Organized Mammography Screening Research Articles

Validity of self-reported number of pregnancies and maternal age at first birth among females attending organized mammographic screening.

Reproductive history conveys information about potential health risks later in adulthood. This study aimed to examine the validity of self-reported number of pregnancies and maternal age at first birth (AFB) among females attending BreastScreen Norway. Participants were identified through the Janus Serum Bank cohort in Norway and were eligible for this cross-sectional validation study if they participated in a health survey issued by BreastScreen Norway between 2006 and 2015. Retrospective self-reported survey information on number of pregnancies and AFB in years was validated against prospectively collected information from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) using the Spearman rank (rs) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). After exclusions, 51,598 subjects were included in the analysis on number of pregnancies and 46,919 in the analysis on AFB. On average, study subjects were 59-60 years old when completing the health survey and had become first-time mothers roughly 36 years earlier. Survey-based information about number of pregnancies was highly correlated and demonstrated high agreement with the registry data (rs=0.967, 95% CI 0.964-0.969; ICC=0.884, 95% CI 0.882-0.885). Survey-based information about AFB demonstrated even higher correlation and very high agreement with the registry data (rs=0.975, 95% CI 0.973-0.976; ICC=0.974, 95% CI 0.974-0.975). Retrospectively recalled survey-based information about number of pregnancies and AFB was highly accurate when validated against prospectively collected information in the MBRN. These survey-based data are valuable for future epidemiological research, and linkage to the MBRN may not be required when these data are available.

Linguistic difference in the effect of organized programs on socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening: ecological study in Switzerland.

The objective of this study is to examine how the effect of organized mammography screening programs on breast cancer screening participation differ between socioeconomic strata and how this relationship may be modified by the context of linguistic differences. Switzerland, marked by its diverse linguistic landscape, reflects cultural variations alongside differences in public health strategies. The goal of this study was to assess potential socioeconomic differences in regional mammography screening programs effectiveness to improve breast cancer screening participation. Data on 14 173 women in the regionally adapted breast cancer screening age range was drawn from five cross-sectional waves of the nationally representative Swiss Health Interview Survey (1997-2017). Socioeconomic indicators included education, household income, and employment status. Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios of up-to-date (last 2 years) mammography uptake. Inequality was assessed using relative index of inequality and the slope index of inequality. Organized screening programs were generally effective and increased up-to-date mammography uptake by close to 20 percentage points in both regions. While in the Latin cantons, screening programs had no impact on socioeconomic inequalities in screening, it reduced inequalities for women with lower education in the German cantons. This modification effect of screening programs was not seen for income and employment-related inequalities and did not differ across linguistic regions. Public health agencies should consider the different cultural reception of programs as addressing these differences could help ensure that breast cancer screening initiatives are not only effective, but also culturally equitable across different socioeconomic groups.

Abstract PO5-07-12: Feasibility of organized population-based mass-level mammography screening (0.2 million women) –Report from LMIC-Uzbekistan

