Opioid-free Anesthesia Research Articles

Comparison of hemodynamic responses to nasal intubation in cancer patients receiving opioid-free general anesthesia versus standard regimen

Comparison of hemodynamic responses to nasal intubation in cancer patients receiving opioid-free general anesthesia versus standard regimen

Opioid-free anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

Opioid anesthesia is commonly employed in minimally invasive surgeries but is associated with adverse effects, including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Opioid-free anesthesia aims to mitigate these issues. We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) comparing opioid and opioid-free anesthesia in minimally invasive abdominal surgeries. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these approaches. Our primary outcomes were adverse effects (PONV, bradycardia), while secondary outcomes were pain, opioid consumption, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS). We performed a TSA to investigate the conclusiveness of the results. We included 26 RCTs encompassing 2,025 patients, with 1,009 (49%) in the opioid-free anesthesia group. Opioid-free anesthesia reduced PONV significantly (risk ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.74; P < 0.001), but we found no significant differences in bradycardia rates. We found nonclinically relevant higher pain scores for opioid anesthesia (mean difference [MD], -0.9; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.2; P = 0.01) and opioid consumption at 2hr post surgery (MD, -5.4mg oral morphine equivalents; 95% CI, -9.1 to -1.8; P = 0.004). We also noted a reduced time to first analgesia (MD, 88min; 95% CI, 18 to 159; P = 0.01). We found no differences in PACU LOS. The TSA confirmed the sample size's adequacy in showing PONV reduction with opioid-free anesthesia. Opioid-free anesthesia showed a significant reduction in PONV and a decrease in opioid consumption during the first 2hr postoperatively, suggesting it can be an alternative to opioid anesthesia in minimally invasive abdominal surgeries. PROSPERO ( CRD42023492385 ); first submitted 18 December 2023.

No Difference in Postoperative Recovery Outcomes Between Opioid-Free and Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia Under Multimodal Analgesic Protocol for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.

Background: With growing concerns about opioid-related risks, efforts to reduce opioid use throughout the perioperative period have increased. This study aimed to compare postoperative recovery outcomes between opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) under a multimodal analgesic protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 196 patients undergoing VATS from August 2019 to December 2021. Patients received either dexmedetomidine-based OFA or remifentanil-based OSA. Postoperative recovery was assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, opioid consumption, and pain intensity. Additionally, opioid-related complications and intraoperative hemodynamic changes were evaluated. Results: Both groups showed similar QoR-15 scores 24 h postoperatively (124.2 ± 7.0 vs. 123.0 ± 6.9, p = 0.227). Opioid consumption and pain intensity were comparable, and the incidence of opioid-related adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups. Intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia were more frequent in the OFA group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The study concluded that both OFA and OSA, when used under a multimodal analgesic protocol, provided effective postoperative recovery in patients undergoing VATS with no significant differences in outcomes.

Optimizing pediatric tonsillectomy outcomes with an opioid sparing anesthesia protocol: Learning and continuously improving with real-world data.

This quality improvement initiative is a continued pursuit to optimize outcomes by iteratively improving our opioid sparing anesthesia protocol for tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy at our pediatric ambulatory surgical center through data driven Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. From 1/2015 through 12/2023, our standardized tonsillectomy protocol underwent nine procedure-specific perioperative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, three procedure-specific postoperative prescription Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, and four general ambulatory surgical center enhanced recovery Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. We analyzed data from the medical record using statistical process control charts. The primary outcome measure was the percent of patients requiring intravenous opioid in the post anesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes included maximum post anesthesia care unit pain score, the percent of patients requiring treatment for nausea and/or vomiting in the post anesthesia care unit, and the number of postoperative opioid prescription dosages. Balancing measures were average post anesthesia care unit length of stay, percent of patients with prolonged Post Anesthesia Care Unit length of stay (>120 min), and 30-day reoperation rate. A total of 5654 tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy cases were performed at our ambulatory surgical center from 2015 to 2023. The incidence of intravenous opioid administered in the post anesthesia care unit initially rose with opioid free anesthesia launch, but subsequently decreased below the target of 10%. Maximum post anesthesia care unit pain scores rose from mean 3.6 to 4.5, but subsequently returned to the baseline of 3.5, while the incidence of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting improved. The average post anesthesia care unit length of stay increased by 10 min with opioid free anesthesia; however, prolonged post anesthesia care unit stay and 30-day reoperation rates were unchanged. The continued refinement of our opioid sparing anesthesia protocol has led to reduced perioperative and home opioid use, stable maximum post anesthesia care unit pain scores, and improved postoperative nausea and vomiting rates, with only a slight increase in mean post anesthesia care unit length of stay.

