Option For Multiple Myeloma Research Articles

The potential role of CAR-T in Multiple Myeloma Treatment. A review

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy, which causes accumulation of plasma cells in the bone marrow. The symptoms of MM are associated with organ dysfunction and include hypercalcemia, renal failure, anaemia and bone destruction. A relatively new and promising therapeutic option for MM is CAR-T therapy. Aim of the study: The study aimed to outline the role of CAR-T therapy in MM treatment.Material and methods: We conducted a literature review containing 24 articles. We described the role of CAR-T in MM therapy, its therapeutic points, the effectiveness of therapy, and its side effects.Results: CAR-T cells transduced with CAR can recognize specific antigens and kill the cancer cells. For MM these specific antigens are integrin β7, SLAMF7, CD138, BCMA, GPRC5D and FCRL5. Integrin β7 in its active form, can be found in MM cells, whereas in other blood cells, integrin β7 is in the inactive form. The expression of SLAMF7 on MM cells is high and uniform, but its function is not clear: expression of SLAMF7 in MM is suspected to increase the survival and adhesion of MM cells to bone marrow stromal cells. CD138's strong expression on MM cells is contributing to their development and proliferation. BCMA expression was not detected in other human tissues, only in MM cells. GPRC5D is highly expressed in bone marrow samples from MM patients, and minimally expressed in other hematologic malignancies. FCRL5 is a protein marker found specifically on plasma cells in MM, its increased expression promotes B cell proliferation. The AlloCAR-T therapy also seems to be an effective method.CAR-T therapy has also adverse effects including cytokine release syndrome, neurological toxicity, haematological disorders and infusion fever. Conclusions: The effects of CAR-T therapy in MM are really promising and give real benefits to patients. For this reason, it should be further developed and subjected to further research.

Ultradiluted Homeopathic Medicines Cause Apoptosis in RPMI-8226 Multiple Myeloma Cells in vitro: a Pilot Study.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common type of cancer among hematological malignancies and is difficult to treat. Although controversial in nature, homeopathy's effects have been tested on a wide range of cancer cell types in vitro, as well as clinically. However, homeopathic medicines have yet to be tested in MM cells. In this preliminary study, we investigated the effects of Arsenicum album, Hecla lava, Carcinosinum and Carboneum sulphuratum 200C on a human MM cell line. The RPMI-8226 MM cell line was cultured in vitro for up to 96 hours and treated with each of four homeopathic preparations. The spectrophotometric 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, flow cytometric Annexin V-PE/7-actinomycin D (7-AAD) and propidium iodide (PI) staining were each used to examine cell viability, apoptosis and cell cycle, respectively. The MTT assay showed that all four homeopathic preparations reduced cell viability over time when compared to the control group cells, especially at 72 and 96 hours whereby only 50% of cells remained viable. Similarly, after 96 hours of treatment, the proportion of viable cells was significantly decreased and the proportion of early apoptotic (Annexin-V-PE +/7AAD-) cells was significantly increased for all four homeopathic preparations. Based on the PI-staining cell cycle data, cells treated with Hecla lava and Carboneum sulphuratum showed a statistically significant accumulation in the sub-G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle (p < 0.05). This is the first study to demonstrate that each of four homeopathic medicines causes apoptosis in a MM cell line. Further exploration of the potential of Arsenicum album, Hecla lava, Carcinosinum and Carboneum sulphuratum as a complementary therapeutic option in MM is warranted.

Has the Survival in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Changed with the Advent of Latest Treatments?

Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy of plasma cells. Over the last couple of decades, there have been groundbreaking advances in its treatment, emergence of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies and bispecific antibodies (bsAbs). As per National Comprehensive Cancer Network's (NCCN) current guidelines, the current standard of treatment is a 3-drug regimen bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone. The year 2003, marked the beginning of the revolution in the MM biological treatment. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the trends of multiple myeloma, particularly to assess the difference in survival, with the innovation in its novel treatment options. Methods: The data was collected from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result database Research. We extracted Multiple Myeloma cases diagnosed between 01-85+ years of age, using Incidence- SEER Research Date 17 Registries, Nov 2022 Sub (2000-2020), with ICD 0-3 Hist/behavior, malignant, code 9732/3 for plasma cell myeloma. The analysis was stratified based on age, sex, race, &amp; survival curves based were compared, using the Log-rank test (GraphPad Prism). Results: A total of 109222 cases of multiple myeloma were identified between 2000-2020. Of these, ~55.18% were males and ~44.81% were females. Median age at the time of diagnosis is 69 years. The incidence rate overall has been increasing and was noted to be 62.38 per 1,000,000 population vs 56.38 in the year 2000. When stratified further on gender, incidence rates for males were noted to be up-trending from 69.32 in 2000 to 75.87 in the year 2020. Whereas for females the incidence rates in females in 2000 was at 47.02 and at 51.51 in 2020. The survival was compared for the general population before and after the emergence of newer treatment in the year 2003. There was a statistical difference found in the median of survival (mOS) before the introduction of the biologicals in 2003, was 25 months, and after the year 2003, was 46 months (P Value &amp;lt;0.0001, Hazard Ratio 1.451 95% Confidence Interval 1.421 to 1.481). Conclusion: Multiple Myeloma is a relatively rare malignancy, with a slightly stronger male predilection. Its overall incidence has been noted to be up-trending within the last 20 years, in the United States. The median age for diagnosis is 69 years. In the year 2003, FDA approved Bortezomib for the treatment of MM, which primarily targeted the proteasome and the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). This established the role of UPS in MM, and further led to the invention of newer biological treatment options for MM. When survival months were compared in the pre-and-post biological treatment era, it was noted that the mOS was only 25 months, whereas a significant increase in mOS to 46 months was noted, after the introduction of biological therapy in 2003. With newer groundbreaking research and approval of CAR-T therapies, we are on our way to making MM, a curable malignancy.

