Organ Procurement Organization Performance Research Articles

Adjusting for race in metrics of organ procurement organization performance

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients has previously reported the effects of adjusting for demographic variables, including race, in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) organ procurement organization (OPO) performance metrics: donation rate and transplant rate. CMS chose not to adjust for most demographic variables other than age (for the transplant rate), arguing that there is no biological reason that these variables would affect the organ donation/utilization decision. However, organ donation is a process based on altruism and trust, not a simple biological phenomenon. Focusing only on biological impacts on health ignores other pathways through which demographic factors can influence OPO outcomes. In this study, we update analyses of demographic adjustment on the OPO metrics for 2020 with a specific focus on adjusting for race. We find that adjusting for race would lead to 8 OPOs changing their CMS tier rankings, including 2 OPOs that actually overperform the national rate among non-White donors improving from a tier 3 ranking (facing decertification without possibility of recompeting) to a tier 2 ranking (allowing the possibility of recompeting). Incorporation of stratified and risk-adjusted metrics in public reporting of OPO performance could help OPOs identify areas for improvement within specific demographic categories.

Developing online communication training to request donation for vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA): improving performance to match new US organ donation targets.

Approaching families of dying or newly deceased patients to donate organs requires specialized knowledge and a mastery of relational communication. As the transplantation field has progressed, Donation Professionals (DPs) are also leading conversations with family decision makers (FDMs) about the donation of uncommon anatomical gifts, such as face, hands, genitalia, referred to as Vascularized Composite Allotransplants (VCA) without much training or experience. To address the need for training, we adapted and beta tested an evidenced-based communication training program for donation discussions to VCA requests. The overarching goal of Communicating Effectively about Donation for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (CEaD-VCA) is to increase the number of VCA authorizations and to improve the socioemotional outcomes of FDMs. We developed CEaD-VCA, an online, on-demand training program based on the previously tested, evidenced-based communication skills training program designed to train DPs to have conversations about solid organ donation. The training was modified utilizing data from a national telephone survey with DPs and results of 6 focus groups conducted with members of the general public. The survey and focus groups assessed knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to VCA donation. The training was shaped by a partnership with a leading industry partner, the Gift of Life Institute.™ RESULTS: Using the results as a guide, the existing CEaD training program, consisting of interactive eLearning modules, was adapted to include technical information about VCA, foundational communication skills, and two interactive example VCA donation request scenarios to facilitate active learning. Forty-two DPs from two partner Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) participated in the beta test of CEaD-VCA. Pre- and post-test surveys assessed the impact of the training. The training was scored highly by DPs in effectiveness and ease of use. This project created a standardized, accessible, and comprehensive training for DPs to communicate about VCA donation. CEaD-VCA is an example of how to develop a communication skills training for difficult conversations utilizing input from stakeholders, guided by communication theory. It also demonstrates how gaps in communication skills during medical education can be filled utilizing advanced online Learning Management Systems. The training specifically addresses new CMS rules concerning OPO performance metrics.

Population Characteristics and Organ Procurement Organization Performance Metrics

In 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule updating the Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) Conditions for Coverage. This rule evaluates OPO performance based on an unadjusted donation rate and an age-adjusted transplant rate; however, neither considers other underlying population differences. To evaluate whether adjusting for age and/or area deprivation index yields the same tier assignments as the cause, age, and location consistent (CALC) tier used by CMS. This retrospective cross-sectional study examined the performance of 58 OPOs from 2018 to 2020 across the entire US. A total of 12 041 778 death records were examined from the 2017 to 2020 National Center for Health Statistics' Restricted Vital Statistics Detailed Multiple Cause of Death files; 399 530 of these met the definition of potential deceased donor. Information about 42 572 solid organ donors from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was also used. Statistical analysis was performed from January 2017 to December 2020. Area deprivation of donation service areas and age of potential donors. OPO performance as measured by donation and transplant rates. A total of 399 530 potential deceased donors and 42 572 actual solid donor organs were assigned to 1 of 58 OPOs. Age and ADI adjustment resulted in 19.0% (11 of 58) to 31.0% (18 of 58) reclassification of tier ratings for the OPOs, with 46.6% of OPOs (27 of 58) changing tier ranking at least once during the 3-year period. Between 6.9% (4 of 58) and 12.1% (7 of 58) moved into tier 1 and up to 8.6% (5 of 58) moved into tier 3. This cross-sectional study of population characteristics and OPO performance metrics found that adjusting for area deprivation and age significantly changed OPO measured performance and tier classifications. These findings suggest that underlying population characteristics may alter processes of care and characterize donation and transplant rates independent of OPO performance. Risk adjustment accounting for population characteristics warrants consideration in prospective policy and further evaluation of quality metrics.

