Open Reduction For Developmental Dysplasia Research Articles

Revision open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Re-dislocation after open reduction remains a challenge in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Few geographically and temporally diverse reports exist on the topic. The aim of this study was to uncover the outcome in a group of DDH patients who underwent repeat open reduction. All patients who had DDH surgery were screened at one hospital, spanning a ten-year period. Patients who underwent repeat open reduction for re-dislocation were included. Clinical data and radiographic parameters were obtained. This is a retrospective cohort study. Twenty-three revision open reductions were included. The median age (interquartile range) was 40 (26-61) months and the median follow-up duration was 26 (14-55.50) months. Fifteen revisions (65%) had at least one notable complication. Recurrent instability was found in nine revisions (39%), and other complications included avascular necrosis, stiffness and leg length discrepancy in 12 revisions (52%). Although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.13), all hips with pre-revision international hip dysplasia institute grade III (n = 4), compared to grade IV, remained stable after the re-operation. There is a substantial risk of dismal prognosis after repeat open reduction. Moreover, every precaution should be taken during the first surgery to reduce the risk of re-operation. Findings from this study may help inform surgeons and caregivers about the probable negative outcome when contemplating repeat open reduction.

Residual gait deviations in children treated by medial open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip at long-term follow-up: a comparison with healthy controls.

This study aimed to analyze and compare gait patterns and deviations at long-term follow-up in children who received medial open reduction (MOR) before 18months for unilateral or bilateral hip developmental dysplasia (DDH). A retrospective chart review was conducted on children who underwent MOR. The study population was divided into two groups: the unilateral group, including unilateral (five children with unilateral) and bilateral (five children with bilateral DDH). Ten healthy children were recruited for the control group. Spatiotemporal, kinematic, stiff-knee gait (SKG), and kinetic gait characteristics were analyzed. Stance time was significantly shorter in both the unilateral (median [IQR]; 590ms, [560.0-612.5] and bilateral (575ms, [550-637.5]) groups than in the control group (650, [602.5-677.5]) (p < 0.001), whereas swing time did not differ substantially (p = 0.065) There was no considerable difference in the mean knee flexion at swing between the unilateral (31.6°, [30-36]) and control (30.11°, [27.8-33.6] groups (p > 0.05), but the bilateral group (28.5°, [24.9-32.1]) showed the lower values than the other groups (p < 0.001 for bilateral vs unilateral group; p = 0.008 bilateral vs unilateral group). All the SKG parameters significantly differed among the groups in multi-group comparisons (p < 0.001 for each parameter). Three children had borderline SKG, and two had not-stiff limbs in the unilateral group. In the bilateral group, four children had stiff limbs, and one had borderline SKG. Most kinetic gait parameters were not statistically different between groups (p > 0.05). This study has revealed notable deviations in gait patterns of children with DDH treated by MOR at long-term follow-up compared to healthy children's gait. MOR could negatively affect pelvic motion during gait due to impaired functions of the iliopsoas and adductor muscles, and SKG can be encountered secondary to iliopsoas weakness.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Stiffness Following Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Most prior investigations on adverse outcomes after open reduction (OR) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) have focused on avascular necrosis, redislocation, and residual dysplasia. To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated risk factors for stiffness, an underappreciated source of postoperative morbidity. The goals of this study were to define the entity more clearly and evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for arthrofibrosis after OR for DDH. A retrospective study was conducted, including all open hip reductions for DDH performed by a single surgeon from 2009 to 2022. Preoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were used to calculate superior displacement, which was defined as the distance from the highest point of the proximal femoral metaphysis to the Hilgenreiner line, normalized by pelvic width. Cases treated with premature postoperative bracing cessation and/or referral to physical therapy with a resolution of stiffness within 6 months were categorized as mild arthrofibrosis. Cases that required >6 months of formal physical therapy for persistent range of motion concerns, manipulation under anesthesia, and/or inpatient rehabilitation admission were categorized as significant arthrofibrosis. This study included 170 hips with a mean age of 21.6 months (range: 6.1 to 93.6mo) and a mean follow-up of 46.8 months. 156 ORs (91.8%) were done through an anterior approach. Sixty-four patients (37.6%) had a concomitant isolated pelvic osteotomy, and 34 (20.0%) had both pelvic and femoral osteotomies. During the postoperative course, 109 patients (64.1%) had no arthrofibrosis, 38 (22.4%) had mild stiffness, and 23 (13.5%) had significant arthrofibrosis. On multivariable analysis, older age, superior displacement, and concomitant pelvic osteotomy were associated with any degree of arthrofibrosis (P< 0.05). Children older than 18 months or with dislocations higher than 16% of pelvic width had a 4.7 and 2.7 times higher risk, respectively, of experiencing some degree of stiffness postoperatively. Older age, high dislocations, and concomitant pelvic osteotomy without femoral shortening are risk factors for stiffness after OR for DDH. Surgeons should counsel families about the risk of postoperative stiffness, which occurred to some degree in 36% of our patients. Level IV.

