Optimal Postoperative Pain Management Research Articles

Comparative Analysis of Oral Clonidine Versus Oral Gabapentin on Subarachnoid Block Duration and Postoperative Analgesic Needs.

Pain, an inherently subjective experience, plays a pivotal role in the body's defence mechanism by signalling tissue damage or potential harm. Thus, optimal postoperative pain management is a cornerstone of modern surgical practice, essential for improving recovery outcomes and overall patient well-being. In this study, a total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 each: Group C (clonidine) and Group G (gabapentin). Group C received oral clonidine 100 mcg and Group G received oral gabapentin600 mg one hour prior to the subarachnoid block. Duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, time to rescue analgesia and any side effect of both drugs were assessed in both groups. The duration of motor and sensory blockade, as well as intraoperative hemodynamics and respiratory rates, were comparable between the two groups. Group G exhibited significantly lower VAS scores from 150 minutes postoperatively up to 12 hours (p < 0.001). Additionally, Group G experienced longer duration of postoperative analgesia (16.8±3.9 hours) compared to Group C (9.27±1.7 hours). About 26.6% of the patients in Group C and 6.7% of the patients in Group G presented with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Oral gabapentin at a dosage of 600 mg demonstrates superior efficacy as a premedication compared to oral clonidine 100 mcg for patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia. Group G demonstrated extended postoperative analgesia, lower VASscores, and a reduced incidence of PONV, indicating its superiority over clonidine as an analgesic adjunct.

Optimizing patient-controlled analgesia: a narrative review based on a single center audit process.

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is valuable for delivering opioids in a flexible and timely manner. Although it is designed to offer personalized analgesia driven by the patients themselves, users often report insufficient pain relief, which can be addressed by optimizing its settings and multimodal analgesia. We adopted a systematic approach to modify PCA protocols by utilizing a serial audit process based on institutional PCA data. This review retrospectively examined the process, encompassing data from 13,230 patients who had used PCA devices. The two modifications to the fentanyl-based PCA protocols resulted in three distinct phases. In the first phase, high opioid consumption and unintended PCA withdrawal were the common issues. These were addressed in the second phase by omitting the routine use of basal infusion. However, this led to increased delivery-to-demand ratios, mitigated in the third phase by increasing the bolus dose from 15 μg to 20 μg. These serial protocol changes have produced varied outcomes across different surgical departments, underscoring the need for careful and gradual adjustments and thorough impact assessments. Drawing insights from this audit process, we incorporated findings from the literature on PCA settings and multimodal analgesic approaches. This review underscores the significance of iterative feedback and refinement of analgesic protocols to achieve optimal postoperative pain management. Additionally, it discusses critical considerations regarding the postoperative audit processes.

Post-operative pain control in patients on buprenorphine or methadone for opioid use disorder.

This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in pain scores and opioid consumption after elective surgery in patients maintained on methadone or buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD). Additionally, we investigated the impact of continuing or discontinuing methadone or buprenorphine on post-operative pain outcomes. A single-center retrospective cohort study. Tertiary care medical center. Adults aged 18 years or older with OUD maintained on buprenorphine or methadone who underwent elective surgery between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2021. Patients were identified through electronic medical records, and demographic and clinical data were collected. The primary outcome was opioid consumption at 24 hours post-operatively, measured in milligram morphine equivalents. The secondary outcome was opioid consumption and pain scores up to 72 hours post-operatively, assessed using a numeric rating scale. This study included 366 patients (64 percent on buprenorphine and 36 percent on methadone). Opioid utilization significantly increased when buprenorphine was not administered post-operatively. Both groups exhibited comparable total opioid consumption during the post-operative period. In the buprenorphine cohort, pain scores differed significantly based on the receipt of medications for OUD post-operatively. This study reinforces existing evidence supporting the continuation of medications for opioid use disorder, specifically buprenorphine and methadone, during the perioperative period. Dissemination of guideline recommendations is essential to ensure optimal post-operative pain management for this patient population.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of Programmed Intermittent Bolus vs. Continuous Infusion of Ropivacaine and Fentanyl in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgery.

Programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) is a novel method of intermittent drug delivery commonly employed in labor epidural analgesia. This study aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of PIB over continuous infusion (CI) for postoperative analgesia following upper limb surgeries distal to the mid-humerus level using ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USG-IBPB). The USG-IBPB was performed on a total of 30 patients scheduled for upper limb surgery distal to the mid-humerus level. The patient-controlled regional analgesia pump delivered a combination of 6 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/mL fentanyl via a perineural catheter as PIB in group I and as a CI in group II. The primary outcome measure was overall drug consumption, and secondary outcomes included pain scores, patient satisfaction, sensory and motor blockade, and adverse effects. The PIB group exhibited significantly lower overall drug consumption (306.20 ± 13.07 mL vs. 323.73 ± 11.79 mL; P = 0.001), a reduced need for patient-controlled analgesia boluses (3.87 ± 2.67 vs. 7.13 ± 2.36; P = 0.001), and higher patient satisfaction (91.93 ± 10.09 vs. 78.67 ± 17.57; P = 0.017) compared to the CI group. Pain scores at rest were significantly lower at the 24-hour mark (P = 0.007), and on movement, lower scores were observed after 1, 24, and 36 hours (P = 0.031, P = 0.031, and P = 0.011, respectively). Sensory block, motor block, and adverse effects were similar between the two groups. PIB demonstrated superior efficacy in postoperative analgesia compared to the CI technique for upper limb surgeries distal to the mid-humerus level. Therefore, PIB may be considered an effective alternative to CI for optimal postoperative pain management.

Manajemen Asuhan Keperawatan Pada Ny.M dengan Masalah Nyeri Akut Post Sectio Caesarea

This study aims to describe the nursing management of acute pain problems in optimal one-day care in the Central Surgical Installation Room (IBS) RSUD using a 3M problem-based analysis (man, method, materials). The results of the research show that by carrying out optimal pain management, starting from assessment to evaluation of pain to optimizing non-pharmacological interventions (music therapy and deep breathing relaxation), patient pain complaints show improvement from moderate to mild scale (NRS) as well as the role of nurses in independent intervention also better. Problems studied in the room include the lack of optimal management of acute postoperative pain (from assessment to evaluation of pain, sometimes it is not done in the room), there is no SOP for pain intervention, there is no guideline for handling pain in the room, and the implementation of independent nurse intervention related to pain has not been implemented. In conclusion, with optimal assessment and evaluation of pain, including non-pharmacological technical interventions that are relatively easy to learn and apply independently by nurses, the results obtained are that the client's pain level is reduced from moderate pain on a scale of 5 to low pain on a scale of 3 on the NRS scale.&#x0D; &#x0D; Keywords: Central Surgical Installation, Nursing Care Management, Acute Pain

The benefits and risks of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative analgesia in sinonasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have emerged as an alternative to opioids for optimal postoperative pain management. However, the adoption of NSAIDs in sinonasal surgery has been impeded by a theoretical concern for postoperative bleeding. Our objective is to systematically review the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs for patients undergoing sinonasal surgery. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to January 27, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies in any language were considered. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. Our outcomes were postoperative pain scores, requirement for rescue analgesia, and postoperative adverse events (epistaxis, nausea/vomiting). Out of 4661 records, 15 RCTs (enrolling 1210 patients) and two observational studies were included. Following endoscopic sinus surgery, there was no difference in pain scores between NSAIDs and non-NSAIDs groups (standardized mean differences [SMD] 0.44 units better, 95% CI -0.18 to 1.05). Following septorhinoplasty, NSAIDs decreased pain scores compared to non-NSAID regimens (SMD 1.14 units better, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.67 units better). Overall, NSAIDs reduced the need for rescue medication with a relative risk (RR) of 0.45 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.84). In addition, NSAIDs decreased the risk of nausea with an RR of 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.91) and did not increase the risk of epistaxis (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.23-2.22). Among patients undergoing sinonasal surgery, NSAIDs are beneficial in postoperative pain management and avoidance of postoperative nausea without increasing the risk of postoperative epistaxis.

