Prostate Biopsy Results Research Articles

Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer

PurposePositive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa-specific mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) on reducing the incidence of PSM following RARP.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing RARP at Hiroshima University between February 2017 and October 2023. The MDTM, comprising a radiologist, uropathologist, and urologist, reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate biopsy results of each patient before RARP and considered the areas requiring attention during RARP. Surgeons were categorized as experienced or non-experienced based on the number of RARP procedures performed.ResultsIn the pT2 population, the PSM rate was significantly lower in cases evaluated using the MDTM than in those not (11.1% vs. 24.0%; p = 0.0067). Cox regression analysis identified that a PSA level > 7 ng/mL (hazard ratio 2.2799) and nerve-sparing procedures (hazard ratio 2.2619) were independent predictors of increased PSM risk while conducting an MDTM (hazard ratio 0.4773) was an independent predictor of reduced PSM risk in the pT2 population. In the pathological T3 population, there was no significant difference in PSM rates between cases evaluated and not evaluated at an MDTM. In cases evaluated at an MDTM, similar PSM rates were observed regardless of surgeon experience (10.4% for non-experienced and 11.9% for experienced surgeons; p = 0.9999).ConclusionsAn MDTM can improve the PSM rate of pT2 PCa following RARP.

Consistency between Gleason score of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy: predictors of increased tumour grading

Introduction. Gleason grading is one of the key parameters for determining the prostate cancer (risk group after receiving the results of a prostate biopsy in addition to the level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, an important clinical issue arises from changes in this grading following radical surgery. In some cases, such discrepancies in data can lead to a shift in patient management tactics from radical surgery to active follow-up recommended for patients with low cancer risk.Objective. To assess the consistency of the results of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy with an assessment of possible predictors of increased tumor Gleason grading.Materials & methods. Between 2019 and 2021, 193 patients with prostate cancer were selected for treatment at the Medical Centre of Moscow State University. Of these, 139 patients were chosen for the final analysis of Gleason tumour grading consistency after biopsy and radical prostatectomy.Results. The results of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy were comparable in 54.7% of patients (n = 76), while the remaining 45.3% (n = 63) showed a change in Gleason gradaing after radical prostatectomy: 29.5% (n = 41) patients showed an increased gradation, and 15.8% (n = 22) — decrease. Most often, the data were consistent for patients with a Gleason score 7: 63.6% for 3 + 4 = 7 and 57.9% for 4 + 3 = 7. The highest percentage of graduation increase was observed for patients from the group 3 + 3 = 6 and amounted to 48%. Cohen's kappa value was 0.351 (p < 0.001), indicating poor consistency between the results of the two studies. The total number of biopsies was associated with an increase in Gleason score after radical prostatectomy (OR = 0.816; 95% CI = 0.680 – 0.978). For example, the odds of Gleason tumour grading decreases by 18.4% when the number of biopsy specimens per unit increasesConclusion. The concordance of Gleason grading of prostate cancer after prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy remains poor. The only predictor of improved concordance is the biopsy count, thereby reflecting biopsy quality and encouraging clinicians to move away from sextant biopsies to systematic and targeted biopsies. Increasing the consistency of results can provide more accurate staging and classification of patients according to cancer risk, thereby influencing future management.

Trifecta Outcomes After Use of 3-Dimensional Digital Models for Planning of Robotic Prostatectomy

