Open Reduction And Internal Fixation Procedures Research Articles

Factors predicting complications following open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal radius fracture.

This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of the complications after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of intra-articular distal radius fracture (IADRF) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Medical records and outpatient follow-up records were retrospectively reviewed to collect medical, surgical, and complication data on consecutive patients who had undergone an ORIF procedure for an IADRF between January 2019 and June 2022. Data included demographics, comorbidities, injury, surgical characteristics, and laboratory findings on admission. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to identify the significant predictors, with a composite of any complications occurring within 12 months after the operation as the outcome variable and potentially a range of clinical data as the independent variables. The magnitude of the relationship was indicated by the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). During the study period, 474 patients were included, and 64 had documented complications (n = 73), representing an accumulated rate of 13.5%. Among them, carpal tunnel syndrome was the most common, followed by tenosynovitis caused by tendon irritation/rupture, superficial or deep wound infection, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1, radial shortening (≥4 mm), plate/screw problems, and others. The multivariate results showed the following factors significantly associated with increased risk of complications: experience of DRF surgery with <30 cases (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.6-3.5), AO type C fracture (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.9), initial lunate facet collapse of ≥5 mm (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.4-8.9), and use of temporary external fixation before index surgery (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-4.3). These findings may aid in patient counseling and quality improvement initiatives, and IADRF should be directed by an experienced surgeon.

A clinical prediction model for predicting the surgical site infection after an open reduction and internal fixation procedure considering the NHSN/SIR risk model: a multicenter case-control study.

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common surgical-related complications worldwide, particularly in developing countries. SSI is responsible for mortality, long hospitalization period, and a high economic burden. This hospital-based case-control study was conducted in six educational hospitals in Tehran, Iran. A total of 244 patients at the age of 18-85 years who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) surgery were included in this study. Among the 244 patients, 122 patients who developed SSIs were selected to be compared with 122 non-infected patients used as controls. At the second stage, all patients (n = 350) who underwent ORIF surgery in a hospital were selected for an estimation of the standardized infection ratio (SIR). A logistic regression model was used for predicting the most important factors associated with the occurrence of SSIs. Finally, the performance of the ORIF prediction model was evaluated using discrimination and calibration indices. Data were analyzed using R.3.6.2 and STATA.14 software. Klebsiella (14.75%) was the most frequently detected bacterium in SSIs following ORIF surgery. The results revealed that the most important factors associated with SSI following an ORIF procedure were found to be elder age, elective surgery, prolonged operation time, American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ≥2, class 3 and 4 wound, and preoperative blood glucose levels of >200 mg/dl; while preoperative higher hemoglobin level (g/dl) was found to be a protective factor. The evidence for the interaction effect between age and gender, body mass index and gender, and age and elective surgery were also observed. After assessing the internal validity of the model, the overall performance of the models was found to be good with an area under the curve of 95%. The SIR of SSI for ORIF surgery in the selected hospital was 0.66 among the patients aged 18-85 years old. New risk prediction models can help in detecting high-risk patients and monitoring the infection rate in hospitals based on their infection prevention and control programs. Physicians using prediction models can identify high-risk patients with these factors prior to ORIF procedure.

Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly U.S. Population: A Cross-Sectional Study of Treatment Trends and Comparison of Complication Rates after Joint Replacement, Open Reduction and Internal Fixation, and Non-Surgical Management.

Proximal humerus fracture (PHF) treatment remains challenging. Multiple therapy options exist, and the optimal choice of management has been increasingly discussed in the literature. The aim of this study was to (1) analyze trends in the propensity of proximal humerus fracture treatments and (2) compare complication rates after joint replacement, surgical repair, and non-surgical treatment in terms of mechanical complications, union failure, and infection rates. In this cross-sectional study, patients aged 65 years or older with proximal humerus fractures occurring between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 were identified from Medicare physician service claims records. The Kaplan-Meier method with the Fine and Gray adjustment was used to calculate the cumulative incidence rates for malunion/nonunion, infection, and mechanical complications for the following treatment categories: shoulder arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and non-surgical treatment, respectively. Semiparametric Cox regression was performed incorporating 23 demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic covariates to determine risk factors. Between 2009 through 2019, conservative procedures decreased by 0.9%. ORIF procedures decreased from 9.51% (95% CI: 8.7-10.4) to 6.95% (95% CI: 6.2-7.7), whereas shoulder arthroplasties rose from 1.99% (95% CI: 1.6-2.4), to 5.45% (95% CI: 4.8-6.2). PHFs managed through ORIF were associated with higher union failure rates compared to conservatively treated fractures (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15-1.5, p < 0.001). The risk of developing an infection was increased after joint replacement compared to ORIF (2.66% vs. 1.09%, HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.46-2.98, p < 0.001). Mechanical complications were more common after joint replacement (6.37% vs. 4.85%, HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.32-2.09, p < 0.001). Complication rates differed significantly across treatment modalities. This should be considered when choosing a management procedure. Vulnerable elderly patient cohorts could be identified, and the optimization of modifiable risk factors might lead to a decrease of complication rates in both surgically and non-surgically treated patients.

