The Authors Reply: Rooney encourages epidemiologists to “have the courage to explore controversial risks” when seeking explanations for higher rates of preterm delivery among African-American women. Curiously, his definition of courage seems to entail considering only induced abortion as a possible risk factor. He is notably silent, however, on the courage required to address racism forthrightly as a possible determinant of population distribution of preterm delivery. 1,2 Generating a hypothesis requires at least two obligations. One is development of a plausible causal scenario. The other is a comprehensive and critical review of evidence pro and con. Rooney, however, neither proposes a plausible biological mechanism linking risk of preterm delivery to induced abortion, nor does he acknowledge (a) epidemiologic research finding no evidence of association between induced abortion and subsequent risk of preterm delivery, 3–11 (b) substantive flaws in the studies he cites in favor of his hypothesis (for example, failing to control for parity 12), or (c) research explicitly refuting his hypothesis. 13–16 Specifically, two studies comparing risk of preterm delivery among African-American compared with U.S. white women that take into account history of abortion and other relevant confounders still report a nearly twofold higher risk among the African-American women, 13,15 and two report a 1.4–1.5-fold higher risk 14,16 —and all four investigations are among the studies Rooney cites in favor of his hypothesis! As a corrective, we accordingly note that the preponderance of epidemiologic research indicates either no association or only a very small association between induced abortion and risk of preterm delivery 3–11 (the same is true for risk of breast cancer and abortion, which Rooney also invokes, despite recent studies addressing limitations of earlier investigations, superseding possible biological plausibility of a hypothesized association 17–27). The leading postulated pathway linking induced abortion and subsequent risk of preterm delivery is excessive cervical dilation, which may weaken the cervix, thereby possibly leading to cervical incompetence in a subsequent pregnancy. 3–5 Yet, at present 96.7% of legal abortions in the United States are performed by vacuum aspiration, 28 a procedure not involving excessive dilation of the cervix. Even this retelling of the evidence, however, barely begins to tackle the many other issues on which Rooney is silent. Among the nine studies Rooney cites, 12–16,29–32 six include minimal or no socioeconomic data, 12,13,16,28,29,32 even though socioeconomic position is known to be associated with both likelihood of abortion and risk of preterm delivery, thereby leaving considerable room for residual confounding. 1,33 Similarly, as noted by Collins et al, 2 to date remarkably little research has explored associations between other social phenomena that are distressingly prevalent and potentially linked to risk of preterm delivery: racism, violence, and poverty across the life course and possibly even intergenerationally. 1,2,34 Relevant distinct pathways linking these social phenomena to their embodied biological expression include links between social and material deprivation and infection; neuroendocrine disruption resulting from chronic exposure to discrimination or threats of violence; and restricted access to health care, including family planning services. Courage? It takes courage to look fairly at evidence supporting—let alone contradicting–one’s prior beliefs. Nancy Krieger Janet Rich-Edwards