Operating Room Staff Research Articles

Investigation of Radiation Exposure of Medical Staff During Lateral Fluoroscopy for Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery

Background/Objectives: In spinal surgery, it is especially crucial to insert implants in the correct location. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is often necessary to safely perform spinal surgery because of serious complications that can occur if the screw deviates. However, the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy comes at the cost of radiation exposure to the surgeons and operating room staff. Therefore, it is desirable for spinal surgeons to understand the characteristics of radiation in order to minimize patient and medical staff exposure. This study aimed to create an aerial radiation dose distribution map for lateral fluoroscopy, a commonly used technique for posterior spinal fusion. Methods: A human body-equivalent phantom was placed in a prone position on the Jackson Table. The measurement method used was a lateral fluoroscopic evaluation, assuming posterior spinal fusion. Measurements were taken at three levels: 80 (gonadal), 100 (thoracoabdominal), and 150 cm (lens and thyroid). Results: The highest radiation doses were received by primary surgeons. The scrub nurse was the next most exposed. Conclusions: We developed an aerial dose distribution map for lateral fluoroscopy in posterior spinal fusion. Radiation exposure was the highest among primary surgeons.

Digital Flexible Ureteroscope: Evaluating Factors Responsible for Damage and Implementing a Mandatory Certification Program for Usage.

Objective: Digital flexible ureteroscopes (DFUs) play a crucial role in endourological procedures, and scope breakages are often avoidable with proper measures in place. We aimed to evaluate the effect of mandatory training on DFU durability and to assess the influence of various factors on instrument damage. Materials and Methods: Mandatory training involving instructional videos on DFU care was introduced for all processing and operating room staff handling DFUs. Only certified personnel were allowed to handle DFUs, with meticulous usage documentation. The average annual usage of each DFU was compared pre and post program implementation. We examined factors such as patient demographics, procedure details, and operator experience impacting scope life using negative binomial regression. Results: The average usage of DFU increased by 21%, from 6.38 to 7.74 cases. We found that post-graduate year stood out as a significant predictive factor (estimate = 3.28, p = 0.04). Moreover, the streamlined model revealed that previous ureteral-stent use (estimate = 0.94, p < 0.001), struvite stones (estimate = 3.08, p = 0.01), and a higher number of stones (estimate = 0.11, p = 0.04) were associated with an increased number of procedures before DFU breakage, whreas in situ lithotripsy in the lower calyx was associated with a reduced number of procedures before DFU breakage (estimate = -1.11, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Implementing a mandatory training program showed an increase in DFU durability by 21%, suggesting a potential reduction in annual repair and replacement costs by the same percentage. Furthermore, outcomes were more favorable when experienced practitioners conducted treatments, especially in cases involving struvite stones.

Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Surgical Smoke: Bibliometric Analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to examine the studies on surgical smoke by bibliometric analysis and science mapping methods. DesignBibliometric analysis and science mapping methods study. MethodsData were obtained by searching the SCOPUS database. The keywords “surgical smoke,” “operating room,” “operating room staff,” and “nurse” were used. Due to the ongoing scientific flow to the database, the search was performed on December 25, 2023 as a single day. FindingsAs a result of the research, a total of 51 studies were reached. We found 49 research articles and 2 review publications in the field of nursing and medicine. Most publications related to surgical smoke were published in 2021 (21.5% n: 11), and the journals with the highest number of publications were the Journal of Perioperative Nursing (5.9% n: 3) and AORN Journal (5.9% n: 3). The most common keyword in the studies was “surgical smoke.” "Surgical smoke" was used in common with all other keywords, the most publications on the subject were made in the United States, the most publications were made in English (92% n: 47), and the most citations were made by Barrett and Garber in 2003 with 250 citations (25.4%). ConclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on surgical smoke, highlighting its prevalence in recent literature. The findings underscore the need for continued investigation and awareness among health care professionals. The results obtained are important in terms of understanding the current situation in the relevant literature and will provide resources for new studies to be carried out by nursing and other surgical team members in the future.

Exploring operating room staff engagement in the planning and design of the built environment in Australia: Development of a constructivist grounded theory.

