Open Retroperitoneal Approach Research Articles

Explant of an Embolized Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device

This case highlights an open retroperitoneal approach to explant an embolized left atrial appendage occlusion device in the visceral aorta. Endovascular retrieval of the device was deemed to be an inferior alternative given the significant mural thrombus that extended toward the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery from the device, as demonstrated on computed tomography angiogram, and the associated risk of embolizing the visceral vessels or the lower extremities. After explantation of the device and thrombectomy of the visceral aorta and vessels, the aorta was closed with a bovine pericardium patch and the patient had excellent flow in the visceral vessels on Doppler interrogation as well as palpable femoral and dorsalis pedis pulses bilaterally. eyJraWQiOiI4ZjUxYWNhY2IzYjhiNjNlNzFlYmIzYWFmYTU5NmZmYyIsImFsZyI6IlJTMjU2In0.eyJzdWIiOiJkNTNlYmZhY2E0ZmY1Mzg1MmY5NzhlNDZjMTBjZThmNyIsImtpZCI6IjhmNTFhY2FjYjNiOGI2M2U3MWViYjNhYWZhNTk2ZmZjIiwiZXhwIjoxNjg0ODU3NjI1fQ.EwSKLOWw5WMOIFl-wvWWwpZ7pG3kMhvd-frnMY9vMsKkaG5adl1pnISOCa7EIYfupXtCwyig2ODvko3HhNvDcJ7kZjuJmGR33n7CmhdTq26386TMs8CE2nUTr4nk1KR-ETkO2MaC35h3oI9NIwT0WL9wxp8HUREcuc5Abtp_sXo1wMPlZvcn3hBHioZ2LDS1R3ujoBhwpG3-O5ALBXldrThyDOO_Gy9dS1se8d-PqiqlTGKAyZpLQhSUKjel8oc81EsIYQ-QfOh1uS3bHWlSzAL3j_LyBHK7drmWFixT0-01ztpO6MLn4fyj01wGEFBW6QFHSsetgmPmwayf3HyrmQ Download .mp4 (107.46 MB) Help with .mp4 files Watchman Case 1.8.23NoTitles.mp4

Permanent Flank Bulge after Flank Incision: Patient- and Physician-Reported Outcome

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for postoperative flank bulging and associated physiologic/psychologic consequences as well as to establish a clinical flank bulge classification system after open retroperitoneal surgery. Methods: In this retrospective study, a postal patient survey was sent to 240 patients who underwent open retroperitoneal surgery between 2007 and 2017. Patients, who reported a flank bulge, were invited for further evaluation, which included a clinical examination and standardized photo documentation. Results: Forty-three of 120 patients (35.8%) reported a flank bulging after retroperitoneal surgery. During clinical examination, a flank bulge could be confirmed in 25 patients, whereas in 18 patients, no bulging could be detected, leading to a corrected rate of flank bulge-positive patients of 20.8%. The corresponding relaxation values ranged from 1 to 1.44 and correlated with the clinical degree of bulging. A body mass index of ≥25 was identified as a risk factor. No correlation was found regarding age, gender, surgery side, access to the retroperitoneum, surgical procedure, and pathology. Thirty-seven patients complained about chronic pain or suffered from the cosmetic impact of bulging. Thirteen of those patients had shown a flank bulge during clinical examination, resulting in a symptomatic bulge rate of 10.8% (13/120 patients). Conclusion: Chronic pain and postoperative flank bulging are 2 of the most common long-term complications after open retroperitoneal access. If an open retroperitoneal approach is required, particularly obese patients should be thoroughly informed about the risk of flank bulging and chronic pain.

Surgical Indications and Techniques for Adrenalectomy.

