Open Thymectomy Research Articles

Results Of Minimally Invasive Vats Thymectomy In Miastenia Gravis Patients Compared With More Invasive Approaches - 10-Year Experience In A Single Center.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune, neurologic disease that causes a wide range of symptoms. While the transsternal, transcervical and thoracotomy approaches are accepted as effective, there is still debate regarding the VATS approach. We analyzed our center's surgical experience with thymectomy for myasthenia gravis, comparing the results of patients operated on using VATS and more invasive approaches, over a period of 10 years. A search of the department's surgical database for myasthenia gravis cases between January 2010 and January 2021, revealed a total of 40 cases. Twenty-four patients were included in the final analysis and were distributed into two groups: the VATS procedure group (group A) and the open procedure group (group B). The latter included sternotomy, thoracotomy, transcervical and hemiclamshell approaches. Only radical thymectomies were included. The established outcomes were clinical improvement defined as asymptomatic remission, reduction, or discontinuation of the medication necessary to achieve optimal symptom control. The median follow-up time was 27 months (ranging from 4 to 75 months). Videothoracoscopy radical thymectomy was performed on 12 patients. Complete remission with no medication was achieved in 1 case (8.3%), while 2 patients (16.7%) became asymptomatic with reduced medication. An improvement (reduced symptoms or decreased medication) was observed in 8 cases (66.6%). No change in clinical outcome was noted in 1 patient (8.3%). None of the patients reported worsening symptoms. Open thymectomy was performed on 12 patients. Complete remission with no medication was achieved in 1 case (8.3%), while 2 patients (16.7%) became asymptomatic with reduced medication. An improvement was noted in 6 cases (50%). No change in clinical outcome was observed in 3 patients (25%) whereas 2 of them (16.7%) experienced slightly better symptom control but with a significant increase in medication. One patient (8.3%) described the clinical results as without any significant change. None of the patients reported worsening symptoms. The videotoracoscopic approach in the treatment of myasthenia gravis is non-inferior compared to the open approach and effective in a long-term follow-up, offering all the additional benefits of less invasive surgery.

Our experience with robotic-assisted thymic surgery.

Thoracic surgery is increasingly influenced by the development of minimally invasive approaches which have also influenced surgery in the area of the anterior mediastinum. The previously standard approach to the thymus via partial sternotomy was gradually replaced by the videothoracoscopic approach in most cases. In recent years, robotically assisted surgery has been gaining ground worldwide in this area, as well. The aim of our paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of procedures in the field of the thymus, including their indications, and to share our first experience with robot-assisted thymus surgery. At the 3rd Department of Surgery, since the start of the robot-assisted thymus surgery program, 23 thymectomies have been performed using this approach, of which 17 were performed for thymoma, 3 for myasthenia gravis, and 3 for parathyroid adenoma localized in thymus tissue. From our experience and the available data, it follows that the length of hospitalization, the rate of complications and the resulting effect of robot-assisted procedures is comparable to VTS procedures; however, the robot-assisted surgery also allows for mini-invasive treatment even in significantly obese patients and in patients with advanced thymic tumors who would otherwise be indicated for open thymectomy.

National Multicenter Study on the Comparison of Robotic and Open Thymectomy for Thymic Neoplasms in Myasthenic Patients: Surgical, Neurological and Oncological Outcomes.

Thymectomy is the gold standard in the treatment of thymic neoplasm and plays a key role in the therapeutic path of myasthenia gravis. For years, sternotomy has been the traditional approach for removing anterior mediastinal lesions, although the robotic thymectomy is now widely performed. The literature is still lacking in papers comparing the two approaches and evaluating long-term oncological and neurological outcomes. This study aims to analyze the postoperative results of open and robotic thymectomy for thymic neoplasms in myasthenic patients. Surgical, oncological and neurological data of myasthenic patients affected by thymic neoplasms and surgically treated with extended thymectomy, both with the open and the robotic approach, in six Italian Thoracic Centers between 2011 and 2021 were evaluated. A total of 213 patients were enrolled in the study: 110 (51.6%) were treated with the open approach, and 103 (48.4%) were treated with robotic surgery. The open surgery, compared with the robotic, presented a shorter operating time (p < 0.001), a higher number of postoperative complications (p = 0.038) and longer postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.006). No other differences were observed in terms of surgical, oncological or neurological outcomes. The robotic approach can be considered safe and feasible, comparable to the open technique, in terms of surgical, oncological and neurological outcomes.

