Orthopedic Group Research Articles

Lack of Diagnostic Value from Fungal and Mycobacterial Cultures in Cases of Suspected Prosthetic Joint Infection

Abstract Introduction/Objective Infections of prosthetic joints cause significant morbidity and often result in removal of the infected joint. In many cases, an infectious etiology can be difficult to definitively identify. As a result, providers suspecting prosthetic joint infections (PJI) often place large order sets of microbiology tests, including fungal and mycobacterial cultures. Fungal and mycobacterial cultures are labor-intensive for the laboratory taking up to 28 days and 42 days, respectively, to complete. As a potential area for a diagnostic stewardship intervention, we wanted to evaluate how often a fungal or mycobacterial culture produced actionable information in cases of suspected PJI. Methods/Case Report Data reports were retrieved from both the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and the Laboratory Information System (LIS) from May 2022 to May 2023. As sources submitted by the provider often do not specify that the joint is prosthetic, data from LIS was evaluated to identify microbiology culture test sets ordered on joint sources, while data from EHR was examined to isolate patients with implanted joints. Using Microsoft Excel, data from both systems was compared in order to match microbiology culture test sets to the known implanted joints. LIS data from implanted joint sources was assessed to record negative (no growth) and positive (growth) cultures, and to register all organisms isolated. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Of 794 order sets for cultures collected from prosthetic joint sources, 430 included requests for fungal culture and 79 included requests for mycobacterial culture. Of these 79 requests for mycobacterial culture, 0 organisms were isolated (0%). Of these 430 requests for fungal culture, 7 grew yeast (1.6%) and 7 out of 7 (100%) of these yeasts were also isolated on general (aerobic bacterial) culture. No molds were isolated. Conclusion Discontinuing the routine practice of ordering fungal and mycobacterial culture for prosthetic joint sources would have no negative impact on patient care but would reduce unnecessary work in the microbiology laboratory and potentially avoid additional costs to the patient. Education to the orthopedic provider group as well as best practice alerts in the EHR will be pursued, based on the findings from this study, in order to reduce unnecessary culture orders.

Which treatment in acetabular fractures of the elderly: Osteosynthesis, osteosynthesis-THA or orthopedic treatment? 2-years retrospective outcomes of a therapeutic algorithm

IntroductionAcetabular fractures account for 7% of osteoporotic fractures, with an epidemiological peak between 75 and 80 years of age. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of treatment of these fractures in a population aged over 65. HypothesisSurgical treatment would lead to better survival and functional outcomes in the management of acetabular fractures in subjects aged over 65. Material and methodsPatients over 65 years of age treated for acetabular fracture between January 2017 and May 2020 were included in this retrospective single-center study and divided into three treatment groups: osteosynthesis, osteosynthesis-THA (Osteosynthesis-THA) and orthopedic treatment. The choice of treatment was made according to an algorithm that considered the patient's co-morbidities, autonomy and bone lesions. The primary endpoint was patient survival at 12 and 24 months' follow-up. Results94 patients (mean age 78.5 +/-8.4 years) were included: 29 patients treated with orthopedic therapy, 46 patients with osteosynthesis and 19 patients with osteosynthesis-THA. Mean follow-up was 32.7+/-14.9 months.Mortality rates were higher in the orthopedic and osteosynthesis-THA groups (20.7% and 21.1% respectively). Patients in the orthopedic and osteosynthesis-THA groups showed excess mortality, with hazard ratios (HR) of 3.4 ([1.02; 11.3], p < 0.05) and 3.3 ([0.9; 12.3], p = 0.08) respectively, compared with those treated with osteosynthesis.Mean PMA at 2 years, mean Harris score at 2 years and Parker score were significantly higher in the operated groups.The rate of conversion to THA (THA) was higher in the orthopedic treatment group (27.6%). The complication rate was 24% (11/46) for the osteosynthesis group, 42% (8/19) for the osteosynthesis-THA group. DiscussionApplying our decision algorithm, orthopedic treatment is inferior to surgical treatment in terms of survival and functional results, with a higher re-intervention rate for THA than treatment with osteosynthesis. This study confirms the place of osteosynthesis, with higher functional scores, lower complication and revision rates, and a positive effect on mortality. Level of evidenceIV; Retrospective cohort study

