Results Of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Research Articles

Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair with Knotless Suture Anchor: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background: The soft tissue in the shoulder plays a significant role in anterior shoulder instability, leading to humeral head displacement from the glenoid fossa. Arthroscopic Bankart repair is a widely accepted method to restore the labrum to the joint rim. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Bankart repair by knotless suture anchors at medium-term follow-up, assess the functional outcomes of the knotless suture anchor method for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability, and conduct clinical assessment using the Rowe score at 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month intervals in patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair using a 2.8 mm knotless suture anchor (MINI-VIM PK® ) were enrolled. They were assessed for shoulder stability, range of motion (ROM), and functional outcomes using the Rowe scale at the baseline, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up intervals as part of the planned early efficacy measures. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 28.10 ± 6.14. In this trial, 51 patients (69.86%) were diagnosed with recurrent shoulder dislocation on the left side, and 22 patients (30.14%) on the right side. The Rowe score demonstrated a significant improvement (P < 0.0001), increasing from 44.73 ± 1.64 to 95.62 ± 18.33 at the 12-month follow-up period. This indicated better clinical outcomes and reduced recurrence of instability with the use of knotless suture anchors. Conclusion: The use of knotless suture anchors demonstrated reduced recurrence rates, improved post-operative shoulder motion, and increased stability without adding complexity to the procedure.

Arthroscopic Bankart versus Open Latarjet; Short-to-Mid-Term Outcomes of Recurrence and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

Objectives This retrospective comparative study compared the short to mid-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet procedures in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Methods Patients who underwent either arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet procedures between 2008 and 2020, with at least one year of follow-up, were included. Arthroscopic Bankart repairs were performed on shoulders with minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%), and the Latarjet procedure was performed if the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showed a 15% bone loss on the glenoid side or 30-40% humeral head bone loss. Their surgery results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Results 133 patients were analyzed in Latarjet (n = 67) and Bankart groups (n = 66). Before surgery, the two groups of patients were similar regarding surgery side, hand dominance, education level, occupation difficulty level, and smoking (P>0.05). However, Latarjet’s patients were younger (32 vs. 35, P=0.04), had a higher proportion of males (96% vs. 82%, P=0.01), and had a significantly shorter follow-up period (3.2 vs. 6.4 years, P<0.001) than the Bankart group. There was no significant difference between the Latarjet and Bankart groups regarding the follow-up’s OSS score (37 vs. 36; P=0.94) and SPADI score (22 vs. 24, P=0.80). Dislocation was observed in only one patient (1.5%) in the Latarjet group (P=1.0). Subluxation was observed in 5 patients (7.5%) of the Latarjet group and three patients (4.5%) of the Bankart group (P=0.4). The overall instability rate was similar (P>0.05). Conclusion Our findings suggest that both arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet are reliable techniques in short to mid-term follow-up based on the glenoid bone loss cut-off of 15%. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level III

Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Indian Population: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction: The past two decades have witnessed significant development in arthroscopic management for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Currently, arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is popular in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. There is a dramatic rise in the number of orthopedic surgeons in India specializing in shoulder surgery and is believed to be secondary to the advancement in arthroscopic techniques and implants. However, there is a paucity of Indian literature on functional outcomes of ABR. The purpose of the current review is to better understand the functional outcomes of ABR in the Indian population. Methods: A search of major databases (Embase, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library) was performed in April 2020. Reference lists of selected research articles were further screened in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis were used to generate the final list of studies. Results: A total of ten research studies were included in the final analysis representing a pooled patient population set of 391 patients. The mean age for patients across the studies was 27 years (range: 24–29) of age and the average number of dislocations before surgery was five (range: 0–14). The average follow-up period post-surgery was 20 months (range: 6–27 months). Among the functional scores, the average UCLA score improved from 22 (range: 18–30) at preoperatively to 32 (range: 31–35), and the mean Rowe score improved from an average of 27 (range: 24–63) preoperatively to 91 (range: 90–94) during the follow up duration. The average postoperative re-dislocation rate was 7% (range: 0%–10%). Conclusion: In the Indian population, ABR provides consistently good functional outcomes with a low postoperative re-dislocation rate, which is at par with the global data. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are needed to validate these results.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair among Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

