Origin Of Genetic Code Research Articles

Origins of Genetic Coding: Self-Guided Molecular Self-Organisation.

The origin of genetic coding is characterised as an event of cosmic significance in which quantum mechanical causation was transcended by constructive computation. Computational causation entered the physico-chemical processes of the pre-biotic world by the incidental satisfaction of a condition of reflexivity between polymer sequence information and system elements able to facilitate their own production through translation of that information. This event, which has previously been modelled in the dynamics of Gene-Replication-Translation systems, is properly described as a process of self-guided self-organisation. The spontaneous emergence of a primordial genetic code between two-letter alphabets of nucleotide triplets and amino acids is easily possible, starting with random peptide synthesis that is RNA-sequence-dependent. The evident self-organising mechanism is the simultaneous quasi-species bifurcation of the populations of information-carrying genes and enzymes with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-like activities. This mechanism allowed the code to evolve very rapidly to the ~20 amino acid limit apparent for the reflexive differentiation of amino acid properties using protein catalysts. The self-organisation of semantics in this domain of physical chemistry conferred on emergent molecular biology exquisite computational control over the nanoscopic events needed for its self-construction.

Why Were [GADV]-amino Acids and GNC Codons Selected and How Was GNC Primeval Genetic Code Established?

Correspondence relations between codons and amino acids are determined by genetic code. Therefore, genetic code holds a key of the life system composed of genes and protein. According to the GNC-SNS primitive genetic code hypothesis, which I have proposed, it is assumed that the genetic code originated from GNC code. In this article, first, it is discussed from a standpoint of primeval protein synthesis, why four [GADV]-amino acids were selected and used in the first GNC code. Next, it is explained from another standpoint of the most primitive anticodon-stem loop tRNAs (AntiC-SL tRNAs), how four GNCs were selected for the first codons. Furthermore, in the last section of this article, I will explain my idea of how the correspondence relations between four [GADV]-amino acids and four GNC codons were established. Namely, the origin and evolution of the genetic code was discussed comprehensively from several aspects of [GADV]-proteins, [GADV]-amino acids, GNC codons, and anticodon stem-loop tRNAs (AntiC-SL tRNAs), which relate each other to the origin of the genetic code, as integrating GNC code frozen-accident theory, coevolution theory, and adaptive theory on the origin of the genetic code.

The Origin of Genetic Code and Translation in the Framework of Current Concepts on the Origin of Life.

The origin of genetic code and translation system is probably the central and most difficult problem in the investigations on the origin of life and one of the most complex problems in the evolutionary biology in general. There are multiple hypotheses on the emergence and development of existing genetic systems that propose the mechanisms for the origin and early evolution of genetic code, as well as for the emergence of replication and translation. Here, we discuss the most well-known of these hypotheses, although none of them provides a description of the early evolution of genetic systems without gaps and assumptions. The RNA world hypothesis is a currently prevailing scientific idea on the early evolution of biological and pre-biological structures, the main advantage of which is the assumption that RNAs as the first living systems were self-sufficient, i.e., capable of functioning as both catalysts and templates. However, this hypothesis has also significant limitations. In particular, no ribozymes with processive polymerase activity have been yet discovered or synthesized. Taking into account the mutual need of proteins and nucleic acids in each other in the current world, many authors propose the early evolution scenarios based on the co-evolution of these two classes of organic molecules. They postulate that the emergence of translation was necessary for the replication of nucleic acids, in contrast to the RNA world hypothesis, according to which the emergence of translation was preceded by the era of self-replicating RNAs. Although such scenarios are less parsimonious from the evolutionary point of view, since they require simultaneous emergence and evolution of two classes of organic molecules, as well as the emergence of synchronized replication and translation, their major advantage is that they explain the development of processive and much more accurate protein-dependent replication.