This study aimed to explore Australian health professionals' perceptions and experiences regarding built environment planning for operating rooms. We conducted semi-structured interviews and a focus group using exploratory qualitative methods, involving 16 participants: anaesthetists, surgeons, nurses, theatre technicians and designers of operating rooms. Four core concerns of participants were analysed: Engagement, Respect & Collaboration; Foreseeing & Responding to Safety Concerns; Enhancing Design Planning to Minimise Internal & External Consequences; and Ambiguous Application of Standards in Operating Room Design Planning. Health professionals highlighted safety impacts related to patients and staff due to the built environment and emphasised the need for improved engagement, respect and collaboration in design processes. Consideration needs to be given to the lived experiences of health professionals in design planning to address safety concerns effectively. Hierarchies and cultural factors were identified as barriers to inclusive design processes.

More is less: image enhancement technology reduces radiation exposure during anterior lumber interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXTFluoroscopy and radiation exposure occur during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Image enhancement technology is available that can potentially reduce radiation exposure. PURPOSEThe purpose of this study is to evaluate radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times comparing standard fluoroscopy (FL) with a low dose image enhancement platform (LD). STUDY DESIGNRetrospective review of prospectively maintained database. PATIENT SAMPLEConsecutive patients undergoing ALIF with either standard fluoroscopy or low dose image enhancement technology. OUTCOME MEASURESRadiation dispersion and fluoroscopy times in ALIF patients with standard fluoroscopy and low dose image enhancement technology. METHODSA retrospective review of a prospective database on consecutive patients who have undergone ALIF, stratified into 2 groups: subjects with standard fluoroscopy (FL), and low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology (LD). RESULTSA total of 487 ALIF patients were included (FL: 372 vs. LD: 115). LD patients were significantly older (66 vs. 60 years), with more deformity cases (28% vs. 12%), and less degenerative cases (71% vs. 87%), all p<.05; no differences in sex, BMI, or the number of levels operated on between groups. Fluoroscopy time (sec) was significantly higher in LD (51.4 vs. 45.5), with a statistically significant reduction in radiation (mGy) compared to FL (23.3 vs. 48.2), both p<.05. Furthermore, the results showed that radiation dispersion is increasingly reduced as fluoroscopy time increases in LD compared to FL (12%, 56%, and 65% reduction in radiation dispersion for fluoroscopy time <30 sec, between 30 to 60 sec, and >60 sec, respectively). CONCLUSIONSThe use of low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology significantly reduces the cumulative dose of radiation during ALIF compared to standard dose fluoroscopy. Also, radiation dispersion increasingly decreases as fluoroscopy time increases using low dose image enhancement technology. Low dose image enhancement technology improves the safety profile of ALIF for patients and operating room staff.

Effects of N95 Masks Versus Surgical/Loop Masks on Arterial Blood Gases and Adverse Symptoms in Operating Room Staff During Prolonged Usage: A Pilot Study.

The COVID-19pandemic continues to have a catastrophic impact on the global population. N95 masks are commonly used as filtering facepiece respirators for healthcare workers. At the end of long shifts, they have reported headaches, dizziness, fatigue, exhaustion, and physical and mental discomfort. There is a lack of data on the effects of N95 masks on blood gases in healthcare workers who wear masks for longer durations. We analyzed and compared the effects of continuously wearing N95 versus loop/surgical masks on various symptomology parameters and arterial blood gases for longer durations. This was a non-blinded, pilot, observational study at a single academic institution. Utilizing a survey, we collected information on operating room staff volunteers (demographics, mask use, and symptoms) and measured transcutaneous partial pressure carbon dioxide (tcPCO2) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) before and after the subject's shift to identify changes. Thirty-nine subjects enrolled in the study (N95 mask = 13, loop/surgical mask = 26). Overall, 69.2% of the subjects continuously wore a mask for five or more hours on their shift. There was a statistical difference with reported fatigue with exclusively wearing an N95 mask versus a loop/surgical mask (p=0.017). None of the other parameters showed a statistical difference between groups. The tcPCO2 was not statistically different between mask types at the beginning of the shift (p=0.922) or at the end of the shift (p=0.188), although tcPCO2 levels increased. The SpO2 was not statistically different between the mask types at the beginning of the shift (p=0.883) or at the end of the shift (p=0.505) with SpO2 decreasing. Individuals exclusively wearing an N95 mask reported a statistically greater number of complaints of fatigue after their shift. No statistical differences were observed in arterial blood gas parameters measured for SpO2 and tcPCO2 between mask groups. No definitive conclusions can be made due to the small sample size.

