Otolaryngology Residency Programs Research Articles

An Analysis of Global Surgery Opportunities in American Otolaryngology Residency Programs.

To depict the current state of global surgery opportunities in United States ACGME-approved Otolaryngology residency programs and compare the characteristics of programs with and without these opportunities. In this cross-sectional analysis, websites of ACGME-accredited Otolaryngology residency programs were analyzed for information on program size, rank, age, and geographic region as obtained through the Doximity platform in 2023. Additional parameters were obtained for programs listing global surgery opportunities such as funding, faculty oversight, location/region, focus, and relationship to the community served. Data were tabulated and analyzed in Microsoft Excel and Stata. Of the 131 ACGME-accredited Otolaryngology residency programs, 26 (20%) of programs advertised a global surgery opportunity. Nine (35%) of these promoted funding, 15 (58%) offered a clinical focus, one (4%) offered a research focus, and 10 (38%) offered a combined approach. The Midwest region had the most programs with global surgery opportunities (n = 8, 31%). Less than half (42%) of programs had an established partnership with local partners within low and middle-income countries (LMICs). When comparing programs, the average Doximity rank, average program age, and average program size of programs that offered global surgery opportunities was significantly higher than those that did not (37.2 vs. 71.5, 54 vs. 41, 19.5 vs. 13.7; all p < 0.05). Approximately one-fifth of Otolaryngology training programs have a global surgery opportunity. Programs that offer these opportunities had a higher Doximity ranking, older program age, and a larger trainee cohort. These results highlight potential areas for expanding global surgery opportunities in academic institutions. N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

Medical Student Research Activity in Otolaryngology.

To investigate medical student research productivity by institutions associated with otolaryngology residency programs and identify correlates of productivity. Retrospective review. N/A. A systematic search for articles indexed on PubMed published by 116 programs from January 1, 2016 to February 28, 2021 was conducted. Primary outcomes were number of faculty publications, first-author medical student publications and medical students from each institution. Secondary outcomes included geographic region, number of otolaryngology faculty members, and program rankings. Nationally, the mean number of faculty per institution was 21.7 at the time of search. Over a 5-year period, there was a mean 98.7 total publications and 15.8 medical student first-author publications per institution consisting of a mean of 10.03 distinct medical students. One-way analysis of variance showed no statistically significant difference in medical student productivity (P = .09) or department size (P = .12) between regions. Number of medical student first-author publications positively correlated to number of faculty (R = .43, P < .05) and number of faculty publications (R = .63, P < .05). The top 30 programs ranked by United States News & World Report or National Institute of Health for funding had a statistically significantly greater mean number of medical student first-author publications and distinct medical student first authors than all other programs (P < .05). Greater numbers of faculty members likely provide more mentorship and opportunities that allow medical students to engage in projects that lead to first-author publications. These findings allow institutions to reflect on efforts in medical student engagement and provide data to students for career planning.

Deformity, etiology, solution, sequence (DESS): Facial analysis in rhinoplasty

PurposeRhinoplasty is amongst the most challenging surgeries to perfect and can take decades. This process begins during residency; however, residents often have limited exposure to rhinoplasty during their training and lack a standardized method for systematically analyzing and formulating a surgical plan. The DESS (Deformity, Etiology, Solution, Sequence) is a novel educational format for residents that serves to increase their pre-operative comfort with the surgical evaluation and intraoperative planning for a rhinoplasty. Materials and methodsA qualitative study performed at a tertiary academic institution with an otolaryngology residency program evaluating three consecutive residency classes comprised of four residents per class. A 9-item questionnaire was distributed to measure change in resident comfort after utilizing the DESS during their facial plastics rotation. Questionnaire responses highlighted resident comfort with facial nasal analysis, identifying deformities, suggesting surgical maneuvers, and synthesizing a comprehensive surgical plan. ResultsTen of the twelve residents surveyed responded. Of those that responded, comfort in facial nasal analysis, identification of common nasal deformities, surgical planning, and development of an overall surgical plan were significantly improved after completion of the facial plastic rotation. These residents largely attributed their success to the systematic educational format, with an average score of 4.8/5.0 (SD 0.42). ConclusionWhile rhinoplasty is a challenging artform to master, systematic approaches to analysis and operative planning are vital for teaching and guiding residents. Through this novel methodology, residents display significant improvement in their comfort with facial nasal analysis and overall surgical preparation.