The Outcome of Orthopedics Treatment of Lombok Earthquake Victim 2018: A Cohort of One-Year Follow-Up Study-Lesson Learned After Lombok Earthquake.

There was a magnitude 7 on the Richter scale earthquake on Lombok Island in 2018, causing more than 500 deaths. In the event of earthquakes, there is often an imbalance between overcrowding in hospitals and inadequate resources. The initial management of earthquake victims with musculoskeletal injuries is controversial, arguing over whether to utilize debridement, external or internal fixation, or conservative or operative treatment in an acute onset disaster situation. This study aims to determine the outcome of initial management after the 2018 Lombok earthquake, between immediate open-reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and Non-ORIF procedures after one year follow-up. This is a cohort study to evaluate radiological and clinical outcomes one year after orthopedic treatment in the Lombok earthquake 2018. The subjects were recruited from eight public health center and one hospital in Lombok in September 2019. We evaluate radiological outcomes (non/malunion and union) and clinical outcomes (infection and SF-36 score). Based on 73 subjects, the ORIF group has a higher union rate than the non-ORIF group (31.1% vs. 68.9%; p = 0.021). Incidence of infection only appeared in the ORIF group (23.5%). Clinical outcome as measured by SF36 showed the ORIF group had a lower mean of general health (p = 0.042) and health change (p = 0.039) clinical outcomes than the non-ORIF group. The most affected public group is the productive age with significant impact on social-economy. ORIF procedure is a major risk factor of infection in initial treatment after earthquake. Therefore, definitive operation with internal fixation is not recommended in the initial phase of a disaster. Damage Control Orthopedic (DCO) surgery protocol is the treatment of choice in acute disaster setting. The ORIF group had better radiological outcomes than the non-ORIF group. However the ORIF group had higher cases of infection and lower SF-36 than the non-ORIF group. Definitive treatment in acute onset disaster setting should be prevented.

Implant Removal Due to Infection After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: Trends and Predictors.

Implant removal due to infection is one of the major causes failure following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The aim of this study was to determine trends and predictors of infection-relatedimplantremoval following ORIF of extremities using a nationally representative database. Nationwide Inpatient Sample data from 2006 to 2017 was used to identify cases of ORIF following upper and lower extremity fractures, as well as cases that underwent infection-relatedimplantremoval following ORIF. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of infection-relatedimplantremoval, controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities, hospital characteristics, site of fracture, and year. For all ORIF procedures, the highest rate of implant removal due to infection was the phalanges/hand (5.61%), phalanges/foot (5.08%), and the radius/ulna (4.85%). Implantremoval rates due to infection decreased in all fractures except radial/ulnar fractures. Tarsal/metatarsal fractures (odds ratio (OR)=1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-2.05), and tibial fractures (OR=1.82, 95% CI: 1.45-2.28) were identified as independent predictors of infection-related implant removal. Male gender (OR=1.67, 95% CI: 1.49-1.87), Obesity (OR=1.85, 95% CI: 1.34-2.54), diabetes mellitus with chronic complications (OR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.13-2.54, P<0.05), deficiency anemia (OR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.14-2.22) were patient factors that were associated with increased infection-related removals. Removal of implant due to infection had a higher total charge associated with the episode of care (mean: $166,041) than non-infection related implant removal (mean: $133,110). Implantremoval rates due to infection decreased in all fractures except radial/ulnar fractures. Diabetes, liver disease, and rheumatoid arthritis were important predictors of infection-relatedimplantremoval. The study identified some risk factors for implant related infection following ORIF, such as diabetes, obesity, and anemia, that should be studied further to implement strategies to reduce rate of infection following ORIF.

Surgeon volume and risk of deep surgical site infection following open reduction and internal fixation of closed ankle fracture.