Clinical and Diagnostic Challenges in Patients with Concomitant Plasma Cell Disorders and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a plasma cell precursor disease that regularly precedes the development of multiple myeloma (MM). It accounts for about 4.5% in the entire population, however patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) seem at a higher risk for MGUS with a reported rate of concomitant disease at 3-14%. The reason for this co-occurrence of MGUS and MPN remains unclear, and a common cell of origin has not yet been defined. Inversely, constant MPN-driven inflammation in the bone marrow microenvironment (BM) may stimulate the expansion of a pre-existing plasma cell clone thereby promoting the transition from MGUS to active MM. Here, we investigated the clinical and molecular characteristics of a comprehensive series of cases treated for MGUS/MPN overlap at our center. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with concomitant MGUS/MM and MPN between 2006 and 2023 were identified by retrospective chart review, yielding a total of 13 cases. Results: We identified 5/13 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MGUS and 8/13 cases with active MM, all coinciding with a diagnosis of MPN (5 polycythemia vera (PV), 4 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMol), 3 primary myelofibrosis (PMF), 1 chronic myelogeneous leukemia (CML)). Median age at diagnosis was 66 (range 44-78) years for MGUS/MM and 64 (range 43-81) years for MPN. Overall survival in our cohort was rather short at a median of 8.2 (range 0-16) years. For clinical management, anti-MM therapy was prioritized over MPN treatment in the majority of patients, with the exception of CMMol. MPN-related organ restrictions significantly limited treatment options for MM, including bleeding disorders, infectious complications and impaired hematopoiesis (in PMF). High-dose concepts were performed in transplant-eligible cases, including autologous in 4 and allogenic stem cell transplantation in 2 patients. Two out of 6 patients died under transplant (1 autologous graft failure), indicating a comparably high transplant-related mortality. Another patient died from MM progression as PMF-induced anemia did not allow for more intense treatment. To examine the evolutionary path from MGUS to MM and the potential impact on this transformation by a concomitant MPN, we next examined the clinical course of disease in each patient. Six out of 13 patients had secondary MPN after prior MGUS/MM diagnosis, 5/13 patients were diagnosed with MPN first, and for 2/13 cases BM assessment revealed coincidental findings of MPN/ MM at the same time. For the cases of secondary MPN after initial diagnosis of MM/MGUS, latency between both diseases was shorter, than vice versa (40.2 vs. 73.6 months, P=0.19). No association was observed between secondary MPN and prior treatment for MM, as only 1/6 patients was diagnosed with PV following high-dose melphalan chemotherapy, potentially pointing towards a negligible role of treatment-induced secondary primary malignancies the context of MM/MPN overlap. In contrast, MGUS progression to active MM was observed in 1 patient with hyperdiploid IgG kappa MM (including trisomy 9) and long-term coexistent JAK2-mutated PV. Another patient was diagnosed with IgG kappa MM and 9p gain along with concomitant JAK2-mutated PMF. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is currently ongoing for these patients to decipher the temporal relationship of MM/MGUS and JAK2-mutated MPN. Conclusions: The prevalence of MGUS/MM in MPN patients seems modestly increased as compared to the entire population. From a clinical viewpoint, overlap of both diseases poses significant challenges to healthcare providers as treatment-related mortality tends to be higher than in patients with mutually exclusive MPN/ MM. Improved understanding of the molecular interplay of both diseases will inform risk-adjusted treatment decisions and will lead to improved outcomes in this highly challenging subgroup of patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with and without t(11;14)

