Open Surgical Revascularization Research Articles

Real-world application of Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection scores in peripheral arterial disease patients

ObjectiveThe Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system aims to risk stratify patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), predicting both amputation rates and the need for revascularization. However, real-world use of the system and whether it predicts outcomes accurately after open revascularization and peripheral interventions is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine the adoption of the WIfI classification system within a contemporary statewide collaborative as well as the impact of patient factor, and WIfI risk assessment on short- and long-term outcomes. MethodsUsing data from a large statewide collaborative, we identified patients with CLTI undergoing open surgical revascularization or peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) between 2016 and 2022. The primary exposure was preoperative clinical WIfI stage. Patients were categorized according to the SVS Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System into clinical WIfI stages 1, 2, 3, or 4. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year amputation and mortality rates. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of WIfI stage on postrevascularization outcomes. ResultsIn the cohort of 17,417 patients, 83.4% (n = 14,529) had WIfI stage documented. PVIs were performed on 57.6% of patients, and 42.4% underwent an open surgical revascularization. Of the patients, 49.5% were classified as stage 1, 19.3% stage 2, 12.8% stage 3, and 18.3% of patients met stage 4 criteria. Stage 3 and 4 patients had higher rates of diabetes, congestive heart failure, and renal failure, and were less likely to be current or former smokers. One-half of stage 3 patients underwent open surgical revascularization, whereas stage 1 patients were most likely to have received a PVI (64%). As WIfI stage increased from 1 to 4, 1-year mortality increased from 12% to 21% (P < .001), 30-day amputation rates increased from 5% to 38% (P < .001), and 1-year amputation rates increased from 15% to 55% (P < .001). Finally, patients who did not have WIfI scores classified had significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, as well as higher 30-day and 1-year amputation rates. ConclusionsThe SVS WIfI clinical stage is significantly associated with 1-year amputation rates in patients with CLTI after lower extremity revascularization. Because nearly 55% of stage 4 patients require a major amputation within 1 year of intervention, this finding study supports use of the WIfI classification system in clinical decision-making for patients with CLTI.

The prevalent causes of death in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing revascularisation or amputation.

Preventing untimely death in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requires a detailed understanding of the predominant causes of death (COD). This literature review aims to describe how short- and long-term COD are reported in patients who had surgery for PAD. A literature review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for articles reporting specific causes of mortality in patients who had surgery for all stages of PAD. Articles were included if they reported COD after open surgical or endovascular revascularisation, or major or minor amputation for PAD. Critical appraisals were conducted according to included study types, using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Cause of death was reported in 21 publications. Twenty were observational and one was a randomised control trial. Study size ranged from 25 to 10,505 patients. Cardiovascular disease was the most prevalent COD in perioperative periods (42.5% from 13 studies). Long-term follow-up ranged from 1month and 7years with 15 studies reporting cardiac related mortality as the most frequent cause of death. However, mortality from neoplasia, respiratory disease (including pneumonia and pulmonary emboli), stroke and sepsis were prevalent. Many studies were low-average quality, with few population-based observational studies. Whilst cardiovascular COD are the most prevalent reasons for mortality in patients with PAD, the proportion of patients dying from neoplasia and respiratory disease is high. Improved reporting standards for COD in studies examining PAD are needed.

Indications and technique of open vascular surgical revascularization of visceral arteries in mesenteric ischemia

Open revascularization for mesenteric ischemia has retained asignificant value despite the increasing importance and use of endovascular techniques. Surgical procedures such as retrograde embolectomy, thromboendarterectomy and visceral bypass are indispensable components of the therapeutic armamentarium, particularly in cases of multisegmental vascular involvement, failure of previous endovascular treatment and concomitant presence of peritonitis, shock or multiorgan failure. In this context, preoperative multiphase computed tomography (CT) angiography is essential for the planning and outcome of visceral revascularization. This article summarizes the indications, technique, and results of the most important open surgical procedures.

Lower Extremity Amputation and Peripheral Revascularisation Rates in Romania and Their Relationship with Comorbidities and Vascular Care.