The Value of Axial Imaging to Check Reduction after Anterior Approach Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Background: There are still many controversies regarding the diagnosis and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Axial imaging is routinely used after closed or open reduction to confirm reduction has occurred. In this study, we aimed to determine the rate of early re-dislocation or failure of reduction after anterior approach open reduction (AOR), to establish whether there is a true need for routinely performing post-operative axial imaging.&#x0D; Methods: We retrospectively reviewed radiographs, operation notes and post-operative CT scan images of our AOR cases from September 2018 to June 2020. The CT scan images were reviewed to check the post-operative reduction and congruency. The ‘posterior neckline’ and the ‘modified Shenton line’ were used to assess reduction. The related literature was also reviewed.&#x0D; Results: Thirty patients were included. The post-operative CT scans confirmed that all cases had reduced congruent hips. The CT scans did not change future treatment plans for any patient in this cohort and did not predict late re-dislocation.&#x0D; Conclusions: The rate of early re-dislocation or failure of reduction after AOR was negligible. Traditional routine axial imaging after this operation is therefore unjustified and has no value in predicting possible late re-dislocations. It also comes at the cost of extra radiation to the child and expense for the health system. We recommend stopping the routine use of post-operative axial imaging and using it selectively for specific indications, including teratologic and neuromuscular hips, bilateral DDH, and after revision surgery, in addition to closed reductions and medial approach open reduction.

Children’s orthopaedics

The February 2024 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: Hip impingement after in situ pinning causes decreased flexion and forced external rotation in flexion on 3D-CT; Triplane ankle fracture patterns in paediatric patients; Improved forearm rotation even after early conversion to below-elbow; Selective dorsal rhizotomy and cerebral palsy (CP) hip displacement; Abduction bracing following anterior open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip does not improve residual dysplasia or reduce secondary surgery; 40% risk of later total hip arthroplasty for in situ slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) pinning; Does brace treatment following closed reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip improve acetabular coverage?; Waterproof hip spica casts for paediatric femur fractures.

Femoral Head Remodeling After Surgical Reduction of Developmental Hip Dislocations.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is prevalent and is associated with dysplasia of both the femoral head and acetabulum. There is a paucity of literature describing femoral head remodeling after surgical reduction of developmentally dislocated hips. The purpose of this study was to describe and quantify changes in femoral head sphericity after closed or open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip. A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with typical developmental hip dislocations who underwent closed or open reduction from 2009 to 2022 at a single institution and had immediate postoperative and average 3-week follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. A subset of patients also had 3-year follow-up MRI scans. Patients with insufficient imaging or bony procedures at the time of reduction were excluded. We developed a technique to quantify femoral head "sphericity" by comparing differences in measured radii of the femoral head on axial and coronal plane MRI slices. We then calculated the variance of the radii for each plane and averaged these to calculate a combined variance. The variance was used to represent "sphericity," with a larger variance indicating a wider distribution of radii and thus a less spherical shape. A total of 74 patients (69 females) with 96 hips were included in this series. The median age of the child at the time of reduction was 8.7 months [interquartile range (IQR): 2.2]. Over half (58.3%) of the hips had a closed reduction, whereas the remaining were open reduced (41.7%). Immediately postoperatively, at the 3-week time point, and at the 3-year time point the median combined variance was 1.1 (IQR: 3.93), 0.51 (IQR: 1.32), and 0.31 (IQR: 0.50), respectively, indicating improved sphericity over time. Sphericity of the femoral head in developmental hip dislocations improves in both the immediate postoperative period, as well as the first few years after reduction. Further research is needed to evaluate the mechanism of remodeling, the ideal timing of reduction, and the relationship between femoral head and acetabular remodeling. Level IV-case series, therapeutic study.