Characterization of spatiotemporal and kinetic gait variables in dogs with hindlimb ataxia and bilateral hindlimb lameness

BackgroundDiscriminating the underlying cause of gait abnormalities can be challenging in a clinical setting, especially in the presence of bilateral disease. Pressure-sensitive walkways (PSWs) have been utilized to characterize the gait of dogs with various neurologic or orthopaedic conditions. The potential use of the PSW includes the discrimination of conditions that can be similar in clinical presentation, such as bilateral hindlimb lameness and hindlimb ataxia. The primary aim of this study was to describe the spatial, temporal, and kinetic gait parameters of dogs with hindlimb ataxia or bilateral hindlimb lameness and compare them to those of normal dogs. Forty-six dogs were prospectively recruited. The normal group included 20 dogs with normal neurologic and orthopaedic exams. The orthopaedic group included 15 dogs with bilateral hindlimb orthopaedic diseases with weight-bearing hindlimb lameness and normal neurologic exams. The neurologic group included 11 dogs with ambulatory paraparesis and normal orthopaedic exams. Each dog was walked across the PSW, and at least 3 valid trials were collected. The stride time, stance time, swing time, stride length, gait velocity, peak vertical force (PVF), vertical impulse (VI), and limb symmetry were recorded. The mean values of all parameters from the valid trials were calculated and used for data analysis. The outcomes were compared among all groups.ResultsCompared with the normal group, the orthopaedic group had a significantly greater percent body weight distribution (%BWD) and vertical impulse distribution (VID) in the forelimbs. When comparing the spatiotemporal parameters, the neurologic group showed an increase in forelimb stance time compared to that of the normal group. Compared with that in the normal group, the stride velocity in the forelimbs in the orthopaedic group was greater. There were no significant differences in the kinetic parameters between the neurologic group and the normal group, nor in stride time or stride length among the groups.ConclusionThe gait parameters obtained by PSW demonstrated that the orthopaedic and neurologic groups may have different compensatory mechanisms for their gait deficiencies. These parameters can potentially be used to construct a predictive model to evaluate PSW as a diagnostic tool in future studies.

Use of Muscle Relaxants After Surgery in Traditional Medicare Part D Enrollees.

Surgeons have come under increased scrutiny for postoperative pain management, particularly for opioid prescribing. To decrease opioid use but still provide pain control, nonopioid medications such as muscle relaxants are being used, which can be harmful in older adults. However, the prevalence of muscle relaxant prescribing, trends in use over time, and risk of prolonged use are unknown. Using a 20% representative Medicare sample, we conducted a retrospective analysis of muscle relaxant prescribing to patients ≥ 65 years of age. We merged patient data from Medicare Carrier, MedPAR, and Outpatient Files with Medicare Part D for the years 2013-2018. A total of 14 surgical procedures were included to represent a wide range of anatomic regions and specialties. The study cohort included 543,929 patients. Of the cohort, 8111 (1.5%) received a new muscle relaxant prescription at discharge. Spine procedures accounted for 12% of all procedures but 56% of postoperative prescribing. Overall, the rate of prescribing increased over the time period (1.4-2.0%, p < 0.001), with increases in prescribing primarily in the spine (7-9.6%, p < 0.0001) and orthopedic procedure groups (0.9-1.4%, p < 0.0001). Of patients discharged with a new muscle relaxant prescription, 10.7% had prolonged use. The use of muscle relaxants in the postoperative period for older adults is low, but increasing over time, especially in ortho and spine procedures. While pain control after surgery is crucial, surgeons should carefully consider the risks of muscle relaxant use, especially for older adults who are at higher risk for medication-related problems.