Safety implications of concomitant administration of antidepressants and opioid analgesics in surgical patients

ABSTRACT Background Commonly prescribed antidepressants (paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine, bupropion) inhibit bioconversion of several prodrug opioid medications to their active metabolite, potentially decreasing analgesic effect. There is a paucity of studies assessing the risk-benefit of concomitant administration of antidepressants and opioids. Research design and methods Observational study of adult patients taking antidepressants prior to scheduled surgery using 2017–2019 electronic medical record data to assess perioperative use of opioids and to determine the incidence and risk factors for developing postoperative delirium. We conducted a generalized linear regression with the Gamma log-link to assess the association between use of antidepressants and opioids and a logistic regression to assess the association between antidepressants use and the likelihood of developing postoperative delirium. Results After controlling for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, and postoperative pain, use of inhibiting antidepressants was associated with 1.67 times greater use of opioids per hospitalization day (p = 0.00154), a two-fold increase in the risk for developing postoperative delirium (p = 0.0224), and an estimated average of four additional days of hospitalization (p < 0.00001) compared to use of non-inhibiting antidepressants. Conclusions Careful consideration to drug-drug interactions and risk of related adverse events remains critical in the safe and optimal management of postoperative pain in patients taking concomitantly antidepressants.

Pain severity scale: A methodology for classifying postoperative pain severity by surgical procedure

BackgroundAcute postoperative pain is common following many types of surgery, and a significant subset of patients experience severe pain, which can be difficult to manage and result in postoperative complications. Opioid agonists are commonly used to treat severe postoperative pain, but their use has been associated with adverse outcomes. This retrospective study uses data from the Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Project (VASQIP) database to develop a postoperative Pain Severity Scale (PSS) based on subjective pain reports and postoperative opioid requirements. MethodsPostoperative pain scores and opioid prescription data were extracted from the VASQIP database for surgeries occurring between 2010 and 2020. Procedures were grouped by surgical Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and a total of 165,321 surgical procedures were examined, representing 1141 distinct CPT codes. K-means clustering analysis was used to group the surgeries based on 24-h maximum pain, 72-h average pain, and postoperative opioid prescriptions. ResultsK-means clustering analysis showed two optimal grouping strategies; one with 3 and the other with 5 groups. Both clustering strategies produced a PSS that categorized surgical procedures with generally increasing pain scores and opioid requirements. The 5-group PSS accurately captured typical postoperative pain experience across a range of procedures. ConclusionsK-means clustering produced a Pain Severity Scale that can distinguish typical postoperative pain for a large variety of surgical procedures based on subjective and objective clinical data. The PSS will facilitate research into the optimal postoperative pain management and could be used in the development of clinical decision support tools.

Modulation of the Inflammatory Response by Pre-emptive Administration of IMT504 Reduces Postoperative Pain in Rats and has Opioid-Sparing Effects

