Opioid-sparing Pain Management Research Articles

Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine in place of rectus sheath catheters to provide non-opiate analgesia after laparotomy: a quality improvement project to reduce the need for ongoing nursing input

Opioid-sparing pain management is an integral component of enhanced recovery after colonic and rectal surgery. In our hospital, rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are routinely placed during emergency laparotomy for colorectal...

Impact of Opioid Use on Duration of Therapy and Overall Survival for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have significantly improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the effect of opioid use on outcomes in patients receiving ICI either alone or with chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective review of 209 patients with advanced NSCLC who received an ICI at the University of Virginia between 1 February 2015 and 1 January 2020. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the impact of opioid use on duration of therapy (DOT) and overall survival (OS). Patients with no or low opioid use (n = 172) had a median DOT of 12.2 months (95% CI: 6.9-17.4) compared to 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.8-2.0) for those with high opioid use (n = 37, HR 0.26 95% CI: 0.17-0.40, p < 0.001). Patients with no or low opioid use had a median OS of 22.6 months (95% CI: 14.8-30.4) compared to 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.9) for those with high opioid use (HR 0.26 95% CI: 0.17-0.40 p < 0.001). High opioid use was associated with a shorter DOT and worse OS. This difference remained significant when accounting for possible confounding variables. These data warrant investigation of possible mechanistic interactions between opioids, tumor progression, and ICIs, as well as prospective evaluation of opioid-sparing pain management strategies, where possible.

Ketamine Applications for Migraines: A Scoping Narrative Review

In the United States alone, nearly 40 million children and adults suffer from migraines, which are the primary cause of morbidity, quality of life reduction, and loss of productivity for persons aged 15-49. Despite their global prevalence and various available treatment options, these disabilities are often still under-treated due to the individuality of treatment regimens and effect profiles. Compelling arguments have been made for ketamine use in opioid-sparing pain management. An increase in opioid stewardship, especially during the outbreak of the novel COVID-19, has only accentuated arguments for ketamine in migraine alleviation. However, within the last 20 years, the overall body of work addressing its role has not been clearly elucidated, with variations in optimal dosage and administration routes. Thus, this review aims to consolidate previous findings of ketamine as a migraine analgesic agent and to amass the most recent burgeoning data on its effectiveness in clinical settings. A comparison of intravenous, intranasal, and subcutaneous ketamine is examined, with a discussion on pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and results in pain outcomes analyzed.

A systematic review of patient-centered interventions for improving pain outcomes and reducing opioid-related risks in acute care settings.

This systematic review evaluates the literature for patient-oriented opioid and pain educational interventions that aim to optimize pain management using opioid-sparing approaches in the orthopaedic trauma population. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021234006). A review of English-language publications in CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase.com, PsycInfo (EBSCO), and Web of Science Core Collection literature databases published between 1980 and February 2021 was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Only studies implementing patient-oriented opioid and/or pain education in adult patients receiving acute orthopaedic care were eligible. Outcomes were required to include postinterventional opioid utilization, postoperative analgesia and amount, or patient-reported pain outcomes. A total of 480 abstracts were reviewed, and 8 publications were included in the final analysis. Two reviewers independently extracted data from selected studies using a standardized data collection form. Disagreements were addressed by a third reviewer. Quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Descriptive statistics characterized study findings, and content analysis was used to discern themes across studies. Our findings indicate the merit for patient-centered educational interventions including verbal/written/audio-visual trainings paired with multimodal approaches to target opioid-sparing pain management and reduce short-term pain scores in urgent and acute care settings after acute orthopaedic injuries. The scarcity of published literature warrants further rigorously designed studies to substantiate the benefit of patient-centric education in reducing prolonged opioid utilization and associated risks after orthopaedic trauma. Therapeutic level III.

Economic Outcomes and Incidence of Postsurgical Hypotension With Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries.

