Outcome Measures In Rheumatology Clinical Trials Research Articles

How to Monitor Disease Activity of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Clinical Practice.

Treatment guided by periodic and quantitative data assessment results in better outcomes compared to using clinical gestalt. While validated generic as well as specific disease activity measures for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are available, there is vast scope to improve their actual utilization in routine clinical practice. In this review, we discuss available disease activity measures for axSpA, describe results from the survey conducted among general rheumatologists as well as Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (SPARTAN) members about disease activity measurement in daily practice, and discuss ways to improve axSpA disease activity using technological advances. We also discuss the definitions of active disease and target for the treatment of axSpA. The 2019 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Spondylitis Association of America (SAA)/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (SPARTAN) axSpA treatment guidelines conditionally recommend the regular monitoring of disease activity using a validated measure such as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Severity Index (ASDAS). Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) guidelines recommend ASDAS as the most appropriate instrument for the assessment of disease activity, preferably calculated using C-reactive protein (CRP). ASAS has selected a core set of variables which were updated recently and have been endorsed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) group in order to bring homogeneity in assessment of axSpA. In a recent study, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures were able to discriminate inactive, moderate, and high-very high ASDAS activity groups. A newly developed semi-objective index P4 (pain, physical function, patient global, and physician global) correlates well with BASDAI and ASDAS in axSpA and can also be used for other rheumatic diseases in busy clinical practices. Regular disease activity monitoring is critical for long-term management of axSpA and shared decision-making. The integration of electronic health records and smart devices provides a great opportunity to capture patient-reported data. Automated capture of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) is a highly efficient way and results in consistent regular monitoring and may improve the long-term outcomes. While currently used measures focus only on musculoskeletal symptoms of axSpA, a composite disease activity measure that can also incorporate extra-articular manifestations may provide a better assessment of disease activity.

Evaluation of major salivary glands with ultrasonography in multiple sclerosis patients

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the homogeneity of the major salivary glands in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients using ultrasonography (USG), assess DMFT indices, measure resting salivary flow rates, and compare these values with healthy individuals.MethodsIn this study, 20 individuals diagnosed with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) (mean age 36.15 ± 8.51) and 20 systemically healthy individuals (mean age 35.7 ± 9.22) were included. Oral and radiologic examinations were performed in all individuals. The parotid and submandibular salivary glands were examined using USG, and their homogeneity was assessed based on the scoring system recommended by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) study group. Resting salivary flow rates and DMFT indices were measured, and the obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis.ResultsThe parotid glands exhibited more heterogeneity on USG within the MS patient group than the control group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.015). A statistically significant correlation was observed in total homogeneity values between the patient and control groups (p = 0.021). Furthermore, the MS patient group exhibited higher DMFT indices and lower salivary flow rates than the control group. The difference between the DMFT indices and salivary flow rate between the patient groups was statistically significant (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002 respectively).ConclusionsThe parenchyma of the major salivary glands in MS patients exhibited decreased homogeneity than the healthy controls. Additionally, the MS group showed a decrease in salivary flow rate and an increase in the DMFT index. Autonomic dysfunction and medications used for MS are thought to cause salivary gland hypofunction and dry mouth. It can be interpreted that hyposalivation and motor skill losses in MS patients lead to an increase in DMFT index.

The Role of Major Salivary Gland Ultrasound in the Diagnostic Workup of Sicca Syndrome: A Large Single-Centre Study.

(1) Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of major salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) in primary Sjogren's syndrome (SS), we used the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) scoring system on a large single-centre cohort of patients with sicca syndrome. (2) Method: We retrospectively collected the clinical, imaging and serological data of all the patients referred with a suspicion of SS who underwent SGUS and minor salivary glands biopsy. (3) Results: A total of 132 patients were included. The SGUS scores were correlated between the two sides (p < 0.001). The diagnostic cut-off for SS (AUROC: 0.7408) was 6 for the SGUS-global sum (sensitivity: 32.43%; specificity: 96.84%). The cut-off with the highest specificity for SS diagnosis was 7. In the patients with a final diagnosis of SS, the mean SGUS score was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of the non-SS patients (3.73 vs. 1.32 for the SGUS-global sum). A significant correlation was demonstrated between the SGUS scores and final SS diagnosis (p < 0.001), biopsy positivity (p < 0.001), ANA positivity (p = 0.016), Ro-SSA positivity (p = 0.01), and gland fibrosis (p = 0.02). (4) Conclusions: SGUS, using the OMERACT scoring system, has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for the diagnosis of SS. The scoring showed a strong and direct correlation with all the clinical hallmarks of SS diagnosis, such as the positivity of a labial salivary gland biopsy, ANA and Ro-SSA statuses, and salivary gland fibrosis. Because of its high specificity, a SGUS-global score > 6 could be therefore employed for the diagnosis of SS in the case of ANA negativity or the unavailability of a biopsy.