Indications for adrenalectomy are malignancy suspicion or malignant tumors, non-functional tumors with the risk of malignancy and functional adrenal tumors. Regardless of the size of functional tumors, they have surgical indications. The hormone-secreting adrenal tumors in which adrenalectomy is indicated are as follows: Cushing’s syndrome, arises from hypersecretion of glucocorticoids produced in fasciculata adrenal cortex, Conn’s syndrome, arises from an hypersecretion of aldosterone produced by glomerulosa adrenal cortex, and Pheochromocytomas that arise from adrenal medulla and produce catecholamines. Sometimes, bilateral adrenalectomy may be required in Cushing’s disease due to pituitary or ectopic ACTH secretion. Adenomas arise from the reticularis layer of the adrenal cortex, which rarely releases too much adrenal androgen and estrogen, may also develop and have an indication for adrenalectomy. Adrenal surgery can be performed by laparoscopic or open technique. Today, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard treatment in selected patients. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed transperitoneally or retroperitoneoscopically. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. In the selection of the surgery type, the experience and habits of the surgeon are also important, along with the patient’s characteristics. The most common type of surgery performed in the world is laparoscopic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy, which most surgeons are more familiar with. The laparoscopic anterior transperitoneal approach is the least preferred laparoscopic method in adrenalectomy. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed with a posterior or lateral approach. In addition to conventional laparoscopy, laparoscopic surgery is robot-assisted, which can be administered by transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. In addition, conventional or robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed transabdominally or retroperitoneally using the single-port method. Today, partial adrenalectomy can be performed using laparoscopic techniques in bilateral adrenal masses, hereditary diseases with the risk of developing multiple adrenal tumors, and solitary masses of the adrenal gland. Open surgery is indicated in the case of malignancy or suspected malignancy and large tumors when laparoscopic surgery is contraindicated. The risk of conversion to open surgery is low (approximately 5%). The open transperitoneal anterior approach is the most common open intervention, especially in large tumors with malignancy or suspected malignancy. This procedure can be performed using a midline incision, bilateral or unilateral subcostal incision, Makuuchi or modified Makuuchi incision. Thoracoabdominal incision may be required, especially in the removal of large malignant lesions as a block. The open retroperitoneal approach can be applied posteriorly or laterally.

Retroperitoneal anatomy of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: consequences for prevention and treatment of chronic inguinodynia.

Chronic inguinodynia is one of the most frequent complications after groin herniorrhaphy. We investigated the retroperitoneal anatomy of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve to prevent direct nerve injury during hernia repairs and to find the most advantageous approach for posterior triple neurectomy. We dissected the inguinal nerves in 30 human anatomic specimens bilaterally. The distances from each nerve and their entry points in the abdominal wall were measured in relation to the posterior superior iliac spine, anterior superior iliac spine, and the midpoint between the two iliac spines on the iliac crest. We evaluated our findings by creating high-resolution summation images. The courses of the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerve are most consistent on the anterior surface of the quadratus lumborum muscle. The genitofemoral nerve always runs on the psoas muscle. The entry points of the nerves in the abdominal wall are located as follows: the iliohypogastric nerve is above the iliac crest and lateral from the anterior superior iliac spine, the ilioinguinal nerve is with great variability, either above or below the iliac crest and lateral from the anterior superior iliac spine, the genital branch is around the internal inguinal ring, the femoral branch is either cranial or caudal to the iliopubic tract, and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is either medial or lateral to the anterior superior iliac spine. Nerve injury during inguinal hernia repairs can be avoided by taking the topographic anatomy of the inguinal nerves into consideration. The most advantageous plane to look for the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerve during posterior neurectomy is on the anterior surface of the quadratus lumborum muscle. For the surgical treatment of severe chronic inguinodynia, especially after posterior open or endoscopic mesh repair (TAPP/TEP), the retroperitoneoscopic or open retroperitoneal approach for posterior triple neurectomy can be considered.

Intraoperative salvage of a renal artery occlusion during fenestrated stent grafting

A 79-year-old man with a 6-cm juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm was treated by endovascular means with a fenestrated stent graft. The completion angiogram revealed a left renal artery occlusion. A retroperitoneal surgical approach allowed for retrograde catheterization of the occluded covered stent through the left renal artery. The covered stent was reopened by balloon angioplasty. After 2 months, the left renal artery was patent and renal function normal. At 6 months, both renal arteries were fully open on duplex imaging. The open retroperitoneal approach with retrograde catheterization is a bailout technique to avoid loss of a kidney in fenestrated stent grafting.

Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair via Endovascular Versus Open Retroperitoneal Approach

The beneficial effects of open surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair via a left retroperitoneal approach have been established. We compared the short-term outcome of infrarenal AAA repair via an endovascular approach with that of an open retroperitoneal approach. From October 2001 to April 2003, patients with infrarenal AAA >5 cm were offered repair via an endovascular approach (group I) with a variety of industry-made stent grafts or with an open retroperitoneal surgical approach (group II). Data were prospectively collected in the vascular registry and complications were analyzed. Data comparison between the two groups was done by using chi-squared analysis and two-tailed Students t-test. Statistical significance was identified at p < 0.05. Over an 18-month period, 492 patients underwent evaluation for AAA. Of these, 446 patients had infrarenal AAA and underwent either endovascular (group I: n = 175, male 85%, female 15%) or open surgical repair (group II: n = 232, male 74%, female 26%) via a left retroperitoneal approach. Group I patients had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (66% vs. 35%, p < 0.05), hypertension (74% vs. 43%, p < 0.05), chronic obstructed pulmonary disease (29% vs. 12%, p < 0.05), and diabetes mellitus (20% vs. 7%, p < 0.05), a lower mean amount of intraoperative blood loss (277 cc vs. 1452 cc, p < 0.05), and shorter length of stay in the hospital (1.7 days vs., 7.3 days, p < 0.05). Group I also had fewer complications of myocardial infarction (1.7% vs. 5.2%, p = NS), renal failure (0% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.05), pulmonary failure (1.7% vs. 2.6%, p = NS), ischemic colitis requiring colectomy (0.6% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.05), multisystem organ failure (0% vs. 1.3%, p = NS), and death (0.6% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.05). Despite increased preexisting comorbidities, patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair had less morbidity, mortality, and blood loss and a shorter in-hospital length of stay than patients undergoing open surgical aneurysm repair via a left retroperitoneal approach.

MISSED ANTERIOR CROSSING VESSELS DURING OPEN RETROPERITONEAL PYELOPLASTY: LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSPERITONEAL DISCOVERY AND REPAIR

Extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction due to anterior crossing segmental renal vessels is present in more than 50% of patients in adulthood. In this situation the ureter must usually be dismembered and transposed anterior to the crossing vascular structures, where it is anastomosed to the renal pelvis. Via the open retroperitoneal approach there may be a limited view of the anterior surface of the ureteropelvic junction and, hence, anterior crossing vessels may possibly be missed. We describe 2 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction in whom anterior vessels were missed during open retroperitoneal repair. Laparoscopic transperitoneal secondary pyeloplasty with posterior displacement of the crossing renal vessel was performed in each case. Two patients presented with symptomatic congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed endopyelotomy in 1 and failed open retroperitoneal procedures in both. Preoperatively spiral computerized tomography angiography with a ureteropelvic junction protocol revealed crossing vessels in the 2 cases. This finding was confirmed at transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty. The ureter and renal pelvis were transposed anterior to the crossing vessels and 2 rows of running sutures were placed to complete the anastomosis. The 2 laparoscopic procedures were completed successfully. The anterior crossing vessels were preserved in each case. Currently the patients are asymptomatic and furosemide washout renal scan was normal. Spiral CT angiography reliably delineates the renal vascular anatomy in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. This study may be valuable before planned open retroperitoneal ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty may successfully manage anterior crossing vessels associated with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

804 Open Retroperitoneal Approach vs. Gasless Endoscopic Retroperitoneal Approach for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Comparison of 126 Cases with Minimum 2-year Follow-up

Thalgott, John S. MD; Ameriks, John A. MD; Jordan, Frank T. MD; Giuffre, James M. BA; Fritts, Kay CRNFA

804 Open Retroperitoneal Approach vs. Gasless Endoscopic Retroperitoneal Approach for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Comparison of 126 Cases with Minimum 2-year Follow-up

804 Open Retroperitoneal Approach vs. Gasless Endoscopic Retroperitoneal Approach for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Comparison of 126 Cases with Minimum 2-year Follow-up