(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)1. IntroductionExchange rates, which is simply the price of one currency in terms of another currency, are one of the key component of the macroeconomics discussions in the literature. If one want to understand why some currencies depreciate and others appreciate, the factors that cause the change in supply and demand of currencies must be investigated. These factors include various fundamentals such as real income, inflation rates, real interest rates, consumer preferences, and government trade policy. For example, Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) states that a country's currency will depreciate by an amount equal to the excess of domestic inflation over foreign inflation while Uncovered Interest Parity (UIP) suggests that the interest rate differentials change the exchange rates. Traditional Flow Approach, which is also called the balance-ofpayments view, states that exchange rate moves to keep the balance of payments in equilibrium under the assumption of no government interventions. On the other hand, nominal exchange rate fluctuations should reflect movements in a country's monetary fundamentals such as relative money, output, interest rates and prices, according to the Monetary Model of Exchange Rate Determination.One of the important debates centers on the international economics is the difficulty of predicting exchange rates by using monetary fundamentals such as money supplies, outputs, and interest rates. As stated above, some theories in the economic literature claim that the exchange rates might be determined by such fundamental variables. However, since Meese and Rogoff (1983), it has been considered that exchange rates are very difficult to predict using monetary fundamentals; in particular, a simple random walk without drift (RW), is found to produce better exchange rate forecasts than fundamental-based exchange rate models. In other words, fundamental variables do not help predict future changes in exchange ratesMeese and Rogoff's (1983) finding was a shock for economists since monetary fundamentals have long been considered key determinants of exchange rates. If their finding is true, then all exchange rate models based on the fundamentals are misleading. Therefore, large numbers of studies have attempted to refute Meese and Rogoff's findings and find positive results in favor of fundamentals-based models. One of the most well-known rebuttals to Meese and Rogoff's work is Mark's (1995) study. Mark concludes in his study that monetary fundamentals contain predictive power for exchange rate. He used the long horizon regression (or Error Correction Model (ECM)) derived from the VECM (Vector Error Correction Model). However, these two studies are not the only ones testing the predictive ability of exchange rate models. Several models such as the single equation linear models, single-equation ECM, multi-equation VECM models, time-varying parameter models, and panel models have been used in the literature in the attempt to predict exchange rates. Even though most of the authors are unable to document short-run exchange rate predictability, some of them find evidence of long horizon predictability. Nevertheless, the literature has remained pessimistic about the link between exchange rates and fundamentals.The main purpose of the study is to investigate the exchange rate predictability in Turkey by using the monetary fundamentals in the ECM. This study first examines the in-sample fit of the ECM model, and then evaluates the out-of sample forecast performance of the ECM against benchmark RW model. The fundamental value of exchange rate used in this study is obtained from Frankel-Bilson Monetary Model. The error correction term is constructed under the assumptions of zero/nonzero interest rate differentials and country specific money demand elasticities to satisfy the cointegration assumption between fundamentals and exchange rates. The in-sample analysis results present evidence that monetary fundamentals are useful to explain the long horizon changes in the logarithm of the exchange rates while the out-of sample analysis results suggest that whether the ECM or the RW explains the nature of exchange rate changes might be considered that time varying. …
Read full abstract