Abduction Bracing Following Anterior Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Does Not Improve Residual Dysplasia or Reduce Secondary Surgery.

Abduction bracing is commonly used following open reduction and spica casting of developmental dysplasia of the hip. However, there is little evidence to support or refute this practice that carries associated cost and burden for families. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of abduction bracing after open reduction in improving the acetabular dysplasia and reducing the rate of secondary surgery for residual dysplasia. This is a retrospective study of patients treated with open reduction at a single tertiary referral center. Demographic data, severity of dislocation [International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) class], age at reduction, and casting duration were obtained. Patients were prescribed no bracing, part-time (≤18h/d), or full-time (≥20h/d) brace wear based on surgeon preference. Acetabular index (AI) measurements were obtained at cast removal and at 2- and 4-year follow-up. A total of 146 hips underwent open reduction with 61% (89/146) of hips treated with abduction bracing. There was no difference between braced and nonbraced cohorts with regards to sex, age at time of reduction, dislocation severity, cast duration, immediate postcasting AI, or incidence of medial open reduction. There was no difference in hips treated with or without brace following open reduction with regards to AI at 2 years postreduction (31.8±6.7 vs. 30.4±6.1 degrees, P =0.27) or at 4 years postreduction (24.9±6.5 vs. 24.7±6.5 degrees, P =0.97). However, further analysis showed lower mean AI at 2-year follow-up for braced versus nonbraced patients following medial open reduction (30.0±5.7 vs. 34.5±7.0 degrees, P =0.02). This difference was no longer present at 4-year follow-up (26.6±6.8 vs. 24.2±6.6 degrees, P =0.44). However, 4/19 (21%) nonbraced hips underwent secondary surgery for residual dysplasia and were consequently excluded from the AI measurement at 4 years postreduction (compared with 4/39 [10%] braced hips within the same time period). There was no difference in the rate of secondary surgery between braced and nonbraced hips (30% vs. 33%, respectively, P =0.70). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that neither IHDI classification, bracing, nor age at reduction predicted residual dysplasia. Abduction bracing following anterior open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip is not associated with decreased residual dysplasia at 2/4 years postreduction or with decreased secondary surgery. These results suggest that abduction bracing following anterior open reduction may not provide clinical benefit. However, abduction bracing may be beneficial following medial open reduction. A prospective study is necessary to provide more definitive recommendations. Level III-therapeutic study.

Debulking of Ligamentum Teres—A Technique to Preserve the Ligamentum in Open Reduction of DDH

Debulking of Ligamentum Teres—A Technique to Preserve the Ligamentum in Open Reduction of DDH

Modified Capsulorrhaphy Technique in Open Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Neglected patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are not uncommon. Various treatment modalities have been used. Capsulorrhaphy is one of the most critical steps during the process of open reduction of DDH. Inadequate capsulorrhaphy technique can increase the failure rate of open reduction procedures. This study presented the clinical and radiographic results of using a new capsulorrhaphy technique. Between November 2005 and March 2018, 540 DDH in 462 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age at surgery was 31 months. All patients underwent a modified capsulorrhaphy technique developed by the main author (with or without additional pelvic or femoral procedures). Postoperative patient assessment during the follow-up period was performed both clinically and radiologically. Follow-up period ranged between 36 months and 12 years. Based on the modified McKay score, good and excellent outcomes were obtained in 90.3%. Functional results were better in younger age (less than 39mo). Both acetabular index and lateral center edge angle showed significant improvement at 3 years follow-ups. Proximal femoral growth disturbance (PFGD) was encountered in 92 hips. Classes 2 and 3 did not affect the functional results, whereas patients with PFGD classes 4 and 5 had fair to poor functional outcomes. There were 12 hips with redislocation. Revision was done using the same capsulorrhaphy technique. Using the index technique of capsulorrhaphy in DDH surgery is safe, reliable, and yields good functional and radiologic outcomes with a relatively low complication rate. Level IV-therapeutic retrospective case series.

