Osteoporotic Proximal Femur Research Articles

Is there a femoral morphology at risk of a cervical or pertrochanteric fracture? Description and validation of the “Neck shaft ratio” and the “Intertrochanteric distal ratio” after analyzing a continuous cohort of 126 bilateral fractures of the proximal femur

BackgroundProximal femur fractures constitute a public health concern given their high frequency and the aging population. The frequency of a contralateral fracture occurring can reach up to 15% of cases. Certain historical or demographic factors constitute risk factors for refracture, but the type of fracture, either of the femoral neck (FN) or pertrochanteric (PT), cannot be predicted. The objectives of this retrospective study were: firstly, to analyze several anatomical markers in order to determine whether they predispose to a certain type of fracture in the event of contralateral refracture, and secondly, to determine the predictive power of these possible radiological markers for the type of contralateral fracture. HypothesisThe hypothesis was that the “Neck shaft ratio” (NSR) and the “Intertrochanteric distal ratio” (ITDR) made it possible to determine a proximal femoral morphology at risk of FN and/or PT fracture in the event of a second fracture. Material and methodsThis continuous retrospective single-center series from January 2011 to December 2019 of patients who presented with bilateral fractures of the proximal femurs was analyzed. Radiographs, taken after the first fracture, of the contralateral femur were studied. Morphological measurements previously described in the literature were carried out as well as the NSR (ratio of the medial cortical thicknesses of the femoral neck at its narrowest and basicervical level) and the ITDR (ratio of the medial diaphyseal cortical thicknesses at 5mm and 20mm from the distal portion of the lesser trochanter). One hundred and twenty-six patients were included: 46/126 (36.5%) had bilateral FN, 50/126 (39.7%) bilateral PT and 30/126 (23.8%) one of each. ResultsOnly NSR and ITDR were significant predictive measures for FN or PT fracture type [0.54±0.11 vs. 0.81±0.16 (p<0.0001) and 0. 85±0.1 vs. 0.68±0.1 (p<0.0001), respectively]. These two ratios had an excellent predictive value for the type of fracture occurring on the contralateral side [NSR: AUC ROC = 0.91 (95% CI; 0.86–0.96); ITDR: AUC ROC = 0.81 (95% CI; %, 0.74–0.89)]. The NSR had excellent intra- and inter-observer reproducibility with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.93 [95% CI: 0.86–0.97] and 0.91 [95% CI: 0.82–0.96] respectively, the same also applied for the ITDR with interclass correlation coefficient values of 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87–0.97] and 0.86 [95% CI: 0.73–0.93] respectively. DiscussionThe NSR and ITDR ratios offer a simple and reproducible means to predict a morphological predisposition to a certain fracture type, respectively an FN and PT on the side contralateral to an initial osteoporotic proximal femur fracture. A prospective cohort study would be useful in defining a possible prognostic nature on the occurrence and/or time until refracture. Level of evidenceIII; retrospective control case.

Micro-Structural and Biomechanical Evaluation of Bioresorbable and Conventional Bone Cements for Augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail

Osteoporotic proximal femur fractures are on the rise due to demographic change. The most dominant surgical treatment option for per/subtrochanteric fractures is cephalomedullary nailing. As it has been shown to increase primary stability, cement augmentation has become increasingly popular in the treatment of osteoporotic per/subtrochanteric femur fractures. The ultimate goal is to achieve stable osteosynthesis, allowing for rapid full weight-bearing to reduce possible postoperative complications. In recent years, bioresorbable bone cements have been developed and are now mainly used to fill bone voids. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability as well as the micro-structural behaviour of bioresorbable bone cements compared to conventional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-cements in a subtrochanteric femur fracture model. Biomechanical as well as micro-computed tomography morphology analysis revealed no significant differences in both bone cements, as they showed equal mechanical stability and tight interdigitation into the spongious bone of the femoral head. Given the positive risk/benefit ratio for bioresorbable bone cements, their utilisation should be evaluated in future clinical studies, making them a promising alternative to PMMA-bone cements.