(1) Background: This retrospective Romanian study aimed to calculate the rate of, and comparison between, amputation and revascularisation for patients with either cardiovascular or diabetic comorbidities. (2) Materials: In our hospital-based database, we analysed patient-level data from a series of 61 hospitals for 2019, which covers 44.9% of the amputation patients for that year. The national database is compiled by the national houses of insurance and was used to follow amputations and revascularisations between 2016 and 2021. (3) Results: During the six-year period, the mean number of amputations and revascularisations was 72.4 per 100,000 inhabitants per year for both groups. In this period, a decline in open-surgical revascularisation was observed from 58.3% to 47.5% in all interventions but was not statistically significant (r = -0.20, p = 0.70). The mean age of patients with amputation (hospital-based database) was 67 years. Of these patients, only 5.1% underwent revascularisation in the same hospital prior to amputation. The most common comorbidities in those undergoing amputations were peripheral arterial disease (76.8%), diabetes (60.8%), and arterial hypertension (53.5%). Most amputations were undertaken by general surgeons (73.0%) and only a small number of patients were treated by vascular surgeons (17.4%). (4) Conclusions: The signal from our data indicates that Romanian patients probably have a high risk of amputation > 5 years earlier than Western European countries, such as Denmark, Finland, and Germany. The prevalence of revascularisations in Romania is 64% lower than in the Western European countries.

Outcomes After Open Surgical, Hybrid, and Endovascular Revascularization for Acute Limb Ischemia.

To report the performance of surgical treatment (ST), hybrid treatment (HT), and endovascular treatment (ET) for patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI). This is a retrospective, comparative study of all consecutive patients with ALI treated in 2 tertiary centers between April 2010 and April 2020. Amputation and/or death (amputation-free survival; AFS) was the primary composite endpoint. Mortality, major amputation, and reintervention during follow-up were additionally analyzed. Proportional hazards modeling was used to identify confounders, results are presented as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In total, 395 patients (mean age=71.1±13.6 years; 51.1% female) were treated during the study period. Surgical treatment was preferred in 150 patients (38%), while 98 were treated by HT (24.8%) and 147 by ET (37.2%). Rutherford class IIa was the most common clinical presentation in the ET group (50.3%), whereas Rutherford IIb was most common in the ST (54%) and HT (48%) groups (p<0.001). Significantly, more patients presented with a de novo lesion in the ST and HT groups (79.3% and 64.3%, respectively) compared with ET (53.7%; p<0.001). Median follow-up was 20 months (range=0-111 months). In the multivariate analysis, ET showed significantly better AFS during follow-up compared with ST (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.2-2.9, p<0.001) and HT (HR=1.73, 95% CI=1.1-3.1, p<0.001). Mortality during follow-up was also significantly lower after ET compared with ST (HR=2.21, 95% CI=1.31-3.74, p=0.003) and HT (HR=2.04, 95% CI=1.17-3.56, p=0.012). Endovascular treatment was associated with lower amputation rate compared with ST (HR=2.27, 95% CI=1.19-4.35, p=0.013) but was comparable with HT (HR=2.00, 95% CI=0.98-4.06, p=0.055). Reintervention rates did not differ significantly between the groups (ET vs ST: HR=1.52, 95% CI=0.99-2.31, p=0.053; ET vs HT: HR=1.3, 95% CI=0.81-2.07, p=0.27). Endovascular treatment for ALI was associated with improved AFS and comparable reintervention rates compared with open surgical and hybrid therapy. Treatment of acute lower limb ischemia remains a challenge for clinicians with high morbidity and mortality rates. Endovascular revascularization is considered first line treatment for many and hybrid treatments are becoming more common, however data is limited to either old trials, small series or with short follow-up. We present herein our 10-year experience with all available devices and techniques for open surgical, endovascular and hybrid acute limb ischemia treatments and compare their outcomes.

Abstract 15754: The Incidence and Effect of Cardiac Function Decline After Lower Extremity Revascularization

Introduction: The impact of cardiac function decline on major adverse limb events (MALE) following lower extremity revascularization (LER) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has not been described. Methods: The electronic records of patients undergoing LER for PAD in a single center were reviewed. Two transthoracic echocardiograms were captured, the first within 6 months of LER and the second on later follow-up. Patients were then divided into 2 groups: cardiac function decline (decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) by ≥10%) or stable cardiac function (reduction in EF&lt;10% or improved EF). Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared, including MALE. Results: Of the 922 patients who underwent LER, 221 (24.0%) experienced a cardiac function decline. Out of the 701 patients with stable cardiac function, 599 (65.0%) had a &lt;10% reduction in EF, and 102 (11.0%) had an EF improvement. Patients with cardiac function decline were more likely to have diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Furthermore, patients with cardiac function decline were more likely to undergo open surgical revascularization. Patients with cardiac function decline demonstrated higher rates of periprocedural bleeding after initial LER. After a 3-year follow-up, patients with cardiac function decline had higher mortality and lower overall frequency of reinterventions. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in freedom from MALE between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Patients with cardiac function decline after LER for PAD have increased mortality but no significant difference in limb outcomes compared to patients with stable cardiac function.