Planning complex operations such as robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) requires surgeons to review 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to understand 3-dimensional (3D) patient anatomy. Three-dimensional digital models for planning RALP may allow better understanding of patient anatomy and may lead to better patient outcomes, although data are currently limited. To determine surgical outcomes after RALP when surgeons reviewed 3D digital models during operative planning. This study was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter, single-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at 6 large teaching hospitals in the US. The study was conducted between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, and included patients undergoing RALP. Patients were assessed and recruited at the time of surgical consultation. Final data analysis was conducted between August and December 2023. Patients were randomized to either a control group undergoing usual preoperative planning with prostate biopsy results and multiparametric MRI only or to an intervention group in which imaging and biopsy results were supplemented with a 3D digital model. This model was viewed on the surgeon's mobile phone in 3D format and picture-in-picture on the robotic console screen. The primary outcome measure for the overall study was oncologic outcomes after RALP, measured as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) detectability. Secondary outcomes were sexual function and urinary function, measured with Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores and rates of urinary incontinence, respectively, as well as use of salvage or adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Trifecta outcomes were defined as undetectable PSA without RT or ADT, SHIM score categorically the same or greater than preoperatively, and complete continence. Univariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes between groups. This trial included 92 patients undergoing RALP (51 in the control group and 41 in the intervention group). Their mean (SD) age was 62 (7.4) years; 10 patients (10.9%) were Black and 67 (72.8%) were White. At 18 months postsurgery, the intervention group had lower rates of biochemical recurrence (PSA level >0.1 ng/mL, 0 vs 7 [17.9%]; absolute difference, 17.9% [95% CI, 1.8% to 31.8%]; P = .01) and were significantly less likely to undergo adjuvant or salvage RT (1 [3.1%] vs 12 [31.6%]; absolute difference, 28.5% [95% CI, 10.1% to 46.7%]; P = .002) compared with the control group. Sexual function at 18 months postsurgery was significantly better in the intervention group (mean [SD] SHIM score, 16.8 [8.7] vs 9.8 [7.7]; absolute difference, 7.0 [95% CI, 2.6 to 11.4]; P = .002) and urinary function was unchanged (total continence, 22 [78.6%] vs 29 [80.6%]; absolute difference, 2.0% [95% CI, -17.9% to 21.9%]; P = .84) compared with the control group. Trifecta outcomes were achieved for 12 (48.0%) patients in the intervention group and 3 patients (10.0%) in the control group (absolute difference, 38.0% [95% CI, 14.4% to 61.6%]; P = .002). In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients whose surgical planning of RALP involved 3D digital models had better oncologic and functional outcomes. Further work should assess the effect of 3D models in a broader set of patients, physicians, and hospital settings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03943368.

The predictive impact of hematological inflammatory markers in detecting prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

The diagnostic accuracy of suspicious lesions that are classified as PI-RADS 3 in multiparametric prostate magnetic-resonance imaging (mpMRI) is controversial. This study aims to assess the predictive capacity of hematological inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and systemic immune-response index (SIRI) in detecting prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions. 276 patients who underwent mpMRI and subsequent prostate biopsy after PI-RADS 3 lesion detection were included in the study. According to the biopsy results, the patients were distributed to two groups as prostate cancer (PCa) and no cancer (non-PCa). Data concerning age, PSA, prostate volume, PSA density, PI-RADS 3 lesion size, prostate biopsy results, monocyte counts (109/L), lymphocyte counts (109/L), platelet counts (109/L), neutrophils count (109/L) were recorded from the complete blood count. From these data; PIV value is obtained by monocyte × neutrophil × platelet/lymphocyte, NLR by neutrophil/lymphocyte, and SIRI by monocyte number × NLR. Significant variations in neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte levels between PCa and non-PCa patient groups were detected (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, p = 0.005 respectively, p < 0.05). NLR, PIV, and SIRI exhibited significant differences, with higher values in PCa patients (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively, p < 0.05). The area under curve of SIRI was 0.729, with a cut-off value of 1.20 and with a sensitivity 57.70%, and a specificity of 68.70%. SIRI outperformed NLR and PIV in detecting PCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions, showcasing its potential as a valuable biomarker. Implementation of this parameter to possible future nomograms has the potential to individualize and risk-stratify the patients in prostate biopsy decision.

Can 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging Predict Prostate Biopsy Outcome?