The genetic code is very close to a global optimum in a model of its origin taking into account both the partition energy of amino acids and their biosynthetic relationships

We used the Moran's I index of global spatial autocorrelation with the aim of studying the distribution of the physicochemical or biological properties of amino acids within the genetic code table. First, using this index we are able to identify the amino acid property - among the 530 analyzed - that best correlates with the organization of the genetic code in the set of amino acid permutation codes. Considering, then, a model suggested by the coevolution theory of the genetic code origin - which in addition to the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids took into account also their physicochemical properties - we investigated the level of optimization achieved by these properties either on the entire genetic code table, or only on its columns or only on its rows. Specifically, we estimated the optimization achieved in the restricted set of amino acid permutation codes subject to the constraints derived from the biosynthetic classes of amino acids, in which we identify the most optimized amino acid property among all those present in the database. Unlike what has been claimed in the literature, it would appear that it was not the polarity of amino acids that structured the genetic code, but that it could have been their partition energy instead. In actual fact, it would seem to reach an optimization level of about 96% on the whole table of the genetic code and 98% on its columns. Given that this result has been obtained for amino acid permutation codes subject to biosynthetic constraints, that is to say, for a model of the genetic code consistent with the coevolution theory, we should consider the following conclusions reasonable. (i) The coevolution theory might be corroborated by these observations because the model used referred to the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids, which are suggested by this theory as having been fundamental in structuring the genetic code. (ii) The very high optimization on the columns of the genetic code would not only be compatible but would further corroborate the coevolution theory because this suggests that, as the genetic code was structured along its rows by the biosynthetic relationships of amino acids, on its columns strong selective pressure might have been put in place to minimize, for example, the deleterious effects of translation errors. (iii) The finding that partition energy could be the most optimized property of amino acids in the genetic code would in turn be consistent with one of the main predictions of the coevolution theory. Since the partition energy is reflective of the protein structure and therefore of the enzymatic catalysis, the latter might really have been the main selective pressure that would have promoted the origin of the genetic code. Indeed, we observe that the β-strands show an optimization percentage of 95.45%; so it is possible to hypothesize that they might have become the object of selection during the origin of the genetic code, conditioning the choice of biosynthetic relationships between amino acids. (iv) The finding that the polarity of amino acids is less optimized than their partition energy in the genetic code table might be interpreted against the physicochemical theories of the origin of the genetic code because these would suggest, for example, that a very high optimization of the polarity of amino acids in the code could be an expression of interactions between amino acids and codons or anticodons, which would have promoted its origin. This might now become less sustainable, given the very high optimization that is instead observed in favor of the partition energy but not polarity. Finally, (v) the very high optimization of the partition energy of amino acids would seem to make a neutral origin of error minimization, i.e. of the ability of the genetic code to buffer, for example, the deleterious effects of translation errors, very unlikely. Indeed, an optimization of about 100% would seem that it might not have been achieved by a simple neutral process, but this ability should probably have been generated instead by the intervention of natural selection. In actual fact, we show that the neutral theory of the origin of error minimization has been falsified for the model analyzed here. Therefore, we will discuss our observations within the theories proposed to explain the origin of the organization of the genetic code, reaching the conclusion that the coevolution theory is the most strongly corroborated theory.

Factors in Protobiomonomer Selection for the Origin of the Standard Genetic Code.

Natural selection of specific protobiomonomers during abiogenic development of the prototype genetic code is hindered by the diversity of structural, spatial, and rotational isomers that have identical elemental composition and molecular mass (M), but can vary significantly in their physicochemical characteristics, such as the melting temperature Tm, the Tm:M ratio, and the solubility in water, due to different positions of atoms in the molecule. These parameters differ between cis- and trans-isomers of dicarboxylic acids, spatial monosaccharide isomers, and structural isomers of α-, β-, and γ-amino acids. The stable planar heterocyclic molecules of the major nucleobases comprise four (C, H, N, O) or three (C, H, N) elements and contain a single -C=C bond and two nitrogen atoms in each heterocycle involved in C-N and C=N bonds. They exist as isomeric resonance hybrids of single and double bonds and as a mixture of tautomer forms due to the presence of -C=O and/or -NH2 side groups. They are thermostable, insoluble in water, and exhibit solid-state stability, which is of central importance for DNA molecules as carriers of genetic information. In M-Tm diagrams, proteinogenic amino acids and the corresponding codons are distributed fairly regularly relative to the distinct clusters of purine and pyrimidine bases, reflecting the correspondence between codons and amino acids that was established in different periods of genetic code development. The body of data on the evolution of the genetic code system indicates that the elemental composition and molecular structure of protobiomonomers, and their M, Tm, photostability, and aqueous solubility determined their selection in the emergence of the standard genetic code.

