Orthopaedic Residency Training Research Articles

Metaverse, virtual reality and augmented reality in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

PurposeThis systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on the role of the metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.MethodsA systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive review of the applications of the metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality in in-vivo intraoperative navigation, in the training of orthopedic residents, and in the latest innovations proposed in ex-vivo studies was conducted.ResultsA total of 22 articles were included in the review. Data on navigated shoulder arthroplasty was extracted from 14 articles: seven hundred ninety-three patients treated with intraoperative navigated rTSA or aTSA were included. Also, three randomized control trials (RCTs) reported outcomes on a total of fifty-three orthopedics surgical residents and doctors receiving VR-based training for rTSA, which were also included in the review. Three studies reporting the latest VR and AR-based rTSA applications and two proof of concept studies were also included in the review.ConclusionsThe metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality present immense potential for the future of orthopedic surgery. As these technologies advance, it is crucial to conduct additional research, foster development, and seamlessly integrate them into surgical education to fully harness their capabilities and transform the field. This evolution promises enhanced accuracy, expanded training opportunities, and improved surgical planning capabilities.

Pregnancy and infertility in orthopedics: A review of the current state.

Orthopedic surgery continues to have one of the lowest rates of female trainees among all medical specialties in the United States. Barriers to pursuing a surgical residency include the challenges of family planning and work-life balance during training. A systematic literature search of articles published between June 2012 and December 2022 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed in January 2023 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis). Studies were included if they evaluated pregnancy and peripartum experience and/or outcomes amongst orthopedic surgeons or trainees. Eighteen studies were included. Up to 67.3% of female orthopedic surgeons and trainees and 38.7% of their male counterparts delayed childbearing during residency. The most reported reasons for this delay included career choice as an orthopedic surgeon, residency training, and reputational concerns among faculty or co-residents. Infertility ranged from 17.0% to 30.4% in female orthopedic surgeons and up to 31.2% suffered obstetric complications. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) resulted in 12.4%-56.3% of successful pregnancies. Maternity and paternity leaves ranged from 1 to 11weeks for trainees with more negative attitudes associated with maternal leave. Female orthopedic trainees and attending delay childbearing, experience higher rates of obstetric complications, and more stigma associated with pregnancy compared to their male colleagues. Program and institutional policies regarding maternity and paternity leave are variable across programs, and therefore, attention should be directed toward standardizing policies.

A Curricular Model for Simulation Within Orthopaedic Residency Training.

American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery/American Council on GraduateMedical Education Residency Review Committee training requirements have necessitated the need for the adoption of simulation education into existing programmatic requirements. Current guidelines focus only on interns at a potentially significant cost to programs; both in total dollar amount and time. The authors aim to provide a model that can maximize utility for all resident levels, manage cost by maximizing the use of cadaveric material, and allow integration of varied industry support. The Oregon Health & Science University Orthopaedic education program has developed a high-fidelity training curriculum that (1) is applicable to both junior and senior residents (2) has minimized the cost per resident with the reuse of cadaveric specimens and (3) has nurtured partnerships with industry stakeholders to reduce bias in training by collaborating with most major industry representatives. The simulation curriculum outlined in this manuscript may serve as a reference for other programs and institutions to develop their own residency educational curriculum models.

WHAT HAPPENED TO ORTHOPAEDIC RESIDENCY AND RESEARCH DURING THE PANDEMIC?

In March 2020, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The pandemic imposed drastic changes in our social and professional routine. Professionally at all levels our hospital tasks were changed and prioritized. Surgeons and residents were deployed on rotations to fields other than their expertise in orthopaedics. Health-care education received major changes in these challenging times, and students did face difficulties in receiving education, as well as training due to limited clinical and surgical exposure.In response to the WHO regulations, most of the teaching centres and hospitals worldwide have adopted the web-based teaching and learning model to continue the education and training of orthopaedic residents. These results brought significant changes to the training experience in orthopaedic surgery in combination with the fact that clinical duty hours and case volume were substantially reduced.In what concerns orthopaedic journal publications, the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a decline in the annual publication rate for the first time in over 20 years. Although not uniform, the reduction was most likely due to multifactorial causes.Regarding the appraisal at the end of training, at the Orthopaedic European Board Examination we were able to verify that the outcome at the written part 1 exam was good, equivalent to the outcome prior to the pandemic. However the oral viva was much worse, probably due to the fact that residents skipped much of the clinical and surgical teaching and exposure during 2020 and 2021. At the end of training, theoretical/factual knowledge was good but poor from the clinical practical experience.

