Orthopaedic Residency Training Research Articles

Sex Diversity in the Emerging United States Arthroplasty Workforce is Limited

Sex diversity remains limited in the United States (US) arthroplasty workforce. This study evaluates fellowship program characteristics associated with increased sex diversity in US-based fellowship programs and the pipeline of female trainees prior to arthroplasty fellowship. Demographic data from 233,981 allopathic medical school graduates, 11,364 orthopaedic surgery residents, and 1,501 arthroplasty fellows were analyzed. Female trainee representation was calculated among allopathic medical students, orthopaedic surgery residents, and arthroplasty fellows (2012 to 2022). Fellowship program characteristics associated with increased sex diversity among arthroplasty fellows were evaluated with Chi-square tests. Female representation in arthroplasty fellowship training (5.9%) was less than that in orthopaedic surgery residency (15.1%) and allopathic medical school (47.6%) training (P < 0.001). Sex diversity in arthroplasty fellowship training increased over the study period (2.4 to 9.9%, P < 0.001). The presence of female faculty, geographic region, accreditation status, annual number of fellows, and total number of faculty were not associated with increased sex diversity of arthroplasty fellows (P > 0.05). Sex diversity in arthroplasty fellowship training has improved over the past decade. Yet, female trainees remain under-represented relative to the trainee pipeline. Increased efforts to recruit female medical students and orthopaedic residents may help promote workforce diversity in arthroplasty.

3D-printed model is a useful addition in orthopedic resident education for the understanding of tibial plateau fractures

This study aimed to explore the role of the three-dimension (3D) printed models in orthopedic resident training of tibial plateau fractures. A total of 41 residents from our institution were divided into two groups. The intervention group, consisting of 20 residents, had access to 3D-printed models illustrating thirteen tibial plateau fractures. In contrast, the control group, comprising 21 residents, received digital images of thirteen identical tibial plateau fractures. Evaluation of learning outcomes included the accurate identification of tibial plateau fracture patterns, deduction of traumatic mechanisms, preoperative plan, assessment time, and subjective questionnaire responses. The participants with 3D printed models scored significantly higher in both the Schatzker classification and Luo three-column classification compared to those without 3D printed models. Residents in the intervention group performed better in accuracy in deducing traumatic mechanisms compared to the control group. In addition, the sum score of preoperative plan in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group. Specifically, participants with 3D printed models scored higher in surgical approach choice and implants placement than these in the control group. Residents exposed to 3D printed models also spent less time to complete the assessment than those with access only to digital imaging. Subjective assessments indicated that 3D-printed models boosted confidence in fracture identification, improved preoperative plan for fracture management and enhanced the understanding in injury mechanism of tibial plateau fractures. Furthermore, residents agreed that the use of 3D-printed models heightened their interest in learning tibial plateau fractures. Therefore, the addition of 3D printed models significantly contributed to a comprehensive understanding of tibial plateau fractures, the improvement in fracture identification, inferring injury mechanisms and preoperative plan.

Professional Behavior Assessment During Residency Training: Can We Identify Outliers?

The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Knowledge, Skills, and Behavior (KSB) project sets up a framework for competency-based medical education for orthopaedic surgery residency training. The Behavior aspect of KSB includes use of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Behavior Tool (ABOSBT) to assess 5 domains of professional behavior. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of 2 years of ABOSBT assessments and to characterize the low score ratings. All ABOSBT assessments from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, were reviewed totaling 51,678 completed assessments with 48,648 (94%) assessments from a 360° process and 3,030 (6%) as end-of-rotation assessments. Distribution of 51,678 ABOSBT assessments with 258,390 scores demonstrated low scores (disagree or strongly disagree) in 0.9% of assessments. All 5 domains identified low scores in a small percentage at all years-in-training with the greatest number in second- and third-year residents. Comparison of scores from 360° vs. end-of-rotation requests demonstrated a higher percentage of low scores given during the 360° process (p < 0.0001). Three thousand seven hundred seven unique evaluators completed ABOSBT assessments, with attending physicians as the most frequent evaluator type (44%); inpatient nurses assessed residents with low ABOSBT scores more frequently (4.5%) than any other evaluator type. Residents with 2 or more low scores by 2 or more different evaluators were analyzed for each of the 5 domains; low scores were most frequently observed in the reliability domain. The ABOSBT was originally validated 5 years ago in 18 programs with 9,892 assessments; this article updates results using the ABOSBT across 95 programs assessing 2,397 residents with 3,707 evaluators. The ABOSBT demonstrates that most residents demonstrate professional behavior across 5 domains of assessment; the ABOSBT identifies residents with low scores. A strength of KSB is the ability to identify professionalism deficiencies while residents are in training and can focus on individualized educational improvement. Tracking residents with low scores on the ABOSBT assessment over time will help determine its effectiveness in identifying unprofessional behavior.