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residents

PurposeSurgical residents are at high risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders which can impact surgical training and overall quality of life. We sought to assess musculoskeletal symptoms among current United States otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residents. We focused on the upper extremity given fine motor control for microsurgical procedures and increased keyboarding requirements. This study builds on previous research by evaluating setting attribution and attitudes toward ergonomics among otolaryngology residents. Materials and methodsA web-based, cross-sectional survey incorporating Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire and ergonomics-related questions was sent to otolaryngology residency program directors in September of 2021. Descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation, logistic regression, and comparison of proportions were utilized. ResultsOverall, 148 otolaryngology residents completed the survey; 70 were female (45 %), 83 male (54 %), and 1 non-binary (0.6 %). MSK symptoms were reported in the neck (77.0 %), lower back (45.5 %), and upper back (31.8 %) most frequently. Symptoms were work-related for 80 % of residents, with 84.7 % deemed operating-room-related. Some required treatment (14.5 %) or formal evaluation (11.0 %) of their injury. Injuries prevented residents from working (7.4 %), operating (9.5 %), and performing activities of daily living (27.0 %). Many reported they would use ergonomic equipment (94.2 %), dictation software (74.1 %), and scribes (81.3 %) if available. ConclusionsDespite increased surgical ergonomic awareness, musculoskeletal symptoms are still prevalent among otolaryngology residents. Nearly 1 in 9 residents required evaluation and treatment of their musculoskeletal symptoms, and one third reported lacking various ergonomic measures. Given the high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomic practices for O-HNS trainees should be emphasized by residency programs.

A Survey of Otolaryngology Residency Programs on Adapting to the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 Transitioning to Pass/Fail.

Objectives In February 2020, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) announced that the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 licensing examination would changefrom a numerical score to Pass/Fail (P/F). After implementation, many believe that USMLE-Step 2-Clinical Knowledge (CK) will become an important metric for students applying to otolaryngology (ENT). The purpose of this study is to determine factors important to resident selection after these changes. Methods A survey containing 15 questions related to resident selection practices and how changing USMLE Step 1 to P/F would impact future resident selection was designed. It was distributed to all ENT residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Results Forty percent of programs responded; 66% (95% confidence interval (CI): 51.1%-78.4%) felt that changing Step 1 scoring would not lead to students being more prepared for clinical rotations; 55% believe class rank will increase in significance (95% CI: 35.7%-64.3%). There was also an increase in the importance of Step 2 CK, which had a mean ranking of 10.67 prior to changes in Step 1 scoring and increased to 7.80 after P/F. Conclusions The changes in Step 1 scoring will likely lead to increasing importance of other objective measures like class rank or Step 2 CK. This may defeat the intended purpose put forth by the NBME. Therefore, further guidance on measures correlated with student performance as a resident will be integral to the selection process.

Training Program Factors Most Important to Women When Selecting an Otolaryngology Residency.

The aim of the study was to determine factors that female resident physicians find most influential when choosing an otolaryngology residency program. A three-part survey was sent to current female otolaryngology residents via email evaluating the importance of 19 characteristics impacting program choice. The 19 factors were scored from 1 (least important) to 5 (most important). The participants also ranked their personal top five most influential factors. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. One-hundred and fifty of 339 contacted residents participated. Most were aged 30-39 (63%), white (70%), and married (43%). Eighty-five percent had no children, and 52% did not plan to have children during residency. The highest scoring factors derived from Likert scale ratings included resident camaraderie (4.5 ± 0.8), resident happiness (4.4 ± 0.8), and case variety/number (4.4 ± 0.8). The lowest scoring factors were number of fellows (2.9 ± 1.1), attitudes toward maternity leave (2.7 ± 1.3), and maternity leave policies (2.4 ± 1.2). The top five most influential factors and the percentage selecting this were resident camaraderie (57%), resident happiness (57%), academic reputation (51%), case variety/number (47%), and early surgical/clinical experience (44%). Gender-specific factors were infrequently selected. However, 51 (34%) ranked at least one gender-specific factor within their top five list. Non-gender-related factors, like resident camaraderie and surgical experiences, were most valued by women. Conversely, gender-specific factors were less critical and infrequently ranked. Ninety-nine residents (64%) rated exclusively gender-neutral characteristics in their top five list of most influential factors. Our data offer insight into program characteristics most important to female otolaryngology residents, which may assist residency programs hoping to match female applicants. NA Laryngoscope, 134:600-606, 2024.

