Oral Dose Of Moxifloxacin Research Articles

Oral absorption and drug interaction kinetics of moxifloxacin in an animal model of weightlessness

To investigate the effect of simulated weightlessness on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered moxifloxacin and the antacid Maalox or the antidiarrheal Pepto-Bismol using a tail-suspended (TS) rat model of microgravity. Fasted control and TS, jugular-vein-cannulated, male Sprague-Dawley rats received either a single 5 mg/kg intravenous dose or a single 10 mg/kg oral dose of moxifloxacin alone or with a 0.625 mL/kg oral dose of Maalox or a 1.43 mL/kg oral dose of Pepto-Bismol. Plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin were measured by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using WinNonlin. Simulated weightlessness had no effect on moxifloxacin disposition after intravenous administration but significantly decreased the extent of moxifloxacin oral absorption. The coadministration of moxifloxacin with Maalox to either control or TS rats caused significant reductions in the rate and extent of moxifloxacin absorption. In contrast, the coadministration of moxifloxacin with Pepto-Bismol to TS rats had no significant effect on either the rate or the extent of moxifloxacin absorption. These interactions showed dose staggering when oral administrations of Pepto-Bismol and moxifloxacin were separated by 60 min in control rats but not in TS rats. Dose staggering was more apparent after the coadministration of Maalox and moxifloxacin in TS rats.

Intravenous Dosing as an Alternate Approach to Safely Achieve Supratherapeutic Exposure for Assessments of Cardiac Repolarization: A Randomized Clinical Trial with Mavoglurant (AFQ056)

PurposeThe conduct of thorough QTc (TQT) studies is often challenging with compounds that are characterized by limited tolerability in healthy individuals. This is applicable to several central nervous system drugs, including mavoglurant acting as a selective allosteric modulator of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5. This TQT study describes the use of a single intravenous dosing regimen as an alternate approach allowing for sufficiently high Cmax values while controlling tolerability. MethodsThis study was a randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, 4-period, crossover, TQT study composed of 2 sequential phases. In the pilot phase, the safety and tolerability profile of 10-minute infusions of 25, 37.5, and 50 mg of mavoglurant was assessed in 36 healthy individuals. In the TQT phase, individuals received in random sequence single intravenous doses of mavoglurant (25 and 50 mg) and placebo and an oral dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg). FindingsMavoglurant was well tolerated up to a single intravenous dose of 50 mg, and supratherapeutic Cmax values were achieved that were approximately 2-fold higher than at the multiple maximum tolerated dose and more than 3-fold higher relative to therapeutic plasma concentrations. The upper bound of the 2-sided 90% CI of Fridericia-corrected placebo- and baseline-adjusted QTc intervals (QTcFs) did not exceed 10 milliseconds at any postdose time point for both mavoglurant doses. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed the lack of an association between mavoglurant plasma concentrations and ΔΔQTcF data over the entire range of plasma concentration data at 25 and 50 mg of mavoglurant. An outlier analysis revealed no individuals with newly identified QTcF intervals >480 milliseconds or any QTcF prolongations >60 milliseconds compared with baseline in any of the treatment groups. Hence, the lack of any clinically relevant QTc prolongation was found for therapeutic and supratherapeutic single intravenous doses of 25 and 50 mg of mavoglurant. ImplicationsThis TQT study describes the use of single intravenous dosing as an alternate approach to achieve supratherapeutic plasma concentrations as required per the International Council for Harmonisation E14 guideline with compounds characterized by exposure related tolerability limitations. The increased Cmax/AUC ratio compared with conventional oral dosing may contribute to a reduced incidence of adverse events that appear more related to overall exposure.

A Simple LC/MS/MS Method for the Determination of Moxifloxacin N-Sulfate in Rat Plasma and Its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Study

Moxifloxacin N-sulfate is one of the main metabolites of moxifloxacin in phase II metabolism mediated by sulfotransferases. In this study, a simple, rapid, and sensitive LC/MS/MS method with one-step protein precipitation with methanol was developed and validated to quantify the concentration of moxifloxacin N-sulfate in rat plasma. The chromatographic separation was accomplished by using an Agilent Extend C18 column (4.6×250 mm; 5 μm) with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and distilled water (30:70, v/v) containing 5 mM ammonium formate (pH=8.82 adjusted by ammonia) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. A triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization source was used as a detector operated by multiple reaction monitoring in the negative-ion mode with m/z 480.2/436.3. The calibration curve was linear ranging from 2 to 200 ng/mL. The intraday and interday precision values (RSD) were less than 7.10%, and the intraday and interday accuracy values (relative error) were within -0.40 to 4.99%. Stabilities of all QC samples were within general assay acceptability criteria according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines. No considerable matrix effect was found. A pharmacokinetic study of moxifloxacin N-sulfate after a single oral dose of moxifloxacin in rats was carried out using this new method.

Pharmacokinetics of Moxifloxacin in Patients Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

To investigate the effect of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) on plasma and peritoneal fluid concentration and pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin after administration of one 400 mg dose orally to end-stage renal failure patients undergoing CAPD. Blood and peritoneal samples were collected from 8 patients at standard time intervals and concentrations of moxifloxacin were estimated by HPLC analysis with fluorometric and ultraviolet detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using standard noncompartmental methods. Median maximum plasma moxifloxacin concentration was 5.86 mg/L at a median time of 1.25 hours. In serum, median area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-->inf)) was 157.95 +/- 100.34 mg.hour/L, median t(1/2) 25.00 hours, median clearance 2.54 L/hour, and median distribution volume 94.90 L. Median peritoneal fluid-to-plasma ratio of moxifloxacin ranged between 0.84 and 1.00, denoting adequate penetration and lack of considerable moxifloxacin removal during CAPD. Maximum moxifloxacin concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and AUC(0-->24)/MIC ratios were above the cutoff points that indicate clinical success. A single 400 mg oral dose of moxifloxacin is safe, presents rapid peritoneal fluid penetration, has similar plasma and peritoneal fluid pharmacokinetics, and should therefore be efficacious in the treatment of CAPD-induced peritonitis.

VITREAL PENETRATION OF ORAL MOXIFLOXACIN IN HUMANS

To investigate the vitreal penetration of moxifloxacin after oral administration. Prospective, nonrandomized clinical series. Twenty-four patients (mean age = 62.8 years) undergoing elective pars plana vitrectomy were assigned to a dosing group: control (n = 3), which received no medication; single-dose (n = 11), which received one 400 mg oral dose of moxifloxacin 3 hours before surgery; and five-dose (n = 10), which received one 400 mg dose on each of the 4 days preceding surgery and a fifth dose 3 hours before surgery. Vitreous samples were obtained and analyzed. Control, below quantifiable levels; single-dose, 0.572 +/- 0.239 microg/mL; and five-dose, 1.200 +/- 0.645 microg/mL. Five doses of oral moxifloxacin lead to higher intravitreal drug concentrations than single-dose administration. Both regimens, however, achieve levels that exceed the MIC90 of many bacteria implicated in postoperative endophthalmitis.

Vitreal Penetration of Oral and Topical Moxifloxacin in Humans

To investigate the vitreal penetration of moxifloxacin after oral and topical administration. Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. Twenty-four patients were assigned to one of four dosing groups: control (n = 3), which received no medication; oral (n = 8), which received two 400 mg oral doses of moxifloxacin before surgery; topical (n = 8), which received one drop of topical moxifloxacin 0.5% every 15 minutes for the hour preceding surgery; and combined (n = 5), which received two 400 mg oral doses and one drop of topical moxifloxacin 0.5% hourly for 18 hours prior to surgery. Vitreous samples were obtained and analyzed. Control, below quantifiable levels; oral, 1.553 +/- 0.33 microg/ml; topical, 0.027 microg/ml; and combined, 2.219 +/- 0.71 microg/ml. One topical patient developed postoperative endophthalmitis. In contrast to topical moxifloxacin, oral moxifloxacin achieves significant levels in the noninflamed human vitreous.

Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to compare the pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against 3 Staphylococcus aureus and 3 Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. Logarithmic-phase cultures were inoculated into the peripheral compartment of hollow-fiber cartridges and exposed to the peak serum concentrations achieved in humans with oral doses of moxifloxacin (400 mg) and levofloxacin (500 mg). Drugs were added at 0 and 24 h, elimination kinetics were simulated, and changes in viable bacterial counts were evaluated over the course of 36 h. Moxifloxacin was bactericidal against all 6 staphylococci (times to 99.9% kill, 1-3 h). Against most strains, bacterial killing continued through 36 h, with total kills exceeding 5.5 logs. Levofloxacin was bactericidal against 5 of the strains, with similar times to 99.9% kill. In contrast to moxifloxacin, however, resistant subpopulations emerged in 4 strains during therapy with levofloxacin, and this could have important implications for treatment of staphylococcal infections. These in vitro observations warrant the clinical evaluation of moxifloxacin in the treatment of staphylococcal infections.