Use of Social Media in Orthopaedic Surgery Training and Practice: A Systematic Review.

Social media use has grown across healthcare delivery and practice, with dramatic changes occurring in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review to determine the current landscape of social media use by (1) orthopaedic surgery residencies/fellowship training programs and (2) individual orthopaedic surgeons and the change in use over time. We searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase) from their inception to April 2022 for all studies that analyzed the use of social media in orthopaedic surgery. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality, and extracted data. Methodology was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twenty-eight studies were included, of which 11 analyzed social media use by orthopaedic surgery residency and fellowship training programs and 17 examined its use by individual orthopaedic surgeons. Among residency and fellowship programs, Instagram was identified as the most common platform used, with 42% to 88% of programs reporting program-specific Instagram accounts, followed by Twitter/X (20%-52%) and Facebook (10%-38%). Social media was most commonly used by programs for recruitment and information dissemination to prospective residency applicants (82% and 73% of included studies, respectively). After the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a 620% and 177% increase in the number of training programs with Instagram and Twitter/X accounts, respectively. Individual use of social media ranged from 1.7% to 76% (Twitter/X), 10% to 73% (Facebook), 0% to 61% (Instagram), 22% to 61% (LinkedIn), and 6.5% to 56% (YouTube). Instagram, Twitter/X, and Facebook are the premier platforms that patients, residency applicants, and institutions frequent. With the continued growth of social media use anticipated, it will be critical for institutions and individuals to create and abide by guidelines outlining respectful and professional integration of social media into practice. Level IV.

Can an Orthopedic Hip Fracture Simulator Advance Orthopedic Residents’ Hip Fracture Fixation Skills to an Expert Level?

This study was undertaken to evaluate hip fracture simulator training and orthopedic resident skill attainment. We hypothesized that after 6 training sessions, improvement in post-training scores in junior residents would exceed that of senior residents and that senior residents would attain expert level proficiency sooner. Thirty orthopedic residents from a single institution completed 6 training sessions. Sessions included a pretest, 9 training modules, and post-test. An expert score was obtained from the average scores of 8 trauma fellows and attending orthopedic traumatologists. The primary outcome measure was overall score. A single academic institution. Orthopedic residents (postgraduate years [PGYs] 1-5). Twenty-six residents completed the study. The mean overall post-training score was 87% of the expert level. Factors associated with post-training score changes were additional training sessions (4.2% improvement [p < 0.01]), time between training sessions (0.3% decrease [p = 0.05]) and PGY5 class (12.1% improvement [p = 0.03]). Fifty-four percent of residents attained the expert overall score. Expert score attainment was not associated with an additional year of training or case log volume. Post-training scores plateaued for the PGY1s and showed linear improvement for the PGY5s. Differences in trends between training levels suggest this simulator is a useful adjunct to a 5-year orthopedic residency training program.

An application and exploration of entrustable professional activities in Chinese orthopaedic postgraduate residents training: a pilot study

BackgroundThrough the standardization of residency training in certain Chinese medical education institutions, it was discovered that the current evaluation system falls short in accurately assessing residents’ professional skills in clinical practice. Therefore, we developed the list of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) in orthopaedic residency training to explore a new evaluation system.MethodsThe process of constructing EPAs includes seven steps. 40 orthopaedic residents were randomly assigned to two groups (20 in each). The experimental group used the EPAs evaluation system while the control group employed the traditional Mini Clinical Exercise (Mini-CEX) system. Post-residency, theoretical and practical tests were conducted to measure training effectiveness. Additionally, a survey gauged teaching satisfaction, knowledge mastery, and course engagement in both groups.ResultsThe control group scored an average of 76.05 ± 10.58, while the experimental group achieved 83.30 ± 8.69 (p &amp;lt; 0.05) on the combined theoretical and practical test. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning teaching satisfaction, knowledge mastery, and course engagement.ConclusionThe application of EPAs in orthopaedic residency training yielded higher theoretical and practical test scores compared to the traditional formative evaluation system. It also enhanced teaching satisfaction, knowledge mastery, and course engagement. The EPAs present a potential model for national orthopaedic residency training.

