Research In Otolaryngology Research Articles

Adherence to Reporting Guidelines in Major Otolaryngology Publications.

The aim of this study is to determine the adherence rate to reporting guidelines in published otolaryngology research. We performed an evidence-based review of all original clinical research published in 2021 in five otolaryngology journals for adherence to the appropriate guideline for the study type by evaluating whether the corresponding reporting guideline was mentioned in the body of the published manuscript. There were 1140 original research articles included in this study. Most studies were observational, for which the STROBE reporting guidelines are recommended (n = 791, 70.3%). All studies had an average adherence rate of 16.8% (n = 192/1140). The STROBE adherence rate was 4.9%, with JAMA Otolaryngology having the highest proportion of observation studies using the STROBE guidelines (23/49, 46.9%). Reporting guidelines are important tools to use in presenting original research. The use of these guidelines varies in the otolaryngology literature and highlights the ongoing need to support research reproducibility and usefulness.

Vision-Based Assistance for Vocal Fold Identification in Laryngoscopy with Knowledge Distillation.

Laryngoscopy images play a vital role in merging computer vision and otorhinolaryngology research. However, limited studies offer laryngeal datasets for comparative evaluation. Hence, this study introduces a novel dataset focusing on vocal fold images. Additionally, we propose a lightweight network utilizing knowledge distillation, with our student model achieving around 98.4% accuracy-comparable to the original EfficientNetB1 while reducing model weights by up to 88%. We also present an AI-assisted smartphone solution, enabling a portable and intelligent laryngoscopy system that aids laryngoscopists in efficiently targeting vocal fold areas for observation and diagnosis. To sum up, our contribution includes a laryngeal image dataset and a compressed version of the efficient model, suitable for handheld laryngoscopy devices.

Enhancing paranasal sinus disease detection with AutoML: efficient AI development and evaluation via magnetic resonance imaging

PurposeArtificial intelligence (AI) in the form of automated machine learning (AutoML) offers a new potential breakthrough to overcome the barrier of entry for non-technically trained physicians. A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) for screening purposes using AutoML could be beneficial to ease the clinical burden in the radiological workflow for paranasal sinus diseases.MethodsThe main target of this work was the usage of automated evaluation of model performance and the feasibility of the Vertex AI image classification model on the Google Cloud AutoML platform to be trained to automatically classify the presence or absence of sinonasal disease. The dataset is a consensus labelled Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS-3) MRI head dataset by three specialised head and neck consultant radiologists. A total of 1313 unique non-TSE T2w MRI head sessions were used from the OASIS-3 repository.ResultsThe best-performing image classification model achieved a precision of 0.928. Demonstrating the feasibility and high performance of the Vertex AI image classification model to automatically detect the presence or absence of sinonasal disease on MRI.ConclusionAutoML allows for potential deployment to optimise diagnostic radiology workflows and lay the foundation for further AI research in radiology and otolaryngology. The usage of AutoML could serve as a formal requirement for a feasibility study.

Single-Case Experimental Designs and N-of-1 Trials—An Alternative to Randomized Clinical Trials for Clinical Research in Otorhinolaryngology

This Viewpoint explores the use of single-case experimental designs in otolaryngology research.

In Memoriam: Professor Jozef Zwislocki (1922–2018)

Biography of Jozef John Zwislocki (March 22, 1922 – May 14, 2018) – Polish-born American neuroscientist. Granted fellowship into the Acoustical Society of America, as well as membership to the United States National Academy of Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, American Association for the Advancement of Science, and Association for Research in Otolaryngology (among others). He worked at Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland, taught at the University of Basel, was on a research fellowship at Harvard University, and was member of the Syracuse University faculty. Owner of twelve patents.