Background: Epidural analgesia can be associated with high costs and postsurgical risks such as hypotension, despite its widespread use and value in providing opioid-sparing pain management. We tested the hypothesis that liposomal bupivacaine (LB) might be a reliable alternative to epidural analgesia in this real-world study.Objectives: To compare economic outcomes and hypotension incidence associated with use of LB and epidural analgesia for abdominal surgery.Methods: This retrospective analysis identified records of adults who underwent abdominal surgeries between January 2016 and September 2019 with either LB administration or traditional epidural analgesia using the Premier Healthcare Database. Economic outcomes included length of stay, hospital costs, rates of discharge to home, and 30-day hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postsurgical hypotension and vasopressor use. Subgroup analyses were stratified by surgical procedure (colorectal, abdominal) and approach (endoscopic, open). A generalized linear model adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics was used for all comparisons.Results: A total of 5799 surgical records (LB, n=4820; epidural analgesia, n=979) were included. Compared with cases where LB was administered, cases of epidural analgesia use were associated with a 1.6-day increase in length of stay (adjusted rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 [1.2-1.3]]; P<.0001) and $6304 greater hospital costs (adjusted rate ratio [95% CI], 1.2 [1.2-1.3]]; P<.0001). Cost differences were largely driven by room-and-board fees. Epidural analgesia was associated with reduced rates of discharge to home (P<.0001) and increased 30-day readmission rates (P=.0073) compared with LB. Epidural analgesia was also associated with increased rates of postsurgical hypotension (30% vs 11%; adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 2.8 [2.3-3.4]; P<.0001) and vasopressor use (22% vs 7%; adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 3.1 [2.5-4.0]; P<.0001) compared with LB. Subgroup analyses by surgical procedure and approach were generally consistent with overall comparisons.Discussion: Our results are consistent with previous studies that demonstrated epidural analgesia can be associated with higher utilization of healthcare resources and complications compared with LB.Conclusions: Compared with epidural analgesia, LB was associated with economic benefits and reduced incidence of postsurgical hypotension and vasopressor use.

Economic Outcomes and Incidence of Postsurgical Hypotension With Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries

Background: Epidural analgesia can be associated with high costs and postsurgical risks such as hypotension, despite its widespread use and value in providing opioid-sparing pain management. We tested the hypothesis that liposomal bupivacaine (LB) might be a reliable alternative to epidural analgesia in this real-world study. Objectives: To compare economic outcomes and hypotension incidence associated with use of LB and epidural analgesia for abdominal surgery. Methods: This retrospective analysis identified records of adults who underwent abdominal surgeries between January 2016 and September 2019 with either LB administration or traditional epidural analgesia using the Premier Healthcare Database. Economic outcomes included length of stay, hospital costs, rates of discharge to home, and 30-day hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postsurgical hypotension and vasopressor use. Subgroup analyses were stratified by surgical procedure (colorectal, abdominal) and approach (endoscopic, open). A generalized linear model adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics was used for all comparisons. Results: A total of 5799 surgical records (LB, n=4820; epidural analgesia, n=979) were included. Compared with cases where LB was administered, cases of epidural analgesia use were associated with a 1.6-day increase in length of stay (adjusted rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 [1.2-1.3]]; P&lt;.0001) and $6304 greater hospital costs (adjusted rate ratio [95% CI], 1.2 [1.2-1.3]]; P&lt;.0001). Cost differences were largely driven by room-and-board fees. Epidural analgesia was associated with reduced rates of discharge to home (P&lt;.0001) and increased 30-day readmission rates (P=.0073) compared with LB. Epidural analgesia was also associated with increased rates of postsurgical hypotension (30% vs 11%; adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 2.8 [2.3-3.4]; P&lt;.0001) and vasopressor use (22% vs 7%; adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 3.1 [2.5-4.0]; P&lt;.0001) compared with LB. Subgroup analyses by surgical procedure and approach were generally consistent with overall comparisons. Discussion: Our results are consistent with previous studies that demonstrated epidural analgesia can be associated with higher utilization of healthcare resources and complications compared with LB. Conclusions: Compared with epidural analgesia, LB was associated with economic benefits and reduced incidence of postsurgical hypotension and vasopressor use.