Background: The BCL2 inhibitor Venetoclax (Ven) is an effective treatment option in multiple myeloma (MM). However, despite the recent inclusion in European MM treatment guidelines, no approval has yet been granted for the treatment of MM and the optimal dosage, combination partners and timing of treatment remain under investigation. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 40 MM patients treated with Ven at our institution from November 2017 until June 2022. 64% of them had a t(11;14), all were heavily pretreated with a median of 7 lines of prior lines of therapy, and 75% were penta-refractory. High-risk features were enriched in the cohort (47% for all 38 with FISH available via IMWG criteria). Risk was evenly distributed between patients with and without t(11;14). Patients received either Ven alone or in combination with other MM drugs over a median of 5 cycles. Results: The full cohort overall response rate reached 53%, ten patients (25%) achieved partial remission (PR), seven patients (17.5%) went into VGPR and four patients (10%) had a complete remission (CR). Moreover, stable disease (SD) for three months or longer was achieved in seven patients (18%). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months and the duration of response reached 9.6 months. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients harboring t(11;14) had significantly increased PFS and OS: Median PFS reached 11.2 vs. 4.4 months and median OS was not reached vs. 12.8 months, respectively. Overall, hematological AEs grade 3 or higher were documented in 65% of patients and three high-grade infectious complications (7.5%) occurred. Two of these patients died from sepsis, another recovered from pneumonia with severe sequelae. Interestingly, in contradiction to the BELLINI experience, all high-grade infectious complications occurred in the t(11;14) positive cohort. Conclusion: In our real-world analysis, Ven demonstrated to be an effective MM treatment option for t(11;14) positive relapsed/refractory MM. However, the significant infectious complications suggest antibiotic prophylaxis and careful monitoring of patients undergoing Ven treatment.

Results of an Open-Label Phase 1 Study Repurposing Oral Metformin and Nelfinavir in Combination with Subcutaneous Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Background: GLUT4 inhibition via the use of a protease inhibitor, such as nelfinavir (NEL), is an attractive therapeutic option in multiple myeloma (MM), given the dependence of MM cells on glucose. Furthermore, combining a GLUT4 inhibitor with an oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor, such as metformin (MET), may counter the possibility of therapeutic resistance to GLUT4 inhibition in MM cells, showing synergistic promise (Dalva-Aydemir et al., Clin Can Res 2015). In addition to GLUT4 inhibition, NEL also lowers the cytotoxicity resistance of MM cells against proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib (BOR) (Driessen et al., Blood 2018). Thus, this study evaluated the safety and tolerability of repurposing MET and NEL, in combination with BOR for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) that had progressed on all standard of care (SOC) therapies. Methods: This trial utilized a 3+3 dose escalation design with 3 dose levels planned for up to a maximum of six (21-day) cycles. MET was administered for 14/21 days and started at a dose of 500 mg BID with plans to be investigated at a maximum dose of 1000 mg BID. NEL was administered for 14/21 days and started at a dose of 1250 mg BID with plans to be investigated to a maximum dose of 2500 mg BID. SubQ BOR was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle at a dose of 1.3 mg/m 2 to a portion of patients. Patients with RRMM were required to have had 2 prior lines of therapy and prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulators (IMiDs), and Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. The primary objective was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination. The secondary objective was to evaluate the safety as well as the overall response rate (ORR) of this combination. This trial was funded by the Helen Diller Family Foundation. Results: From 4/2019 until 9/2022, nine patients were accrued with a median age of 65 (range: 42-81) that received a median of 7 prior lines of therapy (Range: 6-13). All but one patient had a prior autologous stem cell transplant. Only one patient was not triple-class refractory, and 2/3 rd (n = 6) also had prior anti-BCMA therapy. The first three patients received only MET (500 mg BID) and NEL (1250 mg BID) at the first dose level for up to one cycle before experiencing progressive disease and coming off the study. Given the limited activity of MET and NEL in the initial treatment of these three patients, two subsequent amendments to the protocol allowed for the upfront addition of BOR 1.3 mg/m2 to the original combination, as well as shortened the DLT evaluation period from two cycles to just one. Thus, the following six patients received MET (500 mg BID) and NEL (1250 mg BID) at the first dose level in addition to weekly BOR at 1.3 mg/m2. Four (44%) patients experienced grade 3+ hematological AEs and six (67%) experienced grade 3+ non-hematological AEs. The most common hematologic grade 3+ AE observed was anemia (44%). The nonhematologic grade 3+ AEs observed were dyspnea, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting (11% each). None of the AEs were possibly related to treatment, suggesting good overall safety of the combination. While eight of nine patients have since died of progressive disease, no deaths were attributable to the treatment. All six patients who received BOR upfront with MET and NEL were previously refractory to BOR in prior lines of therapy; however, none had received BOR as their last line of therapy prior to accrual to this study. Four of these six patients had progressive disease after one cycle of therapy and went off study. However, the remaining two were able to receive 2 or more cycles of therapy, with one experiencing an unconfirmed minor response (MR) in the first cycle and the other experiencing stable disease (SD) for all six cycles. The patient who experienced SD was safely able to transition to a subsequent clinical trial utilizing an anti-BCMA bispecific antibody therapy and remains alive at the time of this analysis. The study was closed before accrual to the next dose level was started. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this repurposed drug combination in this very difficult-to-treat population of RRMM. While no ORR was observed, identification of biomarkers used for selection of patients with no other SOC options who could experience at least SD responses may be beneficial in allowing this combination to slow or stabilize the disease progression until other novel therapies or clinical trials are available.

