Opioid-sparing Effect Research Articles

Nonopioid Drugs for Postoperative Pain: A Selection Governed by Choices of the Authors of Academic Articles

The opioid crisis has profoundly changed the interest in using nonopioid analgesics. This review identified nonopioid drugs receiving the most interest in the treatment of postoperative pain. Publication-based interest, which reflects the authors’ choices of subjects for academic articles, was used to show the shifts in their interest. The authors’ choices of a particular drug for an article’s subject were regarded as reflective of the collective opinion of experts most knowledgeable on the subject. The frequency with which a drug was the topic of an article was measured with the use of specific bibliometric indices. They were employed to select nonopioid drugs for this review. These included acetaminophen, dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, ketamine, gabapentin, ibuprofen, ketorolac, diclofenac, magnesium sulfate, clonidine, intravenous lidocaine, and meloxicam (in order of most to least bibliometric interest). Individual reviews on these agents described how the bibliometric indices characterized a drug. They also addressed the question of whether a nonopioid analgesic produced a marked opioid-sparing effect. Information relative to this question was presented via the results of meta-analyses with emphasis on the possible reduction of opioid-related side effects. Overall, nonopioid drugs demonstrating the largest popularity among authors and continuous interest growth in 2018-2022 include acetaminophen, dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and ibuprofen. The relevant meta-analyses show that nonopioids, administered as components of multimodal analgesia, provided the opioid-sparing effect; they also show that the most common change in the opioid-related side effects was a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

A Framework for a New Paradigm of Opioid Drug Tapering Using Adjunct Drugs.

The misuse of and dependency on prescription opioids represents a significant crisis at the national level, impacting not only the health of the public but also the societal and economic well-being. There is a critical need for strategies to reduce the dosage of prescribed opioids to limit opioid-associated adverse effects and lower the risk of addiction development in patients experiencing chronic pain. Opioid-sparing medications, when co-administered with opioids, enable a reduced opioid dose without loss of efficacy. This suggests the potential for using opioid adjunct drugs in opioid tapering, whereby opioid doses are lowered incrementally in a systematic manner to improve a patient's safety profile or quality of life. The objective of this report is two-fold: 1) to illustrate the potential for adjunct drugs in opioid tapering, and 2) to describe the steps needed to be taken to develop a framework for the use of adjunct drugs in opioid tapering. This can provide the impetus for further investigation into opioid tapering and the development of improved clinical care. The proposed project implements knowledge synthesis methods to develop the framework for a new paradigm of opioid drug tapering that incorporates opioid dosage reductions with adjunct drugs. Framework development is organized into three major phases: 1) Adjunct drug characterization, 2) Assessment of the opioid-sparing effect, and 3) Usability of data for clinicians. The knowledge gained from this project can provide a foundation for improved analgesia protocols for opioids and adjunctive drug therapy.

Comparison of thoracic epidural catheter and continuous peripheral infusion for management of traumatic rib fracture pain.

Thoracic epidural catheters (TECs) are useful adjuncts to multimodal pain regimens in traumatic rib fractures. However, TEC placement is limited by contraindications, patient risk profile, and provider availability. Continuous peripheral infusion of ketamine and/or lidocaine is an alternative that has a modest risk profile and few contraindications. We hypothesized that patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures receiving TECs would have better pain control, in terms of daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and mean pain scores (MPSs) when compared with continuous peripheral infusions of ketamine and/or lidocaine. We retrospectively analyzed traumatic rib fracture admissions to a level 1 trauma center between January 2018 and December 2020. We evaluated two treatment groups: TEC only and continuous infusion only (drip only). A linear mixed-effects model evaluated the association of MME with treatment group. An interaction term of treatment group by time (days 1-7) was included to allow estimating potential time-dependent treatment effect on MME. A zero-inflated Poisson mixed-effects model evaluated the association of treatment with MPS. Both models adjusted for confounders. A total of 1,647 patients were included. After multivariable analysis, a significant, time-varying dose-response relationship between treatment group and MME was found, indicating an opioid-sparing effect favoring the TEC-only group. The opioid-sparing benefit for TEC-only therapy was most prominent at day 3 (27.4 vs 36.5 MME) and day 4 (27.3 vs 36.2 MME) (p < 0.01). The drip-only group had 1.21 times greater MPS than patients with TEC only (p < 0.001). Drip-only analgesia is associated with higher daily MME use and MPS, compared with TEC only. The maximal benefit of TEC therapy appears to be on days 3 and 4. Prospective, randomized comparison between groups is necessary to evaluate the magnitude of the treatment effect. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Assessing the Efficacy of Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbosacral Spine Surgery: A Prospective Quasi-experimental Study.