Increasing evidences have shown that surgeon volume was associated with postoperative complications or outcomes in a variety of orthopaedics surgeries, but few were focused on ankle fractures. This study aimed to investigate the deep surgical site infection (DSSI) in association with the surgeon volume following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures. This was a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data on patients who underwent ORIF for acute closed ankle fractures between October 2014 and June 2020. Surgeon volume was defined as the number of ORIF procedures performed within 12 months preceding the index operation. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to determine the optimal cut-off value, whereby surgeon volume was dichotomized as high or low. The outcome was DSSI within 1year postoperatively. Multivariate logistics analysis was performed to examine the DSSI in association with surgeon volume and multiple sensitivity/subgroup analyses were performed to refine the findings. Among 1562 patients, 33 (2.1%) developed a DSSI. The optimal cut-off value was 7/year. Low-volume (<7/year) was significantly associated with a 5.0-fold increased risk of DSSI (95%CI, 2.2-11.3; P < .001). Sensitivity/subgroup analyses restricted to patients aged <65 years, with or without concurrent fractures, with unimalleolar fractures, bi- or trimalleolar fractures, receiving ORIF within 14 days and those operated by ≥10-year experience surgeons showed the consistently significant results (ORs, 2.7-6.8, all P < .05). The surgeon volume of <7 cases/year is associated with an increased risk of DSSI. It is more feasible that patients with complex fractures or conditions (eg, bi- and trimalleolar or presence of concurrent fractures) are preferentially directed to high-volume and experienced surgeons.

Validation of a Novel Smartphone-Based Electronic Data Capture System Following Surgical Fixation of Distal Radial Fractures.

Large prospective institutional data provide the opportunity to conduct level II and III studies using robust methodologies and adequately powered sample-sizes, while circumventing limitations of retrospective databases. We aimed to validate a prospective data collection tool, the Orthopaedic Minimal Data Set Episode of Care (OME), implemented at a tertiary North American health care system for distal radial fracture (DRF) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The first 100 DRF ORIFs performed after OME inception (February 2015) were selected for this validation study. A blinded review of the operative notes and charts was performed, and extracted data of 75 perioperative DRF ORIF procedure variables were compared with OME collected data for agreement. Outcomes included completion rates and agreement measures in OME versus electronic medical record (EMR)-based control datasets. Data counts were evaluated using raw percentages and McNemar tests. Cohen (κ) and concordance correlation coefficient analyzed categorical and numerical variable agreement, respectively. Overall, OME demonstrated superior completion and agreement parameters versus EMR-based retrospective review. Nine data points (12.0%) demonstrated significantly higher completion rates within the OME dataset (P < .05, each), and 88% (66/75) of captured variables demonstrated similar completion rates. Up to 80.0% (60/75) of variables either demonstrated an agreement proportion of ≥0.90 or were solely reported in the OME. Of 33 variables eligible for agreement analyses, 36.4% (12/33) demonstrated almost perfect agreement (κ > 0.80), and 63.6% (21/33) exhibited almost perfect or substantial agreement (κ > 0.60). The OME is a valid and accurate prospective data collection tool for DRF ORIF that is reliably able to match or supersede traditional retrospective chart review. Future investigations could use this tool for large-scale analyses investigating peri/intraoperative DRF ORIF variables.

Percutaneous cannulated cancellous screw fixation v/s open reduction and internal fixation with plating for intra-articular calcaneal fractures

Introduction: The calcaneus is the largest tarsal bone and the most commonly fractured. Calcaneal fractures account for about 2% of all fractures, with 75 percent of these being intra-articular. Anatomic restoration in intra-articular calcaneal fractures was not always associated with a positive outcome in terms of quality of life, hence the best treatment option is still up for debate. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is considered an exemplary modality for treating calcaneal fractures. Soft tissue complications after ORIF procedures, on the other hand, have been reported to be as high as 30%. Scholars have advocated external fixation, percutaneous cannulated cancellous screw fixation, and Schanz pin assisted reduction and fixation as minimally invasive methods to reduce postoperative problems. In the present study, we aim to study the outcome of intra-articular calcaneum fractures treated with percutaneous cannulated cancellous screws V/S open reduction internal fixation with calcaneum plates. Materials and Methods: 22 patients with intra-articular calcaneum fracture (with displacement > 2mm) were recruited for the study after taking informed written consent. Patients were divided randomly into 2 groups; Group A were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous cannulated cancellous (CC) screw fixation. While patients in Group B were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plating. The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad during the period of May-2020 to May-2021. Pre-operative and post-operative Bohler’s angles were calculated using PACS, functional outcome was assessed at 6 months post-operatively using AOFAS score and post operative pain was assessed using VAS score. Results: The present study indicated no significant difference in the post-operative maintenance of Bohler’s angle when operated by either of the techniques. But, functional outcome in terms of AOFAS score when assessed at the end of 6 months indicated an excellent and good outcome in patients operated with cannulated cancellous screws as compared to patients operated with ORIF with calcaneum plating. Post operative complications were reported significantly high in group of patients operated with ORIF with plating as compared to percutaneous CC screw group patients. Conclusion: Percutaneous minimally invasive fixation using cannulated cancellous screws are better choice than ORIF with calcaneum plating due to lesser post operative pain and soft tissue complications, better functional outcome in terms of AOFAS score and lesser implant related soft tissue complications.