Diagnostic value of ultrasound evaluation of major salivary glands for Sjögren’s syndrome based on the novel OMERACT scoring system

ObjectiveThe novel Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) scoring system was used to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of major salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) for Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Materials and methodsSGUS was performed on the parotid glands (PGs) and submandibular glands of 242 patients (145 patients with SS and 97 patients without SS) using the OMERACT scoring system (grade 0–3). We also evaluated the association of SGUS scores with unstimulated whole salivary flow rate (UWSF), stimulated whole salivary flow rate (SWSF), and labial salivary gland biopsy (LSGB) results. ResultsThe SGUS scores were significantly higher for the SS group than for the non-SS group (p < 0.001). Using a cutoff value of 8 for the total score yielded the highest sensitivity (76%), specificity (90%), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC, 0.828). The correlation between SGUS scores and salivary gland function was moderate to good. A cutoff value of 10 for the total score was more effective in predicting SWSF outcomes than UWSF outcomes (sensitivity: 73% > 58%, specificity: 98% > 87%, and AUC: 0.856 > 0.723). The association of OMERACT scores with LSGB results was fair to moderate. Among 61 anti-SSA-negative patients, 17 had positive PG scores (including ten SS and seven non-SS patients), and 44 had negative PG scores (including 37 non-SS and seven SS patients). ConclusionThe OMERACT scoring system had good sensitivity and excellent specificity, demonstrating excellent diagnostic potential for SS and efficacy in assessing salivary gland function. Negative SGUS results may help reduce unnecessary biopsies in anti-SSA-negative patients.

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis using OMERACT and EuroTMjoint classifications

This retrospective case–control study compared inflammatory and structural damage in the temporomandibular joint of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and its subtypes and healthy patients using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) and EuroTMjoint classifications. Correlations between the scores of the two classifications and time of diagnosis were evaluated. Twenty-nine JIA patients and 48 age-matched healthy participants were examined. TMJ images on each side were considered individually. Oligoarticular and polyarticular subtypes were present in 44.8% and 55.2% of patients, respectively. The JIA group presented a higher frequency and more severe signs of inflammatory and structural changes (P < 0.05), except for effusion (P = 0.83). The polyarticular subtype showed a higher change intensity. The time of JIA diagnosis was not correlated with inflammatory and structural changes. Positive correlations between inflammation and bone deformity scores were observed for the EuroTMjoint classification (r = 0.462, P < 0.001; low correlation) and OMERACT classification (r = 0.737, P < 0.001; high correlation). Positive correlations between the OMERACT and EuroTMjoint classifications were found for inflammation score (r = 0.907, P < 0.001; very high correlation) and bone deformity score (r = 0.854, P < 0.001; high correlation). Both classifications showed a higher frequency and intensity of inflammation and bone deformity in JIA patients. The results of this study suggest that the appropriate management of inflammation may reduce the potential for structural damage to the TMJ.

Ultrasound remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission.

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to assess ultrasound (US) remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission using different definitions.Material and methodsThis was a cross-sectional study including patients with RA in clinical remission defined by disease activity score (DAS28)-erythrocyte rate (ESR) ≤ 2.6 for at least 6 months. Each patient underwent B-mode and power Doppler (PD) assessments of 42 joints and 20 tendons. B-mode and PD signal for synovitis and tenosynovitis (TS) were defined and graded semi-quantitatively (0–3) according to the outcome measures in rheumatology clinical trials (OMERACT). Several different definitions of US remission were examined: the absence of synovial hypertrophy (SH), TS on B-mode and PD signal, the absence of SH and PD signal, a grade ≤ 1 of SH and the absence of PD, a grade ≤ 1 of SH and PD, the absence of PD, or a grade of PD ≤ 1. The DAS28, clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simple disease activity index (SDAI), and the Boolean American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) remission criteria were compared.ResultsThirty-seven patients were enrolled. The rate of remission according to the different composite indices was 70.2% for the SDAI, 64.8% for the CDAI, and 54% for the ACR/EULAR Boolean criteria. Synovial hypertrophy and TS in B-mode were detected in 94.6% and 40.5% of patients, respectively. Synovitis with PD signal was found in 59.5% and 13.5% of patients had TS with PD, respectively. Ultrasound remission at joints and tendons was found in 5.4–62.2% of patients. For the other remission criteria: CDAI, SDAI, and ACR/EULAR Boolean criteria, 7.7–60% of patients showed US remission at joints and tendons.ConclusionsClinical remission, even classified by strict composite indices, does not seem to be the closest method to the concept of absence of inflammatory activity; hence the interest of integrating US in assessing remission in practice.