Medical student otolaryngology research: Involvement, perceptions, motivations

ObjectiveOtolaryngology is a competitive specialty that emphasizes research. This study explored medical student involvement in otolaryngology research including training, productivity, perceptions and career goals. Study designCross-sectional survey. MethodsA 27 question multiple choice survey was generated using Qualtrics and posted on an otolaryngology forum (Otomatch) from 10/09/2022 to 12/11/2022. ResultsThirty fourth year medical students (MS4) applying to U.S. otolaryngology residency programs responded. Nearly all (26/30 = 86.7 %) believe there should be dedicated time to research in medical school. MS4 produced an average of 3.23 otolaryngology papers (± 3.13), 5.23 poster presentations (± 9.22) and 2.50 oral presentations (± 5.06). MS4 feel it is more important for physicians to read (mean 4.47 on a 5-point scale; ± 0.76) than to conduct research (3.03 ± 0.87) or to emphasize it in evaluating residency applicants (2.79 ± 0.96). Seventeen respondents (17/30 = 56.7 %) lack interest in continuing research after medical school. Twenty-eight MS4 were evenly split (14/30 = 46.7 %) between a research-heavy or traditional residency. Students felt pressure to publish in low-impact journals (3.93 ± 0.94) for career advancement. ConclusionAll respondents were involved in research yet the majority (16/30 = 53.3 %) eschew a research-heavy residency. Using research to evaluate success entices involvement for some who may not be interested. Pressure to publish may exacerbate ethical issues like inaccurately assigned authorship and deceptive reporting of publications. A decreased emphasis on research will enable students truly interested to continue without pressure to publish, leading to a potential increase in generalizable studies.

Identifying Core Journals in Otolaryngology: A Bibliometric Analysis.

As research in otolaryngology continues to expand rapidly, it is important to identify core journals to keep clinicians updated with the latest advances. This study is the first to characterize core journals in otolaryngology. Using h-index and impact factor (IF), the top 15 NLM-indexed otolaryngology journals were selected for analysis. The references from all articles published in these journals in one randomized quarter were compiled into a citation rank list, with the most cited journal ranked the highest. Citation zonal distribution analysis was conducted to identify the zonal distribution of otolaryngology journals. A total of 3150 journals containing 26876 articles were cited in otolaryngology literature in April-June 2019. Laryngoscope was the most cited journal containing 1762 citations. IF is significantly associated with the h-index for the top 10 otolaryngology journals (p = 0.032). Three core journal zones were identified, with Zone 1 containing 8 journals, Zone 2 containing 36 journals, and Zone 3 containing 189 journals. A linear relationship between the log journal rank for Zones 1-3 and a cumulative number of citations was found (R2 = 0.9948). Eight core journals for otolaryngology were identified: Laryngoscope, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Otology & Neurotology, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Head & Neck, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. In the face of rapidly evolving research and a multitude of journals, the high citation density within these core journals highlights their utility in updating busy clinicians. NA Laryngoscope, 133:3346-3352, 2023.

Turbinate surgery in pediatric patients: A worldwide survey

ObjectiveImpaired nasal breathing is a common condition among pediatric patients, being rhinitis the most common cause. In recent years, turbinate surgery, mainly turbinate radiofrequency ablation (TRA), has increased in popularity amongst pediatric otolaryngologists and rhinologists as a safe and useful technique to address turbinate hypertrophy in pediatric patients. The present paper is designed with the aim of assessing the current worldwide clinical practice regarding turbinate surgery in pediatric patients. MethodsThe questionnaire was developed based on previous researches, by a group of 12 experts from the rhinology and pediatric otolaryngology research group belonging to the Young Otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological societies (YO-IFOS). The survey was then translated to 7 languages and sent to 25 scientific otolaryngologic societies around the globe. Results15 scientific societies agreed to distribute the survey to their members. There were 678 responses from 51 countries. From them, 65% reported to usually perform turbinate surgery in pediatric patients. There was a statistically significant increased likelihood of performing turbinate surgery for those practicing rhinology, sleep medicine, and/or pediatric otolaryngology compared to other subspecialties. The main indication to perform turbinate surgery was nasal obstruction (93.20%); followed by sleep disordered breathing (53.28%), chronic rhinosinusitis (28.70%) and facial growth alterations (22.30%). ConclusionsThere is no general consensus on the indications and ideal technique for turbinate reduction in children. This dissension arises mainly from the lack of scientific evidence. The points with highest agreement (>75%) between respondents is the use of nasal steroids prior to surgery; reintroducing nasal steroids in allergic patients; and performing turbinate surgery as day-case surgery.