Surgeon volume and the risk of deep surgical site infection following open reduction and internal fixation of closed tibial plateau fracture.

Emerging evidences supported that the surgeon case volume significantly affected post-operative complications or outcomes following a range of elective or non-elective orthopaedic surgery; no data has been available for surgically treated tibial plateau fractures. We aimed to investigate the relationship between surgeon volume and the risk of deep surgical site infection (DSSI) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of closed tibial plateau fracture. This was a further analysis of the prospectively collected data. Adult patients undergoing ORIF procedure for closed tibial plateau fracture between January 2016 and December 2019 were included. Surgeon volume was defined as the number of surgically treated tibial fractures in the preceding 12months and dichotomized on the basis of the optimal cut-off value determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The outcome was DSSI within oneyear post-operatively. Multiple multivariate logistic models were constructed for "drilling down" adjustment of confounders. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the robustness of outcome and identify the "optimal" subgroups. Among 742 patients, 20 (2.7%) had a DSSI and 17 experienced re-operations. The optimal cut-off value for case volume was nine, and the low-volume surgeon was independently associated with 2.9-fold (OR, 2.9; 95%CI, 1.1 to 7.5) increased risk of DSSI in the totally adjusted multivariate model. The sensitivity analyses restricted to patients with original BMI data or those operated within 14days after injury did not alter the outcomes (OR, 2.937, and 95%CI, 1.133 to 7.615; OR, 2.658, and 95%CI, 1.018 to 7.959, respectively). The subgroup analyses showed a trend to higher risk of DSSI for type I-IV fractures (OR, 4.6; 95%CI, 0.9 to 27.8) classified as Schatzker classification and substantially higher risk in patients with concurrent fractures (OR, 6.1; 95%CI, 1.0 to 36.5). The surgeon volume is independently associated with the rate of DSSI, and a number of ≥ nine cases/year are necessarily kept for reducing DSSIs; patients with concurrent fractures should be preferentially operated on by high-volume surgeons.

A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes from Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis and Open Reduction and Internal Fixation using Cellular Bone Allograft Augmentation

Category:Other; Ankle; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot; Midfoot/ForefootIntroduction/Purpose:Surgical arthrodesis of joints in the foot and ankle is common in patients who have failed nonoperative management for a variety of conditions. ViviGen is an allogeneic cellular bone matrix product that contains lineage-committed bone cells, and can be used as an alternative to autograft bone or other augments in order to aid in arthrodesis or to enhance bony healing in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) procedures. However, compared with autograft bone, ViviGen does not introduce potential for donor site morbidity. Due to the lack of studies examining outcomes following foot and ankle surgeries in which ViviGen is utilized, further investigation is required to determine its efficacy and safety for use in foot and ankle joint arthrodesis and skeletal fracture fixation.Methods:This study included 153 consecutive patients undergoing ankle, midfoot or hindfoot arthrodesis or ORIF procedures in which ViviGen was used as an augment. Pediatric patients and cases involving structural allografts or metal wedges were excluded. Patients were not excluded based on the amount of ViviGen used, type of instrumentation or implants used, or due to comorbidity. This series included revision as well as primary arthrodesis procedures and included various fixation types. Retrospective chart review was used to identify patient demographic factors and medical comorbidities, as well as to evaluate clinical and radiographic data to determine outcome.Results:135 patients were available for analysis at final evaluation. 113 patients underwent arthrodesis (mean age of 56.29 years, mean body mass index of 32.19). 22 patients underwent an ORIF procedure (mean age of 36.35 years, mean body mass index of 32.79). The fusion rate for the arthrodesis cohort was 97/113 (85.8%). Table 1 demonstrates the fusion rate stratified by region of the foot. Smokers had significantly lower rates of fusion compared to nonsmokers (p=0.01). There was not a statistically significant difference in the rate of fusion between primary and revision arthrodesis (p=0.8650). The rate of fusion was significantly lower in patients with Charcot foot in comparison to patients without Charcot foot (p=0.0076). The bony healing rate for the ORIF cohort was 19/22 (86.4%).Conclusion:This large case series of patients undergoing a wide variety of procedures about the ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot with ViviGen bone graft augmentation demonstrates satisfactory outcomes with regard to fusion rate and successful union, as well as minimal complications. To date, this is the largest case series in the literature of patients undergoing foot and ankle procedures with an allogenic cellular bone matrix product that contains lineage-committed bone cells. Our findings help to introduce ViviGen as a safe and efficacious alternative to other forms of augmentation for fusion and ORIF procedures about the foot and ankle.