Prebiotic Chemistry in Aqueous Environment: A Review of Peptide Synthesis and Its Relationship with Genetic Code

AbstractPrebiotic peptide synthesis and the origin of the genetic code are central issues concerning the origin of life. The question of how they are possibly correlated on the primordial Earth remains perplexing, although numerous experiments have been carried out to explain the prebiotic chemistry of peptide synthesis and the genetic code origin. The purpose of this article is to review the chemical reactions occurred during the synthesis of peptides and the origin of the genetic code in the early Earth aqueous environment. Meanwhile, we attempt to review their relationship as well. At last, from our perspective, the chiral properties of biomolecules should be taken into account in the prebiotic chemical scenarios, which may contribute to some breakthroughs in the further research of this field.

Combinatorial Fusion Rules to Describe Codon Assignment in the Standard Genetic Code

We propose combinatorial fusion rules that describe the codon assignment in the standard genetic code simply and uniformly for all canonical amino acids. These rules become obvious if the origin of the standard genetic code is considered as a result of a fusion of four protocodes: Two dominant AU and GC protocodes and two recessive AU and GC protocodes. The biochemical meaning of the fusion rules consists of retaining the complementarity between cognate codons of the small hydrophobic amino acids and large charged or polar amino acids within the protocodes. The proto tRNAs were assembled in form of two kissing hairpins with 9-base and 10-base loops in the case of dominant protocodes and two 9-base loops in the case of recessive protocodes. The fusion rules reveal the connection between the stop codons, the non-canonical amino acids, pyrrolysine and selenocysteine, and deviations in the translation of mitochondria. Using fusion rules, we predicted the existence of additional amino acids that are essential for the development of the standard genetic code. The validity of the proposed partition of the genetic code into dominant and recessive protocodes is considered referring to state-of-the-art hypotheses. The formation of two aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase classes is compatible with four-protocode partition.

Impedance Matching and the Choice Between Alternative Pathways for the Origin of Genetic Coding.

We recently observed that errors in gene replication and translation could be seen qualitatively to behave analogously to the impedances in acoustical and electronic energy transducing systems. We develop here quantitative relationships necessary to confirm that analogy and to place it into the context of the minimization of dissipative losses of both chemical free energy and information. The formal developments include expressions for the information transferred from a template to a new polymer, Iσ; an impedance parameter, Z; and an effective alphabet size, neff; all of which have non-linear dependences on the fidelity parameter, q, and the alphabet size, n. Surfaces of these functions over the {n,q} plane reveal key new insights into the origin of coding. Our conclusion is that the emergence and evolutionary refinement of information transfer in biology follow principles previously identified to govern physical energy flows, strengthening analogies (i) between chemical self-organization and biological natural selection, and (ii) between the course of evolutionary trajectories and the most probable pathways for time-dependent transitions in physics. Matching the informational impedance of translation to the four-letter alphabet of genes uncovers a pivotal role for the redundancy of triplet codons in preserving as much intrinsic genetic information as possible, especially in early stages when the coding alphabet size was small.

Circular Tessera Codes in the Evolution of the Genetic Code

The origin of the modern genetic code and the mechanisms that have contributed to its present form raise many questions. The main goal of this work is to test two hypotheses concerning the development of the genetic code for their compatibility and complementarity and see if they could benefit from each other. On the one hand, Gonzalez, Giannerini and Rosa developed a theory, based on four-based codons, which they called tesserae. This theory can explain the degeneracy of the modern vertebrate mitochondrial code. On the other hand, in the 1990s, so-called circular codes were discovered in nature, which seem to ensure the maintenance of a correct reading-frame during the translation process. It turns out that the two concepts not only do not contradict each other, but on the contrary complement and enrichen each other.

