Opioid-related Adverse Events Research Articles

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Adding Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block to Interpectoral-Pectoserratus Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgery.

The interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block is expected to anesthetize the lateral breast, but it is unclear whether the deep parasternal intercostal plane block may enhance recovery by providing analgesia to the medial breast. Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery were randomly assigned to receive either the interpectoral-pectoserratus block (single block) or interpectoral-pectoserratus combined with deep parasternal intercostal block (combined block). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery-15 questionnaire score assessed at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary measures included dermatomal block assessment, pain severity, opioid consumption, opioid-related adverse events, hospital length of stay, and chronic postsurgical pain at 3 months after surgery. One hundred and sixteen patients were recruited, 58 in the single block group and 58 in the combined block group. There was no important difference in the 24-hour quality of recovery scores with mean (standard deviation [SD]) 123.6 (6.3) in the single block group and 123.2 (7.1) in the combined block group (mean difference, 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.0 to 2.9; P =.731). There was greater dermatomal block on medial breast in the combined block group. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes. Addition of deep parasternal intercostal plane block was not superior to interpectoral-pectoserratus plane block alone for the quality of recovery in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Comparison of Oliceridine to Remifentanil for Optimal Analgesia in Mechanical Ventilation (CO-ROAM): Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Critically ill patients often endure pain, a distressing experience that can trigger diverse pathophysiological consequences. While remifentanil, with its rapid kinetics, is commonly used for analgesia in intensive care units (ICU), it frequently leads to opioid-related adverse effects. A promising alternative has emerged in oliceridine, a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist. This new drug offers the potential for effective pain relief with fewer side effects. However, its efficacy and safety profile in mechanically ventilated ICU patients remain to be fully elucidated. This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled trial conducted across 24 ICUs in China. A total of 292 mechanically ventilated patients requiring analgesia and sedation will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the oliceridine or remifentanil group. The oliceridine group will receive oliceridine (2-20μg/kg/h), while the remifentanil group will receive remifentanil (1.5-12μg/kg/h). Both groups will receive propofol for sedation if necessary. The target for analgesia is Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT)<3, and for sedation is Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) -2 to 0. The primary outcome will be the percentage of time within target analgesia during study drug administration. Secondary outcomes will include gastrointestinal dysfunction, respiratory depression, sedative usage, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay length, extubation failure rate, etc. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06454292. Registered on June 11, 2024.

Glial-modulating agents for the treatment of pain: a systematic review.

Preclinical research supports a critical role for nervous system glia in pain pathophysiology. This systematic review of human trials of potential glia-modulating drugs for the prevention or treatment of pain followed a predefined search strategy and protocol registration. We searched for English language, randomized, double-blind trials comparing putative glia-modulating drugs to placebo or other comparators. The primary outcomes included validated participant-reported measures of pain intensity or relief and, in studies of opioid administration, measures of opioid consumption and/or opioid-related adverse effects. Twenty-six trials (2132 participants) of glial modulators (12 minocycline, 11 pentoxifylline, and 3 ibudilast) were included. Because of clinical heterogeneity related to study drug, participant population, outcome measures, and trial design, no meta-analysis was possible. Only 6 trials reported a positive effect of the treatment (pentoxifylline-4 trials; minocycline-2 trials), whereas 11 trials reported mixed results and 9 trials reported no effect. This review does not provide convincing evidence of efficacy of current pharmacological targets of nervous system glial function for pain treatment or prevention. However, in light of ample preclinical evidence of the importance of neuroimmune signalling and glial functions in pain pathophysiology, continued strategic human research is anticipated to identify (1) drugs with maximal activity as selectively targeted glial modulators, (2) the necessary timing and duration of pharmacological glial modulation needed for pain prevention or treatment for specific injuries or pain conditions, and (3) the best design of future clinical trials of glial-targeted drugs for pain treatment and/or prevention.