CD38-targeted and erythrocyte membrane camouflaged nanodrug delivery system for photothermal and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant and incurable disease. Chemotherapy is currently the primary treatment option for MM. However, chemotherapeutic drugs can interrupt treatment because of serious side effects. Therefore, development of novel therapeutics for MM is essential. In this study, we designed and constructed an innovative nanoparticle-based drug delivery system, P-R@Ni3P-BTZ, and investigated its feasibility, effectiveness, and safety both in vitro and in vivo. P-R@Ni3P-BTZ is a nanocomposite that consists of two parts: (1) the drug carrier (Ni3P), which integrates photothermal therapy (PTT) with chemotherapy by loading bortezomib (BTZ); and (2) the shell (P-R), a CD38 targeting peptide P-modified red blood cell membrane nanovesicles. In vitro and in vivo, it was proven that P-R@Ni3P-BTZ exhibits remarkable antitumor effects by actively targeting CD38 + MM cells. P-R@Ni3P-BTZ significantly induces the accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increases the apoptosis of MM cells, which underlies the primary mechanism of its antitumor effects. In addition, P-R@Ni3P exhibits good biocompatibility and biosafety, both in vitro and in vivo. Overall, P-R@Ni3P-BTZ is a specific and efficient MM therapeutic method.

Identification of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Biomarkers in Multiple Myeloma through cfDNA-Based Liquid Biopsy Using tchDNA-Seq.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of pathogenic CD138+ plasma cells (PPCs) in bone marrow (BM). Recent years have seen a significant increase in the treatment options for MM; however, most patients who achieve complete the response ultimately relapse. The earlier detection of tumor-related clonal DNA would thus be very beneficial for patients with MM and would enable timely therapeutic interventions to improve outcomes. Liquid biopsy of "cell-free DNA" (cfDNA) as a minimally invasive approach might be more effective than BM aspiration not only for the diagnosis but also for the detection of early recurrence. Most studies thus far have addressed the comparative quantification of patient-specific biomarkers in cfDNA with PPCs and BM samples, which have shown good correlations. However, there are limitations to this approach, such as the difficulty in obtaining enough circulating free tumor DNA to achieve sufficient sensitivity for the assessment of minimal residual disease. Herein, we summarize current data on methodologies to characterize MM, and we present evidence that targeted capture hybridization DNA sequencing (tchDNA-Seq) can provide robust biomarkers in cfDNA, including immunoglobulin (IG) rearrangements. We also show that detection can be improved by prior purification of the cfDNA. Overall, liquid biopsies of cfDNA to monitor IG rearrangements have the potential to provide important diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information in patients with MM.

Real-world study of the efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma based on data from the nominative ATU in France: IFM 2020-04 study.

Belantamab mafodotin (BM) is an anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate (GSK2857916) that represents an alternative option in multiple myeloma. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety in real-world of BM in patients who benefited from an early access program. We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicenter study. Eligibility criteria were treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in monotherapy in adult patients who have received at least 3 lines of therapy previously, including at least one immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and whose disease progressed during the last treatment period. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the overall survival (OS). The trial was sponsored by the French group IFM and supported by GSK. Between November 2019 and December 2020, 106 patients were treated with BM; 97 were eligible for the efficacy evaluation and 104 for safety. The median age was 66 (range: 37-82) years. High risk cytogenetics were identified in 40.9% of patients. Fifty-five (56.7%) patients were triple-class refractory and 11 (11.3%) were penta-class refractory. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 5 (range: 3-12). The median number of BM cycles administered was 3 (range: 1-22). The overall response rate at best response was 38.1% (37/97). The median OS was 9.3 months (95%CI: 5.9; 15.3), and median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95%CI: 1.9; 4.7). The median duration of response was 9 months (range 4.65-10.4). Treatment was delayed for 55 (52.9%) patients including 36.5% for treatment-related toxicity. Ophthalmic adverse events, mainly grade ≤2, were the most common toxicity (48%). The occurrence of keratopathy was 37.5%. Overall, our data are concordant with the results from DREAMM-2 in terms of efficacy and safety on a non-biased population.

Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: Opportunities to Enhance Efficacy and Improve Safety.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological neoplasm of adults in the Western world. Overall survival has doubled since the advent of proteosome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies. However, patients with adverse cytogenetics or high-risk disease as determined by the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) continue to have poorer outcomes, and triple-refractory patients have a median survival of less than 1 year. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) commonly bind to a tumour epitope along with CD3 on T-cells, leading to T-cell activation and tumour cell killing. These treatments show great promise in MM patients, with the first agent, teclistamab, receiving regulatory approval in 2022. Their potential utility is hampered by the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), a hallmark of MM, which may limit efficacy, and by undesirable adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and infections, some of which may be fatal. In this review, we first consider the means of enhancing the efficacy of BsAbs in MM. These include combining BsAbs with other drugs that ameliorate the effect of the immunosuppressive TME, improving target availability, the use of BsAbs directed against multiple target antigens, and the optimal time in the treatment pathway to employ BsAbs. We then discuss methods to improve safety, focusing on reducing infection rates associated with treatment-induced hypogammaglobulinaemia, and decreasing the frequency and severity of CRS. BsAbs offer a highly-active therapeutic option in MM. Improving the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents may enable more patients to benefit from these novel therapies and improve outcomes for patients with high-risk disease.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder that remains incurable for most patients, as persistent clonal evolution drives new mutations which confer MM high-risk signatures and resistance to standard care. The past two decades have significantly refashioned the therapeutic options for MM, especially adoptive T cell therapy contributing to impressive response rate and clinical efficacy. Despite great promises achieved from chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, the poor durability and severe toxicity (cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity) are still huge challenges. Therefore, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), characterized by the nature of clinicopathologic and molecular heterogeneity, is frequently associated with poor prognosis. B Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) is the most successful target for CAR-T therapy, and other potential targets either for single-target or dual-target CAR-T are actively being studied in numerous clinical trials. Moreover, mechanisms driving resistance or relapse after CAR-T therapy remain uncharacterized, which might refer to T-cell clearance, antigen escape, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Engineering CAR T-cell to improve both efficacy and safety continues to be a promising area for investigation. In this review, we aim to describe novel tumor-associated neoantigens for MM, summarize the data from current MM CAR-T clinical trials, introduce the mechanism of disease resistance/relapse after CAR-T infusion, highlight innovations capable of enhanced efficacy and reduced toxicity, and provide potential directions to optimize manufacturing processes.

Targeting the Isoprenoid Biosynthetic Pathway in Multiple Myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy for which there is currently no cure. While treatment options for MM have expanded over the last two decades, all patients will eventually become resistant to current therapies. Thus, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies to treat MM. The isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway (IBP) is responsible for the post-translational modification of proteins belonging to the Ras small GTPase superfamily, such as Ras, Rho and Rab family members. Given the important roles these GTPase proteins play in various cellular processes, there is significant interest in the development of inhibitors that disturb their prenylation and consequently their activity in MM cells. Numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated that IBP inhibitors have anti-MM effects, including the induction of apoptosis in MM cells and inhibition of osteoclast activity. Some IBP inhibitors have made their way into the clinic. For instance, nitrogenous bisphosphonates are routinely prescribed for the management MM bone disease. Other IBP inhibitors, including statins and farnesyltransferase inhibitors, have been evaluated in clinical trials for MM, while there is substantial preclinical investigation into geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase inhibitors. Here we discuss recent advances in the development of IBP inhibitors, assess their mechanism of action and evaluate their potential as anti-MM agents.

