Aortic Repair Research Articles

Right mini-thoracotomy for concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft

Background Full sternotomy is the standard approach for combined surgery. Evidence of the minimally invasive approach’s advantages for aortic and mitral valve surgery has been reported. Our aim was to report our experience with minithoracotomy for elective patients presenting with aortic valve stenosis associated with right coronary artery disease. Material and methods Between January 2016 and August 2021, 17 patients underwent concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass grafting by right anterior thoracotomy. Results The mean age was 73.3 years and the mean EuroSCORE 2 was 2.07 ± 1.24. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 148 ± 29 min and 111 ± 20 min. Thirteen patients (76.0%) had femoral cannulation. Nine saphenous veins (53%), seven right internal thoracic arteries (41%), and one radial artery (6%) were used as a graft. Twelve patients benefited from ultrasonic flow measurements to control the graft. The mean flow rate was 47 ± 39 ml/min, and the mean pulsatility index was 2.4 ± 1.2. The mean postoperative transvalvular gradient was 10.9 ± 4 mmHg. Two patients presented with Grade 1 aortic insufficiency (12%). There was no 30-day mortality. Conclusions Combined aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass grafting through right anterior thoracotomy is reliable and reproducible in selected patients.

In situ needle fenestration for aortic arch conditions during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

BackgroundTo evaluate the clinical outcomes and the validity of the in situ needle fenestration (ISNF) technique during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for patients with aortic arch conditions.MethodsA total of 115 patients with aortic arch conditions treated with ISNF during TEVAR between January 2018 and December 2021 were incorporated.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 62.0 years, and 10.4% (12/115) were female. The median follow-up time was 31.0 months. A total of 175 supra-arch branches were reconstructed. A single branch was fenestrated in 80 patients, while the left subclavian artery (LSA) and left common carotid artery (LCCA) were fenestrated simultaneously in 11 patients, and all supra-arch branches were fenestrated in 24 patients. The rate of technical success was 100%, 30-day mortality was 3.5% (4/115), overall mortality was 8.7% (10/115), and aortic-related mortality was 2.6% (3/115). Aortic-related reintervention was required in 7.8% (9/115) of patients. Among the major postoperative complications, four patients developed retrograde type A dissection requiring emergent open surgery, three patients had cerebrovascular accidents, and one patient had an endoleak. No occlusions or stenoses of the main or branch aortic stents were observed.ConclusionsThe mid-term results of the ISNF technique during TEVAR for aortic arch conditions were within the acceptable range; however, further follow-up results are needed and long-term stability and durability needs to be assessed. Related fenestration devices also require further development.

Diagnostic Value of Maximal Systolic Acceleration Measurements in the Follow-up of Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair: Illustration of a Concept

Purpose: After complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR), long-term surveillance is advocated to monitor for potential (stent-related) complications. Although various imaging modalities are used, computed tomography angiography remains the standard in current clinical practice worldwide. However, radiopaque markers can cause metal artifacts and scattering, hampering assessment of patency of side branches. The maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) is a relatively new duplex ultrasound (DUS) parameter measured distal to a stenosis, avoiding in-stent assessment and scattering. The aim of this article is to illustrate the potential diagnostic utility of the ACCmax after cEVAR and visceral artery stenting in general. Technique: The ACCmax is measured at the maximal slope of the upstroke during the systolic phase in arterial flow. By manually connecting 2 points, a tangent line is created in which the maximal acceleration is automatically calculated and expressed in m/s2. A higher value reflects better arterial perfusion proximal to its measurement point. One measurement of a visceral artery takes about 5 minutes. Conclusion: ACCmax measurements can be a useful addition during DUS follow-up after cEVAR or visceral artery stenting, possibly decreasing radiation exposure, nephrotoxicity, and health care costs. Clinical Impact Long-term surveillance after complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR) is necessary to monitor for potential (stent-related) complications. Although CTA is the most common modality for imaging, metal artifacts and scattering can hamper the assessment of stent patency. The maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax) is a duplex ultrasound based parameter that reflects arterial perfusion proximal to its measurement point. Due to its noninvasive nature, it can be a useful addition during follow-up after cEVAR or visceral artery stenting, possibly decreasing radiation exposure, nephrotoxicity and health care costs as well.