Opioid free versus opioid sparing strategies for multimodal antinociception during laparoscopic colectomy: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundIt remains unclear whether opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), when compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA), reduces postoperative opioid consumption while still providing adequate pain control. We thus tested the hypothesis that patients having an OFA strategy during laparoscopic colectomy would require less postoperative opioids when compared to an OSA strategy. MethodsThis single-center, prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, randomly allocated consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy to receive either sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine (OFA group) or sevoflurane-sufentanil boluses anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine (OSA group). Both groups received multimodal antinociception with boluses of dexamethasone, lidocaine, and ketamine during anesthesia induction, as well as acetaminophen, ketoprofen, and nefopam before the end of the surgery. OFA patients also received a dose of magnesium sulfate during induction. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 48 h after surgery, expressed in oral morphine equivalents (OME). Secondary exploratory outcomes were pain scores, opioid-related adverse events, and patient quality of life (WHODAS score). ResultsOf the 160 randomized patients, 155 were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Median [Q1-Q3] OME consumption at 48 hours after surgery did not differ between groups (9 [0-30] mg for OFAvs. 14 [0-30] mg for OSA; p = 0.861). Key secondary outcomes were not different between groups except a three time higher incidence of bradycardia in the OFA group. ConclusionsIn patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy with a multimodal antinociception protocol, OFA, when compared to OSA, did not decrease postoperative opioid consumption. Clinical Trial Registry and NumberNCT05031234.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) cardiac turnkey order set for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery: Proceedings from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) ERAS Conclave 2023

ObjectiveOptimal perioperative pain management is an essential component of perioperative care for the cardiac surgical patient. This turnkey order set is part of a series created by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society, first presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery in 2023. Several guidelines and expert consensus documents have been published to provide guidance on pain management and opioid reduction in cardiac surgery. Our objective is to consolidate that guidance into an evidence-based order set that will assist in the implementation of a comprehensive multimodal approach to pain management. MethodsSubject matter experts were consulted to translate existing guidelines and peer-reviewed literature into a sample turnkey order set for pain management. Orders derived from consistent Class I, IIA, or equivalent recommendations across referenced guidelines and consensus manuscripts appear in the order set in bold type. Selected orders that were inconsistently Class I or IIA, Class IIB, or supported by published evidence, were also included in italicized type. ResultsOpioid-based analgesia is associated with delayed recovery and opioid-related adverse events. Several multimodal medications have been shown to reduce reliance upon opioids. These include the scheduled use of acetaminophen, gabapentinoids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In addition, intravenous analgesics such as dexmedetomidine, ketamine, magnesium, and lidocaine have been shown to both complement the maintenance of anesthesia as well as optimize pain control postoperatively. Long-acting opioids remain a key component of pain management when provided to reduce the overall use of short-acting synthetic opioids or in direct response to break though pain after exhausting other alternatives. When applied in a bundled fashion, several studies have demonstrated a reduction in overall opioid administration and improved rates of postoperative recovery. ConclusionsThere has been increased awareness regarding the potential short- and long-term adverse effects of both inadequate analgesia and excessive opioid administration after cardiac surgery. This turnkey order set aims to facilitate implementation of a comprehensive approach toward provision of multimodal, opioid-sparing medications to optimize pain management in cardiac surgery.

Orlando Veterans Affairs stratification tool for opioid risk mitigation (STORM) very high risk interdisciplinary team review: A brief report