Background and aims Optimal postoperative care and analgesia are the key factors in the management of cases of lumbosacral spine surgery. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently evolving entity and has a dynamic role in postoperative pain management. However, its role in the management of pain in lumber spinal surgeries is still not clear, and the literature remains anecdotal. Therefore, we planned to study the efficacy of ultrasound-guided preoperative ESP block at the T12 level using levobupivacaine for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgeries. Methods A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective or emergency lumbosacral spine surgery were divided into two groups - the GA group received standard general anesthesia (GA)and the GA+ESP group received standard general anesthesia along with ultra-sound guided ESP block at the T12 level with a bilateral injection of20 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine. Perioperative analgesia was assessed by total intra-operative fentanyl dose and frequency, intra-operative hemodynamic parameters, post-operative numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, time of first systemic rescue analgesia, tramadol usage, mobilization day, and hospital stay duration. Results Intraoperative fentanyl sparing was observed in 83% of the GA+ESP group compared to 33% in the GA group. Postoperative tramadol sparing was observed in 80% of the GA+ESP group compared to 26.7% of the GA group. Twenty-four-hour postoperative NRS scores >3/10 were observed in 20% of the GA+ ESP group compared to 73.3% of the GA group. Conclusion In this study, superior perioperative analgesia, opioid-sparing effect, and decreased requirement of postoperative rescue analgesia were observed with ESP block.

Mitigating the Opioid Epidemic: The Role of Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain Management-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence and Mechanisms

Background and Objectives: As the medical community seeks alternative pain management strategies, cannabinoids have emerged as a potential option. This review discusses the role of cannabinoids in chronic pain management and their potential as an alternative treatment in pain medicine, focusing on efficacy, safety, and possible opioid reduction. The objectives are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids in chronic pain management, explore their potential to reduce opioid use, and identify the mechanisms by which cannabinoids exert their analgesic effects. Additionally, the review seeks to highlight the clinical implications and limitations of using cannabinoids as an alternative to opioids. Methods: A comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis were conducted, focusing on studies from PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane, focusing on various types of studies. Data were extracted and analyzed to assess the efficacy, safety, and potential opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids. Mechanistic insights were also explored to understand how cannabinoids modulate pain. Results: Cannabinoids have shown efficacy in managing chronic pain, with evidence indicating their ability to reduce pain and improve quality of life. Studies suggest that cannabinoids can provide significant analgesic effects, although there is variability in efficacy across trials. Findings also show that Cannabinoids modulate pain through the endocannabinoid system, which plays a crucial role in pain perception and inflammation. Limitations: The variability in efficacy across studies suggests a need for standardized formulations and dosing regimens. Long-term effects of cannabinoid use are not fully understood, necessitating further research. More highquality trials are needed to confirm findings and address potential biases. Conclusion: Cannabinoids offer a promising alternative for chronic pain management, with the potential to mitigate the opioid epidemic. Integrating cannabinoids into clinical practice, guided by evidence-based protocols, can provide a safer and effective approach to chronic pain management

Superiority of opioid free anesthesia with regional block over opioid anesthesia with regional block in the quality of recovery after retroperitoneiscopic renal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Opioids are the main analgesic drugs used in the perioperative period, but they often have various adverse effects. Recent studies have shown that quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has an opioid sparing effect. The aim of this study was to further evaluate the effect of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) combined with regional block on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery. Sixty patients undergoing elective retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery were divided into the opioid-free anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block group (OFA group, N.=30) and opioid anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block group (OA group, N.=30) using the random number table method. The main outcome measures were the quality of recovery assessed by Quality of Recover-40 (QoR-40) at the 24th postoperative hour. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to ambulate, and time to readiness for discharge. The QoR-40 score on the first postoperative day was significantly higher in the OFA group than that in the OA group (175.41±6.74 vs. 165.07±4.55; P<0.05). OFA also significantly reduced postoperative pain (P<0.05) and morphine consumption at both the 24th and 48th postoperative hour (P<0.05), as well as time to ambulate, and time to readiness for discharge (P<0.05). OFA with regional block is superior to opioid anesthesia with regional block in the quality of recovery after retroperitoneiscopic renal surgery.