Robotic thymectomy: a review of techniques and results.

Thymectomy is a well-established therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary treatment of nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG) and in thymoma treatment. Although many surgical procedures for thymectomy have been identified, the transsternal method is still regarded as the gold standard. Minimally invasive procedures, on the other hand, have achieved popularity in the last decades and are now extensively used in this field of surgery. Among them, robotic thymectomy has been the most cutting-edge surgical procedure. Several authors and meta-analyses have shown that a minimally invasive approach to thymectomy is associated with improved surgical results and fewer complications in surgery compared to transsternal open thymectomy, without any substantial changes in myasthenia gravis complete rates of remission. Hence, in the present review of the literature, we aimed to describe and delineate the techniques, advantages, outcomes, and future perspectives of robotic thymectomy. Existing evidence suggests that robotic thymectomy will likely become the gold standard for thymectomy in early stage thymomas and MG subjects. Many of the drawbacks related to other minimally invasive procedures appear to be resolved by robotic thymectomy, and long-term neurological outcomes are satisfactory. In addition, improved vision and high dexterity of instrument movements enable safe and complete thymic tissue dissection, superior to standard thoracoscopic procedures. The access with minimally invasive surgery VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) or RATS (robot-assisted thoracic surgery) access in its various variants allows the extent of mediastinal fat resection due to the possibility of ectopic thymic foci in the mediastinum determining the long-term outcome in the group of patients operated on for myasthenia gravis. However, it was recommended to carry out better designed, multi-centre, randomized studies to arrive at definitive conclusions on robotic thymectomy for thymomas and myasthenia gravis treatment.

The short and long-term effects of open vs minimally invasive thymectomy in myasthenia gravis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thymectomy has been utilized as a treatment for Myasthenia Gravis (MG) for many decades, with both open and minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques currently used. Although MIS has shown improved short-term results, long-term effects remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare the post-operative and long-term outcomes of MIS versus open thymectomy in MG patients. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception till January 2022 for keywords related to MG and open or MIS thymectomy. Primary outcome was complete stable remission (CSR), and secondary outcomes were clinical improvement, complications, length of stay, operation time, and blood loss. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation was used to assess the certainty of evidence. 26 studies with 3588 patients were included in the analysis. At 1, 3 and 5years, there was no statistical difference noted in CSR between open versus MIS thymectomy. However, CSR was improved at 1year for MIS thymectomy in non-thymomatous MG (P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in rates of partial clinical improvement between techniques at 1-year. Although analyses on length of hospital stay and blood loss showed improvement following MIS thymectomy, operative time was shorter for open thymectomy. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis assessing long-term effects of MIS versus open thymectomy in MG patients. Given the lack of significant differences noted, either MIS or open thymectomy can be performed, based on surgeon preference. Further high-level, long-term research should be conducted to determine the benefit of each technique.

Assessment of length of stay and cost of minimally invasive versus open thymectomies in patients with myasthenia gravis in Florida.