OBJECTIVE: To note the functional outcome of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with Bankart repair (BR) treated with arthroscopic stabilisation with suture anchors. METHODOLOGY: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, from January 2021 to June 2022. Patients undergoing arthroscopic BR with anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint with at least >6 episodes of dislocation/subluxation in the last six months were analysed. Functional outcomes were assessed at one-month, three-month and six month intervals post-surgery using "Modified University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)" and "Simple Shoulder Test (SST)". RESULTS: Of 25 patients, 24 (96.0%) were male. The mean age was 27.20±4.0 years. The mean duration of symptoms was 9.1±6.2 months. In 16 (64.0%) patients, 2-suture anchors were utilised, while 3-suture anchors were used in the remaining 9 (36.0%) patients. Pre-surgery, the mean UCLA score was 16.4±5.6 and improved to 1-month, 3-month and 6-month as 16.6±5.1, 22.8±6.2 and 28.4±6.6 respectively (p<0.001). Pre-surgery, the mean SST score was 4.7±2.4 which improved to 1-month, 3-month and 6-month as 5.4±2.6, 8.1±3.3 and 11.2±3.1 respectively (p<0.001). All patients (100%) had full range of motion after six months post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic BR in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation was a reliable procedure regarding functional outcomes and range of motion after six months of follow-up. KEYWORDS: Arthroscopy, Bankart repair, shoulder dislocation, suture anchors, range of motion

Long-Term Results of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Does Associated Postero-inferior Capsulolabral Repair Still Have a Role?

To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic anterior Bankart repair with and without associated postero-inferior capsulolabral repair as treatment of anterior glenohumeral instabiliy at minimun 10year follow-up. A retrospective comparative study including patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior Bankart repair to treat anterior glenohumeral instability with glenoid bone-loss < 15% between January 2000 and February 2010 was performed. Outcomes were reported as recurrence rate, type of recurrence (dislocation or subluxation), need for revision surgery, range of motion, complications, and functional status. Outcomes were compared depending on whether a postero-inferior capsulolabral repair was added to the anterior Bankart repair. 70 shoulders [59 males, mean age 28.2 (range 14-56), mean follow-up 146.1 (range 120-208) months] were included. Recurrence occurred in 9 cases (12.8%), including 3 dislocations and 6 subluxations. Revision surgery was needed in 8 (11.4%). Mean Rowe score improved from 29.7 (11.6) preoperatively to 87.1 (12.3) postoperatively. 83.3% returned to previous sports activities. Mean forward flexion changed from 173.5° (19.2) to 168.4º(10.4) (P < 0.01), external rotation from 81.4° (18) to 75.7° (10.5) (P < 0.01), and internal rotation decreased from 66.2% reaching T12 to 14.1% (P < 0.01). Addition of postero-inferior capsulolabral repair did not influence any of the outcomes significantly. Postero-inferior capsulolabral repair added to anterior Bankart repair as treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability in abscence of significant glenoid bone-loss did not influence the outcomes in terms of recurrence, range of motion, return to sports, or functional status, compared to isolated anterior Bankart repair at 12.2year follow-up. Level III.

Consideration May Be Given to Lowering the Threshold for the Addition of Remplissage in Patients With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

PurposeTreatment for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability with subcritical bone loss is evolving. The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without Hill–Sachs remplissage in patients with <15% glenoid bone loss.MethodsA multicenter retrospective study was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair (IBR) or arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) by 4 shoulder specialists between 2013 and 2019. Range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at baseline and 2 years postoperative: Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale for pain. Recurrence, return to sport, satisfaction, complications, and revisions also were reviewed.ResultsA total of 123 patients were available, including 75 IBR and 48 REMP. Baseline demographics, activity, ROM, and PROs were similar. Mean glenoid bone loss (2.5% vs 6.1%: P < .001) was greater in REMP, although the number of on-track lesions was similar (98.7% vs 93.8%: P = .298). WOSI scores were improved for REMP (196.5 vs 42.7: P = .004), but otherwise no difference in postoperative PROs or ROM. Differences between cohorts did not reach significance in return to sport (73% vs 83%: P = .203), recurrence (9.3% vs 2.1%: P = .148), or revisions (6.8% vs 2.1%: P = .403). For on-track lesions there were 6 recurrences in IBR (6 of 74; 8.1%) and 1 recurrence in REMP (1 of 45; 2.2%).ConclusionsDespite slightly worse pathology, patients with subcritical bone loss who undergo REMP experience similar short-term postoperative function to isolated IBR. Recurrence, revision, and return to sport favored REMP but this study was underpowered to show statistical significance. Recurrence was common following IBR, despite subcritical glenoid bone loss and primarily on-track lesions, suggesting that REMP can be considered in on-track lesions.Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective comparative study.