Comparing clinical outcomes of patients with severe lower limb trauma undergoing orthoplastic and orthopedic surgeries: A long-term study protocol

This long-term study protocol aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with severe lower limb trauma undergoing orthoplastic and orthopedic surgeries, focusing on their physical and psychological status. Patients with lower limb injuries and open fractures have been recruited since October 2019 and will be followed up until October 2024. The patients will be divided into two groups: (1) Orthoplastic group, where single-stage debridement, fixation, and soft tissue repair will be performed, and (2) Orthopedic group, where soft tissue repair will be done in a delayed-stage. The follow-up period will be one year, during which clinical data, limb function recovery, psychological scores, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will be evaluated to assess postoperative recovery and clinical outcomes. Additional clinical data, such as socio-demographic information, baseline features, Enneking score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, two-point discrimination score, and blood test parameters will also be collected. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) will be used to evaluate HRQOL, while the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) will assess the severity of self-reported post-traumatic stress disorder. The results of this study will provide valuable insights into prognostically relevant targets and contribute to improving the management and outcomes of patients with lower limb injuries and open fractures, who often face challenges related to limb disability and potential amputation postoperatively, significantly impacting their psychological and physical well-being.

Mortality after major lower extremity amputation and association with index level: a cohort study based on 11,205 first-time amputations from nationwide Danish databases.

Mortality after major lower extremity amputations is high and may depend on amputation level. We aimed to examine the mortality risk in the first year after major lower extremity amputation divided into transtibial and transfemoral amputations. This observational cohort study used data from the Danish Nationwide Health registers. 11,205 first-time major lower extremity amputations were included from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021, comprising 3,921 transtibial amputations and 7,284 transfemoral amputations. The 30-day mortality after transtibial amputation was overall 11%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10-12 (440/3,921) during the study period, but declined from 10%, CI 7-13 (37/381) in 2010 to 7%, CI 4-11 (15/220) in 2021. The 1-year mortality was 29% overall, CI 28-30 (1,140 /3,921), with a decline from 31%, CI 21-36 (117/381) to 20%, CI 15-26 (45/220) during the study period. For initial transfemoral amputation, the 30-day mortality was overall 23%, CI 22-23 (1,673/7,284) and declined from 27%, CI 23-31 (138/509) to 22%, CI 19-25 (148/683) during the study period. The 1-year mortality was 48% overall, CI 46-49 (3,466/7,284) and declined from 55%, CI 50-59 (279/509) to 46%, CI 42-50 (315/638). The mortality after major lower extremity amputation declined in the 12-year study period; however, the 1-year mortality remained high after both transtibial and transfemoral amputations (20% and 46% in 2021). Hence, major lower extremity amputation patients constitute one of the most fragile orthopedic patient groups, emphasizing an increased need for attention in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative setting.

An Effective Program to Reduce Malpractice Claims and Payments in a Large Orthopaedic Practice.

High reliability in health care requires a balance between intentionally designed systems and individual professional accountability. One element of accountability includes a process for addressing clinicians whose practices are associated with a disproportionate share of patient complaints. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Patient Advocacy Reporting System (PARS), a tiered intervention model to reduce patient complaints about clinicians. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving a southeastern U.S. orthopaedic group practice. The study assessed the implementation of the PARS program and subsequent malpractice claims from 2004 to 2020. The implementation of PARS was associated with an 83% reduction in malpractice claims cost per high-risk clinician after intervention (p = 0.05; Wilcoxon rank sum test). The overall practice group experienced an 87% reduction in mean annual claims cost per clinician (p = 0.007; segmented regression). The successful adoption required essential elements such as PARS champions, peer messengers, an Office of Patient Affairs, and a clear statement of practice values and professionalism expectations at the time of onboarding. The PARS program was successfully adopted within a surgical specialty group as a part of ongoing risk prevention and management efforts. The period following PARS was associated with a retrospectively measured reduction in malpractice claim costs. The PARS program can be effectively implemented in a large, single-specialty orthopaedic practice setting and, although not necessarily causal, was, in our case, associated with a period of reduced malpractice claim costs. We have learned in previous research that there are clear links between professionalism and patient outcomes (e.g., surgical complications), but agree that the focus here on medical malpractice is not directly clinical.