Minimizing Opioid Use After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparing Periarticular Injection Versus Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Versus a Combination Protocol

BackgroundEffective management of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be challenging. We sought to develop an opioid-sparing pain management pathway by comparing the relative effectiveness of 3 different protocols: (1) Local anesthetic administered patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) without intrathecal opioids; (2) Periarticular injection (PAI); and (3) PCEA + PAI. MethodsIn this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 180 patients undergoing THA were randomized to receive either (1) PCEA with 0.06% bupivacaine, (2) PAI, or (3) a PAI + PCEA with 0.06% bupivacaine. All patients received the same postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen. The primary outcome was opioid consumption, measured in oral morphine equivalents, at 24, 48, and 72 hours after anesthesia stop time. Secondary measures included pain at rest and with movement, opioid side effects, patient satisfaction, and quality of recovery, as assessed via standardized self-reporting scales and surveys. ResultsOpioid consumption was significantly higher in the PAI group in the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to the PAI + PCEA group (30 versus 15, P = .012). No differences were detected among groups for length of stay, pain scores, patient satisfaction, or duration of surgery. More patients in the PAI + PCEA group were opiate-free in the first 24 hours compared to PAI (23.7 versus 8.5%, P = .043). ConclusionUse of PAI + PCEA regimen was opioid-sparing in the first 24 hours after surgery, favoring this group when opioid reduction is desired. Increased drowsiness was noted in the subsequent 24 to 48 hours once the epidural catheter was removed and opioid consumption also increased.

Policy changes are needed to further reduce perioperative opioid use.

Opioid prescriptions in the perioperative setting are a known risk factor for long-term opioid use and misuse. Recent initiatives in the United States to address the issue have focused on judicious prescribing patterns and quality measurement to minimize opioid dispensing. However, policy gaps have limited the effectiveness of current interventions. Expanded policy considerations are warranted, including patient-focused opioid risk screening and preferences for nonopioid pain management, with broader plan coverage for multimodal opioid-sparing pain management (OSPM). Additionally, formalized clinician education regarding specific nonopioid pain management alternatives may increase utilization, as will incorporation into perioperative OSPM clinical pathways. It is also important for patients to have access to the option for multimodal OSPM in the perioperative setting without financial disincentives, which may arise in surgery-specific bundled payment models. Finally, expansion of research activities regarding clinical and cost-efficacy outcomes may help to advance use of these options, laying the groundwork for development of a broader set of quality measures reflecting utilization and outcomes of multimodal OSPM in the perioperative setting.

Multimodal opioid-sparing pain management for emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: a quality improvement project

BackgroundOpioid-sparing multimodal analgesic approach has been shown to provide effective postoperative pain relief and reduce postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-associated adverse effects. While many studies have evaluated analgesic strategies for elective cesarean delivery, few studies have investigated analgesic approaches in emergent cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia. The primary aim of this quality improvement project is to evaluate opioid consumption with the use of a multimodal opioid-sparing pain management pathway in patients undergoing emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia.MethodsSeventy-two women (age > 16 years) undergoing emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia before (n = 36) and after (n = 36) implementation of a multimodal opioid-sparing pain management pathway were included. All patients received a standardized general anesthetic. Prior to implementation of the pathway, postoperative pain management was primarily limited to intravenous patient-controlled opioid administration. The new multimodal pathway included scheduled acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications and ultrasound-guided classic lateral transversus abdominis plane blocks with postoperative opioids reserved only for rescue analgesia. Data obtained from electronic records included demographics, intraoperative opioid use, and pain scores and opioid consumption upon arrival to the recovery room, at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively.ResultsPatients receiving multimodal opioid sparing analgesia (AFTER group) had lower opioid use for 72 h, postoperatively. Only 2 of the 36 patients (5.6%) in the AFTER group required intravenous opioids through patient-controlled analgesia while 30 out of 36 patients (83.3%) in the BEFORE group required intravenous opioids.ConclusionsMultimodal opioid-sparing analgesia is associated with reduced postoperative opioid consumption after emergent cesarean delivery.