Class I and II aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetase tRNA groove discrimination created the first synthetase–tRNA cognate pairs and was therefore essential to the origin of genetic coding

The genetic code likely arose when a bidirectional gene replicating as a quasi-species began to produce ancestral aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) capable of distinguishing between two distinct sets of amino acids. The synthetase class division therefore necessarily implies a mechanism by which the two ancestral synthetases could also discriminate between two different kinds of tRNA substrates. We used regression methods to uncover the possible patterns of base sequences capable of such discrimination and find that they appear to be related to thermodynamic differences in the relative stabilities of a hairpin necessary for recognition of tRNA substrates by Class I aaRS. The thermodynamic differences appear to be exploited by secondary structural differences between models for the ancestral aaRS called synthetase Urzymes and reinforced by packing of aromatic amino acid side chains against the nonpolar face of the ribose of A76 if and only if the tRNA CCA sequence forms a hairpin. The patterns of bases 1, 2, and 73 and stabilization of the hairpin by structural complementarity with Class I, but not Class II, aaRS Urzymes appear to be necessary and sufficient to have enabled the generation of the first two aaRS-tRNA cognate pairs, and the launch of a rudimentary binary genetic coding related recognizably to contemporary cognate pairs. As a consequence, it seems likely that nonrandom aminoacylation of tRNAs preceded the advent of the tRNA anticodon stem-loop. Consistent with this suggestion, coding rules in the acceptor-stem bases also reveal a palimpsest of the codon-anticodon interaction, as previously proposed. © 2019 IUBMB Life, 2019 © 2019 IUBMB Life, 71(8):1088-1098, 2019.

Bias for 3'-Dominant Codon Directional Asymmetry in Theoretical Minimal RNA Rings.

Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases ligate tRNAs specifically with their cognate amino acid. These synthetases are among life's earliest proteins, class II tRNA synthetases (cognates A, D, F, G, H, K, N, P, S, and T) presumably preceding class I tRNA synthetases (cognates C, E, I, L, M, Q, R, V, W, and Y). Classification of codons into palindromic (structure XYX), 5'-dominant (YXX), and 3'-dominant (XXY) (Codon Directional Asymmetry [CDA]) shows that class II tRNA synthetases aminoacylate amino acids associated with XXY. Our working hypothesis expects bias for XXY codons in primordial RNAs, such as theoretical minimal RNA rings, designed in silico to mimic life's earliest RNAs. Twenty-five RNA rings have been computed, which code over a minimal length (22 nucleotides) for a start codon, stop codon, and one and only one codon for each of the 20 amino acids, and form stem-loop hairpins preventing degradation; these 25 minimal RNAs are the only ones matching these constraints and they seem homologous to consensus tRNA sequences. This similarity defined candidate RNA ring anticodons and corresponding cognate amino acids. Here, analyses of RNA ring codon contents confirm bias for XXY codons in 13 among 14 RNA rings with unequal XXY and YXX codon numbers. This bias increases with the genetic code integration order of the RNA ring's cognate amino acid across and within tRNA synthetase classes, suggesting that evolutionary processes, and not physicochemical constraints, produced the association between CDA and tRNA synthetase classes. The self-referential hypothesis for genetic code origin, a very complete genetic code evolutionary hypothesis integrating many translational machinery components, predicts best among genetic code evolutionary hypotheses CDA biases in RNA rings. The RNA rings' simple design inadvertently reproduces CDAs predicted by the genetic code's structure, confirming theoretical minimal RNA rings as good proxies for life's earliest RNAs.

The Smooth Evolution of the Universal Genetic Code. Main Episodes

The possible scenario of the origin and evolution of genetic code is proposed, being primarily implicated by the working hypothesis which states that the chronological order of amino acids evolutionary implementation monotonically correlates with their increasing mass. It fulfills the minimalistic claim of the smallest changes of the evolving system at increasing complexity, hereinafter called

Origin of the simplest genetic code as an evolutionary stage of the Earth

The minimal set of conditions is found under which a primitive genetic code can be formed in the chemical world in which polypeptides and polynucleotides can be produced. Molecular modeling demonstrates that multiple cycles of synthesis and thermal destruction of biopolymers result in spontaneous complication of their structure. This evolutionary progressive complication of polypeptides and polynucleotides coding them results in certain specific functions of the polypeptides, which are similar to properties of enzymes. Computer simulations confirm the internal logical consistency of the simplified scenario suggested for the origin of a genetic code as a process of transferring information on the structure of biomolecules to the historical future, in spite of the continuous thermal decomposition of these structures.