Despite the available knowledge on underlying mechanisms and the development of several therapeutic strategies, optimal management of postoperative pain remains challenging. This preclinical study hypothesizes that, by promoting an anti-inflammatory scenario, pre-emptive administration of IMT504, a noncoding, non-CpG oligodeoxynucleotide with immune modulating properties, will reduce postincisional pain, also facilitating therapeutic opioid-sparing. Male adult Sprague-Dawley rats with unilateral hindpaw skin-muscle incision received pre-emptive (48 and 24 hours prior to surgery) or postoperative (6 hours after surgery) subcutaneous vehicle (saline) or IMT504. Various groups of rats were prepared for pain-like behavior analyses, including subgroups receiving morphine or naloxone, as well as for flow-cytometry or quantitative RT-PCR analyses of the spleen and hindpaws (for analysis of inflammatory phenotype). Compared to vehicle-treated rats, pre-emptive IMT504 significantly reduced mechanical allodynia by 6 hours after surgery, and accelerated recovery of basal responses from 72 hours after surgery and onwards. Cold allodynia was also reduced by IMT504. Postoperative administration of IMT504 resulted in similar positive effects on pain-like behavior. In IMT504-treated rats, 3 mg/kg morphine resulted in comparable blockade of mechanical allodynia as observed in vehicle-treated rats receiving 10 mg/kg morphine. IMT504 significantly increased hindpaw infiltration of mesenchymal stem cells, CD4+T and B cells, and caused upregulated or downregulated transcript expressions of interleukin-10 and interleukin-1β, respectively. Also, IMT504 treatment targeted the spleen, with upregulated or downregulated transcript expressions, 6 hours after incision, of interleukin-10 and interleukin-1β, respectively. Altogether, pre-emptive or postoperative IMT504 provides protection against postincisional pain, through participation of significant immunomodulatory actions, and exhibiting opioid-sparing effects. PerspectiveThis preclinical study introduces the noncoding non-CpG oligodeoxynucleotide IMT504 as a novel modulator of postoperative pain and underlying inflammatory events. The opioid-sparing effects observed for IMT504 appear as a key feature that could contribute, in the future, to reducing opioid-related adverse events in patients undergoing surgical intervention.

Optimal postoperative pain management after VATS lung resection by thoracic epidural analgesia, continuous paravertebral block or single-shot intercostal nerve block (OPtriAL): study protocol of a three-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial

BackgroundAdequate pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection is important to improve postoperative mobilisation, recovery, and to prevent pulmonary complications. So far, no consensus exists on optimal postoperative pain management after VATS anatomic lung resection. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the reference standard for postoperative pain management following VATS. Although the analgesic effect of TEA is clear, it is associated with patient immobilisation, bladder dysfunction and hypotension which may result in delayed recovery and longer hospitalisation. These disadvantages of TEA initiated the development of unilateral regional techniques for pain management. The most frequently used techniques are continuous paravertebral block (PVB) and single-shot intercostal nerve block (ICNB). We hypothesize that using either PVB or ICNB is non-inferior to TEA regarding postoperative pain and superior regarding quality of recovery (QoR). Signifying faster postoperative mobilisation, reduced morbidity and shorter hospitalisation, these techniques may therefore reduce health care costs and improve patient satisfaction.MethodsThis multi-centre randomised study is a three-arm clinical trial comparing PVB, ICNB and TEA in a 1:1:1 ratio for pain (non-inferiority) and QoR (superiority) in 450 adult patients undergoing VATS anatomic lung resection. Patients will not be eligible for inclusion in case of contraindications for TEA, PVB or ICNB, chronic opioid use or if the lung surgeon estimates a high probability that the operation will be performed by thoracotomy. Primary outcomes: (1) the proportion of pain scores ≥ 4 as assessed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) measured during postoperative days (POD) 0–2; and (2) the QoR measured with the QoR-15 questionnaire on POD 1 and 2. Secondary outcome measures are cumulative use of opioids and analgesics, postoperative complications, hospitalisation, patient satisfaction and degree of mobility.DiscussionThe results of this trial will impact international guidelines with respect to perioperative care optimization after anatomic lung resection performed through VATS, and will determine the most cost-effective pain strategy and may reduce variability in postoperative pain management.Trial registration The trial is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) on February 1st, 2021 (NL9243). The NTR is no longer available since June 24th, 2022 and therefore a revised protocol has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on August 5th, 2022 (NCT05491239). Protocol version: version 3 (date 06-05-2022), ethical approval through an amendment (see ethical proof in the Study protocol proof).

Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine for pain control in shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Total shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair surgery result in considerable postoperative pain. Optimal postoperative pain management based on a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to promote early postoperative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to compare liposomal bupivacaine (LB) with traditional, non-LB agents after total arthroplasty or rotator cuff repair surgery. Two independent authors searched the PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library websites for suitable articles. We included randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes after the administration of LB and non-LB agents for rotator cuff repair or total shoulder arthroplasty. The outcome measures for our meta-analysis were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 24 and 48 hours after surgery, opioid consumption 24 and 48 hours after surgery, hospital stay duration, and complications within 48 hours after surgery. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) tool to assess the degree of evidence for the outcomes, and we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool to assess the risk of bias. The current meta-analysis comprised 11 randomized controlled studies with 846 subjects. Seven studies used local infiltration to administer LB, and 3 used a block. Our pooled analysis results showed no significant difference in VAS pain scores at 24 hours after surgery (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.55 to 0.01; prediction interval, -1.25 to 0.70), VAS pain scores at 48 hours after surgery (SMD, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.09; prediction interval, -1.10 to 0.73), opioid consumption at 24 hours after surgery (SMD, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.27 to 0.34; prediction interval, -1.01 to 1.09), and opioid consumption at 48 hours after surgery (SMD, 0.10; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.64; prediction interval, -1.76 to 1.96) between the LB and non-LB groups. The LB and non-LB groups had similar hospital stay durations (SMD, -0.38; 95% CI, -1.51 to 0.74; prediction interval, -14.7 to 13.9) and adverse events (risk ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.36) following the shoulder procedures. The level of evidence was low according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) analysis. Our meta-analysis provides evidence indicating that LB is similar to non-LB agents in terms of overall pain relief and opioid requirements. The duration of hospital stay and complication rates were also similar in the 2 groups. Future well-designed and adequately powered randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our results and to be able to recommend LB for various types of shoulder operations.

Post-Operative Endodontic Pain Management: An Overview of Systematic Reviews on Post-Operatively Administered Oral Medications and Integrated Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations.

Endodontic treatment comprises the overall management of pre-, intra- and post-operative symptoms, including post-operative endodontic pain, considered as a complication susceptible of chronicization. Post-operative pain is very common and highly unpreventable and has a multi-factorial etiology and a potential pathogenic link to the acute inflammation of the periapical area, secondary to localized chemical, mechanical, host and/or microbial damage occurring during endodontic treatment. Considering the multitude of heterogeneous technical and pharmacological approaches proposed to control post-operative endodontic pain, the present study primarily comprised an overview of systematic reviews of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, summarizing findings on post-operatively administered oral medications for post-operative endodontic pain control, in order to note the most effective type and dosage of such drugs. Secondarily, a narrative review of the current evidence on technical solutions to be observed during endodontic treatment procedures, to control post-operative pain, was conducted to provide integrated evidence-based clinical recommendations for optimal post-operative endodontic pain management.

Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block as Postoperative Analgesic Technique for Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Case Series.

IntroductionThe erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a recently implemented analgesic technique initially reported for thoracic analgesia and subsequently adopted for both intra- and postoperative pain management. Thoracic surgery is among the most painful surgical procedures, even when conducted with minimally invasive approach. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) challenges the traditional analgesic regimens as one of its aims is to decrease the patient’s length of stay (LOS) whilst achieving optimal postoperative pain management. Furthermore, there is lots of growing evidence on the impact of poorly controlled postoperative pain (PP) on the development of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). In these case series, we aim to describe our preliminary experience of postoperative pain management with continuous ESPB in the field of RATS.Case Series PresentationIn eight consecutive patients undergoing elective RATS procedure, we performed the ESPB after surgery with an initial bolus of local anesthetic followed by catheter insertion for continuous infusion. The infusion of local anesthetic lasted for the first two postoperative days. The effectiveness of the ESPB was evaluated through serial pain assessment with numeric rate scale (NRS) score, both at rest and during movement every 6 hours. Any analgesic rescue drug prescription was reported. We noted that the ESPB strongly reduced the prescription of opioids and of rescue analgesic. In our series, only one patient needed opioids during the first two postoperative days, and no rescue analgesic administration was noted in the remaining cases.ConclusionWe report a small but promising experience regarding postoperative pain management with continuous ESPB performed after RATS. We implemented the ESPB before surgery. Larger studies on postoperative pain management with continuous regional blocks in thoracic surgery are warranted.