Ketamine Infusion for Reducing Post-Operative Pain and Opioid Use in Gynecological Surgery

This analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ketamine infusion for reducing post-operative pain and opioid use in gynecological surgeries. A comprehensive review of recent studies revealed that ketamine consistently demonstrates significant pain-reducing and opioid-sparing effects across various surgical contexts, including gynecological procedures. Sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine were found to be effective and well-tolerated. However, optimal dosing regimens and timing of administration specific to gynecological surgeries require further investigation. The analysis recommends conducting large-scale, procedure-specific trials to establish tailored protocols for different gynecological surgeries. Additionally, long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess the impact on chronic pain development and persistent opioid use. This analysis is significant for refining pain management strategies in gynecological surgeries, potentially improving patient outcomes and addressing opioid-related concerns. It underscores the need for more flexible regulations to facilitate ketamine's clinical use in this context.

Use of Muscle Relaxants for Acute Postoperative Pain: A Practical Review.

Skeletal muscle relaxants have emerged as a broad category of analgesic adjuncts, aiming to improve pain relief and reduce opioid reliance. These drugs induce muscle relaxation and reduce muscle spasms, and therefore, they are commonly used in surgical procedures involving muscle manipulation, such as abdominal surgery, breast surgery, and spine surgery. However, their analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effects are poorly explored. A scoping review of literature was performed with several electronic databases. We used a search string with a sequence of text words and word variants related to central muscle relaxants, pain management, postoperative pain, and specific muscle relaxants. Review of literature shows significant heterogeneity among the studies in terms of surgical procedures, patient populations, choice of muscle relaxant, and timing and duration of administration, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings and the ability for pooled analysis. Given the lack of evidence, we recommend that the use of skeletal muscle relaxants be reserved for patients in whom an optimal multimodal analgesic technique is not adequate. Also, there may be a limited role for these drugs in patients at high risk of postoperative pain undergoing surgical procedures with expected high opioid requirements. Due to the concerns of potential adverse effects, the decision to use muscle relaxants in vulnerable populations should be made carefully, weighing the benefits against the risks.

Preoperative Gabapentin for Pain Control: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernioplasty

PurposeThe perioperative use of gabapentin has been suggested to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption. However, there is a variation in clinical practice, the type of surgery and the administration time seem to be distinct between the available studies. We assess whether gabapentin administered before surgery reduces postoperative pain in patients who have undergone inguinal hernioplasty. DesignThis is a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial. MethodsSeventy-seven patients scheduled for inguinal hernioplasty were randomized in two groups to receive gabapentin (900 mg) or placebo in the perioperative period. The primary outcome was analgesia measured by visual analog scale up to 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes such as morphine consumption, nausea, headache, and sedation have been also described. FindingsPatients who received gabapentin had lower postoperative pain scores compared to the control group, P < .001. The postoperative morphine use was significantly lower in the gabapentin (5.3%) versus placebo group (74.4%), P < .001. No significant difference between groups was observed for the occurrence of adverse events. ConclusionsThe perioperative administration of gabapentin was effective in reducing postoperative pain and had an important effect in decreasing morphine use. Together, our data reveal a long-lasting opioid-sparing effect of gabapentin in patients who underwent inguinal hernioplasty.

Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Use for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in Cardiac Surgery-Single Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, is used as an adjunct to anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. One of its advantages is the opioid-sparing effect which can facilitate early extubation and recovery. When the ERAS cardiac society was set in 2017, our facility was already using the ERAS program, in which the "fast-track Anesthesia" was facilitated by the intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine. Our objective is to share our experience and investigate the potential impact of intraoperative dexmedetomidine use as a part of the ERAS program on patient outcomes in elective cardiac surgery. Materials and Methods: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Switzerland. The patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2018 were included in this analysis (n = 327). Regardless of the surgery type, all the patients received a standardized fast-track anesthesia protocol inclusive of dexmedetomidine infusion, reduced opioid dose, and parasternal nerve block. The primary outcome was the postoperative time when the criteria for extubation were met. Three groups were identified: group 0-(extubated in the operating room), group < 6 (extubated in less than 6 h), and group > 6 (extubated in >6 h). The secondary outcomes were adverse events, length of stay in ICU and in hospital, and total hospitalization costs. Results: Dexmedetomidine was well-tolerated, with no significant adverse events reported. Early extubation was performed in 187 patients (57%). Group 3 had a significantly longer length of stay in the ICU (median: 70 h vs. 25 h) and in hospital (17 vs. 12 days), and consequently higher total hospitalization costs (CHF 62,551 vs. 38,433) compared to the net data from the other two groups (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dexmedetomidine can be safely used as part of the opioid-sparing anesthesia protocol in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass with the potential to facilitate early extubation, shorter ICU and hospital stays, and reduced hospitalization costs.