Orthopedic oncology residency education, how broad and how deep?

Orthopedic residency training has long been an area of active research and discussion, and as the knowledge and concepts in subspecialties evolve, it is crucial to investigate the implications of these advancements in the musculoskeletal oncology field. It is important to note that the acquisition of surgical skills and scientific knowledge from orthopedic texts alone is not sufficient in this area. Orthopedic residents must also acquire multidisciplinary communication and leadership skills, as well as the mental capacity to make sound clinical decisions. Therefore, this commentary highlights the importance of assessing whether the current curriculum provides adequate preparation for residents' future careers, despite the fact that the expansion of subspecialties in orthopedic education has undoubtedly enhanced the depth of knowledge and concepts in the field. In addition, orthopedic residents must adopt an open-minded and scientific approach toward orthopedic oncology, which has unique principles. Moreover, it is crucial that general orthopedic surgeons have the necessary skills to manage patients and know when to refer them. By exploring these issues, we hope to continually contribute to ongoing discussions about how to improve orthopedic residency education.

Resident involvement in hand and upper extremity surgery: An analysis of 30-day complications

BackgroundRotations in hand and upper extremity surgery are a core component of the Orthopaedic and Plastic Surgery resident training curriculums. This study compares short-term outcomes in hand and upper extremity procedures with and without resident involvement. MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from years 2005–2012 for all procedures distal to the shoulder. Patients were stratified based on whether a resident scrubbed for the procedure. Outcome measures were 30-day mortality, reoperation rate, minor complications, major complications, and length of stay (LOS). Chi-squared tests were used to determine significant variables. Significant variables were included in a binomial multivariate logistic regression model. ResultsA total of 7697 patients were included in the study. Of those, 4509 (59 %) had no resident, and 3188 (41 %) had a resident. Patients with resident involvement were less likely to be Caucasian, ASA classification 3 or higher, and outpatient. Cohorts were similar with respect to age, sex, and emergent status. Operative time was 15 min longer in resident cases. Work relative value units were higher in resident cases. In the multivariate logistic regression model, resident involvement had no statistically significant impact on LOS, mortality, reoperation rate, minor complications, or major complications. Subgroup analysis showed increased odds of superficial surgical site infections in resident cases, although this was statistically insignificant (OR 1.35, p = 0.24). ConclusionsHand and upper extremity procedures with resident involvement do not have any increase in overall adverse short-term outcomes. In appropriately selected cases, residents can participate without compromising patient safety.

Comparison of the Incidence of Orthopedic Trauma Cases Managed in A Tertiary Hospital in Western Visayas During The Pre Covid and Covid Period and Its Effect on The Different Orthopedic Residency Training Program In The Region: A comparative study

Comparison of the Incidence of Orthopedic Trauma Cases Managed in A Tertiary Hospital in Western Visayas During The Pre Covid and Covid Period and Its Effect on The Different Orthopedic Residency Training Program In The Region: A comparative study

Tourniquet Practice Among Orthopaedic Surgeons in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of tourniquet use among orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia and assess the practical aspects of their use of tourniquets and the complications they have experienced in their practices. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to February 2023. An online questionnaire was distributed among orthopedic surgeons and trainees in Saudi Arabia, and the surgeons' knowledge of tourniquet use was assessed using 17 questions. To investigate tourniquet usage, the participants were divided into three groups: orthopedic residents, specialists, and consultants. An upper limb cuff pressure (CP) of 200 mmHg and a lower limb CP of 250 mmHg were chosen as the cut-off values, and the doctors' choices were compared against literature recommendations using these measures. Result A total of 205 participants filled out the questionnaires; 130 residents, 15 consultants, and 60 specialists, with more males (175/205) than females responding. One hundred and twenty-one surgeons placed the cuff on patients by themselves, while 50 (24.3%) surgeons asked nurses for aid; 135 (65.6%) of them work in teaching hospitals, while 50 (24.3%) work in community hospitals. The incidence of post-tourniquet syndrome was unrelated to expertise (p=0.12). Conclusion When applied properly, tourniquets prevent excessive bleeding and keep the operative field clean during limb surgeries. This study aims to inspire the orthopedic community to reconsider long-held practices, especially regarding tourniquet pressure. The addition of ligature safety education to orthopedics training and outlining the settings and procedures for applying pressure should also be considered. The orthopedic community should set CP and process criteria to avoid complications. This study showed the importance of modifying the training of orthopedic residents to raise awareness and prevent unpleasant events from occurring.

