Opti-Free Express Research Articles

Reduction of disinfection efficacy of contact lens care products on the global market in the presence of contact lenses and cases

ObjectiveSight-threatening infections can be caused by pathogenic micro-organisms colonising the cornea, leading to microbial keratitis (MK). These micro-organisms can be introduced to the eye via improper contact lens use and...

Enhancement of Contact Lens Disinfection by Combining Disinfectant with Visible Light Irradiation.

Multiple use contact lenses have to be disinfected overnight to reduce the risk of infections. However, several studies demonstrated that not only microorganisms are affected by the disinfectants, but also ocular epithelial cells, which come into contact via residuals at reinsertion of the lens. Visible light has been demonstrated to achieve an inactivation effect on several bacterial and fungal species. Combinations with other disinfection methods often showed better results compared to separately applied methods. We therefore investigated contact lens disinfection solutions combined with 405 nm irradiation, with the intention to reduce the disinfectant concentration of ReNu Multiplus, OptiFree Express or AOSept while maintaining adequate disinfection results due to combination benefits. Pseudomonads, staphylococci and E. coli were studied with disk diffusion assay, colony forming unit (cfu) determination and growth delay. A log reduction of 4.49 was achieved for P. fluorescens in 2 h for 40% ReNu Multiplus combined with an irradiation intensity of 20 mW/cm2 at 405 nm. For AOSept the combination effect was so strong that 5% of AOSept in combination with light exhibited the same result as 100% AOSept alone. Combination of disinfectants with visible violet light is therefore considered a promising approach, as a reduction of potentially toxic ingredients can be achieved.

Effect of multipurpose care solutions upon physical dimensions of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Interactions between contact lens multipurpose solution (MPS) components and the contact lenses with which they are used are both lens and solution dependent. As such, lens dimensional changes may arise after cleaning and immersion cycling in different lens care solutions over different time courses. In this study, the dimensional stability of five planned-replacement silicone hydrogel lenses (lotrafilcon B, comfilcon A, senofilcon A, senofilcon C, and samfilcon A) over 30 cycles in three different MPSs (Biotrue, OPTI-FREE Express, and OPTI-FREE Puremoist) was evaluated. Measurements of diameter, sagittal depth, power, roundness, and center thickness were obtained prior to, during, and after 30 cycles of cleaning and storage. Diameters of all lenses increased when soaked in Express or Biotrue but held the International Standards Organization (ISO) tolerance over the full course of 30 disinfection cycles; however, the diameters of comfilcon A, senofilcon A, senofilcon C, and samfilcon A lenses soaked in Puremoist exceeded ISO tolerance after between 4 and 9 immersion cycles. In contrast, the diameter of lotrafilcon B held tolerance. Similarly, all lenses cycled in Express or Biotrue held tolerance for sagittal depth, while in Puremoist only lotrafilcon B held tolerance. All lenses became less round in all MPSs but held tolerance for both power and central thickness. Given the lack of reported clinical issues with Puremoist when used with lenses other than lotrafilcon B, we propose that it may be appropriate to revisit the ISO test methods and tolerances to determine if they are still applicable for silicone hydrogel lenses.

Adhesion of Acanthamoeba on Cosmetic Contact Lenses.