Abstract Background. Breast cancer is one of the leading diseases worldwide. The early detection of breast cancer is the best way to improve survival. Mammography is included in the standard guidelines of all the leading organizations. The procedure is technically demanding and cost sensitive. Despite being a standard, it is not practical in many countries, and more so in LMIC. The state of Uzbekistan embarked on a massive, unique, organized population-based program of mass-level mammography screening, starting from one region of the country and expanding to others. Here, we report the process of such establishment and the feasibility of this innovative model. Methods. Realizing the importance of breast cancer screening, the Republic of Uzbekistan initiated a pilot project in the Bukhara Region. The area is divided into 12 districts. Every district was equipped with a stationary mammography machine in a regional polyclinic and one mobile van. The personnel were appropriately trained and a selection process was established to invite women for screening. The invitation was sent using the local area's existing municipality residential directory, which contains the complete demographic details of every individual living in the area. The state has 100 % coverage in the registry. The study targeted every woman aged 45-65 starting May 2021. All mammographs were digitally recorded and sent in real time to a centralized server at the National Republican Cancer Center in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Reporting is performed at a centralized reading center on the information system platform. The program envisages a complete care pathway, from screening to diagnosis and treatment. Results. Over a period of two years, 140506 women in the age range–45-65 underwent mammography screening. Depending on the size of the target group of the district, an average of 30-60 mammograms were performed per day. A reported preliminary analysis shows the presence of BIRADS 0 in 4495, BIRADS 1 IN 78634, BIRADS 2 in 64345, BIRADS 4 in 4998, BIRADS 5 in 893. All women with BIRADS 4 and 5 were referred to the regional comprehensive cancer center for further evaluation. A total of 7570 patients underwent cytology and 408 underwent core biopsy. Depending on the reports, the patients were appropriately managed. A total of 1885 patients were recalled for additional screening owing to their inappropriate quality. After a year of function, the project was expanded with “Mobile Vans” to other regions of the country. An additional 13 mobile mammography vans were added after 1.5 years. From January 2023, approximately 50000 mammograms were additionally performed, taking the total number of screened women to 190506. Conclusion. Thus, it is feasible to plan and successfully implement state-owned mass-level mammography screenings. This project has the potential for duplication in any part of the world, and other organizations can learn from this extensive, wide program. Citation Format: Mirzagaleb Tillyashaykhov, Aysulu Seytmuratova, Alexander Ososkov, Saide Djanklich, Yakhyo Ziyaev, Dinesh Pendharlkar. Feasibility of organized population-based mass-level mammography screening (0.2 million women) –Report from LMIC-Uzbekistan [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-07-12.

Incidence-Based Breast Cancer Mortality Trends in Estonia Before and After the Introduction of Organized Mammography Screening: A Register-Based Study.

Despite the relatively low breast cancer incidence in Estonia, mortality remains high, and participation in mammography screening is below the recommended 70%. The objective of this register-based study was to evaluate incidence-based (IB) breast cancer mortality before and after the introduction of organized mammography screening in 2004. Breast cancer deaths individually linked to breast cancer diagnosis were obtained from the Estonian Cancer Registry and used for calculating IB mortality. We compared age-specific IB mortality rates across 5-year birth cohorts and 5-year periods. Poisson regression was used to compare IB mortality for one age group invited to screening (50-63) and three age groups not invited to screening (30-49, 65-69, and 70+) during two periods before and after screening initiation (1993-2003 and 2004-2014). Joinpoint regression was used for age-standardized incidence and IB mortality trends. Age-standardized IB mortality has been decreasing since 1997. Age-specific IB mortality for birth cohorts never exposed to screening showed a continuous increase with age, while in cohorts exposed to organized screening the mortality curve flattened or declined after the age of first invitation. Significant decreases in mortality from 1993-2003 to 2004-2014 were seen in the 30-49 (age-adjusted rate ratio 0.51, 95% CI 90.42-0.63) and 50-63 (0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.74) age groups, while no decline was seen in the 65-69 and 70+ age groups. The age specific IB mortality curves in birth cohorts exposed to screening and the significant mortality decline in the target age group after the initiation of the organized program suggest a beneficial effect of screening. Improved treatment without screening has not reduced mortality in older age groups. Our results support raising the upper screening age limit to 74 years.