From pioneers to modern medicine: tracing the evolution of our understanding of the relationship between Eustachian tube dysfunction, alternobaric vertigo, and laryngopharyngeal reflux

Decades of research have been devoted to understanding the complicated connections between the ears, nose, throat, and stomach. Pioneers in the discipline of otolaryngology/ear, nose, and throat (ENT), James Yearsley (1805–1869) and Peter Allen (1826–1844), produced theories and concepts that allowed us to determine the relationship between these items. The current study has contributed to clarifying the complex relationship between Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD), alternobaric vertigo (ABV), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), and nasopharyngeal reflux (NPR). These interrelationships are required for guiding otolaryngology research and improving patient care. This article investigates the historical and contemporary links between ETD, ABV, and LPR. James Yearsley developed the concept of "stomach deafness" in 1843, suggesting a relationship between stomach issues and hearing loss. Peter Allen thought that ETD might be related to vertigo, especially "alternobaric vertigo," which happens when the air pressure changes in the labyrinth and affects the fluid in it. Recent investigations have shown that NPR or LPR can produce ETD and ABV by irritating and inflaming the Eustachian tube. For otolaryngology research to progress and patient care to improve, it is critical to understand both the historical and modern perspectives on these complex interactions.

A Brief History of JARO-An Origin Story!

We review the history of the creation of the Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology (JARO). We begin with the pre-history events that cover the initial concept, committee work and discussions that led the ARO to decide to publish its own journal. Finally, we provide a brief look at the initial stages of forming JARO.

Turbinate surgery in pediatric patients: A worldwide survey

ObjectiveImpaired nasal breathing is a common condition among pediatric patients, being rhinitis the most common cause. In recent years, turbinate surgery, mainly turbinate radiofrequency ablation (TRA), has increased in popularity amongst pediatric otolaryngologists and rhinologists as a safe and useful technique to address turbinate hypertrophy in pediatric patients. The present paper is designed with the aim of assessing the current worldwide clinical practice regarding turbinate surgery in pediatric patients. MethodsThe questionnaire was developed based on previous researches, by a group of 12 experts from the rhinology and pediatric otolaryngology research group belonging to the Young Otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological societies (YO-IFOS). The survey was then translated to 7 languages and sent to 25 scientific otolaryngologic societies around the globe. Results15 scientific societies agreed to distribute the survey to their members. There were 678 responses from 51 countries. From them, 65% reported to usually perform turbinate surgery in pediatric patients. There was a statistically significant increased likelihood of performing turbinate surgery for those practicing rhinology, sleep medicine, and/or pediatric otolaryngology compared to other subspecialties. The main indication to perform turbinate surgery was nasal obstruction (93.20%); followed by sleep disordered breathing (53.28%), chronic rhinosinusitis (28.70%) and facial growth alterations (22.30%). ConclusionsThere is no general consensus on the indications and ideal technique for turbinate reduction in children. This dissension arises mainly from the lack of scientific evidence. The points with highest agreement (>75%) between respondents is the use of nasal steroids prior to surgery; reintroducing nasal steroids in allergic patients; and performing turbinate surgery as day-case surgery.