Long-Term Results and Failure Analysis of the Open Latarjet Procedure and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Adolescents.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair compared with an open Latarjet procedure in adolescents who are at high risk for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. We hypothesized that the long-term stability rate of an open Latarjet procedure would be superior to that of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Forty eligible patients (41 shoulders) with a mean age of 16.4 years (range, 13 to 18 years) underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair, and 37 patients (40 shoulders) with a mean age of 16.7 years (range, 14 to 18 years) underwent an open Latarjet procedure. Of these, 34 patients (35 shoulders) in the Bankart group and 30 patients (31 shoulders) in the Latarjet group with long-term follow-up were compared; the overall follow-up rate was 82%. Clinical and radiographic results were obtained after a mean follow-up of 12.2 years (range, 8 to 18 years). Treatment failure occurred in 20 shoulders (57%) in the Bankart repair group and in 2 shoulders (6%) in the open Latarjet procedure group (p < 0.001), representing a significantly higher revision rate for instability in the Bankart group (13) compared with the Latarjet group (1) (p < 0.001). In patients without recurrent shoulder instability (15 in the Bankart group and 29 in the Latarjet group), there was a significant improvement in the Constant score (p = 0.006 in the Bankart group and p < 0.001 in the Latarjet group) and Subjective Shoulder Value (p = 0.009 in the Bankart group and p < 0.001 in the Latarjet group), without any significant difference between the 2 groups. Younger age was the only variable significantly correlated with failure following a Bankart repair (p = 0.01). Adolescents are at a high risk for treatment failure after Bankart repair, and, therefore, the Latarjet procedure should be strongly considered as a primary procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in this population. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No Difference in Outcomes After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage or Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability

PurposeTo evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (ABRR) compared with the arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) procedure for anterior shoulder instability in patients with a labral tear and a concomitant engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.MethodsA retrospective review of patients who underwent either ABRR or the AL procedure for a diagnosis of anterior shoulder instability with a concomitant engaging Hill-Sachs lesion between 2011 and 2019 was performed. Recurrent instability, the visual analog scale score, the Subjective Shoulder Value, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score, patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo surgery again, and return to work or sport were evaluated.ResultsOur study included 41 patients treated with ABRR and 26 treated with the AL procedure. At final follow-up, there was no difference between patients who underwent ABRR and those who underwent the AL procedure in the reported Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score (21.8% vs 28.2%, P = .33) or any of its components, the visual analog scale score (0.9 vs 1.4, P = .32), the Subjective Shoulder Value (78.4 vs 74.5, P = .6062), the rate of satisfaction (81.6% vs 85.6%, P = .54), or whether patients would undergo surgery again (81.6% vs 96.1%, P = .16). Overall, 5 patients in the ABRR group and 2 patients in the AL group had recurrent instability events (12.2% vs 7.8%, P = .70), with no significant difference in the rate of recurrent dislocation (12.2% vs 3.8%, P = .39).ConclusionsIn patients with anterior shoulder instability and a concomitant Hill-Sachs lesion, both ABRR and the AL procedure were shown to be reliable treatments, with a low rate of recurrent instability and excellent patient-reported outcomes in appropriately selected patients. However, our study could not determine whether there was critical glenoid bone loss in patients undergoing ABRR, and surgeons should still exercise caution in performing ABRR in patients with high-grade glenoid bone loss or in those with failed prior stabilizations.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.

Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage

Objectives:Arthroscopic Bankart repair with Hill-Sachs remplissage (BHSR) is suggested to treat anterior shoulder instability when there is an engaging humeral lesion. The objective of this study was to report the long-term clinical and radiological results of this procedure.Methods:This is a retrospective monocentric study including patients who underwent surgery for anterior shoulder instability by BHSR, seen again within a minimum of 5 years. 70% of the 51 patients (mean age 26 years; 16 - 49; ± 8.453 years) practiced sports. The mean ISIS score was 3.306 (0 - 7; ± 1.798). At the last follow-up, active range of motion, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores were measured. A radiographic assessment enabled the evaluation of arthrosis according to Samilson’s classification.Results:At a mean clinical follow-up of 86.8 months (60.0 - 123.9 ± 17.0 months), 83% of the patients had resumed sports activities. The mean Rowe, Walch-Duplay and SSV scores were 88.8 points (51-100; ± 12.4), 82.6 points (50 - 100; ± 16.4) and 87.9% (50 - 100, ± 8.5), respectively. 8 patients (15.6%) had a recurrence of dislocation or incomplete dislocation. In univariate analysis, patients who were stable at the last follow-up had a significant mean decrease in external rotation in adduction of 7° (p = 0.02) and in abduction of 6° RE2 (p = 0.006), a shallower Hill-Sachs (18% vs 25% of the humeral head diameter; p = 0.04), and were older (27 vs 19 years, p = 0.04). Radiographically, 84% of the patients had no osteoarthritis progression, while 13% had grade I osteoarthritis progression.Conclusion:BHSR allows resumption of sports activity in the majority of cases, with minor limitation of external rotation. However, the high failure rate in more than 5 years suggests that this procedure should be proposed with caution in case of a deep Hill-Sachs in young subjects.

Mid-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with a history of seizures

BackgroundSeizure predisposes patients to shoulder dislocation. However, there is no consensus regarding the best management approach for recurrent shoulder dislocation in patients who have a history of seizures. In this study, we report the outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair augmented by Remplissage for the recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation in a series of patients with a history of seizures.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 27 patients with 29 recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations who were treated with the arthroscopic Bankart repair were included. All cases had deep Hill-Sachs lesions according to Hardy classification that was managed with a Remplissage technique. Patients with a glenoid defect of more than 20% in the CT scan were excluded. Twenty-two patients had an epileptic seizure, while the remaining five patients had convulsions due to other causes. The mean age of the patients was 28.3 ± 6.2 years. The mean follow-up of the patients was 3.1 ± 1.2 years. Outcome measures included the shoulder range of motion that was compared with the non-injured side in the unilateral subjects and the shoulder function that was evaluated by the Rowe score and the Walch-Duplay score.ResultsThe mean forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were not significantly different between injured and non-injured shoulder (p = 0.34, p = 0.41, p = 0.11, p = 0.23). The mean Rowe score was 49.1 ± 7.8 before the surgery and 92.1 ± 6.4 at the last visit (p < 0.001). According to the Walch-Duplay score, the shoulders were categorized as excellent, good, and fair in 17 (58.7%), 11 (37.9%), and 1 (3.4%) shoulder, respectively. The overall rate of instability recurrence was 17.2% (n = 5).ConclusionIn patients with a history of seizures, arthroscopic Bankart repair augmented by Remplissage could be regarded as a safe and efficient method for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with glenoid defect < 20%.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair for first time versus recurrent anterior shoulder instability in athletes- comparative Study

Background: Following an initial traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation, the incidence of recurrent instability ranges from 14% to 100%. The risk of recurrent dislocations is influenced by the age at the time of initial dislocation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the results of arthroscopic bankart repair of acute anterior shoulder dislocation for first time in athletes and comparison the results with delayed arthroscopic bankart repair Patient and methods: The present study included 40 patients complaining of anterior shoulder dislocation, 20 patients of them were with first time anterior shoulder dislocation and 20 patients with recurrent dislocation. All patients underwent Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability. The constant shoulder score was used for assess the outcomes Results: There was statistically significant difference between pre and post-operative outcome in first time dislocation patients. There was statistically significant difference between pre and post-operative outcome in recurrent dislocation patients. There was no statistically significant difference according to post-operative outcomes between in first time and recurrent dislocation patients. Conclusion: there were no differences in outcomes and constant shoulder score among patients undergoing surgery after the primary dislocation when compared with those undergoing surgery after recurrent shoulder dislocation.

Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repairs for anterior instability of the shoulder in patients aged thirty years or older.

Bankart repair is a popular treatment for anterior shoulder instability. However, long-term failure rates of arthroscopic Bankart repair remain higher than Latarjet procedures. The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients greater than 30 years old and analyze risk factors of failure following arthroscopic Bankart repair that are independent of younger age. Between January 1999 and December 2003, 41 patients aged 30 years or older treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability were evaluated. Outcome measures included pain (VAS), range of motion, post-operative Walch-Duplay, WOSII scores, complications, failure rate, and risk factors of failure. Failure was defined as recurrent dislocation or subluxation. At a mean 12-year follow-up (range; 10-15 years), the failure rate of arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients aged 30 years and older was 37%. The mean post-operative Walch-Duplay score was significantly higher in patients who had no recurrence compared to those who had had recurrence of instability (100 versus 90, p=0.02). An ISIS score≥3 (p=0.02), a glenoid bone lesion (p=0.06), and a Hill-Sachs lesion>15% defect (p=0.001) were risk factors for recurrent instability. When considering a modified ISIS score that accounted for bony defects on the glenoid and humeral side, patients with an ISIS score <3 + no glenoid lesion + Hill-Sachs ≤ 15% had a recurrence rate of 0%. The failure rate of arthroscopic Bankart repairs in patients over 30 was higher than previously reported. Specifically, patients with an ISIS >3 and bony glenoid defects and/or Hill-Sachs lesions > 15% may be at higher risk for recurrent instability following an isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair. Alternative stabilization techniques may need to be considered for this subset of patients.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Immobilization for First Episode of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Before the Age of 25: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The risk of recurrence after the first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation is high with nonoperative treatment in younger patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and nonoperative treatment for shoulder dislocation in patients younger than 25 years, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The hypothesis was that surgery would decrease the risk of recurrence. Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: We included patients aged between 18 and 25 years after a first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation and divided them into 2 groups. The first group was treated surgically with an arthroscopic Bankart repair within 2 weeks after the dislocation; the second group was treated nonoperatively. Both groups were immobilized for 3 weeks in internal rotation and followed the same physical therapy protocol. Standard radiography and computed tomography were performed immediately after reduction of the dislocation, and follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was instability recurrence, defined as another anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction by another person (the patient was unable to reduce the dislocated joint themselves), a subluxation, or a positive apprehension test. Secondary outcome measures included range of motion, return to sport, and functional scores such as the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score the Walch-Duplay score, and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Results: A total of 20 patients were included in each group. The mean ± SD age was 21 ± 1.8 years, and there were 33 men (82.5%) and 7 women (17.5%) in the total sample. Recurrence of instability was significantly decreased in the surgical treatment group compared with the nonoperative group (2 [10%] vs 14 [70%], respectively; P = .0001). Fewer patients in the surgical treatment group versus the nonoperative group had another episode of dislocation (0 vs 6 [30%], respectively), subluxation (2 [10%] vs 13 [65%], respectively; P = .003), or a positive apprehension test (1 [5%] vs 11 [58%], respectively; P = .0005). The Walch-Duplay score (88.4 vs 70.3 points; P = .046) and WOSI (11.5 vs 17.7 points; P = .035) were significantly better in the surgical group versus the nonoperative group after a 2-year follow-up. Level of sport was the same or better in 89% of the surgical treatment group vs 53% of the nonoperative treatment group (P = .012). No surgical complication was recorded. We did not find any significant difference in range of motion. Conclusion: In patients with first-time shoulder dislocations, arthroscopic labral repair (Bankart procedure) reduced the risk of secondary shoulder dislocation and improved functional outcome versus nonoperative treatment after a 2-year follow-up. Surgical treatment after a first episode of shoulder dislocation could be offered as a primary treatment option in a younger population if these results are confirmed by larger studies with a longer follow-up. Registration: NCT03315819 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

Comparison between all-suture and biocomposite anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A retrospective cohort study