What is visible is fixable: Visual dashboards for multi-domain assessment of organ procurement organization performance

With stakeholder focus on the United States organ procurement system, there is a need for tools that permit comparative assessment of organ procurement providers. We developed a public-facing dashboard for organ procurement organizations (OPOs), using data from multiple sources, to create an online, readily accessible visualization of OPO practice conditions and performance for the period 2010-2020. With this tool, OPOs can be compared on the CMS metric of donors procured per 100 donation-consistent deaths, as well as donation after circulatory death procurement, procurement of older and minority patient populations, procurement in smaller hospitals, and procurement of patients without a significant drug history. Patterns of higher performance were identified, and 74% of differences in overall donor procurement rates could be explained using model variables. Procurement differences were affected to a greater and more reproducible degree by OPO performance among Black and non-White patient populations, as well as in smaller hospitals, than by donation service area characteristics. Dashboards such as ours support OPOs and stakeholders in quality improvement actions, through leveraging benchmarked performance data among organ procurement clinical providers.

Variability in Heart Yield From Donation After Brain Death Between Organ Procurement Organizations: An Opportunity for Improvement.

Increasing the number of available hearts for transplantation is the best strategy to decrease waitlist mortality. This study examines organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and their role in the transplantation network to determine whether variability in performance exists across them. Adult deceased donors who met the criteria for brain death between 2010 and 2020 (inclusive) in the United States were examined. A regression model was fitted and internally validated using donor characteristics available at the time of organ recovery to predict the likelihood of heart transplantation. Subsequently, an expected heart yield was calculated for each donor using this model. Observed-to-expected (O/E) heart yield ratios for each OPO were calculated by dividing the number of hearts recovered for transplantation by the expected number of recoveries. There were 58 OPOs active during the study period, and on average, OPO activity grew over time. The mean O/E ratio among OPOs was 0.98 (standard deviation ± 0.18). Twenty-one OPOs consistently performed below the expected level (95% confidence intervals < 1.0) and generated a deficit of 1,088 expected transplantations during the study period. The proportion of hearts that were recovered for transplantation varied significantly by OPO categories: low tier 31.8%, mid tier 35.6%, and high tier 36.2% (p < 0.01), even as the expected yield was similar across tiers (p = 0.69). OPO performance accounts for 28% of the variability in successfully transplanting a heart after accounting for the role of referring hospitals, donor families, and transplantation centers. In conclusion, there is significant variability in volume and heart yield from brain-dead donors across OPOs.

Trends in donation after circulatory determination of death donor utilization: Lessons from Houston

BackgroundModern advancements have made organ transplantation an increasingly viable option for patients with organ failure. The resulting increases in patients awaiting transplant has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality due to increasing waiting time for transplant. The use of Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death (DCD) organ donors has been the most successful avenue to address the increased need for organ allografts. This review provides a brief history of DCD organ donation in the United States as represented by the experience of the Houston-based LifeGift Organ Procurement Organization (OPO). MethodsOrgan donation data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and OPO specific data to include all available DCD donors for LifeGift were obtained for analysis. Trends in DCD donation were analyzed in the context of United Network for Organ Sharing policy. ResultsBy the end of 2021 20% of organs donated in the United States were from DCD donors, in a steadily increasing trend since the mid-1990′s. Metrics utilized by UNOS to monitor organ donation rates and OPO performance do not clearly capture potential DCD donors. Individual OPOs have varying success in utilization of DCD donors, with OPOs like LifeGift focusing on increased DCD utilization. ConclusionDCD utilization remains the most successful avenue for increasing the deceased donor organ pool in the United States. Increased utilization of DCD organs by transplant centers and focused efforts by OPOs to promote DCD donation can improve the organ shortage nationally. Improved clarity in UNOS metrics can further facilitate OPO performance evaluation and promote further DCD donation in the United States.