ObjectivesTo assess the value of 3D multiparametric ultrasound imaging, combining hemodynamic and tissue stiffness quantifications by machine learning, for the prediction of prostate biopsy outcomes. MethodsAfter signing informed consent, 54 biopsy-naïve patients underwent a 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) recording, a multi-plane 2D shear-wave elastography (SWE) scan with manual sweeping from base to apex of the prostate, and received 12-core systematic biopsies (SBx). 3D maps of 18 hemodynamic parameters were extracted from the 3D DCE-US quantification and a 3D SWE elasticity map was reconstructed based on the multi-plane 2D SWE acquisitions. Subsequently, all the 3D maps were segmented and subdivided into 12 regions corresponding to the SBx locations. Per region, the set of 19 computed parameters was further extended by derivation of eight radiomic features per parameter. Based on this feature set, a multiparametric ultrasound approach was implemented using five different classifiers together with a sequential floating forward selection method and hyperparameter tuning. The classification accuracy with respect to the biopsy reference was assessed by a group-k-fold cross-validation procedure, and the performance was evaluated by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUC). ResultsOf the 54 patients, 20 were found with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) based on SBx. The 18 hemodynamic parameters showed mean AUC values varying from 0.63 to 0.75, and SWE elasticity showed an AUC of 0.66. The multiparametric approach using radiomic features derived from hemodynamic parameters only produced an AUC of 0.81, while the combination of hemodynamic and tissue-stiffness quantifications yielded a significantly improved AUC of 0.85 for csPCa detection (p-value < 0.05) using the Gradient Boosting classifier. ConclusionsOur results suggest 3D multiparametric ultrasound imaging combining hemodynamic and tissue-stiffness features to represent a promising diagnostic tool for biopsy outcome prediction, aiding in csPCa localization.

The Value of Adding Exosome-Based Prostate Intelliscore to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Biopsy: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction: Currently, there is limited evidence for the relationship of Exosome-based Prostate Intelliscore (EPI) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in stratifying risk for clinically significant prostate cancer. Using a retrospective cohort study design, we sought to characterize the relationship between these two noninvasive metrics and prostate biopsy outcome. Methods: Data were collected via electronic medical record for all patients who underwent EPI testing from 1 January 2019 to 3 February 2022 and had available medical records at a single mid-western university medical center. Positive test result was defined as &gt;15.6 for EPI, ≥3 PI-RADS score and ≥3 + 4 Gleason Score for biopsy findings. Utility of EPI, mpMRI and combined use was characterized through calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and ROC analysis. Results: A total of 226 patients were identified as receiving EPI testing for risk stratification of clinically significant prostate cancer. Sensitivity for EPI was 91%, mpMRI was 90%, and the highest was combined use at 96%. With ROC analysis, AUC for EPI alone was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.47–0.67) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70–0.87) for mpMRI alone. With prior positive EPI result, AUC for combined use with mpMRI was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71–0.89). Further subgroup analysis resulted in increased AUC values of EPI 0.67 (95% CI, 0.48–0.87), mpMRI 0.90 (95% CI, 0.76–1.0), and combined 0.90 (95% CI, 0.75–1.0) in the African American population. Discussion: We observed that the combined use of EPI and mpMRI led to an avoided biopsy in 43% of patients. Using both parameters increased the overall sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. The best test performance was observed in the African American cohort. Identifying optimal noninvasive tools to assess risk for prostate cancer is crucial to providing accurate and cost-effective care. Future study should utilize a prospective study design to further support the combined use of these metrics.

Patient Preferences for Benefit and Risk Associated With High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Ablation of Prostate Tissue in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer

IntroductionFood and Drug Administration must make decisions about emerging high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) devices that may lack relevant clinical oncologic data but present with known side effects. This study aims to capture patients’ perspective by quantifying their preferences regarding the available benefit and important side effects associated with HIFU for localized prostate cancer. Materials and methodsPreferences for HIFU outcomes were examined using a discrete choice experiment survey. Participants were asked to choose a preferred treatment option in 9 choice questions. Each included a pair of hypothetical treatment profiles that have similar attributes/outcomes with varying levels. Outcomes included prostate biopsy outcome and treatment-related risks of erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI). We calculated the maximum risk of side effect patients were willing to tolerate in exchange for increased benefit. Preferences were further explored via clinical and demographic data. ResultsAbout 223 subjects with a mean age of 64.8 years completed the survey. Respondents were willing to accept a 1.51%-point increase in new ED risk for a 1%-point increase in favorable biopsy outcome. They were also willing to accept a 0.93%-point increase in new UI risk for a 1%-point increase in biopsy outcome. Subjects who perceived their cancer to be more aggressive had higher risk tolerance for UI. Younger men were willing to tolerate less ED risk than older men. Respondents with greater than college level of education had a lower risk tolerance for ED or UI. ConclusionsResults may inform development and regulatory evaluation for future HIFU ablation devices by providing supplemental information from the patient perspective.