Orthopedic Treatment in the Era of COVID-19: Perspectives from a National Survey in Thailand

Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the management of patients with non-emergent orthopedic conditions, resulting in postponed surgical intervention(s) and changes in hospital services. Specific guidelines have been issued for emergency orthopedic cases; however, no definitive guidelines have been proposed for the management of elective or non-urgent conditions during the pandemic. As such, physicians have been obliged to make decisions based on their judgment. This study aimed to analyze data regarding changes in general orthopedic practices during the pandemic, especially those pertaining to surgery, clinical procedures, follow-up periods, referrals, and protective equipment. Methods: This study investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of non-urgent orthopedic conditions by outpatient orthopedists. A questionnaire was developed and shared with nationwide orthopedic social media groups and through e-mails. Results Of the 200 orthopedic surgeons invited to participate, 129 (64.5%) responded. Results revealed that 65.9% of the surgeons preferred conservative treatment to surgery among patients with the appropriate indications. Additionally, follow-up periods were extended in 69.0% of patients, and 70.5% were prescribed more medication. The N-95 mask and home delivery system for medications were the two most desirable protective equipment and innovations that surgeons needed (79.1% and 69.8% of respondents, respectively). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in general orthopedic practices in outpatient clinics, such as a preference for more conservative treatment than surgery, extension of appointment periods, prescription of medicine for a longer period, and use of drug delivery to patients’ homes.

Expert consensus on Prospective Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies for Osteoporotic Fractures.

Osteoporotic fractures are the most severe complications of osteoporosis, characterized by poor bone quality, difficult realignment and fixation, slow fracture healing, and a high risk of recurrence. Clinically managing these fractures is relatively challenging, and in the context of rapid aging, they pose significant social hazards. The rapid advancement of disciplines such as biophysics and biochemistry brings new opportunities for future medical diagnosis and treatment. However, there has been limited attention to precision diagnosis and treatment strategies for osteoporotic fractures both domestically and internationally. In response to this, the Chinese Medical Association Orthopaedic Branch Youth Osteoporosis Group, Chinese Geriatrics Society Geriatric Orthopaedics Committee, Chinese Medical Doctor Association Orthopaedic Physicians Branch Youth Committee Osteoporosis Group, and Shanghai Association of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Osteoporosis Professional Committee have collaborated to develop this consensus. It aims to elucidate emerging technologies that may play a pivotal role in both diagnosis and treatment, advocating for clinicians to embrace interdisciplinary approaches and incorporate these new technologies into their practice. Ultimately, the goal is to improve the prognosis and quality of life for elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures.

Beyond Words: Embracing Migration Percentage as the Universal Measurement for Hip Displacement in Children With Cerebral Palsy by Radiologists and Orthopedic Surgeons.

Migration percentage (MP) is the standard radiographic measurement to quantify hip displacement in cerebral palsy (CP) hip surveillance programs. We aim to evaluate the use of MP and other descriptors of hip displacement in radiographic impressions by radiologists and orthopedic surgeons before and after the introduction of hip surveillance guidelines at our institution. CP patients who underwent hip surveillance imaging at our institution in 2016 were retrospectively identified, and their radiographic impressions were collected between 2016 and 2019. Only patients with radiology and orthopedic impressions for the same image were included. The inclusion of MP was documented and compared between the two groups before and after the hip guidelines were implemented in 2018.We also examined the use of other qualitative descriptors for hip displacement within the impressions. Fisher's Exact test was used for statistical significance (p<0.05). Results: Two hundred and fifty-one radiographs were analyzed. One radiology (0.40%) and 33 orthopedic impressions (13.15%) incorporated MP (p<0.001). No statistical significance was found between the inclusion of MP before and after 2018 in the radiology group. In contrast, the orthopedic group showed a significant increase in MP inclusion following guideline implementation, rising from 12 to 21 incidences (p=0.013). Descriptors for hip displacement were more commonly utilized than MP for both orthopedic surgeons and radiologists. Conclusion: MP is underutilized in radiologic and orthopedic impressions in hip surveillance programs. Extensive education for both specialties regarding MP is crucial for the successful management of hip displacement in CP hip surveillance programs.

