Results Of Hemiarthroplasty Research Articles

Effect of cemented vs uncemented on outcomes for hemiarthroplasty in the elderly: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

In patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty in the elderly, the choice of the cemented method remains controversial. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the impact of cemented vs uncemented on outcomes for hemiarthroplasty in the elderly. This study included randomized controlled trials comparing the postoperative effects of cemented vs uncemented in patients with hemiarthroplasty. With no language restrictions, we searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Collaboration), Clinical Trials.gov, the ISRCTN registry, as well as gray literature with no language restrictions from January 1966 to April 2023. Data were quantitatively summarized using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. This study included 13 randomized controlled trials with 3485 patients. The primary outcomes of the meta-analysis showed that cemented fixation in elderly patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty was superior to noncemented in 1-year mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77, 0.97). Moreover, cemented was associated with a reduced risk of intraoperative periprosthetic fracture (RR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.50), postoperative periprosthetic fracture (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16,0.72), and loosening (RR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.97). Cemented hemiarthroplasty is superior to noncemented in terms of survival. Moreover, cementation reduces the incidence of some implant-related complications. More extensive trials are needed to provide adequate guidance for choosing the proper cemented method.

Impact of Dementia on Outcomes Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: A National Database Study

BackgroundDementia poses an elevated risk of femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the elderly, often leading to the need for hemiarthroplasty. Yet, the outcomes of hemiarthroplasty in patients who have dementia remain uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess whether dementia serves as a potential risk factor for outcomes following hemiarthroplasty. MethodsDementia patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for FNF with at least 1 year of follow-up were identified using a national insurance database. A 1:1 matched control cohort of patients who do not have dementia was created for comparison. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the rates of complications between the two cohorts. A total of 89,072 patients, of whom half have dementia and half do not, undergoing hemiarthroplasty for FNF were identified. ResultsAside from increased risks of medical complications (P < 0.01), including pneumonia, cerebrovascular accident, acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, and sepsis, within 90 days, dementia patients also demonstrated higher rates of surgical complications within 1 year, such as dislocation (odds ratio (OR) 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71 to 2.04), periprosthetic fractures (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.45), and revision (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.36). On the other hand, dementia patients displayed slightly reduced rates of 90-day deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. However, no significant increase was found in transfusion, myocardial infarction, wound complications, periprosthetic joint infection, or aseptic loosening between the two cohorts. Additionally, patients who have dementia demonstrated a higher likelihood of 90-day emergency department visits, whereas rates of 90-day hospital readmission remained similar. ConclusionsAlthough dementia patients do not exhibit an elevated risk of periprosthetic joint infection, or aseptic loosening, they are more prone to experiencing higher risks of prosthetic dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and revision. Furthermore, specific medical complications tend to be more prevalent among individuals who have dementia.

Hemiarthroplasty for irreparable distal radius fractures in the elderly: A comprehensive review.

Elderly patients maintaining functional independence can now be candidates for primary wrist hemiarthroplasty to manage acute irreparable distal radius fractures (DRFs). However, further investigation with long-term follow-up is required to validate these initial findings. To review the literature on the outcomes of distal radius hemiarthroplasty with available implants to assess its viability as a treatment option. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, and Scopus. The search terms employed were "distal radius fracture" , "hemiarthroplasty" , "wrist arthroplasty" , and related terminology. The search was restricted to articles published in English from 1980 until June 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed cases or case series of DRF treated with hemiarthroplasty, providing clinical or radiographic outcomes, and published in peer-reviewed journals. A total of 2508 articles from PubMed and 883 from Scopus were identified initially. Following screening and removal of duplicates, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles, predominantly clinical retrospective studies, provided insights into hemiarthroplasty outcomes, including functional improvements and complications. Hemiarthroplasty was a treatment option for complex DRF, particularly those cases with severe comminution, intraarticular involvement, or severe osteoporosis. Functional outcomes demonstrated improvements in pain relief, wrist mobility, and grip strength, with variability across studies. Complications included implant loosening, infection, nerve injury, and stiffness, with varying incidence rates influenced by surgical techniques and implant choice. Long-term outcomes were inadequately documented, warranting further research. Hemiarthroplasty is a promising treatment for irreparable DRF in the elderly. Long-term outcomes and complications require further study.

