups. Overall survival in the 1st and 2nd groups was 85.4 and 86.6 %, respectively (p &gt;0.05). For accuracy of functional outcomes analysis, patients who died during follow-up were excluded from the study. Frequency of neurovascular bundle preservation in the 1st and 2nd groups was 60.9 % (50/82) and 40.2 % (27/67), respectively (p = 0.01). Erectile function was preserved in 60.0 and 44.4 % males of the 1st and 2nd groups, respectively (p = 0.01). Age below 60 years (р = 0.009) and disease stage рТ2 (p = 0.026) were predictors of erectile function preservation after RARP. Continence frequency was 92.7 and 82.1 % in the 1st and 2nd groups, respectively (p = 0.048).Conclusion. Ten-year comparative analysis shows that RARP allows to achieve significantly better parameters of urinary continence and erectile function preservation in men with localized prostate cancer than RRP.

Comparative analysis of 10-year oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy. Experience of the Urology Clinic of the A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Background. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the 2nd most common oncological disease among men in the world. The first structured program of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was started in the year 2000. In the medical literature, a limited number of studies on long-term oncological treatment outcomes for patients with PCa after RARP is presented. In Russia, the Da Vinci robot was first installed in 2007. In the Urology Clinic of the A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, the program of robot-assisted surgery was started in November of 2008.Aim. To perform first in Russia evaluation of 10-year oncological treatment outcomes for patients with localized PCa after RARP. To perform comparative analysis with the outcomes of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of medical histories of 211 patients was performed. Among them, 62 patients did not satisfy the inclusion criteria. The remaining 149 patients were divided into 2 groups: 1st - RARP (n = 82), 2nd - RRP (n = 67). All RARP were performed by the same surgeon, RRP by 2 experienced surgeons.Results. Median follow-up was 110.35 ± 24.58 and 115.19 ± 15.37 months in the 1st and 2nd group, respectively; median follow-up was 120 months in both groups (p &gt;0.05). Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meyer approach. Ten-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival was 79.3 and 82.1 %, clinical recurrence-free survival was 96.3 and 97.1 %, metastasis-free survival was 92.7 and 94.0 %, cancer-specific survival was 93.9 and 95.6 % and overall survival was 85.4 and 86.6 % in the 1st and 2nd group, respectively. Mean time to BCR was 17.00 ± 20.67 and 22.83 ± 26.51 months, respectively ( p &gt;0.05). Calculation of BCR predictors was performed using correlation analysis based on contingency test and Cramer's V-test. In the 1st group, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (p = 0.01), prostate-specific antigen level &gt;10 ng/mL (p = 0.04), high progression risk per the D'Amico classification (p = 0.01) were independent preoperative predictors of BCR. Gleason score 7 (4 + 3) (p = 0.04) and ≥8 (p &lt;0.0001) per pathomorphological examination, pT3 stage, extraprostatic extension, invasion into the seminal vesicles and positive surgical margin (all p &lt;0.0001) were independent postoperative predictors of BCR.Conclusion. RARP demonstrates long-term (10-year) oncological effectiveness comparable to oncological effectiveness of RRP in patients with localized PCa.

Functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese men: a matched-pair analysis.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35kg/m2 is considered technically challenging. We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of RARP in men with BMI ≥ 35kg/m2. We interrogated our prospectively maintained RARP database and identified 1273 men who underwent RARP from January 2018 till June 2021. Among them, 43 had BMI ≥ 35kg/m2, and 1230 had BMI < 35kg/m2. A 1:1 genetic matching was performed between these two groups for PSA, Gleason grades, clinical stage, D'Amico risk stratification, and nerve-spare extent. Continence rates and biochemical rates on 1-year follow-up were analysed. We performed statistical analysis using SPSS, and Paired tests were done using Wilcoxon sign rank-sum test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The two groups were comparable in almost all parameters except for age. Console time (p = 0.20) and estimated blood loss (p > 0.90) were not significantly different. There was no blood transfusion, open conversion or (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) intra/postoperative complication in either of the two groups. The two groups did not have any difference in biochemical recurrence rates (BCR) on 1-year follow-up (p > 0.90). Men with BMI ≥ 35 achieved continence rates equivalent to men with BMI < 35 within 1 year. On logistic regression analysis, age (p < 0.001) and extent of nerve sparing (p = 0.026) emerged as significant factors influencing continence recovery. RARP is safe in men with BMI ≥ 35kg/m2. The 1-year continence and oncological outcomes are similar to matched men with BMI < 35kg/m2 undergoing RARP.

Disparities in access to robotic technology and perioperative outcomes among patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Most radical prostatectomies are completed with robotic assistance. While studies have previously evaluated perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), this study investigates disparities in access and clinical outcomes of RARP. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients who received radical prostatectomy for cancer between 2010 and 2017 with outcomes through 2018. RARP was compared to open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Odds of receiving RARP were evaluated while adjusting for covariates. Overall survival was evaluated using a propensity-score matched cohort. Overall, 354 752 patients were included with 297 676 (83.9%) receiving RARP. Patients who were non-Hispanic Black (82.8%) or Hispanic (81.3%) had lower rates of RARP than non-Hispanic White (84.0%) or Asian patients (87.7%, p < 0.001). Medicaid or uninsured patients were less likely to receive RARP (75.5%) compared to patients with Medicare or private insurance (84.4%, p < 0.001). Medicaid or uninsured status was associated with decreased odds of RARP in adjusted multivariable analysis (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.76). RARP was associated with decreased perioperative mortality and improved overall survival compared to ORP. Patients who were underinsured were less likely to receive RARP. Improved access to RARP may lead to decreased disparities in perioperative outcomes for prostate cancer.