A surgical procedure to deliver a triphasic calcium-based implant material to address local bone loss and strengthen an osteoporotic proximal femur: a case report

Bone loss associated with the systemic skeletal disease osteoporosis results in weakened or fragile bone, the most serious consequence of which is fracture. A 67-year-old post-menopausal Caucasian woman presented with a diagnosis of osteoporosis by FRAX and DXA and a history of a fragility hip fracture. The patient was classified according to the latest guidance document for treating patients with post-menopausal osteoporosis from the International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis. The patient was at very high risk for major osteoporotic fracture, including hip fracture. This case report describes the use of a minimally invasive surgical procedure to address bone loss in the proximal femur associated with osteoporosis. Local osteo-enhancement procedure (LOEP), a minimally invasive surgical procedure, was performed using a triphasic calcium-based implant material, AGN1. LOEP was carried out under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic navigation. The area of bone loss in the proximal femur, the enhancement site, was identified, debrided, and irrigated to prepare it for low-pressure filling with AGN1 implant material. The patient recovered from the procedure without incident and was discharged without activity limitations after an overnight stay. X-ray imaging and DXA scans were used to evaluate implant material resorption and replacement with bone over a 3.25-year follow up. A significant and sustained increase in femoral neck and total hip BMD was observed (pre vs 3.25 years post-procedure: 0.546 vs 1.031 gm/cm2 and 0.628 vs 0.96 gm/cm2, respectively), which corresponded to a change in the patient’s T-score from the osteoporosis range to normal. Based on the use of T-scores to measure the risk of fragility fractures, and acknowledging the well-published limitations of doing so, the hip fracture risk of this patient was reduced from very high to low. This case report documents the use of this minimally invasive, targeted procedure to address hip fragility fracture (the most serious issue in the systemic disease osteoporosis), with AGN1 implant material used to replace bone lost in the proximal femur.

Finite Element Evaluation of the Femoral Neck System as Prophylactic Fixation to Prevent Contralateral Hip Fractures.

Hip fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality for geriatric patients, and incidence is increasing as the population ages. Following a primary hip fracture, up to 20% may suffer a contralateral hip fracture within 5years despite fracture risk reduction measures, including fall prevention and osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment. The aim of this study is to assess whether insertion of the Femoral Neck System (Depuy Synthes, West Chester, PA) into the contralateral proximal femur may strengthen the bone and decrease the incidence of contralateral hip fractures. ScanIP, an image processing software was used to produce 3-dimensional models of a cadaver femur with the implanted device. Models were meshed and exported to Abaqus for finite element analysis to evaluate the device's ability to reduce stress in the proximal femur. Results were analyzed for element-wise volume and von-Mises stresses. The implant reduced peak stress and bone failure at all levels of bone quality. Specifically in osteoporotic bone, the implant decreased peak stress by 27%, proximal femur trabecular bone failure by 5% and cortical bone failure by 100% in the femoral neck. Our results from computer generated finite element analyses indicate that the Femoral Neck System may strengthen an osteoporotic proximal femur in the event of a lateral fall. Further investigation with expanded finite element analysis and cadaveric biomechanical studies are needed to validate these results.

Accuracy of guide wire placement for femoral neck stabilization using 3D printed drill guides

BackgroundThe goal of stabilization of the femoral neck is to limit morbidity and mortality from fracture. Of three potential methods of fixation, (three percutaneous screws, the Synthes Femoral Neck System, and a dynamic hip screw), each requires guide wire positioning of the implant(s) in the femoral neck and head. Consistent and accurate positioning of these systems is paramount to reduce surgical times, stabilize fractures effectively, and reduce complications. To help expedite surgery and achieve ideal implant positioning in the geriatric population, we have developed and validated a surgical planning methodology using 3D modelling and printing technology.MethodsUsing image processing software, 3D surgical models were generated placing guide wires in a virtual model of an osteoporotic proximal femur sawbone. Three unique drill guides were created to achieve the optimal position for implant placement for each of the three different implant systems, and the guides were 3D printed. Subsequently, a trauma fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon used the 3D printed guides to position 2.8 mm diameter drill bit tipped guide wires into five osteoporotic sawbones for each of the three systems (fifteen sawbones total). Computed Tomography (CT) scans were then taken of each of the sawbones with the implants in place. 3D model renderings of the CT scans were created using image processing techniques and the displacement and angular deviations at guide wire entry to the optimal sawbone model were measured.ResultsAcross all three percutaneous screw guide wires, the average displacement was 3.19 ± 0.12 mm and the average angular deviation was 4.10 ± 0.17o. The Femoral Neck System guide wires had an average displacement of 1.59 ± 0.18 mm and average angular deviation of 2.81 ± 0.64o. The Dynamic Hip Screw had an average displacement of 1.03 ± 0.19 mm and average angular deviation of 2.59 ± 0.39o.ConclusionThe use of custom 3D printed drill guides to assist with the positioning of guide wires proved to be accurate for each of the three types of surgical strategies. Guides which are used to place more than 1 guide wire may have lower positional accuracy, as the guide may shift during multiple wire insertions. We believe that personalized point of care drill guides provide an accurate intraoperative method for positioning implants into the femoral neck.