Thymectomy has become a standard component in treatment for myasthenia gravis. The best surgical approach is still subject to debate. Minimally invasive surgery may have a lower mortality and morbidity rate, improved cosmetic results, and equivalent efficacy at improving neurologic symptoms to open approaches. We compared the perioperative outcomes and cost between the two techniques. We queried Florida Inpatient Discharge Dataset for patients who underwent thymectomy and had a primary diagnosis of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes to carry out this retrospective cohort study. The dates ranged between January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2018. We compared outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive thymectomy versus those who had open thymectomy. An open approach was used in 108 patients, whereas a minimally invasive approach was used in 40 patients. Minimally invasive surgery group had a shorter length of stay (3.0 vs. 6.0 days, P<0.001) and had a non-significant lower total cost ($18.4K vs. $22.1K, P=0.186). After adjusting for age and Elixhauser score, length of stay for minimally invasive group was 32% (P=0.01) lower compared to the open surgery group. Patients who underwent minimally invasive thymectomy for Myasthenia gravis had a significantly shorter length of stay and a lower, although not significant, overall cost.

Long-term outcome of minimally invasive thymectomy versus open thymectomy for locally advanced cases.

Our goal was to compare the oncological outcomes and efficacy between minimally invasive thymectomy (MIT) and open thymectomy (OT) in patients with early or locally advanced thymoma using a multicentre study database. We retrospectively collected data from 1,239 patients who underwent thymectomy between January 2000 and December 2013, as recorded in the database of the Korean Association for Research on Thymus. We compared the postoperative outcomes of the MIT and OT groups using unmatched and propensity score (PS) matched data. We excised the thymoma using MIT and OT in 455 and 784 patients, respectively. We matched 378 patients with Masaoka-Koga stage I or II thymoma by their PS. The operative time, duration of hospital stay and complications were significantly shorter in the MIT group than in the OT group (all P < 0.005). In the PS matched data, the groups did not show significant differences in the 10-year survival rate (87.7% in OT vs 85.5% in MIT, stage II, mean follow-up duration: 12.9 years in OT vs 11.1 years in MIT), recurrence-free survival (94.0% in OT vs 86.4% in MIT) and R0 resection (97.35% in OT and MIT, P = 0.59). Compared with OT, MIT was associated with shorter operative times, shorter durations of hospital stay and fewer complications. Long-term survival, recurrence-free survival and complete resection were not significantly different between the OT and MIT groups. Our findings may help physicians track the progress of patients with early or locally advanced thymomas and design treatment plans for them.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive thymectomy for myasthenia gravis with thymoma.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive thymectomy for myasthenia gravis with thymoma.

A national analysis of open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for stage I-III thymic carcinoma.

The oncological efficacy of minimally invasive thymectomy for thymic carcinoma is not well characterized. We compared overall survival and short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive surgical (video-assisted thoracoscopic and robotic) approaches using the National Cancer Database. Perioperative outcomes and overall survival of patients who underwent open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for Masaoka stage I-III thymic carcinoma from 2010 to 2015 in the National Cancer Database were evaluated using propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modelling. Outcomes by surgical approach were assessed using an intent-to-treat analysis. Of the 216 thymectomies that were evaluated, 43 (20%) were performed with minimally invasive techniques (22 video-assisted thoracoscopic and 21 robotic). The minimally invasive approach was associated with a shorter median length of stay when compared to the open approach (3 vs 5 days, P < 0.001). In the propensity score-matched analysis of 30 open and 30 minimally invasive thymectomies, the minimally invasive group did not differ significantly in median length of stay (3 vs 4.5 days, P = 0.27), 30-day readmission (P = 0.13), 30-day mortality (P = 0.60), 90-day mortality (P = 0.60), margin positivity (P = 0.39) and 5-year survival (78.6% vs 54.6%, P = 0.15) when compared to the open group. In this national analysis, minimally invasive thymectomy for stage I-III thymic carcinoma was found to have no significant differences in short-term outcomes and overall survival when compared to open thymectomy.