Evaluation of Operating Room Staff Awareness of Environmental Sustainability and Medical Waste Management.

This study aims to identify the obstacles to recycling and environmental sustainability habits in a university hospital's operating room (OR) environment in Turkey and lay the groundwork for potential solutions. A questionnaire was used to measure current views among the 140 OR staff members aged 20-54 years. The survey assessed awareness and behaviors of recycling at home and in the OR, as well as awareness of environmentally safe anaesthesia practices. Half of the participants believed that ORs significantly affected their carbon footprint, and most agreed that these environmental effects could be reduced. The primary barriers to recycling were inadequate knowledge, negative staff attitudes and insufficient services. Notably, 76% of participants paid attention to segregating OR waste, yet many lacked formal education about the environmental impact of their practices. Approximately 89% agreed that the environmental effects of ORs could be further reduced, with education being a critical need. The healthcare sector's contribution to carbon emissions and waste production is significant, especially in ORs. The lack of education regarding ecological implications is concerning. Implementing standardized training programs and enhancing recycling services can substantially reduce the environmental impact of ORs, highlighting the need for a more sustainable healthcare system.

Minimally invasive robot-assisted direct pars repair: illustrative cases.

Robot-assisted techniques are increasingly integrated into the field of spine surgery, with the potential benefits of increased accuracy and reduced radiation exposure. The objective of this study was to describe the technique of minimally invasive robot-assisted direct pars repair with 2 case illustrations. An 18-year-old male and a 42-year-old male, both with bilateral L5 spondylolysis, underwent successful minimally invasive L5 direct pars repairs with robotic assistance after conservative measures failed, and their cases are presented herein. A robot-assisted direct pars repair is a safe and effective technique for treating bilateral lumbar spondylolysis. The integration of robot-assisted techniques in spine surgery has the potential to improve outcomes, decrease surgical time, and reduce the amount of radiation exposure to operating room staff. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE2415.

Scoping review for the SAGES EAES joint collaborative on sustainability in surgical practice.

Surgical care in the operating room (OR) contributes one-third of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in healthcare. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) initiated a joint Task Force to promote sustainability within minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery. A scoping review was conducted by searching MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Elsevier, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus on August 25th, 2023 to identify articles reporting on the impact of gastrointestinal surgical care on the environment. The objectives were to establish the terminology, outcome measures, and scope associated with sustainable surgical practice. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. We screened 22,439 articles to identify 85 articles relevant to anesthesia, general surgical practice, and gastrointestinal surgery. There were 58/85 (68.2%) cohort studies and 12/85 (14.1%) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies. The most commonly measured outcomes were kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO2eq), cost of resource consumption in US dollars or euros, surgical waste in kg, water consumption in liters, and energy consumption in kilowatt-hours. Surgical waste production and the use of anesthetic gases were among the largest contributors to the climate impact of surgical practice. Educational initiatives to educate surgical staff on the climate impact of surgery, recycling programs, and strategies to restrict the use of noxious anesthetic gases had the highest impact in reducing the carbon footprint of surgical care. Establishing green teams with multidisciplinary champions is an effective strategy to initiate a sustainability program in gastrointestinal surgery. This review establishes standard terminology and outcome measures used to define the environmental footprint of surgical practices. Impactful initiatives to achieve sustainability in surgical practice will require education and multidisciplinary collaborations among key stakeholders including surgeons, researchers, operating room staff, hospital managers, industry partners, and policymakers.

Surgeons Who Perform Total Hip Arthroplasty Are at Risk for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, Especially When Using Automated Broaching.