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the adhesion of Acanthamoeba trophozoites on cosmetic contact lenses (CLs) with and without CL care multipurpose solution (MPS) treatment.MethodsAcanthamoeba lugdunensis L3a trophozoites were inoculated onto disks trimmed from CLs: 1-day Acuvue moist, 1-day Acuvue define, Acuvue 2, and Acuvue 2 define. After 18-hour inoculation, the number of adherent trophozoites was counted under phase contrast microscopy. The effects of MPS, Opti-Free Express, soaking CLs for 6 hours, on Acanthamoeba adhesion were analyzed. Scanning electron microscopic examination was performed for assessment of Acanthamoeba attached on the lens surface.ResultsAcanthamoeba trophozoites showed greater adhesion to cosmetic CL (P = 0.017 for 1-day CL and P = 0.009 for 2-week CL) although there was no significant difference between the types of cosmetic CL. On all lenses, the number of adherent Acanthamoeba was significantly reduced after treatment with MPS (P < 0.001 for 1-day Acuvue moist, P = 0.046 for 1-day Acuvue define, P < 0.001 for Acuvue 2, and P = 0.015 for Acuvue 2 define), but there was still significant difference between conventional and cosmetic CLs (P = 0.003 for 1-day CL and P < 0.001 for 2-week CL, respectively). More attachment of Acanthamoeba was observed on colored area and the acanthopodia of Acanthamoeba was placed on the rough surface of colored area.ConclusionAcanthamoeba showed a greater affinity for cosmetic CL and mostly attached on colored area. Although MPS that contained myristamidopropyl dimethylamine reduced the adhesion rate, there was a significant difference between conventional and cosmetic CLs.

The comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of contact lens solutions

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of widely used multipurpose contact lens solutions against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in addition to cystic and trophozoite forms of Acanthamoeba castellanii and A. polyphaga, that cause microbial keratitis. Three multipurpose solutions were tested: SOLO-care, ReNu, and Opti-Free Express. The test solutions were challenged with P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) and S. aureus (ATCC 2913) based on the ISO stand-alone and regiment test procedure for disinfecting products, A. polyphaga (ATCC 30871) and A. castellanii (1501/1A) cystic and trophozoite forms. Multipurpose solutions were sampled for surviving microorganisms at manufacturer's minimum recommended disinfection time. The number of viable organisms was determined, and log reductions were calculated. ReNu and SOLO-care resulted in a reduction greater than the required mean 3.0 logarithmic reduction against S. aureus, and SOLO-care and Opti-Free Express resulted in a reduction more than the required mean 3.0 logarithmic reduction against P. aeruginosa. Against the cystic and trophozoite forms of A. castellanii, the log reduction provided by SOLO-care was 1.01 and 1.31 log, respectively. ReNu provided a 0.83 log reduction of the cystic form and a 1.21 log reduction of the trophozoite form. Using Opti-Free Express, the log reduction for both forms was 1.31. SOLO-care led to a 0.61 log reduction of the cystic form of A. polyphaga and a 1.01 log reduction of the trophozoite form. ReNu provided a 0.41 log reduction of the cystic form and a 4.99 log reduction of the trophozoite form. Opti-free Express resulted in a 0.89 log reduction of the cystic form and a 3.11 log reduction of the trophozoite form. Multipurpose contact lens solutions using similar regimens can show different disinfection abilities.

Accuracy of a Freezing Point Depression Technique Osmometer.

The purpose of this study was to examine the precision and accuracy of the Fiske 110 Osmolarity System under different protocols to determine the possible applications of this device in tear film research and clinical practice. Three separate studies were performed. In the first, Fiske 110 measurements were made on undiluted and diluted (1:1, 1:4, and 1:9 dilutions) standard samples of different osmolarity values: 50, 290, and 850 mOsm/kg and 297 and 338 mOsm/L. In the second study, measurements were made on different types of contact lens care solutions. Finally, in an agreement study, measurements were made in two sets of 60 subjects to compare TearLab versus Fiske 110 (using both 2- and 4-μL tear sample). Although osmolarity measurements for undiluted solutions differed statistically from reference standard values, all biases were in the tolerance range proposed by the manufacturer except for the 850-mOsm/kg solution. No significant differences from reference osmolarity values were observed for the 1:1 and 1:4 diluted 297- and 338-mOsm/L H2O solutions, respectively, although all diluted solutions showed a possible bias out of the range provided. Osmolarities for the soft contact lens solutions fell within the range 293 to 309 mOsm/kg with the exception of Opti-Free Express (225 mOsm/kg). In the agreement study, significant differences were observed between measurements obtained using the TearLab and both Fiske 110 procedures, although the Fiske 110 (4 μL) procedure was closer to the TearLab than the Fiske (2 μL) procedure. For undiluted solutions, the Fiske 110 shows good performance, making it a useful device for osmolarity measurements in lens care solutions or eye drops. A worse performance was observed for more diluted standard solution samples. When testing diluted samples, performance was acceptable for osmolarity values close to tear values.