Redislocation After Posteromedial Open Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Analyzing the Risk Factors and Determining the Optimal Treatment Method.

Redislocation, which is one of the most serious problems in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), might occur because of several reasons. Regardless of the treatment, redislocations are reported to be associated with high complication rates in the literature. Our objective was to identify the risk factors for redislocation in the patients treated for DDH and to determine the optimal treatment method for redislocations. Patients with DDH who were treated with the limited posteromedial approach in our clinic between 1993 and 2021 and followed up prospectively were examined in this single-centered study. The participants were assigned into 2 groups: a study group consisting of 25 hips of 17 patients with redislocation and a control group consisting of 502 hips of 390 patients without redislocation. To determine the risk factors for redislocation, demographic data, known risk factors for DDH, preoperative Tönnis stage, and whether the capsule was opened or not were evaluated. To determine the optimal treatment method, a subgroup analysis based on applied treatment (closed reduction and cast replacement vs. repeating open reduction) was conducted, and recurrent redislocation, complication, and secondary surgery rates were evaluated. Bilaterality and high-grade hip dislocations were found to be associated with higher odds ratio (OR) for redislocation [ P =0.007, OR=3.64, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3 to 8.8; and P =0.006, OR=4.52, 95% CI, 1.37 to 14.91, respectively]. Recurrent redislocation and complication rates were found to be significantly higher in redislocations treated with closed reduction and cast replacement ( P =0.007 and P =0.015, respectively). Bilaterality and higher preoperative Tönnis stage are critical risk factors for redislocation after open reduction in DDH. It should be kept in mind that closed reduction and cast replacement is associated with higher rates of recurrent redislocation and complications, and redislocation cases should be treated by repeating open reduction. Level II-therapeutic study.

Retrospective Comparison of Outcomes Between Closed and Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children Aged 6-24Months.

We aimed to compare the outcomes between closed reduction (CR) and open reduction (OR) in children aged 6-24months with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) who could be reduced safely and stably by the closed reduction operation. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 77 patients who underwent CR or OR for DDH. Fifty-one patients (56 hips) underwent CR, 26 (29 hips) underwent OR. The demographic data, International Hip Dysplasia Institute classification and acetabular index (AI) before reduction and the centre-edge angle (CEA), AI, Alsberg angle (AA), Reimer's migration index (RMI), and height-to-width index (HWI) of the epiphysis were compared between two groups at the final follow-up. The percentage of coxa magna > 15% of the normal side and AA > 81° were calculated. At the final follow-up, the mean AA in the CR and OR groups were 77.66° (60°-89°) and 81.97° (73°-91°) (p = 0.001), respectively, there were 32.14% and 58.62% of the hips with an AA > 81° (p = 0.019). The frequency of coxa magna > 15% of the normal side was higher in the OR group (60.9%) than in the CR group (6.5%) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the improvement of AI, CEA, HWI, and RMI. In children aged 6-24months with DDH, if a stable and safe CR can be obtained but with medial joint space up to 6mm, CR should be attempted first.

Impact of Failed Pavlik Harness Treatment on the Outcomes Following Closed or Open Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

To investigate the impact of failed Pavlik harness (PH) treatment on the outcomes following closed reduction (CR) or open reduction (OR) in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Ninety-three DDH patients treated with CR or OR were enrolled. One group of which received previous PH treatment (F group) and the other (L group) not. The clinical outcomes were evaluated according to McKay's criteria. Radiographs were evaluated for acetabular index (AI) and the degree of dislocation of the hips. A higher rate of CR was found in F group (P = 0.034). Before CR/OR, the mean AI in F group was significantly lower than that in L group (P = 0.000), while at the last follow-up, the AIs in both groups were all improved. In F group, there were 7 (16.67%), 18 (42.86%) and 17 (40.48%) hips were classified as Graf type II, III and IV pathologic changes, respectively, when PH treatment started, while the corresponding data were 17 (40.48%), 17 (40.48%) and 8 (19.05%) after PH treatment (P = 0.024). At the last follow-up, no significant difference was found concerning the complications between the two groups (P>0.05). PH treatment, even if failed, may have the ability of accelerating the development of the acetabulum and increasing the rate of successful CR. Thus we advocate a trial of PH treatment for all DDH patients less than 6months of age. Meanwhile, a close monitoring by dynamic ultrasonography is required due to the risk of AVN.

Surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children - A monocentric study about 414 hips.

Introduction: No consensus exists about the open reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH; age of surgery and the need for additional bone surgery). We report clinical and radiological outcomes of a large monocentric study. The objectives are to analyze outcomes and to give recommendations. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective review of 414 hips (301 patients) operated on for DDH between 2010 and 2018. The mean age at the time of surgery was 34.6 months (14–96 months). In all, 72 hips had open reduction (OR) alone, 130 had OR with femoral osteotomy, 37 had OR with pelvic osteotomy, and 175 hips OR was associated with femoral and pelvic osteotomy. The mean follow-up was 6.5 years (3–10 years). Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to Mckay’s classification. The acetabular index was measured, and Severin classification was used for radiological outcomes. Reduction failure and residual dysplasia were noted, and avascular necrosis of femoral head (AVN) was assessed according to Kalamchi and MacEwen classification. Results: At the last follow-up, 331 hips (80.2%) had good clinical results, and 319 (77%) had satisfactory radiological results. The AI measured on the last follow-up radiograph was ≤25° in 350 hips. AVN was noted in 83 hips (20%). Redislocation was founded in 53 hips (12%). Overall: 293 hips (72%) had stable reduction without AVN with good clinical and radiological outcomes. Discussion: Clinical outcomes are better and the risk of AVN decreases significantly when a femoral osteotomy is performed. There were better radiological results when pelvic osteotomy was performed. The rate of residual dysplasia was higher when pelvic osteotomy was not performed. We recommend a femoral shortening osteotomy for high dislocations (Tönnis 3 or 4) for children over 18 months and a pelvic osteotomy for children over 36 months or over 18 months with an acetabular index > 25°.

Is capsulorrhaphy a necessary step during open reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip? A randomized controlled trial.

To investigate the necessity of performing capsulorrhaphy during open reduction of DDH. A single-centre, prospective,randomized controlled trial was conducted between 2015 and 2020. The study included 82 hips in 67 patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) who were treated with open reduction via the anterior approach. Patients were randomized into two equal groups (41 hips in each group); group A (capsulorrhaphy was done) and group B (capsulorrhaphy was not done). Dega osteotomy was performed in all cases, while femoral derotation shortening osteotomy was performed only in four hips in group A and four hips in group B. The mean age at the time of surgery was 33 ± 22.3months. The follow-up period was 24months for all patients. At the final follow-up, maintenance of reduction was chosen as the primary outcome and was assessed radiologically by the Severin's grading system. Secondary outcome measures were functional evaluation (by using the modified McKay's criteria), Shenton line assessment, acetabular index measurement, and complications. According to the Severin's grading system, concentric reduction was achieved in 36 hips in group A and 37 hips in group B, subluxation occurred in three hips in each group, and redislocation was encountered in two hips in group A and one hip in group B. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups (p-value = 0.239). According to the modified McKay's criteria, the results were satisfactory (excellent and good) in 34 hips (82.9%) in group A and 36 hips (87.8%) in group B. The difference was statistically insignificant (p-value = 0.352). The rate of complications was higher in group A (17.1%) than group B (12.2%) (p-value = 0.532). The stability of the hip joint after open reduction depends mainly on adequate removal of soft tissue obstacles that impede reduction and proper correction of the bony configuration of the hip using pelvic and/or femoral osteotomy. So, the authors believe that capsulorrhaphy is not necessary in the surgical management of DDH, provided that adequate soft tissue and bony gestures are combined.

Greater presence of receptors for relaxin in the ligamentum teres of female infants who undergo open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip

BackgroundWhile many factors involved in the etiology of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), one of which is the hormone relaxin. Relaxin concentrations in patients with DDH may lead to pathodynamic changes during hip development by altering the physiological nature of the ligament, as well as by long-term exposure to relaxin during pregnancy. Our objective in this study was to determine the number of relaxin receptors in the ligamentum teres and their role in causing DDH.MethodsWe identified 26 infants between birth and 3 years of age who had undergone open reduction for DDH between 2010 and 2012. 12 hips of 12 miss abortus fetus between 20 to 35 weeks of gestation were used as control group. Specimens obtained from two groups were stained with Relaxin-2 antibody, and the amount of staining for relaxin receptors was determined using an ordinal H score.ResultsThe mean (SD) H scores of infants with DDH were significantly higher than those of controls: 215 (59) versus 52 (48); P = 0.00; 95% CI. Statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender was not found.ConclusionAs a result, increased number of relaxin receptors in the ligamentum teres could be a risk factor for DDH.Level of evidenceLevel 2, Prospective comparative study.