Use of regional anesthesia within a pediatric interventional radiology suite reduced periprocedural opioid use without delaying the overall workflow: a retrospective study

BackgroundNerve block utility has been extensively described in the operating room, however, there is a paucity of evidence regarding blocks in the interventional radiology (IR) suite, with no studies examining...

Medical marijuana in the treatment of cancer-associated symptoms.

Previous cancer studies have indicated that medical marijuana addresses a significant unmet need, namely chronic pain treatment and conferring oncology supportive care. However, the clinical research evaluating medical marijuana is preliminary and requires further consideration. We conducted a PubMed search primarily comprising retrospective and prospective studies, systematic reviews, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from approximately 2020-2023. The search included specific terms that incorporated medical marijuana, cancer treatment, cancer-related symptoms, pain management, and side effects. A total of 40 studies were included in the review, many of which were either of acceptable or good quality. Select investigations indicated that medical marijuana was associated with decreased overall pain levels and improvements in nausea and vomiting. Alternatively, the results from RCTs have found that the benefits from a placebo were equivalent to medical marijuana in both the treatment of cancer-related pain and providing an opioid-sparing effect. Despite the potential cancer-related benefits derived from medical marijuana, the study design and results for many of the investigations on which the evidence is based, were neither uniform nor conducted via RCTs; hence, the efficacy and appropriateness of medical marijuana in treating cancer-related conditions remain indeterminate.

Opioid-sparing effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study

BackgroundThe erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a new analgesic method used in thoracic surgery. However, few studies have characterized their effects on perioperative opioid consumption. We aimed to evaluate the effects of ESPB on perioperative opioid consumption in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).MethodsThis was a randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial at a single-centre academic hospital. Eighty patients were scheduled for thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy by VATS for lung cancer. Forty participants were randomly assigned to ESPB or control group. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled postoperative analgesia. Perioperative opioid consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and adverse events were recorded.ResultsIntraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and static/dynamic VAS scores were significantly lower in the early hours after VATS in the ESPB group (p < 0.05) than the control group. No significant differences were observed in adverse effects between the two groups.ConclusionsESPB reduced intraoperative opioid consumption and early postoperative pain in patients undergoing VATS. Our findings support the view that ESPB is a safe and highly effective option for regional analgesia for VATS.Trial registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1800019335.

Perioperative Analgesic Effect of Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Breast Surgery: A Randomized Control Study at a Large Teaching Hospital in Ghana.

Background Pain after breast surgery has been described as moderate to severe in intensity and, if inadequately treated, increases postoperative morbidity, hospital cost, and the incidence of persistent postoperative pain. Serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is an interfascial injection technique for analgesia of the chest wall. There is a lack of data with regard to its analgesic and possible opioid-sparing effects in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to determine the perioperative analgesic effect of serratus anterior plane block administered for breast surgery. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study involving 52 patients and was randomized into the intervention (n = 26) and control (n = 26) groups. One patient in the control group did not receive the allocated intervention, while one in the intervention group lost to follow-up. Complete data of 50 participants, comprising intervention (n=25), was used in the analysis. Patients' demographic and health characteristics, pre-induction, intra-operative, and postoperative hemodynamic parameters were noted. After induction of anesthesia, a blinded anesthetist performed an ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block with 0.25% plain bupivacaine or a sham block using 0.9% normal saline (control). Numerical rating scale (NRS) score and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were recorded immediately after surgery and at 1, 4, 8, and 24 postoperative hours. Patient satisfaction with analgesic management within the first 24 postoperative hours was also assessed. Results Patients who received SAP block had lower NRS scores at all measured time points, but this was only statistically significant at the fourthpostoperative hour (p-value= 0.002). Compared to controls, patients who received SAP had lower intraoperative (11.3±1.5 mg vs. 11.9±1.5 mg,p value = 0.131) and postoperative (4.6±5.7mg vs. 10.5±6 mg,p value=0.001) mean opioid consumption. However, only the reduction in postoperative opioid consumption was found to be statistically significant. Most participants (> 90%) in this study did not experience PONV and were very satisfied with their postoperative pain management. Conclusion Serratus anterior plane block reduces NRS pain scores postoperatively. It also significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption but does not significantly reduce intraoperative opioid consumption.