The Influence of Opioid Use Disorder on Open Reduction and Internal Fixation following Ankle Fracture

Category:Ankle; OtherIntroduction/Purpose:Ankle fractures are common injuries that may require surgical treatment consisting of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Injuries associated with increased pain levels are also correlated with increased opioid use, which is also recognized as a risk factor for bone fracture. There is a paucity of literature evaluating the impact of patients with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) on postoperative complications following ORIF for ankle fracture. This study aims to investigate whether OUD patients are at greater odds of: 1) readmission rates, 2) emergency room visits, and 3) costs of care.Methods:Patients undergoing ORIF for ankle fracture with a 90-day history of OUD prior to the procedure were identified using national health insurance claims database. We selected patients that underwent surgical corrections as recorded by the following current procedural terminology (CPT) medical codes: 27792, 27814, 27822, 27823, 27766, 27829, and 27769. We matched cases with OUD to controls with a 1:4 of OUD to non-OUD controls. Variables that were matched between non-controls and controls included age, sex, Elixhauser- Comorbidity Index (ECI), in addition to comorbidities including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and tobacco usage. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds-ratios (OR) for outcomes of 90-day readmission rates and emergency room visits. Welch’s t-test was used to test for significance of outcomes of cost of care and ECI between the cohorts. A p-value less than 0.001 was statistically significant.Results:A total of 2,198 patients were included with (n= 485) and without (n = 1,698) OUD undergoing ORIF for ankle fracture (Table 1). OUD patients undergoing ORIF for ankle fractures were found to have a higher incidence and odds of 90-day readmission rates compared to controls (8.65 vs. 7.30%; OR: 1.20, 95%CI: 0.83 - 1.73, p=0.320), but failed to reach statistical significance. OUD patients were found to have a higher incidence and odds of emergency room visits compared to controls (3.50 vs. 0.64%; OR: 5.57, 95% CI: 2.59 - 11.97, p<0.0001). OUD patients also incurred significantly higher costs of care compared to controls ($5,921.59 vs. $5,128.22, p<0.0001).Conclusion:Patients with OUD have greater odds of 90-day hospital readmission rates, emergency room visits, and costs of care following ORIF procedures for ankle fracture. These outcomes are consistent with previous research which found increased costs associated with individuals diagnosed with OUD prior to undergoing other foot and ankle procedures. This study, establishes that patients with OUD place a significant, but preventable, financial burden on healthcare resources. The findings of this study highlight the role that foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons can play in reducing healthcare costs and improving patient outcomes by addressing OUD prior to the occurrence of injury.

A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes From Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis and Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Using Cellular Bone Allograft Augmentation.

ViviGen is an allogeneic cellular bone matrix product containing lineage-committed bone cells, and can be used as an alternative to autograft bone or other augments to aid in arthrodesis or to enhance bony healing in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) procedures. This study included 153 consecutive patients undergoing ankle, midfoot, or hindfoot arthrodesis or ORIF procedures from January 2017 to October 2018, in which an allogeneic cellular bone matrix product was used to aid in bony healing. Retrospective chart review identified patient demographic factors and medical comorbidities and evaluated clinical and radiographic data to determine fusion/union rate and complications. The overall fusion rate for the arthrodesis cohort was 97/113 (85.8%). The overall complication rate in this cohort was 22/113 (19.5%). Smokers had significantly lower rates of fusion compared with nonsmokers (P = .01). The observed bony healing rate for the ORIF cohort was 19/22 (86.4%), with a complication rate of 3/22 (13.6%). With satisfactory fusion rates and relatively few complications, our findings suggest that ViviGen is a safe and efficacious alternative to other forms of bone graft augmentation for fusion and ORIF procedures about the foot and ankle. Further study is needed to compare the efficacy of ViviGen with autograft bone and other augments. Level IV: Case series.

Risk factors for surgical site infections after open reduction and internal fixation of acetabulum fracture in the west of Iran

BackgroundStill, surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a significant clinical problem. We aim to investigate the Incidence and risk factors (RFs) for SSIs occurrence following the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabulum fracture. Materials and methodsAn observational cohort study conducted on 788 patients who underwent the ORIF procedures for acetabulum fracture between April 2012 and May 2019. The possible RFs associated with SSIs identified by univariate Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression models. Results512 (69%) males and 276 (31%) females included. SSIs occurred in 35 of 512 males (4.03%), and 18 of 276 females (4.80%). The overall incidence of SSIs was 6.7% (53/788). In a multivariate analysis, advance age (OR, 3.21 (1.82–5.58), 95% CI,P < 0.001), male sex (OR, 1.75 (1.12–4.69), 95% CI,P < 0.003), high BMI (OR, 2.67 (1.52–5.05), 95% CI,P < 0.005) current smoking (OR, 2.31 (0.87–4.98), 95% CI,P < 0.004), low socio-educational levels (OR, 3.16 (0.65–7.43),95% CI,P < 0.005), Hospitalization > 5 days (OR, 1.54 (0.87–4.67).95% CI,P < 0.003), Deputy Chief Surgeon level (OR, 2.36 (1.32–5.41),95% CI,P < 0.003), high energy injury (OR, 2.69 (1.12–5.84),95% CI,P = 0.002), open fracture (OR, 2.69 (1.12–5.84),95% CI,P < 0.001), associated fracture (OR, 1.48 (0.59–4.51),95% CI,P < 0.002), ISS score ≥ 15(OR, 079 (025–3.66),95% CI,P = 0.001), risk score ≥ 2 (OR, 2.62 (0.72–5.46),95% CI,P = 0.001) and ASA score ≥ 1 (OR, 0.56 (0.31–1.87).95% CI,P < 0.001) were variables associated with a significantly RFs for SSIs development after ORIF of acetabulum fracture. ConclusionMost SSIs can treat with antibiotics. Sometimes an additional operation or procedure may be required to manage the SSIs. Hence, prevention requires complete attention to RFs, to reduce the risk of SSI and improve the patient's defenses.

Therapeutic Effect of Resection, Prosthetic Replacement and Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for the Treatment of Mason Type III Radial Head Fracture

Aim of the Study: Mason type III radial head fractures are a source of concern due to the severe injury and poor recovery. At present, radial head resection, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and prosthetic replacement are three common treatment methods for these fractures. The clinical efficacy and postoperative complications are controversial, which makes it difficult for physicians to determine the most appropriate regimen. Herein, this present prospective, non-randomized, parallel-controlled study was conducted to compare the therapeutic effects and identify the most effective treatment method for Mason type III radial head fracture. Materials and Methods: We assessed patients with Mason type III radial head fracture treated with resection, prosthetic replacement, and ORIF to compare preoperative and postoperative pain condition, elbow joint function, curative effect, and complication rate. A visual analog scale was used to score pain. The elbow joint function was observed using the Broberg–Morrey elbow joint score. Results: No significant differences were found in patient demographics among the resection, prosthetic replacement, and ORIF groups. The prosthetic replacement and ORIF procedures were more complex and had higher technical requirements. Prosthetic replacement and ORIF enabled higher elbow joint scores and lower pain scores than resection. Excellent and good ratings were highest and complication rates were lowest in the prosthetic replacement group, followed by the ORIF group. Conclusion: Our results showed that prosthetic replacement is more effective than ORIF and radial head resection in relieving pain, functional recovery and reducing complications in the treatment of Mason type III radial head fractures.

Complications in type III open tibial shaft fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation.

Aim: To estimate rates of fracture-related infection (FRI) and nonunion and assess the healthcare burden associated with FRI among patients with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Type III open tibial shaft fractures (TSFs). Methods: Patients with type III TSF requiring ORIF were identified using MarketScan® Database. Healthcare utilization and total costs were compared using generalized linear models. Results: The rates of FRI and nonunion were 35.99 and 36.94%, respectively, at 365 days. Patients with FRI had a significantly higher rate of readmission, emergency room visit and total healthcare costs compared with patients without FRI. Conclusion: Patients with an ORIF procedure for Type III TSF have a high risk of FRI and nonunion and; FRI significantly increased the healthcare burden.