Case Report: Increase in wall shear stress in a narrowed true lumen after type A aortic dissection repair analyzed by computed fluid dynamics

Case Report: Increase in wall shear stress in a narrowed true lumen after type A aortic dissection repair analyzed by computed fluid dynamics

Adequacy of Anesthesia Guidance for Combined General/Epidural Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair; Preliminary Report on Hemodynamic Stability and Pain Perception

Adequacy of Anesthesia Guidance for Combined General/Epidural Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair; Preliminary Report on Hemodynamic Stability and Pain Perception

Modified fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair with short bridging stent to treat complex aortic dissection

Modified fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair with short bridging stent to treat complex aortic dissection

Polytetrafluoroethylene Felt Inlay Neomedia and Tissue Glue Do Not Prevent Reoperation in Type A Aortic Dissection

Background/Objectives: Type A aortic dissection repair using Polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) felt inlay and tissue glue has been proposed as a treatment modality. It remains unclear, if this method performs superiorly to tissue glue only. Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2015, 139 patients underwent surgical repair for type A aortic dissection, and 48 patients were excluded (n = 29 after receiving a composite graft, n = 18 in which no tissue glue was used, and n = 1 due to missing data). In the remaining patients, proximal aortic repair was performed either using PTFE felt inlay and tissue glue or tissue glue only. We analyzed the need for repeated surgery on the aorta during follow-up as a primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality at follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the distribution of measured baseline covariates. Results: Sixty-six patients (73%) were treated with a tissue-glue-only approach—the Control Group. Twenty-five patients (27%) underwent proximal PTFE felt inlay and tissue glue—the Intervention Group. In the Intervention Group, 40% (n = 10) underwent reoperation due to re-dissection or pseudoaneurysm vs. 12% (n = 8) in the Control Group. The felt inlay increased the hazard of re-operation by 8.38 (1.63 to 43.0) after IPTW with death modeled as competing risk. Conclusions: Reoperation due to aortic complications was 10 times higher in patients treated with a combination of gluing and PTFE felt inlay vs. gluing only. These results are potentially caused by an interaction of PTFE, tissue glue, and aortic tissue.

Comparison of the effects of femoral and axillary artery cannulation on ischemic cerebral injury in acute type A aortic dissection surgery: A retrospective study

Background: Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring emergency surgical intervention. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of femoral and axillary arterial cannulation techniques on ischemic neurological damage and mortality.Materials and Method: A total of 60 patients who underwent emergency surgery for ATAAD between 2016 and 2021 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the arterial cannulation technique: Group A (axillary cannulation) and Group F (femoral cannulation). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was incidence of ischemic cerebral injury and secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and postoperative complications.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of ischemic cerebral injury (p=0.13). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups (p= 0.27). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the cannulation type was a risk factor for ischemic cerebral injury development (OR [95% CI]; 119.034 [1.612–8791.314], p=0.029).Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the type of cannulation may be a risk factor for the development of ischemic cerebral injury. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal arterial cannulation technique for improving outcomes in ATAAD surgery.

Local Morphologic and Hemodynamic Analyses for the Prediction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Based on Patient-Specific CTA and Computational Modeling.

Extensive research has focused on the evaluation of rupture risks in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) through comprehensive morphologic and hemodynamic analyses, primarily considering the AAA as a whole entity. This study tried to identify the high-risk rupture sites of AAAs more precisely before the fatal process based on morphologic and hemodynamic analyses at the local segment. Computed tomography angiography of a specific AAA patient was conducted at the follow-up 4 months before rupture, 1 day before rupture, the day of the rupture, and 15 days after endovascular aortic repair. The evolution of local morphology and the hemodynamic characteristics at these critical timepoints were investigated based on patient-specific reconstructions and computational fluid dynamics. The morphologic and hemodynamic parameters of the rupture region vary continuously in the process of AAA development and rupture. The surface area and volume of the rupture segment were gradually enlarged at the follow-up 4 months before rupture (47.33 cm2; 67.35 mL), 1 day before rupture (57.23 cm2; 85.24 mL), and on the day of the rupture (62.41cm2; 104.73ml). A prominent decrease in time-averaged wall shear stress and velocity for the rupture segment is observed. The percentages of the lowest time-averaged wall shear stress (<0.1 Pa) area are increased in the AAA region (20.42%, 33.85%, and 53.00%, separately). The results based on precisely rebuilt geometries for the complete follow-ups of patient-specific computed tomography angiography demonstrate that notable morphologic and hemodynamic evolutions have occurred in the local segment of the AAA, which was further proved at the rupture site. The significant changes occurring at the local segment may provide valuable information for the evaluation of aneurysm rupture risk and locate the most probable site of rupture. Capturing the entire process of AAA rupture through CTA imaging is a rare occurrence in clinical practice. The evolution of morphology and hemodynamic characteristics observed in the illustrated results provides valuable insights for clinicians to monitor the state of AAA from a different perspective. These findings suggest that variations in morphology and hemodynamics within the local segment of the AAA might serve as an alternative approach for predicting the rupture risk of AAA.

A Revolutionary Device for Endovascular Aortic Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Pilot Study

Background Endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has been the gold standard since it was established in 1991. Various graft configurations have been developed to overcome the limitations of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), including contralateral gate cannulation (CGC). We propose a new device and technique intended to simplify endovascular AAA repair, along with reports of its application in six patients. Intervention The Taofan and Kang (T&amp;K) bidirectional endovascular aortic repair (B-EVAR (B-EVAR) device uses a main-body stent graft, two-limb extensions, and bare metal stent. The procedure involved accessing the right and left femoral arteries, followed by standard aortography evaluation using a pigtail catheter through the contralateral femoral access. The main body stent graft is deployed through ipsilateral femoral access using a balloon catheter, while the contralateral gate is cannulated with a hydrophilic coated wire. Both balloons were inflated simultaneously to ensure that the wires were in different lumens. Contralateral and ipsilateral extensions were deployed using a limb extension stent graft. Standard aortography evaluation was repeated. Result T&amp;K B-EVAR pilot procedures proved successful in various cases, from simple to complex anatomy, and even with varied graft stent deployment strategies. None of the patients had complications or prolonged length of stay (LOS). Follow-up CT did not reveal any high-pressure endoleaks. Conclusion T&amp;K B-EVAR has been proven to simplify endovascular AAA repair in six patients with excellent results. It is also reproducible, potentially universally applicable, and can offer operators ease of use, faster procedure times, reduced fluoroscopy times, and reduced contrast usage.

Contemporary Single-Center Experience of Complete Aortic Arch Replacement Employing the Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique in Patients with Extensive Aortic Disease

Objective: This study aimed to examine contemporary results of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure in an all-comers patient cohort. Methods: Between January 2017 and May 2024, a total of 132 consecutive patients with either aortic aneurysm (n = 32), acute aortic dissection (n = 32), or chronic aortic dissection (n = 68) underwent total aortic arch replacement employing the FET technique. In-hospital data were collected prospectively and included preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and follow-up results. Results: The median cardiopulmonary bypass time, cardiac ischemia time, and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time were 180 (161–205), 89 (70–113), and 45 (38–54) min, respectively. Total 30-day mortality rate was 7.6% (n = 10). The rate of major postoperative neurological complications was 6.8% (n = 9) for perioperative stroke and 2.3% (n = 3) for permanent spinal cord injury. Five patients (3.8%) required hemofiltration at the time of discharge due to postoperative kidney injury. Rates of subsequent endovascular and open aortic repair following primary FET were 40.9% (n = 54) and 3.8% (n = 5), respectively. The median time to reintervention was 86 (30–439) days. The median follow-up time was 25 (8–52) months, and overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 89%, 89%, and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: Our data are consistent with current reports, indicating that the FET technique is a valuable adjunct in treating extensive aortic arch pathologies. The procedure provides an increasingly safe and effective option for complete aortic arch replacement, even in patients requiring a redo procedure.

Thirty-day outcomes of endovascular repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) has revolutionized the surgical treatment for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). While chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with worse outcomes in major surgeries, the specific outcomes of TEVAR in patients with COPD have not been extensively explored. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day postoperative outcomes of COPD patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD utilizing data from a multi-institutional national registry. Patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2022. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics and preoperative characteristics between patients with and without COPD. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared. There were 172 (9.56%) and 1628 (90.44%) COPD and non-COPD patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD, respectively. Patients with COPD had a higher comorbidity burden. After the propensity-score matching, all 172 COPD patients were matched to 440 non-COPD patients. COPD and non-COPD patients had comparable mortality rates (10.12% vs 6.82%, p = .18). However, COPD patients had a higher risk of pulmonary complications (20.83% vs 13.18%, p = .02). All other 30-day outcomes were similar between the two groups. COPD patients had 58.04% higher pulmonary complications while all other 30-day outcomes were comparable to their non-COPD counterparts. Therefore, close monitoring and timely intervention for pulmonary complications in COPD patients can be important after TEVAR for TBAD. Future studies should investigate long-term outcomes among these COPD patients.

Complex Thoracic Aortic Diseases and Surgery: A Quest for the Golden Fleece

In Greek mythology, the Golden Fleece, a golden-wooled fleece of a winged ram called Chrysomallos, stood as an eternal symbol of authority and power [...]

Aortic arch replacement in patients with previous repair of acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite the popularity of the frozen elephant technique procedure in recent years, evidence is scarce regarding its utilisation for aortic arch replacement following previous acute aortic dissection repair. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyse clinical outcomes of aortic arch replacement in patients with previous repair of acute aortic dissection. A systematic literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science until March 2024 was performed for studies on open aortic arch replacement with or without frozen elephant technique procedure in adult patients after previous acute aortic dissection repair. Early and late postoperative mortality were primary, while postoperative complications were outcomes of interest. Additionally, a meta-analysis was performed to pool the early and late postoperative mortality. A total of 574 studies were identified, of which 9 studies including a total of 677 patients met the eligibility criteria. In-hospital or 30-day postoperative mortality and stroke were 0-17.5% and 0-7.7%, respectively. Duration of follow-up across all studies varied from 1.1 to 5.1 years. All-cause late mortality rate ranges from 5.9-30.5%. Aortic reintervention rate was 4.8-38.7%. The pooled early and late mortality rate were 8.7% ([95% CI: 5.7-13%], I2=52%) and 24.9% ([95% CI: 19.5-31.1%], I2=54%), respectively. Current evidence suggest that relatively younger patients with chronic post-dissection aneurysm or residual aortic dissection after acute aortic dissection repair can undergo an aortic arch replacement by a dedicated aortic team with acceptable mortality risk. However, postoperative neurological deficit remains an issue.

Cerebrospinal fluid drain placement and comprehensive strategies for spinal cord protection in open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Ischaemic spinal cord injury remains a significant challenge in thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. Modern techniques have reduced spinal cord injury rates yet managing patients during and after thoracoabdominal aortic repairs remains complex. This article outlines our comprehensive approach to the prevention of spinal cord injuries in open thoracoabdominal aortic repair operations, focusing on the placement of cerebrospinal fluid drain and intraoperative strategies to enhance spinal cord protection. Preoperative planning involves thorough patient assessment, prehabilitation and nutritional support, detailed imaging review, thorough operative planning and patient blood management. Intraoperative measures include the use of neuromonitoring techniques like near-infrared spectroscopy and motor evoked potentials, as well as cerebrospinal fluid drainage together with blood pressure management to optimize spinal cord perfusion. Postoperative management focuses on maintaining haemodynamic stability with high mean arterial pressure, along with close monitoring and management of the cerebrospinal fluid drain to improve spinal cord perfusion. Additionally, thromboelastography-guided strategies are crucial for optimizing coagulation and addressing postoperative bleeding complications. The goal of this multifaceted approach is to minimize the risk of spinal cord injury, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing the incidence of postoperative paraplegia. Our video tutorial shows some of our preoperative and intraoperative techniques for spinal cord protection in thoracoabdominal aortic repairs.

Primary Aortic Coarctation Repair in Adolescents and Adults

ObjectiveOptimal management of primary aortic coarctation in adolescents and adults remains controversial. We assess early and late mortality of repair, longitudinal anti-hypertensive regimens, and freedom from reintervention for repair-related complications. MethodsFrom 01/01/1999–07/01/2023, 110 adolescents or adults, mean age 39±16 years, underwent primary aortic coarctation repair at Cleveland Clinic. Patients were grouped by repair strategy: stented (60, 55%), grafted (interposition graft or extra-anatomic bypass; 36, 33%), or other (14, 13%). Longitudinal anti-hypertensive regimens were assessed parametrically. Freedom from reintervention and survival were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up for survival was 9.2 years. ResultsOne patient (0.91%) died in-hospital. Major morbidity included stroke (2/107, 1.9%), tracheostomy (2/107, 1.9%), acute renal failure requiring dialysis (1/108, 0.93%), iatrogenic aortic dissection (1/107, 0.93%) and vascular access complication (1/56, 1.8%). Prevalence of patients requiring zero anti-hypertensive medications postoperatively peaked within two years. Twelve-year freedom from reintervention was 69% in the stented group and 97% in the grafted group (P log-rank = .003). Most reinterventions were for in-stent restenosis of bare metal stents. Overall freedom from reintervention at one, five, and 12 years was 91%, 80%, and 76%. Overall survival was 98%, 95%, and 80% at five, 10, and 14 years. ConclusionsA tailored approach to coarctation repair in adolescents and adults utilizing stented repair when anatomically feasible yields excellent short-term outcomes, but patients require persistent hypertension monitoring and have lower than expected long-term survival. Covered stents or stent grafts are preferred to bare metal stents which are subject to in-stent restenosis.

Characterization of cerebrospinal fluid markers as indicators of spinal cord ischemia following an endovascular aortic aneurysm repair procedure.

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) remains one of the most devastating complications in both open and endovascular stent graft repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) can be either thoracic (TEVAR) when it targets the thoracic aortic aneurysm or fenestrated branched when repair involves the visceral and/or renal arteries. Even though EVAR interventions are less invasive than open repair, they are still associated with a significant risk of SCI. The current primary strategy to prevent SCI after TEVAR is to increase and/or maintain spinal cord perfusion pressure (blood flow) by increasing the mean arterial pressure while simultaneously draining CSF. Although the benefit of CSF drainage in EVAR procedures remains uncertain, it provides an opportunity to study the changes in cytokine and oxidative stress markers that may signal the pathophysiology of SCI following EVAR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between stent deployment and CSF cytokine and oxidative stress marker levels as predictors of delayed SCI in patients undergoing an EVAR procedure. There were 16 EVAR cases across 15 patients enrolled in this study, with 1 patient undergoing the procedure twice 1 year apart. The levels of oxidative stress (8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine [8-OHdG], glial fibrillary acidic [GFAP], and lactic acid) and proinflammatory (tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-α], interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β) and antiinflammatory (IL-4) markers were quantified at different time points between 0 and 48 hours after EVAR by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The changes in protein levels of both oxidative stress and inflammatory markers were expressed as fold change from the time of the lumbar drain insertion prior to surgery. Following the EVAR procedure, 8-OHdG resulted in the highest upregulation at later time points postoperatively (48 hours) and this increase was positively correlated with TNF-α level. The data also revealed that IL-6 peaked during the stent deployment intervention and this pattern of expression was positively correlated with the expression of lactic acid. No significant changes were noted in the expression levels of GFAP, lactic acid, and IL-1β. There appears to be a temporal relationship between lumbar CSF drainage and CSF cytokines and oxidative stress markers that may help 1) identify patients at risk for developing delayed SCI and 2) modify patient management to prevent the damage from delayed SCI.

Anesthetic Considerations for Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta.

Thoracic aorta pathologies, especially those of the ascending aorta and aortic arch, were traditionally approached via open surgical repair. This carries risk of ischemic end-organ damage and other complications. Endovascular repair of ascending aorta and aortic arch pathologies is becoming more successful and widespread, thereby posing numerous challenges to the anesthesiologist. This article reviews the anesthesia-pertinent pathophysiology, repair techniques, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative care of patients presenting for endovascular repair of thoracic aorta pathologies.

Results of Local and General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR): A Single Center Experience

Results of Local and General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR): A Single Center Experience

Aortic Leaflet Remodeling for the Repair of Congenitally Malformed Aortic Valve

ObjectiveAortic valve repair techniques are still evolving with better understanding of aortic root and leaflet imaging. This study seeks to present results of an additional new technique in aortic valve repair of patients with congenital heart disease. The technique entails remodeling of the leaflet by intentional peeling of the myxomatous tissue to remodel the thickened leaflets (from the ventricular side of the aortic valve along with thinning and plication of the central region of the leaflets). Other repair techniques are added to complete the repair. MethodsA retrospective chart analysis of 19 patients that underwent aortic valve remodeling for aortic regurgitation and received advanced imaging pre-operative assessment from January 2022 to February 2024. Institutional review board approval was obtained under expedited review for retrospective studies. ResultsAll patients with a wide range of congenital pathologies, underwent leaflet remodeling, nine patients (47%) underwent additional valve-sparing root replacement and six (32%) had subaortic annuloplasty. Fifteen patients (79%) had either moderate or severe aortic insufficiency at the time of presentation. Mean clinical follow-up was 10 months (range: 1.9-31). (Table 1). At follow-up, 7 patients did not have aortic regurgitation on echocardiogram and the remaining 12 had mild regurgitation (Table 2). None of the patients had more than mild regurgitation. All patients assessed for LVEF at follow-up had their EF>50%. None of the patients required re-operation. ConclusionsLeaflet remodeling by intentional peeling of myxomatous tissue expands leaflet dimensions by freeing tethered portions and improves mobility and coaptation. This additional technique will preserve more valves from replacement. However, further follow up is needed.