Moving Forward After Gaining Hard-won Experience Through the COVID-19 Pandemic

This Viewpoint details the growth of otolaryngological research and improvements in patient treatments through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

0794 Understanding Barriers and Communication Behaviors Impacting Referral to Sleep Surgery: Qualitative Patient Perspectives

Abstract Introduction Shared decision-making is a process when patients, families, and clinicians work together to make optimal, personalized medical choices in the face of more than one reasonable treatment option. These interactions can influence the joint decision and may have lasting impressions for future healthcare encounters. Considering the American Academy of Sleep Medicine’s recent clinical practice guideline on the referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for surgical consultation, we aimed to understand patient experiences, in terms of barriers and communication behaviors in the referral process to sleep surgery consultation. Methods We performed a qualitative study consisting of in-depth semi-structured virtual interviews with adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥5 events per hour of sleep, scored by AASM-accredited standards) and who were recommended for sleep surgery at a tertiary Sleep Surgery Clinic. Open ended questions focused on patient experiences during healthcare encounters from diagnosis, trials with noninvasive management options and ultimate referral to sleep surgery. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis to identify themes. Results Ten adult patients with OSA who were evaluated in sleep surgery clinic were approached and enrolled from March through April 2021. Barriers to sleep surgery clinic included delays in OSA diagnosis due to limited OSA awareness and perceived inconvenience of sleep study, providers faulting patient for persistent sleep symptoms, patient-reported lack of urgency by providers in troubleshooting noninvasive management options, scheduling delays and waitlists, and cost. Patients were open to trialing noninvasive treatment options, though opportunities for reevaluation and shared decision-making may address unmet needs, as inadequate improvements led to frustration after multiple encounters. Patients appreciated providers who were empathetic and provided information sharing, in terms of transparent and understandable explanations. Conclusion This study focused on experiences of patients with OSA and barriers faced to reach sleep surgery consultation. Improved communication structure to discuss unresolved concerns and remaining management options, as well as vetted resources, would set the foundation for effective shared decision-making and timely referral for sleep surgery consultation. Support (If Any) Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Resident Research Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts (CORE). NIH T32 DC000018.

The impact of COVID-19 on otolaryngology research: a cross-sectional analysis of discontinued trials.

The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced the capacity to conduct medical research due to recruitment difficulties, supply chain shortages, and funding deficits. The clinical practice of otolaryngology was especially impacted due to a reduction in elective procedures, such as facial plastic surgeries and vocal fold injections. The primary objective was to examine the extent of clinical trial (CTs) disruption secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic in the field of otolaryngology. On August 1, 2021, we conducted a systematic search utilizing ClinicalTrials.gov for CTs related to common otolaryngology disorders. We utilized the date range January 1, 2020 through August 1, 2021 to identify all trials potentially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Investigators performed screening and data extraction in a duplicate, masked fashion. Trials resulting from the search were extracted for trial status, condition treated, enrollment number, funding, study type, study design, last update posted date, and trial location. Trials that explicitly mentioned COVID-19 as a reason for discontinuation or suspension were coded as such. For trials that did not explicitly mention COVID-19, we coded the reason provided from ClinicalTrials.gov. The Oklahoma State University Center for Health Science Institutional Review Board determined that this project did not qualify as human subject research. A total of 1,777 CTs met the inclusion criteria, and 223 CTs were discontinued between January 1, 2020 and August 1, 2021. Thirty-three (14.8%) of the 223 CTs reported discontinuation explicitly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 33 studies had 1,715 participants enrolled in total. Among the primary interventions, 11 (33.3%) were devices, 10 (30.3%) were drugs, 5 (15.2%) were behavioral, 4 (12.1%) were diagnostic tests, 1 (3.0%) was dietary, and 2 (6.1%) were labeled as "other." Regarding the CT location, 20 (60.6%) were conducted in the United States, and 13 (39.4%) were conducted internationally. Of the 33 CTs, 19 (57.6%) were suspended, 9 (27.3%) were terminated, and 5 (15.2%) were withdrawn. The overall most common reason for trial disruption was recruitment difficulties (24.2%). Median enrollment for discontinued trials due to COVID-19 was 37 (interquartile range [IQR], 19-71) and for other reasons was 6 (IQR, 0-27), for which the Mann-Whitney test showed a statistically significant difference between the two (z=-3.913, p<0.001). There were no significant associations between trial location, funding source, randomization, or whether a study involved masked vs unmasked participants. The COVID-19 pandemic has incited an impact on clinical research in the field of otolaryngology. To preserve trial continuation amid future threats to participant interaction and communication, we recommend further exploration of remote monitoring practices and virtual procedures-those that will maintain the effectiveness and accuracy needed to establish novel therapeutics. We encourage future trials to gauge which remote assessments show the greatest validity, with the long-term goal of establishing innovative study designs resilient to future pandemics.