Biasing Gβγ Downstream Signaling with Gallein Inhibits Development of Morphine Tolerance and Potentiates Morphine-Induced Nociception in a Tolerant State.

Opioid analgesics are widely used as a treatment option for pain management and relief. However, the misuse of opioid analgesics has contributed to the current opioid epidemic in the United States. Prescribed opioids such as morphine, codeine, oxycodone, and fentanyl are mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists primarily used in the clinic to treat pain or during medical procedures, but development of tolerance limits their utility for treatment of chronic pain. Here we explored the effects of biasing Gβγ signaling on tolerance development after chronic morphine treatment in vivo. We hypothesized that biasing Gβγ signaling with gallein could prevent activation of regulatory signaling pathways that result in tolerance to antinociceptive effects of MOR agonists. Gallein has been shown to bind to Gβγ and inhibit interactions of Gβγ with phospholipase-Cβ3 (PLCβ3) or G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) but not G-protein inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. In mice, morphine-induced antinociception was evaluated in the 55°C warm water tail withdrawal assay. We used two paradigms for gallein treatment: administration during and after three times-daily morphine administration. Our results show that gallein cotreatment during repeated administration of morphine decreased opioid tolerance development and that gallein treatment in an opioid-tolerant state enhanced the potency of morphine. Mechanistically, our data suggest that PLCβ3 is necessary for potentiating effects of gallein in an opioid-tolerant state but not in preventing the development of tolerance. These studies demonstrate that small molecules that target Gβγ signaling could reduce the need for large doses of opioid analgesics to treat pain by producing an opioid-sparing effect. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Biasing Gβγ signaling prevents tolerance to repeated morphine administration in vivo and potentiates the antinociceptive effects of morphine in an opioid-tolerant state. Mechanistically, phospholipase-Cβ is necessary for potentiating effects of gallein in an opioid-tolerant state but not in preventing the development of tolerance. This study identifies a novel treatment strategy to decrease the development of tolerance to the analgesic effects of mu-opioid receptor agonists, which are necessary to improve pain treatment and decrease the incidence of opioid use disorder.

A comparative study between postoperative analgesia of suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (SIFI) and lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in hip arthroplasty

ABSTRACT Background Suprainguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block offers efficient pain relief in total hip arthroplasty, although motor blockage is a common complication. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a promising technique with less motor block; in research, we evaluate the efficacy of both blocks regarding analgesia and early mobilization. Patients and method Fifty-six patients who underwent total hip replacement following spinal anesthesia were divided to either treated with ultrasound guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block or ultrasound guided ESPB at the end of surgery. The primary measure of interest was the pethidine consumed within a 24-hour period following the surgical procedure. Subordinate outcomes were: first rescue pethidine time, pain scores, and onset of ambulation. Post-operative vomiting, nausea, and other adverse events were recorded. Results Fifty-six patients were involved in the study. No significant statistical variances were found in pethidine consumed at 24 hours (p = 0.122) or pain scores and rescue analgesia timing (p = 0.075). ESPB provided an early onset of ambulation with a highly significant divergence (p < 0.001). Conclusion We concluded that ESPB has a similar analgesic, opioid sparing effect to SIFI block after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and provides early onset of ambulation.

Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block and early postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundHip replacement surgery can be painful; postoperative analgesia is crucial for comfort and to facilitate recovery. Regional anaesthesia can reduce pain and postoperative opioid requirements. The role of ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for analgesia after elective total hip arthroplasty is not well defined. This randomised trial evaluated its analgesic efficacy. MethodsConsenting participants (134) scheduled for elective primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block with ropivacaine 0.5% or sham block with saline. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. Additional outcomes included pain scores at 4, 8, 12, and 16 h, opioid-related side-effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritis), ability to perform physiotherapy on the first postoperative day, and physiotherapist-assessed quadriceps weakness. ResultsThere were no significant differences in 24-h opioid consumption (block vs sham block, mean difference −3.2 mg oral morphine equivalent, 95% confidence interval −15.3 to 8.1 mg oral morphine equivalent, P=0.55) or any other prespecified outcomes. ConclusionsIn patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block with ropivacaine did not confer a significant opioid-sparing effect compared with sham block. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes including pain scores, opioid-related side-effects, or ability to perform physiotherapy on the first postoperative day. Clinical trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03069183).