Variability in Organ Procurement Organization Performance by Individual Hospital in the United States

Availability of organs inadequately addresses the need of patients waiting for a transplant. To estimate the true number of donor patients in the United States and identify inefficiencies in the donation process as a way to guide system improvement. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed of organ donation across 13 different hospitals in 2 donor service areas covered by 2 organ procurement organizations (OPOs) in 2017 and 2018 to compare donor potential to actual donors. More than 2000 complete medical records for decedents were reviewed as a sample of nearly 9000 deaths. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Deaths of causes consistent with donation according to medical record review, ventilated patient referrals, center acceptance practices, and actual deceased donors. Potential donors by medical record review vs actual donors and OPO performance at specific hospitals. Compared with 242 actual donors, 931 potential donors were identified at these hospitals. This suggests a deceased donor potential of 3.85 times (95% CI, 4.23-5.32) the actual number of donors recovered. There was a surprisingly wide variability in conversion of potential donor patients into actual donors among the hospitals studied, from 0% to 51.0%. One OPO recovered 18.8% of the potential donors, whereas the second recovered 48.2%. The performance of the OPOs was moderately related to referrals of ventilated patients and not related to center acceptance practices. In this cross-sectional study of hospitals served by 2 OPOs, wide variation was found in the performance of the OPOs, especially at individual hospitals. Addressing this opportunity could greatly increase the organ supply, affirming the importance of recent efforts from the federal government to increase OPO accountability and transparency.

The impact of donor consent mechanism on organ procurement organization performance in the United States

Lack of donor organ availability represents a major limitation to the success of solid organ transplantation. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) publishes performance reports of organ procurement organizations (OPO) in the United States, but does not stratify by the mechanism of donor consent, namely first-person authorization (organ donor registry) and next-of-kin authorization. This study aimed to report the trends in deceased organ donation in the United States and assess the regional differences in OPO performance after accounting for the different mechanisms of donor consent. The SRTR database was queried for all eligible deaths (2008-2019) which were then stratified based on the mechanism of donor authorization. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the probability of organ donation across OPOs based on specific donor consent mechanisms. Eligible deaths were divided into 3 cohorts based on the probability to donate. Consent rates at the OPO level were calculated for each cohort. Organ donor registration among adult eligible deaths in the U.S. increased over time (2008: 10% vs 2019: 39%, p < 0.001), coincident with a decline in next-of-kin authorization rates (2008: 70% vs 2019: 64%, p < 0.001). At the OPO level, the increased organ donor registration was associated with lower next-of-kin authorization rates. Among eligible deaths with medium- and low-probability of donation, recruitment was highly variable across OPO's, ranging from 36% to 75% in the medium-probability group (median 54%, IQR 50%-59%) and 8% and 73% in the low-probability group (median 30%, IQR 17%-38%). Significant variability exists across OPOs in the consent of potentially persuadable donors after adjusting for population demographic differences and the mechanism of consent. Current metrics may not truly reflect OPO performance as they do not account for consent mechanism. There is further opportunity for improvement in deceased organ donation through targeted initiatives across OPOs, modeled after regions with the best performance.

Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance

Questions have arisen around new metrics for organ procurement organizations (OPO) due to the perception that low-performing OPOs may be limited by local centers' acceptance of marginal organs. We reviewed 2013-2019 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OTPN) and National Centers for Health Statistics (NCHS) data to explore the relationship between objectively measured OPO performance and utilization of deceased donor kidneys. We found that although donor recovery declined with rising age and kidney donor profile index (KDPI), OPO performance differences were evident within each age/KDPI group. By contrast, the number of discards per donor did not vary with OPO performance. Centers in donor service areas (DSAs) with lower-performing OPOs had higher local utilization and greater import of high-KDPI kidneys than did those with higher-performing OPOs. Lower rates of donor availability relative to waitlist additions may contribute to observed center acceptance behavior. Differences in center-level performance were highly visible in Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) organ acceptance metrics, while SRTR OPO metrics did not detect large or persistent variation in procurement performance. Cumulatively, our findings suggest that objective measures of procurement performance can inform discussions of organ utilization, allowing for alignment of metrics in all elements of the procurement-transplantation system.

Abstract 13291: Assessing Organ Procurement Organization Performance Across the Different Routes to Deceased Organ Donation