Effect of individualized anesthesia and analgesia on postoperative pain in patients stratified for pain sensitivity: A study protocol for the PeriOPerative individualization trial randomized controlled trial.

Despite advancements in surgical and anesthesia techniques, acute and persistent postoperative pain are still a common challenge. Postoperative pain has direct effects on individual patient care and outcome, as well as putting strain on limited health care resources. Several prediction methods for postoperative pain have been described. One such method is the assessment of pain during peripheral venous cannulation (VCP). It is not known if different approaches to anesthesia and analgesia, depending on the evaluation of risk for postoperative pain, can improve outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate if individualized anesthesia and analgesia can affect postoperative pain and recovery after surgery, in patients stratified by VCP. Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery undergo pain-sensitivity stratification using VCP on the day of surgery. Patients scoring VCP ≥2.0 on the visual analogue scale (pain-sensitive) are randomized to multimodal anaesthesia and analgesia with opioids or standard of care. Patients scoring VCP ≤1.9 (pain-tolerant) are randomized to opioid-free anaesthesia or standard of care. The primary outcome is acute postoperative pain measured with numeric rating scale in the postoperative care unit. Secondary outcomes include analysis of pain after 24 h, persistent postoperative pain and quality of recovery. Individualized perioperative pain management has the potential to improve patient care. This study will examine the impact of different anesthesia and analgesia regimes, in patients with differing pain sensitivity, on postoperative pain. Prospectively posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04751812.

Application value of opioid-free anesthesia in renal cyst decompression by laparoscopy.

The objective of the study was to analyze the application value of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in renal cyst decompression by laparoscopy. A total of 124 patients undergoing renal cyst decompression by laparoscopy in our hospital were selected and divided into opioid anesthesia (OA) and OFA groups (n = 62). Fentanyl and remifentanil were used for anesthesia induction in the OA group, while lidocaine and dexmedetomidine were employed for anesthesia induction in the OFA group. The homeostasis indicators (cortisol [Cor], adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH], C-reactive protein [CRP], and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) were also compared 10 min before anesthesia (Ta), at the end of operation (Tb), and 24 h after operation (Tc). At T1-T3, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, mean airway pressure, and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide were all lower in OFA group than those in OA group (p < 0.05). At Tb-Tc, the levels of Cor, ACTH, CRP, and IL-6 were all higher in both groups than those at Ta (p < 0.05), while they were lower in OFA group than those in OA group (p < 0.05). OFA is more beneficial to the respiratory and circulatory system and homeostasis of patients, and has higher anesthetic safety.

Opioid free versus opioid sparing strategies for multimodal antinociception during laparoscopic colectomy: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundIt remains unclear whether opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), when compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA), reduces postoperative opioid consumption while still providing adequate pain control. We thus tested the hypothesis that patients having an OFA strategy during laparoscopic colectomy would require less postoperative opioids when compared to an OSA strategy. MethodsThis single-center, prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, randomly allocated consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy to receive either sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine (OFA group) or sevoflurane-sufentanil boluses anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine (OSA group). Both groups received multimodal antinociception with boluses of dexamethasone, lidocaine, and ketamine during anesthesia induction, as well as acetaminophen, ketoprofen, and nefopam before the end of the surgery. OFA patients also received a dose of magnesium sulfate during induction. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 48 h after surgery, expressed in oral morphine equivalents (OME). Secondary exploratory outcomes were pain scores, opioid-related adverse events, and patient quality of life (WHODAS score). ResultsOf the 160 randomized patients, 155 were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Median [Q1-Q3] OME consumption at 48 hours after surgery did not differ between groups (9 [0-30] mg for OFAvs. 14 [0-30] mg for OSA; p = 0.861). Key secondary outcomes were not different between groups except a three time higher incidence of bradycardia in the OFA group. ConclusionsIn patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy with a multimodal antinociception protocol, OFA, when compared to OSA, did not decrease postoperative opioid consumption. Clinical Trial Registry and NumberNCT05031234.