Trends in Twitter Utilization Among Academic Otolaryngologists.

To characterize Twitter utilization among academic otolaryngologists and evaluate the relationship between Twitter utilization and research productivity. Data were collected manually from accredited US otolaryngology residency programs from July-November 2021. Program and faculty demographics were documented, including citations and H-index for faculty and Doximity reputation and US News and World Report ranking for programs. Twitter metrics were also recorded. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of Twitter utilization. Currently, 333 (16%) faculty and 70 (62%) programs have a Twitter account. Of these, 36 (11%) and 27 (39%), respectively, were created in 2020. The regression model indicates that for each 5 unit increase in H-index, the odds of having a Twitter account increase 22% (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.34, p = 0.0009). The number of faculty with a Twitter account predicts the existence of program Twitter accounts (OR:1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.19, p = 0.04). Finally, of the 323 faculty with a Twitter account and available Scopus profile, we found that the number of individuals with Twitter use out of proportion to their academic productivity was low (n = 8/323). The H-index is a significant predictor of faculty Twitter accounts, whereas the number of faculty with Twitter is a significant predictor of program Twitter utilization. Although Twitter utilization is increasing, especially during the coronavirus pandemic, the findings indicate that there is ample room for growth, particularly amongst faculty with strong academic portfolios. NA Laryngoscope, 134:1190-1196, 2024.

Medical School Factors Associated With Students Entering Otolaryngology

To determine medical school characteristics that are associated with medical students entering otolaryngology residency programs. Cross-sectional study. Publically available data on otolaryngology residents and academic otolaryngology programs. Publicly available websites were used to collect demographic and bibliometric characteristics for 1527 residents in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited otolaryngology programs accounting for the 2017 to 2021 match periods. For each medical school, information on class size, number of otolaryngology faculty, presence of a home academic otolaryngology program, NIH research funding, presence of a student interest group, and top 10 ranking by Doximity or U.S. News and World Report (USNWR) were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed between the medical school factors and the percentage of each medical school class that matriculated into an otolaryngology residency program. On multivariate analysis, the following factors were found to be associated with a higher percentage of graduates entering an otolaryngology residency program: presence of a home academic otolaryngology program (standardized beta value (β) = 0.397, p < 0.0001), a 2021 top 10 ENT ranking according to USNWR (β = 0.206, p = 0.0028), and the average h-index of students from a medical school (β = 0.327, p < 0.0001). After controlling for multiple factors including research productivity, we found that the presence of a home academic program and a top 10 ranking on USNWR were associated with an increasing percentage of medical school graduates entering otolaryngology. NIH funding and the number of otolaryngology faculty were not associated with more students matriculating into an otolaryngology residency program. These findings can help guide medical schools and otolaryngology programs to recruit students into the field.

The Relative Citation Ratio: An Impartial Assessment of Productivity in Academic Otolaryngologists.

Quantification of academic productivity relies on bibliometric measurements, such as the Hirsch index (h-index). The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently developed the relative citation ratio (RCR), an article-level, citation-driven metric that compares researchers with others within their respective fields. Our study is the first to compare the usage of RCR in academic otolaryngology. Retrospective Database Review. Academic otolaryngology residency programs were identified using the 2022 Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. Demographic and training data were collected for surgeons using institutional websites. RCR was calculated using the NIH iCite tool, and h-index was calculated using Scopus. Mean RCR (m-RCR) is the average score of the author's articles. Weighted RCR (w-RCR) is the sum of all article scores. These derivatives are a measure of impact and output, respectively. The career duration of a physician was categorized into the following cohorts: 0-10, 11-20, 21-30, and 31+ years. A total of 1949 academic otolaryngologists were identified. Men had higher h-indices and w-RCRs than women (both p less than 0.001). m-RCR was not different between genders (p = 0.083). There was a difference in h-index and w-RCR (both p less than 0.001) among the career duration cohorts, but there was no difference in m-RCR among the cohorts (p = 0.416). The faculty rank professor was the greatest for all metrics (p < 0.001). Critics of the h-index argue that it is reflective of the time a researcher has spent in the field, instead of impact. The RCR may reduce historic bias against women and younger otolaryngologists. NA Laryngoscope, 134:592-599, 2024.