Ultrasonography of Shoulder in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Reliability Exercise Using Consensual Definitions among Maghrebian Rheumatologists

The shoulder may be affected in a large portion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) worldwide. However, this joint does not receive the attention required during follow-up. Indeed, although numerous clinical tests for diagnosis of a painful shoulder are available, differentiating articular from peri-articular lesions may be difficult in daily practice. Fortunately, the precise diagnosis of shoulder pain in RA has benefited from a reliable imaging modality used to detect its exact origin-ultrasonography (US). This study was aimed at assessing the intra- and inter-observer reliability of ultrasonographic findings for patients with established RA with shoulder pain in a patient-based exercise as a clinical challenge among Maghrebian rheumatologist experts in US. A total of 7 operators examined 10 patients in two rounds independently and blindly of each other. Before beginning the session, all of the rheumatologists reached a consensus on sites and US settings by performing a brief exercise on a normal shoulder. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) definitions of US-detected pathologies were used. Each patient underwent US scanning of the painful shoulder in predefined sites based on US technical guidelines of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology: long head of biceps (LHB), subscapularis recess, posterior recess and axillary recess. The presence of subdeltoid or subcoracoid bursitis or full rupture of the suprasupinatus was identified if present. Intra- and inter-observer reliability measures were calculated using the κ coefficient. Intra-observer reliability was good for gray-scale (GS) synovitis in subscapularis and posterior recesses (κ=0.77 and 0.73, respectively). It was moderate in the presence of GS synovitis and effusion in LHB (κ =0.53 and 0.40, respectively), posterior and subscapularis recess effusion (κ=0.56 and 0.60, respectively) and GS and power Doppler (PD) synovitis in axillary recesses (κ=0.58 and 0.49, respectively). Inter-observer reliability was good for PD for LHB signals (κ=0.78). It was moderate for GS for LHB synovitis (κ=0.54). Inter-observer agreement was poor for effusion and GS synovitis for subscapularis, posterior and axillary recesses, and very poor for PD signals in these recesses. US was a reliable imaging tool for detecting tenosynovitis in the LHB. However, reliability was moderate to poor in detecting synovitis in subscapularis, posterior and axillary recesses. These findings could be optimized by standardization of sites to assess.

Salivary gland ultrasonography in primary Sj\xf6gren\u2019s syndrome from diagnosis to clinical stratification: a multicentre study

BackgroundTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of major salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) using the novel Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) scoring system in a large-scale multicentre study.MethodsSGUS was conducted for 246 pSS patients, 140 control subjects with conditions other than SS and 27 healthy control subjects. The echostructure features from the parotid and submandibular glands on both sides were graded using the novel OMERACT scoring system. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to describe the diagnostic accuracy of the scoring system for pSS. The associations between the SGUS and disease characteristics were analysed to evaluate the clinical value of SGUS for pSS.ResultsThe US scores in the pSS group were significantly higher than those in the non-pSS group (p < 0.001). The level of diagnostic accuracy was comparable with the scores of all four glands (AUC=0.908) when only the parotid and submandibular glands on either side were scored (AUC=0.910, 0.904, respectively). The optimal cut-off value for the left (right) parotid gland and the left (right) submandibular gland was 4, with maximal sensitivity (75.6% and 77.2%, respectively) and specificity (91.6% and 92.2%, respectively). The pSS patients with positive SGUS results presented a longer disease duration, parotid enlargement, dental loss and higher levels of serological markers, such as anti-SSA, anti-SSB, positive RF, IgG and γ-globulin%.ConclusionsSGUS with the OMERACT scoring system yields high sensitivity and specificity, demonstrating high diagnostic feasibility for pSS. The SGUS may have implications for deciding disease severity and treatment efficacy.