Osteo-enhancement procedures in hip fracture prevention: definition and local interventions

Fragility hip fractures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in elderly patients and place a large medical and economic burden on affected individuals, families, and healthcare systems. Furthermore, in patients with a recent hip fracture, the risk of a second contralateral hip fracture is doubled at 1 year, and increases to 9–20% after 5 years. Mortality can be up to three times higher following a contralateral hip fracture. Currently available pharmaceutical treatments to improve bone mineral density in fragility fracture of the proximal femur can take up to 18 months to significantly reduce the risk of fracture, and have patient compliance issues. Thus, given the limitations of existing methods, there is a significant need for new approaches to reduce hip fractures through so-called surgical osteo-enhancement. “Osteo-enhancement” might be defined as any procedure in which a new material is surgically introduced with the aim of strengthening the proximal femur, increasing the resistance of the femoral neck to compression and distraction forces acting on it, and thereby preventing fall-related fractures. In the past decade, several groups have presented various prophylactic augmentation approaches for the osteoporotic proximal femur and evaluated them by means of experimental biomechanical testing; however, none of them met the ideal requirements for in vivo application. Ideally, a surgical procedure should be minimally invasive and safe. The intervention must not increase the immediate risk of hip fracture, must provide long-term fracture risk reduction, and, if a subsequent fracture does occur, the intervention should not interfere with a standard approach for fracture repair. More recently, to address local osteoporotic bone loss, a resorbable implant material named AGN1 was introduced as a new device for strengthening the proximal femur. The implant material sets in situ and is designed to be resorbed and replaced with new bone to improve femoral strength and reduce hip fracture risk in osteoporotic patients.

Finite Element Analysis of Cannulated Screws as Prophylactic Intervention of Hip Fractures.

IntroductionThe frequency of hip fractures, a major cause of morbidity and mortality for geriatric patients, is expected to increase exponentially in the next few decades. The aim of this study is to assess the ability of stainless-steel cannulated screws to reduce the risk of a femoral neck fracture, if placed prophylactically prior to a fall.Materials and MethodsWe created finite element models from computed tomography (CT) scan-based 3D models of a geriatric patient through 3D-image processing and model generation software. We used linear finite element simulations to analyze the effect of cannulated screws in the proximal femur in single-leg stance and lateral fall, which were processed for peak von Mises stresses and element failure.FindingsProphylactically placed cannulated screws significantly reduced failure in an osteoporotic proximal femur undergoing lateral fall. Three implanted screws in an inverted triangle formation decreased proximal femoral trabecular failure by 21% and cortical failure by 5%. This reduction in failure was achieved with a 55% decrease in femoral neck failure and 14% in lateral cortex failure.ConclusionOur results indicate that cannulated hip screws in an inverted triangle formation may strengthen an osteoporotic proximal femur in the event of a lateral fall. Mechanical testing on cadaveric or composite models is required to validate these results.

Discrete particle model for cement infiltration within open-cell structures: Prevention of osteoporotic fracture.

This paper proposes a discrete particle model based on the random-walk theory for simulating cement infiltration within open-cell structures to prevent osteoporotic proximal femur fractures. Model parameters consider the cement viscosity (high and low) and the desired direction of injection (vertical and diagonal). In vitro and in silico characterizations of augmented open-cell structures validated the computational model and quantified the improved mechanical properties (Young’s modulus) of the augmented specimens.The cement injection pattern was successfully predicted in all the simulated cases. All the augmented specimens exhibited enhanced mechanical properties computationally and experimentally (maximum improvements of 237.95 ± 12.91% and 246.85 ± 35.57%, respectively). The open-cell structures with high porosity fraction showed a considerable increase in mechanical properties. Cement augmentation in low porosity fraction specimens resulted in a lesser increase in mechanical properties. The results suggest that the proposed discrete particle model is adequate for use as a femoroplasty planning framework.