Peripheral nerve blocks for analgesia following cesarean delivery A narrative review.

Spinal and epidural blocks are commonly employed for pain relief during and following cesarean section. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been the gold standard for the same for many years. In recent times, many peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been tried for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery (PACD). This article has reviewed the common PNBs used for PACD. The role of PNBs along with ITM has been studied and the current best strategy for PACD has also been explored. Currently, Ilio-inguinal nerve and anterior transversus abdominis plane block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine have been found to be the most effective strategy, providing lower rest pain at 6 hours as compared to ITM alone. In patients not receiving intrathecal morphine, recommended PNBs are lateral transversus abdominis plane block, single shot local anesthetic wound infiltration, or continuous wound infiltration with catheter below rectus fascia. PNBs are recommended for PACD. They have an opioid-sparing effect and are devoid of adverse effects associated with central neuraxial blocks such as hypotension, bradycardia, and urine retention. However, caution must be observed with PNBs for possible local anesthetic toxicity due to the large volumes of drug required.

Clinical Effectiveness of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block versus Local Anesthesia Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Children: A Study Protocol for a Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial.

Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic appendicectomy is a key determinant of early rehabilitation in children. Recent guidelines recommend performing either a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or local anesthesia (LA) wound infiltration as part of multimodal postoperative analgesia after appendectomy. To date, the clinical effectiveness of TAP block versus LA wound infiltration has never been compared. The hypothesis of this study is that the TAP block may provide a greater opioid-sparing effect after laparoscopic appendicectomy in children than LA wound infiltration. We designed a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled phase III trial and aim to include 110 children who undergo laparoscopic appendicectomy. Children are randomized to receive either TAP block (TAP group) or LA wound infiltration (infiltration group). Multimodal analgesia is standardized in the two groups using the same protocol, which includes the stepwise prescription of paracetamol, phloroglucinol, ketoprofene, and nalbuphine according to the hetero-evaluation of pain performed by the nurses who were blinded to the treatment allocated using the validated FLACC scale. The primary outcome is the total dose of nalbuphine administered within 24 hours after surgery. No study has specifically compared the clinical effectiveness of TAP block versus LA wound infiltration for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy in children. This paper describes the protocol for a randomized trial that addresses this issue. The results of this trial will be useful for editing guidelines with a higher level of evidence on this topic.

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after orthognathic surgery: a scoping review

IntroductionPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common adverse events following orthognathic surgery. It’s a distressing feeling for patients and continues to be the cause of postoperative complications such as bleeding, delayed healing, and wound infection. This scoping review aims to identify effective PONV prophylaxis strategies during orthognathic surgery that have emerged in the past 15 years.MethodsWe searched Pubmed, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and Embase from 2008 to May 2023. Studies meeting the following criteria were eligible for inclusion: (1) recruited patients undergo any orthognathic surgery; (2) evaluated any pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic method to prevent PONV. Studies meeting the following criteria were excluded: (1) case series, review papers, or retrospective studies; (2) did not report our prespecified outcomes.ResultsTwenty-one studies were included in this review. Pharmacological methods for PONV prevention include ondansetron and dexamethasone (3 studies), peripheral nerve block technique (4 studies), dexmedetomidine (1 study), pregabalin (2 studies), nefopam (2 studies), remifentanil (1 study), propofol (2 studies), and penehyclidine (1 study). Non-pharmacologic methods include capsicum plaster (1 study), throat packs (2 studies) and gastric aspiration (2 studies).ConclusionsBased on current evidence, we conclude that prophylactic antiemetics like dexamethasone, ondansetron, and penehyclidine are the first defense against PONV. Multimodal analgesia with nerve block techniques and non-opioid analgesics should be considered due to their notable opioid-sparing and PONV preventive effect. For the non-pharmacological methods, throat packs are not recommended for routine use because of their poor effect and serious complications. More prospective RCTs are required to confirm whether gastric aspiration can prevent PONV effectively for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.