A Survey of Post-Graduate Satisfaction With Orthopaedic Residency Training at a Single Institution.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has called for self-study within residency programs. Post-graduate surveys allow the graduate to reflect upon their residency experience after years of autonomous practice. Despite their potential utility, a standardized assessment of residency training from the perspective of orthopaedic alumni does not exist. In this study, we aimed to create, analyze, and share with our alumni a post-graduate survey based on ACGME core competencies. The survey was developed by full-time orthopaedic faculty and reviewed by a survey methodologist to ensure clarity and an ideal survey format. In May 2020, the survey was emailed to all 90 graduates from 2000 to 2019. Respondents were polled on current clinical practice and satisfaction with program-specific initiatives, residency requirements, and learning environment issues based on a 7-point Likert scale. Respondents were also given the opportunity to provide open-ended responses. Data were collected within the survey platform and subdivided into 3 cohorts based on years since graduation. The response rate was 71% (64/90). The likelihood of fellowship training increased with recency since graduation. Most respondents are in either private or health-system-owned practice but 23% work in an academic center.The oldest cohort had greater variability in clinical practice. Most program-specific initiatives received high satisfaction scores, but graduates within the past 5 years had the lowest satisfaction scores. Instruction of skills included in ACGME competencies received generally favorable reviews, but professional development skills, such as starting a practice and evaluating job opportunities, received low marks.The overall satisfaction with the program was high (86%) but was lowest among most recent graduates. The post-graduate survey demonstrates areas of strength and weakness and highlights dissatisfaction among recent graduates. The data will drive specific curricular changes within our program. The survey will be shared to promote self-study within other programs.

Accessibility and Characterization of Parental Leave Policies for Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Training in the United States.

This study assesses the accessibility and nature of parental leave policies during orthopaedic surgery residency training after implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (GME) mandate for 6 weeks of paid parental leave effective July of 2022. An audit of orthopaedic surgery residency and affiliated GME websites was conducted to assess the accessibility of parental leave policies during the 2023-2024 academic year. Details on length of leave and nature of renumeration during the leave were recorded. Bivariate analyses were conducted to determine residency program characteristics associated with the accessibility of a parental leave policy. Results were compared with a previous analysis during the 2017-2018 academic year. A total of 200 residency programs were evaluated, and 152 had parental leave policies (76.0%). Compared with 2017 to 2018, a similar percentage of parental leave policies were accessible on residency program websites (3.0% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.777) but fewer were accessible on GME websites (55.5% vs. 80.7%, P < 0.001). More contemporary policies were obtained from program coordinators (18.5% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.003), and more were not available (24.0% vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001). Most policies offered renumeration (86.7%) and leave for 6 weeks in length (75.0%). A higher prevalence of parental leave policy accessibility was found among orthopaedic residency programs with university affiliation (P < 0.001), more faculty members (P = 0.008) and residents (P = 0.017), a higher percentage of female faculty (P = 0.008), affiliation with a top 50 ranked National Institutes of Health-funded orthopaedic surgery department, and accreditation achieved before 2017 to 2018 (P = 0.004). Most orthopaedic surgery residency programs do not have accessible parental leave policies on their websites. The new Accreditation Council for GME mandate will require orthopaedic residency programs to provide residents with 6 weeks of paid parental leave during residency training. Accessible policies may be useful to applicants interested in child rearing during orthopaedic residency training.

Metaverse, virtual reality and augmented reality in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

PurposeThis systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on the role of the metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.MethodsA systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive review of the applications of the metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality in in-vivo intraoperative navigation, in the training of orthopedic residents, and in the latest innovations proposed in ex-vivo studies was conducted.ResultsA total of 22 articles were included in the review. Data on navigated shoulder arthroplasty was extracted from 14 articles: seven hundred ninety-three patients treated with intraoperative navigated rTSA or aTSA were included. Also, three randomized control trials (RCTs) reported outcomes on a total of fifty-three orthopedics surgical residents and doctors receiving VR-based training for rTSA, which were also included in the review. Three studies reporting the latest VR and AR-based rTSA applications and two proof of concept studies were also included in the review.ConclusionsThe metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality present immense potential for the future of orthopedic surgery. As these technologies advance, it is crucial to conduct additional research, foster development, and seamlessly integrate them into surgical education to fully harness their capabilities and transform the field. This evolution promises enhanced accuracy, expanded training opportunities, and improved surgical planning capabilities.