Post-Operative Outcomes Associated With Open Versus Robotic Thymectomy: A Propensity Matched Analysis

To compare post-operative outcomes associated with thymectomy performed using either open or robotic approaches. Retrospective cohort study from a single-center prospective registry consisting of patients undergoing thymectomy between 2000 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach (open vs robotic). A propensity-score matching analysis was performed in a 2:1 open to robotic ratio, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. We analyzed 234 thymectomies (155 open; 79 robotic). Myasthenia gravis was present in 23.2% and 32.9% (P=0.249) in the open and in the robotic group, respectively. All covariates were balanced in the matched groups (open n=114; robotic n =5 9), except lesion size. The robotic approach was significantly associated with shorter surgical time (median 95 vs 65 minutes, P < 0.001), lesser clinical (21.1% vs 6.8%, P=0.016) and surgical (11.4% vs 1.7%, P=0.036) complications during the same hospitalization, less Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher complication rates (28.1 vs 15.3%, P=0.048), chest tube duration (median: 3 vs 0 days, P < 0.001) and in-hospital length of stay (median: 5 vs 0 days, P < 0.001). Bleeding (P=0.214), ICU length of stay (P=0.167), reoperation rate (open, 1.8% vs robotic 0%), 90-day mortality (P=0.341) and readmission rate post discharge (P=0.277) were similar between the groups. In the matched population with primary thymic epithelial tumors, the completeness of resection rate was similar (open, 92.1% vs robotic 96.8%, P=0.66.). Robotic thymectomy is associated with improved post-operative outcomes when compared to open thymectomy, without compromising the goals of oncologic surgery. Longer follow-up is needed to ensure oncologic equivalence.

Minimally invasive surgery in the management of resectable thymoma: a retrospective analysis from the National Cancer Database.

BackgroundThymomas are relatively uncommon tumors traditionally resected via open sternotomy. Despite the appeal of minimally invasive techniques, concerns persist regarding their oncologic efficacy. We hypothesized that minimally-invasive thymectomies for resectable thymomas are oncologically safe when compared to open thymectomy.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with thymoma undergoing resection as the first mode of treatment between 2010–2015. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and perioperative outcomes were examined for each approach (robotic, thoracoscopic, or open). The primary endpoints were rates of complete (R0) resection and need for adjuvant radiotherapy. Chi-square and Student’s t-test and logistic regression were used for analysis.ResultsA total of 2,312 patients were identified. The utilization of myocardial infarction (MI) surgery increased during the study period (robotic: 7.6% to 19.5%; thoracoscopic: 9.3% to 18.4%, both P<0.0001). Median tumor size was higher and mediastinal invasion was more common in open thymectomies. R0 resection was more common in robotic and adjuvant radiotherapy was less frequent in thoracoscopic thymectomies. In multivariate analysis absence of mediastinal invasion (P<0.0001) was the only prognostic factor for R0 resection. Positive margins, mediastinal invasion (both P<0.0001) and younger age (P<0.01) were the only predictors of the need for adjuvant radiotherapy.ConclusionsUtilization of MI approaches for resectable thymoma has increased from 2010 to 2015. After adjusting for tumor size and mediastinal invasion, minimally-invasive thymectomy was not associated with lower R0 resection rates or increased use of adjuvant radiotherapy. MI thymectomy for resectable thymoma is oncologically equivalent to open thymectomy.

An Audit of the Outcomes of Thymic Surgery.

Most pathology of the thymus gland warrant its surgical removal; and this requires significant expertise and adequate medical set-up. This study aimed to audit the results of thymectomies performed in a specialised tertiary level centre in a resource-poor country. The outcomes of open and minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) thymectomies were also compared. Out of 58 patients operated at Department of Thoracic Surgery, Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal between October 2012 and January 2019, 33 patients underwent open thymectomy and 25 had VATS thymectomy. We conducted a retrospective search to look at operative time, blood loss and length of postoperative hospitalisation. The open surgery group was followed for an average of 32 months, and the VATS cohort for 38 months. No significant differences were found in mean operative times and overall survival between groups. In selected cases, thymectomy via VATS is safer and comparable to open thymectomy in terms of operative safety and oncological completeness. Key Words: Thymus, VATS, Thymectomy, Outcome.