Differences in mammography screening attendance among non-Western immigrants in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway

Several studies have shown that attendance rates are lower among non-Western immigrants than among natives. As the Nordic countries have quite similar health systems and populations but also differences in the organisation of their organised mammography screening programmes, differences in attendance rates could highlight organisational factors that might increase the attendance rates. Mammography screening is offered free of charge in Denmark and Finland, but not in Iceland and Norway. Contrarily to the other countries, Iceland do not send out pre-booked appointment.The study population included natives and non-Western immigrants aged 50–69 years, who had at least one invitation to the national mammography screening programmes in Denmark (2008–2017), Finland (2001–2017), Iceland (2001–2020) or Norway (2001–2015). Relative risks (RRs) of attendance were estimated and adjusted for age group and calendar period.The study population included 116.033 non-Western immigrants and more than 2 million natives. The attendance rates were significantly lower among non-Western immigrants than among natives, with an adjusted relative risk of 0.81/0.80 in Denmark and Finland, 0.62 in Norway, and 0.40 in Iceland. The lower attendance rates among immigrants in Norway and Iceland did not seem to be due to differences in birth country, immigration age, or educational level, but might be explained by organisational factors.Offering free-of-charge mammography screening in Norway and Iceland and/or including a pre-booked appointment in the invitation letters in Iceland might increase the attendance rate among non-Western immigrants.

History of Mammography: Analysis of Breast Imaging Diagnostic Achievements over the Last Century.

Breast cancer is the most common forms of cancer and a leading cause of mortality in women. Early and correct diagnosis is, therefore, essential to save lives. The development of diagnostic imaging applied to the breast has been impressive in recent years and the most used diagnostic test in the world is mammography, a low-dose X-ray technique used for imaging the breast. In the first half of the 20th century, the diagnosis was in practice only clinical, with consequent diagnostic delay and an unfavorable prognosis in the short term. The rise of organized mammography screening has led to a remarkable reduction in mortality through the early detection of breast malignancies. This historical review aims to offer a complete panorama of the development of mammography and breast imaging during the last century. Through this study, we want to understand the foundations of the pillar of radiology applied to the breast through to the most modern applications such as contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), artificial intelligence, and radiomics. Understanding the history of the development of diagnostic imaging applied to the breast can help us understand how to better direct our efforts toward an increasingly personalized and effective diagnostic approach. The ultimate goal of imaging applied to the detection of breast malignancies should be to reduce mortality from this type of disease as much as possible. With this paper, we want to provide detailed documentation of the main steps in the evolution of breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast neoplasms; we also want to open up new scenarios where the possible current and future applications of imaging are aimed at being more precise and personalized.

Breast cancer screening in young women

Breast cancer is the main cause of cancer death in women under the age of 40. However, the organized mammographic screening of a young healthy woman was recognized by most experts as ineffective. This article is a brief overview about understanding of the risks of developing breast cancer in young women and a possible personalized screening in this group of patients.

The offer of organized mammography screening from 45 to 74 years of age and open issues in the age group 45-54 years

The new EU Council Recommendation on cancer screening extends organized mammography screening to the 45-74-year age group. Mammography screening in young women has been the subject of discussion since its inception almost forty years ago. Starting from the recent publication of the survival data for breast cancer of the regional programme for women aged 45-49 years, activated in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Northern Italy), it is here proposed to test, with a research and innovation practice, a new screening offer for the 45-54-year age group with a tailored approach, i.e., based on the risk level and breast density.

"It Will Lead You to Make Better Decisions about Your Health"-A Focus Group and Survey Study on Women's Attitudes towards Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening and Personalised Risk Assessments.

Singapore launched a population-based organised mammography screening (MAM) programme in 2002. However, uptake is low. A better understanding of breast cancer (BC) risk factors has generated interest in shifting from a one-size-fits-all to a risk-based screening approach. However, public acceptability of the change is lacking. Focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted with 54 women (median age 37.5 years) with no BC history. Eight online sessions were transcribed, coded, and thematically analysed. Additionally, we surveyed 993 participants in a risk-based MAM study on how they felt in anticipation of receiving their risk profiles. Attitudes towards MAM (e.g., fear, low perceived risk) have remained unchanged for ~25 years. However, FGD participants reported that they would be more likely to attend routine mammography after having their BC risks assessed, despite uncertainty and concerns about risk-based screening. This insight was reinforced by the survey participants reporting more positive than negative feelings before receiving their risk reports. There is enthusiasm in knowing personal disease risk but concerns about the level of support for individuals learning they are at higher risk for breast cancer. Our results support the empowering of Singaporean women with personal health information to improve MAM uptake.