Pregnancy and infertility in orthopedics: A review of the current state.

Orthopedic surgery continues to have one of the lowest rates of female trainees among all medical specialties in the United States. Barriers to pursuing a surgical residency include the challenges of family planning and work-life balance during training. A systematic literature search of articles published between June 2012 and December 2022 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed in January 2023 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis). Studies were included if they evaluated pregnancy and peripartum experience and/or outcomes amongst orthopedic surgeons or trainees. Eighteen studies were included. Up to 67.3% of female orthopedic surgeons and trainees and 38.7% of their male counterparts delayed childbearing during residency. The most reported reasons for this delay included career choice as an orthopedic surgeon, residency training, and reputational concerns among faculty or co-residents. Infertility ranged from 17.0% to 30.4% in female orthopedic surgeons and up to 31.2% suffered obstetric complications. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) resulted in 12.4%-56.3% of successful pregnancies. Maternity and paternity leaves ranged from 1 to 11weeks for trainees with more negative attitudes associated with maternal leave. Female orthopedic trainees and attending delay childbearing, experience higher rates of obstetric complications, and more stigma associated with pregnancy compared to their male colleagues. Program and institutional policies regarding maternity and paternity leave are variable across programs, and therefore, attention should be directed toward standardizing policies.

A Curricular Model for Simulation Within Orthopaedic Residency Training.

American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery/American Council on GraduateMedical Education Residency Review Committee training requirements have necessitated the need for the adoption of simulation education into existing programmatic requirements. Current guidelines focus only on interns at a potentially significant cost to programs; both in total dollar amount and time. The authors aim to provide a model that can maximize utility for all resident levels, manage cost by maximizing the use of cadaveric material, and allow integration of varied industry support. The Oregon Health & Science University Orthopaedic education program has developed a high-fidelity training curriculum that (1) is applicable to both junior and senior residents (2) has minimized the cost per resident with the reuse of cadaveric specimens and (3) has nurtured partnerships with industry stakeholders to reduce bias in training by collaborating with most major industry representatives. The simulation curriculum outlined in this manuscript may serve as a reference for other programs and institutions to develop their own residency educational curriculum models.

WHAT HAPPENED TO ORTHOPAEDIC RESIDENCY AND RESEARCH DURING THE PANDEMIC?

In March 2020, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The pandemic imposed drastic changes in our social and professional routine. Professionally at all levels our hospital tasks were changed and prioritized. Surgeons and residents were deployed on rotations to fields other than their expertise in orthopaedics. Health-care education received major changes in these challenging times, and students did face difficulties in receiving education, as well as training due to limited clinical and surgical exposure.In response to the WHO regulations, most of the teaching centres and hospitals worldwide have adopted the web-based teaching and learning model to continue the education and training of orthopaedic residents. These results brought significant changes to the training experience in orthopaedic surgery in combination with the fact that clinical duty hours and case volume were substantially reduced.In what concerns orthopaedic journal publications, the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a decline in the annual publication rate for the first time in over 20 years. Although not uniform, the reduction was most likely due to multifactorial causes.Regarding the appraisal at the end of training, at the Orthopaedic European Board Examination we were able to verify that the outcome at the written part 1 exam was good, equivalent to the outcome prior to the pandemic. However the oral viva was much worse, probably due to the fact that residents skipped much of the clinical and surgical teaching and exposure during 2020 and 2021. At the end of training, theoretical/factual knowledge was good but poor from the clinical practical experience.

Use of Social Media in Orthopaedic Surgery Training and Practice: A Systematic Review.