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases had only a marginal role in the origin of the organization of the genetic code: Evidence in favor of the coevolution theory

The coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code suggests that the organization of the genetic code coevolved with the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids. The mechanism that allowed this coevolution was based on tRNA-like molecules on which—this theory—would postulate the biosynthetic transformations between amino acids to have occurred. This mechanism makes a prediction on how the role conducted by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs), in the origin of the genetic code, should have been. Indeed, if the biosynthetic transformations between amino acids occurred on tRNA-like molecules, then there was no need to link amino acids to these molecules because amino acids were already charged on tRNA-like molecules, as the coevolution theory suggests. In spite of the fact that ARSs make the genetic code responsible for the first interaction between a component of nucleic acids and that of proteins, for the coevolution theory the role of ARSs should have been entirely marginal in the genetic code origin. Therefore, I have conducted a further analysis of the distribution of the two classes of ARSs and of their subclasses—in the genetic code table—in order to perform a falsification test of the coevolution theory. Indeed, in the case in which the distribution of ARSs within the genetic code would have been highly significant, then the coevolution theory would be falsified since the mechanism on which it is based would not predict a fundamental role of ARSs in the origin of the genetic code. I found that the statistical significance of the distribution of the two classes of ARSs in the table of the genetic code is low or marginal, whereas that of the subclasses of ARSs statistically significant. However, this is in perfect agreement with the postulates of the coevolution theory. Indeed, the only case of statistical significance—regarding the classes of ARSs—is appreciable for the CAG code, whereas for its complement—the UNN/NUN code—only a marginal significance is measurable. These two codes codify roughly for the two ARS classes, in particular, the CAG code for the class II while the UNN/NUN code for the class I. Furthermore, the subclasses of ARSs show a statistical significance of their distribution in the genetic code table. Nevertheless, the more sensible explanation for these observations would be the following. The observation that would link the two classes of ARSs to the CAG and UNN/NUN codes, and the statistical significance of the distribution of the subclasses of ARSs in the genetic code table, would be only a secondary effect due to the highly significant distribution of the polarity of amino acids and their biosynthetic relationships in the genetic code. That is to say, the polarity of amino acids and their biosynthetic relationships would have conditioned the evolution of ARSs so that their presence in the genetic code would have been detectable. Even if the ARSs would not have—on their own—influenced directly the evolutionary organization of the genetic code. In other words, the role that ARSs had in the origin of the genetic code would have been entirely marginal. This conclusion would be in perfect accord with the predictions of the coevolution theory. Conversely, this conclusion would be in contrast—at least partially—with the physicochemical theories of the origin of the genetic code because they would foresee an absolutely more active role of ARSs in the origin of the organization of the genetic code.

The origin of genetic codes: from energy transformation to informatization

The origin of genetic codes: from energy transformation to informatization

Some pungent arguments against the physico-chemical theories of the origin of the genetic code and corroborating the coevolution theory

Whereas it is extremely easy to prove that “if the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids were fundamental in the structuring of the genetic code, then their physico-chemical properties might also be revealed in the genetic code table”; it is, on the contrary, impossible to prove that “if the physico-chemical properties of amino acids were fundamental in the structuring of the genetic code, then the presence of the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids should not be revealed in the genetic code”. And, given that in the genetic code table are mirrored both the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids and their physico-chemical properties, all this would be a test that would falsify the physico-chemical theories of the origin of the genetic code. That is to say, if the physico-chemical properties of amino acids had a fundamental role in organizing the genetic code, then we would not have duly revealed the presence – in the genetic code – of the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids, and on the contrary this has been observed. Therefore, this falsifies the physico-chemical theories of genetic code origin. Whereas, the coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code would be corroborated by this analysis, because it would be able to give a description of evolution of the genetic code more coherent with the indisputable empirical observations that link both the biosynthetic relationships of amino acids and their physico-chemical properties to the evolutionary organization of the genetic code.