Female Representation Among CORE Grant Recipients by Research Subspeciality.

This study evaluates the gender distribution of Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts (CORE) grants by research subspeciality over the past decade. Demographic information on CORE grant recipients from 2010 to 2019 was extracted through an Internet search, and research projects were categorized by subspeciality. Of 343 grants awarded during this period, 127 (37%) were awarded to women. Analysis demonstrated lower absolute rates of CORE funding for women in all fields except pediatrics, but women receive a proportional number of grants for most subspecialities based on their representation within the field.

Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts: Stepping-stones to Innovation and Equity in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

The Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts (CORE) grant program coordinates research funding initiatives across the subspecialties of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Modeled after National Institutes of Health study sections, CORE grant review processes provide comprehensive reviews of scientific proposals. The organizational structure and grant review process support grant-writing skills, attention to study design, and other components of academic maturation toward securing external grants from the National Institutes of Health or other agencies. As a learning community and a catalyst for scientific advances, CORE evaluates clinical, translational, basic science, and health services research. Amid the societal reckoning around long-standing social injustices and health inequities, an important question is to what extent CORE engenders diversity, equity, and inclusion for the otolaryngology workforce. This commentary explores CORE's track record as a stepping-stone for promoting equity and innovation in the specialty. Such insights can help maximize opportunities for cultivating diverse leaders across the career continuum.

Evaluating Strength of Evidence of Pediatric Otolaryngology Research Literature: A 20-Year Review.

Quantity and quality of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OTL-HNS) research are increasing, yet patterns within Pediatric OTL-HNS publications are unknown. This study examines trends in the level of evidence of pediatric OTL-HNS articles over a 20-year period to quantify the growth and characterize contributing factors. Review article. A retrospective review was conducted on 12 peer-reviewed OTL-HNS journals at three time-points: 1996, 2006, and 2016. Pediatric-specific OTL-HNS journals were selected; all were among the top 10 highest impact factor journals, with one pediatric-specific and one Canadian journal. Publication details, author characteristics, and study focus were collected. Papers were classified based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence by two independent reviewers. Of the 1,733 articles reviewed, 727 met inclusion criteria. A greater absolute number of pediatric OTL-HNS articles were published over the years studied: from 95 in 1996 to 359 in 2016 (P < .001). As well, the absolute number of high-quality studies has increased over the study period, from 28 articles in 1996 to 100 articles in 2016. However, the relative percentage of high-quality papers remained stable between 27.9% and 32.2% with an average of 29.7% (P=.89). Higher impact factor journals did not tend to publish higher-quality pediatric OTL-HNS articles (P=.48). Over the past 20 years, there is no appreciable improvement in the proportion of high-quality publications in pediatric OTL-HNS; however, there is an overall greater number of high-quality papers within OTL-HNS literature. These findings likely relate to challenges of research within pediatric surgical specialties. NA Laryngoscope, 132:1869-1876, 2022.

Putting the Pieces Together: the Hair Cell Transduction Complex.