Endovascular revascularization of challenging anatomical lesions: Revascularization in TASC-II C and D classes: A single-centre retrospective report

Aim: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts quality of life and that can lead to limb amputation and thromboembolic events. Treatment options for PAD include endovascular and open surgical interventions, with the choice depending on the Trans-Atlantic inter-society consensus II (TASC II) classification. Recent evidence suggests that endovascular therapy may be feasible for complex PAD lesions, but further research is needed. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 50 patients with TASC II class C and D lesions. The procedures were conducted using a state-of-the-art angiography system, and patients received appropriate antiplatelet therapy and heparin during the intervention. Data collection was performed following ethical considerations and standardization protocols. Results: This study involved 50 patients with peripheral arterial disease, characterized by an average age of 65.0 years and a prevalence of comorbidities such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and tobacco use. The majority of patients presented with claudication and had lesions primarily in the femoropopliteal region. The procedures performed, primarily using drug-coated balloons, resulted in high technical success rates and favorable outcomes at 30 days, with a slight decline in primary patency rates at 6 months. Some patients required readmission due to cardiac reasons, and a small portion necessitated open surgical revascularization. Conclusion: Our findings support the use of endovascular revascularization as a safe and effective option for patients with complex lesions. Further research is needed to address challenges related to dissection and optimize outcomes in this patient population. This study contributes to the growing understanding of treatment approaches for peripheral artery disease and highlights the potential benefits of endovascular therapy.

Outcomes of open revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia at a tertiary care center in India.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a rare, debilitating disease associated with higher morbidity and mortality if not treated on time. In the past two decades, there has been a paradigm shift in its management with endovascular modality due to reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality. In the endovascular era, only a few patients require surgical therapy. We conducted this study to report our experience with open surgical revascularization at our hospital. We have conducted a retrospective study after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethics Committee. Data regarding patients who underwent open revascularization for CMI with long-segment occlusion from 2016 to 2021 has been retrieved from the institutional database. The demographic data, clinical presentation, type of surgery and graft used, perioperative mortality and morbidity and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Twenty-one patients underwent open surgical revascularization; 16 were males and five females. The median age was 43years. Fourteen (66.7%) were smokers. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.4 ± 13.6months. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0% and morbidity was 28%. The average duration of hospital stay and postoperative weight gain were 6.9 ± 3.7days and 11 ± 4.9 kgs, respectively. One patient died at two years of follow-up due to myocardial infarction and one had a recurrence. Long-term survival at 60months of follow-up was 91.6% and the primary-patency rate was 95.2%. Owing to better long-term and reintervention-free patency, open revascularization should be considered in patients who are fit for surgery, particularly in patients with long-segment mesenteric artery occlusion.

Endovascular therapy for peripheral arterial disease

In addition to conservative therapy with intensive walking training, endovascular revascularisation and open vascular surgical revascularisation are of high importance in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Over the past decades, endovascular therapy has developed considerably and is now the treatment of choice for most vascular segments. The use of different devices has been shown to be beneficial for different vessel segments. Primary stent angioplasty has been shown to be superior to balloon angioplasty with secondary stent implantation for the treatment of iliac lesions. Femoropopliteal, the use of paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty is recommended. A mortality signal shown in a meta-analysis was not confirmed. With directional atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy, different options for plaque modification are available. The cytostatic drug sirolimus as another antirestenotic substance still has to be investigated in large, randomised trials. A final assessment of the effectiveness and safety is not yet possible. Infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty remains the standard treatment. After interventional therapy, regular follow-up is recommended.

Conservative therapy and secondary prevention of PAD

Today, peripheral artery disease (PAD) is treated with the most modern endovascular and open surgical revascularisation procedures. But the short and long-term success of these interventions is decisively determined by the conservative therapy of PAD, which therefore represents the absolute basic therapy of every PAD. Conservative treatment addresses the "Big Five" of atherosclerosis risk factors: smoking, lack of exercise and overweight, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Despite the knowledge that PAD as a peripheral manifestation of the systemic atherosclerosis needs the same risk factor management as e.g., coronary heart disease, not even every second PAD patient in Germany receives the required therapy. This paper presents the spectrum of both drug and non-drug strategies and focuses on aspects such as platelet inhibition and anticoagulation regimes, lipid-lowering options as well as the benefits and necessity of exercise programs to promote collaterals and improve quality of life by extending the pain-free walking distance. Proven strategies to overcome smoking addiction, use and purpose of vasoactive substances are highlighted as well as the potential risks of diabetic foot syndrome for limb salvage and prevention of wounds.