Evaluation of Acetabular Development Following Open Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip in Children After Walking Age.

The growth and development of the acetabulum in children with developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) depends upon the extent of concentric reduction. Children in walking age often need open reduction with or without additional osteotomies to obtain congruous, stable reduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate acetabular development in late diagnosed DDH treated by open reduction with or without femoral osteotomy. This is a retrospective study of 29 children (40 hips) with idiopathic DDH, previously untreated managed by open reduction with or without femoral osteotomy. We analyzed preoperative and yearly postoperative radiographs up to 6years of age for acetabular development by measuring acetabular index. Acetabular remodeling was assessed with a graphical plot of serial mean acetabular index. Those with AI < 30° at outcome measure point of 6years of patient age were considered to have satisfactory acetabular remodeling. Mean age of surgery was 26.8months. Open reduction alone was done in 14 hips and open reduction with concurrent femoral osteotomy done in 26 hips. The mean acetabular index pre operatively was 36.6° ± 5.9° which reduced to 29.7° ± 6° at 1-year follow-up and to 26.6° ± 5.9° at 2-year follow-up. 28 out of 40 hips were available for evaluation at outcome measure point of 6years of age, which showed satisfactory remodeling in 24 hips with mean AI of 22.7° ± 5.7°. Maximum acetabular development was seen at 2years post-surgery and better remodeling was seen in children operated at less than 2years of age. 5 hips had changes of avascular necrosis of femoral head. There was no incidence of redislocation/subluxation at latest follow-up. Open reduction in late-diagnosed developmental dysplasia of hip has potential for favourable acetabular development. Femoral osteotomy when required along with open reduction may suffice to address acetabular dysplasia found in the initial years of management of DDH.

Day-case open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

AimsOpen reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is regularly performed despite screening programmes, due to failure of treatment or late presentation. A protocol for open reduction of DDH has been refined through collaboration between surgical, anaesthetic, and nursing teams to allow same day discharge. The objective of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of performing open reduction of DDH as a day case.MethodsA prospectively collected departmental database was visited. All consecutive surgical cases of DDH between June 2015 and March 2020 were collected. Closed reductions, bilateral cases, cases requiring corrective osteotomy, and children with comorbidities were excluded. Data collected included demographics, safety outcome measures (blood loss, complications, readmission, reduction confirmation), and feasibility for discharge according to the Face Legs Activity Cry Consolidability (FLACC) pain scale. A satisfaction questionnaire was filled by the carers. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.ResultsOut of 168 consecutive DDH cases, 16 patients fit the inclusion criteria (age range 10 to 26 months, 13 female). Intraoperative blood loss ranged from "minimal" to 120 ml, and there were no complications or readmissions. The FLACC score was 0 for all patients. The carers satisfaction questionnaire expressed high satisfaction from the experience with adequate information and support provided.ConclusionOpen reduction in DDH, without corrective osteotomy, is safe and feasible to be managed as a day case procedure. It requires a clear treatment pathway, analgesia, sufficient counselling, and communication with carers. It is even more important during the COVID-19 pandemic when reduced length of hospital stay is likely to be safer for both patient and their parents.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2021;2(4):271–277.