PurposeSuture anchors have revolutionized arthroscopic surgery, enabling direct soft tissue-to-bone repair. There are many types of anchors still used in arthroscopic shoulder operations. We sought to compare the clinical outcome of all-suture and biocomposite anchors when used in arthroscopic Bankart repair for patients suffering from anterior shoulder instability. MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort study of 30 patients (mean age: 26.6 years, SD: 8.8 years, male/female ratio: 5/1, mean follow up: 28 months, SD: 23.8, range: 12–92) with anterior shoulder instability was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups based upon the type of suture anchors used for the Bankart repair: group A (14 patients) used only all-suture anchors and group B (16 patients) used only biocomposite anchors. Outcomes reported were postoperative dislocations, positive shoulder apprehension test, self-reported sense of shoulder instability, return to activities of daily living, return to sports, patient satisfaction and complications. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used were the Rowe Score for Instability, Constant Shoulder Score, Walch Duplay Score, The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score and external rotation at 90° of arm abduction, external rotation at 0° of arm abduction, forward flexion, abduction, adduction and internal rotation. ResultsRates of postoperative shoulder dislocation demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 groups (p > .05). Four postoperative dislocations happened, two in each group (14.3% and 12.5% for all suture only and biocomposite only groups, respectively), with three of them being traumatic. In addition, no significant differences were observed amongst groups regarding shoulder apprehension test (group A: 85.7% vs. group B: 93.8%), sense of shoulder instability (7.1% vs. 6.3%), return to activities of daily living (group A: 85.7% vs. group B: 93.8%), return to sports (group A: 85.7% vs. group B: 87.5%), patient satisfaction (moderate level: group A 21.4% vs. group B 12.5%), and PROMs. ConclusionThe short-term failure rate and clinical/functional outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair using all-suture anchors is similar to the use of biocompatible anchors. Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recurrent Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder in Baseball Player

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recurrent Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder in Baseball Player

The clinical and functional outcome of arthroscopic bankart repair in recurrent shoulder dislocation

Background: Study aimed to assess the functional and clinical outcome of arthroscopic bankart’s repair in recurrent shoulder dislocation using UCLA & SST scoring system.Methods: It is a prospective cohort study conducted on the 28 patients undergoing arthroscopic bankart’s repair for recurrent shoulder dislocation in the department of orthopaedics at vydehi institute of medical sciences and research centre, bengaluru from September 2017 to October 2019. Patients aged between 18-50 years of both genders undergoing arthroscopic bankart repair with anterior instability of glenohumeral joint with at least ≥2 episode of dislocation/subluxation, a positive clinical apprehension test and radiological evidence of glenohumeral instability and glenoid bone loss < 25% were included in the study and patients with glenoid bone loss >25%, contact sports athletes, previously failed arthroscopy or open surgery, seizure disorder, multidirectional instability/habitual dislocation were exclueded. Each case was followed post operatively for atleast 1 year.Results: This series consisted of 28 patients, with the mean follow up period of 12 months, the mean pre-operative UCLA score of 18 improved to 31.75 post operatively, the mean pre-operative SST score of 4.89 improved to 10.96 post operatively. Out of 28 patients none had episodes of recurrent dislocation and anterior translation or apprehension. External rotation in 90º of abduction improved in 25 patients (89%).Conclusion: we conclude that arthroscopic bankart’s repair in recurrent shoulder dislocation with suture anchors is a reliable procedure with respect to shoulder function, recurrence rate and range of movement.

Functional outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair in post-traumatic recurrent shoulder dislocation in a private tertiary care teaching hospital in eastern India

&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations are quite common in young patients with Bankart lesions. The open Bankart repair was the gold standard for years, however arthroscopic Bankart repair has gained popularity. The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results of arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for post-traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation were included in the study. This was a prospective study conducted at a tertiary care Hospital in Kolkata, India between August 2017 to May 2019. All patients were followed up at an interval of 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. Rowe score was used to assess the functional outcomes of the patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; 34 (91.9%) patients reported good to excellent results, whereas only 2 (5.4%) patients had fair outcome and 1 (2.7%) patient demonstrated poor surgical result. The total rowe score improved from 46.62 pre-operatively to 94.20 post-operatively after 1 year (p&amp;lt;0.01). By the end of 1-year follow-up, 35 (94.6%) patients had full range of motion in all the planes. Majority of (89.2%) patients did not have any complications. Only 1 patient out of 37 had a recurrence (2.7%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Arthroscopic Bankart repair is an effective, cosmetic and safe surgical procedure with good clinical outcomes and excellent post-operative shoulder range of motion. This surgical intervention also has low recurrence rate and minimum surgical complications.&lt;/p&gt;