Opioid Requirements After Intercostal Cryoanalgesia in Thoracic Surgery

The optimal approach to pain management after thoracic surgery remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between intercostal nerve cryoanalgesia and postoperative opioid requirements after thoracic surgery. We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent unilateral thoracic surgery for pulmonary pathology from June 2017 to August 2019. Patients receiving intercostal nerve cryoanalgesia were compared with standard analgesia. The primary outcome was total oral morphine equivalent consumption during hospitalization, at discharge, and 90 d postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and pulmonary function measured on postoperative days 1 and 3, at discharge, and postoperative complications. Planned subgroup analysis by opioid exposure and surgical approach was performed. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test demonstrated significantly less inpatient opioid use for cryoanalgesia patients (45 versus 305mg, P<0.001), regardless of opioid history (naïve: 22.5 versus 209.8mg, P<0.001; tolerant: 159.5 versus 1043mg, P<0.001) and minimally invasive approach (opioid naïve: 26.2 versus 209.8mg, P<0.001; tolerant: 158.5 versus 1059mg, P<0.001). Opioid-naïve patients required fewer discharge opioids (50 versus 168mg; P<0.05). Cryoanalgesia lowered daily pain scores (P<0.001) and showed a trend toward lower 90-d opioid prescriptions and higher pulmonary function scores. There was no difference in postoperative complications (P=0.31). Our results suggest an association between intercostal nerve cryoanalgesia and reduced inpatient opioid requirements and pain in opioid-naïve and tolerant patients. Pulmonary function, 90-d opioid prescriptions, and adverse events were no different between groups. It may serve as a useful adjunct for opioid-sparing pain management in thoracic surgery.

A multimodal opioid-sparing pain management following total knee replacement.

The purpose of this study is to compare the pain scores, opioid consumption, and range of motion of the operated knee after total knee replacement (TKR) in the 10-day follow-up period between a traditional opioid-containing pain management protocol and a multimodal opioid-sparing treatment protocol. This prospective, randomized, single-center study included 90 patients (24 men and 66 women; mean age 69.7±7.2 years) undergoing TKR for osteoarthritis between October 2019 and October 2020. Patients were randomized into 3 cohorts for comparison: traditional opioid-containing pain management protocol (n=30), multimodal opioid-sparing pain management protocol (n=30), and traditional opioid-containing pain management protocol with additional local infiltration analgesia (LIA). Changes in visual analog scale for pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and opioid consumption were compared between groups. A lower mean postoperative VAS score was observed in the opioid-sparing cohort, which was statistically significant at all time points compared with the traditional cohorts. Mean total morphine consumption was significantly lower in the opioid-sparing cohort (2.7±5.8 MMEs) compared to the traditional (14.0±14.8 MMEs) and traditional with LIA cohorts (8.3±9.5 MMEs; p<0.05). The mean degree of flexion of the operated knee of patients was significantly greater in patients in the opioid-sparing group than in the other groups on the postoperative day 3 (opioid-sparing: 87.0±11.2°; traditional: 74.1±11.6°; traditional with LIA: 84.7±8.9°; p<0.05), as well as on day 10 (opioid-sparing: 99.3±10.8°; traditional: 87.3±12.4°; traditional with LIA: 92.5±9.7°; p<0.05). The rate of adverse events after TKR did not differ between the groups. The results of this study suggest that a multimodal opioid-sparing pain protocol after TKR, which includes oral non-opioid medications and periarticular injection with bupivacaine, provides better pain relief and early functional gains with fewer rescue opioids compared to traditional opioid-based protocols (Tab. 4, Fig. 2, Ref. 22).