BackgroundCompared to the general population, Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients have higher rates of mental illness, chronic pain, and substance use disorders (SUD), conditions that increase risk for opioid-related adverse events. VHA developed the Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation (STORM) and mandated case reviews by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) for patients identified as very high risk, a process implemented and led by clinical pharmacist practitioners at the Orlando Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (OVAHCS) in 2018. ObjectiveTo evaluate and describe the implementation and process for IDT reviews of patients identified as very high risk by the STORM clinical decision support tool at OVAHCS. MethodsA single center, retrospective, observational chart review was conducted. Veterans reviewed by the STORM IDT between January and September 2018 were reviewed for change in Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD), naloxone, nonopioid analgesics, medications for SUD, benzodiazepines, engagement with clinical services (e.g., mental health, SUD, and pain clinic), and overdose or suicide attempts in the year prior versus the year after IDT review. The frequency of follow-up IDT reviews was evaluated. ResultsSeventeen patients were identified. Four were excluded due to nonopioid related death within 12 months after review. The average baseline MEDD was 82.2 mg (range 10–496 mg) and average 12 months after review was 7.5 mg (range 0 – 67.5 mg), a decrease of 74.7 mg, or 90.9% reduction. An increase in medications for SUD (3 patients; 23%), SUD engagement (3 to 6 patients), and urine drug tests was observed (79% increase). Benzodiazepine use decreased by 50%. ConclusionThis report provides insight on the IDT case review process at OVAHCS, a process that may vary widely across facilities. A reduction in MEDD, increase in SUD treatment, and improved risk mitigation was observed. The central role of clinical pharmacy and expanded process for continued follow-up warrants further study.

Sex Differences in the Development of an Opioid Addiction–Like Phenotype: A Focus on the Telescoping Effect

BackgroundWomen develop addiction and drug-related health consequences after fewer years of drug use than men; this accelerated time course, or telescoping effect, has been observed clinically for multiple drugs, including opioids. Preclinical studies indicate that this is a biologically based phenomenon; however, these studies have focused exclusively on cocaine, and none have considered health effects. MethodsIn this study, we used a rat (Sprague Dawley) model to determine sex differences in the time course for the development of an opioid addiction–like phenotype, as defined by the development of physical dependence (withdrawal-induced weight loss) and an increase in motivation for fentanyl (under a progressive-ratio schedule). Effects were determined following either 10 days (optimized, experiment 1) or 3 days (threshold, experiment 2) of extended-access fentanyl self-administration (24 hours/day, fixed ratio 1, 2- to 5-minute trials/hour) or following short-access fentanyl self-administration (subthreshold, experiment 3; fixed ratio 1, up to 40 infusions/day). Opioid-related adverse health effects were also determined (experiment 4). ResultsMotivation for fentanyl was similarly increased in males and females following 10 days of extended-access self-administration (experiment 1), was transiently increased in females, but not males, following 3 days of extended-access self-administration (experiment 2) and was not increased in either sex following short-access self-administration (experiment 3). Females developed fentanyl-associated adverse health effects more readily than males (experiment 4), with particularly robust differences during extended-access self-administration and withdrawal. ConclusionsAs with findings in humans, female rats developed opioid addiction–like features and adverse health consequences more readily than male rats. These data provide support for a biologically based telescoping effect in females for opioids, particularly for opioid-related adverse health consequences.

Opioid-free anesthesia with esketamine-dexmedetomidine versus opioid-based anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundOFA (Opioid-free anesthesia) has the potential to reduce the occurrence of opioid-related adverse events and enhance postoperative recovery. Our research aimed to investigate whether OFA, combining esketamine and dexmedetomidine, could serve as an alternative protocol to traditional OBA (opioid-based anesthesia) in shoulder arthroscopy, particularly in terms of reducing PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting).MethodsA total of 60 patients treated with shoulder arthroscopy from September 2021 to September 2022 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to the OBA group (n = 30) and OFA group (n = 30), receiving propofol-remifentanil TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia) and esketamine-dexmedetomidine intravenous anesthesia, respectively. Both groups received ultrasound-guided ISBPB(interscalene brachial plexus block)for postoperative analgesia.ResultsThe incidence of PONV on the first postoperative day in the ward (13.3% vs. 40%, P < 0.05) was significantly lower in the OFA group than in the OBA group. Moreover, the severity of PONV was less severe in the OFA group than in the OBA group in PACU (post-anesthesia care unit) (0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 3], P<0.05 ) and in the ward 24 h postoperatively ( 0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 2.25], P<0.05). Additionally, the OFA group experienced a significantly shorter length of stay in the PACU compared to the OBA group (39.4 ± 6.76 min vs. 48.7 ± 7.90 min, P < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared to the OBA with propofol-remifentanil, the OFA with esketamine- dexmedetomidine proved to be feasible for shoulder arthroscopy, resulting in a reduced incidence of PONV and a shorter duration of stay in the PACU.Trial registrationThe Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No: ChiCTR2100047355), 12/06/2021.

Postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-centre historical cohort study.

Concerns around delayed emergence and opioid-induced ventilatory impairment in bariatric surgery can lead to intraoperative reliance on short-acting opioids and avoidance of long-acting analgesics with potential sedative effects. Nevertheless, an overly-conservative intraoperative analgesic strategy may result in significant pain at emergence and higher opioid requirements in later phases of care. We sought to establish the pattern of intraoperative analgesic use in bariatric surgical patients as well as their postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements. We undertook a single-centre historical cohort study. We explored associations between intraoperative analgesic interventions and pain scores and opioid requirements in postanesthesia care units (PACUs), and associations between the quality of analgesia at emergence and subsequent pain and patient-centred recovery outcomes. We extracted perioperative data for 939 patients who underwent bariatric metabolic surgery between January 2018 and October 2019. Only 39% of patients received long-acting opioids intraoperatively and there was minimal use of nonopioid analgesic adjuncts. Nearly 80% of patients reported moderate-to-severe pain on PACU arrival; 97% of patients received intravenous opioids for rescue analgesia (mean dose, 31mg oral morphine equivalents). Lower pain scores at PACU admission and discharge were associated with subsequent lower inpatient pain scores, lower opioid requirements, shorter time to ambulation, and shorter length of hospital stay. In bariatric surgical patients, effective intraoperative analgesic strategies that improve early pain control may have an impact on recovery and pain experience. Judicious use of intraoperative opioids coupled with opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques should be considered and balanced against concerns regarding opioid-related adverse effects in this patient population.

The OPI•AID Zone Tool as a composite outcome for postoperative pain management quality-A protocol for an observational pilot study.

Managing postoperative pain while minimizing opioid-related adverse drug events (ORADEs) remains a significant challenge. The OPI•AID Zone Tool is proposed as a novel clinical decision support tool that - both graphically and in a scoring-system -represents the relationship between pain management and the occurrence of ORADEs, aiming to enhance patient outcomes in postoperative care. The OPI•AID Zone Tool places pain scoreon the x-axis and an ORADE score on the y-axis, and stratifies patients into five zones to reflect the composite impact of pain severity and ORADEs on the quality of postoperative patient care. The study will have two key aims: (1) to explore whether the OPI•AID Zone Tool can function as a composite outcome measure for postoperative pain and ORADEs, and (2) to evaluate the use of the OPI•AID Zone Tool in visual presentations and for evaluation of patients' postoperative pain management quality. This prospective observational cohort study will include 200 adults undergoing various surgical procedures in general anesthesia with a subsequent stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at Bispebjerg Hospital, Denmark. Substudy 1 primary outcome: To assess whether a zone score in the OPI•AID Zone Tool is associated with patient-perceived health (EQ VAS), quality of recovery (QoR-PACU), and time to discharge readiness in PACU, and if the zone score has a stronger association than pain and ORADE score in themselves. Substudy 2 primary outcome: To assess how the use of intraoperative non-opioid analgesics impact where patients are placed in the OPI•AID Zone Tool's XY scatterplot right after surgery. To assess if patients who receive more comprehensive non-opioid analgesic basic regimens, generally fall into lower zones. The OPI•AID Zone Tool could potentially be a valuable clinical decision-making tool for optimizing postoperative care by simultaneously addressing pain management and the risk of ORADEs. By computing a composite measure of these two critical outcomes, the tool could guide more nuanced and patient-centered analgesic regimens, potentially improving patient satisfaction and operational efficiency in postoperative settings. The tool's applicability will be explored in this observational pilot and followed up in a planned series of studies (opiaid.dk).