Status of the effectiveness of contact lens solutions against keratitis-causing pathogens.

The aim of this study was to assess the antimicrobial effects of marketed contact lens disinfecting solutions. Using ISO 14729 Stand-Alone Test for disinfecting solutions, bactericidal, fungicidal and amoebicidal assays of eight different contact lens solutions including: ReNu MultiPlus, DuraPlus, Ultimate Plus, OptiFree Express, Kontex Clean, Kontex Normal, Kontex Multisol extra(+), Kontex Soak were performed. The efficacy of contact lens solutions was determined against keratitis-causing microbes, namely: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Fusarium solani and Acanthamoeba castellanii. The results revealed that ReNu MultiPlus, DuraPlus and OptiFree Express were effective in killing bacterial and fungal pathogens as per manufacturer's minimum recommended disinfection time. Ultimate Plus was effective against F. solani and MRSA but ineffective against P. aeruginosa, S. marcescens and S. aureus. Of concern however, is that none of the locally formulated contact lens disinfecting solutions from Pakistan, i.e., Kontex Clean, Kontex Normal, Kontex Multisol extra(+) and Kontex Soak were effective against any of the keratitis-causing organisms tested. All eight contact lens disinfecting solutions were unable to destroy Acanthamoeba cysts. Because such ineffective contact lens disinfection solutions present a major risk to public health, these findings are of great concern to the health officials and to the manufacturers of the contact lens disinfection solutions and effective solutions are needed, along with emphasis on proper hygiene for contact lens care and special guidelines for developing countries regarding the manufacture and storage of contact lens disinfecting solutions.

Inefficacy of marketed contact lens disinfection solutions against keratitis-causing Acanthamoeba castellanii belonging to the T4 genotype

The aim of this study was to assess the anti-amoebic effects of marketed contact lens disinfecting solutions. Using amoebistatic, amoebicidal, and cysticidal assays, nine different contact lens solutions were tested including: ReNu MultiPlus, DuraPlus, Ultimate Plus, OptiFree Replenish, OptiFree Express, Kontex Clean, Kontex Normal, Kontex Multisol extra+, Kontex Soak. In vitro growth inhibition (amoebistatic) assays were performed by incubating Acanthamoeba castellanii with aforementioned contact lens disinfection solutions as per manufacturer’s instructions in the growth medium for up to 48h at 30°C. To determine amoebicidal and cysticidal effects, amoebae were incubated with contact lens solutions in phosphate buffered saline for 24h and viability was determined by haemocytometer counting as well as re-inoculating them in the growth medium. For controls, solutions were tested against bacterial corneal pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as amoebae were incubated with the solvent alone. Of the nine contact lens solutions tested, none of them showed potent amoebicidal effects. Only DuraPlus and OptiFree Replenish exhibited trophozoite lysis of 85.3% and 73.7% respectively. In contrast, all contact lens disinfection solutions except Kontex Clean, Kontex Normal, Kontex Multisol extra+, tested showed amoebistatic effects. Importantly, none of the contact lens disinfection solutions exhibited cysticidal effects using qualitative assays, i.e., cysts treated with aforementioned solutions re-emerged as viable amoebae upon inoculation in the growth medium. However, more than 3-log reduction was observed when ReNu MultiPlus, DuraPlus and OptiFree Express were tested against P. aeruginosa which is in accordance with the ISO Stand-Alone Primary acceptance criteria. These findings are of great concern for contact lens users.