Identification of the components of the mechanosensory transduction complex in hair cells has been a major research interest for many auditory and vestibular scientists and has attracted attention from outside the field. The past two decades have witnessed a number of significant advances with emergence of compelling evidence implicating at least a dozen distinct molecular components of the transduction machinery. Yet, how the pieces of this ensemble fit together and function in harmony to enable the senses of hearing and balance has not been clarified. The goal of this review is to summarize a 2021 symposium presented at the annual mid-winter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. The symposium brought together the latest insights from within and beyond the field to examine individual components of the transduction complex and how these elements interact at molecular, structural, and biophysical levels to gate mechanosensitive channels and initiate sensory transduction in the inner ear. The review includes a brief historical background to set the stage for topics to follow that focus on structure, properties, and interactions of proteins such as CDH23, PCDH15, LHFPL5, TMIE, TMC1/2, and CIB2/3. We aim to present the diversity of ideas in this field and highlight emerging theories and concepts. This review will not only provide readers with a deeper appreciation of the components of the transduction apparatus and how they function together, but also bring to light areas of broad agreement, areas of scientific controversy, and opportunities for future scientific discovery.

Supporting Equity and Inclusion of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Individuals in Professional Organizations.

Disability is an important and often overlooked component of diversity. Individuals with disabilities bring a rare perspective to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) because of their unique experiences approaching complex issues related to health and disability, navigating the healthcare system, creatively solving problems unfamiliar to many individuals without disabilities, managing time and resources that are limited by physical or mental constraints, and advocating for themselves and others in the disabled community. Yet, individuals with disabilities are underrepresented in STEMM. Professional organizations can address this underrepresentation by recruiting individuals with disabilities for leadership opportunities, easing financial burdens, providing equal access, fostering peer-mentor groups, and establishing a culture of equity and inclusion spanning all facets of diversity. We are a group of deaf and hard-of-hearing (D/HH) engineers, scientists, and clinicians, most of whom are active in clinical practice and/or auditory research. We have worked within our professional societies to improve access and inclusion for D/HH individuals and others with disabilities. We describe how different models of disability inform our understanding of disability as a form of diversity. We address heterogeneity within disabled communities, including intersectionality between disability and other forms of diversity. We highlight how the Association for Research in Otolaryngology has supported our efforts to reduce ableism and promote access and inclusion for D/HH individuals. We also discuss future directions and challenges. The tools and approaches discussed here can be applied by other professional organizations to include individuals with all forms of diversity in STEMM.

Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Office Laryngoscopy: A Scoping Review.

This scoping review aims to provide a broad overview of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to office laryngoscopy to identify gaps in knowledge and guide future research. Scoping Review. Searches for studies on AI and office laryngoscopy were conducted in five databases. Title and abstract and then full-text screening were performed. Primary research studies published in English of any date were included. Studies were summarized by: AI applications, targeted conditions, imaging modalities, author affiliations, and dataset characteristics. Studies focused on vocal fold vibration analysis (43%), lesion recognition (24%), and vocal fold movement determination (19%). The most frequently automated tasks were recognition of vocal fold nodules (19%), polyp (14%), paralysis (11%), paresis (8%), and cyst (7%). Imaging modalities included high-speed laryngeal videos (45%), stroboscopy (29%), and narrow band imaging endoscopy (7%). The body of literature was primarily authored by science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) specialists (76%) with only 30 studies (31%) involving co-authorship by STEM specialists and otolaryngologists. Datasets were mostly from single institution (84%) and most commonly originated from Germany (23%), USA (16%), Spain (9%), Italy (8%), and China (8%). Demographic information was only reported in 39 studies (40%), with age and sex being the most commonly reported, whereas race/ethnicity and gender were not reported in any studies. More interdisciplinary collaboration between STEM and otolaryngology research teams improved demographic reporting especially of race and ethnicity to ensure broad representation, and larger and more geographically diverse datasets will be crucial to future research on AI in office laryngoscopy. NA Laryngoscope, 132:1993-2016, 2022.