Coverage rate of opportunistic and organised breast cancer screening in France: Department-level estimation

ObjectiveIn France, the national breast cancer screening programme (NBCSP), targeting women aged 50–74 years was rolled out nationwide in 2004. It aims at reducing breast cancer mortality. In addition to the NBCSP, the use of opportunistic screening is permitted in France. The objective of this study is to estimate both opportunistic use and overall coverage rates of breast cancer screening, among women 40–84 years of age, in France. MethodsThe French medico-administrative health data system (SNDS) was used to identify women performing an opportunistic or organised mammography screening in France in 2016–2017. ResultsThe two-yearly opportunistic mammography screening is 18 % among women aged 40–84; it is 11 % among women aged 50–74, i.e., the target age range for organised screening, 36 % among women aged 40–49 and 13 % among women aged 75–84. The overall two-yearly screening coverage is 48 % for all women aged 40–84; it is 60 % among women aged 50–74, 36 % among women 40–49 and 16 % for those aged 75–84. Geographical variations in screening are lessened when the two screening strategies are considered, as they balance each other. ConclusionAlthough coverage in the NBCSP is around 50 % in France, more than one third of the women make use of opportunistic screening within and outside the target age range. Organized screening appears to improve equity of access to mammography screening service. The lack of data on opportunistic screening practices hinders the evaluation of French screening practices as a whole.

Effectiveness of Organized Mammography Screening for Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes.

Simple SummaryWe evaluated the short-term effectiveness of a mammography screening program in all women who participated in the screening program and were diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer (BC) in Flanders (2008–2018). The evaluation was performed for the major molecular subtypes of invasive BC separately and considering the regularity of participation. We found that screen-detected BC was more likely to be diagnosed at early stages than interval BC of luminal, luminal-HER2-positive, and triple-negative BC (TNBC) type, but not for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2 positive) subtype. In addition, regular participation was related to a higher likelihood of screening detection than irregular participation for luminal, luminal-HER2-positive, and TNBC, but not for the HER2 positive subtype, either. Our results indicate that regular screening as compared to irregular screening is effective for all breast cancers except for the HER2 subtype.Background: Screening program effectiveness is generally evaluated for breast cancer (BC) as one disease and without considering the regularity of participation, while this might have an impact on detection rate. Objectives: To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of a mammography screening program for the major molecular subtypes of invasive BC. Methods: All women who participated in the screening program and were diagnosed with screen-detected or interval BC in Flanders were included in the study (2008–2018). Molecular subtypes considered were luminal and luminal-HER2-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and triple-negative BC (TNBC). The relationship between the BC stage at diagnosis (early (I–II) versus advanced (III–IV)) and the method of detection (screen-detected or interval) and the relationship between the method of detection and participation regularity (regular versus irregular) were evaluated by multi-variable logistic regression models. All models were performed for each molecular subtype and adjusted for age. Results: Among the 12,318 included women, BC of luminal and luminal-HER2-positive subtypes accounted for 70.9% and 11.3%, respectively. Screen-detected BC was more likely to be diagnosed at early stages than interval BC with varied effect sizes for luminal, luminal-HER2-positive, and TNBC with OR:2.82 (95% CI: 2.45–3.25), OR:2.39 (95% CI: 1.77–3.24), and OR:2.29 (95% CI: 1.34–4.05), respectively. Regular participation was related to a higher likelihood of screening detection than irregular participation for luminal, luminal-HER2-positive, and TNBC with OR:1.21 (95% CI: 1.09–1.34), OR: 1.79 (95% CI: 1.38–2.33), and OR: 1.62 (95% CI: 1.10–2.41), respectively. Conclusions: Regular screening as compared to irregular screening is effective for all breast cancers except for the HER2 subtype.