Impact of Silicone Hydrogel Lenses and Solutions on Corneal Epithelial Permeability

The primary purpose of this pilot study was to compare epithelial barrier function (EBF) and staining in a small group of participants using a silicone hydrogel (SH) lens worn on a daily basis with two different care regimens. Secondarily, the aim was to see if there was any correlation between corneal staining and EBF. The corneal EBF of 10 non-lens wearers (control) and 15 age-matched asymptomatic SH contact lens wearers (test) were assessed using fluorophotometry. Biomicroscopy was performed to assess corneal staining after the EBF was measured. The lens wearers wore PureVision (FDA group V) SH lenses for two consecutive 1-month periods while using either Alcon Opti-Free Express or Renu Fresh using a randomized, investigator-masked, crossover design. Control subjects were assessed on one occasion, and lens wearers were examined before fitting with lenses and after 7, 14, and 28 days of lens wear, with each combination. Compared with the control group, both study groups had an increase in epithelial permeability at baseline (p ≤ 0.04). There were no changes in EBF during the treatment period for either solution (p = 0.87). A significant difference in EBF was found between the test groups during the treatment period (p = 0.02), with greater permeability in the Renu Fresh-disinfected lenses. There was poor correlation between corneal staining and EBF (r = 0.35, p > 0.05) because of large individual variations. Daily wear of highly oxygen-permeable SH lenses increases corneal epithelial permeability to fluorescein probably because of increased mechanical effects. In addition, certain lens-solution interactions can add to this effect, as seen in this study. Despite having a low amount of central corneal staining in the Renu Fresh group, staining and EBF did not prove to be well correlated. The presence of central corneal staining is a confounding factor when measuring EBF.

In Vitro Efficacy of Contact Lens Solutions Against Various Corneal Fungal Isolates

To investigate the susceptibility of different fungal corneal isolates to commercially available contact lens disinfecting solutions. Thirteen filamentous fungal isolates (9 Aspergillus spp, 3 Fusarium spp, 1 Curvularia sp.) recovered from corneal infections were used. The following solutions were tested: Arion Cronos, Complete Revitalens, Dua Elite, Opti-Free Express, Regard, Oxysept Comfort, and Oxysept Comfort without catalase. Suspensions of the different fungal isolates were made in the solutions (10(6) colony-forming units/mL). After 1 h (Arion Cronos only), 6, 8, and 24 h, aliquots of suspension were removed and seeded on Sabouraud agar plates. After a 6-h exposure, only 3% hydrogen peroxide-based Oxysept Comfort without catalase eradicated all the fungi tested. All the other solutions were partly ineffective at killing some of the fungal isolates, even after a 24-h exposure. The worst performance was given by Regard and Dua Elite, which, after a 6-h exposure, showed growth of 12 and 10 of the 13 fungal strains tested, respectively. Most contact lens disinfecting solutions may not be sufficiently effective, if contact lens care systems become contaminated with filamentous fungi. In our experiment, only an exposure to 3% hydrogen peroxide without a neutralizer for at least 6 h was always able to kill an inoculum of different fungal strains.

Susceptibility of various corneal fungal isolates and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to contact lens disinfecting solutions

We aimed to investigate the susceptibility of a combined inoculum of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and different fungal strains to 6 soft contact lens disinfectants. One corneal isolate of P. aeruginosa and 13 corneal fungal isolates (9 Aspergillus spp, 3 Fusarium spp, 1 Curvularia sp.) were used. The following solutions were tested: Arion Cronos, Complete RevitaLens, Dua Elite, Opti-Free Express, Regard, Oxysept Comfort, and Oxysept Comfort without catalase. The effect of the solutions was assessed on a combined inoculum of P. aeruginosa plus 1 fungal strain. Suspensions of P. aeruginosa and fungi were made in the solutions (1x106 colony-forming units/mL). After 1 hour (Arion Cronos only), 6, 8, and 24 hours, aliquots of suspension were removed and seeded on Luria-Bertani and Sabouraud agar plates. After 6 hours' exposure, all the solutions but Dua Elite and Oxysept Comfort eradicated P. aeruginosa. Conversely, apart from 3% hydrogen peroxide-based Oxysept Comfort without catalase, which eradicated all the fungi tested after 6 hours, all the other solutions were partly ineffective at killing some of the fungal isolates, even after 24 hours' exposure. Most contact lens disinfectants may be ineffective if contact lens care systems become co-contaminated with P. aeruginosa and fungi. In our experiment, only exposure to 3% hydrogen peroxide without neutralizer for at least 6 hours was always able to kill a combined inoculum of P. aeruginosa and different fungal strains.