Introduction: Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are responsible for organ donor recruitment which can occur via donor registries or next-of-kin consent. Donor conversion rate is a metric used to assess OPO performance, reflecting the number of donors per eligible death. However, OPOs are not directly responsible for the success of donor registration. This study aims to describe the trends in donor recruitment via registries and next-of-kin consent, report the relationship between consent mechanisms, and assess the variability across OPOs. Methods: The SRTR database was queried for all eligible deaths (2008-2019), stratified by consent mechanism (Fig A). Trends were assessed over time. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for population demographic differences. Linear regression assessed the association between donor registration and next-of-kin consent at the OPO level. The probability of next-of-kin consent was assessed across OPOs after adjusting for population differences. Results: Donor registration has increased over time with a concurrent decrease in next-of-kin consent (Fig B &amp; C). At the OPO level, an increase in donor registration is associated with lower next-of-kin consent rates. However, there are OPOs that demonstrate a high probability of next-of-kin consent in the face of highly successful donor registration (Fig D). The success of next-of-kin consent is highly variable across OPOs, even after adjusting for population demographic differences (Fig E). Conclusions: Utilization of registries for donor recruitment has increased over time while next-of-kin consent has declined. Donor conversion rate provides an incomplete assessment of OPO performance and may artificially favor OPOs in regions with highly successful donor registration practices. There is significant variability across OPOs in next-of-kin consent. Knowledge of detailed donor recruitment data may allow OPOs to better target areas for improvement.

Kidney Allocation: The Path Forward.

Kidney Allocation: The Path Forward.

Public discourse and policy change: Absence of harm from increased oversight and transparency in OPO performance

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced changes to the Final Rule for organ procurement organizations (OPOs) in November 2020, after a 23-month period of public debate. One concern among transplant stakeholders was that public focus on OPO underperformance would harm deceased donation. Using CDC-WONDER data, we studied whether donation performance dropped during the era of public debate about OPO reform (December 2018-February 2020). Overall OPO performance as measured relative to cause, age, and location-consistent deaths rose by 12.3% in 2019, compared to a median annual change of 2.5% 2009-2019. Organ recoveries exceeded seasonally adjusted forecasts by 4.2% in the first half of 2019, by 8.1% following the Executive Order issuing a mandate for OPO metric reform, and by 14.1% between the Notice of Public Rule Making and the onset of COVID-19-related systemic disruptions. We describe changes in donor phenotype in the period of increased performance; improvement was greatest for older and donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors, and among decedents who did not have a drug-related mechanism of death. In summary, performance during an era of intense public debate and proposed regulatory changes yielded 692 additional donors over expectations, and no detriment to organ donation was observed.

A machine learning approach for the prediction of overall deceased donor organ yield

BackgroundOptimizing organ yield (number of organs transplanted per donor) is a potentially modifiable way to increase the number of organs available for transplant. Models to predict the expected deceased donor organ yield have been developed based on ordinary least squares regression and logistic regression. However, alternative modeling methodologies incorporating machine learning may have superior performance compared with conventional approaches. MethodsWe evaluated the predictive accuracy of 14 machine learning models for predicting overall organ yield in a cross-validation procedure. The models were parameterized using data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database from 2000 to 2018. The inclusion criteria for the study were adult deceased donors between 18 and 84 years of age that had at least 1 organ procured for transplantation. ResultsA total of 89,520 donors met the inclusion criteria. Their mean (standard deviation) age was 44 (15) years, and approximately 58% were male. Our cross-validation analysis showed that a tree-based gradient boosting model outperformed the remaining 13 models. Compared with the currently used prediction models, the gradient boosting model improves prediction accuracy by reducing the mean absolute error between 3 and 11 organs per 100 donors. ConclusionOur analysis demonstrated that the gradient boosting methodology had the best performance in predicting overall deceased donor organ yield and can potentially serve as an aid to assess organ procurement organization performance.

Evaluating Spatial Associations in Inpatient Deaths Between Organ Procurement Organizations.

To account for the geographic variation in OPO performance and organ availability across the United States, we utilized spatial analysis to appraise the newly proposed metric of inpatient deaths. Using spatial clustering that accounts for geographic relationships between Organ Procurement Organizations, the top 5 causes of donation-eligible death, and inpatient deaths, we identified 4 unique OPO clusters. Each group had a distinct demographic composition, cause of death, and inpatient death pattern. In multivariate analysis accounting for these geographic relationships, the spatial clusters remained significantly associated with the outcome of inpatient deaths (P < 0.001) and were the best-fitting model compared with models without the spatial clusters; this suggests that further risk adjustment of inpatient deaths should include these geographic considerations. This approach provides not only a manner to assess donor potential by improving risk adjustment but also an opportunity to further explore geographic and spatial relationships in the practice of organ transplantation and OPO performance.

Navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial impacts and responses of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in the United States.