Comparative Study Of Standard Drug Dose Mixture Versus Fentanyl In Attenuating Stress Response During Laryngoscopy And Tracheal Intubation In Neurosurgery: A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is gaining prominence, particularly in neurosurgery, due to its potential to minimize opioid-related complications such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and shivering. This Prospective observational study aims to compare the efficacy of a standard drug dose mixture comprising intravenous magnesium sulphate, lignocaine, paracetamol, and tramadol with fentanyl in attenuating the hemodynamic stress response during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Methods: Sixty neurosurgical patients, aged 18 to 60 years, undergoing cervical or lumbar discectomies under general anesthesia in our institute were divided into two groups. One group received the standard drug dose mixture, and the other received fentanyl. Hemodynamic parameters, including pulse rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO2), and electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, were recorded at baseline, during intubation, and at one- minute intervals for five minutes post-intubation. Results: Both groups demonstrated stable hemodynamics with no significant differences in pulse rate or blood pressure. No ECG abnormalities were observed, and SpO2 remained above 96% in all patients. Additionally, the standard drug dose mixture group showed a reduced incidence of PONV and shivering compared to the fentanyl group. Conclusion: The standard drug dose mixture provides a safe and effective alternative to fentanyl for attenuating the hemodynamic stress response during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, with fewer side effects. Further randomized controlled trials are recommended to confirm these findings and explore the benefits of opioid-free anesthesia in various surgical procedures.

Opioid-free anesthesia attenuates perioperative immunosuppression by regulating macrophages polarization in gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor.

Opioid anesthesia can modulate the impaired immune response and opioid-sparing anesthesia may preserve immune functions. This study was performed to assess the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-based anesthesia (OA) on perioperative macrophages differentiation, cytokine changes, and perioperative complications in locally advanced GC (LAGC) patients. We used quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores to compare postoperative quality of recovery and pain level. In addition, the adverse reactions of patients in the two groups were compared. The perioperative serum level of inflammatory cytokines and the ratio of macrophage subtypes were detected. The OFA group had significantly longer extubation time and PACU stay, whereas the OA group had significantly higher rate of hypotension, higher doses of norepinephrine, higher PONV and dizziness rate, and delayed flatus passage time. The QoR-15 score on postoperative 24 h was significantly higher in OFA group than in OA group. At the end of or after the surgery, the OFA group had higher levels of interleukin (IL)-12, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, CD68+CD163- macrophage rate, but lower levels of IL-10, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, and CD68+CD163+ macrophage rate, indicating OFA attenuated perioperative immunosuppression by diminishing M2 and promoting M1 macrophage polarization. And the reversal tendency is more obvious in LAGC patients with neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor. The OFA may attenuate perioperative immunosuppression by diminishing M2 and promoting M1 macrophage polarization in LAGC patients with neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor. http://gcpgl.sysucc.org.cn, identifier 2022-FXY-001.

Predictors of major postoperative complications in cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) ± Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with a high incidence of postoperative morbidity. Our aim was to identify independent, potentially actionable perioperative predictors of major complications. We reviewed patients who underwent CRS ± HIPEC from June 2020 to January 2022 at a high-volume center. Postoperative complications were categorized using the Comprehensive Complication Index, with the upper quartile defining major complications. Multivariate logistic analysis identified predictive and protective factors. Of 168 patients, 119 (70.8%) underwent HIPEC. Mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 12.6 (12.7) and upper quartile cut-off was 22.6. Medical complications were more frequent but less severe than surgical (63% vs 18%). Forty-six patients (27.4%) comprised the "major complications" group (mean CCI 30.1 vs 6.3). Multivariate logistic regression showed that heart disease (RR 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.3), number of anastomoses (RR 2.4; 95% CI:1.3 to 4.6) and first 24-h fluid balance (RR 1.1; 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.2), were independently associated as risk factors for major complications, while opioid-free anesthesia (RR 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.9) and high preoperative hemoglobin (RR 0.9; CI 95%: 0.9 to 0.9) were independent-protective factors. Preoperative heart diseases, number of anastomoses and first 24h-fluid balance are independent risk factors for major postoperative complications, while high preoperative hemoglobin and opioid-free anesthesia are protective. Correction of anemia prior to surgery, avoiding positive fluid balance and incorporation of opioid-free anesthesia strategy are potential actionable measures to reduce postoperative morbidity.