Eliminating adhesion errors in nanoindentation of compliant polymers and hydrogels

Nanoindentation is a valuable tool for characterization of biomaterials due to its ability to measure local properties in heterogeneous, small or irregularly shaped samples. However, applying nanoindentation to compliant, hydrated biomaterials leads to many challenges including adhesion between the nanoindenter tip and the sample. Although adhesion leads to overestimation of the modulus of compliant samples when analyzing nanoindentation data using traditional analysis techniques, most studies of biomaterials have ignored its effects. This paper demonstrates two methods for managing adhesion in nanoindentation analysis, the nano-JKR force curve method and the surfactant method, through application to two biomedically-relevant compliant materials, poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) elastomers and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels. The nano-JKR force curve method accounts for adhesion during data analysis using equations based on the Johnson–Kendall–Roberts (JKR) adhesion model, while the surfactant method eliminates adhesion during data collection, allowing data analysis using traditional techniques. In this study, indents performed in air or water resulted in adhesion between the tip and the sample, while testing the same materials submerged in Optifree Express® contact lens solution eliminated tip-sample adhesion in most samples. Modulus values from the two methods were within 7% of each other, despite different hydration conditions and evidence of adhesion. Using surfactant also did not significantly alter the properties of the tested material, allowed accurate modulus measurements using commercial software, and facilitated nanoindentation testing in fluids. This technique shows promise for more accurate and faster determination of modulus values from nanoindentation of compliant, hydrated biological samples.

Effect of Multipurpose Solutions on Cell Morphology and Cytokine Production by Corneal Epithelial Cells

We sought to determine whether human corneal limbal epithelial cells (HCLE) differ in their physiological response and production of inflammatory mediators during exposure to two multipurpose disinfecting solutions that differ in only four excipients. HCLE were exposed to dilutions (1%-20%) of OPTI-FREE Express and OPTI-FREE RepleniSH for 2, 6, or 18 h. Cell numbers were measured using CyQuant and metabolic activity assays. Morphology, viability, and apoptotic changes were examined by confocal microscopy after staining with Calcein AM/propidium iodide or Hoechst 33,342/propidiun iodide/YO-PRO-1. Cytokine responses and arachidonic acid metabolites were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. OPTI-FREE Express showed greater reductions in corneal cell metabolic activity (up to 3-fold) than OPTI-FREE RepleniSH over 18 h. Cells exposed to OPTI-FREE Express were highly vacuolated, whereas those exposed to OPTI-FREE RepleniSH had morphology consistent with a presumed apoptotic response. OPTI-FREE Express elicited higher levels of interleukin (IL)-6 (maximum 4225 ± 300 pg/mL) and IL-8 (maximum 1094 ± 250 pg/mL) from cells than OPTI-FREE RepleniSH (maximum of 1717 ± 225 pg/mL and 930 ± 300 pg/mL, respectively) at all concentrations tested after 18 h. HCLE did not produce leukotriene B4 or prostaglandin E2 on stimulation, and IL-1β was produced in low levels, but its production was not different between multipurpose disinfecting solution types. The findings reported here are the first to describe the pattern of cytokine production produced in corneal epithelial cells in response to contact lens solutions. Alteration of only four excipients in the formulations had such effects on corneal epithelia; however, these differences do not explain differences in the incidences of corneal infiltrative events between these solutions. This might indicate that changes in the rates of infiltrative events result from interactions of the solutions with the contact lens surface, or directly with the corneal immune system, or as the result of gram-negative contamination of lens cases.