Opioid-sparing Strategies in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Introduction:Pain and discomfort are frequently experienced following mastectomy with concomitant breast implant- or tissue expander-based alloplastic breast reconstruction (AlBR). Unfortunately, postoperative opioids have decreased efficacy in AlBR, short-term complication profiles, and are fraught by long-term dependence. This systematic review aims to identify opioid-sparing pain management strategies in AlBR.Methods:A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register was performed in September 2018. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107911). The search identified 1184 articles. Inclusion criteria were defined as patients 18 years or older undergoing AlBR.Results:Fourteen articles were identified assessing opioid-sparing strategies in AlBR. This literature included articles evaluating enhanced recovery protocols (two), intercostal blocks (two), paravertebral blocks (four), liposomal bupivacaine (three), diclofenac (one), and local anesthesia infusion pumps (two). The literature included five randomized trials and nine cohort studies. Study characteristics, bias (low to high risk), and reporting outcomes were extensively heterogeneous between articles. Qualitative analysis suggests reduced opioid utilization in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, paravertebral blocks, and use of liposomal bupivacaine.Conclusions:A variety of opioid-sparing strategies are described for pain management in AlBR. Multimodal analgesia should be provided via ERAS pathways as they appear to reduce pain and spare opioid use. Targeted paravertebral blocks and liposomal bupivacaine field blocks appear to be beneficial in sparing opioids and should be considered as essential components of ERAS protocols. Additional prospective, randomized trials are necessary to delineate the efficacy of other studied modalities.

Multimodal opioid-sparing pain management after lung transplantation and the impact of liposomal bupivacaine intercostal nerve block.

Opioid analgesics are commonly used post-lung transplant, but have many side effects and are associated with worse outcomes. We conducted a retrospective review of all lung transplant recipients who were treated with a multimodal opioid-sparing pain protocol. The use of liposomal bupivacaine intercostal nerve block was variable due to hospital restrictions. The primary objective was to describe opioid requirements and patient-reported pain scores early post-lung transplant and to assess the impact of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine intercostal nerve block. We treated 64 lung transplant recipients with our protocol. Opioid utilization decreased to a mean of 43 milligram oral morphine equivalents by postoperative day 4. Median pain scores peaked at 4 on postoperative day 1 and decreased thereafter. Only three patients were discharged home with opioids, all of whom were taking opioid agonist therapy pre-transplant for opioid use disorder. Patients who received liposomal bupivacaine intercostal nerve block in the operating room had a significant reduction in opioid consumption over postoperative day 1 through 4 (228mg vs. 517mg, P=.032). A multimodal opioid-sparing pain management protocol is feasible and resulted in weaning of opioids prior to hospital discharge.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Virtual Reality as a Pain Management Modality in Academic, Community, and Safety-Net Settings: Qualitative Analysis.

BackgroundPrior studies have shown that virtual reality (VR) is an efficacious treatment modality for opioid-sparing pain management. However, the majority of these studies were conducted among primarily White, relatively advantaged populations and in well-resourced settings.ObjectiveWe conducted a qualitative, theory-informed implementation science study to assess the readiness for VR in safety-net settings.MethodsUsing the theoretical lens of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework, we conducted semistructured interviews with current VR users and nonusers based in safety-net health systems (n=15). We investigated barriers and facilitators to a commercially available, previously validated VR technology platform AppliedVR (Los Angeles, CA, USA). We used deductive qualitative analysis using the overarching domains of the CFIR framework and performed open, inductive coding to identify specific themes within each domain.ResultsInterviewees deemed the VR intervention to be useful, scalable, and an appealing alternative to existing pain management approaches. Both users and nonusers identified a lack of reimbursement for VR as a significant challenge for adoption. Current users cited positive patient feedback, but safety-net stakeholders voiced concern that existing VR content may not be relevant or appealing to diverse patients. All respondents acknowledged the challenge of integrating and maintaining VR in current pain management workflows across a range of clinical settings, and this adoption challenge was particularly acute, given resource and staffing constraints in safety-net settings.ConclusionsVR for pain management holds interest for frontline pain management clinicians and leadership in safety-net health settings but will require significant tailoring and adaption to address the needs of diverse populations. Integration into complex workflows for pain management is a significant barrier to adoption, and participants cited structural cost and reimbursement concerns as impediments to initial implementation and scaling of VR use.