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a serious concern for orthopedic surgeons. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) sets the safe exposure limit at 85 dB for 8 hours, yet operating rooms often surpass this limit. This study investigated if using an automated broaching system exposes orthopedic surgeons to dangerous decibel (dB) levels. A prospective study analyzed 138 intraoperative sound recordings from 92 total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeries and 46 baseline measurements at an academic-affiliated private practice, using the NIOSH Sound Level Meter (SLM) application and a microphone. The surgeries were categorized into manual and automated broaching. Key metrics measured included maximal dB level (MDL), peak sound pressure (LCpeak), average continuous sound (LAeq), and average weighted sound in an 8-hour period (TWA), along with dose representations, to identify hazardous noise levels. Of the 92 THA sound recordings, 50 used manual broaching and 42 employed automated broaching. Automated broaching exhibited higher noise levels, with an average MDL of 109.92 dBA, a LAeq of 86.09 dBA, a TWA of 76.48 dBA, and a projected noise dose of 137.74%. In contrast, manual broaching exhibited an average MDL of 105.87 dBA, a LAeq of 83.06 dBA, a TWA of 72.82 dBA, and a projected noise dose of 82.02%. This study highlights the auditory risks from automated broach and manual THA surgeries that orthopedic surgeons experience. Manufacturers should focus on reducing instrument noise when designing surgical tools and orthopedic surgeons and operating room staff should take measures to protect themselves from NIHL during surgery. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

Clearing the Smoke: The Evidence behind Risk of Electrocautery Smoke and Mitigation Strategies.

Electrocautery has been a useful, fundamental instrument utilized for surgical procedures since its implementation in the 1920s. However, concerns exist regarding the health hazards of the by-product smoke associated with the use of electrocautery. A comprehensive review of articles on the composition, mitigation, and effects of smoke was conducted using the PubMed search engine and excluding articles that did not meet the predetermined inclusion criteria. From January 1963 to December 2021, a total of 264 articles resulted, and a total of 69 articles were included in this narrative review. Surgical smoke contains volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic compounds, viral particles, and ultrafine particles. There has been some evidence of mutagenicity to bacterial cells during animal in vivo studies, and one human survey study has shown similar mutagenic effects. We also discuss additional hemostatic techniques that can be used, including the use of hemostatic and antithrombolytic agents, epinephrine infiltration, and the use of tourniquet when appropriate. Further studies should be conducted regarding human effects, but until the data are available, we recommend precautionary measures and actions to protect operating room staff from cautery smoke exposure.

Dry eye disease as an occupational risk factor in operating room nurses

ABSTRACT Clinical relevance Knowing occupational risks in a multifactorial disease such as dry eye disease is important for disease diagnosis and treatment. Background Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterised by tear film instability, adversely affecting visual function and quality of life. The operating room environment has many risk factors for DED such as air conditioning, constant humidity, constant room temperature, intense lighting, surgical smoke, anaesthetic gases and irritating chemicals, and prolonged mask use. This study investigates the ocular surface findings and blink patterns of operating room nurses at risk of DED. Methods A total of 68 nurses (operating room, n = 34; outpatient clinic, n = 34) were included in this study. The diagnosis of DED was assessed using a questionnaire, best-corrected visual acuity, tear break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining, meibomian gland assessment, Schirmer I test. All the tests were conducted in the same area. Results According to the ocular surface disease index, the rate of dry eye symptoms was significantly higher among operating room nurses than among outpatient nurses (70.5% vs 41.1%). Severe dry eye symptoms were more common in the operating room group. The meibomian gland score was higher in the operating room group (29.4% vs 5.9%). The numbers of blinks (30.91 ± 12.81 vs 21.05 ± 7.77) and incomplete blinks (8.76 ± 4.68 vs 5.76 ± 3.20) at rest were higher in operating room nurses. Conclusion The occupational risk for DED was high among operating room staff. National and international standards for the prevention and management of DED in personnel involved in health care services are needed.

Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Association Factors Among Operating Room Personnel of Ahvaz Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder among healthcare specialty nurses. Operating room staff are particularly susceptible to experiencing low back pain due to the nature of their work. Objectives: We conducted a study to investigate the prevalence of low back pain and the factors associated with it. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 323 operating room staff from five hospitals affiliated with Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Data was collected using a questionnaire developed by Tavakol et al. This questionnaire included demographic information and assessed the prevalence and dimensions of low back pain. The data was analyzed using IBM SPSS v.26. Results: The results showed that the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) was 74.3%. In this study, 64.8% of the personnel were women, 63.5% were married, and 72.4% had a bachelor's degree. Additionally, 87% had no history of smoking. The average age was 33.83 ± 7.02 years. There was a significant relationship between the prevalence of LBP and gender (P = 0.044), marital status (P = 0.0001), BMI (P = 0.008), age (P = 0.0001), shift work (P = 0.001), work experience (P = 0.0001), and the average number of shifts (P = 0.037). Conclusions: We found a high prevalence of LBP among operating room personnel, which is related to both individual and occupational factors. Our recommendations for nursing managers include modifying work shifts, allocating less physically demanding tasks to senior personnel and females, and implementing educational programs that focus on improving ergonomics and reducing physical strain.

Monitoring of surgical staff x-ray exposure in the operating room with DosiBadge

Surgical procedures involving the use of x-rays in the operating room (OR) have increased in recent years, thereby increasing the exposure of OR staff to ionizing radiation. An individual dosimeter makes it possible to record the radiation exposure to which these personnel are exposed, but there is a lack of compliance in the wearing of these dosimeters for several practical reasons. This makes the dose results obtained unreliable. To try to improve the rate of dosimeter wearing in the OR, the Dosibadge project studied the association of the individual dosimeter with the hospital access badge, forming the Dosibadge. Through a study performed at the Tours University Hospital in eight different ORs for two consecutive periods of 3 months. The results show a significant increase in the systematic use of the dosimeter thanks to the Dosibadge, which improves the reliability of the doses obtained on the dosimeters and the monitoring of personnel. The increase is especially marked with clinicians. Following these results and the very positive feedback to this first single-centre study, we are then planning a second multicentre study to validate our proof of concept on different sites, with the three brands of individual dosimeters used in France i.e. dosimeters supplied by Dosilab; Landauer and IRSN.

Not Your Usual Exposure: Tuberculosis Contact Investigation Related to Contaminated Bone Allograft

Background: Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission through contaminated bone allograft product is unusual and was first described in 2021 with a second outbreak in 2023. In July 2023, Michigan Medicine conducted contact tracing for healthcare personnel (HCP), patients, and visitors following exposure to an immunocompromised patient with surgical site infection and subsequent widely disseminated tuberculosis (bacteremia, pulmonary, lymphadenopathy) following spinal fusion with bone allograft in April 2023. The patient was in the emergency department, operating room (OR), and inpatient units for 9 days prior to initiation of Airborne Precautions (AP). Methods: Michigan Medicine is a 1,107 bed academic hospital. HCP are screened for tuberculosis with interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) testing upon hire and following tuberculosis exposure. Exposure testing includes baseline IGRA testing and follow-up testing at 10-12 weeks post exposure. Exposure criteria for this investigation was defined as sharing room airspace with the tuberculosis patient prior to initiation of airborne precautions or Central Sterile Processing Department (CSPD) staff involved with instrument decontamination without the use of a respirator. Of note, universal masking with surgical masks was not required during this time for staff and patients/visitors, with the exception of CSPD and OR staff. Contact tracing was performed by Infection Prevention and Occupational Health Services managed all test results and conversions. Results: 176 employees from perioperative care areas (n=30), CSPD (n=7), OR (n=9) and inpatient units (n=130) were IGRA tested. Five employee conversions were identified: one surgeon, one circulating OR nurse, two CSPD decontamination staff, and one respiratory therapist. At time of detection, none of the conversions had evidence of active tuberculosis. Additionally, 46 patients and visitors were tested with zero conversions. HCP compliance with IGRA testing was initially 15% before engagement from hospital and unit leadership and human resources. With intervention, employee compliance reached 100%. Conclusion: Despite standard use of surgical masks for OR and CSPD staff, aerosolization of infected bone graft material played an important role in tuberculosis transmission during surgery and instrument cleaning. Respiratory therapy practices in the ICU setting likely also increased risk for pulmonary tuberculosis transmission. Achieving 100% HCP compliance for baseline and follow-up IGRA testing is challenging and requires engagement of both unit and hospital leadership and human resources to ensure all HCP are tested.