Nalbuphine versus morphine: an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia for controlling pain after total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Nalbuphine, a synthetic k-agonist and µ-antagonist, provides efficient pain relief while reducing opioid-related adverse effects. This study aims to compare the efficacy of intrathecal nalbuphine (ITN) with intrathecal morphine (ITM) for post-TKA pain. A retrospective cohort analysis of 131 patients who underwent TKA with spinal anesthesia (SA), a single shot of adductor canal block, and periarticular injections was conducted. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Group N received 0.8mg nalbuphine, and Group M received 0.2mg morphine as an adjuvant to SA. Propensity-score matching was employed to compare the visual analog scales (VAS) of postoperative pain intensity, cumulative morphine use (CMU), maximum knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR) ability, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and length of hospital stay (LHS). The mean VAS of group M were significantly lower than group N at 6, 12, 18, and 24h (P < 0.01). Group M had lower CMU than group N at 24h (P < 0.01) and 48h (P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between groups in terms of knee flexion angle and SLR at any time point. Additionally, 29.3 and 57.9% of patients in group N and M experienced PONV, respectively (p = 0.04), and group N had significantly shorter LHS compared to group M (P < 0.001). Although, intrathecal morphine (ITM) still provides better pain control particularly in the first 24h, patients who received intrathecal nalbuphine (ITN) had significantly fewer incidence of PONV, and shorter LHS.

Efficacy of subcutaneous sumatriptan in postcraniotomy pain and opioid consumption.

Traditional pain management pathways following craniotomy are predicated on opioids. However, narcotics can confound critical neurological examination, contribute to respiratory depression, lower the seizure threshold, and lead to medication habituation, dependence, and/or abuse. Alternative medications to better address postoperative pain while mitigating opioid-related adverse effects remain insufficiently studied. Preliminary studies suggest sumatriptan, a 5-HT (1B/1D) receptor agonist known to regulate dural vasoactivity and inflammation, may moderate pain following trigeminal microvascular decompression and chronic postcraniotomy headache. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of sumatriptan to modulate pain and opioid requirements following craniotomy surgery. This was a single academic center, retrospective cohort study of 300 consecutive adult patients who underwent elective craniotomy surgery between 2015 and 2022. Patients were equally divided between a control and a sumatriptan cohort contingent upon administration of 6 mg of subcutaneous sumatriptan within 1 hour of surgery completion and prior to opioid administration. Postoperative opioid consumption at 6, 12, and 24 hours, as well as admission total, inpatient length of stay, and 30-day global reevaluation, were assessed. Three hundred patients were included for analysis. Significant differences were seen in baseline hypertension (p < 0.01), hyperlipemia (p < 0.01), anxiety (p = 0.04), and operative time (p = 0.02). A significant reduction of mean postoperative pain scores at 12 (p = 0.03) and 24 (p < 0.01) hours and total opioid consumption (p = 0.04) was observed in the sumatriptan cohort. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly lower postoperative pain scores at 6 (p = 0.05), 12 (p < 0.01), and 24 (p < 0.01) hours in patients who underwent burr hole placement in the sumatriptan cohort as compared with controls; however, no significant difference in opioid consumption was noted. No adverse events related to sumatriptan administration were noted throughout the study. Postoperative single-dose subcutaneous sumatriptan following elective craniotomy may reduce pain scores and opioid requirements. Additional studies are needed to better understand nuanced differences in opioid modulation and optimal patient selection.

Postoperative pain management after thoracic transplantations.