The role of urology and radiology in prostate biopsy: current trends and future perspectives.

Prostate biopsy is central to the accurate histological diagnosis of prostate cancer. In current practice, the biopsy procedure can be performed using a transrectal or transperineal route with different technologies available for targeting of lesions within the prostate. Historically, the biopsy procedure was performed solely by urologists, but with the advent of image-guided techniques, the involvement of radiologists in prostate biopsy has become more common. Herein, we discuss the pros, cons and future considerations regarding their ongoing role. A narrative review regarding the current evidence was completed. PubMed and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were search until January 2024. All study types were of consideration if published after 2000 and an English language translation was available. There are no published studies that directly compare outcomes of prostate biopsy when performed by a urologist or radiologist. In all published studies regarding the learning curve for prostate biopsy, the procedure was performed by urologists. These studies suggest that the learning curve for prostate biopsy is between 10 and 50 cases to reach proficiency in terms of prostate cancer detection and complications. It is recognised that many urologists are poorly able to accurately interpret multi parametric (mp)-MRI of theprostate. Collaboration between the specialities is of importance with urology offering the advantage of being involved in prior and future care of the patient while radiology has the advantage of being able to expertly interpret preprocedure MRI. There is no evidence to suggest that prostate biopsy should be solely performed by a specific specialty. The most important factor remains knowledge of the relevant anatomy and sufficient volume of cases to develop and maintain skills.

MRI-based monitoring of prostate cancer after HIFU: Inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score

PurposeTo investigate inter-reader agreement, and diagnostic performance of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) score applied to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in patients who underwent focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for localized prostate cancer. MethodsIn this retrospective, IRB-approved, single-center study, 73 men, who underwent focal HIFU treatment and received follow-up mpMRIs with subsequent prostate biopsies, were included. The PI-FAB score was applied to follow-up MRIs at 6, 12, and 36 months post-HIFU by two radiologists with different experience levels. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Gwet’s AC1, and the diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score was assessed in relation to histopathologic results of subsequent prostate biopsies for each reader. ResultsPI-FAB scores showed substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement (AC1: 0.80–0.95) and demonstrated high specificity (Reader 1: 90–98 %, Reader 2: 87–98 %) and NPVs (Reader 1: 91–100 %, Reader 2: 88–97 %) in ruling out residual or recurrent in-field prostate cancer post-HIFU. Sensitivity (Reader 1: ≥43 %, Reader 2: ≥14 %) and PPVs (Reader 1: ≥33 %, Reader 2: ≥14 %) were mostly relatively lower, with notable disparities between the two readers, indicating the potential influence of radiologist experience. ConclusionsThe PI-FAB score provides a consistent and reliable tool for post-HIFU monitoring of prostate cancer using mpMRI. It demonstrates substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement and is particularly effective in excluding in-field residual or recurrent prostate cancer post-HIFU treatment. Its application can potentially enhance post-treatment patient care, emphasizing its value as a non-invasive MRI-based monitoring approach after focal ablative therapy of the prostate.

3T multiparametric MRI’s accuracy in detecting prostate cancer using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) version 2.1 with prostate biopsy as a reference

BackgroundMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is valuable in detecting prostate cancer due to its high sensitivity to malignant lesions. It is commonly utilized to improve the identification of clinically significant cancers within the prostate. This study aimed to correlate the findings from 3T multiparametric MRI of the prostate using the updated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PIRADSv2.1) from 2019 with reference to prostate biopsy results. Additionally, PIRADSv2.1 was used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the 3T multiparametric MRI of the prostate.Methods and materialsA retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary center, wherein we identified patients who underwent a prostate biopsy between June 2019 and June 2021 and had a corresponding MRI of the prostate performed at the same institution, evaluated with PIRADSv2.1 criteria.ResultsA total of 50 patients were eligible for final analysis. The prevalence of prostate cancer was 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 54–81%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for 3T multiparametric MRI of the prostate using PIRADSv2.1 to diagnose prostate cancer; the area under the ROC curve was 0.81 (95% CI 0.68–0.95, p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using PIRADSv2.1 were 74.0%, 87.0%, 92.9%, and 59.1%, respectively.ConclusionsPIRADSv2.1 exhibited good overall performance in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

