Opinions Of Surgeons Research Articles

Upper gastrointestinal training in the UK and Ireland: a Roux Group Study.

Surgical training programmes in the United Kingdom and Ireland (UK&I) are in a state of flux. This study aims to report the contemporary opinions of trainee and consultant surgeons on the current upper gastrointestinal (UGI) training model in the UK&I. A questionnaire was developed and distributed via national UGI societies. Questions pertained to demographics, current training evaluation, perceived requirements and availability. A total of 241 responses were received with representation from all UK&I postgraduate training regions. The biggest discrepancies between rotation demand and national availability related to advanced/therapeutic endoscopy and robotic surgery, with 91.7% of respondents stating they would welcome greater geographical flexibility in training. The median suggested academic targets were 3-5 publications (trainee vs consultant <3 vs 3-5, p<0.001); <3 presentations (<3 vs 3-5, p=0.002); and 3-5 audits/quality improvement projects (<3 vs 3-5, p<0.001). Current operative requirements were considered achievable (87.6%) but inadequate for day one consultant practice (74.7%). Reassuringly, 76.3% deemed there was role for on-the-job operative training following consultant appointment. Proficiency in diagnostic endoscopy was considered a minimum requirement for Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) yet the majority regarded therapeutic endoscopy competency as non-essential. The median numbers of index UGI operations suggested were comparable with the current curriculum requirements. Post-CCT fellowships were not considered necessary; however, the majority (73.6%) recognised their advantage. Current CCT requirements are largely consistent with the opinions of the UGI community. Areas for improvement include flexibility in geographical working and increasing national provisions for high-quality endoscopy training.

441. EXTENT AND BOUNDARIES OF LYMPH NODE STATIONS DURING MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY: A SURVEY AMONG DUTCH ESOPHAGEAL SURGEONS

Abstract Background The optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND), and the anatomical boundaries per lymph node station (LNS) during minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer remains a topic of debate. This study investigated the opinion of Dutch esophageal cancer surgeons on their routine LND extent and anatomical boundaries per LNS, during MIE. Methods In April 2023, an English web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted. Within all 15 Dutch hospitals performing MIE, two MIE surgeons were asked to participate. The routine LND extent (quantity, specific LNS) for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma, (dis)agreement with the TIGER definition, and anatomical boundaries for each LNS in six directions were inquired. Results Twenty-four Dutch MIE surgeons completed the survey (80% response rate). Consensus on the routine LND extent (85% or more of the participating surgeons) included the left and right paracardial, left gastric artery, celiac trunk, proximal splenic artery, common hepatic artery, subcarinal middle mediastinal paraoesophageal, lower mediastinal paraoesophageal, pulmonary ligament and upper mediastinal paraoesophageal LNSs. Other LNS were not widely considered routine. Although, certain anatomical boundaries were consistent among surgeons, the majority varied, even when agreeing on the TIGER definition. Conclusion Significant variations in surgical practice among Dutch esophageal surgeons, regarding their routine extent of LND and anatomical boundaries of LNSs during MIE were demonstrated. Variation may impact clinical outcomes, hampers uniform treatment strategies, and hinders comparison of performance assessments. This study highlights the need for an international follow-up study towards one uniform defined LND during MIE for esophageal cancer.

Extent and Boundaries of Lymph Node Stations During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Survey Among Dutch Esophageal Surgeons