The Landscape of Maintenance Therapy Trials Following Autologous Transplant for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND: The current standard for maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is lenalidomide, an oral treatment with demonstrated overall survival benefit. Other options for MM may incur toxicities or require frequent visits to infusion centers and may thus not be best suited as maintenance. Patients with high-risk cytogenetic features have poorer outcomes than those considered to have standard risk disease, and national guidelines recommend doublet maintenance (with a proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide in this setting). Currently, the role of minimal residual disease (MRD) in treatment decision making is unknown but MRD status in this setting may dictate treatment discontinuation in the future. We conducted a review of currently enrolling clinical trials to characterize therapeutic agents/strategies being used or evaluated in a maintenance setting, outcomes evaluated, the inclusion of high-risk patients, and the use of MRD response in guiding management decisions. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed on the clinicaltrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu, and anzctr.org.au databases on March 2, 2022, using the keywords "newly diagnosed multiple myeloma", "transplant eligible multiple myeloma", and "maintenance in multiple myeloma". Only studies that were currently recruiting patients, or those listed as active but not yet recruiting were included. Studies that completed enrollment, were terminated, or had been presented or published were not included. Studies were included if patients were planned to undergo autologous stem cell transplant after induction therapy followed by maintenance strategy. If at least one arm received post-transplant maintenance therapy, and the maintenance therapy was specified in the trial description, it was included. Trials evaluating maintenance therapy after a salvage transplant or maintenance therapy in non-transplant settings were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were analyzed. Table 1 highlights characteristics. Of the 20 studies, 11 (55.0%) were randomized and 9 (45.0%) were non-randomized. Six studies (30.0%) evaluated PFS as a primary outcome, and 2 studies (10.0%) included OS as a primary outcome. Four of the 20 (20.0%) studies included multiple primary endpoints in addition to time to event outcome, while 4 (20.0%) had a time to event outcome as the sole primary outcome being investigated. Of the 11 randomized studies, 2 studies evaluated OS (18.1%) and 5 evaluated PFS (45.5%) as primary endpoint. MRD negativity was included as a primary endpoint in 11 studies (55.0%) and a secondary endpoint in seven (35%). Of the 9 nonrandomized studies, 4 had a primary endpoint of MRD negativity rate (44.4%), 2 (22.2%) had response-based primary outcomes, and one (11.1%) had a time to event primary outcome. Of the total trials, two (10.0%) assessed or mandated discontinuation of maintenance therapy for those achieving MRD negativity. Table 2 describes maintenance regimens utilized. A total of 4 randomized studies assessed comparison of lenalidomide and another agent to lenalidomide alone with a primary endpoint powered for PFS/OS. Only one study limited enrollment to standard risk disease. No studies enrolled only "high-risk" disease. Amongst a total of 19 trials enrolling patients with high-risk disease, eight trials (42.1%) were offering or permitting patients with high-risk disease to receive single agent lenalidomide. CONCLUSION: Our study analyzing the landscape of current maintenance trials demonstrates that there are many promising clinical trial designs that adapt treatment based on the depth of responses and incorporate newer agents with enough statistical power to demonstrate OS advantage. However, there remains room for improvement, as evidenced by trials evaluating drugs with marked toxicity profiles in non-randomized single arm settings, patients with high-risk disease being permitted to receive treatment that may be inferior to what current guidelines recommend, and a lack of patient centered endpoints (such as OS or quality of life) being evaluated as primary endpoints. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Patients' and Caregivers' Perspectives from Social Media Towards Disease Burden and Innovative Treatment Options in Multiple Myeloma

Introduction: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often suffer from disease progression through multiple failed regimens from the same classes, prompting the development of new therapies with novel mechanisms of action. With the expansion of MM therapies, optimizing patient benefit requires understanding their experiences, needs, and expectations. Data on patient voice are often filtered by health care providers' (HCPs) and researchers' interpretations and confounded due to various limitations. In recent years, there have been enhancements to data sources (eg, social media data) and methodologies (eg, machine learning), which together facilitate the capture of patient voice to be deeper, more efficient, and more reliable. There is an opportunity to build on existing patient voice data by leveraging these advanced technologies. This study aims to capture patient- and caregiver-reported unmet needs, treatment experience, and perspectives towards novel MM therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, from social media. Methods: This is a retrospective, targeted analysis of social media posts from open social platforms and Inspire's closed online MM communities from May 2020 to June 2022. Open social platforms included Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, patient-focused forums, blogs, and any platform where patients and caregivers interact on patient-driven topics. Pre-identified key search terms and Boolean strings around MM and its treatments were used to identify original and unstructured data on relevant topics. Posts outside of the United States, not written in English, or with key terms indicating they were posted by an HCP were excluded. Posts were analyzed using a mixed methodology including natural language processing and linguistic analysis to uncover relevant insights. Themes were summarized, when indicated in the posts, for early-line (defined as recently diagnosed patients) and later-line (defined as experienced patients) MM. Results: A total of 18,636 posts, out of over 560,000 MM-related posts, met the study criteria; 3,394 (18.2%) were for early-line and 2,962 (15.9%) were for later-line MM, while the remaining did not specify. Across all posts, the top 3 discussed themes (not mutually exclusive) were burden of MM (40%), symptoms (34%), and disease progression (28%). Common topics included severe pain, psychological burden, exhausted or lack of treatment options, side effects, and financial concerns (costs of care and insurance coverage). The psychological burden for both early-line and later-line MM included depression, anxiety, and stress. Later-line posts additionally expressed feelings of anger towards suboptimal diagnosis (9%) and sadness towards death (22%). Among the financial burden-related posts, later-line posts were more likely to request support compared to early-line posts (100% vs 35%). Financial support requests for later-line MM included expenses for treatment (31%), living (31%), and post-hospitalization care (18%). Among treatment-related posts, early-line posts expressed fear related to relapse (68%) and starting treatment (32%), while later-line posts pertained to a need for advice and support (48%) and concerns about running out of treatment options (52%). Burden on caregivers included emotional burden regarding disease management, impact of MM on quality of life, and a need for more information on available treatment options. Across patients and caregivers, most CAR-T posts were related to neutral information sharing (93%), while posts including sentiment expressed hope (14%), excitement (14%), and some uncertainty (4%). No bispecific antibody-related patient and caregiver posts were captured, indicating a lack of awareness. Conclusions: This analysis of social media posts identified that the overarching needs for patients with MM and their caregivers involved new treatment options, financial support, and access to education materials. Addressing these unmet needs may help alleviate the anxiety, stress, and other burdens patients and caregivers experience when managing MM. While there is hope and excitement towards new therapies, there is a lack of awareness of specific investigational drugs. Overall, many rely on social media for medical information and advice, indicating opportunities for patient-centric education and support programs.