Perioperative Pain Management Issues Unique to Older Adults Undergoing Surgery: A Narrative Review.

The older population is growing and with this growth there is a parallel rise in the operations performed on this vulnerable group. The perioperative pain management strategy for older adults is unique and requires a team-based approach for provision of high-quality surgical care. Literature search was performed using PubMed in addition to review of relevant protocols and guidelines from geriatric, surgical, and anesthesia societies. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized trials, observational studies, and society guidelines were summarized in this review. The optimal approach to a pain management strategy for older adults undergoing surgery involves addressing all phases of perioperative care. For example, preoperative assessment of a patient's cognitive function and presence of chronic pain may impact the pain management plan. Consideration should be also given to intraoperative strategies to improve pain control and minimize both the dose and side effects from opioids (e.g. regional anesthetic techniques). Postoperative pain control (e.g. under or over treatment of pain) may impact the development of elderly-specific complications such as postoperative delirium and functional decline. Finally, pain management does not stop after the older adult patient leaves the hospital. Both discharge planning and post-operative clinic follow-up provide important opportunities for collaboration and intervention. An opioid-sparing pain management strategy for older adults can be accomplished with a comprehensive and collaborative interdisciplinary strategy addressing all phases of perioperative care.

Efficacy of an opioid-sparing analgesic protocol in pain control after less invasive cranial neurosurgery.

Opioid overuse in postoperative patients is a worrisome trend, and potential alternatives exist which warrant investigation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in treating postoperative cranial surgery pain has been hampered by concern for inadequate pain control and increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. A safe and effective alternative to opioid-based pain management is critical to improving postoperative care. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether an NSAID-based opioid-sparing pain management protocol (OSP) is effective in analgesic control of less invasive cranial surgery patients at 6-, 12-, and 24-hour postoperatively. Secondary aims included investigating differences in hemorrhagic complications. Five hundred sixty-six consecutive patients who underwent cranial surgery before and after implementation of the celecoxib-based OSP were eligible. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in each cohort. The opioid-sparing cohort had lower pain scores at 6 hours (3.45 vs 4.19, P = 0.036), 12 hours (3.21 vs 4.00, P = 0.006), and 24 hours (2.90 vs 3.59, P = 0.010). Rates of postoperative hemorrhage were not significantly different (5% intervention vs 8% control, P = 0.527). The opioid-sparing pain management protocol provided comparable or better pain control in the first 24 hours after less invasive cranial surgery. Hemorrhage rates did not change with the use of an NSAID-based OSP. An effective alternative to the current standard opioid-based pain management is feasible for less invasive cranial surgery. Determinations of hemorrhage risk and more complex cranial surgery will require larger prospective randomized trials.

"I Prefer to Stay Away": A Qualitative Study of Patients in an Opioid-Sparing Pain Management Protocol.

The aim of this study was to explore beliefs and behaviors of opioid pain medications among patients undergoing elective surgery. Opioid dependence after surgery is a major contributor to the ongoing opioid epidemic. Recent efforts by surgeons and health systems have sought to improve the education patients receive regarding safe opioid use after surgery; however, little is known about patients' pre-existing beliefs surrounding opioids. Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients who underwent 1 of 4 common elective surgical procedures at 1 institution. Patients were specifically asked about their knowledge and beliefs about opioids before surgery and their opinions of opioid-sparing recovery after surgery. Coding was conducted through iterative steps, beginning with an initial cycle of rapid analysis, followed by focused coding, and thematic analysis. Twenty-one patients were interviewed. Three major themes emerged regarding patient opinions about using opioids after surgery. First, there was widespread awareness among patients about opioid medications, and preoperatively, patients had specific intentions about using opioids, often informed by this awareness. Second, patients described a spectrum of opioid related behavior which both aligned and conflicted with preoperative intentions. Third, there was tension among patients about opioid-free postoperative recovery, with patients expressing support, opposition, and emphasis on tailoring recovery to patient needs. Patients undergoing common surgical procedures often arrive at their surgical encounter with strong, pre-formed opinions about opioids. Eliciting these preexisting opinions may help surgeons better counsel patients about safe opioid use after surgery.