3-T MR Imaging of Proximal Femur Microarchitecture in Subjects with and without Fragility Fracture and Nonosteoporotic Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density.

Purpose To determine if 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture can allow discrimination of subjects with and without fragility fracture who do not have osteoporotic proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD). Materials and Methods Sixty postmenopausal women (30 with and 30 without fragility fracture) who had BMD T scores of greater than -2.5 in the hip were recruited. All subjects underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to assess BMD and 3-T MR imaging of the same hip to assess bone microarchitecture. World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores were also computed. We used the Mann-Whitney test, receiver operating characteristics analyses, and Spearman correlation estimates to assess differences between groups, discriminatory ability with parameters, and correlations among BMD, microarchitecture, and FRAX scores. Results Patients with versus without fracture showed a lower trabecular plate-to-rod ratio (median, 2.41 vs 4.53, respectively), lower trabecular plate width (0.556 mm vs 0.630 mm, respectively), and lower trabecular thickness (0.114 mm vs 0.126 mm) within the femoral neck, and higher trabecular rod disruption (43.5 vs 19.0, respectively), higher trabecular separation (0.378 mm vs 0.323 mm, respectively), and lower trabecular number (0.158 vs 0.192, respectively), lower trabecular connectivity (0.015 vs 0.027, respectively) and lower trabecular plate-to-rod ratio (6.38 vs 8.09, respectively) in the greater trochanter (P < .05 for all). Trabecular plate-to-rod ratio, plate width, and thickness within the femoral neck (areas under the curve [AUCs], 0.654-0.683) and trabecular rod disruption, number, connectivity, plate-to-rod ratio, and separation within the greater trochanter (AUCs, 0.662-0.694) allowed discrimination of patients with fracture from control subjects. Femoral neck, total hip, and spine BMD did not differ between and did not allow discrimination between groups. FRAX scores including and not including BMD allowed discrimination between groups (AUCs, 0.681-0.773). Two-factor models (one MR imaging microarchitectural parameter plus a FRAX score without BMD) allowed discrimination between groups (AUCs, 0.702-0.806). There were no linear correlations between BMD and microarchitectural parameters (Spearman ρ, -0.198 to 0.196). Conclusion 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture allows discrimination between subjects with and without fragility fracture who have BMD T scores of greater than -2.5 and may provide different information about bone quality than that provided by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. © RSNA, 2018.

New approaches for cement-based prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur provide enhanced reinforcement as predicted by non-linear finite element simulations

BackgroundHigh incidence and increased mortality related to secondary, contralateral proximal femoral fractures may justify invasive prophylactic augmentation that reinforces the osteoporotic proximal femur to reduce fracture risk. Bone cement-based approaches (femoroplasty) may deliver the required strengthening effect; however, the significant variation in the results of previous studies calls for a systematic analysis and optimization of this method. Our hypothesis was that efficient generalized augmentation strategies can be identified via computational optimization. MethodsThis study investigated, by means of finite element analysis, the effect of cement location and volume on the biomechanical properties of fifteen proximal femora in sideways fall. Novel cement cloud locations were developed using the principles of bone remodeling and compared to the “single central” location that was previously reported to be optimal. FindingsThe new augmentation strategies provided significantly greater biomechanical benefits compared to the “single central” cement location. Augmenting with approximately 12ml of cement in the newly identified location achieved increases of 11% in stiffness, 64% in yield force, 156% in yield energy and 59% in maximum force, on average, compared to the non-augmented state. The weaker bones experienced a greater biomechanical benefit from augmentation than stronger bones. The effect of cement volume on the biomechanical properties was approximately linear. Results of the “single central” model showed good agreement with previous experimental studies. InterpretationThese findings indicate enhanced potential of cement-based prophylactic augmentation using the newly developed cementing strategy. Future studies should determine the required level of strengthening and confirm these numerical results experimentally.