Discovery of the oncogenic MDM2, a direct binding target of berberine and a potential therapeutic, in multiple myeloma.

Recent studies have suggested the potency of berberine (BBR) for multiple cancer treatments, including multiple myeloma (MM). However, the direct target and underlying mechanism of BBR remain largely understood in MM. Here, we demonstrated that BBR inhibited cell proliferation and acted synergistically with bortezomib in MM.1S cells. BBR treatment induced MM cell cycle arrest by downregulating several cell cycle-related proteins. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) as a BBR-binding protein was identified by surface plasmon resonance image (SPRi) analysis and molecular docking. Overexpression of MDM2 is associated with MM progression and a poor prognosis. Knockdown MDM2 by siRNA transfection can repress MM malignant progression and attenuate the BBR sensitivity to MM.1S cells. BBR treatment induced the degradation of MDM2 through the ubiquitin-proteasome system and reactivated P53/P21 in MM cells. Overall, our data has illustrated that MDM2, as a binding protein of BBR for the first time, may serve as a potential therapeutic option for MM.

Measurable Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: How Deep Is Enough?

The introduction of new and more effective therapeutic options for Multiple Myeloma (MM) has significantly deepened and prolonged patients’ remission. As currently used treatment protocols induce high rates of complete responses, Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) assessment has become essential to enhance the evaluation of treatment efficacy. Detection of MRD has improved with the development of highly sensitive and standardized techniques such as Next Generation Flow or Next Generation Sequencing, complemented by functional imaging techniques. These advances offer a valuable opportunity to further optimize criteria of response to treatment. Currently, extensive data demonstrate that MRD status is a valuable prognostic factor of survival. Since MRD represents a real measurement of disease burden, its incorporation in clinical trials to guide treatment decisions will certainly translate into clinical benefits. Sustained MRD negativity can be used to consider optimal candidates for treatment discontinuation, whereas MRD positive high-risk patients may have access to novel immunotherapeutic strategies such as bispecific drugs or CAR T cell therapy. In this review, we describe the available techniques to detect MRD, address the current data regarding MRD as a surrogate endpoint within clinical trials, examine how MRD can be introduced into the clinical management of MM patients, and discuss the future of MRD monitoring.

Preliminary efficacy of optimal pharmacotherapy and patient views in multiple myeloma.

e20006 Background: As new agents are approved for multiple myeloma (MM) and existing drugs become generic, treatments that represent optimal use of healthcare funds need to be reassessed. A therapeutic review was initiated to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of treatments for newly diagnosed (NDMM) patients who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation and those who are relapsed and/or are refractory (RRMM). This abstract reports on the clinical efficacy of treatments for both populations along with patient experiences, expectations, and perspectives of treatment for MM. Methods: A systematic literature search of randomized controlled phase III trials (RCTs), published between January 1996 and April 2021, that met the eligibility criteria in either population were included. Two network meta-analyses (NMA), one per population, were conducted to compare the efficacy across treatments for the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS). PFS was defined as the time from randomization to either disease progression or death. A random-effects model was used in both populations to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for PFS. Myeloma Canada conducted seven surveys between January 2016 and May 2021 that addressed expectations when selecting a treatment option in MM. A literature search of qualitative studies published between January 2016 and May 2021 was conducted on patients’ perspectives and experiences on treatment decisions in MM. Results: There were 29 RCTs in each NMA with an overall low risk of bias. The NDMM NMA identified 11 regimens that had numerically lower hazards for PFS compared to lenalidomide + dexamethasone (Rd), with HRs ranging from 0.38 to 0.99. The RRMM network showed 15 regimens that had numerically lower hazards for PFS compared to Rd, with HRs ranging from 0.44 to 0.99. Due to the wide 95% CrIs, conclusions on differences in PFS for each population are limited. Myeloma Canada collated data from 2,297 survey respondents. Ten qualitative studies of low to moderate quality were included. The survey data and qualitative studies found that choosing a treatment must involve a holistic approach beyond the efficacy of a therapy. Conclusions: The uncertainty in both NMAs limit firm conclusions on differences in PFS across treatment options in each population. Among the survey respondents, socioeconomic status was unclear which may influence patients’ expectations and preferences for treatment decisions in MM. Insufficient reporting in the qualitative studies makes it unclear how a patient’s treatment decisions changes over time. For Canadian payers to optimize the funding of treatment options available in MM, the results from the NMAs combined with Canadian real-world evidence will inform the development of an economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment sequences in NDMM.