Osteoarthritis of the hand: clinical and ultrasound parallels

Osteoarthritis of the hand: clinical and ultrasound parallels

Swaying sickle cell research forward in support of patient reported outcomes.

Swaying sickle cell research forward in support of patient reported outcomes.

Achilles tendon enthesitis evaluated by MRI assessments in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: a report of the methodology of the ACHILLES trial

BackgroundThe currently available scoring methods for enthesitis are often measures of pain but not of inflammation at entheseal sites. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system (PsAMRIS) assesses inflammation and damage in PsA and was particularly developed for the hands. The ACHILLES trial used clinical measures for heel enthesitis in combination with MRI scoring based on PsAMRIS.MethodsPatients (age ≥ 18 years) with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and PsA were included in the trial if they presented with clinical and MRI-positive heel enthesitis. MRI of the affected heel was performed at three time points: screening, Week 24 and Week 52. Inflammatory MRI findings (tendinitis, bursitis and bone marrow oedema [BME]) in the area of the Achilles tendon and/or plantar aponeurosis, periarticular inflammation of the ankle joint and heel erosion were assessed qualitatively (absent/present). In addition, BME and bone erosion were quantitatively assessed based on PsAMRIS, where their proportion was compared to the volume of the affected bone. Mean scores of BME and bone erosion quantification were calculated, and the mean composite score (based on PsAMRIS) was calculated based on the individual score of each subject for periarticular inflammation, BME and bone erosion and further extended for bursitis and tendinitis. Modifications to PsAMRIS were introduced by categorising oedema length as ≤/> 0.5 cm and locating bone erosion.ConclusionsIn ACHILLES, MRI was used to assess and evaluate heel enthesitis. Due to the lack of a validated scoring system for heel enthesitis at the time of ACHILLES initiation, this trial applied quantitative scoring based on PsAMRIS, with specific adaptations for the heel.Trial registrationNational Clinical Trial Registry, NCT02771210. Registered 13 May 2016.

Rheumatology Common Toxicity Criteria (RCTC): An Update Reflecting Real-World Use.

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatology Common Toxicity Criteria (RCTC) version 2.0 was published in 2007 by the OMERACT Drug Safety Working Group, building on limited experience with RCTC version 1.0, to facilitate standardization of assessment (grading) and reporting of adverse events (AEs) commonly seen in rheumatic disease clinical trials (Woodworth et al. in J Rheumatol 34:1401-1414, 2007). The objectives of this study were to (1) report the real-world performance of RCTC 2.0; (2) report immediately correctable errors in RCTC 2.0, and provide a revised RCTC 2.1; and (3) begin to identify the need for a comprehensive revision of RCTC 2.0. Safety data outputs for several large rheumatic/autoimmune disease clinical trials in which RCTC 2.0 was used were evaluated for accuracy of reporting and the ability to assess differences among treatments. We examined RCTC 2.0 tables for errors, as well as for omission of terms for AEs that commonly occur in more recent rheumatology clinical trials. We also considered recommendations from recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and international initiatives such CDISC (Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium) to improve the consistency of safety data collection and interpretability of safety data analyses. RCTC 2.0 enabled comparisons of safety data across treatment groups, including grading. However, we discovered inaccuracies in laboratory results grading and omission of AE terms now recognized to occur in rheumatic disease clinical trials. The RCTC 2.0 performed as intended, although some inaccuracies and omissions were found. We provide a corrected version, RCTC 2.1, and also recommend further revision of the RCTC within OMERACT guidances to include AEs that have been reported in rheumatology clinical trials since RCTC 2.0 was published. Ideally, a revised RCTC 3.0 would not only facilitate standardized assessment and reporting of AEs, but would also expand and encourage accurate comparison of the safety profiles of treatments for rheumatic/autoimmune diseases.