Opioid-free anesthesia improves postoperative recovery quality of small and medium-sized surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled study.

Opioid anesthesia (OA) is currently the predominant anesthetic method. However, its associated side effects, such as nausea and vomiting, coupled with the principle of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), have spurred the adoption of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in select surgical procedures. For small and medium-sized operations, ERAS is particularly important. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of OFA, utilizing esketamine in combination with dexmedetomidine and sevoflurane, on postoperative recovery quality following small and medium-sized surgical interventions. A total of 120 patients who underwent various small and medium-sized operations were randomly allocated to OFA and OA groups. The OA group received sufentanyl and sevoflurane, while the OFA group received esketamine, dexmedetomidine, and sevoflurane. The primary outcome measure was the postoperative quality of recovery-40 scores (QoR-40) 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic changes at different time intervals, the incidences of adverse events were recorded. Patients in the OFA group exhibited a higher QoR-40 score of 184.0 (182.0, 186.2) compared to 182.0 (180.0, 184.0) in the OA group (P<0.001). The disparities were particularly noble in terms of Physical comfort and Emotional status. Multivariable analysis identified postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) as a significant independent factor impacting QoR-40 (β=-4.49 [-6.1, -2.87], P<0.001). Hemodynamic stability was more pronounced in the OFA than in the OA group. The incidence of PONV was substantially lower in the OFA group (one [1.6%] vs. 14 [25%], P<0.001), with a reduced need for vasoactive drugs (five [7.8%] vs. 15 [26.8%], P=0.005), and a lower incidence of respiratory depression (0 [0%] vs. six [10.7%], P=0.009). OFA improves the postoperative recovery quality in small and medium-sized surgical procedures, potentially attributed to decreased incidence of PONV. Additionally, OFA facilitates the maintenance of more stable hemodynamics throughout the operation.

Opioid-Free Using Ketamine versus Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia during the Intraoperative Period in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Opioids effectively manage perioperative pain but have numerous adverse effects. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) eliminates intraoperative opioid use; however, evidence for its use in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is limited. This study assessed the effect of OFA using ketamine in VATS patients compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA). A total of 91 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy or segmentectomy were randomized to either the OFA group (ketamine) or the OSA group (remifentanil). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery (QoR) on postoperative day (POD) 1, measured with the QoR-40 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and adverse events. Both groups had comparable baseline and surgical characteristics. On POD 1, the QoR-40 score was higher in the OFA group than in the OSA group (164.3 ± 10.8 vs. 158.7 ± 10.6; mean difference: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 10.0; p = 0.015), though this did not meet the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 6.3. The visual analog scale score was lower in the OFA group as compared to the OSA group at 0-1 h (4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 6.2 ± 2.1; p < 0.001) and 1-4 h after surgery (3.4 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.9; p = 0.003). The OFA group had a lower incidence of PONV (2 [4.4%] vs. 9 [19.6%]; p = 0.049) and postoperative shivering (4 [8.9%] vs. 13 [28.3%]; p = 0.030) than the OSA group at 0-1 h after surgery. Using OFA with ketamine proved feasible, as indicated by the stable intraoperative hemodynamics and absence of intraoperative awareness. Patients undergoing VATS with OFA using ketamine showed a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, QoR improvement compared to those receiving OSA with remifentanil.