Limb Related Outcomes of Endovascular vs. Open Surgical Revascularisation in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: A Report from the Prospective GermanVasc Cohort Study

Limb Related Outcomes of Endovascular vs. Open Surgical Revascularisation in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: A Report from the Prospective GermanVasc Cohort Study

Medial arterial calcification score is associated with increased risk of major limb amputation

ObjectiveThe pedal medial arterial calcification (MAC) score has been associated with risk of major limb amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. This study aimed to validate the pedal MAC scoring system in a multi-institutional analysis to validate its usefulness in limb amputation risk prediction. MethodsA multi-institution, retrospective study of patients who underwent endovascular or open surgical infrainguinal revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia was performed. MAC scores of 0 to 5 were assigned based on visible calcified arteries on foot X ray then trichotomized (0-1, 2-4, 5) for analysis. The primary outcome was major limb amputation at 6 months. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier models were used to analyze time-to-major amputation across groups. ResultsThere were 176 patients with 184 affected limbs (mean age, 66 years; 61% male; 60% White), of whom 97% presented with a wound. The MAC score was 0 in 41%, 1 in 9%, 2 in 13%, 3 in 11%, 4 in 13%, and 5 in 13% of the limbs. There were 26 major amputations (14%) and 16 deaths (8.7%) within 6 months. Patients with MAC 5 had a significantly higher risk of major limb amputation than both the 0 to 1 and 2 to 4 groups (P = .001 and P = .044, respectively), and lower overall amputation-free survival (log-rank P = .008). ConclusionsPedal MAC score is a reproducible and generalizable measure of inframalleolar arterial disease that can be used with Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection staging to predict major limb amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Endovascular revascularization vs. open surgical revascularization for patients with lower extremity artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Currently, the main treatment for lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is revascularization, including endovascular revascularization (EVR) and open surgical revascularization (OSR), but the specific revascularization strategy for LEAD is controversial. This review provided the comprehensive and recent evidence for the treatment of LEAD. Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the short-term or long-term outcomes between EVR and OSR of LEAD were identified. Short-term outcomes were 30-day mortality, major amputation, wound complication, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and length of hospital stay (LOS), while long-term outcomes included overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS), freedom from re-intervention (FFR), primary patency (PP), and secondary patency (SP). 11 RCTs and 105 cohorts involving 750,134 patients were included in this analysis. For the pooled results of cohort studies, EVR markedly decreased the risk of 30-day mortality, wound complication, MACEs, LOS, but increased the risk of OS, FFR, PP, and SP. For the pooled outcomes of RCTs, EVR was associated with obviously lower 30-day mortality, less wound complication and shorter LOS, but higher risk of PP, and SP. However, both RCTs and cohorts did not show obvious difference in 30-day major amputation and AFS. Both the pooled results of cohorts and RCTs indicated that EVR was associated with a lower short-term risk for LEAD, while OSR was accompanied by a substantially lower long-term risk. Therefore, the life expectancy of LEAD should be strictly considered when choosing the revascularization modality. As the current findings mainly based on data of retrospective cohort studies, additional high-quality studies are essential to substantiate these results. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42022317239.

Contextualizing the BEST-CLI Trial Results in Clinical Practice.