Arthroscopic Training: Historical Insights and Future Directions.

Arthroscopy is an orthopaedic technique that provides surgical solutions in a minimally invasive fashion. Since its introduction, arthroscopy has become a preferred surgical approach for treating various orthopaedic pathologies, such as meniscal tears, anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, rotator cuff tears, and wrist, elbow, ankle, and hip conditions. Despite its ubiquity, surgical training in arthroscopy poses several challenges for educators and trainees. Arthroscopy involves neuromotor skills which differ from those of open surgery, such as the principles of triangulation, bimanual dexterity, and the ability to navigate a three-dimensional space on a two-dimensional screen. There remains no universally implemented curriculum for arthroscopic education within orthopaedic residency or fellowship training programs, permitting the potential for highly variable training experiences from institution to institution. Therefore, the current review seeks to highlight the history of arthroscopic education, strategies and current teaching modalities in modern arthroscopic education, and avenues for future educational pathways.

Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Orthopaedic Residency Training: A National Survey.

The adoption of technology-assisted total joint arthroplasty (TA-TJA) is increasing; however, the extent to which TA-TJA is used among orthopaedic trainees is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the current use of TA total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) by orthopaedic residents and to evaluate resident perceptions toward TA-TJA in their surgical training. In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous electronic survey was sent to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency program coordinators to distribute to their PGY-2 to PGY-5 residents. The survey consisted of 24 questions, including resident demographics, utilization of TA-TJA in their training, and perceptions regarding TA-TJA. A total of 103 orthopaedic residents completed the survey, of whom 68.0% reported using TA-TJA at their institution. Of the residents using TA-TJA, 28.6% used TA for total TKA only, 71.4% used TA for both TKA and THA, and none used TA solely for THA. One-third of residents (33.3%) use TA for more than half of all TKAs conducted, whereas 57.0% use TA for <10% of all THAs conducted. Approximately half of all residents (49.5%) thought that training in TA-TJA should be required during residency, with no significant differences between junior and senior level residents ( P = 0.24). Most (82.0%) thought that trainees should be required to learn conventional TJA before learning TA-TJA. 63.0% thought that technology had a positive effect on their primary TJA training experience; however, 26.0% reported concern that their training conducting conventional TJA may be inadequate. This study demonstrates that most orthopaedic residents currently conduct TA-TJA and highlights notable differences in TJA training experiences. These results provide a platform for future work aimed at further optimizing TJA training in residency, particularly as technology continues to rapidly evolve and utilization of TA-TJA is projected to grow exponentially. N/A, survey-based study.

Fellowship-Trained Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons Achieve Better Postoperative Radiographic Parameters After Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures when Compared With Non-trauma-Trained Surgeons.

Intertrochanteric femoral fractures are common orthopaedic injuries accounting for nearly 30% of all fracture-related hospitalizations. Because many factors predictive of failure are related to technical aspects of the surgery, the purpose of this study was to compare radiographic parameters after fixation, comparing fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons with surgeons who did not complete an orthopaedic trauma fellowship. We initiated a search for CPT code 27245 across our hospital network to identify 100 consecutive patients treated by five fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists and 100 consecutive patients treated by community surgeons. Patients were then stratified based on their surgeon's subspecialty training (trauma vs community). Primary outcome variables were neck-shaft angle (NSA), a comparison of the repaired NSA with the uninjured side, tip-apex distance, and reduction quality. One hundred patients were included in each group. The mean age in the community group was 77 years compared with 79 years in the trauma group. The mean tip-apex distance for the trauma group was 10 mm compared with 21 mm for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean postoperative NSA for the trauma group was 133° compared with 127° for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean difference of the NSA of the repaired side compared with the uninjured side was 2.5° of valgus in the trauma group compared with 5° of varus for the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 93 good reductions in the trauma group compared with 19 in the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 0 poor reductions in the trauma group and 49 in the community group ( P < 0.001). Overall, we have shown that fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons achieve better reductions when treating intertrochanteric femur fractures with intramedullary nails. Orthopaedic residency training should emphasize teaching proper techniques and acceptable parameters for reduction and implant placement when treating geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Acquisition of Medical Knowledge Varies During Allopathic and Osteopathic Orthopedic Surgery Residency Training.