Impact of Postoperative Opioid Use on 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes in Knee Surgery Patients.

The purposes of this study were to identify the patient characteristics associated with refilling a postoperative opioid prescription after knee surgery and to determine whether refilling opioids is associated with 2-year patient-reported outcomes. We hypothesized that postoperative refill of opioids would be associated with worse 2-year patient-reported outcomes. We studied 192 patients undergoing knee surgery at a single urban academic institution. Patients completed multiple patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively, including six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, numeric pain scale scores for the operative knee and the rest of the body, Marx Activity Rating Scale, as well as measures of met expectations, improvement, and satisfaction. Total morphine equivalents (TMEs) were calculated from a regional prescription monitoring program. Patients who refilled a postoperative opioid prescription were compared with those who did not, and TMEs were calculated for those who refilled (Refill TMEs). One hundred twenty-nine patients (67%) refilled at least one postoperative opioid prescription. Black race, older age, higher average body mass index (BMI), smoking, greater medical comorbidities, preoperative opioid use, lower income, government insurance, and knee arthroplasty were associated with refilling opioids. Greater Refill TMEs was associated with black or white race, older age, higher average BMI, smoking, greater medical comorbidities, preoperative opioid use, government insurance, and unemployment. Refilling opioids and greater Refill TMEs were associated with worse postoperative scores on most patient-reported outcome measures 2 years after knee surgery. However, refilling opioids and greater Refill TMEs did not have a significant association with improvement after surgery. Multivariable analysis controlling for potential confounding variables confirmed that greater postoperative Refill TMEs independently predicted worse 2-year PROMIS Physical Function, 2-year PROMIS Pain Interference, and 2-year IKDC knee function scores. Postoperative refill of opioids was associated with worse 2-year patient-reported outcomes in a dose-dependent fashion. These findings reinforce the importance of counseling patients regarding opioid use and optimizing opioid-sparing pain management postoperatively.

Acupuncture As a Potential Opioid-Sparing Pain Management Intervention for Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment.

Background: High-symptom burdens, including pain, are associated with high-dose chemotherapy. Objective: We conducted a pilot study to evaluate how acupuncture may affect symptom burden and use of pain medication. Design: This is a randomized sham acupuncture (SA) controlled trial. Setting: An academic cancer center. Patients: Patients were with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Intervention: Once daily acupuncture for 5 days after high-dose chemotherapy. Main Outcome Measures: M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), opioid use. Results: Compared with SA, true acupuncture reduced nausea, poor appetite, and drowsiness, and use of opioids in opioid-naive patients. Randomizations: Yes. Blinding: Investigators and study participants were blinded. Conclusion: Further study of acupuncture in a larger trial is warranted for its effect on reducing opioid use and symptom burdens during high-dose chemotherapy. Registration: NCT01811862.

Evaluating Pain, Opioids, and Delirium in Critically Ill Older Adults.

Untreated pain and pain management with opioids are independent precipitating factors for delirium. This retrospective study evaluated the relationships among pain severity, its management with opioids, and the onset of delirium in older adult patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Consecutive patients aged 65 or greater admitted to the SICU over a 5-month period were examined (n = 172). When assessed using a multivariable general estimating equation model, opioids (chi-square [χ2], 12.34, p = .0004), but not pain (χ2, 3.31, p = .0688) were significant in predicting next-day delirium status. Controlling for pain, patients exposed to opioids were 2.5 times more likely to develop delirium than patients not exposed (95% Confidence Interval: 1.44-4.36). Our data shows that opioid administration predicted the onset of next-day delirium. In an effort to prevent delirium, future research should focus on opioid-sparing pain management approaches to mitigate pain and delirium.