Contact Lens Case Cleaning Procedures Affect Storage Solution pH and Osmolality

To investigate pH and osmolality changes in the solutions stored in contact lens (CL) cases, when different case rinsing and drying methods are used on a daily basis. Four multipurpose solutions (Opti-Free Express, Solo-Care Aqua, Re-Nu Multiplus, and Complete) and two hydrogen peroxide systems (AOsept and Oxysept) were studied. Cases were filled with the solutions and kept sealed. After 8 h, the cases underwent different rinsing (rinsing; non-rinsing) and drying (air drying-AD; lint-free tissue drying-LFTD; non-drying-ND) procedures on a daily basis. Five cases of each rinsing/drying combination for each solution were evaluated. The pH and osmolality of the case-contained solution were evaluated on the 1st, 7th, 15th, and then, 30th day. pH and osmolality increased significantly from day 1 to 30, except for Complete in which a significant decrease in pH was found. Rinsing vs. non-rinsing CL cases did not have any influence on the pH or osmolality, except for Oxysept, which showed a significantly higher osmolality value when cases were not rinsed. However, the drying procedure did influence both measurements; pH was significantly higher in the AD compared with the ND group (p < 0.05), and there was a significant difference in osmolality between the three drying conditions (p < 0.05), with the AD group showing the highest values, and the LFTD group showing the lowest. Osmolality and pH values are time and drying process-dependent in a CL case cleaning schedule. Regarding drying conditions, LFTD causes less increase in osmolality. Future studies should determine whether these changes might affect bacterial growth, lens parameters, or subject comfort during CL wear.

Detection of virulence factors in Serratia strains isolated from contact lens‐associated corneal ulcers

This paper reports on the microbiological findings pertaining to three Serratia isolates from soft contact lens-related corneal ulcers, which represent a complication of contact lens wear reported with increasing frequency. Bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using the Vitek system. Serratia's ability to form biofilm, produce gelatinase, elastase and alkaline protease, and invade human corneal epithelial (HCE) cells was investigated. The isolates' susceptibility to the following disinfectants was tested: (a) ReNu MultiPlus(®) , containing polyaminopropyl biguanide 0.0001%; (b) Opti-Free Express(®) , containing polyquaternium-1 0.001% and myristamidopropyldimethylamine 0.0005%; (c) Opti-Free Replenish(®) , containing polyquaternium-1 0.001% and myristamidopropyldimethylamine 0.0005%, and (d) Oxysept Comfort(®) , a one-step 3% hydrogen peroxide-catalase system. Two Serratia marcescens and one Serratia liquefaciens were identified. All the strains were susceptible to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. No isolate formed biofilm or significantly invaded HCE cells; all produced alkaline protease and gelatinase, but not elastase. Opti-Free Express(®) and Opti-Free Replenish(®) were active against S. liquefaciens, but failed to kill the S. marcescens isolates within the minimum recommended time (6 hours). ReNu MultiPlus(®) needed 6 hours to kill one strain of S. marcescens, which is 2 hours more than recommended. Conversely, Oxysept Comfort(®) was always effective within the minimum recommended time (6 hours). The ability to produce alkaline protease and gelatinase may play a major role in the pathogenesis of contact lens-related Serratia keratitis. Several types of contact lens solutions may be ineffective in eradicating Serratia from contaminated contact lens cases within the minimum recommended time. Only exposure to Oxysept Comfort(®) was always effective against Serratia in this study.