Long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and rotator cuff reconstruction in patients with cuff tear arthropathy

Long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and rotator cuff reconstruction in patients with cuff tear arthropathy

Intermediate-Term Follow-Up of Biopro® Modular Thumb Implant for Carpometacarpal Arthritis

Purpose: Basilar thumb arthritis is a common condition that can be associated with significant disability. While surgical management has historically consisted of trapeziectomy-type procedures, hemiarthroplasty has become an increasingly common alternative. While outcomes have been promising, they vary according to the implant used. We sought to evaluate the performance of the BioPro® Modular Thumb implant. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 110 thumbs with carpometacarpal arthritis that underwent hemiarthroplasty between the years 2008 and 2016 with the BioPro® device. All thumbs had Eaton-Little Stage II or III arthritis. Patients were asked to complete preoperative and postoperative assessments using QuickDASH, as well as complete strength measurements using a dynamometer. Results: Mean age was 61 years, with average final follow-up at 3.8 years. Forty thumbs completed QuickDASH and showed a 34.78-point improvement at average 2-year follow-up. Implant survivorship was 88.18% at average 3.8-year follow-up. The most common cause of revision was titanium metal allergy. No implants dislocated. Conclusion: Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty using the BioPro® device were comparable or superior to alternatives and support its continued use.

Long-term outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus

Hallux rigidus (HR) is arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.First metatarsophalangeal joint hemiarthroplasty surgery is one of the treatment options for end stage hallux rigidus.The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty of the first MTPJ with a metallic implant in patients with end-stage HR. Patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty surgery with the diagnosis of HR were included in the study. Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) and Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) scores were used in pre-operative and post-operative final follow-ups to evaluate the clinical status of the patients. Post-operative 1st metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion was measured and recorded separately for each patient. The intra-hospital and follow-up complications and revision surgeries of the patients were recorded. Thirty-five patients with a mean follow-up of 8.1 years were included in the study. There was a statistically significant positive change in both FADI and SAFE-Q scores compared to the pre-operative process(p = 0.0001). The average dorsiflexion angle at the final follow-up was 22.0 ± 8.2. Thus, it was determined that the 5-year and 8-year survival rates of patients in this study were 97.1% and 87.8%, respectively. In conclusion, the long-term results show that the use of hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of end-stage HR leads to high patient satisfaction, increased range of motion and a high survival rate.

Clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is a treatment option for complex proximal humerus fractures not suitable for conservative treatment or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Long-term outcomes using a large metaphyseal volume prosthesis in the management of fractures of the proximal humerus have not been reported thus far. Between 2006 and 2010, 41 patients with a proximal humerus fracture were treated with HA (average age: 62 years: range, 38-85) at our institution. Nine patients underwent revision surgery, three patients were lost to follow-up and seven died unrelated to the index surgery. Twenty-two patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean period of 10.4 years (range, 9-13 years). Seven out of nine failures of HA occurred within the first 2 postoperative years: 2 infections and 5 greater tuberosity non-/mal-unions. The other two patients underwent revision for rotator cuff deficiency more than 5 years after initial surgery. Of those patients available for final follow-up, the implant survival rate was 71% (22 out of 31 patients). Their mean relative Constant score was 76 % (range, 49-96), the mean active elevation was 116° (range, 60-170) and the mean external rotation was 28° (range, 0-55), at the final follow-up. The majority had a good/excellent internal rotation, with 13 patients (59%) to the 12th thoracic vertebra and 7 patients (31%) to the 8th thoracic vertebra. The mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 76% (range, 40-100). Clinical outcomes did not significantly deteriorate over a period of 10 years, except for flexion (p<0.001) and internal rotation (p=0.002). Analyzing greater tuberosity healing, one patient had a non-union, 10 (45%) had a mal-union, and in 12 patients (55%) the greater tuberosity healed in an anatomical position. Patients with a displaced mal-union of the greater tuberosity did not have inferior clinical results at last follow-up. Only two patients showed glenoid erosion and in no patient stem loosening could be identified at the final follow-up. The revision rate following large metaphyseal volume HA to treat a proximal humerus fracture was 29% after 10 years postoperatively, with failure within 2 years largely related to greater tuberosity non-/mal-union and later related to rotator cuff insufficiency. Patients with a retained implant showed good clinical and radiographic long-term results, without relevant deterioration over time even when the greater tuberosity healed in a non-anatomical position.