Currently, little is known about the differences in medical knowledge acquisition between osteopathic and allopathic orthopedic surgery residents. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) performance and training pathway in orthopedic surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study of all orthopedic surgery residents taking the OITE during the 2019-2020 academic year. Comparisons in OITE performance were made with parametric tests. A total of 4407 orthopedic surgery residents were in allopathic (86%) and osteopathic (14%) training programs. There was significant improvement in OITE performance between subsequent postgraduate year (PGY) levels among allopathic residents (P<.001). Among osteopathic residents, OITE performance increased between PGY1 and PGY4 (P<.001) but plateaued between PGY4 and PGY5 (P>.05). At the PGY1 level, osteopathic residents had higher OITE performance than allopathic residents (P<.001), but scores were equivalent at the PGY2 to PGY4 levels (P>.05). At the PGY5 level, allopathic residents had higher OITE performance than osteopathic residents (P<.001). Allopathic medical students scored higher on the Step 1 (248±19 vs 242±17, P<.001) and Step 2 (255±16 vs 250±15, P<.001) board examinations. Medical knowledge increases during orthopedic surgery residency. Disparities exist by training pathway, with osteopathic residents outperforming allopathic residents at the PGY1 level but then underperforming at the PGY5 level. Ultimately, this study provides insights into how resident promotion and training pathway impacts the acquisition of medical knowledge during orthopedic surgery residency. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):379-383.].

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthopedic Surgery Residency Training.

This study sought to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on orthopedic surgery residency training across the United States. A 26-question online survey was created and sent to all orthopedic surgery residency programs across the United States. Areas of emphasis in the survey included the pandemic's effect on work hours, operative experience, didactics, and medical student recruitment. There were 142 respondents to the survey. One hundred seventeen (82.4%) respondents stated that their residency changed to an alternative/surge schedule during the pandemic. Regarding the degree to which the pandemic affected their training, 77 (54.2%) respondents gave a rating of 8 to 10 on a scale of 0 to 10. Similarly, 94 (66.2%) residents indicated that their operative experience had decreased significantly. Twenty-two (15.5%) residents expected that their next year clinical abilities would not be affected. One hundred thirty-seven (96.5%) residents stated their program transitioned to online didactics. Responses regarding the effectiveness of online didactics were mixed. One hundred twenty-six (88.7%) respondents stated the pandemic would negatively affect the 2021 National Residency Matching Program match. This study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic greatly affected orthopedic surgery residency training in the United States. Resident operative experience decreased significantly, and most respondents indicated a switch to online didactics. Effects were also felt to extend to fourth-year scheduling and the 2021 National Residency Matching Program match. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):315-319.].

Smart Phone Chat Apps for Teaching and Assessment in Orthopaedic Residency Training.

Smart Phone Chat Apps (SPCA) is an integral part of people's daily routine including orthopaedic education. SPCA facilitates efficient communication and learner-based management especially now as remote flexible learning is becoming the new norm in this COVID-19 pandemic medical training. The study described the use of a chat app (Viber) as experienced by residents and consultants in the Section of Adult Orthopaedics of the institution of the principal author. It described the mode and dynamics of the chat discussion amongst its participants, its perceived usefulness in teaching and learning specifically its relevance and applicability, its potential as a supplementary assessment tool, as well as its perceived effects. This is a phenomenological study and strictly adhered to data privacy. The principal author conducted a participant observation of residents' three-month clinical rotation at the study site. Mobile phone screenshots of the chat interactions and focus group discussions with consultants and residents were done. Residents were also requested to complete a questionnaire. All qualitative data were iteratively content analysed and emerging themes were summarised using NViVO-12. Frequencies and percentage distribution were used to analyse quantitative data. Respondents included eleven senior, four junior residents, and nine consultants. Results show that SPCA is a useful, applicable, and relevant teaching and assessment tool. Influxes of multiple ideas per case were discussed real-time as the chat exchanges and interactions helped in the planning of the surgical management and eventual decision-making. SPCA also served as an effective surgical case log and online library, as well as an efficient, rapid, economical mode of information dissemination. The residents reported that it helped in developing their emotional maturity through self-reflection and self-criticism in the performance of their cases. The consultants concurred and added that they too were updated professionally in certain fields in orthopaedics. Conclusion: The SPCA is a helpful, relevant, and acceptable adjunct teaching and learning tool for clinical teaching and can be, to a certain extent, a supplementary formative assessment tool of the resident's communication skills, work ethics, initiative, and diligence.