Impact of Multipurpose Solutions Released from Contact Lenses on Corneal Cells

To assess, in vitro, the effect of the release of contact lens multipurpose solutions (MPS) from two silicone hydrogel lenses on human corneal epithelial cells. A monolayer of immortalized human corneal epithelial cells was seeded in a 24-well plate in keratinocyte serum-free medium. Lotrafilcon A (LA) and balafilcon A (BA) lenses were placed on top of the adherent cells for 8 and 24 h, after being soaked in MPS, borate-buffered (Unisol) or phosphate-buffered saline overnight. Cells were assayed for viability using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay or for α3, β1, and β4 integrin expression and caspase activation by flow cytometry. After 8 h, LA lenses soaked in Unisol, Opti-Free Express (OFX), and ReNu MultiPlus (ReNu) showed decrease in cell viability. LA and BA soaked in Complete Moisture Plus (Complete) had similar viability at around 85% of control. After 24 h, a further decrease in viability was observed with all MPS-soaked lenses; LA soaked in OFX significantly reduced viability compared with Unisol-soaked lenses. In addition, reduced levels of integrin expression for lenses soaked in OFX and ReNu, and for BA soaked in Complete were observed. At 24 h, only LA soaked in OFX led to an increase in caspase activation. Our results indicate an increase in cytotoxicity with borate-based MPS solutions in vitro when compared with both phosphate-buffered saline and borate-exposed lenses, suggesting that biocides and/or additives play a role in the observed cell reaction. Moreover, the mechanism of in vitro solution-induced toxicity appeared to be mediated by lens type, suggesting differences in the preferential adsorption/release profile of certain compounds.

Lens material and formulation of multipurpose solutions affects contact lens disinfection

To assess the disinfection efficacy of multipurpose solutions (MPS) against different bacterial species adhered either to silicon hydrogel or to conventional hydrogel contact lenses (CLs). The influences of the MPS formulation and the chemical composition of the lens material were investigated. This investigation followed the standard 14729, which establishes the guidelines for assessing CL disinfecting solutions. Two commercially available (Opti-Free(®) Express(®) and Renu(®) Multiplus) solutions and one recalled solution (Complete(®) MoisturePlus™) were used in this study. After disinfection, the number of survivors was estimated by the colony forming units' method. The lens material appears to influence disinfection. The conventional hydrogel polymacon exhibited the highest disinfection scores, a fact that should be related with the lack of electrostatic attraction towards the biocides and its hydrophilicity. The MPS formulation appears to have influence in disinfection efficacy as well. For most adhered bacteria, Opti-Free(®) was capable of reducing cell concentration in 4-log. Disinfection results from multivariate factors and this study confirmed that the lens material and the MPS play a very important role in the disinfection efficacy of CL.

Evaluations of Shorter Exposures of Contact Lens Cleaning Solutions against Fusarium oxysporum Species Complex and Fusarium solani Species Complex To Simulate Inappropriate Usage

An outbreak of Fusarium keratitis in contact lens users resulted in withdrawal of ReNu with MoistureLoc solution, although the exact cause of the outbreak remains enigmatic. We evaluated current and discontinued multipurpose cleaning solutions (MPSs; MoistureLoc, Equate, MultiPlus, and OptiFree Express) against plankton- and biofilm-derived cells of Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC) and F. solani species complex (FSSC). The methods included a traditional assay based on CFU counts and a novel flow cytometry (FC) assay based on percent cell subpopulation (PCS) stained with two fluorochromes (Sytox Red and 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate). The tests were done with the respective manufacturers' recommended cleaning regimens (240 to 360 min) and under shorter exposures (15 to 60 min) to simulate inappropriate usage by the customers. FC assay measured PCS, which was available rapidly, in 5 to 7 h, whereas 24 to 48 h was needed for CFU counts, and there was good correlation between the two methods (r2=0.97). FC assays allowed identification of injured fungal cells, which are likely to be missed with growth assays. In general, a time- and inoculum-dependent survival pattern was seen for both FOSC and FSSC cells, and biofilm-derived cells were more resistant than plankton-derived cells. MultiPlus and Equate produced 100% sterilization of fungi even under shorter exposures. However, biofilm FOSC and FSSC cells survived for up to 4 h in MoistureLoc solution and up to 6 h in OptiFree Express solution under shorter exposure times. This finding was enigmatic, as OptiFree Express is not associated with any outbreak of Fusarium keratitis. This study provides additional support for possible roles that improper lens cleaning regimens and fungal biofilms could play as predisposing factors for Fusarium keratitis.