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with poor long-term outcomes. Although prompt revascularization is recommended, the optimal revascularization strategy remains uncertain. The BEST-CLI trial compared endovascular and open surgical revascularization for CLTI, but the generalizability of this study to the clinical population with CLTI has not been evaluated. We included Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-85 years with CLTI who underwent revascularization and would be eligible for enrollment in BEST-CLI between 2016 and 2019. The primary exposure was type of revascularization (endovascular vs autologous graft [cohort 1] vs nonautologous graft [cohort 2]), and the primary outcome was a composite of major adverse limb events (MALE) and death. MALE included above-ankle amputation and major intervention, which was defined as new bypass of index limb, thrombectomy, or thrombolysis. A total of 66,153 patients were included in this study (10,125 autologous grafts; 7867 nonautologous grafts; 48,161 endovascular). Compared with those enrolled in BEST-CLI cohort 1, patients in this study were older (mean age, 73.5 ± 5.7 vs 69.9 ± 9.9 years), more likely to be female (38.3% [22,340/58,286] vs 28.5% [408/1434]), and presented with more comorbidities. Endovascular operators for the study population vs BEST-CLI cohort 1 were less likely to be surgeons (55.9% [26,924/48,148] vs 73.0% [520/708]) and more likely to be cardiologists (25.5% [5900/48,148] vs 14.5% [103/78]). When assessing long-term outcomes, the crude risk of death or MALE in this cohort was higher with surgery (56.6% autologous grafts vs 42.6% BEST-CLI cohort 1 at a median of follow-up 2.7 years; 51.6% nonautologous grafts vs 42.8% BEST-CLI cohort 2 at a median follow-up of 1.6 years) but similar with the endovascular cohort (58.7% Medicare vs 57.4% cohort 1 at 2.7 years; 47.0% Medicare vs 47.7% cohort 2 at 1.6 years). Of those who received endovascular treatment, the risk of incident major intervention was less than half in this cohort compared with the trial cohort (10.0% Medicare vs 23.5% cohort 1 at 2.7 years; 8.6% Medicare vs 25.6% cohort 2 at 1.6 years), although technical endovascular failures were not captured. These results suggest that the findings of the BEST-CLI trial may not be applicable to the entirety of the Medicare population of patients with CLTI undergoing revascularization.

The Impact of Pre-Operative Anaemia on One Year Amputation Free Survival and Re-Admissions in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery for Peripheral Arterial Disease: a National Vascular Registry Study

Anaemia is common among patients undergoing surgery, but its association with post-operative outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is unclear. The aim of this observational population based study was to examine the association between pre-operative anaemia and one year outcomes after surgical revascularisation for PAD. This study used data from the National Vascular Registry, linked with an administrative database (Hospital Episode Statistics), to identify patients who underwent open surgical lower limb revascularisation for PAD in English NHS hospitals between January 2016 and December 2019. The primary outcome was one year amputation free survival. Secondary outcomes were one year re-admission rate, 30 day re-intervention rate, 30 day ipsilateral major amputation rate and 30 day death. Flexible parametric survival analysis and generalised linear regression were performed to assess the effect of anaemia on one year outcomes. The analysis included 13 641 patients, 57.9% of whom had no anaemia, 23.8% mild, and 18.3% moderate or severe anaemia. At one year follow up, 80.6% of patients were alive and amputation free. The risk of one year amputation or death was elevated in patients with mild anaemia (adjusted HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.15 - 1.41) and moderate or severe anaemia (aHR 1.5; 1.33 - 1.67). Patients with moderate or severe anaemia experienced more re-admissions over one year (adjusted IRR 1.31; 1.26 - 1.37) and had higher odds of 30 day re-interventions (aOR 1.22; 1.04 - 1.45), 30 day ipsilateral major amputation (aOR 1.53; 1.17 - 2.01), and 30 day death (aOR 1.39; 1.03 - 1.88) compared with patients with no anaemia. Pre-operative anaemia is associated with lower one year amputation free survival and higher one year re-admission rates following surgical revascularisation in patients with PAD. Research is required to evaluate whether interventions to correct anaemia improve outcomes after lower limb revascularisation.

The Relationship Between Hospital Procedure Volume and Outcomes After Endovascular or Open Surgical Revascularisation for Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data

The Relationship Between Hospital Procedure Volume and Outcomes After Endovascular or Open Surgical Revascularisation for Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data

Clinical Analysis of Microvascular Reconstruction Combined With Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients With Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarctions

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microvascular reconstruction combined with decompressive craniectomy in patients with MMCA. We searched for patients with MMCA ,and age＜60 years old, postoperative survival of more than 3 months, consistent with decompression of bone flap removal. Patients were divided into experimental group and control group according to whether they underwent emergency vascular revascularization within 5 days after onset of ischemic stroke. A total of 6 patients were included in the treatment group and 12 patients in the control group. The NIHSS score of the treatment group was lower than that of the control group 7 days after operation, but the difference was not statistically significant;3 months after surgery, mRs score in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.002); mRs scores of the treatment group 3 months after surgery were significantly different from those before surgery (P<0.05), but no such difference was found in the control group. Compared with DHC, open surgical revascularization can improve early cerebral perfusion in MMCA patients, and neurological recovery is better at 3 months after operation. By ensuring that surgeons are properly trained and hospitals are equipped, open surgical revascularization can be a treatment option for patients with MMCA.