Perception of orthopedic residents about their residency training programs in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Background: Orthopedic residency training in Saudi Arabia is critical for producing skilled physicians who can diagnose and treat musculoskeletal disorders effectively. However, the perception of orthopedic residents regarding their training programs remains unclear. This study, conducted during the 2022-2023 academic year, aimed to explore orthopedic residents&amp;apos; perceptions in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, regarding their training programs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey gathered data from 130 orthopedic residents, predominantly male, with an average age of 28.07 years. The largest representation came from the Prince Sultan Military Medical City, making up 23.1% of participants. The survey covered residents&amp;apos; views on academic activities, surgical training, trainers, and the training environment. Results: Findings revealed varying perceptions among residents. Some expressed concerns about having enough time for reading, studying, attending conferences, seminars, and exposure to diverse cases. Trainers received mixed reviews, with most residents finding them approachable, knowledgeable, and cognizant of residents&amp;apos; abilities and needs. The training environment generally appeared healthy and friendly, although opinions on daily workload and on-call numbers were mixed. Notably, R2 residents had the most positive perception of trainers, with a mean score of 21.93. Overall, the majority of residents expressed satisfaction with their training program. Conclusion: This study sheds light on the strengths and weaknesses of orthopedic training programs from the residents&amp;apos; perspective. Opportunities for improvement include enhancing support for self-directed learning, skill development, mentorship for trainers, workload management, and exploring rotational alternatives. Addressing disagreements and implementing anonymous impression surveys can enhance the educational experience for orthopedic residents in Saudi Arabia.

Arthroscopy and orthopedic residency: a cross-sectional study of training structure in a resource-constrained environment.

orthopedic residency training was established in the West African sub-region a few decades ago, but sub-specialty in arthroscopy has only become established in the last decade. This study was aimed at evaluating available arthroscopy training resources and their impact on skill acquisition by orthopedic residents. this was a cross-sectional study involving the use of a structured online survey of consultant orthopedic surgeons and orthopedic resident doctors. Details relating to the structure of training and challenges with training and recommendations for improved training were enquired. one hundred and two responses were received. There were 95% males (73) and 5% (4) females among the residents and 92% (23) males and 8% (2) females among the responding consultants. Of the residents, 47% (36) were registrars while 53% (41) were senior registrars. Seventy-six percent (77) were residents and twenty-five (24%) were consultants. Didactic lectures were the most impactful available training adjunct. Only 3% (2) of the residents had access to dry laboratory sessions with no specified number of practice hours attached. There was no computer simulation laboratory or cadaveric laboratory training facility for arthroscopy training in any of the training centres. Ninety-two percent (23) of the responding consultants would prefer a 6-12-month rotation in arthroscopy for residents. Fifty-three percent (41) of the residents had regular opportunities to participate in arthroscopic surgeries. orthopedic residency in arthroscopy in Nigeria is emerging and can be improved upon by increasing the available training resources and trained personnel.

Teaching of Cost-Effective Care in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Training: A Survey of Residency Programs in the US.

A survey was developed that was sent to orthopaedic residency program leadership via email through their interaction with the COERG. Additional programs were included to enhance diversity of responding programs. The survey, based on those published from other areas of medicine, included questions about the experiences of the respondents in learning about cost-effective care, as well as how faculty and residents learned about this topic. Seventy one percent (30) of respondents noted that their faculty did not receive formal training in cost-effective care, and education in this area was likely to come from the department, especially review of practice data (12, 44%). Only 19% (8) of respondents agreed with the statement that "the majority of teaching faculty in our program consistently model cost-effective healthcare to residents". Few of the programs (10, 24%) had formal curricula for residents regarding cost-effective care, and the primary mode of education in cost-effective care was through informal discussions with faculty (17, 43%). Few residents (3, 13%) were able to easily find the costs of tests or procedures. There is not consistent education in cost-effective care for orthopaedic surgery program leadership, faculty, or trainees. The results of this survey demonstrate a need for discussion of best practices, including increasing access to cost data at a local level, and engaging with the AOA, CORD, and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons more broadly in the development of standard education modules for faculty and residents, to improve the current and future delivery of cost-effective musculoskeletal care.