Effect of orthopedic insoles on spinal deformity and walking in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis summary.

To observe the effects of scoliosis-specific exercise therapy combined with braces and orthopedic insoles on improved spinal deformity and walking ability in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). From September 2019 to September 2020, 60 outpatient AIS patients were distributed into brace group (n = 30) at random and brace combined orthopedic insole group (n = 30). Both groups underwent brace dryness, and the observation group used scoliosis-specific exercise therapy combined with brace therapy, and on this basis, orthopedic insole intervention was added for 8 h per day for 2 months. At the same time, 20 adolescents of the same age with normal spinal development were recruited as a healthy group. GaitScan instruments were used to collect gait and plantar pressure measurements from study subjects. First, the gait and plantar pressure data of AIS patients and healthy groups were compared horizontally to ascertain the abnormal indicators, and then the spinal deformity and the above abnormal indicators were compared between the brace group and the brace combined orthopedic insole group. The plantar pressure center drift index (CPEI) in the AIS group was higher than that in the healthy group (F = 3.120, P < 0.05), and there were significant differences in the ratio of medial and lateral heel pressure (M/l) and total foot pressure (P < 0.05) between the AIS group and the healthy group, and no noticeable variations were found in the support phase period, walking speed, and proportion of each phase (P > 0.05). After treatment, the Cobb angle was significantly reduced in both the brace group and the brace combined with orthopedic insole group (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant changes in the pressure ratio of CPEI, M/l and bilateral full foot in the brace group (P > 0.05). The CPEI decreased in the brace combined with orthopedic insole group (P < 0.05), and the pressure ratio of M/l and bilateral full foot tended to 1 (P < 0.05), and was better than that in the brace group (P < 0.05). Patients with AIS may have local and worldwide asymmetric changes in plantar pressure distribution. The addition of orthopedic insoles has limited effect on improving scoliosis deformity in patients with AIS, but it can effectively improve the abnormal biomechanics of patients with AIS, so that the patient's force tends to be balanced.

Increasing rates of clinic no-shows during and following the COVID-19 pandemic at an academic orthopaedic multispecialty group

Background: Clinic no-shows are common throughout all medical specialties and can be used as a potential surrogate marker for access to care and have a significant impact on patients and providers. While anecdotally, orthopaedic surgeons have noticed unprecedented changes in the delivery of care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the effect on no-show rates has not been quantified. Methods: An analysis of the rates of outpatient clinic no-shows within a multispecialty, academic orthopaedic surgery practice was completed. Encounters were sub-classified into designated periods based on a “pre-COVID-19” period, a “COVID-19” period, and a “post-COVID-19” period. A univariate analysis was performed to comment on differences amongst insurance payer status. A multivariate regression was completed to assess which variables contributed to no-show rates among this orthopaedic practice. Results: The overall no-show rate over the course of the study was 8.5%. These rates differed significantly between insurance groups, with the lowest no-show rate among Workers’ Compensation/Liability Insurance (WC/LI; 6.4%) and the highest among uninsured patients (21.4%). Additionally, no-show rates differed significantly by COVID period (pre-COVID=7.3%, COVID=8.6%, P&lt;.0001). These rates further increased in the post-COVID period (9.6%, P&lt;.0001) In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, medical practice habits have altered out of necessity. Conclusions: Despite a relaxation of social distancing guidelines, no-show rates have continued to increase at our institution. Our results suggest a disproportionate effect on those of lower socioeconomic status. The specific needs of the patient population should be considered when implementing strategies to improve clinic attendance.