Limb Related Outcomes of Endovascular vs. Open Surgical Revascularisation in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: A Report from the Prospective GermanVasc Cohort Study

The goal of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease undergoing revascularisation by peripheral endovascular intervention (EVI), bypass surgery, endarterectomy (EA), and hybrid surgery in an unselected real world setting. This was a German, prospective, multicentre, comparative cohort study, enrolling patients at hospital admission for revascularisation at 35 vascular centres with 12 months of follow up. Primary composite endpoints were major amputation or death, major adverse limb events, and any minor or major amputation. Twelve month incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) for the four subgroups and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier functions and Cox proportional hazard models. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, pharmacological treatment, and comorbidities were used to adjust for patient differentials (unique identifier ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03098290. In total, 4 475 patients were analysed (mean age 69 years, 69.1% males, and 31.5% suffering from chronic limb threatening ischaemia). After 12 months of follow up, 5.3% (95% CI 3.6 - 6.9%) of the patients experienced either death or major amputation, 7.2% (95% CI 4.8 - 9.6%) major adverse limb event, and 6.6% (95% CI 5.0 - 8.2%) any minor or major amputation. Compared with EVI, bypass surgery was associated with an increased risk of amputation or death (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.75 - 3.85), major adverse limb event (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.11 - 3.36), and any minor or major amputation (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.42 - 3.16), and hybrid surgery with an increased risk of amputation or death (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.27 - 4.13) and major adverse limb event (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.03 - 2.54). After adjusting for patient differentials, no significant differences among study groups remained. More favourable outcomes after EVI were completely attributed to differentials in patient characteristics and not procedure type. The current study emphasised that all competing approaches performed similarly in a real world setting.

Akute Extremitätenischämie – was gibt es Neues?

Acute limb ischemia is a vascular emergency and current guidelines emphasize the need for rapid treatment in a vascular center with an option of open surgical and interventional revascularization. Endovascular revascularization options for acute limb ischemia are increasingly focused on a wide range of mechanical thrombectomy devices based on different operating principles.For patients with acute limb ischemia in the setting of covid-19 infection high mortality rates and low technical success rates of revascularization procedures have been described.

Predictors of poor outcomes after lower extremity revascularization for acute limb ischemia.

Acute lower extremity ischemia is one of the most common emergencies in vascular surgery and is a cause of considerable morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia and to determine factors associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality. A total of 354 patients underwent urgent revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia at an academic medical center between 2014 and 2019. A retrospective review of patients' demographics, comorbidities, etiology and severity of limb ischemia, and procedural characteristics was recorded. Outcomes, including postoperative complications, perioperative limb loss, and mortality, were analyzed. The mean patient age was 69 ± 17years, and 52% were females. 50% of patients presented with Rutherford Class IIb ischemia. Arterial embolization was the most common cause of limb ischemia, seen in 33% of cases. Open surgical revascularization was performed in 241 (68%) patients, while endovascular and hybrid approaches were utilized in 53 (15%) and 60 (17%) cases, respectively. Postoperative adverse events occurred in 44% of patients, including wound complications (11%), cardiac (5%) and pulmonary (16%) complications, strokes (4%), UTIs (10%), renal failure (14%), bleeding (5%), and compartment syndrome (3%). The rate of unplanned return to the operating room was 21%. Major adverse cardiovascular events were seen in 103 (29%) patients and major adverse limb events were seen in 57 (16%) patients. The median length of stay was 10 days (IQR = 4); 49% patients were discharged to skilled nursing facility and 19% were readmitted within 30 days.The rate of amputation during index admission was 10%, and perioperative mortality was 20%. Gender, tibial runoff, and etiology of limb ischemia were independent predictors of limb loss. Women had lower risk of limb loss than men (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.023, 0.38). Poor tibial runoff (one-vessel or absence of flow below the knee) was a significant predictor of limb loss as compared to three-vessel runoff (OR, 14.92; 95% CI, 1.92, 115.88). Aneurysmal disease (OR, 38.35; 95% CI, 3.54, 42.45) and traumatic injuries (OR, 108.08; 95% CI, 8.21, 159.06) were the strongest predictors of amputation as compared to other etiologies of limb ischemia. Multivariate model identified ESRD (OR, 9.2; 95% CI, 1.8-46.3), degree of ischemia (class IIb or higher vs class IIa; OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-10.6), and age (OR, 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.0 for every 10years) as independent predictors of perioperative mortality. Urgent revascularization for management of acute limb ischemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Elderly patients with ESRD presenting with severely threatened limbs have especially high risk of perioperative mortality and may not be ideal candidates for limb salvage.