National Use and Short-term Outcomes of Video and Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomies

BackgroundTranssternal open thymectomy has long been the most widely used approach for thymectomy, but recent decades have seen the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) thymectomy. This retrospective cohort study provides a national comparison of trends, outcomes, and resource utilization of open, VATS, and RATS thymectomy. MethodsAdmissions for thymectomies from 2008 to 2014 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were identified as undergoing open, VATS, or RATS thymectomy. Propensity score-matched analyses were used to compare overall complication rates, length of stay (LOS), and cost of VATS and RATS thymectomies. ResultsAn estimated 23,087 patients underwent thymectomy during the study period: open in 16,025 (69%) and MIS in 7217 (31%). Of the MIS cohort, 4119 (18%) underwent VATS and 3097 (13%) underwent RATS. Performance of RATS and VATS thymectomy increased while that of open thymectomy declined. Baseline characteristics between VATS and RATS were similar, except more women underwent VATS thymectomy. No differences in LOS or overall complication rates were appreciable in this study. VATS was associated with the lowest cost of the 3 approaches. ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate the increasing adoption of MIS and declining use of the open surgical approach for thymectomy. There are no differences in overall complication rates between RATS and VATS thymectomy, but RATS is associated with greater cost and lower cardiac complication rates.

Long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic thymectomy for thymoma stage i-ii

To compare long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and conventional open surgery in patients with early-stage (Masaoka stage I-II) thymic malignancies. Retrospective study included patients after VATS and open thymectomy for the period 2000-2019. Long-term outcomes were analyzed. VATS thymectomy was performed in 53 (54.1%) patients, open thymectomy - in 45 (45.9%) cases. Median follow-up period was 66.9 months. Overall 5-year survival was 89.8% and 97% in the Open and VATS groups, respectively (p=0.076). Disease-free survival rates were 79.6% and 86.6% (p=0.279), respectively. There was no significant difference in cumulative incidence of recurrence (13.3% vs 7.5%, p=0.505). Age <50 years and tumor size >5 cm were the independent risk factors of recurrence. VATS thymectomy is an effective approach ensuring similar long-term outcomes in patients with early stages of thymic malignancies.

Comparative analysis of thoracoscopic and open thymectomy for thymoma stage I-II

To improve the short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with thymoma stage I-II by using of thoracoscopic thymectomy (VATS TE) and to compare this technique with open (OTE) thymectomy. A retrospective analysis included 98 patients who had undergone surgery for thymoma stage I and II for the period from January 2001 to December 2019. VATS TE (main group) was performed in 53 (54.1%) cases, OTE (control group) - in 45 (45.9%) patients. Duration of VATS TE and OTE was similar. VATS procedure was characterized by less intraoperative blood loss (50 vs 225 ml, p=0.000), lower pain scores and morphine consumption (p=0.000), shorter postoperative pleural drainage (1.5 vs 3.8 days, p=0.000), and postoperative hospital-stay (7.6 vs 12.7 days, p=0.000). Incidence of major complications was significantly less in the main group (9.4% vs. 1.9%, p=0.001). VATS TE is effective and safe procedure for thymoma stage I-II. Postoperative period after VATS TE is characterized by less intraoperative blood loss, incidence of complications, duration of pleural drainage and hospital-stay.

Surgical and Neurological Outcome of Minimally Invasive Thymectomy in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis: An Experience of 100 Cases Over 6 Years at a Tertiary Care Center in North India.

Minimally invasive thymectomy (MIT) is emerging as an effective alternative to open thymectomy in the management of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). The primary objective of our study is to assess the surgical and neurological outcome of MIT in patients with MG. It is a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of 100 patients with MG, who underwent MIT from April 2012 to January 2018 at a tertiary care center in India. Surgical outcome was assessed for success of minimal invasive approach, conversion, perioperative morbidity, and postoperative hospital course. Neurological outcome was assessed, after at least 1 year of follow-up, according to Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status. Factors predicting complete stable remission (CSR) were evaluated. MIT was successfully performed in 98% patients with 2% conversion. There was no mortality. Overall, 10% of patients had perioperative morbidity with 5% having exacerbation of neurological symptoms. Two of these needed postoperative ventilation, whereas 3 recovered on conservative treatment. Median operative time and hospital stay were 140 minutes and 3 days, respectively. At a median follow-up of 47 months, CSR was seen in 20% with improvement in 73.3%. Overall, 63% patients were taken off steroids and patients requiring 3 drugs decreased by 70.7%. There was significant reduction in the dosage of pyridostigmine (P<0.001), prednisolone (P<0.001), and azathioprine (P=0.002) after thymectomy. Milder disease (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class 1 and 2) predicted CSR on multivariate analysis. MIT is a safe and effective procedure that leads to improvement in neurological status with significant reduction in number and dosage of medications after thymectomy. Mild disease predicts CSR.