Rheumatoid cervical pannus: feasibility of volume and perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast enhanced time resolved MRI

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to show disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis even in complex anatomic areas as the atlantodental region. To demonstrate the technical feasibility of measuring synovial volume and perfusion characteristics with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the atlantodental region in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ten patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cervical spine involvement underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine at 1.5 T. For each patient, 80 3D datasets were acquired using the commercialized Time Resolved Imaging of Contrast KineticS (TRICKS) sequence. Volumes of synovia with active synovitis on anatomical and parametric images were segmented. Synovial tissue perfusion parameters, namely plasma flow (Fp), relative plasma volume (vp), and the permeability-surface area product (PS), were calculated using a two-compartment uptake model. Statistical analysis included calculation of intra- and inter-reader agreement and a correlation of perfusion parameters with Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) criteria. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as well as quantification of volume and perfusion characteristics of synovia was successful in most patients (80%). Intra- and inter-reader agreement was excellent (0.89-0.99). There was a positive correlation between OMERACT score and the permeability-surface product. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a 4D angiography sequence for the atlantodental region in patients with rheumatoid arthritis for quantitative and qualitative assessment of synovial volume and perfusion characteristics is technically feasible.

Assessing Vasculitis in Giant Cell Arteritis by Ultrasound: Results of OMERACT Patient-based Reliability Exercises

To test the reliability of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) consensus-based ultrasound definitions for normal and vasculitic temporal and axillary arteries in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and in controls. A preliminary 1-day meeting and a full 3-day meeting fulfilling OMERACT Ultrasound Group guidelines were held. Temporal and axillary arteries were examined at 2 timepoints by 12 sonographers on 4 patients with GCA and 2 controls. The aim was to test inter- and intrareader reliability for normal findings, halo sign, and compression sign. In both meetings, patients had established GCA. Pathology was more recent in the full meeting, which was preceded by 6 h of training. Scanning time was 15-20 min instead of 10-13 min. In the preliminary exercise, interreader reliabilities were fair to moderate for the overall diagnosis of GCA (Light κ 0.29-0.51), and poor to fair for identifying vasculitis in the respective anatomical segments (Light κ 0.02-0.46). Intrareader reliabilities were moderate (Cohen κ 0.32-0.64). In the main exercise, interreader reliability was good to excellent (Light κ 0.76-0.86) for the overall diagnosis of GCA, and moderate to good (Light κ 0.46-0.71) for identifying vasculitis in the respective anatomical segments. Intrareader reliability was excellent for diagnosis of GCA (Cohen κ 0.91) and good (Cohen κ 0.71-0.80) for the anatomical segments. OMERACT-derived definitions of halo and compression signs of temporal and axillary arteries are reliable in recent-onset GCA if experienced sonographers (> 300 examinations) have 15-20 min for a standardized examination with prior training and apply > 15 MHz probes.

Atlas for the OMERACT thumb base osteoarthritis MRI scoring system (TOMS)

This paper presents an atlas for the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) thumb base osteoarthritis MRI scoring system (TOMS). The atlas includes reference images of each grade of...

Magnetic resonance imaging-assessed synovial and bone changes in hand and wrist joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Background/AimsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive and useful method for the detection of synovitis and joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, the patterns of MRI-detected bone erosion, bone marrow edema (BME), synovitis, and tenosynovitis have received insufficient attention. Therefore, this study evaluated the patterns of bone erosion, BME, synovitis, and tenosynovitis, and calculated the RA-MRI score (RAMRIS) of patients with RA at the carpal and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints using MRI.MethodsMRI datasets from 43 RA patients were analyzed. All patients had undergone MRI of one wrist. In addition, 36 patients had MCP joint images taken, and three had also received MRI of the contralateral wrist and MCP joints. The MR images were evaluated for bone erosion, BME, and synovitis in consensus by two blinded readers according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RAMRIS. The MRI-detected tenosynovitis was evaluated based on Haavardsholm’s tenosynovitis score.ResultsThe capitate, lunate, triquetrum, and hamate bones were the most common sites of erosion and BME and showed the highest RAMRIS erosion and BME scores. Moreover, MRI-detected tenosynovitis was present in 78.3% of all patients with RA, and the extensor compartment 4 and flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis were frequently affected.ConclusionsThis study identified the distribution and prevalence of MRI-detected bone erosion, BME, synovitis, and tenosynovitis of the wrist and MCP joints in RA patients. The patterns of the MRI-detected abnormalities may help to select sites for the application of MRI protocols in clinical trials and practice.

Frequency of inflammatory-like MR imaging findings in asymptomatic fingers of healthy volunteers.