A Case of Primary Adenocarcinoma Mucinous Subtype of the Bladder

A 48-year-old man who presented with asymptomatic gross hematuria in July 202X had been followed up without treatment. In January 202X, he was referred to our department due to the exacerbation of his hematuria. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed bladder cancer suggested bilateral seminal vesicle and prostate invasion, and enlarged right internal and external iliac lymph nodes. The pathological diagnosis was mucinous bladder adenocarcinoma. Prostate biopsy results were negative. Upper and lower gastrointestinal examinations were unremarkable. We suspected bladder cancer cT4aN2M0. In March 202X＋1, the patient underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic total bladder resection, pelvic lymph node dissection, and intracorporeal urinary tract modification (ileal conduit creation). The final diagnosis was primary mucinous adenocarcinoma pT4aN2M0 of the bladder. Given the heightened risk of recurrence, the patient was administered a three-month course of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) as adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy. The patient remains free of progression at 8 months postoperatively. Adenocarcinoma of the bladder is an exceedingly rare entity, with no established chemotherapeutic protocols. Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the bladder is even more exceptional. Presently, only regimens similar to those for colorectal cancer or adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, including 5-fluorouracil, are considered. In our particular case, we elected to pursue XELOX therapy, aligning with the principles governing the management of colorectal cancer.

Московская программа по гистофьюжн биопсии предстательной железы: результаты опроса практикующих урологов на основании данных мультицентрового исследования.

Introduction. Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignant diseases among men. It is necessary to search for new methods of additional visualization. The most promising modern diagnostic method is histoscanning (HS) with the software «True Targeting», which allows you to perform «targeted» prostate biopsy (PB) in real time. We conducted a comparative observational clinical study with anonymous Internet survey implemented based on the SurveyMonkey program. Material and methods. The survey of urology specialists was initiated from the beginning of the «Moscow program for «Histoffusion» biopsies». The survey was composed of 16 questions. Data were obtained and analyzed on the doctor's work experience, experience in performing pancreatic biopsy, hospital, features of the operation, method of choosing anesthesia, patient position and complications in the postoperative period. Results. The division by hospitals showed that transrectal prostate biopsy is performed under the conditions in one day hospital in 80% of cases. Biopsy takes no more than 19 minutes on average. Half of the respondents had experience about 5 years, and only about 15% about 15 years. About 68% of specialists recommend performing MRI with contrast. However, only 22% of patients perform results. About 16% note the impossibility of performing MRI due to contraindications or other difficulties of the healthcare system. The most common complications are hemospermia and hematuria. In 100% of cases, respondents noted the need to prescribe antibiotic therapy. In 64.9% of cases, doctors note the need for a histoscan-guided prostate biopsy, and 82.1% are sure that in the future it is necessary to standardize the method of performing histoscan-guided prostate biopsy. Conclusion. We note the lack of standardization of histoscan-guided prostate biopsy. We suggest that the results of histoscan-guided prostate biopsy can be improved by developing a standardized follow-up as well as an algorithm aimed at optimizing for each patient.