Efficiency of Foot and Ankle Surgeries Completed on the Preoperative Stretcher vs Operating Room Table: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Extremity surgeons frequently operate on the preoperative stretcher rather than the operating room (OR) table. This study sought to identify differences between stretcher-based (SB) and OR table-based (TB) procedures with regard to time efficiency and OR team member preferences. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficiency of SB vs OR TB foot and ankle procedures. Fifty-two patients undergoing a hardware removal, isolated gastrocnemius recession, soft tissue procedure, or foreign body removal at our day surgery unit were included. Start time and exit time were recorded. "Start time" was the number of minutes between the patient entering the OR and first incision. "Exit time" was the number of minutes between the procedure ending and the patient exiting the OR. Surveys were disseminated to OR staff who participated in the included cases. The total measured time in the OR was an average 6 minutes shorter in the Stretcher group compared to the OR Table group (10 minutes vs 16 minutes, P < .001). SB procedures were associated with a significantly shorter start time (median difference = 4 minutes, P = .001), but not exit time (median difference = 1 minute, P = .058). No difference was found in actual surgical time. Thirty (96.8%) OR team members perceived SB procedures as enhancing OR efficiency, and 30 (96.8%) respondents considered SB procedures to be equal or superior to OR TB procedures in terms of patient safety. All would recommend or strongly recommend SB procedures. We found SB foot and ankle procedures to require less room time than OR TB procedures. Particularly for high-volume specialties, an average 6 minutes saved per case may meaningfully improve overall OR efficiency. Most OR team members believed that SB surgery improves OR efficiency and is the safer option for OR team members. Level II, randomized controlled trial, survey.

Operating Room Airborne Microbial Load: Nonscrubbed Staff Apparel Matters

BackgroundInfection is a leading cause of total joint arthroplasty failure. In previous studies, we found correlations between the level of contamination, concentrations of airborne particles, and the number of staff present. In this study, we focused on the apparel of nonscrubbed operating room (OR) staff to elucidate their contribution to the airborne microbial load. MethodsWe compared hospital-laundered scrubs to disposable coveralls using 2 methods. (1) Participants entered an isolation chamber with a controlled environment and completed tasks for 1 hour wearing both the approved and alternative OR attire. Settle plates collected viable contaminants that were shed by the participants during testing. (2) Lab members conducted standardized maneuvers in a functional OR that simulated typical movements of the nurse, anesthesiologist, implant representative, and entering/exiting staff. An airborne particle counter and settle plates were positioned throughout the OR. After 1 hour, the staff changed apparel and repeated the test. Each session of both phases consisted of 2 tests by the same individuals on the same day. ResultsThere was approximately a 10-fold difference in the settlement rate of viable particles between groups when employing the isolation chamber. The settle rate for scrubs was 5,519 ± 1,381 colony forming units (CFUs)/m2/h, while the settle rate for coveralls was 505 ± 55 CFUs/m2/h (P = .008). During testing in the OR, 218.7 ± 35 CFUs/m2/h were captured for scrubs, compared with 50.5 ± 13 CFUs/m2/h for the coverall (P < .01). The concentration of airborne particles collected for scrubs was 4,952.1 ± 495 particles/m3 and 1,065 ± 53 particles/m3 for the coveralls (P < .01). This was a 77% and 79% reduction for both measures, respectively. ConclusionsThe open nature of standard scrubs allows contaminated particles to escape into the OR environment, whereas the one-piece design of the coveralls restricts pathways of escape. The results of this study may be helpful when developing hospital infection prevention policies.

Surgical Intraoperative Handoff Initiative: Standardizing Operating Room Communication Using SHRIMPS.