MP03-19 SUPPORT FOR MINIMIZING NARCOTIC REQUIREMENT FOLLOWING URETHROPLASTY

You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: Urethral Reconstruction (including Stricture, Diverticulum) I (MP03)1 Sep 2021MP03-19 SUPPORT FOR MINIMIZING NARCOTIC REQUIREMENT FOLLOWING URETHROPLASTY Chase Mallory, Alejandra Perez, Adam Nolte, Scott Jamieson, Jessica Boyer, Dhaval Jivanji, Spencer Liem, and Billy Cordon Chase MalloryChase Mallory More articles by this author , Alejandra PerezAlejandra Perez More articles by this author , Adam NolteAdam Nolte More articles by this author , Scott JamiesonScott Jamieson More articles by this author , Jessica BoyerJessica Boyer More articles by this author , Dhaval JivanjiDhaval Jivanji More articles by this author , Spencer LiemSpencer Liem More articles by this author , and Billy CordonBilly Cordon More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001964.19AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The opioid epidemic has led to increased use of non-narcotic post-surgical pain management. While many studies have assessed preoperative adjunct measures to decrease postoperative narcotic requirements, few studies have looked directly at optimal postoperative pain management following urethroplasty both in the peri- and postoperative settings and upon discharge. In this study, we aim to characterize pain control for patients undergoing urethroplasty and provide alternative non-narcotic adjuncts. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and procedural characteristics for all patients that underwent urethroplasty at our institution from August 2016 through February 2021. The primary outcome was milligram morphine equivalents (MME) which is the amount of morphine (mg) equal to the strength of opioid prescribed. We utilized peripheral nerve blocks intraoperatively including a pudendal block along with a long buccal nerve block prior to buccal mucosa harvest, performed by infiltrating the buccal sulcus just distal to the last molar tooth. This strategy was implemented on December 2018 in efforts to decrease perioperative morbidity associated with buccal harvest. RESULTS: We identified 77 patients that underwent urethroplasty: 58% augmented and 26% anastomotic. 60% of patients did not receive any narcotics in the immediate postoperative period while 32.5% received 0.1-5 MME, and only 6.5% received >5 MME. When comparing groups before and after implementation of buccal nerve block, patients received 3.7 vs 1.18 MME (p=0.021) in the immediate postop period and 15.8 and 8.9 ME (p= 0.22) during admission. When breaking down by surgery type, we also noted a trend for patients who had augmented urethroplasty to have higher MME requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Non-narcotic alternatives following urethroplasty, such as NSAIDs and anticholinergics are viable options for pain control in certain patient cohorts. Our preliminary analysis demonstrates decreased need for post-operative narcotic pain control with intra-operative nerve blocks. Further studies will focus on identifying patient factors predictive of narcotic requirement to build an algorithmic approach that would minimize narcotic use and ultimately addiction. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e28-e28 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Chase Mallory More articles by this author Alejandra Perez More articles by this author Adam Nolte More articles by this author Scott Jamieson More articles by this author Jessica Boyer More articles by this author Dhaval Jivanji More articles by this author Spencer Liem More articles by this author Billy Cordon More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...

Postoperative Analgesia after Open Liver Surgery: Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence.