Risk Factors for Recurrence After Arthroscopic Instability Repair—The Importance of Glenoid Bone Loss >15%, Patient Age, and Duration of Symptoms: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Background: Glenoid bone loss (GBL) has been implicated as a risk factor for failure of arthroscopic anterior glenohumeral instability repair. Although certain amounts of GBL are associated with higher recurrence rates, there are limited studies on successes versus failures in these cohorts. Purpose: To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with and without GBL to determine a threshold percentage of GBL that predicts success. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability between 2004 and 2013 were prospectively enrolled. Patients with ≤25% GBL were included. Patients with no GBL were grouped and compared with those having 5% to 25% GBL. Outcomes included Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, Western Ontario Shoulder Index, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, with evidence of recurrent instability. Patients with and without GBL were statistically compared with respect to outcomes and recurrence rates. Results: Of 434 eligible patients, the cases of 405 (45 female, 360 male; mean age, 27.5 years [range, 18-47 years]) were followed for a mean 61 months (range, 48-96 months). There were 189 (46.6%) with no GBL and 216 (53.3%) with GBL; the mean GBL of the latter cohort was 15% (range, 5%-25%). The mean duration of instability symptoms was 7.9 months (range, 1-21 months) and was significantly longer in the GBL group (P < .05). The mean recurrence rate was 14.8%, which was significantly greater in patients presenting with GBL versus those with none (48/216 [22.2%] vs 12/189 [6.3%]; P < .01). Within the GBL group, GBL ≥15%, duration of symptoms >5 months, and younger age (<20 years) were independent risk factors for failure (P < .01). Patients with any GBL had >4-times greater odds of recurrence after arthroscopic stabilization (odds ratio, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.16-8.21). Moreover, patients presenting for arthroscopic Bankart repair with GBL ≥15% had nearly 3-times greater odds of recurrent instability. Conclusion: GBL ≥15% in an active patient population portends to increased odds of recurrent instability events and inferior clinical outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Furthermore, nonmodifiable risk factors, such as age (<20 years) and duration of symptoms before presentation (>5 months), significantly affect risk of recurrence and should be key factors when counseling patients on risk of failure and determining the ideal procedure for the individual patient.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotless suture anchors: A comparison of the permanent and absorbable types

Aim:The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) using two types of knotless suture anchors (KSAs) in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability (AGHI).Methods:Thirty-two patients underwent an ABR using KSAs: a permanent KSA (PushLock) and an absorbable counterpart (BioKnotless). There were 16 patients in each group. Pre-and post-operative assessment for shoulder function using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant–Murley scores, recurrence of instability, post-operative limitation of external rotation (ER) and ability to return to pre-injury level were recorded in both groups.Results:Both groups displayed significant improvements in functional scores ( p &lt; 0.0001) without a significant difference between the groups. Of the 32 patients, 9.4% had recurrence of instability (one re-dislocation in group 1 and two symptomatic subluxations in group 2). Return to pre-injury level occurred in 87.5% and 81.3% of group 1 and group 2, respectively. There was 2° to 3° loss of ER after ABR in both groups; the difference between the groups was not significant ( p = 0.45).Conclusion:ABR for recurrent AGHI using a permanent or absorbable KSA offers comparable successful outcomes; no significant statistical difference was found.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Anterior glenohumeral instability is among the most common conditions requiring orthopaedic care, particularly in the athletic population. The evaluation and management of anterior instability is dependent on many factors and a thorough understanding of each component of the patient's instability is necessary to achieve an optimal outcome. Patient factors including age, activity level, sport and number of instability events must be considered along with examination and imaging findings. A variety of treatment options, both surgical and nonsurgical, exist to manage anterior instability, however, selecting the optimal surgical treatment is not always simple. This review will discuss the role of the arthroscopic Bankart repair in the surgical management of anterior glenohumeral instability. The preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications will be discussed in the context of the available literature validating this approach to surgical stabilization. The outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair will be reviewed including recurrent instability, return to sport and patient reported outcome measures to illustrate the appropriate application of this technique.