Operating room (OR) handoffs are not universally standardized, although standardized sign outs have been proven to provide effective communication in other aspects of healthcare. We hypothesize that creating a standardized handoff will improve communication between OR staff. A frontline stakeholder approached our quality improvement team with concern regarding inadequate quality surgical technician handoffs during staff changes. An audit tool was created for a pilot cohort of 23 cases to evaluate surgical technician handoffs from May 2022 to November 2022. Handoffs occurred in 82.6% of cases. Elements of handoff varied significantly, with an average of 34.4% completion of critical handoff elements. Audits were reviewed with stakeholders to develop a standardized communication checklist, including domains regarding sponges, sharps, hidden items, replaced items, instruments, implants, medications, procedure overview, and specimens. An acronym of these domains, SHRIMPS, was affixed to each OR wall. In the initial Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, piloted in urology, general surgery, and neurosurgery, 100% of the 15 observed cases included handoff, averaging 76 seconds per handoff. Additionally, 100% of cases announced a handoff to the surgeon, and all elements were addressed 99.6% of the time. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle 2 involved implementation to all service lines. Of the 68 cases observed, 100% included handoff, averaging 69.4 seconds per handoff, with 98.2% of elements addressed, though only 97.1% of handoffs were announced. Little communication standardization exists within the OR, especially regarding intraoperative staff changes. Implementation of a standardized handoff between surgical technicians resulted in substantial improvement in critical communication during staff changes.

An Analysis of Water Used and Wasted at Operating Room (OR) Scrub Sinks and Call to Action for Reducing Water Waste.

To model the volume of water used and wasted during wet scrubs at operating room (OR) scrub sinks and identify factors for reducing water waste. Wasteful consumption of water by US healthcare systems has not been well characterized. This is a two-component observational study. The first was an observational study of handwashing practices and water usage at scrub sinks in the OR at a single medical center. The second component was a series of two anonymous surveys of surgeons and OR staff to assess hand scrub practices and perspectives. Data from both components were used to estimate the volume of water used and wasted annually at OR scrub sinks. The median total volume of water wasted at OR scrub sinks for 34,554 cases over one year is 337,595.6 L (interquartile range 139,010.0;911,210.5). This represents approximately 34.2% of the total volume of water usage associated with wet scrubs (i.e.,water used during scrubbing and wasted after the conclusion of the scrub). Other pertinent findings are that attending surgeons and OR staff perform water scrubs in 25.9% of cases; there are significant differences in scrub type preferences among OR users; the median volume of water wasted in a single wet scrub at timer-controlled sinks is 10 L; and significantly more water is wasted at timer-controlled sinks than knee-operated sinks. OR wet scrubs are a source of enormous water waste. We identified scrub sink characteristics and OR user beliefs and behaviors as modifiable factors for water waste reduction. We encourage all institutions and OR users to carefully examine their facility characteristics and practices to implement plans that will conserve water without compromising patient safety.

Better operating room efficiency and reduced staff demand: Individualised versus off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty.

The purpose of this pilot cross-sectional study was to compare the operating room (OR) efficiency and intraoperative staff task load when performing individualised versus off-the-shelf (OTS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A consecutive series of 28 patients randomised (1:1) to receive either OTS TKA or individualised TKA were included. The OR staff workload was assessed with the NASA Task Load Index (TLX), a subjective grading system assessing mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort and frustration on a scale from 0 (very low) to 20 (very high). The time for patient preparation, surgical time, closureand total OR time was recorded to assess OR efficiency. Effect sizes of differences between OTS and individualised TKA were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Patients in both cohorts were similar in age (OTS vs. individualised TKA (median [IQR]), 67 [63-76] vs. 71 [68-79]; p = 0.207) and body mass index (BMI) (29 [24-33] vs. 29 [26-31]; p = 0.807), and there were no significant differences in other preoperative characteristics. The OR staff perceived individualised TKA as less demanding than OTS TKA: Individualised TKA was rated significantly better across the six domains of the NASA TLX: mental demand by 5.6 points, physical demand by 6.3 points, temporal demand by 5.3 points, performance by 3.6 points, effort by 5.9 pointsand frustration by 5.8 points. Individualised TKA resulted in statistically significantly shorter mean total OR time (MD, 10 min; p = 0.018). The staff in the OR found that individualised TKA is less mentally, physicallyand temporally demanding than OTS TKA. The average total time spent in the OR during individualised TKA is 10 minless than during OTS TKA. This study constitutes a part of a larger registered randomised controlled trial comparing patient satisfaction following OTS versus individualised TKA (NCT04460989). Level III.