Feasibility of a Novel Fluoroscopic Trainer for the Orthopaedic Trainee

We sought to create a novel method of teaching orthopedic trainees to efficiently obtain intraoperative radiographs using nonfluoroscopic digital cameras. Specifically, teaching them to make minor, uniplanar, adjustments while limiting the number of fluoroscopy images obtained during placement of a guidewire "start-point," for intramedullary nailing. Prospective cohort study including medical students from 2 academic centers. Two nonfluoroscopic digital cameras simulating orthogonal fluoroscopic images were utilized. A sponge was used to simulate soft tissue resistance while navigating a guidewire to the desired starting point. Three cannulated parallel cylinders in a triangular configuration are used to simulate our "start point." Students completed 4 phases; trial and error, teaching, testing and retention. The protocol was completed at a single academic teaching hospital at the primary authors institution. We utilized medical students from 2 GME accredited medical schools to complete the protocol. Students were selected from orthopedic surgery interest groups at their respective institutions and participation was voluntary. Twenty-one medical students completed the protocol. The number of seconds to achieve each target along with the number of pictures to achieve each target were recorded and averaged. The paired t-test was used to compare the difference between phases. There is a statistically significant difference in the mean number of seconds to achieve each target between phase 1 (baseline) and phase 3 (testing) (p < 0.0001). This statistically significant difference was retained in phase 4 (retention) (p < 0.0001). We were able to demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in the number of images and time to obtain the correct "start point." This could theoretically decrease operative time and morbidity while teaching students in a low-stress training environment without exposure to radiation.

Does Academic Productivity Correlate With Industry Payments in Hand Surgery Fellowship Programs in the United States?

Hand surgeons and the industry share a common goal to improve the care of patients. However, industry support remains controversial, and the current relationship with fellowship programs remains unclear. This study explores the relationship between industry support and research productivity among hand surgeons in the academic setting. The Open Payments database, created by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a result of the Sunshine Act, was used to identify supplemental income paid to physicians of hand surgery fellowships in the United States. Both lifetime individual physician and aggregated fellowship Sunshine Act supplemental income (2015-2021) were collected for review. Supplemental income only reflects royalties, consulting fees, or food and does not include direct research funding. H-index was collected through the Scopus website as a proxy for academic productivity. Six hundred and thirty-four faculty physicians (90.8%) from 94 hand surgery fellowships (100%) were included in the study. The mean individual physician lifetime supplemental income was $67,272 (median$341,861),whereas the mean individual physician H-index was 12.5 (median 9.0). There was a significant and weak positive correlation between individual physician H-index and lifetime income (p<0.001). Similarly, there was a significant and moderately positive correlation between the combined fellowship H-index and total lifetime income (p<0.001). Research productivity of an orthopedic hand fellowship group and individual academic hand surgeon correlate with overall industry support from indirect research funding. Further work is required to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of industry support of academically productive hand surgeons at hand surgery fellowships.

Surgical Residents´ Results Seem to be Non-Inferior Comparing to More Experienced Surgeons in Femoral Neck Fracture Osteosynthesis

Purpose of the StudyFemoral neck fracture osteosynthesis is usually performed by using dynamic hip screw (DHS) or multiple parallel cannulated screws (MCS). In orthopedic surgery training, certain hip fractures are one of the most common operations performed by residents. It has been questioned, whether residents can provide as safe treatment and patient outcomes as those of more experienced surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical experience on risk of complications by comparing the surgical performance and clinical outcomes in femoral neck osteosyntheses between surgical residents and orthopaedic surgeons.MethodsAll patients with femoral neck fracture admitted to Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) Hyvinkää Hospital from 2011 to 2016 were collected as research material. 88 hip fractures (87 patients) treated with DHS or MCS osteosyntheses were included in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, based on the surgeon’s experience: an orthopedic surgeon group (n = 68) and a surgical resident group (n = 20). All data from complications, reoperations, and the duration of operations were collected.ResultsThere was no significant difference in characteristics of operated patients between orthopaedics and residents group. There was no significant difference in complications or re-operations between groups (p = 0.4, p = 0.2). Surgical residents had statistically longer surgical time (mean 76 min, 95% CI 62.92 min, mean 46 min, 95% Cl 42.51 min; p-value < 0.001). Still surgical time was not a risk factor for complication (p-value 0.5).ConclusionOur results show that surgical residents´ outcomes in femoral neck fracture osteosynthesis seem to be as favorable as those of orthopedic surgeons; the operations just last slightly longer.

Dedicated Early Morning Orthopaedic Trauma Operating Room Is Associated With Shorter Time to Surgery and Decreased Length of Hospital Stay for Children Undergoing Surgical Treatment of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the use of a dedicated early morning orthopaedic trauma operating room (OR) resulted in shorter wait times, decreased surgical times, decreased length of stay (LOS), and decreased complications in children treated with urgent surgical intervention for supracondylar humerus fractures. This retrospective comparative cohort study at a level I pediatric trauma center included patients younger than 12 years with supracondylar humerus fractures urgently treated with closed or open reduction and percutaneous pinning. Index surgical cases from April 28, 2013, to February 26, 2020, were included. Patients with prior humerus fracture, concomitant injuries, open fracture, pulseless supracondylar fracture, or missing data were excluded. Patients were analyzed based on the type of OR: dedicated early morning orthopaedic trauma OR or typical daytime orthopaedic OR. The primary outcome was time from presentation to surgery. Secondary outcomes included surgical time, complications, and LOS. A total of 401 patients with a mean age of 5 ± 2 (range: 1 to 11) years and a mean follow-up of 2.0 ± 2.1 (range: 0.5 to 25.0) months were included, of whom 137 patients (34%) underwent surgery in the early morning dedicated orthopaedic trauma OR. The dedicated early morning orthopaedic OR group had significantly less time from presentation to surgery (7.5 versus 9.4 hours; P = 0.0002) and shorter LOS (21.0 versus 24.0 hours; P = 0.004) compared with children treated in the typical daytime orthopaedic OR. Surgical time (31.1 versus 32.6 minutes; P = 0.40) and complication rates (5.8% versus 4.9%; P = 0.65) were similar between the groups. No revision surgery was required in either group. Surgical wait times were diminished with use of the dedicated early morning OR, as was LOS. Surgical times and complication rates were similar between groups. Institutions may consider adopting a dedicated early morning orthopaedic trauma OR to improve surgical wait times and decrease LOS. III.

Comparing prevalence and types of potentially inappropriate medications among patient groups in a post-acute and secondary care hospital

Reducing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is a challenge in post-acute care hospitals. Some PIMs may be associated with patient characteristics and it may be useful to focus on frequent PIMs. This study aimed to identify characteristic features of PIMs by grouping patients as in everyday clinical practice. A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for 541 patients aged 75 years or older in a Japanese post-acute and secondary care hospital. PIMs on admission were identified using the Screening Tool for Older Person’s Appropriate Prescriptions for Japanese. The patients were divided into four groups based on their primary disease and reason for hospitalization: post-acute orthopedics, post-acute neurological disorders, post-acute others, and subacute. Approximately 60.8% of the patients were taking PIMs, with no significant difference among the four patient groups in terms of prevalence of PIMs (p = 0.08). However, characteristic features of PIM types were observed in each patient group. Hypnotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were common in the post-acute orthopedics group, multiple antithrombotic agents in the post-acute neurological disorders group, diuretics in the post-acute others group, and hypnotics and diuretics in the subacute group. Grouping patients in clinical practice revealed characteristic features of PIM types in each group.