Medical student otolaryngology research: Involvement, perceptions, motivations

ObjectiveOtolaryngology is a competitive specialty that emphasizes research. This study explored medical student involvement in otolaryngology research including training, productivity, perceptions and career goals. Study designCross-sectional survey. MethodsA 27 question multiple choice survey was generated using Qualtrics and posted on an otolaryngology forum (Otomatch) from 10/09/2022 to 12/11/2022. ResultsThirty fourth year medical students (MS4) applying to U.S. otolaryngology residency programs responded. Nearly all (26/30 = 86.7 %) believe there should be dedicated time to research in medical school. MS4 produced an average of 3.23 otolaryngology papers (± 3.13), 5.23 poster presentations (± 9.22) and 2.50 oral presentations (± 5.06). MS4 feel it is more important for physicians to read (mean 4.47 on a 5-point scale; ± 0.76) than to conduct research (3.03 ± 0.87) or to emphasize it in evaluating residency applicants (2.79 ± 0.96). Seventeen respondents (17/30 = 56.7 %) lack interest in continuing research after medical school. Twenty-eight MS4 were evenly split (14/30 = 46.7 %) between a research-heavy or traditional residency. Students felt pressure to publish in low-impact journals (3.93 ± 0.94) for career advancement. ConclusionAll respondents were involved in research yet the majority (16/30 = 53.3 %) eschew a research-heavy residency. Using research to evaluate success entices involvement for some who may not be interested. Pressure to publish may exacerbate ethical issues like inaccurately assigned authorship and deceptive reporting of publications. A decreased emphasis on research will enable students truly interested to continue without pressure to publish, leading to a potential increase in generalizable studies.

International Medical Graduates in Otolaryngology Education: The Overlooked Path to Diversity and Inclusivity.

"International Medical Graduates" (IMGs) make up a large percentage of "underrepresented in medicine" physicians and comprise 25% of the US physician workforce. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, in its "Statement on Diversity," has expressed its enduring commitment to inclusion and diversity in all its forms. However, unlike various other specialties, a discussion about integration of IMGs in Otolaryngology has not been raised in our community. This commentary reviews the data on the recruitment of IMGs in Otolaryngology residency programs and highlights the need for a strategic effort to increase their participation in the US residency programs. Strong benefits may be derived from this effort such as promoting inclusivity and diversity of the workforce and increasing the support of the nation's underserved communities.

Otolaryngology residency program factors associated with female resident representation.

Female representation in the field of otolaryngology is lacking. Residency is the first point at which medical school graduates specialize in a chosen field and thus represents an opportunity to recruit and train more female otolaryngologists. This study sought to identify program factors associated with greater female representation among resident physicians. Departmental websites of all 124 otolaryngology residency programs in the United States and Puerto Rico were examined for a list of residents. For programs with a resident roster available, the genders of residents, faculty, program directors, and chairpersons were recorded. Location and city population for each program was also recorded, as was female resident representation. Programs were compared using Pearson Chi-squared univariate tests. 1,632 residents and 2,605 faculty were included in the analysis of 109 programs. The median female resident representation was 40%. Programs with larger faculty sizes, more female faculty, and urban location were associated with an above-median female resident representation. Programs with a larger residency cohort approached significance regarding above-median female resident representation. Higher female faculty representation, program director gender, chairperson gender, and US region were not associated with variation in female resident representation. Greater female otolaryngology residency representation was associated with programs having an urban location and greater numbers of female and total faculty. It was also likely that a larger resident cohort size may affect female resident representation. The proportions of female faculty, program director, and chairperson gender, as well as theUS region, were not associated with variation in female resident gender representation.

Etiology, Severity, Audiogram Type, and Device Usage in Patients with Unilateral Moderate to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Japan.

Few studies have reported on the etiology, severity, or device usage of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (UHL) compared to bilateral hearing loss. Therefore, this study investigated the characteristics of UHL in adults and children. We performed a survey using questionnaires for secondary and tertiary otolaryngology institutions. We included 15,981 patients (1549 children and 14,432 adults) from 196 institutions with otolaryngology residency programs and 2844 patients (336 children and 2508 adults) from 27 institutions with board members of the Japan Audiology Society. The latter submitted audiological data. Among children, most diagnoses were made at age 0. Approximately half of them had profound hearing loss, and 37 children (2.2%) used hearing devices. Among adults, the number of cases increased with age, but decreased when people reached their 80s and 90s. More than half of them had moderate hearing loss. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss was the most common cause of UHL of all ages; 4.4% of UHL patients used hearing devices, and most of the device users (98.6%) selected a conventional hearing aid. Hearing aid use is limited in children and adults with UHL in Japan. There could be many candidates with UHL for intervention such as a cochlear implant.

