ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy of a central venous catheter adhesive fixation device (CVC) to prevent associated complications. To establish the need for dressing changes, number of days’ catheterization and reasons for catheter removal in both study groups. To assess the degree of satisfaction of personnel with the adhesive system. MethodA, randomised, prospective and open pilot study, of parallel groups, with comparative evaluation between CVC fixation with suture and with an adhesive safety system. The study was performed in the Coronary Unit of the Universitari de Bellvitge Hospital, between April and November 2016. The population studied were patients with a CVC. The results were analysed using SPSS Statistics software. The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Results100 patients (47 adhesive system and 53 suture) were analysed. Both groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic variables, anticoagulation and days of catheterization. The frequency of complications in the adhesive system group was 21.3%, while in the suture group it was 47.2% (p=.01). The suture group had a higher frequency of local signs of infection (p=.006), catheter displacement (p=.005), and catheter-associated bacteraemia (p=.05). The use of adhesive fixation was associated with a lower requirement for dressing changes due to bleeding (p=.006). Ninety-six point seven percent of the staff recommended using the adhesive safety system. ConclusionsThe catheters fixed with adhesive systems had fewer infectious complications and less displacement.
Read full abstract