A national analysis of open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for stage I to III thymoma

ObjectiveThe oncologic efficacy of minimally invasive thymectomy for thymoma is not well characterized. We compared short-term outcomes and overall survival between open and minimally invasive (video-assisted thoracoscopic and robotic) approaches using the National Cancer Data Base. MethodsPerioperative outcomes and survival of patients who underwent open versus minimally invasive thymectomy for clinical stage I to III thymoma from 2010 to 2014 in the National Cancer Data Base were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score–matched analysis. Predictors of minimally invasive use were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes of surgical approach were evaluated using an intent-to-treat analysis. ResultsOf the 1223 thymectomies that were evaluated, 317 (26%) were performed minimally invasively (141 video-assisted thoracoscopic and 176 robotic). The minimally invasive group had a shorter median length of stay when compared with the open group (3 [2-4] days vs 4 [3-6] days, P < .001). In a propensity score–matched analysis of 185 open and 185 minimally invasive (video-assisted thoracoscopic + robotic) thymectomy, the minimally invasive group continued to have a shorter median length of stay (3 vs 4 days, P < .01) but did not have significant differences in margin positivity (P = .84), 30-day readmission (P = .28), 30-day mortality (P = .60), and 5-year survival (89.4% vs 81.6%, P = .20) when compared with the open group. ConclusionsIn this national analysis, minimally invasive thymectomy was associated with shorter length of stay and was not associated with increased margin positivity, perioperative mortality, 30-day readmission rate, or reduced overall survival when compared with open thymectomy.

Commentary: Minimally invasive versus open thymectomy for stage I to III thymoma—Big incision, small difference?

Commentary: Minimally invasive versus open thymectomy for stage I to III thymoma—Big incision, small difference?

Comparison of Thoracoscopic Versus Open Thymectomy in Treatment of Large Thymoma During Perioperative Period

Comparison of Thoracoscopic Versus Open Thymectomy in Treatment of Large Thymoma During Perioperative Period

Long-term oncological outcome in thymic malignancies: videothoracoscopic versus open thymectomy

Complete resection is the standard of care for thymic malignancies. There is still a debate about the optimal surgical approach for thymic tumors, particularly regarding long-term oncological outcome. This study aimed to compare videothoracoscopic surgery (VTS) with open surgery for thymic malignancies, regarding perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. A prospective study ran from 2010 to 2019. Patients with thymoma or thymic carcinoma underwent complete thymectomy via VTS or open surgery and were followed up. The long-term oncological outcome was disease recurrence. There were 29 patients in the VTS group and 35 patients in the open group with an average follow-up period of 80 months. The VTS approach significantly shortened operative duration (89.7 versus 116.9 min), caused less blood loss (56.9 versus 176.3 ml), reduced pain score (4.8 versus 6.7), and shortened chest drainage duration (2.1 versus 3.1 days) as well as hospital stay (5.1 versus 7.7 days). The two groups were comparable in long-term oncological outcome (two recurrences in the VTS group and one in the open group). Compared to open surgery, VTS leads to superior perioperative outcomes and a comparable long-term oncological outcome. The authors advocate the VTS approach as a routine option for the surgery of thymic malignancies. Videothoracoscopic surgery is less traumatic and has faster recovery times than open surgery, with a comparable long-term oncological outcome.