An Autotrophic Origin for the Coded Amino Acids is Concordant with the Coevolution Theory of the Genetic Code

The coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code maintains that the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids co-evolved with the genetic code organization. In other words, the metabolism of amino acids co-evolved with the organization of the genetic code because the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids occurred on tRNA-like molecules. Thus, a heterotrophic origin of amino acids-also only of those involved in the early phase of the structuring of the genetic code-would seem to contradict the main postulate of the coevolution theory. As a matter of fact, this origin not being linked to the metabolism of amino acids in any way-being taken from a physical setting-would seem to remove the possibility that this metabolism had instead heavily contributed to the structuring of the genetic code. Therefore, I have analyzed the structure of the genetic code and mechanisms that brought to its structuring for understanding if the coevolution theory is compatible with autotrophic or heterotrophic conditions. One of the arguments was that an autotrophic origin of amino acids would have the advantage to be able to directly link their metabolism to the structure of the genetic code if-as hypothesized by the coevolution theory-the biosyntheses of amino acids occurred on tRNA-like molecules. Simultaneously, a heterotrophic origin would not have been able to link the metabolism of amino acids to the structure of the genetic code for the absence of a precise determinism of allocation of amino acids, that is to say of a clear mechanism-linked to tRNA-like molecules, for example-that would have determined the specific pattern observed in the genetic code of the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids. The conclusion is that an autotrophic origin of coded amino acids would seem to be the condition under which the genetic code originated.

Synthetic transitions: towards a new synthesis.

The evolution of life in our biosphere has been marked by several major innovations. Such major complexity shifts include the origin of cells, genetic codes or multicellularity to the emergence of non-genetic information, language or even consciousness. Understanding the nature and conditions for their rise and success is a major challenge for evolutionary biology. Along with data analysis, phylogenetic studies and dedicated experimental work, theoretical and computational studies are an essential part of this exploration. With the rise of synthetic biology, evolutionary robotics, artificial life and advanced simulations, novel perspectives to these problems have led to a rather interesting scenario, where not only the major transitions can be studied or even reproduced, but even new ones might be potentially identified. In both cases, transitions can be understood in terms of phase transitions, as defined in physics. Such mapping (if correct) would help in defining a general framework to establish a theory of major transitions, both natural and artificial. Here, we review some advances made at the crossroads between statistical physics, artificial life, synthetic biology and evolutionary robotics.This article is part of the themed issue 'The major synthetic evolutionary transitions'.

Finite population analysis of the effect of horizontal gene transfer on the origin of an universal and optimal genetic code

The origin of a universal and optimal genetic code remains a compelling mystery in molecular biology and marks an essential step in the origin of DNA and protein based life. We examine a collective evolution model of genetic code origin that allows for unconstrained horizontal transfer of genetic elements within a finite population of sequences each of which is associated with a genetic code selected from a pool of primordial codes. We find that when horizontal transfer of genetic elements is incorporated in this more realistic model of code-sequence coevolution in a finite population, it can increase the likelihood of emergence of a more optimal code eventually leading to its universality through fixation in the population. The establishment of such an optimal code depends on the probability of HGT events. Only when the probability of HGT events is above a critical threshold, we find that the ten amino acid code having a structure that is most consistent with the standard genetic code (SGC) often gets fixed in the population with the highest probability. We examine how the threshold is determined by factors like the population size, length of the sequences and selection coefficient. Our simulation results reveal the conditions under which sharing of coding innovations through horizontal transfer of genetic elements may have facilitated the emergence of a universal code having a structure similar to that of the SGC.

The generation of meaningful information in molecular systems.

The physico-chemical processes occurring inside cells are under the computational control of genetic (DNA) and epigenetic (internal structural) programming. The origin and evolution of genetic information (nucleic acid sequences) is reasonably well understood, but scant attention has been paid to the origin and evolution of the molecular biological interpreters that give phenotypic meaning to the sequence information that is quite faithfully replicated during cellular reproduction. The near universality and age of the mapping from nucleotide triplets to amino acids embedded in the functionality of the protein synthetic machinery speaks to the early development of a system of coding which is still extant in every living organism. We take the origin of genetic coding as a paradigm of the emergence of computation in natural systems, focusing on the requirement that the molecular components of an interpreter be synthesized autocatalytically. Within this context, it is seen that interpreters of increasing complexity are generated by series of transitions through stepped dynamic instabilities (non-equilibrium phase transitions). The early phylogeny of the amino acyl-tRNA synthetase enzymes is discussed in such terms, leading to the conclusion that the observed optimality of the genetic code is a natural outcome of the processes of self-organization that produced it.