Opioid-free anesthesia with esketamine-dexmedetomidine versus opioid-based anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundOFA (Opioid-free anesthesia) has the potential to reduce the occurrence of opioid-related adverse events and enhance postoperative recovery. Our research aimed to investigate whether OFA, combining esketamine and dexmedetomidine, could serve as an alternative protocol to traditional OBA (opioid-based anesthesia) in shoulder arthroscopy, particularly in terms of reducing PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting).MethodsA total of 60 patients treated with shoulder arthroscopy from September 2021 to September 2022 were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to the OBA group (n = 30) and OFA group (n = 30), receiving propofol-remifentanil TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia) and esketamine-dexmedetomidine intravenous anesthesia, respectively. Both groups received ultrasound-guided ISBPB(interscalene brachial plexus block)for postoperative analgesia.ResultsThe incidence of PONV on the first postoperative day in the ward (13.3% vs. 40%, P < 0.05) was significantly lower in the OFA group than in the OBA group. Moreover, the severity of PONV was less severe in the OFA group than in the OBA group in PACU (post-anesthesia care unit) (0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 3], P<0.05 ) and in the ward 24 h postoperatively ( 0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 2.25], P<0.05). Additionally, the OFA group experienced a significantly shorter length of stay in the PACU compared to the OBA group (39.4 ± 6.76 min vs. 48.7 ± 7.90 min, P < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared to the OBA with propofol-remifentanil, the OFA with esketamine- dexmedetomidine proved to be feasible for shoulder arthroscopy, resulting in a reduced incidence of PONV and a shorter duration of stay in the PACU.Trial registrationThe Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No: ChiCTR2100047355), 12/06/2021.

Assessing the impact of opioid-free anesthesia using the modified Mulimix technique on postoperative pain in bariatric surgery patients: a correlative randomized double-blinded trial

Background &amp; objective: The effective management of postoperative pain in bariatric surgery poses significant challenges to the anesthesiologists and the surgeons. Opioids have been the mainstay of postoperative pain management; but recently, opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has been a popular option in an effort to prevent the opioid related side-effects. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of OFA utilizing the modified mulimix technique on the levels of plasma interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). In addition, the study aimed to evaluate the duration of analgesia and the analgesic requirements during the first 24 hours postoperatively. Methodology: A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to the OFA Group, which received opioid-free anesthesia, and the OBA Group, which received Opioid-Based Anesthesia. The modified Mulimix technique was used in both groups. Serum samples were collected from all patients during skin incision and after the surgical procedure. Subsequently, these samples were assessed for IL-2 and IL-6 levels. The postoperative analgesic consumption was compared in both groups. Results: Regarding serum IL-2 and IL-6 levels in the two study groups, there was a statistically significant difference after the conclusion of surgery, and the skin incision was made. Regarding the initial rescue analgesia postoperatively assessment, the OBA group demonstrated a substantially greater overall consumption of analgesics within the first 24 h. The study revealed a significant difference in VAS values between the OBA Group and the OFA Group at 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h postoperatively. Conclusion: The modified mulimix technique effectively reduces postoperative plasma inflammatory mediators, interleukin-2 and interleukin-6, and results in decreased postoperative pain, thus reducing the postoperative analgesia consumption Abbreviations: OBA - Opioid based anesthesia; OFA - opioid-free anesthesia; IL-2 - interleukin-2; IL-6 - interleukin-6; VAS - visual analogue scale Keywords: Bariatric surgery, interleukin, Mulimix, opioid, pain, immunological response. Citation: Seyam SHA, Hassan AE, Elsayed MM. Assessing the impact of opioid-free anesthesia using the modified Mulimix technique on postoperative pain in bariatric surgery patients: a correlative randomized double-blinded trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):721−726; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2516 Received: March 04, 2024; Reviewed: May 18, 2024; Accepted: May 19, 2024

Evaluating the Impact of Opioid-free Anesthesia Protocol on Provider Utilization: A Pilot Study at 2 Southeastern US Hospitals

Objective: Perioperative opioid medications are implicated as contributors to the opioid crisis and associated with significant negative side effects that complicate recovery, leading to increased hospitalization and healthcare costs. Implementation of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) hospital protocols may be an effective strategy to familiarize healthcare providers with non-opioid strategies for treating perioperative pain. Methods: An exploratory, descriptive pilot study was conducted at 2 Southeastern US Hospitals with a preexisting OFA policy. An electronic survey was developed and distributed to the anesthesia departments with an OFA protocol for bariatric surgical procedures. The responses (n=14) were analyzed, and the qualitative data thematically categorized. Results: Two major and one minor theme emerged. Theme 1: utilizing an OFA protocol led to increased familiarity and a desire to utilize OFA in other surgical populations. Theme 2: implementation of regional anesthesia into a multimodal OFA plan improves pain management and perioperative team support. Minor Theme: opioid sparing may be preferable to OFA techniques among a minority of anesthesia providers. Conclusion: OFA protocol promoted familiarity and favorable attitude towards OFA techniques. Participants reported an increased willingness to utilize OFA beyond protocol requirements. Therefore, hospital protocol may be a useful tool to drive evidence-based anesthesia and pain management practice change.