Nonlinear quasi-static finite element simulations predict in vitro strength of human proximal femora assessed in a dynamic sideways fall setup

Osteoporotic proximal femur fractures are caused by low energy trauma, typically when falling on the hip from standing height. Finite element simulations, widely used to predict the fracture load of femora in fall, usually include neither mass-related inertial effects, nor the viscous part of bone׳s material behavior. The aim of this study was to elucidate if quasi-static non-linear homogenized finite element analyses can predict in vitro mechanical properties of proximal femora assessed in dynamic drop tower experiments. The case-specific numerical models of 13 femora predicted the strength (R2=0.84, SEE=540N, 16.2%), stiffness (R2=0.82, SEE=233N/mm, 18.0%) and fracture energy (R2=0.72, SEE=3.85J, 39.6%); and provided fair qualitative matches with the fracture patterns. The influence of material anisotropy was negligible for all predictions. These results suggest that quasi-static homogenized finite element analysis may be used to predict mechanical properties of proximal femora in the dynamic sideways fall situation.

Biomechanics of implant augmentation

The rising incidence of osteoporotic fractures requires novel treatment strategies. Implant augmentation with bone cement is considered to be a promising approach but the benefits and risks need to be carefully evaluated. Experimental investigation of the biomechanical potential and the associated risks with special reference to the osteoporotic proximal femur and proximal humerus. Even small amounts of bone cement (3 ml) applied to the proximal femur in combination with intramedullary nailing led to more than a 50% increase in the number of test cycles before failure. The heat and pressure generated in the bone did not exceed critical thresholds. Short to midterm effects of subchondral cement placement on the adjacent cartilage can be excluded. The risk for cement leakage needs to be considered. Implant augmentation offers high biomechanical potential to prevent mechanical complications after fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Early and confident mobilization of elderly patients therefore appears to be possible. With appropriate handling, associated risks seem controllable; however, implant augmentation cannot be applied as a routine concept for osteoporotic fracture management. The application requires careful evaluation on a case by case basis under comprehensive consideration of mechanical and biological factors.

Is the rotation of the femural head a potential initiation for cutting out? A theoretical and experimental approach

BackgroundSince cut-out still remains one of the major clinical challenges in the field of osteoporotic proximal femur fractures, remarkable developments have been made in improving treatment concepts. However, the mechanics of these complications have not been fully understood.We hypothesize using the experimental data and a theoretical model that a previous rotation of the femoral head due to de-central implant positioning can initiate a cut-out.MethodsIn this investigation we analysed our experimental data using two common screws (DHS/Gamma 3) and helical blades (PFN A/TFN) for the fixation of femur fractures in a simple theoretical model applying typical gait pattern on de-central positioned implants. In previous tests during a forced implant rotation by a biomechanical testing machine in a human femoral head the two screws showed failure symptoms (2-6Nm) at the same magnitude as torques acting in the hip during daily activities with de-central implant positioning, while the helical blades showed a better stability (10-20Nm).To calculate the torque of the head around the implant only the force and the leverarm is needed (N [Nm] = F [N] * × [m]). The force F is a product of the mass M [kg] multiplied by the acceleration g [m/s2]. The leverarm is the distance between the center of the head of femur and the implant center on a horizontal line.ResultsUsing 50% of 75 kg body weight a torque of 0.37Nm for the 1 mm decentralized position and 1.1Nm for the 3 mm decentralized position of the implant was calculated. At 250% BW, appropriate to a normal step, torques of 1.8Nm (1 mm) and 5.5Nm (3 mm) have been calculated.Comparing of the experimental and theoretical results shows that both screws fail in the same magnitude as torques occur in a more than 3 mm de-central positioned implant.ConclusionWe conclude the center-center position in the head of femur of any kind of lag screw or blade is to be achieved to minimize rotation of the femoral head and to prevent further mechanical complications.

