Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Research Articles

Management of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and atrial fibrillation: We are still far from precision medicine.

The use of anticoagulation therapy could prove to be controversial when trying to balance ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding risks in patients with concurrent cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In fact, CAA is an age-related cerebral vasculopathy that predisposes patients to intracerebral hemorrhage. Nevertheless, many AF patients require oral systemic dose-adjusted warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (such as factor Xa inhibitors) or direct thrombin inhibitors to control often associated with cardioembolic stroke risk. The prevalence of both CAA and AF is expected to rise, due to the aging of the population. This clinical dilemma is becoming increasingly common. In patients with coexisting AF and CAA, the risks/benefits profile of anticoagulant therapy must be assessed for each patient individually due to the lack of a clear-cut consensus with regard to its risks in scientific literature. This review aims to provide an overview of the management of patients with concomitant AF and CAA and proposes the implementation of a risk-based decision-making algorithm.

How do oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and oral factor Xa inhibitors compare with conventional anticoagulation for the treatment of pulmonary embolism?

How do oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and oral factor Xa inhibitors compare with conventional anticoagulation for the treatment of pulmonary embolism?

How do oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) compare with standard anticoagulation for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis?

How do oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) compare with standard anticoagulation for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis?

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitorsversus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition in which a clot can migrate from the deep veins, most commonly in the leg, to the lungs. Conventional treatment of PE used unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Recently, two forms of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed: oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and oral factor Xa inhibitors. DOACs have characteristics that may be favourable to conventional treatment, including oral administration, a predictable effect, no need for frequent monitoring or re-dosing, and few known drug interactions. This review reports the efficacy and safety of these drugs in the long-term treatment of PE (minimum duration of three months). This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2015. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of oral DTIs and oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the long-term treatment of PE. The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 2 March 2022. We checked the reference lists of relevant articles for additional studies. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which people with a PE confirmed by standard imaging techniques were allocated to receive an oral DTI or an oral factor Xa inhibitor compared with a conventional anticoagulant or compared with each other for the long-term treatment of PE (minimum duration three months). We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were recurrent PE, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and health-related quality of life. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We identified five additional RCTs with 1484 participants for this update. Together with the previously included trials, we have included ten RCTs with a total of 13,073 participants. Two studies investigated an oral DTI (dabigatran) and eight studies investigated oral factor Xa inhibitors (three rivaroxaban, three apixaban, and two edoxaban). The studies were of good methodological quality overall. Meta-analysis showed no clear difference in the efficacy and safety of oral DTI compared with conventional anticoagulation in preventing recurrent PE (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 2.04; 2 studies, 1602 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), recurrent VTE (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.66; 2 studies, 1602 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), DVT (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.29 to 2.13; 2 studies, 1602 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and major bleeding (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.68; 2 studies, 1527 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence by one level for imprecision due to the low number of events. There was also no clear difference between the oral factor Xa inhibitors and conventional anticoagulation in the prevention of recurrent PE (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.29; 3 studies, 8186 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), recurrent VTE (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.03; 8 studies, 11,416 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), DVT (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25; 2 studies, 8151 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.70; 1 study, 4817 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and major bleeding (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.41; 8 studies, 11,447 participants; low-certainty evidence); the heterogeneity for major bleeding was significant (I2 = 79%). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence to moderate and low because of imprecision due to the low number of events and inconsistency due to clinical heterogeneity. None of the included studies measured health-related quality of life. Available evidence shows there is probably little or no difference between DOACs and conventional anticoagulation in the prevention of recurrent PE, recurrent VTE, DVT, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding. The certainty of evidence was moderate or low. Future large clinical trials are required to identify if individual drugs differ in effectiveness and bleeding risk, and to explore effect differences in subgroups, including people with cancer and obesity.