Heart and lung transplantation evolution marked significant milestones. Pioneering efforts of Dr Christiaan Barnard with the first successful heart transplant in 1967, followed by advancements in heart-lung and single-lung transplants by Drs Bruce Reitz, Norman Shumway, and Joel Cooper laid the groundwork for contemporary organ transplantation, offering hope for patients with end-stage heart and pulmonary diseases. Pretransplant opioid use in heart transplant recipients is linked to higher mortality and opioid dependence posttransplant. Effective pain control is crucial to reduce opioid-related adverse effects and enhance recovery. However, research on specific pain management protocols for heart transplant recipients is limited. In lung transplantation effective pain management is crucial. Studies emphasize the benefits of multimodal strategies, including thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral blocks, to enhance recovery and reduce opioid use. Perioperative pain control challenges in lung transplantation are unique and necessitate careful consideration to prevent complications and improve outcomes. This review emphasizes the importance of tailored pain management in heart and lung transplant recipients. It advocates for extended follow-up and alternative analgesics to minimize opioid dependency and enhance quality of life. Further high-quality research is needed to optimize postoperative analgesia and improve patient outcomes.

Epidural methadone and morphine pharmacokinetics and clinical effects in healthy volunteers: A randomized, crossover-design trial.

Epidural opioids can provide effective analgesia for acute postoperative pain. Due to its unique physicochemical properties and long systemic elimination half-life, epidural methadone may provide lasting analgesia with minimal adverse effects; however, human studies are lacking. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that epidural methadone would exhibit greater segmental analgesia (analgesia at the dermatome of injection vs. distant dermatomes) than epidural morphine. In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study, thirteen healthy volunteers received a 4-mg epidural bolus of methadone or morphine at L3-L4 and underwent repeated assessment of dermatomal heat pain tolerance and pressure pain threshold at lumbar (L3) and trigeminal (V2) dermatomes, pupil diameter, respiratory parameters and venous opioid concentration for 24 h. The primary outcome was selective (lumbar vs. trigeminal) segmental analgesia for heat pain, as a marker of a spinal analgesic mechanism. The degree of segmental analgesia to heat pain tolerance was not different between morphine and methadone (P =.09), although morphine (P =.0009) but not methadone (P =.81) produced significant analgesia to heat pain at the lumbar vs. trigeminal dermatome over 0-12 h. Morphine overall provided longer lasting analgesia to heat pain vs. methadone (24 vs. 2 h, respectively). Morphine elicited greater systemic effects, including miosis (P =.009) and opioid-related adverse effects (P =.002). These results suggest that, with equal epidural doses, both methadone and morphine produced analgesia and methadone did not produce greater segmental effects than morphine. Epidural methadone provided a more favourable adverse effect profile.

Methadone versus other opioids for refractory malignant bone pain: a pilot randomised controlled study

PurposeRefractory cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) affects a patient’s functional capacity and quality of life, but there is limited evidence to guide opioid choice. We assessed the feasibility, tolerability and possible efficacy of methadone rotation (MR) compared to other opioid rotations (OOR) in this cohort.MethodsAdults with CIBP and worst pain intensity ≥ 4/10 and/or opioid toxicity graded ≥ 2 on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were randomised 1:1 to methadone or another opioid rotation. Standardised assessment tools were used at pre-defined study time points up to 14 days.ResultsOf 51 eligible participants, 38 (74.5%) consented, and 29 (76.3%, MR: 14, OOR: 15) completed the fourteen days follow-up post-opioid rotation. Both groups displayed significant reduction in average (MR: d = − 1.2, p = 0.003, OOR: d = − 0.8, p = 0.015) and worst pain (MR: d = − 0.9, p = 0.042, OOR: d = − 0.6, p = 0.048) and total pain interference score (MR: d = − 1.1, p = 0.042, OOR: d = − 0.7, p = 0.007). Oral morphine equivalent daily dose was reduced significantly in MR compared to the OOR group (d = − 0.8, p = 0.05). The incidence of opioid-related adverse events following MR was unchanged but lower in the OOR group (d = 0.9, 95% CI 0.1,1.7, p = 0.022). There were no within-group or between-group differences in satisfaction with analgesia at the end of the study.ConclusionThis pilot study demonstrated that MR and OOR in patients with refractory CIBP are feasible, safe and acceptable to patients. Appropriately powered multi-centre randomised controlled studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of MR and OOR in this cohort.Trial registrationACTRN12621000141842 registered 11 February 2021.

