Open Distal Repair Research Articles

Can Open Distal Repair Be Safely Used in All Patients with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection?

The distal suture line during aortic dissection repair can be performed by a closed technique or by an open technique. This study presents a retrospective comparison of both methods regarding their postoperative outcomes. 120 patients who underwent surgery for acute aortic dissection type A were divided into two groups. In group A (n = 81), open distal anastomosis was performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion. In group B (n = 39), distal anastomosis was performed with the aorta cross-clamped under mildly hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Primary outcomes were operative mortality, neurologic morbidity, and long-term survival. Hospital mortality (17.3% for the open group vs. 12.8% for the closed group, p = 0.53), permanent neurologic dysfunction (8.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 1.0), and temporary neurologic dysfunction (31.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.298) were not significantly different between groups. No significant difference in actuarial 5- and 10-year survival was observed (88% vs. 86% and 53 vs. 73%, respectively, p = 0.396). After propensity-score adjustment, the technique of distal aortic repair was not found to be a predictor of the primary outcomes. We conclude that the open repair can be used in most if not all cases of surgical repair of type A acute aortic dissection.

Chronic Type I and Type III aortic dissections: a propensity analysis of outcomes after open distal repair.

To compare short-term outcomes, long-term survival and reinterventions in patients requiring surgery after chronic Type I and chronic primary Type III aortic dissections. Over an 11-year period, 466 patients underwent thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for chronic Type III (n = 239) and Type I (n = 227) aortic dissections. Short-term outcomes and reinterventions were evaluated by multivariable regression analysis for the entire group; propensity matching produced 169 pairs. Mortality was 6% (n = 28) in the overall cohort and 6.2% (n = 14) and 5.9% (n = 14) in those with chronic Type I and Type III aortic dissections, respectively. Overall stroke and persistent spinal cord deficit rates were 4.0% and 2.6%, respectively, in the Type I group and 1.3% and 3.8% in the Type III group. In the propensity-matched patients, analysis showed no neurological differences between the 2 groups, but respiratory failure was significantly more frequent in the chronic Type I group (30.2% vs 15.4%; P = 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified chronic Type I dissection as an independent risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio 1.612; 95% confidence interval 1.060-2.452; P = 0.026) and an association between chronic Type I dissection and stroke (odds ratio 4.013; 95% confidence interval 1.026-15.698; P = 0.046). Six-year survival was 74.4% ± 4.1% and 74.4% ± 4.6% in the chronic Type I and Type III groups, respectively (P = 0.87). Short- and long-term mortality and reintervention rates were comparable after open repair for chronic Type I and primary chronic Type III aortic dissections. Respiratory failure was more frequent in the chronic Type I aortic dissection group.

Open and closed distal anastomosis for acute type A aortic dissection repair.

The current consensus favours an open distal anastomosis for aortic dissection repair. A small number of experiences have compared early and long-term outcomes between closed and open distal anastomosis in the setting of acute aortic dissection. We reviewed our experience in 204 patients who underwent repair of spontaneous acute type A aortic dissection between January 2000 and December 2013. Open distal repair was performed in 109 patients, whereas 95 patients received a closed anastomosis. The clinical presentation, anatomical characteristics of aortic dissection, surgical techniques and the outcomes were analysed in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients (n = 100; open = 39, closed = 61) with Type 1 DeBakey dissection and a proximal intimal tear. Twenty-six preoperative and operative variables were studied to determine their impact on hospital mortality and postoperative neurological deficits. Imaging follow-up was available in 83 patients. A more extensive involvement of the aortic arch characterized the open repair group. No differences in terms of mortality, morbidity and survival rates were observed between the two groups of patients. Open repair with cerebral perfusion was associated with a better neurological outcome. Patients who underwent an open distal anastomosis showed a significant higher rate of complete thrombosis of the false lumen. An open repair does not increase the risk of early mortality and positively affect the evolution of the false lumen in distal unresected aortic segments. The use of cerebral perfusion reduces the risk of perioperative neurological injury.

Staged hybrid repair of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms secondary to chronic aortic dissection

Many patients with aortic dissection develop Crawford extent I or II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Because open repair is associated with a high morbidity and mortality, hybrid approaches to TAAA repair are emerging. In this study, we evaluated the midterm outcomes and aortic remodeling of a hybrid technique that combines proximal thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR), followed by staged distal open thoracoabdominal repair for patients with Crawford extent I or II TAAAs secondary to chronic aortic dissection. We identified 19 patients with Crawford extent I (n = 1) or extent II (n = 18) TAAAs secondary to chronic aortic dissection who underwent a staged hybrid repair from 2007 to 2014 at our institution. Nine patients had previous open ascending aortic surgery for type I aortic dissection. Stage 1 TEVAR was performed via percutaneous (n = 8), femoral cutdown (n = 8), or iliac exposure (n = 3). The left subclavian artery was covered in nine patients and revascularized in eight patients using carotid-subclavian bypass (n = 7) or laser fenestration (n = 1). Stage 2 open repair was performed a median of 18 weeks later with partial cardiopulmonary bypass via left femoral arterial and venous cannulation for visceral and lower body perfusion. The open thoracoabdominal graft was anastomosed proximally in an end to end fashion with the endograft. We then assessed surgical morbidity and mortality, midterm survival, and freedom from reintervention. Aortic remodeling was measured and change in maximum aortic and false lumen diameter at last follow-up (median, 3 years) from baseline was assessed. There were no deaths, strokes, or chronic renal failure in this cohort. After stage 1 TEVAR, three patients required repeat intervention for endoleak (type Ia, n = 1; type Ib, n = 1; type II, n = 1) before open repair. After stage 2 open repair, there was a single delayed permanent paralysis 2 weeks after discharge. At a median 3-year follow-up (range, 6 months-6.2 years), there were no deaths, neurologic events, endoleaks, or TAAA reinterventions. Complete false lumen thrombosis occurred in 100% of the patients, with maximum false lumen diameter decreasing from 34.3 ± 15.3 mm to 13.2 ± 12.0 mm (P < .01) and total aortic diameter decreasing from 60.2 ± 9.0 mm to 49.4 ± 9.6 mm (P < .01). Staged hybrid TAAA repair, using a combination of proximal TEVAR with open distal repair, can be performed using established endovascular skills and technology coupled with traditional open aortic surgical techniques, with low surgical morbidity and mortality. In the midterm, staged hybrid TAAA repair was associated favorable survival, aortic remodeling, and freedom from reintervention.