Opioid-free general anesthesia: considerations, techniques, and limitations.

To discuss the role of opioids during general anesthesia and examine their advantages and risks in the context of clinical practice. We define opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) as the absolute avoidance of intraoperative opioids. In most minimally invasive and short-duration procedures, nonopioid analgesics, analgesic adjuvants, and local/regional analgesia can significantly spare the amount of intraoperative opioid needed. OFA should be considered in the context of tailoring to a specific patient and procedure, not as a universal approach. Strategies considered for OFA involve several adjuncts with low therapeutic range, requiring continuous infusions and resources, with potential for delayed recovery or other side effects, including increased short-term and long-term pain. No evidence indicates that OFA leads to decreased long-term opioid-related harms. Complete avoidance of intraoperative opioids remains questionable, as it does not necessarily ensure avoidance of postoperative opioids. Multimodal analgesia including local/regional anesthesia may allow OFA for selected, minimally invasive surgeries, but further research is necessary in surgeries with high postoperative opioid requirements. Until there is definitive evidence regarding procedure and patient-specific combinations as well as the dose and duration of administration of adjunct agents, it is imperative to practice opioid-sparing approach in the intraoperative period.

Superiority of opioid free anesthesia with regional block over opioid anesthesia with regional block in the quality of recovery after retroperitoneiscopic renal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Opioids are the main analgesic drugs used in the perioperative period, but they often have various adverse effects. Recent studies have shown that quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has an opioid sparing effect. The aim of this study was to further evaluate the effect of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) combined with regional block on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery. Sixty patients undergoing elective retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery were divided into the opioid-free anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block group (OFA group, N.=30) and opioid anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block group (OA group, N.=30) using the random number table method. The main outcome measures were the quality of recovery assessed by Quality of Recover-40 (QoR-40) at the 24th postoperative hour. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to ambulate, and time to readiness for discharge. The QoR-40 score on the first postoperative day was significantly higher in the OFA group than that in the OA group (175.41±6.74 vs. 165.07±4.55; P<0.05). OFA also significantly reduced postoperative pain (P<0.05) and morphine consumption at both the 24th and 48th postoperative hour (P<0.05), as well as time to ambulate, and time to readiness for discharge (P<0.05). OFA with regional block is superior to opioid anesthesia with regional block in the quality of recovery after retroperitoneiscopic renal surgery.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia and Analgesic Quality During the Postoperative Period of Oncological Breast Surgery

&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Background: &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;Pain is one of the most common symptoms in cancer patients. We can understand it as a multifactorial phenomenon. Breast cancer surgical treatment generates real damage to the structures and activates nociception which can generate persistent pain. Current anesthetic management is based on the use of opioids, which generate a large number of complications that can severely affect this group of patients, increasing morbidity and mortality. Opioid-free techniques have been shown to reduce complications and generate optimal anesthetic-analgesic management as well as decrease postoperative misuse. The purpose of this research is to compare both approaches and evaluate their impact on this population group. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Methods: &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;Simple, prospective, randomized, controlled blind clinical trial in 30 patients undergoing oncological mammary quadrantectomy a. The patients were divided into two groups study, the first (group A) received balanced general anesthesia with opioids as an analgesic strategy, the other group (group B) received general anesthesia balanced opioid-free supplemented with a PECs II regional block and/or Serratus (BRILMA) according to the patient&amp;apos;s sonoanatomy, and ketamine-lidocaine as adjuvant drugs. Analgesia was assessed using the numerical pain scale at 2, 4, and 6 o&amp;apos;clock. The severity and impact of pain on the daily performance of patients were measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) short form in combination with clinical examination, the presence of postoperative complications, the length of stay in hours and the need for rescue with opioids. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Results: &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;35% of the patients in group A required analgesic rescue with Tramadol to improve pain postoperative, while in group B only 10% needed it. 33% of the patients in group A completed their postoperative period with nausea and vomiting, while in the opioid-free group the percentage was only 1%. Referring to the length of hospital stay from surgery to discharge, group A was hospitalized for a period of 25 hours (SD=21.2), while group B was there for 15.2 hours (SD=8.7). &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Conclusions:&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;. Use of opioid-free anesthesia along with adjuvant strategies (drugs and nerve blocks) represent a safe and effective anesthetic strategy related with a lower incidence of complications from the use of opioids in the postoperative period, a lower consumption of analgesic rescues, a decrease in the length of hospitalization and a greater degree of comfort for the patient. This protocol represents an alternative when it comes to providing good intra and postoperative conditions for such a susceptible group of patients.