Quality of life among women with symptomatic, screen-detected, and interval breast cancer, and for women without breast cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional study from Norway

PurposeBreast cancers detected at screening need less aggressive treatment compared to breast cancers detected due to symptoms. The evidence on the quality of life associated with screen-detected versus symptomatic breast cancer is sparse. This study aimed to compare quality of life among Norwegian women with symptomatic, screen-detected and interval breast cancer, and women without breast cancer and investigate quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for women with breast cancer from the third to 14th year since diagnosis.MethodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study was focused on women aged 50 and older. A self-reported questionnaire including EQ-5D-5L was sent to 11,500 women. Multivariable median regression was used to analyze the association between quality of life score (visual analogue scale 0–100) and detection mode. Health utility values representing women’s health status were extracted from EQ-5D-5L. QALYs were estimated by summing up the health utility values for women stratified by detection mode for each year between the third and the 14th year since breast cancer diagnosis, assuming that all women would survive.ResultsAdjusted regression analyses showed that women with screen-detected (n = 1206), interval cancer (n = 1005) and those without breast cancer (n = 1255) reported a higher median quality of life score using women with symptomatic cancer (n = 1021) as reference; 3.7 (95%CI 2.2–5.2), 2.3 (95%CI 0.7–3.8) and 4.8 (95%CI 3.3–6.4), respectively. Women with symptomatic, screen-detected and interval cancer would experience 9.5, 9.6 and 9.5 QALYs, respectively, between the third and the 14th year since diagnosis.ConclusionWomen with screen-detected or interval breast cancer reported better quality of life compared to women with symptomatic cancer. The findings add benefits of organized mammographic screening.

Does it matter for the radiologists\u2019 performance whether they read short or long batches in organized mammographic screening?

ObjectiveTo analyze the association between radiologists’ performance and image position within a batch in screen reading of mammograms in Norway.MethodWe described true and false positives and true and false negatives by groups of image positions and batch sizes for 2,937,312 screen readings performed from 2012 to 2018. Mixed-effects models were used to obtain adjusted proportions of true and false positive, true and false negative, sensitivity, and specificity for different image positions. We adjusted for time of day and weekday and included the individual variation between the radiologists as random effects. Time spent reading was included in an additional model to explore a possible mediation effect.ResultTrue and false positives were negatively associated with image position within the batch, while the rates of true and false negatives were positively associated. In the adjusted analyses, the rate of true positives was 4.0 per 1000 (95% CI: 3.8–4.2) readings for image position 10 and 3.9 (95% CI: 3.7–4.1) for image position 60. The rate of true negatives was 94.4% (95% CI: 94.0–94.8) for image position 10 and 94.8% (95% CI: 94.4–95.2) for image position 60. Per 1000 readings, the rate of false negative was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.53–0.67) for image position 10 and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55–0.69) for image position 60.ConclusionThere was a decrease in the radiologists’ sensitivity throughout the batch, and although this effect was small, our results may be clinically relevant at a population level or when multiplying the differences with the number of screen readings for the individual radiologists.Key Points• True and false positive reading scores were negatively associated with image position within a batch.• A decreasing trend of positive scores indicated a beneficial effect of a certain number of screen readings within a batch.• False negative scores increased throughout the batch but the association was not statistically significant.