Secondary Surgery and Residual Dysplasia Following Late Closed or Open Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Outcomes studies following successful closed reduction of late-detected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) reveal high rates of secondary reconstructive surgery with limited comparative data demonstrating lower rates of residual dysplasia with open reduction. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcomes, with regard to radiographic evidence of residual dysplasia and secondary reconstructive procedures, between late closed and late open reduction for DDH in patients 6 to 24 months of age at reduction. We identified all patients between 6 and 24 months of age who underwent closed or open reduction for DDH between 1980 and 2008 and were followed until at least 10 years of age. Outcomes included radiographic measurement of acetabular dysplasia after triradiate cartilage closure, development of osteonecrosis, and the need for secondary procedures for residual dysplasia. One hundred and four hips underwent index closed reduction and 54 hips underwent index open reduction. There was no significant difference in the age at reduction (p = 0.07). Among the 116 hips for which initial anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were available, most closed reductions (55%) were performed in International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade-III hips whereas most open reductions (71%) were performed in IHDI grade-IV hips. Analysis of the hips that did not undergo a secondary procedure showed that those with an index open reduction had a greater lateral center-edge angle (mean and standard deviation, 27.2° ± 10.0° versus 22.4° ± 6.8° in the closed reduction cohort; p = 0.02), lower femoral head extrusion index (22.2% ± 8.9% versus 26.0% ± 6.2%; p = 0.04), and lower Sharp angle (43.3° ± 6.0° versus 46.6° ± 3.1°; p = 0.002) at triradiate closure. There was no difference in the prevalence of osteonecrosis (Bucholz-Ogden grades II, III, and IV) between the closed and open reduction cohorts (22% versus 19%, respectively; p = 0.60). Secondary procedures were performed more frequently after closed reduction than after open reduction (47% versus 30%, respectively; p = 0.03). In patients with late reduction of DDH, closed reduction was associated with increased residual dysplasia and it was associated with a higher rate of secondary surgery in those >12 months old despite a decreased severity of displacement based on the IHDI classification. Additional, prospective studies with assessment of functional outcomes are needed to validate these findings. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anterior approach with mini-bikini incision in open reduction in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip

PurposeThe anterior and medial approaches in open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) had been widely used. The former could not directly approach the intra-articular interposition, while the latter had been associated with injury to blood vessel and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Meanwhile, the bikini incision had also been mentioned in some studies. The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified anterior approach through a mini-bikini incision and report its short-term outcomes.MethodsData of DDH patients younger than 2 years at the time of surgery who had received this mini-bikini incision between June 2013 and December 2018 were collected. The surgical technique, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and length of incision were recorded in detail. In the latest follow up, the objective measurement of the scar and the subjective feeling towards the scar were collected. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at the last follow-up, and the incidence of residual dysplasia, redislocation, and femoral head AVN was analyzed.ResultsForty-three cases (49 hips) were included with an averaged follow-up of 43 months. The operation duration was 22 min, and the blood loss was 9.8 ml on average. The length of the scar averaged 2.6 cm. The mean University of North Carolina “4P” scar scale (UNC4P) for the scar was 0.92, and no patients complained numbness. Overall, all the parents were satisfied with the cosmetic appearance. The mean acetabular index (AI) was 27.42° ± 6.41° in dislocated hip in the last follow-up. One hip redislocated soon after the operation and was reduced in a closed manner right away. MRI showed improved coverage but still some residual dysplasia that was in accordance with the post-operative recovery nature. Four hips (8%) had signs of AVN in X-ray.ConclusionOpen reduction through the anterior approach with the mini-bikini incision was a safe procedure with comparable outcomes to classical approaches. It would be a complementary approach for DDH patients younger than 2 years old who need an open reduction.

Revision of Failed Open Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

BackgroundThe most common causes of re-dislocation after open reduction are inadequate exposure and failure to release the obstructing soft tissues inside and around the hip.MethodsThis clinical study included 33 consecutive children (34 hips) who underwent a revision surgery after failed open reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).ResultsAccording to the McKay clinical criteria, the results were good in 28 cases (82.4%), fair in 4 cases (11.8%), and poor in 2 cases with re-dislocation (5.9%). Radiological results according to the modified Severin criteria were as follows: 28 hips (82.4%) were identified as category 2 (good), 4 hips (11.8%) category 4 (fair), and 2 hips (5.9%) category 5 (poor).ConclusionsRevision surgery for DDH is demanding and the long-term consequences are usually serious, but stable, concentric reduction should be obtained either at the first or second open reduction by addressing the causes of failure. Failed acetabulum remodeling and technical errors with inadequate soft-tissue release were the most common causes of failure in the primary operation. Based on the results, the outcome of revision surgery after failed open reduction for DDH was good.