The war in Ukraine pushed a large part of the planet to reformulate its narratives, its arguments and rationalities to accommodate an impossible reality: a real, hot war in the European mainland where everybody had already embraced the mantra of a for-ever post-war-scenario. With the politicians re-using old and highly symbolical expressions, all of us were driven in the middle of a semantic turmoil. One year after, we may easily distinguish the opposite camps all around the world and the line between them drawn by the new, post-communist source of dissonances: the bare ideology covered in fluid, transparent inter-textual coats, as if the war itself were just a synthesis of history, geopolitics, religion, modernization and international relations altogether. However, beyond all these, there comes a well-known theory to seek its own updates: Julien Benda labeled three types of hatred, namely of race, class and nation. My claim is that this war in Ukraine added a full-fledged new category of ideological hatred, cutting across the above mentioned ones as if annulling their existence and subordinating all to the present commands of politics. I intend to explore these divisions, tracing a line to connect all four types while searching for the anatomy of the new (old) ghost: the ideological hatred, how it works with the sociological categories of race, class and nation encapsulating them to create new political subjects. The latter are the combating parts in this war and we may say that the war renovated the sociological division of roles through reconfiguring the players in the game.