Proximal humerus fractures: A review of current practice

The management of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) remains controversial. Its incidence is increasing. Patients should be meticulously assessed clinically for co-morbidities and neuro-vascular injuries. Radiological investigation helps provide information on the fracture configuration and dislocations. Enhanced by 3-dimensional CT scanning, these further help in decision making and operative planning. PHF classifications have been demonstrated to have poor intra-observer and inter-observer reliability. Research has identified some radiographic predictive factors for humeral head ischaemia and likely failure of surgical fixation. The range of management options include non-operative treatment, operative fixation, intramedullary nailing and arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty, reverse shoulder replacement).The majority of PHFs are stable injuries and non-operative management is usually successful. Some degree of malunion is readily tolerated especially by elderly patients. Surgical management of significantly displaced, unstable proximal humerus fractures should aim to stabilise the fracture adequately and provide satisfactory function for the long term. Management of the greater tuberosity is pivotal for the eventual outcome. When fixation may appear to be compromised by poor bone quality, likely poor function, age related rotator cuff degeneration or likely humeral head ischaemia clinicians may opt for arthroplasty. Successful hemiarthroplasty outcomes are dependent on sufficient healing of the tuberosity and recovery of the rotator cuff integrity. Reverse shoulder replacement can predictably deliver good functional outcomes for the shoulder in elderly patients, where rotator cuff dysfunction is suspected or as a revision procedure following failure of other surgical interventions. As opposed to hemiarthroplasty, which has shown a downward trend, there has been an increasing trend towards the use of reverse shoulder replacement in proximal humeral fractures. The management of PHFs should be patient specific, fracture specific and meet the functional demands and needs of the individual patient. The surgeon's skill set and clinical experience also plays an important role in the options of management available.

Outcomes Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Who Have Hemiparesis

BackgroundHemiparesis increases the risk of femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the elderly, which frequently necessitates hemiarthroplasty. There are limited reports on the outcomes of hemiarthroplasty in patients who have hemiparesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hemiparesis as a potential risk factor for medical and surgical complications following hemiarthroplasty. MethodsHemiparetic patients who have concomitant FNF and underwent hemiarthroplasty with at least 2 years of follow-up were identified using a national insurance database. A 10:1 matched control cohort of patients who did not have hemiparesis was created for comparison. There were 1,340 patients who have and 12,988 patients who did not have hemiparesis undergoing hemiarthroplasty for FNF. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate rates of medical and surgical complications between the 2 cohorts. ResultsAside from increased rates of medical complications including cerebrovascular accident (P < .001), urinary tract infection (P = .020), sepsis (P = .002), and myocardial infarction (P < .001), patients who have hemiparesis also experienced higher rates of dislocation within 1 and 2 years (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.54, P = .009; OR 1.52, P = .010). Hemiparesis was not associated with higher risk of wound complications, periprosthetic joint infection, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture, but was associated with higher incidence of 90-day ED-visits (OR 1.16, P = .031) and 90-day readmission (OR 1.32, P < .001). ConclusionWhile patients who have hemiparesis do not have increased risk of implant-related complications other than dislocation, they are at increased risk of developing medical complications following hemiarthroplasty for FNF.