Radotinib inhibits multiple myeloma cell proliferation via suppression of STAT3 signaling.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological cancer causing from accumulated abnormal plasma cells. STAT3 overexpression in MM appears to be mediated by a variety of factors, and it may be associated with an adverse prognosis and play a role in microenvironment-dependent treatment resistance. Unfortunately, MM remains an incurable disease, as relapse is very common. Therefore, there is urgent need to develop new treatment options for MM. Radotinib is a novel anti-cancer drug, currently approved in South Korea for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia patients. It is an oral, multitargeted inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases, including BCR-ABL, c-KIT, PDGFR, and Src family kinases. However, little is known about the effects of radotinib on multiple myeloma cells. However, little is known about the effects of radotinib on multiple myeloma cells. But even tinip almost not known about the impact of multiple myeloma cells. Moreover, nothing is known about how it affects STAT3 and JAK2. In this study, we analyzed the effect of radotinib on multiple myeloma cells. Herein, Moreover, nothing is known about how it. Moreover, not all is known about how the affects STAT3 and JAK2. We investigated the effect of radotinib on the STAT3 signaling pathway in MM cells, including several MM cell lines and mouse models. So we investigated the effect of radotinib on MM cells, including several MM cell lines and mouse models. Interestingly, radotinib induced apoptosis, and inhibited cell proliferation in MM cells including RPMI-8226, MM.1S, U266B1, and IM-9 cells. Moreover, radotinib treatment significantly increased the number Annexin V-positive cells and G0/G1-phase cells. In addition, radotinib treatment in various MM cells strongly suppressed the activity and expression of STAT3 and JAK2 proteins. We also observed that diverse proteins related to the STAT3 signaling pathway, including c-Myc, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1, cyclin D1 and cyclin D3, were powerfully inhibited by radotinib treatment in MM cells. Furthermore, radotinib significantly suppressed MM cell growth in a xenograft animal model using IM-9 cells. In conclusion, radotinib may play an important role as a candidate agent for MM treatment.

Immune-mediated neuropathy related to bortezomib in a patient with multiple myeloma

Treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) based on novel agents are often limited by dose-related neurotoxicity. Bortezomib, a highly active reversible proteasome inhibitor, frequently causes peripheral neuropathy (PN). Bortezomib-induced PN (BIPN) is characterized by a length-dependent, sensory, axonal polyneuropathy (PNP) with predominant small fiber-affection. Following dose reduction or drug discontinuation, BIPN resolves within 3-4 months in the majority of patients. The pathophysiological mechanisms of BIPN are unclear. Rare cases of a severe demyelinating or mixed BIPN with prominent motor involvement have been attributed to autoimmune or inflammatory reactions. A case report, including nerve pathology, is presented of a 59-year-old man with stage III IgG-κ MM who was treated with bortezomib on the occurrence of progressive disease. After the fourth cycle, he developed a painful distal symmetric sensory PNP followed by gait instability and muscle weakness increasing over 3 months despite early cessation of bortezomib. Neurological examination revealed a distal flaccid tetraparesis mainly of the lower limbs with sensory loss and severe ataxia, electrophysiological features of a mixed axonal-demyelinating PNP, and pathomorphological evidence of neuritis. Steroid treatment was initiated, and partial recovery of the neurological symptoms within 6 months was observed. While a neurotoxic effect may explain the initial distal sensory disturbances, the worsening of neurological dysfunction after bortezomib withdrawal and the clinical pattern with steroid-responsive muscle weakness predominantly of the legs are consistent with an immune-mediated mechanism. This is in line with the sural nerve biopsy findings. Toxic BIPN followed by an immune-mediated BIPN in the same patient has not been reported before.

Future therapeutic strategies for multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is still one of the most difficult hematological diseases. It is distinguished by recurrent relapses despite successful treatment. Proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory imide drugs, and monoclonal antibodies have all been developed in the last 10 years as treatment options for MM. However, obtaining a long-term treatment-free period for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains difficult. The most recent and intriguing research is on new BCMA-targeting therapies. CAR-T cell therapy, in particular, has shown promising results in the treatment for triple class refractory MM patients. BCMA CAR-T cell therapy is gaining attention as a potentially game-changing treatment for multiple myeloma. Fortunately, CAR-T cell therapy will be available in Japan in January 2022. However, numerous issues must be addressed. Many RRMM patients receive CAR-T cell therapy, for example, relapse, and progression-free survival are short. This section provides an overview of clinical study results for CAR-T cell therapy targeting BCMA, and the antibody-drug conjugate, bispecific antibodies, selinexor, and venetoclax.