BackgroundThe optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND) and the anatomic boundaries per lymph node station (LNS) during minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer remain a topic of debate. This study investigated the opinion of Dutch esophageal cancer surgeons on their routine LND extent and anatomic boundaries per LNS during MIE.MethodsIn April 2023, an English web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted. In each of the 15 Dutch hospitals performing MIE, two MIE surgeons were asked to participate. The routine LND extent (quantity, specific LNS) for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma, (dis)agreement with the TIGER definition, and anatomic boundaries for each LNS in six directions were queried.ResultsThe survey was completed by 24 Dutch MIE surgeons (80% response rate). Consensus on the routine LND extent ( ≥ 85% of the participating surgeons) included the left and right paracardial, left gastric artery, celiac trunk, proximal splenic artery, common hepatic artery, subcarinal middle mediastinal paraoesophageal, lower mediastinal paraoesophageal, pulmonary ligament, and upper mediastinal paraoesophageal LNSs. Other LNSs were not widely considered routine. Although, certain anatomic boundaries were consistent among the surgeons, the majority varied, even when they agreed on the TIGER definition.ConclusionSignificant variations in surgical practice among Dutch esophageal surgeons regarding their routine extent of LND and anatomic boundaries of LNSs during MIE were demonstrated. Variation may have an impact on clinical outcomes, hampering uniform treatment strategies and hindering comparison of performance assessments. This study highlighted the need for an international follow-up study toward one uniform defined LND during MIE for esophageal cancer.

Development and evaluation of a clinical decision support system for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis

The most frequent reason for individuals experiencing abdominal discomfort to be referred to emergency departments of hospitals is acute appendicitis, and the most frequent emergency surgery performed is an appendectomy. The purpose of this study was to design and develop an intelligent clinical decision support system for the timely and accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The number of participants which is equal to 181 was chosen as the sample size for developing and evaluating neural networks. The information was gathered from the medical files of patients who underwent appendicectomies at Shahid Modarres Hospital as well as from the findings of their appendix samples' pathological tests. The diagnostic outcomes were then ascertained by the development and comparison of a Multilayer Perceptron network (MLP) and a Support Vector Machine (SVM) system in the MATLAB environment. The SVM algorithm functioned as the central processing unit in the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that was built. The intelligent appendicitis diagnostic system was subsequently developed utilizing the Java programming language. Technical evaluation and system usability testing were both done as part of the software evaluation process. Comparing the output of the optimized artificial neural network of the SVM with the pathology result showed that the network's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 91.7%, 96.2%, and 95%, respectively, in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Based on the existing standards and the opinions of general surgeons, and also comparing the results with the diagnostic accuracy of general surgeons, findings indicated the proper functioning of the network for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The use of this system in medical centers is useful for purposes such as timely diagnosis and prevention of negative appendectomy, reducing patient hospital stays and treatment costs, and improving the patient referral system.

The Medico-Legalization of Sex in the Nineteenth-Century United States

AbstractThe rising field of medical jurisprudence in common law from late eighteenth century has led to a rearrangement of authority and epistemic power between lay and expert witnesses, in favor of the latter. Although the law had long relied on testimony from members of the community to establish the legal fact of a person's sex, the legal procedure of fact-making started to rely instead on the opinions of doctors, surgeons, and medical practitioners. This article closely reads medical jurisprudence books, U.S. case law, and U.S. newspapers from the nineteenth century to describe this expansion of medical experts’ authority to establish the legal fact of sex in vague cases. The article describes the spread of medico-legal technics of sex classification in three arenas of U.S. law: the law of marriage and divorce, cross-dressing, and defamation. The practice of legal sex classification was thus absorbed into medical expertise, and the meaning of sex in the law transformed from a socio-physical construct to a medical one. The mid-nineteenth-century decline of medical jurisprudence subsequently pushed the practice of sex classification outside the realm of law and into the jurisdiction of the medical profession, thus leaving sex classification mainly to doctors.