Screening is associated with lower mastectomy rates in eastern Switzerland beyond stage effects

BackgroundA recent study found an influence of organized mammography screening programmes (MSPs) on geographical and temporal variation of mastectomy rates. We aimed to quantify the effect on the example of one of the cantonal programmes in Switzerland.MethodsWe used incidence data for the years 2010–2017 from the cancer registry of Eastern Switzerland. We included women with invasive-non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) in the screening age group 50–69-year-olds in the canton of St.Gallen. We compared mastectomy rates among cancer patients detected through the organised screening programme (MSP) vs. otherwise detected by stage.ResultsMSP-detected patients in St.Gallen presented with lower stages. 95% of MSP-detected had stages I-II vs 76% of Non-MSP-detected. Within all non-metastatic stage, tumour size and nodal status groups, MSP-detected patients had lower mastectomy rates, overall 10% vs 24% in 50–69-year-old non-participants. Their odds of receiving a mastectomy are about half of the Non-MSP-detected (OR = 0.48, p = 0.002).ConclusionsOur study showed that MSPs have a positive effect on lowering mastectomy rates. Screening participants are significantly less likely to receive a mastectomy compared to non-participants, which must be attributed to additional factors than just lower stages. Lower mastectomy rates lead to a higher quality of life for many patients.

Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model

BackgroundMammography screening is the main method for early detection of breast cancer in Norway. Few studies have focused on psychological determinants of both attendance and non-attendance of publicly available mammography screening programs. The aim of the current study, guided by the Extended Parallel Process Model, was to examine how psychological factors influence defensive avoidance of breast cancer screening and intention to attend mammography.MethodsCross-sectional survey data from a community sample of women living in Norway aged ≥ 18 (N = 270), and without a history of breast cancer, was collected from September 2018 to June 2019 and used to investigate the relationships between the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) constructs and two outcomes: defensive avoidance of breast cancer screening and intention to attend mammography within the next two years. After adjusting for confounding factors, the hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses was conducted to assess the ability of the independent variables based on the EPPM to predict the two outcome variables. Significance level was chosen at p < 0.05.ResultsMultivariate analyses showed that defensive avoidance of breast cancer screening was predicted by lower perceived susceptibility to breast cancer (β = − 0.22, p = 0.001), lower response efficacy of mammography screening (β = − 0.33, p = 0.001), higher breast cancer fear (β = 0.15, p = 0.014), and checking breasts for lumps (β = − 0.23, p = 0.001). Intention to attend mammography within the next two years was predicted by higher response efficacy of mammography screening (β = 0.13, p = 0.032), having a lower educational level (β = − 0.10, p = 0.041), and regular previous mammography attendance compared to never attending (β = 0.49, p = 0.001).ConclusionsThe study revealed that defensive avoidance of breast cancer screening and intention to attend mammography were not predicted by the same pattern of psychological factors. Our findings suggest future health promotion campaigns need to focus not only on the psychological factors that encourage women’s decision to attend the screening, but also to counter factors that contribute to women’s decision to avoid it.

In situ breast cancer\xa0incidence patterns in Iceland and differences in ductal carcinoma in situ treatment compared to Sweden

The purpose was to review the incidence of in situ carcinoma in Iceland after initiating population-based mammography screening in 1987 and to compare management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between Iceland and the Uppsala–Örebro region (UÖR) in Central Sweden. The Icelandic Cancer Registry provided data on in situ breast carcinomas for women between 1957 and 2017. Clinical data for women with DCIS between 2008 and 2014 was extracted from hospital records and compared to women diagnosed in UÖR. In Iceland, in situ carcinoma incidence increased from 7 to 30 per 100 000 women per year, following the introduction of organised mammography screening. The proportion of in situ carcinoma of all breast carcinomas increased from 4 to 12%. More than one third (35%) of women diagnosed with DCIS in Iceland were older than 70 years versus 18% in UÖR. In Iceland, 49% of all DCIS women underwent mastectomy compared to 40% in UÖR. The incidence of in situ carcinoma in Iceland increased four-fold after the uptake of population-based mammography screening causing considerable risk of overtreatment. Differences in treatment of DCIS were seen between Iceland and UÖR, revealing the importance of quality registration for monitoring patterns of management.

532 Poster - Effects of organised mammography screening on breast cancer care in specialist breast units in Aachen, Germany since 2008

532 Poster - Effects of organised mammography screening on breast cancer care in specialist breast units in Aachen, Germany since 2008

Incidence of interval breast cancer among women aged 45-49 in an organised mammography screening setting.