Expect the unexpected: investigating discordant prostate MRI and biopsy results

ObjectivesTo evaluate discrepant radio-pathological outcomes in biopsy-naïve patients undergoing prostate MRI and to provide insights into the underlying causes.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 2780 biopsy-naïve patients undergoing prostate MRI at a tertiary referral centre between October 2015 and June 2022. Exclusion criteria were biopsy not performed, indeterminate MRI findings (PI-RADS 3), and clinically insignificant PCa (Gleason score 3 + 3). Patients with discrepant findings between MRI and biopsy results were categorised into two groups: MRI-negative/Biopsy-positive and MRI-positive/Biopsy-negative (biopsy-positive defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4). An expert uroradiologist reviewed discrepant cases, retrospectively re-assigning PI-RADS scores, identifying any missed MRI targets, and evaluating the quality of MRI scans. Potential explanations for discrepancies included MRI overcalls (including known pitfalls), benign pathology findings, and biopsy targeting errors.ResultsPatients who did not undergo biopsy (n = 1258) or who had indeterminate MRI findings (n = 204), as well as those with clinically insignificant PCa (n = 216), were excluded, with a total of 1102 patients analysed. Of these, 32/1,102 (3%) were classified as MRI-negative/biopsy-positive and 117/1102 (11%) as MRI-positive/biopsy-negative. In the MRI-negative/Biopsy-positive group, 44% of studies were considered non-diagnostic quality. Upon retrospective image review, target lesions were identified in 28% of cases. In the MRI-positive/Biopsy-negative group, 42% of cases were considered to be MRI overcalls, and 32% had an explanatory benign pathological finding, with biopsy targeting errors accounting for 11% of cases.ConclusionProstate MRI demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy, with low occurrences of discrepant findings as defined. Common reasons for MRI-positive/Biopsy-negative cases included explanatory benign findings and MRI overcalls.Clinical relevance statementThis study highlights the importance of optimal prostate MRI image quality and expertise in reducing diagnostic errors, improving patient outcomes, and guiding appropriate management decisions in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.Key Points• Discrepancies between prostate MRI and biopsy results can occur, with higher numbers of MRI-positive/biopsy-negative relative to MRI-negative/biopsy-positive cases.• MRI-positive/biopsy-negative cases were mostly overcalls or explainable by benign biopsy findings.• In about one-third of MRI-negative/biopsy-positive cases, a target lesion was retrospectively identified.

Cumulative cancer locations on prostate biopsy and active surveillance outcomes in the MRI era.

To validate the use of a cumulative cancer locations (CCLO) score, a measurement of tumor volume on biopsy, and to develop a novel magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)-informed CCLO (mCCLO) score to predict clinical outcomes on active surveillance (AS). The CCLO score is a sum of uniquely involved sextants with prostate cancer on diagnostic + confirmatory biopsy. The mCCLO score incorporates MRI findings into the CCLO score. Participants included 1284 individuals enrolled on AS between 1994 and 2022, 343 of whom underwent prostate MRI. The primary outcome was grade reclassification (GR) to grade group ≥2 disease; the secondary outcome was receipt of definitive treatment. Increasing CCLO and mCCLO risk groups were associated with higher risk of GR and undergoing definitive treatment (both p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, increasing mCCLO score was associated with higher risk of GR and receipt of definitive treatment (hazard ratios [HRs] per 1-unit increase: 1.26 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.41] and 1.21 [95% CI: 1.07-1.36], respectively). The model using mCCLO score to predict GR (c-index: 0.671; 95% CI: 0.621-0.721) performed at least as well as models using the number of cores positive for cancer (0.664 [0.613-0.715]; p = 0.7) and the maximum percentage of cancer in a core (0.641 [0.585-0.696]; p = 0.14). The CCLO score is a valid, objective metric to predict GR and receipt of treatment in a large AS cohort. The ability of the MRI-informed mCCLO to predict GR is on par with traditional metrics of tumor volume but is more descriptive and may benefit from greater reproducibility. The mCCLO score can be implemented as a shorthand, informative tool for counseling patients about whether to remain on AS.