Development and Validation of a Laryngeal Microsurgery Simulation Training System for Otolaryngology Residents.

This study aims to create a synthetic laryngeal microsurgery simulation model and training program; to assess its face, content, and construct validity; and to review the available phonomicrosurgery simulation models in the literature. Nonrandomly assigned control study. Simulation training course for the otolaryngology residency program at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Resident (postgraduate year 1 [PGY1]/PGY2) and expert groups were recruited. A laryngeal microsurgery synthetic model was developed. Nine tasks were designed and assessed through a set of programmed exercises with increasing difficulty, to fulfill 5 surgical competencies. Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device sensors applied to the participants'hands measured time and movements. The activities were video-recorded and blindly assessed by 2laryngologists using a specific and global rating scale (SRSand GRS). A 5-point Likert survey assessing validity was completed by experts. Eighteen participants were recruited (14 residentsand 4 experts). Experts performed significantly better than residents in the SRS (p = .003), and GRS (p = .004). Internal consistency was demonstrated for the SRS (α = .972, p < .001). Experts had a shorter execution time (p = .007), and path length with the right hand (p = .04). The left hand did not show significant differences. The survey assessing validity resulted in a median 36 out of 40 points score for face validity; and 43 out of 45 points score, for global content validity. The literature review revealed 20 available phonomicrosurgery simulation models, only 6 with construct validity. The face, content, and construct validity of the laryngeal microsurgery simulation training programwere established. It could be replicated and incorporated into residents' curricula.

Assessing the competitiveness of medical humanities research on psychiatry, otolaryngology, and ophthalmology residency program applications

ABSTRACT Medical humanities research is an increasing area of interest for students as medical schools become more aware of the benefits of humanities and the arts on patient care. However, medical students may feel dissuaded from pursuing medical humanities work for fear of how it will be perceived on their residency applications. In this study, residency program directors (PDs) in New York state in psychiatry, ophthalmology, and otolaryngology were surveyed about their opinions on the competitiveness of students doing medical humanities research applying to their programs. Of the 64 PDs contacted, twenty submitted responses (31.3%). When asked if a residency applicant who only had medical humanities research experience would be seriously considered for their program, 95% of PDs said yes. Furthermore, 65% of PDs said that having medical humanities research experience in addition to clinical research increased a student’s chance of being accepted to their program. Thirty percent of PDs indicated that the medical humanities were an important selection criteria for their program. Qualitative responses emphasized that non-traditional projects, such as personal essays, were as valid as published journal articles when conducted with academic rigor. Many PDs also believed that the medical humanities increased compassion, empathy, and communication skills in their residents. Considering these results, medical students should feel empowered to pursue medical humanities research, even if they are applying into a competitive surgical specialty. It should not diminish their chances of being seriously considered for a program, and may even confer an advantage over their clinical research peers.

A paired curriculum for surgical faculty and residents on adult education.

IV.

Where Have All the Rhinoplasties Gone? A Call to Action for Academic Plastic Surgeons to Focus on Increasing Rhinoplasty Procedures Before It Is Too Late.