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a condition in which a clot forms in the deep veins, most commonly of the leg. It occurs in approximately one in 1000 people. If left untreated, the clot can travel up to the lungs and cause a potentially life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Previously, a DVT was treated with the anticoagulants heparin and vitamin K antagonists. However, two forms of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed: oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and oral factor Xa inhibitors, which have characteristics that may be favourable compared to conventional treatment, including oral administration, a predictable effect, lack of frequent monitoring or dose adjustment and few known drug interactions. DOACs are now commonly being used for treating DVT: recent guidelines recommended DOACs over conventional anticoagulants for both DVT and PE treatment. This Cochrane Review was first published in 2015. It was the first systematic review to measure the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in the treatment of DVT. This is an update of the 2015 review. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral DTIs and oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the long-term treatment of DVT. The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.govtrials registers to 1 March 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which people with a DVT, confirmed by standard imaging techniques, were allocated to receive an oral DTI or an oral factor Xa inhibitor compared with conventional anticoagulation or compared with each other for the treatment of DVT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), recurrent DVT and PE. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and quality of life (QoL). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We identified 10 new studies with 2950 participants for this update. In total, we included 21 RCTs involving 30,895 participants. Three studies investigated oral DTIs (two dabigatran and one ximelagatran), 17 investigated oral factor Xa inhibitors (eight rivaroxaban, five apixaban and four edoxaban) and one three-arm trial investigated both a DTI (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban). Overall, the studies were of good methodological quality. Meta-analysis comparing DTIs to conventional anticoagulation showed no clear difference in the rate of recurrent VTE (odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.65; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), recurrent DVT (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.66; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), fatal PE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.29 to 6.02; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), non-fatal PE (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.59; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.08; 1 study, 2489 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). DTIs reduced the rate of major bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.89; 3 studies, 5994 participants; high-certainty evidence). For oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with conventional anticoagulation, meta-analysis demonstrated no clear difference in recurrent VTE (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; 13 studies, 17,505 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), recurrent DVT (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.01; 9 studies, 16,439 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), fatal PE (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.02; 6 studies, 15,082 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), non-fatal PE (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.27; 7 studies, 15,166 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.14; 9 studies, 10,770 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-analysis showed a reduced rate of major bleeding with oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with conventional anticoagulation (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89; 17 studies, 18,066 participants; high-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current review suggests that DOACs may be superior to conventional therapy in terms of safety (major bleeding), and are probably equivalent in terms of efficacy. There is probably little or no difference between DOACs and conventional anticoagulation in the prevention of recurrent VTE, recurrent DVT, pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality. DOACs reduced the rate of major bleeding compared to conventional anticoagulation. The certainty of evidence was moderate or high.

Dabigatran: Clinical correlation of drug and its dose with risk of stroke and bleeding.

Dabigatran is the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor which is endorsed by Food and Drug Administration in the prevention of embolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Suitable dose of the drug for the patient is selected based on CHA2DS2-VASc score and HAS-BLED score. To determine and compare the risk of occurrence of stroke and bleeding after the initiation of dabigatran therapy in patients prescribed with this drug. Patients with more than 18 years who were prescribed with dabigatran during 2017-2019 in a tertiary care hospital were selected for the study. Most of the patient's prescriptions contained an antiplatelet, so a comparison was made between the clinical outcomes of patients given with dabigatran alone and dabigatran with an antiplatelet because antiplatelet can have effects on the safety as well as efficacy profile of dabigatran. Out of 75 patients enrolled in the study, 42 patients were in the dabigatran with the antiplatelet group and 33 were in the dabigatran alone group. In both the groups, there was a significant reduction in CHA2DS2-VASc score, i.e., 2.58 ± 1.32-1.94 ± 1.21 in dabigatran-treated patients within 6 months, and the score was lowered from 3.76 ± 1.22 to 2.92 ± 1.22 in other groups. The mean value of the HAS-BLED score of dabigatran was reduced from 1.15 ± 0.83 to 0.84 ± 0.78 and that of dabigatran with antiplatelet group from 2.10 ± 0.94 to 1.74 ± 0.92. It was observed that within 6 months, both the treatment groups showed a reduction in the risk scores. The dabigatran group had lower background risks of stroke and bleeding in comparison to the dabigatran plus antiplatelet group.