Background: The existing recommendations for after open liver surgery, published in 2019, contains limited evidence on the use of regional analgesia techniques. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize available clinical evidence, published after September 2013, on systemic or blended postoperative analgesia for the prevention or treatment of postoperative pain after open liver surgery. Methods: The PUBMED and EMBASE registries were used for the literature search to identify suitable studies. Keywords for the literature search were selected, with the authors’ agreement, using the PICOS approach: participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design. Results: The literature search led to the retrieval of a total of 800 studies. A total of 36 studies including 25 RCTs, 5 prospective observational, and 7 retrospective observational studies were selected as suitable for this systematic review. Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that, in these patients, optimal postoperative pain management should rely on using a “blended approach” which includes the use of systemic opioids and the infusion of NSAIDs along with regional techniques. This approach warrants the highest efficacy in terms of pain prevention, including the lower incretion of postoperative “stress hormones”, and fewer side effects. Furthermore, concerns about the potential for the increased risk of wound infection related to the use of regional techniques have been ruled out.

Short term outcomes of Laser Pile Ablation (LPA) to treat II-III degree symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease.

Introduction The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of Laser Pile Ablation (LPA) in patients affected by II-III degree symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease. Material and Methods Consecutive patients suffering of II-III degree symptomatic HD were enrolled to undergo LPA. The primary study endpoint was to assess the post-operative pain using NRS scale (0-10) and the use of painkiller. Secondary endpoints were: intraoperative, postoperative complications and recurrence rate (including bleeding and prolapse). Patients satisfaction was assessed at 6- and 12-months using VAS scale (0-10) and also through the questions “Would you undergo this surgery again?” and “Would you recommend this procedure to a relative or friend?”. Results Twenty-five patients (7F–18M) were enrolled in the study. All the procedures were performed under spinal anesthesia and the mean amount of energy delivered was 472.6±50.7 J. The mean follow-up was 9 months (range 6-12). Mean postoperative pain, assessed through NRS scale, was 4.7±1.5 at 12 h, 4.4±1.3 at 24 h and 2.2±1.0 at day 10. The pain was managed with paracetamol 1 gr only 30.7 % required NSAIDs in addition for 3 days. Recurrence rate was 7.7% at 3 and 6 months after the procedure referring persistent bleeding. The mean time interval to return to work is 2.7±2.1 days. All the patients were extremely satisfied of the procedure VAS 9. Conclusion LPA resulted to be a safe, effective and minimally invasive procedure to treat II-III degree HD with optimal management of post-operative pain and excellent patient satisfaction.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of multidimensional pain assessment tools used in postoperative adult patients: a systematic review of measurement properties.

The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the best available evidence relating to the measurement properties of the multidimensional pain assessment tools used to assess postoperative pain in adults. Pain is a common and poorly managed occurrence in patients during the postoperative period. Currently, postoperative pain is usually evaluated with assessment tools that measure one dimension of pain, namely pain intensity, resulting in inadequate management of postoperative pain. It is important to understand the complex nature of pain by considering all dimensions for optimal postoperative pain management. Systematic, robust evidence is lacking regarding the most psychometrically reliable and valid multidimensional pain assessment tool for adult postoperative patients. This systematic review considered all study types for inclusion. Studies were considered if they assessed the measurement properties of a multidimensional pain assessment tool in adult postoperative patients within two weeks post-surgery. The outcomes included measurement of at least one of the psychometric properties, including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. A three-step search strategy was undertaken, including a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and CINAHL databases performed in October 2019. We also searched Dissertation Abstracts International, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, MedNar, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished studies. The title and abstracts of the studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the potential studies was assessed independently by three reviewers using the COSMIN checklist. Seventeen studies involving five multidimensional postoperative pain assessment tools were included in the review: American Pain Society Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-Revised; Brief Pain Inventory; Houston Pain Outcome Instrument; McGill Pain Questionnaire; and the Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management Postoperative Pain Questionnaire. The two most commonly used tools were the Brief Pain Inventory and the American Pain Society Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-Revised, which were assessed in six studies each. The included studies mainly reported internal consistency reliability, with four of the five identified tools demonstrating high Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.72 to 0.92. However, the Houston Pain Outcome Instrument demonstrated mixed findings, with eight of the nine subscales having moderate to high reliability while the expectations about pain subscale had poor reliability (α=0.003). This review provides much needed information about the current tools used in many clinical, educational, and research settings. Of the five tools included in this review, the Brief Pain Inventory demonstrated strong evidence of psychometric validity and is recommended for use in assessing postoperative pain. Further psychometric validation of multidimensional postoperative pain assessment tools with emphasis on responsiveness and measurement error is required in order to accurately assess the minimal clinically important difference in postoperative pain outcomes.