Anterior fracture dislocation of the proximal humerus

Anterior fracture dislocations are among the most severe forms of proximal humeral fractures. Because of potential devascularization of the humeral head, it is unclear whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) offers superior results to primary hemiarthroplasty (HAS) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We retrospectively compared functional outcomes, complications, and revision surgeries after ORIF, HSA, and RSA in 81 patients with anterior fracture dislocations. Functional results were assessed with the age- and gender-normalized Constant Score (nCS). Of 81 anterior fracture dislocations, 40 (49.4%) were treated by ORIF (mean age 61.5 ± 13.9 years, range 29–89), 19 (12.3%) by HSA (mean age 71.6 ± 10.1 years, range 53–85), and 22 (27.2%) by RSA (mean age 79.8 ± 10.8 years, range 58–91). Of 81 patients (75.8% women, mean age: 67.4 ± 12.5 years, range 29–91 years), the mean nCS after 3.4 ± 2.9 years of follow-up was 63.4 ± 10.3 after ORIF, 52.4 ± 12.9 after HSA, and 74.5 ± 11.1 after RSA (ANOVA, p = 0.001). The complication rate in ORIF procedures was 22.5% (secondary displacement n = 2, avascular necrosis n = 7), in HSA, 36.8% (tubercle dislocation n = 4, tubercle resorption n = 2, septic loosening n = 1), and RSA, 13.6% (acromial fracture n = 1, tubercle displacement n = 1, tubercle resorption, n = 1; p < 0.001). Avascular necrosis was observed in 17.5% of cases following a primary head-preserving treatment. Treatment of anterior fracture dislocations is demanding. Open anatomic reduction and internal fixation can lead to good and excellent functional outcomes in young patients with good bone quality and should be performed in these patients as soon as possible. Elderly and frail patients may profit from RSA as a primary treatment. HSA should be reserved for cases where anatomic reduction and stable fixation in patients <65 years has failed; however, functional outcomes are poor.

Tibial plateau fracture management: arthroscopically-assisted versus ORIF procedure – clinical and radiological comparison

IntroductionTibial plateau fractures are articular injuries that may influence final functional outcome of the knee. Although these fractures comprise only 1% of all fractures, the fracture pattern is usually complex and requires anatomical reduction and absolutely stable fixation to achieve satisfactory results. The development of knee osteoarthritis is a common late complication and it can be strongly influenced by additional, underestimated cartilage defects, and meniscal and ligament tears. Materials and methodsBetween January 2012 and February 2015, a total of 78 patients with tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker type I-III) were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: one group was treated with arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) and the other with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The final number of patients was 75; 40 in the ARIF group and 35 in the ORIF group. Radiography and computed tomography were used to assess fracture pattern. An immediate postoperative radiograph was performed, and then repeated at 6 weeks, and 3,6 and 12 months after surgery. Demographic data (age and sex), additional intraarticular injuries, hospital stay and complications were noted, and clinical and radiological Rasmunssen score at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery were evaluated. ResultsAdditional intraarticular lesions were found in 27 patients; 20 in the ARIF group and 7 in the ORIF group (p = 0.06). There was a statistically significant difference in average duration of hospital stay: 3.10 ± 0.63 days for the ARIF group and 5.51 ± 1.66 days for the ORIF group (p = 0.0001). All fractures healed within 3 months following surgery. The overall complication rate was 12%. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rate between the two groups (p = 0.63). Clinical and radiological scores were excellent in most patients in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in average clinical and radiological Rasmunssen scores between the two groups. ConclusionsBoth ARIF and ORIF can provide equally good results; however, ARIF seems to offer a more precise evaluation and treatment of associated intraarticular lesions and to reduce the duration of hospital stay.

Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures in the elderly: a systematic review of the results.