Fracture prevention by femoroplasty—cement augmentation of the proximal femur

The prevention of hip fractures is a desirable goal to reduce morbidity, mortality, and socio-economic burden. We evaluated the influence on femoral strength of different clinically applicable cementing techniques as "femoroplasty." Twenty-eight human cadaveric femora were augmented by means of four clinically applicable percutaneous cementing techniques and then tested biomechanically against their native contralateral control to determine fracture strength in an established biomechanical model mimicking a fall on the greater trochanter. The energy applied until fracture could be significantly increased by two of the methods by 160% (53.1 Nm vs. 20.4 Nm, p < 0.001) and 164% (47.1 Nm vs. 17.8 Nm, p = 0.008), respectively. The peak load to failure was significantly increased by three of the methods by 23% (3818.3 N vs. 3095.7 N, p = 0.003), 35% (3698.4 N vs. 2737.5 N, p = 0.007), and 12% (3056.8 N vs. 2742.8 N, p = 0.005), respectively. The femora augmented with cemented double drill holes had a lower fracture strength than the single drilled ones. Experimental femoroplasty is a technically feasible procedure for the prophylactic reinforcement of the osteoporotic proximal femur and, hence, could be an auxiliary treatment option to protect the proximal femur against osteoporotic fractures.

The Effect of Cement Placement on Augmentation of the Osteoporotic Proximal Femur

Femoroplasty, the augmentation of the proximal femur, has been shown in biomechanical studies to increase the energy required to produce a fracture and therefore may reduce the risk of such injuries. The purpose of our study was to test the hypotheses that: (1) 15 mL of cement was sufficient to mechanically augment the proximal femur, (2) there was no difference in augmentation effect between cement placement in the intertrochanteric region and in the femoral neck, and (3) cement placement in the femoral neck would predispose the proximal femur to an intertrochanteric fracture, whereas trochanteric placement would result in subtrochanteric fractures. In each of 18 pairs of osteoporotic human cadaveric femora, 15 mL of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement was injected into the trochanteric or femoral neck region of 1 femur, and the noninjected femur was used as the control. The augmentation effect of femoroplasty was evaluated under simulated fall conditions using a materials testing machine. Multiple linear regressions incorporating random effects were used to check for associations between covariates (bone mineral density, cement location, and treatment) and the parameters of interest (stiffness, yield energy, yield load, ultimate load, and ultimate energy). Significance was set at P < .05. It was found that femoroplasty with 15 mL of cement did not significantly increase stiffness, yield energy, yield load, ultimate load, or ultimate energy relative to paired controls. There were no significant differences in parameters of interest or fracture patterns in specimens augmented in the femoral neck versus the trochanter. It was concluded that 15 mL of cement was not sufficient to augment the proximal femur and that there was no biomechanical advantage to the placement of cement within the femoral neck versus the trochanter.

Elevada morbimortalidade e reduzida taxa de diagnóstico de osteoporose em idosos com fratura de fêmur proximal na cidade de São Paulo

To know the morbid-mortality following an osteoporotic hip fracture in elderly patients living in São Paulo. This study evaluated prospectively all patient over 60 years admitted in 2 school-hospitals in the city of São Paulo in a following 6-month period due to a osteoporotic proximal femur fracture. All of them filled up the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and had their chart reviewed. After 6 months they were re-interviewed. Linear regression analysis was utilized to determine the factors related to functional ability. 56 patients were included (mean age 80.7 +/- 7.9 years old, 80.4% females). After the 6-month follow up the mortality rate was 23.2%. Only 30% of the patients returned to their previous activities, and 11.6% became totally dependent. Factors related to worse functional ability after fracture were HAQ before fracture, institutionalization after fracture and age (r(2) 0.482). The diagnosis of osteoporosis was informed only by 13.9% of them, and just 11.6% received any treatment for that. Our results showed the great impact of these fractures on mortality and in the functional ability of these patients. Nevertheless, many of our physicians do not inform the patients about the diagnosis of osteoporosis and, consequently, the treatment of this condition is jeopardized.

A new technique for cement augmentation of the sliding hip screw in proximal femur fractures

