Organised Inpatient Stroke Unit Care Research Articles

Effectiveness of special stroke units in treatment of acute stroke

In Germany the implementation of specialized wards for the care of stroke patients is proposed. However, which type of organized inpatient stroke unit care is most effective and which group of patients will benefit most remains unclear. Based on the analyses of the Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration this paper reports results of randomized and quasi-randomized trials that compared organized inpatient (stroke unit) care with contemporary conventional care. The primary analyses examined death, dependency and institutionalization. Secondary outcome measures included patient quality of life, patient and carer satisfaction and length of stay in hospital and/or institution. The analysis of twenty trails with 3864 patients showed a reduction in the rate of deaths in the stroke unit group as compared with the control group (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97). The odds of death or institutionalized care were lower (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.90) as were death or dependency (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.87). The results were independent of patient age, sex, stroke severity, and type of stroke unit organization. Organized care in stroke units resulted in benefits for stroke patients with regard to survival, independence, and probability of living at home. However, these results refer exclusively to Anglo-American and Scandinavian trials. German stroke unit services are organized in a different way. No data about the effectiveness of the German model is yet available.

How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration.

We sought to clarify the way in which organized inpatient (stroke unit) care can produce reductions in case fatality and in the need for institutional care after stroke. We performed a secondary analysis of a collaborative systematic review of all randomized trials that compared organized inpatient (stroke unit) care with contemporary conventional care. Nineteen trials were included, of which 18 (3246 patients) could provide outcome data on death, place of residence, and final functional outcome. Data were less complete (but always available for at least 12 trials; 1611 patients) for subgroup analyses examining timing and cause of death and outcomes in patients with different levels of severity of initial stroke. The reduction in case fatality of patients managed in a stroke unit setting developed between 1 and 4 weeks after the index stroke. The reduction in the odds of death was evident across all causes of death and most marked for those deaths considered to be secondary to immobility. However, data were insufficient to permit a firm conclusion. The relative increase in the number of patients discharged home from stroke units as opposed to conventional care was largely attributable to an increase in the number of patients returning home physically independent. Across the range of stroke severity, stroke unit care was associated with nonsignificant increases in the number of patients regaining independence. Within the limitations of the available data, we conclude that organized inpatient stroke unit care probably benefits a wide range of stroke patients in a variety of different ways, ie, reducing death from secondary complications of stroke and reducing the need for institutional care through a reduction in disability.