Influence of Race on Utilization and Outcomes in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background: Studies have shown that utilization and outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty vary by sociodemographic factors, highlighting disparities in care. This systematic review synthesized all available literature regarding the relationship between utilization and outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty and race/ethnicity. Methods: Studies were identified using PubMed, MEDLINE (through Ovid), and CINAHL databases. All English language studies of Level I through IV evidence that specifically evaluated utilization and/or outcomes of hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, or reverse shoulder arthroplasty by race and/or ethnicity were included. Outcomes of interest included rates of utilization, readmission, reoperation, revision, and complications. Results: Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Since the 1990s, Black and Hispanic patients have demonstrated a lower utilization rate of shoulder arthroplasty compared with White patients. Although utilization has increased among all racial groups throughout the present decade, the rate of increase is greater for White patients. These differences persist in both low-volume and high-volume centers and are independent of insurance status. Compared with White patients, Black patients have a longer postoperative length of stay after shoulder arthroplasty, worse preoperative and postoperative range of motion, a higher likelihood of 90-day emergency department visits, and a higher rate of postoperative complications including venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, and sepsis. Patient-reported outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's score, did not differ between Black and White patients. Hispanics had a significantly lower revision risk compared with White patients. One-year mortality did not differ significantly between Asians, Black patients, White patients, and Hispanics. Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty utilization and outcomes vary by race and ethnicity. These differences may be partly due to patient factors such as cultural beliefs, preoperative pathology, and access to care, as well as provider factors such as cultural competence and knowledge of health care disparities. Level of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hemiarthroplasty for Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundGeriatric intertrochanteric fractures remain a major public health concern due to the considerable disability, morbidity, mortality, and health care costs associated with these injuries. The underlying poor bone quality and unstable nature of these fractures makes them difficult to treat. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures when compared to the traditional treatment options of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). MethodsA retrospective 1:1 matched cohort of 150 patients who had intertrochanteric fractures treated with either hemiarthroplasty or ORIF was developed using a local institutional database. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative variables were collected with at least 1 year of patient follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed with use of Student’s t-tests, chi-square tests, and analysis of variance. ResultsUnstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with ORIF were associated with significantly more blood loss and an increased need for revision surgery. This effect was most pronounced in Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification type 31.A3 fractures, as patients treated with ORIF experienced significantly slower postoperative mobilization, increased blood loss, increased readmission, and revision surgery rates. Hemiarthroplasty was associated with an increased risk of greater trochanter escape, which did not appear to effect outcomes in this subset of patients. ConclusionHemiarthroplasty may improve outcomes for patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The benefit of this technique is likely maximized in Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 31.A3 fractures. It remains a good option in the hands of experienced surgeons.

Functional Outcome of Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Study.

Introduction It is frequently challenging to treat an unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly people by internal fixation because of difficult anatomical reduction, poor bone quality, the need for prolonged bed rest and restricted ambulation. As an alternative to internal fixation, cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty has been used as a treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures to avoid the postoperative immobilization-related complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Methodology A prospective study was conducted that included 30 patients who were admitted to the apex trauma center at a tertiary care centerfrom January 2019 to August 2020 with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (Association for Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association, or AO/OTA, types 31-A2.2 and 31-A2.3); patients treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty, with at least one year of follow-up were included in the study. Basic descriptive statistics were used and the results were presented in frequencies, percentages for categorical variables and means and standard deviations for continuous variables. Results According to the Harris Hip Score, at the end of 12 months, 9 patients (30%) had excellent results, 14 patients (46.67%) had good results, 5 patients (16.67) had fair results, and 2 cases (6.67) had poor results. With cemented hemiarthroplasty, 87.7% of older patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were able to walk sooner, and the results were good. Conclusion Hemiarthroplasty of the hip with a cemented bipolar prosthesis appears to be a reliable treatment method for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis; it allows for early ambulation and leads to a favorable functional outcome in most patients following surgery.