Fractures of the osteoporotic proximal femur are a significant source of mortality and morbidity in today's ageing population. Even with modern fixation techniques such as the sliding hip screw, a certain percentage of fixations will fail due to cut-out of the screw. This study presents a new method for augmenting hip screws with cement to reinforce the fixation. Unstable pertrochanteric fractures were created in paired osteoporotic cadaver femora (n=10). The fractures were fixed using either standard fixation techniques (dynamic hip screw), or using a dynamic hip screw augmented with cement. Cement was introduced using a customised jig to guide cement into a region superior to the screw in the femoral head. Cut-out resistance was assessed using a biaxial material testing machine, with loading applied in compression until failure. The new cement augmentation technique significantly improved the cut-out strength of the fixation (mean 42%; P=0.032). The failure mechanism for both groups was the same, with failure occurring through compression of the cancellous bone superior to the screw. The mean increase in temperature at the femoral neck was 3.7 degrees C in augmented bones, which is much lower than values previously reported for polymethylmethacrylate cements. Several benefits with this technique have emerged. The method is technically straightforward. The risk of cement penetration into the joint is reduced, and cement is targetted to the areas of the femoral head where it is most needed. The exothermic reaction is minimised by reducing the volume of cement used. The first clinical results are promising.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures

A biomechanical investigation on eight pairs of human cadaver proximal femurs was performed to evaluate the impact of a new augmentation method on the internal fixation of osteoporotic proximal femur fractures. The study focused on enhancing implant purchase to reduce the incidence of implant cut-out in osteoporotic bone. In a left-right comparison, a conventional hip screw fixation (control) was compared to the new cement augmentation method. After bone bed preparation through high pressure irrigation to remove fat, blood, and bone debris, the bones were augmented with low viscosity polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. Step-wise fatigue testing was performed by cyclically loading the femoral heads in a physiological manner, beginning at 1,500 N and increasing 500 N every 5,000 cycles to 4,000 N, and continuously monitoring head displacement. Failure was defined as >5.0 mm head displacement. The head displacement at 2,000 N was significantly smaller (p=0.018) for the augmented group as compared to the conventionally treated bones (0.09+/-0.01 mm vs. 0.90+/-0.32 mm; mean+/-SEM). The displacement rate at the second load step was significantly higher (p=0.018) for the conventionally treated bones as compared to the augmented ones. All of the nonaugmented specimens failed during testing, where 50% of the augmented specimens did not fail. The promising results of these experiments suggest that this new standardized irrigation/augmentation method enhances the implant anchorage and offers a potential solution to the problem of implant cut-out in osteoporotic metaphyseal bone.

Comparison of micro-level and continuum-level voxel models of the proximal femur

Continuum-level finite element (FE) models became standard computational tools for the evaluation of bone mechanical behavior from in vivo computed tomography scans. Such scans do not account for the anisotropy of the bone. Instead, local mechanical properties in the continuum-level FE models are assumed isotropic and are derived from bone density, using statistical relationships. Micro-FE models, on the other hand, incorporate the anisotropic structure in detail. This study aimed to quantify the effects of assumed isotropy, by comparing continuum-level voxel models of a healthy and a severely osteoporotic proximal femur with recently analyzed micro-FE models of the same bones. The micro-model element size was coarsened to generate continuum FE models with two different element sizes (0.64 and 3.04 mm) and two different density–modulus relationships found in the literature for wet and ash density. All FE models were subjected to the same boundary conditions that simulated a fall to the side, and the stress and strain distributions, model stiffness and yield load were compared. The results indicated that the stress and strain distributions could be reproduced well with the continuum models. The smallest differences between the continuum-level model and micro-level model predictions of the stiffness and yield load were obtained with the coarsest element size. Better results were obtained for both continuum-element sizes when isotropic moduli were based on ash density rather than wet density.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures – a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties

Over a 2-year period, 244 patients underwent hemiarthroplasty for a displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture. Seventy patients had a cementless Austin-Moore prosthesis (AMP) inserted and 174 patients were treated using a cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasty. All the AMPs were inserted by or under the supervision of an orthopaedic consultant. Five patients (7%) from the AMP group sustained a periprosthetic femoral fracture. Two were iatrogenic and three occurred postoperatively after a simple fall. The fractures occurred proximally around the prosthesis (Johansson type I). Four required revision surgery. There were no periprosthetic femoral fractures in the Thompson group. When compared to the cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasties, the number of periprosthetic femoral fractures was significantly greater with the AMP. Patients in the AMP group were significantly older, although there was no significant difference in ASA grade between the two groups. There was no significant difference in age or gender between those who sustained a periprosthetic fracture and those who did not. These findings suggest that due to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture, cemented hemiarthroplasty is preferable. Furthermore, with modern cementing techniques, elderly frail patients appear to tolerate bone cement, which may serve to reinforce an osteoporotic proximal femur.