Poster 373: Perceptions &amp; Opinions on Cannabidiol Among Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgeons

Objectives: Cannabidiol (CBD) is a known pain modulator which is beginning to garner increased attention in the orthopaedic world, with many patients now presenting to clinics having tried CBD for pain relief. However, there may be a considerable knowledge gap with particular reference to orthopedic sports medicine surgeons and how they perceive the use of this therapeutic agent in clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to (1) examine the knowledge and beliefs of sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons with respect to the role of cannabidiol (CBD) in a multi-modal post-operative pain management regimen (2) deliver an educational component regarding CBD to practicing surgeons, and to (3) elucidate potential future barriers to the widespread use of this treatment modality by providing an anonymous forum for surgeons to voice their opinions. Methods: A three-component, 25-question online survey was distributed to fellowship-trained sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons. The first 20 questions were designed to assess baseline knowledge and opinions of sports surgeons regarding cannabidiol. These were followed by a 1-page summary sheet detailing the current legal status of CBD, as well as a brief literature review of its potential role in pain management within the field of orthopaedics. Lastly, 5 additional questions assessed whether the respondents’ opinions had shifted after learning more about CBD. A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used for one question (“Please indicate the likelihood you would recommend CBD as part of a pain management regimen.”), which was repeated before and after the summary sheet to see if respondents modified their answer after completing the educational component. Results: One hundred responses were collected from sports medicine surgeons. Most surgeons (76.2%) believe there is a role for CBD in post-operative pain management. While only 62.4% of respondents believe that CBD could be effective in managing acute pain and inflammation following injury, an overwhelming majority (94.1%) believed that CBD has a role in chronic pain management. A large majority stated that CBD would have no effect on soft tissue (89.1%) or bony (90.1%) healing post- operatively. Most surgeons admitted they were not knowledgeable about the mechanism (84.2%), modes of administration (73.3%), or their states’ laws (66.3%) concerning CBD. A minority (24.8%) believe that CBD has psychoactive properties and 18.8% believe CBD has addictive potential. While most surgeons (76.2%) did not believe they would be stigmatized if they were to suggest CBD to a patient, only 47.5% have ever suggested CBD to a patient. Notably, 94.1% of surgeons have encountered patients who reported trying CBD to treat pain. In the optional open-response section, 32 respondents elaborated on their concerns with most sentiments falling into three predominant themes: a) more evidence is required (10, 31.3%); b) stigmatization from patients (8, 25.0%); c) more regulation is required (5, 15.6%). After reading through the fact sheet, 51.4% of the survey respondents stated that their opinion on CBD had changed, and 62.9% stated they felt inclined to investigate the topic further on their own. Conclusions: A majority of sports medicine surgeons believe that CBD has a role in post-operative and chronic pain management. Surgeons are somewhat familiar with CBD, in part due to its remarkable prevalence among their patient populations, however there is clearly a knowledge gap, suggesting more education is necessary involving what is currently known about the subject and that more research should be targeted toward this developing industry. Current barriers to its routine use in clinical practice include unfamiliarity of the mechanism and dosing, limited evidence and regulation, and patient concerns or patient/surgeon stigmatization.

Differential Perspectives by Specialty on Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Korean Oligometastasis Working Group's Comparative Survey Study.

Despite numerous studies on the optimal treatments for oligometastatic disease (OMD), there is no established interdisciplinary consensus on its diagnosis or classification. This survey-based study aimed to analyze the differential opinions of colorectal surgeons and radiation oncologists regarding the definition and treatment of OMD from the colorectal primary. A total of 141 participants were included in this study, consisting of 63 radiation oncologists (44.7%) and 78 colorectal surgeons (55.3%). The survey consisted of 19 questions related to OMD, and the responses were analyzed using the chi-square test to determine statistical differences between the specialties. The radiation oncologists chose "bone" more frequently compared to the colorectal surgeons (19.2% vs. 36.5%, p=0.022), while colorectal surgeons favored "peritoneal seeding" (26.9% vs. 9.5%, p=0.009). Regarding the number of metastatic tumors, 48.3% of colorectal surgeons responded that "irrelevant, if all metastatic lesions are amendable to local therapy", while only 21.8% of radiation oncologist chose same answer. When asked about molecular diagnosis, most surgeons (74.8%) said it was important, but only 35.8% of radiation oncologists agreed. This study demonstrates that although radiation oncologists and colorectal surgeons agreed on a majority of aspects such as diagnostic imaging, biomarker, systemic therapy, and optimal timing of OMD, they also had quite different perspectives on several aspects of OMD. Understanding these differences is crucial to achieving multidisciplinary consensus on the definition and optimal management of OMD.