ダビガトラン過量服薬に対するイダルシズマブの静脈内投与：血漿中ダビガトラン濃度と血液凝固能の関連性(Intravenous idarucizumab for dabigatran overdose: association between plasma dabigatran concentration and coagulation profile)

要旨ダビガトランは直接トロンビンを阻害することで抗凝固作用を示す経口抗凝固薬であり，近年処方機会が急増している。過量内服症例における，血漿中ダビガトラン濃度および血液凝固能の推移に関するデータは不足している。腎機能障害のない，非弁膜症性心房細動をもつ71歳邦人女性が近医より処方されていたダビガトランを合計7,480mg自殺目的に過量内服し，当院に搬送された。過量内服4時間後の血漿中ダビガトラン濃度は4,217ng/mL（治療域濃度100～400ng/mL）であり，APTTは160.3秒，PT–INRは9.46であった。イダルシズマブ5g経静脈投与後，血漿中ダビガトラン濃度は経時的に低下し，それに伴いAPTTとPT–INRも正常化した。血漿中ダビガトラン濃度とAPTT（R2=0.9898），およびPT–INR（R2=0.9998）との間には強固な関連性が認められた。本症例は第9病日に後遺症なく独歩退院した。治療域の40倍の血漿中濃度を示すダビガトラン大量内服症例において，イダルシズマブは血漿中ダビガトラン濃度を安全に，かつ効果的に低下させた。また，血液凝固能は，血漿中ダビガトラン濃度を強固に反映した。本症例により，一般的な血液凝固能検査を用いることで，ダビガトランの血中薬物動態を推定できる可能性が示された。

Thrombin Generation Is Differentially Affected By Anticoagulants in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - an Ex-Vivo Study

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) reduces the risk of VTE in ALL, but is not well tolerated in children. VTE rates remain unacceptably high in adults despite LMWH prophylaxis. Thus, novel strategies for VTE prevention are warranted. In the primary analysis of the PREVAPIX-ALL trial there was no statistically significant reduction in VTE among children treated with the oral factor Xa inhibitor, apixaban, compared to no anticoagulation (AC). Comparative data on activity of different anticoagulants are needed to guide planning of VTE prophylaxis trials. Aims: To characterize and compare the ex-vivo effect of LMWH (enoxaparin), oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban) and oral direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) in ALL patients' samples using thrombin generation (TG). Methods: A prospective observational cohort study of 46 children with newly-diagnosed ALL, treated with the L-asparaginase (ASP)-based BFM protocol, at a tertiary medical center. Patients on therapeutic-dose AC at baseline were excluded. Blood samples were drawn before ASP treatment (ALL-Day0) and 7 days after (ALL-Day7). Normal pooled plasma (NP) was collected from healthy adult volunteers. Samples were spiked ex-vivo with enoxaparin [0.2 U/mL], apixaban [39 ng/mL], rivaroxaban [39 ng/mL] and dabigatran [150 ng/mL] or vehicle (i.e., control). AC concentrations chosen based on 50% peak reduction (for Xa inhibitors) or 200% LT prolongation (for dabigatran) in NP. Subsequently, TG was performed initiated using 5 pM tissue factor in the presence of 4 µM phospholipids using Calibrated Automated Thrombogram method in these samples. Results are expressed as peak height (PH) and lag time (LT) and relative reduction or prolongation (% difference in PH or LT, respectively) in plasma samples spiked with anticoagulants compared to control. Reduction in PH reflects enoxaparin, apixaban and rivaroxaban activity, while LT prolongation indicates dabigatran activity. This report focuses on measures reflecting the activity of each drug. Descriptive statistics were used to show the median [interquartile range (IQR)] for continuous variables and percentages for categorical data. T-Test / Mann-Whitney U test and paired T-test / Wilcoxon test used to compare between paired and non-paired samples, respectively. Results: Selected sample characteristics are as follows: median age, 7.75 years [IQR 3.73-11.93]; 19 (41%) females; median BMI, 16.8 [IQR 15.5-19.9]; B-cell precursor immunophenotype in 33 (71.7%) and T-cell in 13 (28.3%); prior VTE in 1 (2%). Median PH [IQR] in control samples (without AC) was 256.6 [252.6-265.3] nmol/l, 396.0 [347.2-464.7] nmol/l and 354.4 [307.1-407.4] nmol/l in NP, ALL-Day0 and ALL-Day7 respectively. Median LT [IQR] in control samples was 2.7 [2.5-2.83] nmol/l, 1.8 [1.7-2.3] nmol/l and 1.7 [1.6-2] nmol/l in NP, ALL-Day0 and ALL-Day7 respectively. Median % differences in PH and LT between samples spiked with different anticoagulants and controls are shown in Figure 1A and Figure 1B, respectively. Enoxaparin, apixaban and rivaroxaban reduced PH in NP, ALL-Day0 and ALL-Day7 samples (p<0.0005). There was less reduction in PH with enoxaparin, apixaban and rivaroxaban in ALL-Day0 samples than in NP (p=0.029, p<0.0005, p<0.0005 respectively), suggesting reduced anticoagulant activity in ALL patients compared to subjects without ALL. LT was prolonged with dabigatran in NP, ALL-Day0 and ALL-Day7 samples (p<0.05). Dabigatran resulted in a similar LT prolongation in ALL-Day0 and NP (p=0.677), suggesting a preserved AC effect in ALL. There was less LT prolongation in ALL-Day7 (134% [123-175%] than in ALL-Day0 (180% [134-238]; p=0.031). This reflects an ongoing dabigatran effect after ASP, albeit to a lesser degree. Conclusions: Our ex-vivo results suggest limited anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin and lack of anticoagulant activity of apixaban and rivaroxaban (both factor Xa inhibitors) in preventing VTE in ALL, in line with prior clinical data. In contrast, dabigatran etexilate, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor not previously tested in ALL, exhibited preserved anticoagulant activity in ALL patients, even after exposure to ASP. This may suggest that dabigatran should be investigated in clinical studies for the unmet need of VTE prophylaxis in ALL. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Only direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs; argatroban, bivalirudin, and lepirudin) have been approved for treatment of acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, parenteral administration and hospitalization costs have contributed to growing interest in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; ie, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran) for treating HIT. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with HIT who were treated with either DOACs or DTIs.