Impact of prior anterior instability on shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review

Anterior shoulder instability (ASI) is a frequently encountered pathology. Patients with a history of ASI have an increased rate of developing glenohumeral osteoarthritis and becoming candidates for shoulder arthroplasty. This systematic review aims to synthesize outcomes for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with a history of ASI. A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating the impact of prior ASI on total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse TSA, and/or hemiarthroplasty outcomes, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Studies were graded by level of evidence and data concerning patient demographics and outcomes were extracted. Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria, including 596 patients (413 male, 181 female). The average age of the control and prior ASI groups were 57.5 and 57.0 years, respectively. Overall, 251 patients were treated operatively, 132 nonoperatively, and 213 were controls without a history of prior ASI. Shoulder arthroplasty techniques included TSA (436 shoulders), reverse TSA (130 shoulders), and hemiarthroplasty (14 shoulders). Prior anterior stabilization management included soft tissue repair, bony augmentation, and nonoperative treatment. Almost all studies reported no significant difference in subjective and functional arthroplasty outcomes between control and prior ASI groups, or between patients with prior ASI treated nonoperatively vs. surgically. Shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of prior ASI results in improved subjective and functional outcome scores that are comparable to patients without a history of instability.

Does reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composite (APC) have surgical benefits over hemiarthroplasty with APC in patients with tumors of the proximal humerus?

The research on surgical outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using allograft-prosthesis composites for the proximal humeral oncologic condition is still scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of shoulder joint reconstruction with hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using allograft-prosthesis composites for tumors of the proximal humerus. Eleven patients underwent hemiarthroplasty or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using allograft-prosthesis composites for tumors of the proximal humerus between July 2011 and April 2018 were reviewed. Radiographic analysis for bone union of allograft-host bone junction, implant loosening, stress shielding and shoulder dislocation or subluxation was performed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scales for pain, range of motion, Simple Shoulder Test score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. Furthermore, oncologic outcome and complications were also assessed, respectively. There were five patients with hemiarthroplasty (mean age, 23.2years) and six patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (mean age, 46.8years, P=0.05). Radiographically, there were no events associated with implant loosening, stress shielding and shoulder dislocation or subluxation in the two groups. There were no differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. There was no local recurrence in entire cohort. In the hemiarthroplasty group, one patient was required revision surgery to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at postoperative 6years due to rotator cuff dysfunction. In the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty group, one patient showed the fracture occurred at allograft-host bone junction at postoperative 6months. Surgical outcomes of hemiarthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composites were not inferior to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty when applied in properly selected patients. The authors recommended that hemiarthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composites could be used for young age patients without glenoid metastasis involvement, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with allograft-prosthesis composites could be used for patients with old age or metastatic bone tumors.

Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty and concentric glenoid reaming: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the ream and run technique

BackgroundAnatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is the gold standard surgical treatment for glenohumeral arthritis. Concerns for this procedure are glenoid bone loss and glenoid component wear, particularly in young and active individuals. The ream and run procedure using hemiarthroplasty and concentric glenoid reaming without placing a glenoid component has been proposed as an alternative. Only a few studies have assessed its outcomes and complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to better quantify the ream and run’s outcomes and revision rates. MethodsA systematic review on the outcomes of the ream and run procedure was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Descriptive statistics and pooled values were synthesized from the included studies to determine patient demographics, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures, and revision rates. Values were compared with the minimum clinically important difference. ResultsFrom 82 initial search results, 5 studies (3 level III and 2 level IV) met our selection criteria. These included 470 shoulders from 468 patients with an average age of 56.7 years (range: 22-81 years) and average follow-up of 4.7 years (range: 0.7 – 16.0 years). Improvement in the Simple Shoulder Test (2 studies), Visual Analog Scale (2 studies), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (4 studies) were 5.4, 4.5, and 43, respectively. This was greater than the minimum clinically important difference for each of these measures (2.4, 1.4, and 20.9, respectively). The mean postoperative forward elevation achieved was 143.5°, and external rotation was 44.0°. At the mean follow-up of 4.7 years, the revision rate was 7.6%, including 4.0% that underwent conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty. DiscussionThe ream and run technique to surgically treat glenohumeral arthritis leads to improvement of functional outcomes above the thresholds that predict patient satisfaction. These midterm results are similar to those achieved by anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty over the same follow-up period, but not enough long-term data exist to compare long-term survivorship. Outcomes across the same time frame are also very similar to those of traditional hemiarthroplasty. The ream and run remains an option for functional improvement and pain control in the short-term to midterm follow-up period.