COVID‐19 has been sweeping the globe, hitting the United States particularly hard with a state of emergency declared on March 13, 2020. Transplant hospitals have taken various precautions to protect patients from potential exposure. OPTN donor, candidate, and transplant data were analyzed from January 5, 2020 to September 5, 2020. The number of new waiting list registrations decreased, with the Northeast seeing over a 50% decrease from the week of 3/8 versus the week of 4/5. The national transplant system saw near cessation of living donor transplantation (−90%) from the week of 3/8 to the week of 4/5. Similarly, deceased donor kidney transplant volume dropped from 367 to 202 (−45%), and other organs saw similar decreases: lung (−70%), heart (−43%), and liver (−37%). Deceased donors recovered dropped from 260 to 163 (−45%) from 3/8 compared to 4/5, including a 67% decrease for lungs recovered. The magnitude of this decrease varied by geographic area, with the largest percent change (−67%) in the Northeast. Despite the pandemic, discard rates across organ has remained stable. Although the COVID‐19 pandemic continues to evolve, OPTN data show recent evidence of stabilization, an indication that an early recovery of the number of living and deceased donors and transplants has ensued.

Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics

Organ transplant is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage organ failure. In the US, organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are responsible for the evaluation and procurement of organs from donors who have died; however, there is controversy regarding what measures should be used to evaluate their performance. To evaluate OPO performance metrics using combined mortality and donation data and quantify the associations of population demographics with donation metrics. This national cohort study includes data from the US organ transplantation system from January 2008 through December 2017. All individuals who died within the US, as reported by the National Death index, were included. Death, organ donation, and donation eligibility. Evaluation of the variation in donation metrics and the use of ineligible donors by OPO and demographic subgroup. This study included 17 501 742 deaths and 75 769 deceased organ donors (45 040 men [59.4%]; 51 908 White individuals [68.5%]). Of these donors, 15 857 (20.9%) were not eligible, as defined by the OPOs. The median donation metrics by OPO were 0.004 (range, 0.002-0.012) donors per death, 0.89 (range, 0.68-1.30) donors per eligible death, and 0.72 (range, 0.57-0.86) eligible donors per eligible death. The OPOs in the upper quartile of the overall eligible donors per eligible death metric were in the upper quartile of annual rankings on 90 of 140 occasions (64.3%). There was little overlap in top-performing OPOs between metrics; an OPO in the upper quartile for 1 metric was also in the upper quartile for the other metrics on 37 of 570 occasions (6.5% of the time). The median donor eligibility rate, defined as the number of eligible donors per donor, was 0.79 (range, 0.61-0.95) across OPOs. Age (eg, 65 to 84 years, coefficient, -0.55 [SE, 0.03]; P < .001; vs those aged 18 to 34 years), sex (male individuals, -0.09 [SE, 0.02]; P < .001; vs female individuals), race (eg, Black individuals, 0.35 [SE, 0.02]; P < .001; vs White individuals), cause of death (eg, central nervous system tumor, 0.48 [SE, 0.08]; P < .001; vs anoxia), year (eg, 2016-2017: -0.10 [SE, 0.03]; P < .001; vs 2008-2009), and OPO were associated with the use of ineligible donors; OPO was a significant factor associated with performance in all metrics (χ256, 500.5; P < .001; coefficient range across individual OPOs, -0.15 [SE, 0.09] to 0.75 [SE, 0.09]), even after accounting for population differences. Female and non-White individuals were significantly less likely to be used as ineligible donors. We demonstrate significant variability in OPO performance rankings, depending on which donation metric is used. There were significant differences in OPO performance, even after accounting for differences in potential donor populations. Our data suggest significant variation in use of ineligible donors among OPOs, a source for increased donors. The performance of OPOs should be evaluated using a range of donation metrics.

Maximizing donors' gifts: A comparison of actual and expected solid organ yield among VCA donors.

Vascularized Composite Allograft (VCA) transplantation provides life-changing transplants, but VCA adds complexity to the donation process and timing, possibly impeding solid organ donation. Expanding upon descriptive analyses, this study examines risk-adjusted predictions versus the observed number of organs donated by VCA donors. Our cohort included VCA donors in the United States during January 1, 2008-December 31, 2017 (n=51), using OPTN Deceased Donor Registration Form data and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) donor yield models to calculate observed-to-expected (O:E) yield ratios. Almost all VCA donors' livers (48/51; 94.1%) and kidneys (92/102; 90.2%) were transplanted, with fewer hearts (28/51; 54.9%), lungs (46/102; 45.1%), pancreata (15/51; 29.4%), and intestines (3/51; 5.9%) transplanted. O:E ratios for overall organ yield were slightly greater than expected for VCA donors (1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.17). Liver (1.17: 1.08-1.27) and lung yields (1.38: 1.07-1.68) were both greater than expected, while kidney, heart, and pancreas yields were similar to expected. Across VCA types, bilateral upper limb and abdominal wall donors had better-than-expected yields while uterus, face, and unilateral upper limb donors all had similar-to-expected yields. Solid organ yield among VCA donors was as good or better than predicted, suggesting that VCA donation does not compromise recovery and transplantation of lifesaving organs.

Rapid improvement in organ procurement organization performance: Potential for change and impact of new leadership.

Recently proposed rulemaking from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services would change how organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are evaluated. The proposals include using national inpatient death data to define a standardized denominator to calculate comparable donation rates among OPOs. Based on these objective metrics, OPOs not performing at a prespecified threshold will be required to rapidly improve performance to avoid decertification. We sought to determine whether rapid OPO improvement was possible based on objective donation metrics, and whether leadership change was associated with rapid improvement. We evaluated United Network for Organ Sharing and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data from 2011 to 2018, and measured donation rates using CDC data on inpatient deaths from causes consistent with donation, based on the location of deaths. During the two 4-year cycles, we found that an OPO's ranking relative to other OPOs was fairly static, with more than 90% of the OPOs at risk of flagging at the end of each 4-year cycle (2014, 2018) being in the bottom 75% of OPOs in the preceding 3 years. In multivariable logistic regression models, leadership changes were only statistically significantly associated with an improvement in OPO rankings during the 2011-2014 cycle. These data demonstrate that rapid improvements in OPO performance are uncommon, and while leadership changes increase the odds of rapid improvement, they do not guarantee improvement.

4139 Risk Aversion in Lung Transplantation: Organ Procurement Organizations Differ in Willingness to Pursue Non-ideal Donor Organs

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Lung transplant (LTx) candidates benefit from use of non-ideal donor organs. Each organ procurement organization (OPO) defines “acceptable” donor organs introducing unmeasured variation in donor pursuit. We characterized non-ideal donor pursuit among OPOs to identify drivers of risk aversion in LTx. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We queried the UNOS registry for adult donors who donated ≥1 organ for transplantation from 12/2007-12/2018. Non-ideal donors were those with any of age&gt;50, smoking history ≥20 pack-years, PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio&lt;350, donation after cardiac death (DCD) status, or CDC increased risk (IRD) status. Non-ideal donor pursuit rate was defined as the proportion of non-ideal donors at each OPO from whom consent for lung donation was requested with lower numbers indicating increased risk aversion. We estimated the correlation between non-ideal and overall donor pursuit using a Spearman correlation coefficient. Adjusted non-ideal donor pursuit rates were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Overall, 18,333 deceased donors were included and classified as ideal or non-ideal. Among 58 OPOs, rates of non-ideal donor pursuit ranged from 0.24-1.00 Figure). Of 5 non-ideal characteristics, DCD and IRD status were associated with the most and least risk aversion, respectively. Non-ideal donor pursuit was strongly correlated with overall donor pursuit (r = 0.99). On adjusted analysis, older age (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.13-0.16), smoking history (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.34-0.44), low P/F ratio (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.11-0.14), and DCD status (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.03-0.04) were all independently associated with significant risk aversion, corresponding to decreased rates of donor pursuit. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: OPOs differ in their levels of risk aversion in LTx and risk aversion is not uniform across selected categories of non-ideal lung donor. Consideration of new OPO performance metrics that encourage the pursuit of non-ideal lung donors is warranted.

Rejecting bias: The case against race adjustment for OPO performance in communities of color.

In December of 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) put out a notice of proposed rule-making for 42 CFR Part 486, specifically the section that covers the organ procurement organization (OPO) Conditions for Coverage. Most crucially, the proposed rule included two new OPO performance metrics using objective, standardized data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These new metrics would employ a denominator that included inpatient deaths from certain causes that could lead to organ donation, rather than the current unverifiable eligible death metric. Although there has been near-uniform support for replacing the eligible death denominator with CDC data, a source of contention is CMS's proposal not to adjust risk for race in their OPO outcome. Nonetheless, there have been calls for race and ethnicity to be included as risk-adjusted variables in the CMS donation metric. Herein, we lay out an argument as to why inclusion of race and ethnicity as risk adjustment variables in an OPO performance metric is not only statistically suspect but also will hide the inequities that are detrimental to optimal system performance and assurance that all patients have timely access to donation.