Anticoagulant Effects of Dabigatran on Coagulation Laboratory Parameters in Pediatric Patients: Combined Data from Five Pediatric Clinical Trials.

Background Dabigatran etexilate, a direct oral thrombin inhibitor, is approved to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in both adults and children. Objectives This population analysis characterized relationships between dabigatran total plasma concentrations and coagulation laboratory parameters (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]; diluted thrombin time [dTT]; ecarin clotting time [ECT]). Methods Data from three phase 2a and one single-arm and one randomized, comparative phase 2b/3 pediatric studies (measurements: aPTT 2,925 [ N = 358]; dTT 2,348 [ N = 324]; ECT 2,929 [ N = 357]) were compared with adult data (5,740 aPTT, 3,472 dTT, 3,817 ECT measurements; N = 1,978). Population models were fitted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Covariates (e.g., sex, age) were assessed on baseline and drug-effect parameters, using a stepwise covariate model-building procedure. Results Overall, relationships between dabigatran, aPTT, dTT, and ECT were similar in children and adults. For children aged <6 months, a higher proportion of baseline samples were outside or close to the upper aPTT and ECT adult ranges. No age-related differences were detected for dTT. With increasing dabigatran concentration, aPTT rose nonlinearly (half the maximum effect at 368 ng/mL dabigatran) while dTT and ECT increased linearly (0.37 and 0.73% change per ng/mL dabigatran, respectively). Mean baseline aPTT (45 vs. 36 seconds) and ECT (40 vs. 36 seconds) were slightly increased for those aged <6 months versus older children. Conclusion The similar relationships of laboratory parameters observed across pediatric age groups suggests that developmental changes in the hemostatic system may have little effect on response to dabigatran.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of dabigatran peak and trough concentration in adults.

Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor used in preventing thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and several other conditions. Routine dabigatran concentration monitoring is not recommended in clinical practice; however, measurement of dabigatran concentration may be required in several conditions. This study aims to pool the peak and trough dabigatran concentration from real-world studies. A systematic review was performed to identify studies that measured the peak and trough dabigatran concentrations. Observational studies reporting dabigatran peak or trough concentrations and patients' clinical characteristics of either sex, age or weight were included. Random-effect meta-analyses and metaregression were conducted to pool dabigatran concentrations and to identify the correlation between factors affecting dabigatran concentrations. Fifteen studies with a total of 1226 patients were included. The pooled peak dabigatran concentration was 133 ng/mL (95% CI: 113-154, I2 = 86%, n =655), while the pooled dabigatran trough concentration was 80 ng/mL (95% CI: 69-91, I2 = 93%, n =1010). Metaregression analyses suggested that age is significantly correlated to trough concentration, while body weight and creatinine clearance significantly correlated to peak concentration. Subgroup results revealed that dabigatran concentration when measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was higher than haemoclot thrombin inhibitor assay. Several guidelines have proposed dabigatran concentrations target range and the pooled dabigatran concentrations were in line with the suggested range. Further studies to correlate dabigatran concentrations and clinical outcomes is warranted to improve the safety and efficacy monitoring of dabigatran therapy.

Intracerebral hemorrhage and thrombin-induced alterations in cerebral microvessel matrix

Four phase III clinical trials of oral direct factor Xa or thrombin inhibitors demonstrated significantly lower intracranial hemorrhage compared to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular-atrial fibrillation. This is counter-intuitive to the principle that inhibiting thrombosis should increase hemorrhagic risk. We tested the novel hypothesis that anti-thrombin activity decreases the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage by directly inhibiting thrombin-mediated degradation of cerebral microvessel basal lamina matrix, responsible for preventing hemorrhage. Collagen IV, laminin, and perlecan each contain one or more copies of the unique α-thrombin cleavage site consensus sequence. In blinded controlled experiments, α-thrombin significantly degraded each matrix protein in vitro and in vivo in a concentration-dependent fashion. In vivo stereotaxic injection of α-thrombin significantly increased permeability, local IgG extravasation, and hemoglobin (Hgb) deposition together with microvessel matrix degradation in a mouse model. In all formats the direct anti-thrombin dabigatran completely inhibited matrix degradation by α-thrombin. Fourteen-day oral exposure to dabigatran etexilate-containing chow completely inhibited matrix degradation, the permeability to large molecules, and cerebral hemorrhage associated with α-thrombin. These experiments demonstrate that thrombin can degrade microvessel matrix, leading to hemorrhage, and that inhibition of microvessel matrix degradation by α-thrombin decreases cerebral hemorrhage. Implications for focal ischemia and other conditions are discussed.

Pharmacological Difference Between Platelet Aggregations in Cardioembolic Stroke Patients with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Pilot Study

Background Selecting the appropriate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for embolic ischemic stroke patients, especially on concurrent antiplatelet therapy, is important. However, a limited number of studies have reported on the pharmacological differences in platelet aggregation of each DOAC. We aimed to evaluate the antiplatelet effects of selected DOACs, by comparing dabigatran (a direct oral thrombin inhibitor) and factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors (apixaban and rivaroxaban) in patients who had suffered a cardioembolic stroke.Methods We retrospectively evaluated 12 patients diagnosed with a cardioembolic stroke who took any DOAC without an antiplatelet drug and underwent platelet aggregation tests within 60 days from the onset of symptoms. The platelet aggregation tests were analyzed by both light transmission aggregometry and VerifyNow®.Results Six patients (50%) took dabigatran, while the other six (50%) took an FXa inhibitor (n = 4 for apixaban and n = 2 for rivaroxaban). From the light transmission aggregometry analysis, it was found that the maximal extent of aggregation for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was significantly higher with dabigatran than with FXa inhibitors, and the ED50 value of ADP on platelet aggregation was significantly lower with dabigatran than with FXa inhibitors. Moreover, the VerifyNow® analyses revealed that P2Y12 reaction units were significantly higher with dabigatran than with FXa inhibitors.Conclusions Dabigatran had little impact on platelet aggregation compared to FXa inhibitors in patients who had suffered a cardioembolic stroke with atrial fibrillation, and who took DOACs for secondary prevention within 60 days from the onset.

DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the formation of blood clots in deep veins, commonly the leg veins and the pelvic veins. DVT is a potentially fatal condition leading to increased mortality and morbidity if not diagnosed and treated promptly.Incidence is more prevalent in 60- 65 years of age because of increased pro-coagulant factors like factor VIII, factor VII, homocysteine, brinogen. With the increase in age the risk of DVT development increases exponentially.All bed ridden patients should receive sequential compression device therapy as primary DVT prophylaxis in the form of intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPCDs), graduated compression stocking (GCS), and the venous foot pump.The pharmacological agents used in the prophylaxis of DVT include low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), fondaparinux, Unfractionated heparin (UFH), new oral direct selective thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors.The complications of DVT include development of Pulmonary embolism (PE) , Paradoxical emboli, Recurrent DVT, Post thrombotic syndrome. Approximately 4% individuals treated for DVT develop PE. It accounts for 10-12% mortality rate in hospitalized patients.The prevention and treatment must be upgraded continuously with evidence base strategies. This article aims at reviewing the clinical presentation, diagnostic and treatment modalities of DVT

Post‐thrombotic syndrome in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with dabigatran or warfarin: A long‐term cross‐sectional follow‐up of RE‐COVER study patients

BackgroundStudies suggest that the direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban compared to warfarin reduces the risk of post‐thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but this has not been evaluated for oral direct thrombin inhibitors. ObjectivesTo compare the long‐term prevalence of PTS, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with acute DVT and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), randomized to treatment with dabigatran or warfarin in the phase III RE‐COVER studies. MethodsWe conducted a cross‐sectional follow‐up study of patients randomized in Canada, Norway, and Sweden. PTS was assessed by the patient‐reported Villalta scale (PRV) and HRQoL by EQ‐5D and VEINES‐QOL/Sym. ResultsWe included 349 patients between December 2015 and November 2018; 166 were treated with dabigatran and 183 with warfarin. DVT (+/− PE) was index event in 255 patients, whereas 94 patients had PE only. Mean time from index event was 8.7 (standard deviation 1.4) years. PTS was diagnosed in 63% of patients with DVT and in 46% of patients with PE only, and did not differ between the treatment groups; the crude odds ratio (OR) for PTS in patients treated with dabigatran compared with warfarin was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6–1.8) after DVT and 1.2 (95% CI 0.5–2.6) after PE only. The prevalence of recurrent VTE was 21% in both treatment groups. HRQoL scores did not differ between groups. ConclusionIn this long‐term cross‐sectional study, the prevalence of PTS, recurrent VTE, and HRQoL were similar in patients treated with dabigatran and warfarin.

The impact of oral direct thrombin inhibitors on activated clotting time during catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) unlike factor Xa-inhibitors (Xa-inhibitors) is associated with fewer bleeding complications than warfarin in patients who had catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the mechanisms remains unclear, and activated clotting time (ACT) is used to control heparin-dose for thromboembolic prevention during CA. Methods: We retrospectively studied 543 patients taking direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) who underwent CA for AF (375 males, age 67 ± 10, 251 non-paroxysmal AF, 142 DTIs). Patients with off-label usage of DOAC were excluded. ACT was measured before (Pre-ACT) and after (post-ACT) initial heparin administration (3000U + 100U/kg), and total heparin-dose was evaluated. Results: Pre-ACT and post-ACT were extended in patients with DTIs (150 ± 21 vs 123 ± 15; P &amp;lt; 0.0001 and 322 ± 39 vs 309 ± 42 sec; P = 0.0013). Patients with Xa-inhibitors required higher total heparin-dose (199 ± 43 vs 175 ± 34 U/kg; P &amp;lt; 0.0001). During and after CA, none had thromboembolic events and 14 patients (3 DTIs, 11 Xa-inhibitor) showed bleeding events (Figure). Conclusions: ACT is extended in patients taking DTIs. Xa-inhibitors might have anticoagulant effects which are not reflected in ACT. Abstract Figure.

Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation support for age‐ and weight‐adjusted dosing of dabigatran etexilate in children with venous thromboembolism

BackgroundDabigatran etexilate (DE), a direct oral thrombin inhibitor, has been evaluated in children with venous thromboembolism (VTE) using oral solution, pellets, or capsules. ObjectivesThis study evaluated DE pharmacokinetics (PK) in children with VTE and the appropriateness of a DE pediatric age‐ and weight‐based dosing algorithm. Patients/MethodsA population PK model was fitted to data from four single‐arm and one randomized, comparative pediatric VTE studies (358 children aged birth to <18 years; 2748 PK observations) and one healthy‐adult study (32 males aged <40 years; 1523 PK observations) using nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling. A stepwise, covariate, model‐building procedure evaluated the influence of covariates (e.g., age, body weight, body surface area [BSA]‐normalized renal function, and sex). The final model was used to evaluate the pediatric dosing algorithm, with simulations comparing pediatric trough exposure with reference exposure defined for the pediatric studies. ResultsThe population PK of dabigatran was adequately described by a two‐compartment model with first‐order elimination and absorption. Age, weight, BSA‐normalized renal function, and sex were statistically significant covariates (all P < .05). Apparent clearance increased with age (independently of body weight), diminished with decreasing BSA‐normalized renal function, and was lower in females than males. All disposition parameters increased with body weight escalation (allometric scaling). Simulations confirmed that for all DE formulations, the final pediatric dosing algorithms achieved reference exposure without dose adjustment. ConclusionsUsing a population PK model of DE for children with VTE, simulations showed that the final dosing algorithms were appropriate for all DE formulations; no dose titration was needed.

Microembolic signal detection in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulant

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-known risk factor for embolic stroke. The incidence of stroke in patients with AF is 4.5% per year. In 93% of cases, strokes in patients with AF are of embolic origin. Trans Cranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring of silent micro-embolic signals (MES) can represent an effective preclinical tool for verifying the efficacy of embolic events in patients treated with antithrombotic prophylaxis (antiplatelet agents, Vitamin K inhibitors, and new oral anticoagulants direct thrombin inhibitors). METHODS: We enrolled 16 patients, of both sexes equally distributed (M = 8 plus F = 8) with a known diagnosis of AF with Ejection Fraction greater of 40%, all in anticoagulant treatment by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and we assessed, through the use of a portable TCD-X, the MES signals during physical activity of 1 h. The aim was of evaluating whether the physical activity of a subject affected by AF worsens the incidence of MES in these subjects. Result: 25% of patients presented a MES at the time of registration. Two female of 38 and 75 year-old; and two male of 70 and 71 year-old. The 75-year-old woman reported an episode of instability while walking; therefore it was increased her anticoagulant treatment. Men did not perceive the MES. CONCLUSION: Both sexes reported the presence of MES equally with a prevalence of 25%. By correlating these results with those of the literature, it is deduced that physical activity is, therefore, not a risk factor for these patients being treated with DOACs. The TDC-X registration implemented is relatively short compared to the current potential of the device which is over 6 h; therefore, it is desirable that further studies be performed in future on statistically adequate sample cohorts and simultaneous bilateral recordings of MES.

Heavy menstrual bleeding on direct factor Xa inhibitors: Rationale and design of the MEDEA study

BackgroundIn premenopausal women, treatment with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors is associated with an increased risk of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Treatment with the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran appears to be associated with a reduced risk of HMB compared with VKA. These findings come from small observational studies or post hoc analyses of trials in which HMB was not a primary outcome. Use of tranexamic acid during the menstrual period may be effective in patients with HMB, but prospective data regarding efficacy and safety in patients on anticoagulant treatment are lacking. Rationale and DesignA direct comparison of a factor Xa inhibitor and a thrombin inhibitor with HMB as primary outcome, as well as an evaluation of the effects of adding tranexamic acid in women with anticoagulant‐associated HMB is highly relevant for clinical practice. The MEDEA study is a randomized, open‐label, pragmatic clinical trial to evaluate management strategies in premenopausal women with HMB associated with factor Xa inhibitor therapy. OutcomesWomen using factor Xa inhibitors with proven HMB, as assessed by a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score of >150, will be randomized to one of three study arms: (i) switch to dabigatran; (ii) continue factor Xa inhibitor with addition of tranexamic acid during the menstrual period; or (iii) continue factor Xa inhibitor without intervention. The primary outcome is the difference in PBAC score before and after randomization. Here, we present the rationale and highlight several unique features in the design of the study.

Use of Direct Oral Thrombin Inhibitors for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis

Use of Direct Oral Thrombin Inhibitors for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis