Open Colectomy Research Articles

Association of robotic surgery with early discharge, readmission, and complications in elective colectomy: an analysis of NSQIP data from 2012 to 2021.

Background Early discharge (ED) after colectomy has become a target outcome for multiple reasons, but the factors associated with ED are not well characterized. This study investigated the factors associated with ED and evaluated the impact of ED on overall outcome. Methods Data from ACS-NSQIP were used to identify patients who underwent non-emergent colectomy from 2012 to 2021. ED was defined as length of stay ≤ 2days. Unpaired t-tests, chi-square tests and adjusted multivariate logistic regression modeling were used to estimate associated factors for ED. Bounceback readmission was defined as readmission within 7days of discharge. Results In this cohort of 282,490 patients, 43,137 (15.3%) met the criteria for ED. Robotic colectomy (OR 14.35; 95% CI [13.63-15.12]) was more strongly associated with ED than any other patient characteristic, including laparoscopic colectomy (6.82 [6.51-7.14], ref open colectomy). ED vs. non-ED patients had lower rates of 30-day (5.84 vs. 10.37%, p < 0.01) and bounceback (3.56 vs. 5.75%, p < 0.01) readmissions, overall complications (5.65 vs. 18.63%, p < 0.01) and post-discharge complications (4.21 vs. 7.49%, p < 0.01). Conclusions Robotic surgery was the variable most strongly associated with ED, with greater odds of ED compared to both laparoscopic and open colectomy. Patients who had ED after robotic surgery had lower rates of complications and readmission compared to non-ED patients.

Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for locally advanced colon cancer in obese patients: a nationwide, multicenter, propensity score-based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes

Abstract Objective This study evaluated the short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy versus open surgery in obese patients (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2) with locally advanced colon cancer to ascertain the non-inferiority of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery. Methods In this large cohort study (UMIN-ID: UMIN000033529), we retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for pathological stage II–III colon cancer between 2009 and 2013. A comparative analysis was performed after propensity score matching between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. The primary endpoint was the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS). Results We identified 1575 eligible patients from 46 institutions. Each group comprised 526 propensity score-matched patients. Comparing the laparoscopic versus open surgery group, laparoscopic surgery was significantly associated with increased median operating time (225 vs. 192.5 min; P &amp;lt; .0001) and decreased median estimated blood loss (20 vs. 140 ml; P &amp;lt; .0001). Lymph node retrieval (20 vs. 19; P = 0.4392) and postoperative complications (4.6% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.4851) were similar, postoperative hospital stay was shorter (10 vs. 12 days; P &amp;lt; .0001), and the 3-year RFS rates were similar (82.8 vs. 81.2%). The hazard ratio (HR) for relapse-free survival for laparoscopic versus open surgery was 0.927 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.747–1.150, one-sided P for non-inferiority = .001), indicating that for obese patients with colon cancer, laparoscopic surgery was non-inferior to open surgery. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery in obese patients with colon cancer offers advantages in terms of short-term outcomes and no disadvantages in terms of long-term outcomes.

Does the pre-conversion platform matter? A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic converted to open colectomies

Does the pre-conversion platform matter? A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic converted to open colectomies

An artificial intelligence-designed predictive calculator of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy in colon cancer

Minimally invasive surgery is safe and effective in colorectal cancer. Conversion to open surgery may be associated with adverse effects on treatment outcomes. This study aimed to assess risk factors of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy for colon cancer and impact of conversion on short-term and survival outcomes. This case–control study included colon cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive colectomy from the National Cancer Database (2015–2019). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine independent predictors of conversion from laparoscopic and robotic colectomy to open surgery. 26,546 patients (mean age: 66.9 ± 13.1 years) were included. Laparoscopic and robotic colectomies were performed in 79.1% and 20.9% of patients, respectively, with a 10.6% conversion rate. Independent predictors of conversion were male sex (OR: 1.19, p = 0.014), left-sided cancer (OR: 1.35, p < 0.001), tumor size (OR: 1, p = 0.047), stage II (OR: 1.25, p = 0.007) and stage III (OR: 1.47, p < 0.001) disease, undifferentiated carcinomas (OR: 1.93, p = 0.002), subtotal (OR: 1.25, p = 0.011) and total (OR: 2.06, p < 0.001) colectomy, resection of contiguous organs (OR: 1.9, p < 0.001), and robotic colectomy (OR: 0.501, p < 0.001). Conversion was associated with higher 30- and 90-day mortality and unplanned readmission, longer hospital stay, and shorter overall survival (59.8 vs 65.3 months, p < 0.001). Male patients, patients with bulky, high-grade, advanced-stage, and left-sided colon cancers, and patients undergoing extended resections are at increased risk of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy. The robotic platform was associated with reduced odds of conversion. However, surgeons’ technical skills and criteria for conversion could not be assessed.

Have outcomes following colectomy in the United States improved over time?

BackgroundThere has been tremendous effort to improve quality following colorectal surgery, including the proliferation of minimally invasive techniques, enhanced recovery protocols, and surgical site infection prevention bundles. While these programs have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes at the institutional level, it is unclear whether similar benefits are present on a national scale. MethodsAmerican College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Targeted Colectomy data from 2012 to 2020 were used to identify patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open partial colectomy (CPT 44140, 44204) or low anterior resection (CPT 44145, 44207). Chronological cohorts as well as annual trends in 30-day postoperative outcomes including surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, and length of stay were assessed using both univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Results261,301 patients, 135,876 (52 ​%) female, with a median age of 62 (IQR 53–72) were included. Across all years, MIS partial colectomy was the most common procedure (37 ​%), followed by MIS low anterior resection (27 ​%), open partial colectomy (24 ​%), and open low anterior resection (12 ​%). MIS increased from 59 ​% in 2012–2014 to 66 ​% in 2018–2020 (p ​< ​0.001). During this same period, postoperative length of stay decreased from a median of 5 days (IQR 4–7) in 2012–2014 to 4 days (IQR 3–6) in 2018–2020 (p ​< ​0.001). Superficial surgical site infections decreased from 5.5 ​% in 2012–2014 to 2.9 ​% in 2018–2020 (p ​< ​0.001). Deep surgical site infections similarly decreased from 1.1 ​% to 0.4 ​% between these periods (p ​< ​0.001). Pulmonary embolism also decreased from 0.6 ​% to 0.5 ​% between periods (p ​= ​0.02). 30-day mortality was unchanged at 1.7 ​% between 2012-2014 and 2018–2020 (p ​= ​0.40). After adjustment for ACS NSQIP estimated probability of morbidity and mortality, undergoing a colectomy in 2020 compared to 2012 was associated with a 14 ​% decrease in postoperative length of stay (p ​< ​0.001). ConclusionsBetween 2012 and 2020, significant improvements in postoperative outcomes after colectomy were observed in the United States. These results support the positive impact that the widespread adoption of quality improvement initiatives is having on colorectal patient care nationally.

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Emergent Colectomy for Diverticulitis.

The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the acute management of diverticulitis remains controversial. Using a national cohort, we examined the relationship between operative approaches with acute clinical and financial outcomes. Adults undergoing emergent colectomy for diverticulitis were tabulated from the 2015-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Regression models were developed to analyze the association between open and MIS approaches with major adverse events (MAE), as well as secondary endpoints. A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between open and MIS requiring conversion to open (CTO). Of 9194 patients, 1580 (17.3%) underwent MIS colectomy. The proportion of MIS resection increased from 15.1% in 2015 to 19.1% in 2020 (nptrend<.001). Compared to Open, MIS patients were younger, equally likely to be female, had a lower proportion of patients with ASA class ≥3, and a higher BMI. Preoperatively, MIS patients were less frequently diagnosed with sepsis. Following adjustment with open as reference, MIS approach had reduced odds of MAE (AOR .56), ostomy creation (AOR .12), shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS; β -1.63), and a lower likelihood of nonhome discharge (AOR .45, all P < .001). Additionally, CTO was linked to decreased likelihood of MAE (AOR .78, P = .01), ostomy creation (AOR .02, P < .001), comparable LOS (β -.46, P = .41), and reduced odds of nonhome discharge (AOR .58, P < .001), relative to open. Compared to planned open colectomy, MIS resection was associated with improved clinical and financial outcomes, even in cases of CTO. Our findings suggest that whenever possible, MIS should be attempted first in emergent colectomy for diverticulitis. Nevertheless, future prospective studies are likely needed to further elucidate specific patient and clinical factors.

Effect of screening colonoscopy frequency on colorectal cancer mortality in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a common malignant tumor in China, and its incidence in the elderly is increasing annually. Inflammatory bowel disease is a group of chronic non-specific intestinal inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. To assess the effect of screening colonoscopy frequency on colorectal cancer mortality. We included the clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic colectomy or open colectomy at our Gastrointestinal Department between January 2019 and December 2022. Surgical indicators, oncological indicators, and survival rates were compared between the groups. The results of 104 patients who met the above criteria were extracted from the database (laparoscopic colectomy group = 63, open colectomy group = 41), and there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data or follow-up time between the two groups. Intraoperative blood loss, time to first ambulation, and time to first fluid intake were significantly lower in the laparoscopic colectomy group than in the open colectomy group. The differences in overall mortality, tumor-related mortality, and recurrence rates between the two groups were not statistically significant, and survival analysis showed that the differences in the cumulative overall survival, tumor-related survival, and cumulative recurrence-free rates between the two groups were not statistically significant. In elderly patients with colorectal cancer, laparoscopic colectomy has better short-term outcomes than open colectomy, and laparoscopic colectomy has superior long-term survival outcomes compared with open colectomy.

A220 MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS UNDERGOING COLECTOMY (2016-2020)

Abstract Background Despite an expanding armamentarium of medical treatment options, the 10-year cumulative risk of colectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) remains 5-10%. Surgery for UC is associated with a substantial burden of mortality. A previous meta-analysis of population-based studies found that postoperative mortality was 0.7% of patients undergoing elective surgery and 5.3% of patients undergoing emergent colectomy. Aims Given improvements in managing acutely ill patients with UC, we aimed to evaluate contemporary rates of postoperative mortality following colectomy. Methods We analyzed data in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 2016-2020. The NIS is an all-payer administrative health database, capturing information from ampersand:003E7 million inpatient admissions at ampersand:003E1000 hospitals across the United States annually. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex stratified survey design. Adult patients (≥18 yrs) with a primary diagnosis of UC undergoing colectomy were identified with ICD-10 coding. Rates of in-hospital postoperative mortality were calculated, and predictors of mortality were evaluated in survey-adjusted logistic regression. Results A total of 8570 hospitalizations for patients with UC undergoing colectomy were included. Mean age at colectomy was 44.5 years and 47% of patients were female. Emergency colectomy was performed in 38.2% [95% CI: 35.9%, 40.7%] of patients, and was attempted laparoscopically in 55.9% [53.1%, 58.7%]. Overall mortality from 2016-2020 was 1.2% [0.8%, 1.9%], but was 0.2% [0.1%, 0.8%] for elective surgery and 2.9% [1.9%, 4.5%] for emergent surgery. Stratified rates of mortality are summarized in Table 1. In multivariable analysis, age was not an independent predictor of mortality but laparoscopic surgery (adjusted odds ratio 0.24 [0.06-0.98], p=0.047) and elective resection (aOR 0.16 [0.04-0.68], p=0.01) were associated with a lower risk of postoperative death. Conclusions Approximately 1 in 100 patients undergoing colectomy for UC will die postoperatively. This risk is highest in comorbid patients undergoing open laparotomy or emergency colectomy. The risk of mortality in both emergent and elective settings is lower than previously reported. Table 1. Stratified risks of mortality after colectomy for ulcerative colitis Funding Agencies None

Maximizing Readmission Reduction in Colon Cancer Patients

IntroductionMultiple studies have identified risk factors for readmission in colon cancer patients. We need to determine which risk factors, when modified, produce the greatest decrease in readmission for patients so that limited resources can be used most effectively by implementing targeted evidence-based performance improvements. We determined the potential impact of various modifiable risk factors on reducing 30-d readmission in colon cancer patients. MethodsWe used a cohort design with the 2012–2020 American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to track colon cancer patients for 30 d following surgery. Colon cancer patients who received colectomies and were discharged alive were included. Readmission (to the same or another hospital) for any reason within 30 d of the resection was the outcome measure. Modifiable risk factors were the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open colectomy, mechanical bowel preparation, preoperative antibiotic use, functional status, smoking, complications (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, infections, anastomotic leakage, prolonged postoperative ileus, extensive blood loss, and sepsis), serum albumin, and hematocrit. Results111,691 patients with colon cancer were included in the analysis. About half of the patients were male, most were aged 75 or older, and were discharged home. Overall, 11,138 patients (10.0%) were readmitted within 30 d of surgery. In adjusted analysis, the reduction in readmission would be largest by preventing both prolonged ileus and by switching open colectomies to MIS (28.0% relative reduction) followed by preventing anastomotic leaks (6.2% relative reduction). Improving other modifiable risk factors would have a more limited impact. ConclusionsThe focus of readmission reduction should be on preventing prolonged ileus, increasing the use of MIS, and preventing anastomotic leaks.

Increasing Adoption of Laparoscopy in Urgent and Emergent Colectomies for Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis

IntroductionWhile minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches are commonly utilized in the elective surgical setting for pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC), their role in urgent and emergent disease is less clear. We aim to assess trends in the surgical approaches for pediatric UC patients requiring urgent and emergent colectomies and their associated outcomes. MethodsRetrospective review of 81 pediatric UC patients identified in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric who underwent urgent or emergent colectomy (2012-2019). Trends in approach were assessed using linear regression. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were stratified by approach and compared using standard univariate statistics. Multivariable analysis was used to model the influence of covariates on postoperative length of stay. ResultsThe proportion of MIS cases increased by 5.53% per year (P = 0.01) over the study interval. Sixty-three patients (77.8%) received MIS resections and 18 patients (22.2%) received open resections. Patients undergoing open colectomies were younger and had a higher proportion of preoperative conditions, most notably preoperative sepsis (27.8% versus 4.8%, P = 0.01), and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists [III-IV] classification (83.3% versus 58.8%, P = 0.004). Mean operative time was comparable (open, 173.6 versus MIS, 206.1 min). In the univariate analysis, open approach was associated with increased postoperative length of stay (13.1 versus 7.2 d, P = 0.002). However, after adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference. ConclusionsThere has been a steady increase in the adoption of laparoscopy in urgent and emergent colectomy for pediatric UC. Short-term outcomes between approaches appear comparable.

The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided, Continuous, Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Perioperative Pain Management of Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective Trial

Open and laparoscopic colorectal surgeries, while essential in the management of various colorectal pathologies, are associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective perioperative pain management strategies remain an anesthesiologic challenge. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB), a novel peripheral nerve block, has gained attention for its potential in providing analgesia for a wide variety of surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous, bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB in perioperative pain management of patients undergoing colectomy. This prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial included 40 adult patients scheduled for elective open or laparoscopic colectomy. Patients undergoing open colectomy as well as patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were randomly allocated into two groups: the ESPB group (n = 20) and the control group (n = 20). All patients received preoperatively ultrasound-guided, bilateral ESPB with placement of catheters for continuous infusion. Patients in the ESPB group received 0.375% ropivacaine, while patients in the control group received sham blocks. All patients received standardized general anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia. Pain scores, perioperative opioid consumption, and perioperative outcomes were assessed. Patients in the ESPB group required significantly less intraoperative (p &lt; 0.001 for open colectomies, p = 0.002 for laparoscopic colectomies) and postoperative opioids (p &lt; 0.001 for open colectomies, p = 0.002 for laparoscopic colectomies) and had higher quality of recovery scores on the third postoperative day (p = 0.002 for open and laparoscopic colectomies). Patients in the ESPB group did not exhibit lower postoperative pain scores compared to those in the control group (p &gt; 0.05 at various time points), while patients in both groups reported comparable satisfaction scores with their perioperative pain management (p = 0.061 for open colectomies, and p = 0.078 in laparoscopic colectomies). No complications were reported. ESPB is a novel and effective strategy in reducing perioperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing colectomy. This technique, as part of a multimodal analgesic plan and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, can be proven valuable in improving the comfort and satisfaction of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Outcomes in Diverticular Disease Undergoing Elective Colectomy—A Retrospective Cohort Study from the ACS-NSQIP Database

Recommendations for elective colectomies after recovery from uncomplicated acute diverticulitis should be individualized. The kinds of associated risk factors that should be considered for this approach remain undetermined. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative outcomes in patients with diverticular disease after receiving an elective colectomy. This is a retrospective study using the multi-institutional, nationally validated database of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). The patients who were diagnosed with diverticular disease and received an elective colectomy were included in our risk factor analyses. Postoperative mortality, morbidity, and overall complications were measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to demonstrate the risk factors. We analyzed 30,468 patients with diverticular disease, 67% of whom received an elective colectomy. The rate of 30-day mortality was 0.2%, and superficial surgical site infection was the most common postoperative morbidity (7.2%) in the elective colectomies. The independent risk factors associated with overall complications were age ≥ 75, BMI ≥ 30, smoking status, dyspnea, hypertension, current kidney dialysis, chronic steroid use, ASA III, and open colectomy. In laparoscopic colectomy, 67.5% of the elective colectomies, the associated risk factors associated with overall complications still included age ≥ 75, smoking, hypertension, chronic steroid use, and ASA III. Identification of patient-specific risk factors may inform the decision-making process for elective colectomy and reduce the postoperative complications after mitigation of those risk factors.

Early Discharge after Uncomplicated Elective Colectomy and Risk of Postdischarge Complication.

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing uncomplicated elective colectomy using the NSQIP database from January 2012 to December 2019. A colectomy is deemed uncomplicated if there are no complications reported during the hospitalization. The objective of this study was to examine the association between discharge timing and postdischarge complications in patients who undergo uncomplicated elective colectomy. Patients were stratified into an early discharge group if their length of postoperative hospitalization was ≤3 days for laparoscopic or robotic approaches, or ≤5 days for the open approach, and otherwise into delayed discharge groups. The association between early discharge and any postdischarge complication was examined using unadjusted logistic regression after propensity score matching between early and delayed discharge groups. Of the 113,940 patients included, 77,979, 15,877, and 20,084 patients underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic, robotic, and open colectomy, respectively. After propensity score matching, the odds of a postdischarge complication were lower for the early discharge group in laparoscopic (odds ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.79) and robotic (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.76) approaches, and not different in the open approach (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the risk of return to the operating room for all surgical approaches. Early discharge after uncomplicated colectomy appears to be safe and is associated with lower odds of postdischarge complications in minimally invasive approaches. Our findings suggest that surgical teams practice sound clinical judgments on selecting patients who benefit from early discharge.

Comparison of post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic and open right colectomy for colon cancer: A 4-year single centre experience

Background: Laparoscopic right colectomy (LRHC) is a procedure which has been getting more popular compared to traditional open right colectomy (ORHC) over the last three decades. This study compares the post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic and open right colectomy for colon cancer.&#x0D; Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study of right colectomy at a single institution from January 2018 to December 2021. The factors that were studied included postoperative HDU admission, the incidence of post-operative ileus (POI) and the length of hospital stay.&#x0D; Results: During the study period, 161 patients underwent right hemicolectomy. Sixty-seven (42%) underwent LRHC, 73 (45%) ORHC, and 21 (13%) laparoscopic converted to open procedure. The overall incidence of POI was 56 (35%), 14 (21%) among the LRHC and 28 (38%) among the ORHC group (p=0.024). The length of hospital stay was 7.1 (±4.8) days after the laparoscopic procedure compared to 8.7 (±4.4) in the open group (p=0.048). Forty-two patients out of 161 (26%) needed post-operative HDU admissions; out of these 11 (16%) were in the laparoscopic group and 29 (40%) among the open group (p=0.023).&#x0D; Conclusion: Post-operative recovery was significantly quicker among the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy group incomparison to the open right hemicolectomy group.

A comparison of open or laparoscopic colectomy outcomes for the management of ischemic colitis using the ACS-NSQIP database

Ischemic colitis is a common manifestation of intestinal ischemia and is potentially a surgical emergency. Although such surgical emergencies were historically approached via open exploration, it is uncertain if there is a role for minimally invasive techniques. This study compares open vs laparoscopic colectomy techniques in the management of ischemic colitis. Using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, patients with ischemic colitis undergoing colectomy from 2005 to 2019 were compared. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day mortality. Additional outcomes of interest were procedure related readmission, procedure related reoperation, length of stay, surgical site infections (SSI), septic shock, and other complications. Outcomes of interest were compared using multivariate logistic regression. 7,928 patients had ischemic colitis with 7,209 undergoing open colectomy and 719 undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. The mortality rate was significantly lower using a laparoscopic approach compared to open (6.4% vs 26%, p=<0.001) and associated with a lower odd of mortality (OR 0.58; 95% CI [0.35, 0.95]). Procedure related reoperation was lower in the laparoscopic group (6.5% vs 11%, p<0.001), but multivariate analysis was not significant (OR 0.65; 95% CI [0.43,1]). Readmission rates were not statistically different (12% vs 10%, p = 0.2). Postoperative length of stay (7 vs 12 days, p=<0.001), septic shock (6.7% vs 27%, p=<0.001), and organ space SSI (3.2% vs 6.9%, p=<0.001) were significantly decreased using a laparoscopic approach. 30-day postoperative mortality was significantly lower using a laparoscopic. Patients that had a laparoscopic colectomy had shorter hospital stays. While patients that underwent laparoscopic procedures tended to be less sick, multivariate analysis showed decreased rates of sepsis and surgical site infections compared to open colectomies when correcting for these factors. Laparoscopic colectomy may be a better surgical approach for patients with ischemic colitis compared to open colectomy.

Minimally invasive colectomies can be performed with similar outcomes to open counterparts for colorectal cancer emergencies: a propensity score matching analysis utilizing ACS-NSQIP.

The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the setting of colorectal cancer emergencies have been debated. We sought to compare postoperative outcomes of MIS with open techniques in the setting of colorectal cancer emergencies from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP)database. We included patients undergoing colectomy for colorectal cancer emergency between 2012 and 2019 "2012-2019" from the ACS-NSQIP dataset. We compared short-term morbidity, mortality, short-term oncological outcomes, and secondary outcomes for MIS vs open colectomies using propensity score matching. We then evaluated the trends of MIS versus open colectomies using linear regression analysis. We examined a total of 5544 patients (openn = 4070; MISn = 1474) and included 1352 patients for our postoperative outcome analyses after propensity score matching 1:1 (open n = 676; MIS n = 676). Within the matched cohort, mortality was significantly higher in the open group (open 6.95% vs MIS 3.99%, OR 1.8, p = 0.023). Anastomotic leak rates were comparable betweenthe two groups (open 4.46% vs MIS 4.02%, OR 1.12, p = 0.787). Pulmonary complications were significantly higher after open surgery (open 10.06% vs MIS 4.73%, OR 2.25, p < 0.001). Rates of ileus were significantly higher amongst open patients (open 29.08% vs MIS 19.94%, p < 0.001). Patients stayed on average 1day longer in the hospital after open surgery (p < 0.001).Rates of MIS for early tumors (N0 and T1/T2,n = 289) did notsignificantly change over7years(p = 0.597,rate = -0.065%/year); however, utilization of MIS for late tumors (N1 or T3/T4,n = 4359) increased by 2.06% per year (p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that MIS was associated with superior postoperative outcomes compared to open surgery without compromising oncological outcomes in patients undergoing emergency colectomy for colon cancer. Within the matched cohort, MIS was associated with lower rates of mortality, pulmonary complications, ileus, and shorter postoperative length of stay.

SP8.5 Emergency laparoscopic and open right hemicolectomy for right colonic malignancy: A retrospective comparative single centre study

Abstract Aim Minimally invasive surgery has gained wide acceptance in general surgery and is being increasingly used to treat colon cancers. However, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic against open emergency colectomies. This study aims to compare the clinical and pathological outcomes for laparoscopic and open right colectomy in the emergency setting. Methods This single-centre study involved a total of 201 patients who underwent emergency laparoscopic and/or open right hemicolectomy for right colonic malignancy between 2009 and 2019. Results A total of 201 right colectomies were performed. Among these procedures, 84 were operated laparoscopically and 117 with an open midline laparotomy. In the laparoscopic group, 13 were converted to open procedures. Patient demographics were similar across both groups with regard to age, sex, BMI, ASA grade, and tumour stage. Patients in the laparoscopic group had significantly shorter hospital stays [Median = 8 vs. 13 days], higher number of lymph nodes harvested [Median = 22 vs 18]. Postoperative ileus was less common in the open group than in the laparoscopic group [9(7.7%) vs 7(8.3%), P= 1.000]. There was no significant difference in major complications, anastomotic leak, and mortality. Median 5-year DFS for the laparoscopic group was 9.9 months in comparison to 9.7 months. Median OS for the laparoscopic group was 15.6 months compared to 12.3 months in the open group. Conclusions Emergency laparoscopic right hemicolectomy seems to be safe with equivalent oncological outcomes to open surgery. Randomized control trials are required to further investigate the role of laparoscopy in emergency surgery for right colon cancers.

Intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis after minimally invasive right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

As part of the wide adoption of minimally invasive surgery, intracorporeal anastomosis is becoming increasingly common. The benefits of minimally invasive versus open right colectomy are well known although the additional benefits of an intracorporeal anastomosis, performed laparoscopically or robotically, are unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the current literature comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in the setting of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted right colectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA and AMSTAR methods. Studies included were randomized controlled trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies, between January 12010 and July 12021, comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis with laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Four groups were identified: laparoscopic extracorporeal anastomosis (L-ECA), laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis (L-ICA), robotic extracorporeal anastomosis (R-ECA), and robotic intracorporeal anastomosis (R-ICA). Operative time, rate of conversion to an open procedure, surgical site infection, reoperation within 30days, postoperative complications within 30days, and length of hospital stay were assessed. Twenty-one retrospective cohort studies were included in the final analysis. R-ICA and R-ECA had comparable operative times, but a robotic approach required more time than laparoscopic (68min longer, p < 0.00001). Conversion to open surgery was 55% less likely in the R-ICA group vs. L-ICA, and up to 94% less likely in the R-ICA group in comparison to the R-ECA group. Length of hospital stay was shorter for R-ICA by a half day vs. R-ECA, and up to 1day less vs. L-ECA. There were no differences in postoperative complications, reoperations, or surgical site infections, regardless of approach. However, the included studies all had high risks of bias due to confounding variables and patient selection. Robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis was associated with shorter length of hospitalization and decreased rate of conversion to open surgery, compared to either laparoscopic or extracorporeal robotic approaches. Prospective studies are needed to better understand the true impact of robotic approach and intracorporeal anastomosis in right colectomy.

Return to intended oncologic therapy after colectomy for stage III colon adenocarcinoma: Does surgical approach matter?

Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) is an important paradigm for surgically resected cancers requiring multimodal treatment. Benefits of minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) may allow earlier initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and have associated survival benefits. We sought to determine if operative approach affects RIOT timing in resected stage III colon cancer. NCDB identified pathological stage III colon adenocarcinoma patients who underwent resection and received ACT. Propensity score matching and kernel density estimation compared operative approaches and conversion impact on intervals to RIOT. A total of 15,132 open colectomies (OC) versus 14,107 MIC were included. MIC patients had two-days shorter median length of stay (LOS) (4 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001), one-week shorter median time to RIOT (6 vs. 7 weeks; p = 0.015) comparing 12,867 matched pairs. There was no difference in time interval to RIOT between the LC versus RC, converted MIC vs. OC groups. MIC was a favourable predictor of earlier RIOT (HR 1.14 [1.07-1.22]; p < 0.001). MIC in stage III colon cancer is associated with a shorter time to RIOT when compared to OC. Since timely initiation of ACT may influence cancer outcome, MIC may be oncologically preferable. Prospective studies are needed to assess RIOT and survival outcomes in stage III colon cancer.

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of the Procedure-specific Risks of Thrombosis and Bleeding in General Abdominal, Colorectal, Upper Gastrointestinal, and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery.

To provide procedure-specific estimates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding after abdominal surgery. The use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis represents a trade-off that depends on VTE and bleeding risks that vary between procedures; their magnitude remains uncertain. We identified observational studies reporting procedure-specific risks of symptomatic VTE or major bleeding after abdominal surgery, adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up, and estimated cumulative incidence at 4 weeks postsurgery, stratified by VTE risk groups, and rated evidence certainty. After eligibility screening, 285 studies (8,048,635 patients) reporting on 40 general abdominal, 36 colorectal, 15 upper gastrointestinal, and 24 hepatopancreatobiliary surgery procedures proved eligible. Evidence certainty proved generally moderate or low for VTE and low or very low for bleeding requiring reintervention. The risk of VTE varied substantially among procedures: in general abdominal surgery from a median of <0.1% in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to a median of 3.7% in open small bowel resection, in colorectal from 0.3% in minimally invasive sigmoid colectomy to 10.0% in emergency open total proctocolectomy, and in upper gastrointestinal/hepatopancreatobiliary from 0.2% in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to 6.8% in open distal pancreatectomy for cancer. VTE thromboprophylaxis provides net benefit through VTE reduction with a small increase in bleeding in some procedures (eg, open colectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy), whereas the opposite is true in others (eg, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and elective groin hernia repairs). In many procedures, thromboembolism and bleeding risks are similar, and decisions depend on individual risk prediction and values and preferences regarding VTE and bleeding.