Social media use has grown across healthcare delivery and practice, with dramatic changes occurring in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review to determine the current landscape of social media use by (1) orthopaedic surgery residencies/fellowship training programs and (2) individual orthopaedic surgeons and the change in use over time. We searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase) from their inception to April 2022 for all studies that analyzed the use of social media in orthopaedic surgery. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality, and extracted data. Methodology was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twenty-eight studies were included, of which 11 analyzed social media use by orthopaedic surgery residency and fellowship training programs and 17 examined its use by individual orthopaedic surgeons. Among residency and fellowship programs, Instagram was identified as the most common platform used, with 42% to 88% of programs reporting program-specific Instagram accounts, followed by Twitter/X (20%-52%) and Facebook (10%-38%). Social media was most commonly used by programs for recruitment and information dissemination to prospective residency applicants (82% and 73% of included studies, respectively). After the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a 620% and 177% increase in the number of training programs with Instagram and Twitter/X accounts, respectively. Individual use of social media ranged from 1.7% to 76% (Twitter/X), 10% to 73% (Facebook), 0% to 61% (Instagram), 22% to 61% (LinkedIn), and 6.5% to 56% (YouTube). Instagram, Twitter/X, and Facebook are the premier platforms that patients, residency applicants, and institutions frequent. With the continued growth of social media use anticipated, it will be critical for institutions and individuals to create and abide by guidelines outlining respectful and professional integration of social media into practice. Level IV.

Can an Orthopedic Hip Fracture Simulator Advance Orthopedic Residents’ Hip Fracture Fixation Skills to an Expert Level?

This study was undertaken to evaluate hip fracture simulator training and orthopedic resident skill attainment. We hypothesized that after 6 training sessions, improvement in post-training scores in junior residents would exceed that of senior residents and that senior residents would attain expert level proficiency sooner. Thirty orthopedic residents from a single institution completed 6 training sessions. Sessions included a pretest, 9 training modules, and post-test. An expert score was obtained from the average scores of 8 trauma fellows and attending orthopedic traumatologists. The primary outcome measure was overall score. A single academic institution. Orthopedic residents (postgraduate years [PGYs] 1-5). Twenty-six residents completed the study. The mean overall post-training score was 87% of the expert level. Factors associated with post-training score changes were additional training sessions (4.2% improvement [p < 0.01]), time between training sessions (0.3% decrease [p = 0.05]) and PGY5 class (12.1% improvement [p = 0.03]). Fifty-four percent of residents attained the expert overall score. Expert score attainment was not associated with an additional year of training or case log volume. Post-training scores plateaued for the PGY1s and showed linear improvement for the PGY5s. Differences in trends between training levels suggest this simulator is a useful adjunct to a 5-year orthopedic residency training program.

An application and exploration of entrustable professional activities in Chinese orthopaedic postgraduate residents training: a pilot study

BackgroundThrough the standardization of residency training in certain Chinese medical education institutions, it was discovered that the current evaluation system falls short in accurately assessing residents’ professional skills in clinical practice. Therefore, we developed the list of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) in orthopaedic residency training to explore a new evaluation system.MethodsThe process of constructing EPAs includes seven steps. 40 orthopaedic residents were randomly assigned to two groups (20 in each). The experimental group used the EPAs evaluation system while the control group employed the traditional Mini Clinical Exercise (Mini-CEX) system. Post-residency, theoretical and practical tests were conducted to measure training effectiveness. Additionally, a survey gauged teaching satisfaction, knowledge mastery, and course engagement in both groups.ResultsThe control group scored an average of 76.05 ± 10.58, while the experimental group achieved 83.30 ± 8.69 (p &amp;lt; 0.05) on the combined theoretical and practical test. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning teaching satisfaction, knowledge mastery, and course engagement.ConclusionThe application of EPAs in orthopaedic residency training yielded higher theoretical and practical test scores compared to the traditional formative evaluation system. It also enhanced teaching satisfaction, knowledge mastery, and course engagement. The EPAs present a potential model for national orthopaedic residency training.

Orthopedic oncology residency education, how broad and how deep?

Orthopedic residency training has long been an area of active research and discussion, and as the knowledge and concepts in subspecialties evolve, it is crucial to investigate the implications of these advancements in the musculoskeletal oncology field. It is important to note that the acquisition of surgical skills and scientific knowledge from orthopedic texts alone is not sufficient in this area. Orthopedic residents must also acquire multidisciplinary communication and leadership skills, as well as the mental capacity to make sound clinical decisions. Therefore, this commentary highlights the importance of assessing whether the current curriculum provides adequate preparation for residents' future careers, despite the fact that the expansion of subspecialties in orthopedic education has undoubtedly enhanced the depth of knowledge and concepts in the field. In addition, orthopedic residents must adopt an open-minded and scientific approach toward orthopedic oncology, which has unique principles. Moreover, it is crucial that general orthopedic surgeons have the necessary skills to manage patients and know when to refer them. By exploring these issues, we hope to continually contribute to ongoing discussions about how to improve orthopedic residency education.