To describe the frequency of inflammatory-like findings on MR imaging in asymptomatic volunteers and compare them with patients with known rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. MR images of fingers in 42 asymptomatic volunteers and 33 patients with rheumatoid/psoriatic arthritis were analyzed. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid/Psoriatic Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS/PsAMRIS) and tenosynovitis scoring system were used to assess: bone marrow edema (BME), erosions, tendon sheath fluid/tenosynovitis, joint effusion, and soft-tissue edema. Findings and scores were compared between volunteers and patients. Inter-reader agreement was calculated (intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC). In volunteers, tendon sheath fluid was very common in at least one location (42/42 volunteers for reader 1, 34/42 volunteers for reader 2). BME, erosions, joint effusion, and soft-tissue edema were absent (except one BME in the 3rd proximal phalanx for reader 1). Tendon sheath fluid scores in volunteers and tenosynovitis scores in patients were high (reader 1, 7.17 and 5.39; reader 2, 2.31 and 5.45). Overall, inter-reader agreement was substantial (ICC=0.696-0.844), except for tendon sheath fluid (ICC=0.258). Fluid in the finger flexor tendon sheaths may be a normal finding and without gadolinium administration should not be interpreted as tenosynovitis. Bone marrow edema, erosions, joint effusion, and soft-tissue edema in the fingers most likely reflect pathology if present.

Incorporating assessment of the cervical facet joints in the modified Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score is of additional value in the evaluation of spinal radiographic outcome in ankylosing spondylitis

BackgroundTo aim was to investigate the additional value of incorporating the de Vlam cervical facet joint score in the modified ankylosing spondylitis (AS) spine score (mSASSS) for the evaluation of spinal radiographic outcome in AS.MethodBaseline and 4-year radiographs from 98 consecutive patients from the Groningen Leeuwarden AS (GLAS) cohort, who had AS treated with TNF-α inhibitors, were scored by two readers; the vertebral bodies were assessed according to the mSASSS (0–72) and cervical facet joints (C2–C7) were assessed according to the method of de Vlam (0–15). The combined AS spine score (CASSS) was calculated as the sum of both total scores (range 0–87) and compared with the original mSASSS according to three aspects of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) filter: feasibility, discrimination, and truth.ResultsFeasibility: the CASSS was calculated in 91% of the patients. No additional radiographs were necessary and the assessment took only a few extra minutes. Discrimination: both scoring methods had excellent inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) status scores >0.99, progression scores 0.92). Incorporating the cervical facet joints did not result in an increase in measurement error. The CASSS detected more patients with definite damage (61% vs. 57%) and definite progression (55% vs. 48%). Truth: higher CASSS scores at baseline and higher progression scores were seen in 41 (46%) and 22 (25%) patients, respectively. Cervical rotation correlated better with cervical CASSS than with cervical mSASSS (Spearman’s rho = 0.68 vs. 0.59).ConclusionsThe CASSS is a relevant and easy modification of the mSASSS. It captures more patients with AS who have spinal radiographic damage and progression, which is of great additional value in the evaluation of radiographic outcome in this heterogeneous and overall slowly progressing disease.

Multimodal Diagnostic Approach to Monoarthritis of the Wrist

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate both the performance characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the differential diagnosis of monoarthritis of the wrist and the predictive ability of the 1987 American College of Reumatology (ACR) and 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria. Methods: The 29 patients with monoarthritis of the wrist retrospectively reviewed in this study underwent preoperative MRI with or without a white blood cell (WBC) scan. Their diagnoses were confirmed histologically after open synovectomy. Synovitis, bone erosion, and bone edema, as seen on MRI, were measured by 2 readers independently using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS) system. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate the cutoff differentiating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from other diseases. The optimized cutoff point for each parameter was determined using Youden index. Results: The areas under the ROC curves for the synovitis, bone erosion, and bone edema scores were 0.892, 0.853, and 0.752, respectively. The cutoff values of these scores to predict RA were 5, 48, and 19, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the 1987 ACR criteria were 50% and 92% and those of the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria were 60% and 75%. Conclusion: The OMERACT RAMRIS system provides a valuable tool to differentiate RA from tuberculosis and undifferentiated chronic monoarthritis in patients with wrist monoarthritis. A multimodal diagnostic approach using MRI, WBC scan, and histologic evaluation is recommended if the diagnosis cannot be established based on clinical, biochemical, and radiographic evaluations.

Identifying flares in rheumatoid arthritis: reliability and construct validation of the OMERACT RA Flare Core Domain Set

ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability of concurrent flare identification using 3 methods (patient, rheumatologist and Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 criteria), and construct validity of candidate items representing the Outcome Measures in...