Comparison of opioid-free and opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: arandomised controlled trial.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting occur frequently following thyroid and parathyroid surgery and are associated with worse patient outcomes. We hypothesised that opioid-free propofol anaesthesia would reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia in patients undergoing these procedures. We conducted a randomised, double-blinded controlled trial in adult patients scheduled to undergo thyroid and parathyroid surgery at two medical centres in mainland China. Patients were allocated randomly (1:1, stratified by sex and trial site) to an opioid-free anaesthesia group (esketamine, lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and propofol) or an opioid-inclusive group (sufentanil and propofol). Propofol infusions were titrated to bispectral index 45-55. Patients received prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting using dexamethasone and ondansetron and multimodal analgesia with paracetamol and flurbiprofen axetil. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first 48 h after surgery. We assessed 557 patients for eligibility and 394 completed this trial. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first postoperative 48 h was lower in the opioid-free anaesthesia group (10/197, 5%) compared with opioid-inclusive group (47/197, 24%) (OR (95%CI) 0.17 (0.08-0.35), p < 0.001), yielding a number needed to treat of 5.3. Additionally, opioid-free propofol anaesthesia was associated with a reduced need for rescue anti-emetics, lower rates of hypotension and desaturation after tracheal extubation, and higher patient satisfaction. Time to tracheal extubation was prolonged slightly in the opioid-free group. The two groups had similar postoperative pain scores and 30-day outcomes. Opioid-free propofol anaesthesia reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroid and parathyroid surgery. An opioid-free anaesthetic regimen can optimise anaesthetic care during thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Opioid Free Ptyregopalatine Ganglion Block Based Multimodal Anesthesia Versus Conventional Opioid Based Multimodal Anesthesia for Tonsillectomy Operations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Otolaryngology often involves adenotonsillectomies, surgical procedures aimed at addressing obstructive sleep-disordered breathing and underlying apnea in children. Pediatric anesthesiologists and otolaryngologists encounter challenges in managing pain post-adenotonsillectomy, especially due to the use of opioid medications in children who have an elevated baseline risk of airway obstruction and associated morbidity and mortality. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was conducted at Eldemerdash Hospital, Ain Shams University, Egypt, from September 2022 to August 2023. A total of 90 patients aged 5 - 13 years who underwent elective tonsillectomy surgery were randomly assigned to two groups, with 45 patients in each group. The first group, referred to as group A, received intravenous 1.0 μg/kg fentanyl, dexamethasone 150 μg/kg, and paracetamol 15 mg/kg. The second group, referred to as group B, received dexamethasone 150 μg/kg and paracetamol 15 mg/kg, with an opioid-free pterygopalatine ganglion block for multimodal anesthesia. The primary outcome measure of this study was the postoperative Wong-Baker scale at 1st, 3rd, and 24th hours. This study included 90 individuals with similar demographic profiles and comparable initial characteristics and surgical techniques in both groups (P > 0.05). Intraoperative heart rate, mean blood pressure, additional analgesia, postoperative Wong-Baker scale, postoperative rescue analgesia, and laryngospasm did not show significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of nausea, vomiting, hypoxia, and post-anesthesia care unit stay, with group B experiencing fewer of these issues (P < 0.05). Both conventional opioid-based multimodal anesthesia and opioid-free pterygopalatine ganglion block-based multimodal anesthesia are effective methods for providing analgesia during and after tonsillectomy surgery. The pterygopalatine ganglion block, the latter option, has been found to result in fewer postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, and hypoxia. Additionally, patients who receive this type of anesthesia typically require less time in the post-anesthesia care unit.