High-risk prostate cancer and very high PSA level: results of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in a Cameroonian population

High-risk prostate cancer and very high PSA level: results of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in a Cameroonian population

Prognostic Value of Prostata Specific Antigen and Digital Rectal Examination at Prostate Biopsy

Abstract Prostate cancer is a worldwide health concern with an increasing global incidence. In the Republic of Serbia, it is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in men. The research aims to determine the influence of PSA value and digital rectal examination on the pathohistological findings of prostate biopsy in men in Central Serbia. The study was designed as a retrospective, cross-sectional analytical study conducted in the period from December 2021 to December 2022 after receiving the confirmation of the Ethics Committee of the University of Applied Sciences Kragujevac. Among 151 respondents aged 49 to 88 who underwent consecutive biopsies during the study period, prostate cancer was detected in 65 (42%). Out of 65 positive biopsies, 33 subjects had a Gleason score of up to 7, while 32 subjects had a Gleason score over 7. Prostate biopsies significantly correlated with PSA levels (p=0.02), while DRE and prostate volume did not show statistical significance on the prostate biopsy result. PSA level testing leads to early detection of prostate disease in the elderly. PSA value was the only clinical variable associated with an increased rate of prostate cancer in men ≥ 70 and older (p=0.02). DRE, PSA, and prostate volume are important parameters associated with an increase in prostate cancer detection rate in men over 70 years of age.

Additional Parameters to the Briganti Nomogram for Predicting Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Prostate Cancer.

Despite advanced medical technology, accurately predicting pelvic lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) remains a challenge. Various nomograms were utilised to enhance the accuracy of this prediction. Our goal was to determine if preoperative inflammation markers and transrectal prostate biopsy data offer extra insight into predicting pathological LN involvement in radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic LN dissection (RP + ePLND). This study included patients with PCa who had a Briganti score of 5 or higher and were treated with RP + ePLND between January 2016 and May 2023. Physical examination findings, blood work within 1 month before biopsy and prostate biopsy results were recorded retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of pelvic LN metastasis (group 1 and group 2, respectively). The preoperative data of both groups were compared for analysis. The study involved 71 patients; 17 were in group 1, and 54 were in group 2. We observed significant differences between the groups in terms of bilateral tumour involvement in prostate, presence of perineural and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in biopsy specimens, D'Amico risk group, as well as haematological and biochemical parameters such as the absolute counts of lymphocyte and monocyte, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the levels of total and free prostate-specific antigen. Logistic regression analysis revealed that absolute lymphocyte count, presence of LVI and bilateral tumour involvement were independent predictors of pathological pelvic LN metastasis in PCa. The cut-off value of lymphocyte count for predicting LN metastasis was 1.57 (103/mL) with a sensitivity of 0.870 and a specificity of 0.412 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.675, p = 0.030). According to our findings, LVI in biopsy specimens, bilateral lobe tumours and preoperative lymphocyte count are significant predictors of pelvic LN metastasis in patients with PCa and a Briganti score of ≥5.

Comparison in Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Between Microultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy (ExactVu) and Multiparametric Resonance Imaging-guided Prostate Biopsy (Koelis System)

ObjectivesTo compare the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) and prostate cancer and to find out the diagnostic concordance between microultrasound (mUS), a high-resolution imaging system that can identify suspicious prostate lesions and biopsy them in real time, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided prostate fusion biopsies. MethodsA prospective, multicentre, single-blind, single cohort study was conducted involving 80 patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer who underwent concomitant mpMRI-guided fusion prostate biopsy (KoelisTM System) and microultrasound-guided biopsy (ExactVuTM System) Results:The detection rate of csPC was slightly higher for image-guided fusion biopsy (21.25% vs. 18.75%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.453). There was also no significant difference in overall PC diagnosis (50% vs. 51.25%, p = 0.897). The degree of agreement between the two diagnostic techniques for the detection of csPC as assessed by Cohen's Kappa concordance index was satisfactory κ ̂ = 0.676. The degree of ISUP of targeted biopsies obtained from concordant lesions was also represented by satisfactory concordance with a Kappa index of κ ̂ = 0. 696. ConclusionsMicroultrasound-guided biopsy is presented as an effective diagnostic method for the diagnosis of csPC compared to image-guided fusion biopsy. No differences are found in the detection rates of csPC and PC between the two strategies and satisfactory concordance is found in terms of histopathological findings.