Increased opioid use following rotator cuff repair associated with prior opioid use and surgeon prescription patterns

Prescription opioids are standard of care for postoperative pain management after musculoskeletal surgery, but there is no guidelineor consensus on best practices. Variability in the intensity of opioids prescribed for postoperative recovery has been documented, but it is unclear whether this variability is clinically motivated or associated with provider practice patterns, or how this variation is associated with patient outcomes. This study described variation in the intensity of opioids prescribed for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR)and examined associations with provider prescribing patterns and patients' long-term opioid use outcomes. Medicare data from 2010 to 2012 were used to identify 16,043 RCRs for patients with new shoulder complaints in 2011. Two measures of perioperative opioid use were created: (1) any opioid fill occurring 3 days before to 7 days after RCR and (2) total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) of all opioid fills during that period. Patient outcomes for persistent opioid use after RCR included (1) any opioid fill from 90 to 180 days after RCR and (2) the lack of any 30-day gap in opioid availability during that period. Generalized linear regression models were used to estimate associations between provider characteristics and opioid use for RCR, and between opioid use and outcomes. All models adjusted for patient clinical and demographic characteristics. Separate analyses were done for patients with and without opioid use in the 180 days before RCR. In this sample, 54% of patients undergoing RCR were opioid naive at the time of RCR. Relative to prior users, a greater proportion of opioid naive users had any opioid fill (85.7% vs. 75.4%), but prior users received more MMEs than naive users (565 vs. 451 MMEs). Providers' opioid prescribing for other patients was associated with the intensity of perioperative opioids received for RCR. Total MMEs received for RCR were associated with higher odds of persistent opioid use 90-180 days after RCR. The intensity of opioids received by patients for postoperative pain appears to be partially determined by the prescribing habits of their providers. Greater intensity of opioids received is, in turn, associated with greater odds of patterns of chronic opioid use after surgery. More comprehensive, patient-centered guidance on opioid prescribing is needed to help surgeons provide optimal postoperative pain management plans, balancing needs for short-term symptom relief and risks for long-term outcomes.

Randomised trial of perioperative tramadol for canine sterilisation pain management.

Surgical sterilisation to manage free-roaming dog populations is widely used in many countries. However, few studies have examined optimal postoperative pain management regimens at low-resource, high-throughput veterinary clinics. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of two intravenous analgesic regimens, preoperative administration of meloxicam and tramadol, or meloxicam alone, in free-roaming dogs undergoing sterilisation. A total of 125 dogs were included, with 64 dogs in the meloxicam-tramadol arm and 61 dogs in the meloxicam-only arm in a non-inferiority study design. Pain levels in sterilisation surgery patients were assessed at four time points after surgery using the Colorado State University Canine Acute Pain Scale, a Visual Analogue Scale and a modified version of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale - Short Form. Non-inferiority was supported for each of the main scoring outcomes using non-inferiority margins of 0.5, 5 and 0.8, respectively. One dog from the meloxicam-tramadol group and four dogs in the meloxicam-only arm required rescue analgesia, with no difference between groups (P=0.21).The study demonstrated that meloxicam was effective in controlling postoperative pain in a high proportion of dogs. The addition of tramadol alongside meloxicam treatment was not found to be of clinical benefit.

Optimal postoperative pain management: redefining the role for opioids

Optimal postoperative pain management: redefining the role for opioids