Evaluating the Use of PROMs in Paediatric Orthopaedic Registries.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide structured information on the patient's health experience and facilitate shared clinical decision-making. Registries that collect PROMs generate essential information about the clinical course and efficacy of interventions. Whilst PROMs are increasingly being used in adult orthopaedic registries, their use in paediatric orthopaedic registries is not well known. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the frequency and scope of registries that collect PROMs in paediatric orthopaedic patient groups. In July 2023, six databases were systematically searched to identify studies that collected PROMs using a registry amongst patients aged under 18 years with orthopaedic diagnoses. Of 3190 identified articles, 128 unique registries were identified. Three were exclusively paediatric, 27 were majority paediatric, and the remainder included a minority of paediatric patients. One hundred and twenty-eight registries collected 72 different PROMs, and 58% of these PROMs were not validated for a paediatric population. The largest group of orthopaedic registries collected PROMs on knee ligament injuries (21%). There are few reported dedicated orthopaedic registries collecting PROMs in paediatric populations. The majority of PROMs collected amongst paediatric populations by orthopaedic registries are not validated for patients under the age of 18 years. The use of non-validated PROMs by registries greatly impedes their utility and impact. Dedicated orthopaedic registries collecting paediatric-validated PROMs are needed to increase health knowledge, improve decision-making between patients and healthcare providers, and optimise orthopaedic management.

Efficacy of Flap-based Posterior Trunk Reconstruction after Vertebrectomy and Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Adjuvant radiation therapy following vertebrectomy is a major risk factor for local wound complications such as dehiscence, infection, and skin necrosis. In selected cases, well-vascularized coverage and modification of tension forces on the wound might reduce the risk of postoperative complications and reoperations. We aimed to demonstrate a reduction in general and specific complications in patients undergoing vertebral resection and flap coverage compared with vertebral resection alone. We retrospectively analyzed and collected data from patients diagnosed with a tumor involving the spine and requiring a total or partial posterior vertebrectomy between January 2012 and October 2022, referred to a single tertiary-level orthopedic and trauma center. We included only patients in whom primary closure of the wound was possible but judged to be under excessive tension. A total of 145 patients underwent partial or total vertebrectomy for oncological reasons at our tertiary-level trauma hospital. Among these, 73 patients were eventually included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria: 53 in the orthopedic group and 20 in the orthoplastic group. Considering only patients undergoing radiation therapy, the orthoplastic group showed significantly lower rates of overall complications (33% versus 69%) than the orthopedic group. Primary flap coverage, especially in patients receiving RT, reduces the risk of postoperative complications and avoids a second reconstructive operation, consequently reducing patient discomfort, length of hospital stay, and healthcare costs.

“Sawbones”: A pilot study assessing simulation-based orthopedic training for medical students

IntroSimulation-based training has become a valuable new tool in medical education across the country. The Orthopedic Surgery Interest Group (OSIG) at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine organized a benchtop training workshop known as “Sawbones” to give medical students essential exposure to basic techniques and instruments commonly used in orthopedic surgery. This pilot study seeks to investigate the participating students’ perceptions of this workshop as part of a potential longitudinal intervention. MethodsA total of 30 medical students (MS1-MS4) with a documented interest in orthopedic surgery were randomly selected via email invitation to participate in this workshop. Students first had a lecture-based training session with faculty on an overview of screw fixation. Participants then formed groups that were headed by an orthopedic resident or attending and took turns fixing fractures on model bones made of synthetic material. Following the session, students were sent an anonymous Qualtrics survey to assess their satisfaction with the workshop. ResultsA total of 22 students (73%), responded to the survey. On a ten-point scale, the average reported interest in orthopedics was 9.2 (SD 0.4). All students (n = 22, 100%) reported that they would like more hands-on orthopedic experiences as a component of their medical education. Nineteen students (86.4%) reported that this training increased their interest in pursuing a career in orthopedic surgery and twenty-one (95.5%) further stated that they would recommend this training to other students. DiscussionBased on the results of this pilot study, Sawbones was promising at engaging students in orthopedics, providing a team environment, and introducing students to orthopedic skills and instrumentation. Providing these sessions in a longitudinal manner could provide opportunities for mentorship and better prepare students for a residency in orthopedics. We recommend a program like Sawbones to better address the lack of Orthopedic exposure in medical school.