Treatment of buccal mucosal carcinomas: A survey amongst head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands.

Currently, there is no up-to-date guideline for the treatment of buccal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) in the Netherlands. A questionnaire was used to investigate the opinions of Dutch head and neck surgeons on BMSCC of the cheek treatment. A questionnaire was sent to all 91 head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands. Their opinions on surgical tumor-free margins, through-and-through defects, and indications for local adjuvant therapy were questioned. The response rate was 51%. To prevent a through-and-through defect, 67% of the surgeons would accept a deep clinical (macroscopic) margin of ≤5 mm. The less adverse histological characteristics a tumor has, the less consensus there is amongst the surgeons for local adjuvant treatment in case of close margins. There is no consensus amongst Dutch head and neck surgeons about the optimal treatment for BMSCC of the cheek. There are different opinions on acceptable resection margins, indications for a through-and-through defect, and indications for adjuvant treatment. BMSCC of the cheek treatment should be more uniform and less surgeon dependent. N/A.

Survey of New Zealand Arthroplasty Surgeons on Surgeon-Level Outcome Reporting

BackgroundSurgeon-specific outcome monitoring has become increasingly prevalent over the last 3 decades. The New Zealand Orthopaedic Association monitors individual surgeon performance through 2 mechanisms: arthroplasty revision rates derived from the New Zealand Joint Registry and a practice visit program. Despite remaining confidential, surgeon-level outcome reporting remains contentious. The purpose of this survey was to evaluate the opinions of hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons in New Zealand on the perceived importance of outcome monitoring, current methods used to evaluate surgeon-specific outcomes, and potential improvements identified through literature review and discussion with other registries. MethodsThe survey consisted of 9 questions on surgeon-specific outcome reporting, using a five-point Likert scale, and 5 demographic questions. It was distributed to all current hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons. There were 151 hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons who completed the survey, a response rate of 50%. ResultsRespondents agreed that monitoring arthroplasty outcomes is important and that revision rates are an acceptable measure of performance. Reporting risk-adjusted revision rates and more recent timeframes were supported, as was including patient-reported outcomes when monitoring performance. Surgeons did not support public reporting of surgeon-level or hospital-level outcomes. ConclusionThe findings of this survey support the use of revision rates to confidentially monitor surgeon-level arthroplasty outcomes and suggest that concurrent use of patient-reported outcome measures would be acceptable.

Perception of laypersons, orthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons about the transverse occlusal plane

Transverse occlusal plane (TOP) should be parallel to the true horizontal lines of the face (ie, the interpupillary line [IP] and commissural line [CL]). This study aimed to investigate the opinions of laypersons, orthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons about the impact of imbalanced IP and CL on facial attractiveness. We used a symmetrical face image as the reference. Then, using Photoshop software, we constructed the following 6 photographs: TOP roll relative to CL and IP (3° and 6°) with parallelism of CL and IP, CL roll relative to TOP and IP (3° and 6°) with parallelism of TOP and IP, TOP and CL roll relative to IP (3° and 6°). Consequently, the participants rated the photographs on the basis of their attractiveness. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the ratings. One hundred thirty-one laypersons, 22 orthodontists, and 20 surgeons participated in this study. It was found that 51.1% of laypersons, 86.4% of orthodontists, and 70% of surgeons selected the reference photograph as the most beautiful, followed by the photograph with a 3° roll of CL relative to TOP, with parallelism of TOP and IP (29% of laypersons, 31.8% of orthodontists, and 35% of surgeons). Most participants selected the reference photograph as the most beautiful and realized a roll in the horizontal planes up to 3°. The parallelism of the esthetic line of dentition relative to interpupillary is preferred over its parallelism relative to CL.

Expert Opinion on the Identification and Pharmacological Management of Worsening Heart Failure

Worsening heart failure (WHF) is a distinct under-diagnosed and under-treated condition, independent of location of care. Heart failure (HF) progression is punctuated by repeated WHF events, each resulting in reduced cardiac function. One-third of the patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction experience a decompensation event. These decompensation events often result in the emergency department visits and HF hospitalization. Despite its inclusion in recent guidelines, there is no precise definition of WHF or its various forms. It is worth noting that WHF signals a need for treatment optimization as per guideline-directed medical therapy and the addition of novel drugs like a stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase that benefit this high-risk patient population. This practical document is based on the expert opinion of cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, and physicians that discussed the definition, assessment, pharmacological management, and monitoring of WHF patients in a hospitalized setting. In addition, there is also a need for an expert opinion for the management of WHF in an outpatient setting.

Surgical wound closure in advanced peritonitis

To date, mortality in widespread peritonitis is still high (15-20%) and increased up to 70-80% in case of septic shock. Surgeons actively discuss wound closure technique in these patients considering intraoperative findings and severity of illness. The authors present scientific data and opinions of national and foreign surgeons regarding the methods of laparotomy closure. There are still no generally accepted criteria for choosing the method of laparotomy closure in secondary widespread peritonitis. Indications and clinical efficacy of each procedure require additional research.

Features of surgical patients of COVID-19 patients

The novel coronavirus pandemic has significantly increased the workload of surgical service worldwide. Restrictive measures led to postponement of elective surgical and diagnostic interventions and reduced the number of emergency manipulations around the world. Large-scale studies identified optimal period for postponing surgical procedures and advisability of this postponement. The authors present opinions of surgeons and their views on treatment strategy for various elective and emergency surgical interventions in abdominal surgery, traumatology-orthopedics and oncology. The main factors reducing perioperative mortality in patients with a new coronavirus infection are observance of anti-epidemic measures by patients and medical personnel, competent use of personal protective equipment, as well as adherence to protocols and algorithms for the treatment of these patients.

Difference in Perception of Nasal Aesthetic Appearance Between Surgeons and Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center Perspective.

Patient satisfaction is an essential outcome measure after a rhinoplasty. Yet it is not known whether the opinions of rhinoplasty patients and surgeons on nasal aesthetic appearance differ. The aim of this study was to determine the differences between patients and surgeons in their perception of nasal aesthetic appearance. A retrospective cohort of 300 patients seen in consultation for cosmetic, functional, or combined cosmetic and functional rhinoplasty at a single tertiary care center from June 2017 to June 2020 was studied. Based on preoperative patient images, 6 surgeons with varying levels of expertise assessed nasal aesthetics utilizing a modified Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey for nasal cosmesis (SCHNOS-C). These scores were then compared to the patient-reported SCHNOS-C scores. The cosmetic, functional, and combined subgroups consisted of 100 patients each. The mean [standard deviation] age was 35.4 [13.7] years and 64% were women. The modified SCHNOS-C scores were well-correlated among the 6 surgeons but showed only weak correlations of 0.07 to 0.20 between patient-reported scores and scores assessed by the surgeons. Compared with the surgeon's scores, patients in the cosmetic subgroup perceived their nasal aesthetic problems to be more severe whereas the those in the functional subgroup perceived their nasal aesthetic problems to be milder compared with the surgeons' assessment. Our findings suggest that patients and surgeons perceive nasal cosmesis differently. This difference should be considered carefully when planning rhinoplasty or assessing its outcome.

OGBN O04 Upper Gastrointestinal Training in the UK &amp; Ireland – a Roux Group Study

Abstract Background Surgical training programmes in the United Kingdom and Ireland (UK&amp;I) are in a transition period evidenced by new surgical curricula. This study is the first to collate the opinions of UK&amp;I trainee and consultant surgeons regarding the current Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) training model. Methods A questionnaire was developed and distributed via national UGI societies and the social media platform, Twitter. A total of 241 responses were received with all UK&amp;I regions represented. Results The median time to Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) of 13 years was considered reasonable (50.2%), however the majority (67.2%) found training to be unfocused. The suggested targets for publications, presentations and audits were 3–5 (trainee vs consultant &amp;lt;3 vs 3–5, p&amp;lt;0.001), &amp;lt;3 (&amp;lt;3 vs 3–5, p=0.002) and 3–5 (&amp;lt;3 vs 3–5, p&amp;lt;0.001) respectively. The majority (61.9%) considered a higher academic degree advantageous but felt it should not be compulsory. Interestingly, most respondents (63.5%) had or planned to undertake one. Crucially, there were geographical discrepancies in access to training, particularly in bariatrics, robotic surgery, and endoscopy. Proficiency in diagnostic endoscopy was deemed essential for CCT and consultant practice (81.7% and 67.6% respectively). The current index UGI operative requirements were felt to be achievable (87.6%) but inadequate for day one consultant practice (74.7%), an opinion shared by both the trainee and consultant groups (p=0.662). Reassuringly, most respondents (76.3%) deemed there to be a role for on-the-job operative training following consultant appointment. Post-CCT fellowships were not considered necessary for consultant appointment, however the majority (73.6%) again recognised its advantage. Conclusions While variations were seen in the opinions of trainee and consultant surgeons, the current CCT requirements as outlined by the Joint Committee on Surgical Training are consistent with the overall perspective of the UGI community. Areas for improvement include flexibility in geographical working and provisions for endoscopy training, to ensure equal access.

Music in the Operating Room: Comparing the Opinions of Surgeons, Anesthesiologists, and Nurses.

Music is part of operating room (OR) culture; however, some personnel may perceive music as a distraction. A single institution survey of surgeons (SURG), anesthesia (ANES), and nursing (NURS) regarding attitudes on music in the OR. There were 222 responses (67% response rate) agreeing that music in the OR should be allowed (91%), is calming (75%), and helps with focus (63%). Most did not feel music was distracting (63%) or unsafe (80%). SURG were more likely to state that surgeons should decide (46.7%) if music should be played, whereas ANES and NURS (81%) were more likely to feel decisions should be made collaboratively (P < .001). Most OR personnel feel positively towards music. Surgeons were more likely to believe the decision to play music should be the surgeon's choice. The majority of OR staff agreed with collaborative decision-making, aligning with creating a safe OR culture.

Медико-социологическая оценка деятельности хирургов в период пандемии COVID-19

Background: The article considers the results of a survey of surgeons of non-infectious multidisciplinary hospitals in Volgograd, carrying out their activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aim: Тo study the opinion of surgeons of surgical departments of non-infectious multidisciplinary hospitals, about satisfaction with their work, conditions of medical activity, about security, availability of planned surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic and the main factors affecting them. Methods: Тhe study was conducted using a questionnaire method with the participation of 47 surgeons of surgical departments of non-infectious multidisciplinary hospitals in Volgograd, working during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-2022. Statistical (Microsoft Excel 365) and graphoanalytic methods were used. Results: When analyzing the questionnaires, it was found that only 32.6 % of surgeons were satisfied with their work, 47.8 % were partially satisfied, and 19.6 % were not satisfied. In turn, 69.6 % of surgeons consider the operating units of the departments to be not fully provided with all the necessary equipment, 15.9 % consider the provision to be complete, 15.9 % refrain from answering. Conclusion: During the discussion, proposals were made to increase the satisfaction of surgeons with their professional activities, to improve the efficiency, quality and safety of planned surgical services.

Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery in Mexico and Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020): Results from AMHPB survey.

The Mexican Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AMHPB) conducted a survey, aiming to gather experience and opinions of HPB surgeons about HPB surgery in the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic year. An online survey was conducted (33 items: demographics, patient referral, COVID-19 screening and limitations, hospital occupancy and surgical practice) to AMHPB members and attendees of the previous meetings of the Society through a self-administered questionnaire. Answers were excluded if respondents were not from Latin America. 88 participants answered (47.5 ± 10 years, 94% male and 65.9% Mexicans). About 8% worked in COVID-19 converted hospitals. About 1.1% did not perform pre-operative COVID-19 testing. Polymerase chain reaction (33%) was the most common COVID-19 pre-operative test. The number of patient referrals decreased 62.5%. About 29.5% had one patient who died from COVID-19 during preoperative surgical evaluation. About 64.7% answered that surgical case volume decreased. About 17% and 23% respondents considered that surgical morbidity and mortality increased, respectively. Hospital resources and COVID-19 infection were responsible for change in surgical outcomes. Lack of ICU beds (54%) was the most common cause of surgical cancellation. COVID-19 had a strong negative impact on HPB surgery in Mexico and Latin America in terms of patient reference, case volume and surgical outcomes.

A Promising Future for Hands-On At-Home Training in Pediatric Surgery.

Sufficient training is needed to acquire and retain the procedural skills needed for the surgical correction of congenital anatomical malformations. This study aims to assess the opinions of trainees and pediatric surgeons on the use of simulation-based continued at-home training, which can help to acquire these skills. This study consisted of two parts. First, an international survey among trainees and pediatric surgeons assessed their opinions on simulation-based at-home training for pediatric surgical procedures (5-point Likert scale). Second, participants of pediatric colorectal courses were instructed to practice the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty procedure at-home on a simulation model and, subsequently, complete a questionnaire regarding their opinions on continuous at-home training (5-point Likert scale). A total of 163 participants (83% pediatric surgeons) completed the international survey (response rate 43%). Overall, participants considered the training useful for both laparoscopic (mean 4.7) and open procedures (mean 4.2) and agreed that it may be used at home after a hands-on course (mean 4.3).Twenty participants completed the questionnaire on continued training (response rate 36%). All agreed that at-home training was of added value (mean 4.5) and that the skills were transferable to the clinical setting (mean 4.3). At-home training was regarded a suitable exercise after a hands-on workshop (mean 4.3), but less so without a workshop (mean 3.7, p=0.017). Participating trainees and pediatric surgeons were of the opinion that simulation models and at-home training have added value. This implies that simulation-based training may be used more often in pediatric surgical training.

Consensus-led recommendations defining practical principles of achieving optimal surgical outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery in the Asia–Pacific region

Recent innovations within the field of robotic surgery have particular relevance to colorectal surgery. Although a robotic approach has been associated with satisfactory outcomes, there remains a wide variation in levels of adoption. In particular, this study focuses on patient positioning, docking, and table placement, with the intent of understanding the strength of opinion of colorectal surgeons in the Asia–Pacific region to the practical application of these developments to achieve optimal surgical outcomes. Using a modified Delphi methodology, a steering group of colorectal surgeons with experience in robotic surgery from across the Asia–Pacific region identified 35 consensus statements. An online 4-point Likert scale questionnaire was distributed to surgeons in the Asia–Pacific region using convenience sampling. Respondents were excluded from further analysis if they did not perform colorectal surgery or had no experience in robotic surgery. A total of 140 responses (71.8% response rate) were received between August and October 2021. 22 statements attained a very high degree of agreement (≥ 90%). High agreement (< 90% and ≥ 75%) was achieved in another 12, and one failed to meet the consensus threshold (< 75%). A set of five recommendations were developed based on these results. The high levels of agreement demonstrate recognition amongst colorectal surgeons within the Asia–Pacific region of the potential advantage of recent improvements in robotic surgery technology to further improve surgical outcomes. The recommendations may inform a set of practical principles to help standardise the use of colorectal robotic surgery, which may also be relevant to other surgical fields.