The use of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation to reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing off-pump CABG: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundHigh doses of long-acting opioids were used to facilitate off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting procedure, which may result in opioid-related adverse events after surgery. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) had been reported to be effective in reducing intraoperative opioids consumption during surgery. The aim of this study is to assess whether TEAS with difference acupoints can reduce the doses of opioid analgesics.MethodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting under general anesthesia were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly and equally grouped into sham acupuncture group (n = 105), regional acupoints combination group (n = 105), or distal–proximal acupoints combination group (n = 105) using a centralized computer-generated randomization system. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation was applied for 30 min before anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the doses of sufentanil during anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included the highest postoperative vasoactive-inotropic scores within 24 h, intraoperative propofol consumption, length of mechanical ventilation, duration of cardiac care unit and postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and mortality within 30 days after surgery.ResultsOf the 315 randomized patients, 313 completed the trial. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the doses of sufentanil were 303.9 (10.8) μg in the distal–proximal acupoints group, significantly lower than the sham group, and the mean difference was − 34.9 (− 64.9 to − 4.9) μg, p = 0.023. The consumption of sufentanil was lower in distal–proximal group than regional group (303.9 vs. 339.5), and mean difference was − 35.5 (− 65.6 to − 5.5) μg, p = 0.020. The distal–proximal group showed 10% reduction in opioids consumption comparing to both regional and sham groups. Secondary outcomes were comparable among three groups.ConclusionTranscutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation with distal–proximal acupoints combination, compared to regional acupoints combination and sham acupuncture, significantly reduced sufentanil consumption in patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Clinical observation of the treatment of refractory cancer pain with cancer pain information platform and IDDS under home analgesia mode: A retrospective study.

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a cancer pain information platform combined with semi-implantable intrathecal drug delivery systems among the patients with refractory cancer pain under a "home analgesia" model. This was a retrospective study. A total of 49 patients underwent semi-implantable intrathecal drug delivery systems with patient-controlled analgesia in conjunction with the establishment of a cancer pain information platform. Numeric rating scales (NRS), Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS), high-quality sleep duration, and opioid-related adverse effects were recorded at various time points and analyzed: the day on admission (T0), the day of discharge (T1), 30 days post-discharge (T2), 60 days post-discharge (T3), 90 days post-discharge (T4), 120 days post-discharge (T5), 150 days post-discharge (T6), 180 days post-discharge (T7), and the day before death (T8). Compared with T0, NRS significantly decreased and BCS significantly increased at T1 to T8 time points (P < .05). However, NRS and BCS did not show differences at T1 to T8 time points (P > .05). The duration of high-quality sleep was significantly extended, and the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects was significantly reduced. Postoperative complications included 1 case of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 3 cases of infection at the butterfly needle insertion site, 6 cases of hospital readmission for equipment malfunction, and no cases of respiratory depression. Eleven patients continued standardized antitreatment after IDDS surgery. The mean survival time for all patients was 135.51 ± 102.69 days, and the survival rate at T7 was 30.61%. The cancer pain information platform combined with semi-implantable IDDS is beneficial for the pain management of refractory cancer patients under the "home analgesia" model, improving their quality of life.