Early Functional Outcome of Hemiarthroplasty in the Elderly with Neck of Femur Fracture: A Single Centre's Experience.

Introduction:Neck of femur fractures in the elderly population are common and often a devastating condition. The optimal treatment has been a subject of debate. Arthroplasty has been shown to be the most viable treatment option. The high cost of total hip replacement makes hemiarthroplasty a suitable option in our environment.Materials and Methods:This study was designed to measure the outcome of hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture using Harris hip score in patients aged 60 and above at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dala, Kano, Nigeria.Results:Twenty-five consecutive patients 60 years and above with femoral neck fracture who met the inclusion criteria and gave consent were enrolled into the study. The mean Harris hip score at the pre-operative period was 16.92. Fourth week after the surgery, the mean Harris hip score was 69.96. The score rose further to 75.24 and 80.96 at 12 weeks and 6 months post-operatively. The difference between the mean pre-operative and post-operative scores at 4th week, 12th week, and 6th month was statistically significant. During the pre-operative period, all patients had a poor Harris hip score grade. Six months after the surgery, 7 patients (28%) had an excellent Harris hip score grade, 12 patients (48%) had good grades, and 1 patient (4%) had a fair Harris hip score grade. Five patients (20%) had a poor Harris hip score grade at 6 months.Conclusion:From the findings of this study, it can be concluded that early functional outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in the elderly are good and satisfactory.

Have advances in surgical implants and techniques in hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures improved patient outcomes compared to THA? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence

IntroductionHip fractures are common orthopaedic hospital admissions and result in considerable morbidity and mortality in the patients affected. The aim of this study is to review how advances in surgical implants and techniques have impacted on outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty (HA) vs Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was performed and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews & Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included all studies that were prospective randomised controlled trials comparing the outcomes THA versus HA in patients with displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures. Results13 randomised controlled trial met the eligibility criteria; the overall pooled sample size was 3050 patients. The evidence suggests that the short-term functional outcomes favour THA, without strong evidence of a clinically significant benefit. More recent larger RCTs suggest limited functional improvement conferred by THA vs. HA, whilst the risks of complications may outweigh these small gains. Overall, THA is associated with higher dislocation rates without a significant need for re-operation, but no increase in infection or need for transfusion over HA. Consultant or equivalent supervision has a positive effect on outcomes in both groups. ConclusionThe literature supports a change in direction, this meta-analysis confirms HA surgery has equivalent clinical outcomes and possibly a lower mortality in octogenarians and provides further evidence for the stratification of THA treatment in displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures is urgently required. Level of evidence1.

Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty via lateral approach in elderly patients

Background: Hip fractures are common and comprise 20% of operative workload of an orthopaedic trauma unit [1]. Hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture is one of the commonest procedures undertaken in Orthopaedics. A number of different surgical approaches may be used for the operation including the anterior, antero-lateral, lateral and posterior approach. Currently the two most commonly used approaches for hemiarthroplasty of the hip are the lateral [7] and the posterior approach [8]. Methods: Patients >60years with displaced neck of femur facture without distal neurovascular deficit presenting and giving written and informed consent were evaluated clinically and radiologically. Total 42 patients underwent surgery with lateral approach. No mortality was observed among the cases. Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was used to compare outcomes. Data was collected in the standard pro forma and patients were followed up at 2, 6 and 12 weeks.Results: Modified Harris Hip Score at 12 weeks was 66.90±9.41 in Lateral approach. The mHHS has increased with successive follow up which was statistically significant. At 12 weeks according mHHS, 4.8% has excellent result, 7.1% had good result, 21.4% had fair result and 66.7% had relatively poor result. The quality of life of the patient has been improving in subsequent follow up and it was statistically significant.Conclusion: Hemiarthroplasty via Lateral approach in elderly patients is safe and effective as operative outcome of the patient significantly increases with time. Post-operative pain, blood loss, prosthesis dislocation and other surgery related complications were minimum and the approach was more suitable for the patient.

Functional outcome of hemiarthroplasty vs internal fixation for femoral neck fracture in elderly population: A comparative prospective study

Introduction: Femoral neck fractures are one among the leading causes of death in elderly patients. Magnitude of fracture displacement, patient's age, comorbid disorders, and prefracture activity level are some of the critical factors in determining the clinical practice for treating femoral neck fracture. In this study, we have studied the functional outcome and survivorship in fracture neck of femur in the elderly population operated with both internal fixation (IF) and cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA). Material and Method: All 100 patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically at 15 days, 1 month, and then subsequent 1 year. Out of 100 patients, 54 have been operated with HA and 46 have been operated with screw fixation. Results: Overall reoperation rate in HA group was 5.05%, with total mortality rate being 7.4% compared to 6.5% of IF group. Out of 46 patients of screw fixation, the overall reoperation rate was 20% with 4 patients being developed avascular necrosis and 13 being developed nonunion, and rest of the patients have average Harris hip score of 60–65 with 34%, while patients having poor Harris hip score compared to those of HA with Harris hip score of 80–90 with 88.2% having excellent to fair. Conclusion: Hip arthroplasty as compared to Internal fixation for the treatment of femoral neck fractures significantly reduces the risk of reoperation at the cost of higher superficial infection and blood loss. Furthermore, postoperative function as evaluated by the Harris hip score was significantly higher in the arthroplasty compared to the IF group up to the 6-month evaluation.

Outcomes of shoulder hemiarthroplasty in non-salvageable proximal humerus fracture: A prospective study

Background: Proximal humerus fractures are 5% of all fractures and 80% of all humerus fractures in elderly. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for comminuted Neer”s 3 or 4 part fractures, head split fractures or fracture with significant underlying arthritic changes. The aim of the study is to analyse clinical, radiological and functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty in non-salvageable proximal humerus fracture.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out in 20 cases of non-salvageable proximal humerus fracture aged above 50 years irrespective of sex. Standard Modular cemented prosthesis were used in all 20 patients. The study was conducted for a period of 15 months and cases were followed up for a period of 6 months.Results: The average age of patient was 62 years with 12 female and 8 were male. Anterior Deltopectoral approach was used as the standard approach for hemiarthroplasty. Modular Hemiarthroplasty prosthesis was inserted with cement. 13 of the 20 patients has shown good results. The range of movement in all 17 patients are satisfactory except for 3 who had poor results but had satisfactory relief of pain. In 3 patients the greater tuberocity failed to unite.Conclusion: Outcome of Hemiarthroplasty is quite satisfactory in elderly if done for fresh traumatic non salvageable proximal humerus fracture without involvement of glenoid and without any unrepairable major rotator cuff injury. Hemiarthroplasty if done within 2 weeks gives better results as there will be less adhesion of soft tissue thus soft tissue repair and their reattachment can be done meticulously. Hemiarthroplasty shoulder done for non-salvageable proximal humerus fractures will provide better stability, early mobilization, lesser stiffness and satisfactory range of motion (ROM) in elderly.