The armamentarium of a plastic surgeon is vast, consisting of an array of surgical procedures from head to toe. Unfortunately, plastic surgeons have been losing portions of their operative domain to other surgical subspecialties for years. The number of subspecialties invading our niche is bothersome, but more concerning is the fact that losing the reins of these core procedures results in less surgical exposure and competency for plastic surgery residents.Lately, in academic institutions, otolaryngologists seem to be performing most rhinoplasty procedures, resulting in fewer surgeries performed by plastic surgeons. Trainees must perform 10 rhinoplasties to fulfill graduation requirements but, more importantly, residents should graduate feeling competent and confident performing rhinoplasties. The aims of this study are to determine the number of rhinoplasties being performed at academic centers each year and to evaluate the trend with regard to which specialties are performing these procedures. Three academic institutions with plastic surgery and otolaryngology residency programs searched medical records for rhinoplasty Current Procedural Terminology codes from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. The total numbers of rhinoplasties performed each year, by each specialty, were tallied. Growth rate in rhinoplasty volume among participating institutions ranged from 27% to 149%. At these institutions, plastic surgeons performed less than one third of all rhinoplasties. In 2009, 10% of rhinoplasties were performed by plastic surgeons at institution 1, 22% at institution 2, and 18% at institution 3. In 2019, the volume of rhinoplasties performed by plastic surgeons was 5%, 12%, and 27%, respectively. The 3 ENT departments had statistically significant increasing trends in rhinoplasty volume. Institutions 1 and 2's plastic surgery departments showed that negative volume trends, however, were not statistically significant. Institution 3's plastic surgery department has had an increasing trend, which was statistically significant. Otolaryngology is performing most rhinoplasties at several academic institutions. This is concerning for the education of plastic surgery trainees. Academic plastic surgeons must focus on increasing the number of rhinoplasties performed to adequately train residents this core procedure. If rhinoplasties are not made a priority now, this surgery may become a historic operation instead of a vital skill in plastic surgeons' armamentarium.

Does Medical School Rank Impact Matching into Otolaryngology?

To describe how medical school rank may be associated with matriculation into otolaryngology residency programs. A list of medical students who matched into otolaryngology residencies in 2020, 2021, and 2022 was obtained from Otomatch (Otomatch.com). For each student, their medical school, U.S. News & World Report Best Medical School (Research) ranking, and region based on the U.S. Census divisions were recorded. The medical schools were divided into four Tiers according to rank: 1-40 (Tier 1), 41-80 (Tier 2), 81-124 (Tier 3), and 125-191 (Tier 4). Residency programs were also grouped by region, whether they were large (>3 residents/year) or small (<3 residents/year), and their Doximity reputation ranking: 1-31 (Tier 1), 32-61 (Tier 2), 62-91 (Tier 3), and 92-125 (Tier 4). Nine hundred and ninety-five medical students were included in this study. The majority of residency matriculants were MDs (N=988, 99.3%) who came from Tier 1 (N=410, 41.2%) or Tier 2 (N=313, 31.5%) medical schools. Those who attended higher-tier medical schools were more likely to match into higher-tier residency programs (p < 0.001). 57.8% (N=237) of the applicants who attended Tier 1 medical schools matriculated into a Tier 1 residency program, whereas only 24.7% (N=42) of the applicants from Tier 4 medical schools matriculated into a Tier 1 residency program. Applicants who attend top-tier medical schools represent significantly more residents at top-tier otolaryngology residency programs than those from lower tier medial schools. NA Laryngoscope, 133:3353-3357, 2023.

An Evaluation of Otolaryngology Residency Program Websites.

Otolaryngology remains one of the most competitive specialties to match into during the residency application process. Medical students often apply to many programs to increase their chances of matching into a residency program and rely on residency websites to gather information about the programs they apply to. The purpose of this study was to determine the comprehensiveness of the information on otolaryngology residency program websites. One hundred twenty-twopublicly available otolaryngology residency program websites were evaluated for the presence of 47 criteria. Size, geographic location, and affiliation with a Top 50 ranked hospital for ear, nose, and throat care, according to the US News and World Report, were determined for each program. Frequencies were calculated for each of the different residency website criteria and non-parametric comparisons were used to analyze the relationship between the location, size, and ranking of each program, and the comprehensiveness of the program website. An average of 19.1 items (SD: 6.6 items) out of the 47 searches were present on the otolaryngology residency program websites. More than 75% of the websites contained the following program features: facility descriptions, descriptions of didactics, and research requirements. A total of 89.3% of the websites had a current resident list, 87.7% of these websites had photos of their residents, and 86.9% had a program contact email. Otolaryngology residency programs affiliated with a Top ENT hospital had a higher average number of criteria satisfied (21.6 criteria) compared to those that were not affiliated (17.9 criteria). The inclusion of research selection criteria, call schedule/requirements, average Step 2 scores of matched residents, and social aspects of residency could improve otolaryngology residency applicant satisfaction with residency program websites. Updating otolaryngology residency websites will assist prospective applicants as they apply to a wide variety of residency programs.

Presence of Diversity and Inclusion Information on United States Otolaryngology Residency Program Websites.

Presence of Diversity and Inclusion Information on United States Otolaryngology Residency Program Websites.