Fascia Iliaca Block versus Femoral Nerve Block as Post Operative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) are common surgical procedures for treatment of the degenerative disorders and traumatic diseases. However, a majority of patients often experience moderate to severe postoperative pain after THA. Postoperative pain control has a significant impact on earlier ambulation, initiation of physiotherapy, and better functional recovery. In addition, effective pain control would lower the length of hospital stay and the risk of thrombotic events which improves patients’ satisfaction. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of FICB compared with FNB. Patients and Methods After approval of anesthesiology department scientific and ethical committees in Ain Shams University Hospitals, patients were included in the study, and were divided into two groups (n = 20; each); group FICB and FNB group. Group FICB: Patients (n = 20) of this group received ultrasound guided Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) before spinal anesthesia using 20-40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Group FNB: Patients (n = 20) of this group received ultrasound guided femoral nerve block (FNB) before spinal anesthesia using 20-40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Results The two groups were adequately monitored and assessed post-operatively and they were compared regarding analgesic outcome by using the visual analogue scaling system, besides, recording time for first call for rescue analgesia. Demographic data, post-operative hemodynamics, and sedation score were also assessed. Conclusion Fascia iliaca compartment block is effective for pain relief during the early post- operative period after total hip arthroplasty. Meanwhile, it can reduce the cumulative meperidine consumption and the risk of opioid-related adverse effects.

Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block for analgesia in hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized comparative study

Background and objective The ideal regional analgesic block following hip arthroplasty is not yet defined. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block analgesia in patients subjected to hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Patients and methods Following ethical approval, 70 participants scheduled for hip arthroplasty under subarachnoid block were included in the current prospective randomized double-blinded comparative study. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups (n=35 each): anterior QLB group and PENG group. The primary outcome was the time to the first postoperative request for analgesia. The secondary outcomes were assessment of pain during the positioning for giving spinal anesthesia, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during movement and at rest, the total opioid consumption during the first postoperative 24 h, motor power assessment of the hip joint, and block and opioid-related complications. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two studied groups regarding the time to first analgesic request, pain VAS scores at rest and on movement, total morphine consumption, positing pain, hip motor recovery, and block and opioid-related adverse effects. Conclusion The anterior QLB and the PENG block provided comparable posthip arthroplasty analgesia for patients subjected to surgeries under spinal anesthesia as evidenced by the comparable pain VAS scores, duration of analgesia, and total 24 h’ morphine consumption with comparable block and opioid safety profiles.

Clinical Analysis of Different Anesthesia and Analgesia Methods for Patients Undergoing Uniportal Video-assisted Lung Surgery

PurposeA comparison of three intra-op modalities to determine a best and convenient pain control for uniportal lung surgery. This study compared general anesthesia with serratus plane block, general anesthesia with epidural and general anesthesia alone to look at post-operative pain scores in patients. Methods80 patients were enrolled and statistically analyzed. There were three interventions studied: Group S: General Anesthesia with Serratus Plane Block, Group E: General Anesthesia with thoracic epidural, Group G: General Anesthesia only. Outcome measures compared among 3 groups included demographic characters; surgical types; anesthesia and operative time; postoperative pain scores; vitals sign; morphine consumption at 0, 2, 6 hours, day1 and day2 postoperative; incidence of opioid-related adverse events and chronic pain; LOS hospital and overall expenses.The numerical rating scale was used to assess the degree of pain on the first and second postoperative days. Postoperative morphine consumption, incidence of opioid-related side effects, LOS(length of stay) hospital and overall hospital expenses were documented, as well as incidence of chronic postoperative pain. FindingsThere was no difference in incidence of opioid-related adverse events and chronic pain, LOS hospital and overall expenses among 3 groups. After investigating factors that may influence LOS hospital and overall expenses, the multivariable analysis indicated only longer operative time was associated with longer hospital stay and more hospital expenses. ImplicationsThis prospective study demonstrates that general anesthesia alone offers an easy and efficient approach resulting in similar postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption compared with nerve block and epidural. Longer operative time was associated with longer hospital stay and more hospital expenses.