Resident involvement in hand and upper extremity surgery: An analysis of 30-day complications

BackgroundRotations in hand and upper extremity surgery are a core component of the Orthopaedic and Plastic Surgery resident training curriculums. This study compares short-term outcomes in hand and upper extremity procedures with and without resident involvement. MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from years 2005–2012 for all procedures distal to the shoulder. Patients were stratified based on whether a resident scrubbed for the procedure. Outcome measures were 30-day mortality, reoperation rate, minor complications, major complications, and length of stay (LOS). Chi-squared tests were used to determine significant variables. Significant variables were included in a binomial multivariate logistic regression model. ResultsA total of 7697 patients were included in the study. Of those, 4509 (59 %) had no resident, and 3188 (41 %) had a resident. Patients with resident involvement were less likely to be Caucasian, ASA classification 3 or higher, and outpatient. Cohorts were similar with respect to age, sex, and emergent status. Operative time was 15 min longer in resident cases. Work relative value units were higher in resident cases. In the multivariate logistic regression model, resident involvement had no statistically significant impact on LOS, mortality, reoperation rate, minor complications, or major complications. Subgroup analysis showed increased odds of superficial surgical site infections in resident cases, although this was statistically insignificant (OR 1.35, p = 0.24). ConclusionsHand and upper extremity procedures with resident involvement do not have any increase in overall adverse short-term outcomes. In appropriately selected cases, residents can participate without compromising patient safety.

Comparison of the Incidence of Orthopedic Trauma Cases Managed in A Tertiary Hospital in Western Visayas During The Pre Covid and Covid Period and Its Effect on The Different Orthopedic Residency Training Program In The Region: A comparative study

Comparison of the Incidence of Orthopedic Trauma Cases Managed in A Tertiary Hospital in Western Visayas During The Pre Covid and Covid Period and Its Effect on The Different Orthopedic Residency Training Program In The Region: A comparative study

Tourniquet Practice Among Orthopaedic Surgeons in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of tourniquet use among orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia and assess the practical aspects of their use of tourniquets and the complications they have experienced in their practices. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to February 2023. An online questionnaire was distributed among orthopedic surgeons and trainees in Saudi Arabia, and the surgeons' knowledge of tourniquet use was assessed using 17 questions. To investigate tourniquet usage, the participants were divided into three groups: orthopedic residents, specialists, and consultants. An upper limb cuff pressure (CP) of 200 mmHg and a lower limb CP of 250 mmHg were chosen as the cut-off values, and the doctors' choices were compared against literature recommendations using these measures. Result A total of 205 participants filled out the questionnaires; 130 residents, 15 consultants, and 60 specialists, with more males (175/205) than females responding. One hundred and twenty-one surgeons placed the cuff on patients by themselves, while 50 (24.3%) surgeons asked nurses for aid; 135 (65.6%) of them work in teaching hospitals, while 50 (24.3%) work in community hospitals. The incidence of post-tourniquet syndrome was unrelated to expertise (p=0.12). Conclusion When applied properly, tourniquets prevent excessive bleeding and keep the operative field clean during limb surgeries. This study aims to inspire the orthopedic community to reconsider long-held practices, especially regarding tourniquet pressure. The addition of ligature safety education to orthopedics training and outlining the settings and procedures for applying pressure should also be considered. The orthopedic community should set CP and process criteria to avoid complications. This study showed the importance of modifying the training of orthopedic residents to raise awareness and prevent unpleasant events from occurring.

Arthroscopic Training: Historical Insights and Future Directions.

Arthroscopy is an orthopaedic technique that provides surgical solutions in a minimally invasive fashion. Since its introduction, arthroscopy has become a preferred surgical approach for treating various orthopaedic pathologies, such as meniscal tears, anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, rotator cuff tears, and wrist, elbow, ankle, and hip conditions. Despite its ubiquity, surgical training in arthroscopy poses several challenges for educators and trainees. Arthroscopy involves neuromotor skills which differ from those of open surgery, such as the principles of triangulation, bimanual dexterity, and the ability to navigate a three-dimensional space on a two-dimensional screen. There remains no universally implemented curriculum for arthroscopic education within orthopaedic residency or fellowship training programs, permitting the potential for highly variable training experiences from institution to institution. Therefore, the current review seeks to highlight the history of arthroscopic education, strategies and current teaching modalities in modern arthroscopic education, and avenues for future educational pathways.

Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Orthopaedic Residency Training: A National Survey.

The adoption of technology-assisted total joint arthroplasty (TA-TJA) is increasing; however, the extent to which TA-TJA is used among orthopaedic trainees is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the current use of TA total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) by orthopaedic residents and to evaluate resident perceptions toward TA-TJA in their surgical training. In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous electronic survey was sent to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency program coordinators to distribute to their PGY-2 to PGY-5 residents. The survey consisted of 24 questions, including resident demographics, utilization of TA-TJA in their training, and perceptions regarding TA-TJA. A total of 103 orthopaedic residents completed the survey, of whom 68.0% reported using TA-TJA at their institution. Of the residents using TA-TJA, 28.6% used TA for total TKA only, 71.4% used TA for both TKA and THA, and none used TA solely for THA. One-third of residents (33.3%) use TA for more than half of all TKAs conducted, whereas 57.0% use TA for <10% of all THAs conducted. Approximately half of all residents (49.5%) thought that training in TA-TJA should be required during residency, with no significant differences between junior and senior level residents ( P = 0.24). Most (82.0%) thought that trainees should be required to learn conventional TJA before learning TA-TJA. 63.0% thought that technology had a positive effect on their primary TJA training experience; however, 26.0% reported concern that their training conducting conventional TJA may be inadequate. This study demonstrates that most orthopaedic residents currently conduct TA-TJA and highlights notable differences in TJA training experiences. These results provide a platform for future work aimed at further optimizing TJA training in residency, particularly as technology continues to rapidly evolve and utilization of TA-TJA is projected to grow exponentially. N/A, survey-based study.

Health Literacy Awareness Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents: A COERG Survey.

This study was endorsed by the Collaborative Orthopaedic Education Research Group board. A 17-item questionnaire was administered anonymously to orthopaedic residents through a secure online platform in the 2020 to 2021 academic year. All participation was voluntary. One hundred ninety-two residents (42%) from 19 orthopaedic programs completed the survey. Most residents felt "somewhat comfortable" with issues related to HL. Most residents reported no specific training in HL issues during residency (77.5%). Of the 43 residents (22.3%) who did receive formal training, most of these individuals felt that the training is effective (N = 42, 97.7%). Role playing/standardized patient encounters were reported as the most effective form of HL training. Residents felt it was somewhat important to receive formal HL training in residency (median = 4.0, interquartile range = 3.0-5.0), and there was a modest desire for formalized training (39%). This study is the first to characterize orthopaedic resident perceptions of HL issues in practice and training. Residents were somewhat confident in their understanding of HL concepts, and those who received formal training felt it was effective. However, there remains a low rate of formal orthopaedic resident training in HL issues, which may be an area for improvement in orthopaedic training paradigms.

Fellowship-Trained Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons Achieve Better Postoperative Radiographic Parameters After Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures when Compared With Non-trauma-Trained Surgeons.

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures are common orthopaedic injuries accounting for nearly 30% of all fracture-related hospitalizations. Because many factors predictive of failure are related to technical aspects of the surgery, the purpose of this study was to compare radiographic parameters after fixation, comparing fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons with surgeons who did not complete an orthopaedic trauma fellowship. We initiated a search for CPT code 27245 across our hospital network to identify 100 consecutive patients treated by five fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists and 100 consecutive patients treated by community surgeons. Patients were then stratified based on their surgeon's subspecialty training (trauma vs community). Primary outcome variables were neck-shaft angle (NSA), a comparison of the repaired NSA with the uninjured side, tip-apex distance, and reduction quality. One hundred patients were included in each group. The mean age in the community group was 77 years compared with 79 years in the trauma group. The mean tip-apex distance for the trauma group was 10 mm compared with 21 mm for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean postoperative NSA for the trauma group was 133° compared with 127° for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean difference of the NSA of the repaired side compared with the uninjured side was 2.5° of valgus in the trauma group compared with 5° of varus for the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 93 good reductions in the trauma group compared with 19 in the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 0 poor reductions in the trauma group and 49 in the community group ( P < 0.001). Overall, we have shown that fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons achieve better reductions when treating intertrochanteric femur fractures with intramedullary nails. Orthopaedic residency training should emphasize teaching proper techniques and acceptable parameters for reduction and implant placement when treating geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures.