Operative Mortality In Elderly Patients Research Articles

The optimal timing of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis

The elderly population with severe aortic stenosis (AS) requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) is increasing. The optimal timing of AVR in these patients has been under discussion. We retrospectively reviewed the data from severe AS patients (n=84) who underwent AVR with/without concomitant procedures from 2005 to 2010. The symptom status, preoperative data, operative outcome, late survival and freedom from cardiac events were compared between elderly patients (age ≥80years [n=31]) and younger patients (age <80years [n=53]). The operative mortality in elderly patients (3.2%) and younger patients (3.8%) was comparable. The symptoms in elderly patients were more severe and hospitalized heart failure (HF) was more frequently noted as the primary symptom (p=0.017). Patients with and without hospitalized HF differed significantly in late survival and freedom from cardiac events (p=0.001), but advanced age had no significant effect. The results of a Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that hospitalized HF was a significant predictor for cardiac events after AVR, irrespective of age (hazard ratio 6.93, 95% confidence interval 1.83-26.26, p<0.004). In elderly patients with severe AS, surgery should be recommended even in the presence of minimal symptoms and should be performed before the onset of life-threatening HF.

Is Prosthesis–Patient Mismatch a Clinically Relevant Entity?

In this issue of Circulation , Koch and associates1 from the Cleveland Clinic published a study on the relationship between prosthetic valve size and the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) after aortic valve replacement (AVR). The study was conducted with 1014 patients operated on from 1995 through 1998, completed 1 year later, and published now. DASI scores increased from a mean of 29 preoperatively to 46 postoperatively after a mean follow-up of 8.3 months. The investigators could find no obvious relationship between prosthetic valve size and postoperative DASI score. One of the limitations of the study was that prosthetic valve gradients and effective orifice areas were not measured by echocardiography to quantify prosthesis–patient mismatch. It is also interesting to note that more than two thirds of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional classes I and II preoperatively, and yet the DASI mean score before surgery was only 29 out of a maximum of 58.2. For this reason alone, it must be assumed that factors other than the aortic valve disease played a role in the DASI score. Nevertheless, this is not the first study to suggest that valve size plays no role in the clinical outcomes of AVR. See p 3221 Valve prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) is a term introduced by Rahimtoola in 1978 to describe a condition in which the in vivo prosthetic valve effective orifice area is smaller than that of the native valve.2 According to this broad definition, every patient with a prosthetic heart valve has PPM because the leaflets of both mechanical and bioprosthetic valves are mounted into frames that occupy …

Impact of small prosthetic valve size on operative mortality in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Does gender matter?

Objective: Ideal management of the elderly patient with a small aortic root remains controversial. This retrospective analysis was performed to determine whether small prosthetic valve size is related to outcome in patients 70 years of age or older undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Methods: Between December 1991 and July 1998, 366 patients 70 years of age or older (median age 77 years, range 73-81 years, 49% male) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass grafting with standard Carpentier-Edwards bovine pericardial valves (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Edwards Division, Santa Ana, Calif) (n = 277; 76%) or St Jude Medical mechanical valves (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn) (n = 89; 24%). Propensity scoring and multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the risks associated with implantation of 19-mm valves. Results: Operative mortality was 16.7% (17/102) in patients who received 19-mm valves and 3% (8/264) among those receiving ≥21-mm valves (P ≤ .0005). The univariable odds ratio for operative death for 19-mm versus ≥21-mm valves was 6.4 (95% CI 2.7, 15.4; P ≤ .0005). In the final multivariable model, receipt of a 19-mm valve alone was not a statistically significant predictor of operative death (odds ratio 2.1; 95% CI 0.7, 6.4; P = .21). However, the combination of male sex and 19-mm valve resulted in a significant risk of operative death (4/9 patients; odds ratio 17.5; 95% CI 2.2, 139; P = .007). Use of a 19-mm valve was not related to late death in either the univariable (hazard ratio 1.0; 95% CI 0.5, 2.0; P = .95) or the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.7; 95% CI 0.3, 1.8; P = .51). Conclusions: Implantation of a standard 19-mm aortic valve in elderly men with aortic stenosis may be associated with an increased risk of operative mortality. A higher performance valve and/or a root enlargement procedure should be considered in men with a measured 19-mm anulus. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:815-22)

Fifteen-year trends in risk severity and operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Trends in risk-severity and operative mortality (OM) were examined in 3330 consecutive patients aged 70 years and older who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) between 1982 and 1996. The proportion of elderly patients rose significantly over time (P<.001). Crude OM among the elderly was 7.2% in 1982 to 1986, fell to 4.4% in 1987 to 1991, but did not improve thereafter. Logistic regression analysis of OM was used to construct relative risk groups (low, medium, or high). The prevalence of high-risk elderly patients rose significantly over time (P=.001) from 16.2% in 1982 to 1986 to 19.5% in 1987 to 1991 and 26.9% in 1992 to 1996. OM in high-risk patients fell significantly (P=.044) from 17.2% in 1982 to 1986 to 9.1% in 1987 to 1991 and was 8.9% in 1992 to 1996. Contemporary independent predictors of OM among elderly patients were poor ventricular function (LV grade 2 to 3, odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 5.2; and LV grade 4, OR, 10.7; 95% CI, 4.4 to 26); previous CABG (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.0 to 7.0), female sex (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.8), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.8), and diabetes (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.7). Previous angioplasty was protective (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.9). OM in elderly patients has declined significantly in recent years despite an increase in the prevalence and severity of their risk factors. A careful weighing of risk, rather than advanced age alone, should determine who is offered surgical revascularization. In this regard, poor ventricular function and repeat CABG continue to have the greatest impact on OM in elderly patients.

Determinants of operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: Emphasis on the influence of internal mammary artery grafting on mortality and morbidity

Coronary artery bypass grafting has been performed for elderly patients (≥70 years) with increasing frequency. From January 1986 through June 1993, 1399 elderly patients underwent isolated coronary bypass grafting. Of these patients, 823 had saphenous vein grafts alone and 576 had internal mammary artery grafting, including unilateral ( n = 546) and bilateral ( n = 28). Overall operative mortality was 8.86%. Operative mortality for unilateral internal mammary artery grafting (6.41%) was lower than for saphenous vein grafting only (9.96%, p = 0.021) and bilateral internal mammary artery grafting (21.43%, 6/28, p = 0.018). Fewer patients undergoing internal mammary artery grafting had postoperative complications (low cardiac output, intraaortic balloon pumping, and neurologic complications) than patients having saphenous vein grafting only. To determine risk factors for mortality and the influence of internal mammary artery grafting on the outcome, we analyzed 55 variables (27 preoperative, 15 intraoperative, and 13 postoperative) by univariate analysis. Significant variables (age, gender, height, weight, surface area, diabetes, obesity, body mass index, history of congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or arrhythmia, functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, stenosis of the left anterior descending or right coronary artery, emergency operation, reoperation, number of grafts, perfusion time, and bilateral or right internal mammary artery grafting) were included in a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis. The logistic regression demonstrates that those preoperative (history of congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction, low ejection fraction, female gender, and old age), intraoperative (long cardiopulmonary bypass time, emergency operation, reoperation, and use of right internal mammary artery grafting), and postoperative (postoperative complications) variables are independently associated with higher mortality. This study reveals the high-risk groups in elderly patients undergoing coronary bypass and suggests that a left internal mammary artery graft in combination with saphenous vein grafting may achieve a lower operative mortality and morbidity than other procedures in selected elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1994;108:73-81)

Risk factors for operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing internal mammary artery grafting

From January 1986 through June 1992, 512 elderly patients (70 years and older) underwent internal mammary artery grafting (IMAG). The operative mortality in these patients was 7.62% (39 of 512), which was significantly higher than that (1.97% [60 of 3,047];p < 0.0001) in younger patients (under 70 years old). To investigate the risk factors in the elderly, the data from the 512 patients were evaluated by univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression. Of 53 variables analyzed, nine preoperative variables (age, smoking history, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction. New York Heart Assotiation functional class, ejection fraction, left main artery disease, stenosis of the left anterior descending artery, and reoperation), three intraoperative variables (emergency operation, bilateral IMAG, and right IMAG), and nine postoperative variables were significantly associated with the higher mortality (p < 0.05). In particular, the operative mortality was significantly higher in the patients undergoing right IMAG (21.62% [8 of 37]) than that in patients only undergoing left IMAG (6.53% [31 of 475];p < 0.004). The significant preoperative and intraoperative variables and the variables that have a tendency for correlation (p < 0.2) to mortality were included in a stepwise multiple logistic regression. The regression analysis demonstrated mat right IMAG, reoperation, history of myocardial infarction, age, left main artery disease, history of smoking, and postoperative complications are the risk factors for the elderly undergoing IMAG. Therefore, particular care should be taken in those patients scheduled to undergo IMAG. The role of right IMAG in the elderly should be further clarified before universal acceptance of the technique in these patients.

Monitoring operative risk in the elderly.

To reduce operative mortality in elderly patients, a system of preoperative staging, based on invasive monitoring, was developed. All of the 148 consecutive patients studied had been cleared for surgery by standard assessment, but only 13.5% had normal measured, hemodynamic, respiratory, and oxygen transport function. Mild physiologic aberrations, not requiring a delay in surgery, or more severe abnormalities, indicative of high operative risk, were found in 63.5% of the patients. Advanced and incorrigible functional defects found in the remaining 23% made them unacceptable risks for major surgery under general anesthesia, and all who underwent the planned operation in spite of the warning died. Invasive preoperative assessment of elderly patients discloses a high percentage of serious physiologic abnormalities requiring a delay in some and cancellation of the operation in others.