STUDY OF THE TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY IN KANAZAWA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, SUMMARY OF 20 YEARS

(Background) Prostate biopsy is the most important examination for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and the most common test in urology. We evaluated the results of transrectal prostate biopsy performed at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital. (Materials and Methods) Prospectively collected cases of 1,935 patients was undergone transrectal prostate biopsy between January 2002 and December 2021. We looked at patients age, serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD), total prostate volume, number of biopsy times, and number of biopsy core. We examined the positive cancer rate. (Results) The median age of patients was 70 years (range: 36-96 years), the median serum PSA level was 7.6 ng/mL (range: 0.19-15,823 ng/mL), the mean number of biopsy times was 1.3 (range: 1-6), and the mean number of total biopsy core was 8.6 (range: 2-14). There were 880 (45.5%) positive cases and 1,055 (54.5%) negative cases. Comparing the cancer-positive and cancer-negative groups, the median age was 72 years (range: 50-96 years), 68 years (range: 36-93 years), the median PSA level was 11.0 ng/mL (range: 0.19-15,823 ng/mL), 6.6 ng/mL (range: 0.24-86.0 ng/mL), median prostate volume was 29.5 mL (range: 7.4-206 mL), 39.1 mL (range: 9.6-178 mL), median PSAD 0.376 (range: 0.003-1,582), 0.177 (range: 0.016-7.513), mean number of biopsy times 1.2 (range: 1-6), 1.4 (range: 1-6), mean number of total biopsy core 8.9 (range: 2-14), 8.5 (range: 4-14), and there was a significant difference in all comparison.

B-376 Performance of Pathological Anatomy Immunohistochemical Markers and Serum Tumor Markers in Prostate Cancer

Abstract Background The gold standard method for diagnosing prostate cancer is systematic prostate biopsy under ultrasound guidance and local anesthesia.Serum tumor marker tests (PSA, Free PSA and testosterone) and confirmatory or classificatory immunohistochemical (IHC) complement the conclusion of the patient’s report. The maximum amount of information regarding the pathological anatomy and markers provided to physicians favors assertive decision-making in the conduct of treatment. However, the results of prostate biopsies after treatment with prostatectomy can differ significantly in the course of the disease. In this context, the authors’ objectives were to analyze the performance of the dosages of these widely used serum markers against the IHC markers of biopsies, as well as their indicators of positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) for prostatic neoplasms. The authors analyzed the level of agreement between pathological prostate biopsy results and immunohistochemical (IHC) testing for 34ßE12, p63, and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) to provide final pathological results for prostate cancer, as well as their relationship with data provided by biochemical tests for the markers PSA, Free PSA and Testosterone. Methods Descriptive, retrospective study with a qualitative and quantitative approach, based on data obtained through IHC exams and available in a database of a large laboratory in São Paulo—Brazil. Data collection was based on anatomopathological results of male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, aged between 40 and 69 years between August 2021 and December 2022 with a total of 1403 analyzes for biopsies using IHC combined markers such as 34ßE12 , p63 and AMACR, and a total of 144 analyzes for combined prostatic serum markers (total PSA, free PSA and testosterone). All analyzes were conducted using the R software version 4.1.0 (R CORE TEAM, 2021) and considered a significance level (α) of 5%. Results The Mann-Whitney test indicated that the distribution of the PSA variable (ng/dL) does not differ statistically between the 34ßE12 groups (W = 822.0; P = 0.224; r = 0.139 , p63 (W = 826.0; P = 0.361 ; r = 0.103), and AMACR (W = 610.0; P = 0.351; r = -0.106). Likewise, the Free PSA marker (ng/dL) did not differ statistically between 34ßE12 (W = 309.5; P = 0.473 ; r = -0.097), p63 (W = 319.5; P = 0.488; r = - 0.093 and AMACR (W = 372.0; P = 0.725; r = 0.048). The results of the ROC curve with PSA (ng/dL) as predictor of the biopsy result with the marker 34ßE12, p63 and AMACR the mean positive predictive values (MPVP) were 0.623 , 0.635 and 0.615 respectively. For Free PSA (ng/dL) with the markers respectively, the VPPM were 0.743, 0.750 and 0.455. As for testosterone, our sample was very small. Conclusion Our findings showed that all markers are important indicators for the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer and that they complement each other. Free PSA showed good PPV for 34ßE12 and p63 markers and low PPV for AMACR.