To estimate the proportional incidence (PI) of first- and second-year interval breast cancer among women aged 45-49. In the Emilia-Romagna Region (northern Italy), women aged 45-49 are invited to mammography screening annually, and women aged 50-74 biennially. For younger ones, the proportional incidence of interval cancer in the first and unique interval year was calculated using standard methods. For the second, hypothetical year, it was estimated using two different estimates of the ratio between the second- and the first-year proportional incidence observed among women aged 50-54. Overall, 567,151 negative mammography records were used. In the first interval year, the observed proportional incidence of interval cancer among women aged 45-49 was 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-0.33), within the European limit considered desirable for women aged 50-69 (<0.30). In the second, hypothetical interval year, the estimated proportional incidence ranged from 0.61 (95% CI, 0.43-0.86) to 0.48 (95% CI, 0.31-0.76) depending on whether the estimate was based on data from the pre-digital or digital era, respectively. The more up-to-date estimate of 0.48, slightly below the maximum limit considered acceptable for women aged 50-69 (<0.50), suggests that a screening interval of two years may also be an acceptable option for women aged 45-49.

Breast cancer survivors' risk of interval cancers and false positive results in organized mammography screening.

BackgroundBreast cancer survivors are increasing followed for new breast cancers / recurrences by mammography screening only. We aimed at assessing how often breast cancer survivors get a false positive or false negative result at mammography screening.MethodsAll mammography screenings performed between 2007 and 2017 in the Danish national mammography screening programme were included. Screenings in women with a breast cancer diagnosis prior to invitation were included in the “breast cancer survivors” group, while remaining screenings were included in the “no previous breast cancer” group. We compared the proportion of false positive screenings and the proportion of breast cancers detected at screening among breast cancer survivors and women without previous breast cancer. The analyses were further stratified according to whether the women had a diagnostic breast imaging in the 21 months prior to the screening.ResultsAt initial screenings, breast cancer survivors had a significant lower false positive risk than other women, while the risk was similar at subsequent screenings. Breast cancer survivors had a significant lower proportion of breast cancers detected at screening compared to other women. This was true both for women who had a diagnostic breast imaging in the 21 months prior to screening and those who did not.ConclusionThis study shows that breast cancers survivors have a smaller amount of their new breast cancers detected at mammography screening, when compare to the amount of new breast cancers detected at mammography screening among women without previous breast cancer. The lower sensitivity does not seem to be due to different behavior among breast cancer survivors.

Economic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Early Detection Strategies in Asia: A Systematic Review

ObjectiveThis article aims to support the development of practical guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Asia by systematically reviewing economic evaluation studies of such early detection strategies in Asian countries. MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols checklist. The quality of reviewed studies was examined using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. ResultsA total of 15 articles on the economic evaluation of breast cancer early detection based in Asia were reviewed. Cost-effectiveness was used in all the studies as the analytic method to compare the cost and consequences of different screening policies. Ten studies were categorized as incorporating the modeled approach. Fourteen studies analysed the cost-effectiveness of the organized population-based approach, in which mammography screening was the prevailing screening modality. Only one study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of early diagnosis for breast cancer patients in order to provide early treatment. The results from the identified economic evaluations, and consequent recommendations concerning optimal early detection strategies varied among studies, and depended on key parameters and assumption used, as well as differences in inter-country health resources, breast cancer incidence, prevalence and early detection pathways. ConclusionsThe economic evaluation of breast cancer early detection programs is still limited in Asia. Policy decisions on organized mammography screening in women <50 are economically attractive in the region, despite the lack of evidence to provide recommendations on opportunistic screening strategy and early diagnosis strategy. Future studies need to provide better transparency of the data used and cover more comprehensive strategies, to make them relevant and adaptable to other Asian countries, resulting in clear policy recommendations on breast cancer early detection strategies.