Comparative evaluation of multi-purpose solutions in the stabilization of tear lysozyme

The range and extent of tear proteins removed by various multi-purpose solutions has been investigated, but there is little information in the literature about their ability to prevent denaturation of tear proteins, particularly lysozyme. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of Bausch + Lomb Biotrue™ multi-purpose solution and other care solutions to affect denaturation of lysozyme using a lysozyme activity assay. The test solutions used were: Biotrue multi-purpose solution, Bausch + Lomb renu ® fresh™, formerly ReNu MultiPlus ®, Alcon OPTI-FREE RepleniSH, Alcon OPTI-FREE EXPRESS, CIBA VISION AQuify, and AMO COMPLETE Multi-Purpose Solution Easy Rub Formula. A phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution served as a control. The test and control solutions containing lysozyme were exposed to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a known denaturant of the enzyme. The assay was based on digestion of the cell wall of Micrococcus luteus in a suspension, a substrate sensitive to active lysozyme. Enzymatic activity against M. luteus was used to assess activity of lysozyme. The decrease in the turbidity of the cell wall suspension, a measure of relative enzyme activity, was determined by following the decrease in absorbance (at 450 nm) over time using a spectrophotometer. Statistically significant greater stabilization of lysozyme was observed with Biotrue multi-purpose solution and renu fresh than with OPTI-FREE RepleniSH, OPTI-FREE EXPRESS, AQuify, COMPLETE Multi-Purpose Solution Easy Rub Formula, and a PBS control. The lysozyme activity assay revealed that Biotrue multi-purpose solution and renu fresh have the ability to stabilize lysozyme under conditions that typically denature the protein.

Effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution on human corneal epithelial barrier function

Purpose To explore the effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution (MPS) on the junction protein distribution and barrier function of cultured human corneal epithelial cell monolayers. Methods Cultured human corneal epithelial cells (HCEpiC) were exposed to a novel MPS (MPS A; Biotrue™, Bausch & Lomb) at 50%, 75% and 100% for 10 or 30 min. Four commercially available MPS products, MPS B (AQuify, Ciba Vision), MPS C (COMPLETE MPS Easy Rub, AMO), MPS D (OPTI-FREE Express, Alcon) and MPS E (OPTI-FREE RepleniSH, Alcon) were tested in parallel. Tight junction structure and integrity were evaluated by confocal microscopy using ZO-1 antibody and scanning microscopy (SEM). Quantitative evaluation of MPSs on epithelial barrier function was determined by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) across HCEpiC grown on Transwell Clear permeable supports and on electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) electrode arrays. Results Overall after exposure to the three concentrations (50%, 75%, and 100%) of MPS A, ZO-1 distribution and fluorescent intensity on the cell surface appeared similar to the media control with continuous tight junctions and clear intercellular junctions. At all measured time points after exposure to MPS A (50% or 75%) there was also no effect on the TEER using both resistance methodologies, and SEM showed that MPS A appeared similar to the Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) control. In cells exposed to MPS D there was a dose-dependent change in the distribution of ZO-1, some cell detachment, and a decrease in monolayer resistance at all time points measured. Ultrastructurally, MPS D caused gross changes, including damage to cell junctions and plasma membranes. To a lesser extent, the remaining three commercial MPS products demonstrated some effects on tight junction ZO-1 distribution and/or TEER. Conclusions Based on the in vitro measurements of tight junction protein expression, monolayer integrity, and transepithelial electrical resistance, the novel multipurpose contact lens solution (MPS A) did not alter corneal barrier function as compared to media, PBS or HBSS control. Clinical significance of the observed differences in epithelial barrier function among the MPSs tested needs further investigation.