We performed a systematic review of the literature involving a number of databases to identify studies that included outcomes of surgical treatment of acetabular fractures in patients aged > 55 years. An initial search identified 1564 studies. After exclusion by two independent reviewers, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were case series and the mean Coleman Methodology score for methodological quality assessment was 43.7 (standard deviation 12.3). There were 354 patients with acetabular fractures. Pooled analysis revealed a mean age of 71.6 years (55 to 96) and a mean follow-up of 43 months (20 to 188). Complex fractures were reported in 70.1% of patients.Seven studies presented the results of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); in eight other studies a total hip arthroplasty (THA), alone or combined with different internal fixation techniques, was the chosen treatment. In the ORIF sub-group, conversion to THA was performed at a mean of 25.5 months with anatomical reduction in 11.6% and imperfect and poor reduction in 22.3%. In the THA sub-group, an acetabular ring or cage with a cemented acetabular component was used in four studies (52 patients) and a cementless acetabular component was implanted in five studies (78 patients). Six patients (4.9%) underwent revision at a mean of 39 months after the index procedure.The analysis of intra-operative and post-operative parameters showed a statistical difference between the two sub-groups with regards to the mean operating time (236 mins ORIF vs 178 mins THA), the mean blood loss (707 mL ORIF vs 974 mL THA) and the mean mortality rate at one year (22.6% ORIF vs 8.8% THA).Based on the current data available, acute THA (alone or in combination with internal fixation) may have a role in the treatment of older patients with complex acetabular fractures. Despite the wide heterogenecity of fracture types and patient co-morbidities, THA procedures were associated with lower rates of mortality and further surgery when compared with the ORIF procedures.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:97-103. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160036

Treatment and outcome prognosis of patients with high-energy transsyndesmotic ankle fracture dislocation\u2014the \u201cLogsplitter\u201d injury

BackgroundThis study aimed to retrospectively review the clinical efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for treatment of high-energy transsyndesmotic ankle fracture dislocation—the “Logsplitter” injury.MethodsBetween December 2006 and December 2014, 41 patients (29 males and 12 females; mean age, 41.46 ± 13.42 years) with Logsplitter injury were treated by ORIF procedure. Patients were grouped as typical injury (mainly vertical axial stress) and untypical injury (mainly rotational stress) according to the injury mechanism and the degree of the talus wedged into the distal tibiofibular joint.ResultsAfter the follow-up of 32.48 ± 24.18 weeks, average American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at final follow-up was 78.54 ± 10.66 and the excellent and good rate of 82.9%. Three patients in typical group developed nonunion, and other three cases had infection vs. none in untypical group (both P = 0.053). Burwell-Charnely scoring system revealed anatomic reduction of fracture was achieved in 22 cases, fair reduction in 16 cases, and poor in only 3 cases. Patients in untypical group had better fracture reduction (P = 0.015) and lower incidence rate of posttraumatic ankle arthritis (P = 0.042) than typical cases as well as the range of motion (P < 0.01).ConclusionsThe ORIF may be an optimal approach to treat Logsplitter injuries. Patients with untypical injury had better fracture reduction, range of motion, and low incidence rate of posttraumatic ankle arthritis than those typical ones, and the postoperative outcome was affected by the injury and treatment characteristics.

Hardware Removal Due to Infection after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: Trends and Predictors.

Little is known about trends and predictors of hardware related infection following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of extremity fractures, one of the major causes of failure following ORIF. The present study was designed and conducted to determine trends and predictors of infection-related hardware removal following ORIF of extremities using a nationally representative database. We used Nationwide Inpatient Sample data from 2002 to 2011 to identify cases of ORIF following upper and lower extremity fractures, as well as cases that underwent infection-related hardware removal following ORIF. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of infection-related hardware removal, controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities, hospital characteristics, site of fracture, and year. For all ORIF procedures, the highest rate of hardware removal related to infection was observed in tarsal fractures (5.56%), followed by tibial (3.65%) and carpal (3.37%) fractures. Hardware removal rates due to infection increased in all fractures except radial/ulnar fractures. Tarsal fractures(odds ratio (OR)=1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.09, P<0.001), tibial fractures (OR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06, P<0.001) and those patients with diabetes mellitus (OR=2.64, 95% CI: 2.46-2.84, P<0.001), liver disease (OR=2.04, 95% CI: 1.84- 2.26, P<0.001), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR=2.06, 95% CI: 1.88-2.25 P<0.001) were the main predictors of infection-related removals; females were less likely to undergo removal due to infection (OR= 0.61, 95% CI: 0.59-0.63 P<0.001). Hardware removal rates due to infection increased in all fractures except radial/ulnar fractures. Diabetes, liver disease, and rheumatoid arthritis were important predictors of infection-related hardware removal. The study identified some risk factors for hardwarerelated infection following ORIF, such as diabetes, liver disease, and rheumatoid arthritis, that should be studied further in an attempt to implement strategies to reduce rate of infection following ORIF.