Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research Articles

Activated clotting time-guided heparinization during open AAA surgery: a pilot study

BackgroundArterial thrombo-embolic complications (TEC) are still common during and after non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP). While unfractionated heparin has been used during NCAP for more than 70 years to prevent TEC, there is no consensus regarding the optimal dosing strategy. The aim of this pilot study was to test the effectiveness and feasibility of an activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization protocol during open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery, in anticipation of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating if ACT-guided heparinization leads to better clinical outcomes compared to a single bolus of 5000 IU of heparin.MethodsA prospective multicentre pilot study was performed. All patients undergoing elective open repair for an AAA (distal of the superior mesenteric artery) between March 2017 and January 2020 were included. Two heparin dosage protocols were compared: ACT-guided heparinization with an initial dose of 100 IU/kg versus a bolus of 5000 IU. The primary outcome was the effectiveness and feasibility of an ACT-guided heparinization protocol with an initial heparin dose of 100 IU/kg during open AAA surgery. Bleeding complications, TEC, and mortality were investigated for safety purposes.ResultsA total of 50 patients were included in the current study. Eighteen patients received a single dose of 5000 IU of heparin and 32 patients received 100 IU/kg of heparin with additional doses based on the ACT. All patients who received the 100 IU/kg dosing protocol reached the target ACT of > 200 s. In the 5000 IU group, TEC occurred in three patients (17%), versus three patients (9.4%) in the 100 IU/kg group. Bleeding complications were found in six patients (33%) in the 5000 IU group and in 9 patients (28%) in the 100 IU/kg group. No mortality occurred in either group.ConclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that ACT-guided heparinization with an initial dose of 100 IU/kg appears to be feasible and leads to adequate anticoagulation levels. Further randomized studies seem feasible and warranted to determine whether ACT-guided heparinization results in better outcomes after open AAA repair.

Secondary aorto-enteric fistula after aortic aneurysm repair

Overview: Secondary Aorto-enteric fistula (sAEF) is a serious complication after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, diagnosis and treatment are the sacraments for a vascular surgeons. Objectives: Describe the patient’s characteristics and treatment results of a series of clinical cases diagnosed with Secondary Aorto-enteric Fistula after surgery to open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair..  Methods: A clinical case series. Results: Report on 3 clinical cases of Secondary Aorto-enteric Fistula admitted to the hospital due to gastrointestinal bleeding, underwent surgery to completely remove the graft infection, restore the intestinal fistula, perform extra-anatomic bypass (axillary-bifemoral), the results showed one patient died early postoperatively due to multiple organ failure, two patients had stable postoperative progress and were discharged. Conclusions: Secondary Aorto-enteric Fistula is a rare complication, diagnosis and treatment are often very difficult, early surgery to remove the graft, performing extra-anatomic bypass is an effective method, helping to reduce the mortality rate.

Protocol for an independent patient data meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for incisional hernia prevention after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a collaborative European Hernia Society project (I-PREVENT-AAA)

IntroductionIncisional hernia (IH) is a prevalent and potentially dangerous complication of abdominal surgery, especially in high-risk groups. Mesh reinforcement of the abdominal wall has been studied as a potential intervention...

Safety and efficacy of ketorolac in improving the prognosis of acute type A aortic dissection patients: a protocol of a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled study

BackgroundAcute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) is a critical and life-threatening condition. Previous research has demonstrated that the use of ketorolac not only reduces the progression, incidence, and severity of aortic aneurysms in animal models, but also decreases postoperative mortality and complications in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm replacement. However, there is a lack of studies investigating the efficacy of ketorolac in treating aTAAD in humans. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ketorolac in patients with aTAAD. Our hypothesis was that ketorolac treatment for aTAAD patients would meet safety indicators and effectively improve patient prognosis.Methods/designThis study is a single-center, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled study. A total of 120 patients with aTAAD will be recruited and will be randomized into the ketorolac group and placebo group with a ratio of 1:1. Ketorolac tromethamine 60 mg per 2 ml will be intramuscularly injected within 2 h before surgery, followed by intramuscular injections of 30 mg per 1 ml BID. on the first and second postoperative days in the Ketorolac group, while 0.9% saline will be administered at the same dose, dosage form, and time in the placebo group. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ketorolac in improving the prognosis of aTAAD. The primary endpoint is the composite endpoint event concerning drug-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints include drug-related adverse events, laboratory examination of blood, diagnostic imaging tests, clinical biomarkers, etc.DiscussionThis study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical College (approval number: 2023–197-02). This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ketorolac in patients with aTAAD. All participating patients will sign an informed consent form, and the trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registrationThe Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn) ChiCTR2300074394. Registered on 4 October 2023.

A Core Outcome Set for Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Technology and advances in clinical care have changed the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) but the clinical effectiveness of continuing advances needs to be assessed. To facilitate rapid synthesis of new evidence and improve stakeholder representation, including patients, the concept of core outcome sets has been developed. Core outcome sets, reflecting the needs of all stakeholders, have been established across several surgical specialties. This study aimed to develop an international core outcome set for intact AAA repair. Following COMET methodology, potential outcomes were identified from a systematic review of published outcomes and focus groups involving patients, carers, and nurses. A 38 question Delphi consensus survey in lay language was developed (with translation to local languages); this included 35 themes identified from the findings of the systematic review and three themes from the focus groups. All three of the themes identified by the focus groups (cognitive, physical, and social functioning) can be evaluated from quality of life instruments, with overall quality of life being identified from the systematic review. The survey was completed by patients, carers or family members, vascular nurses, vascular surgeons, trainees, interventional radiologists, anaesthetists, and industry partners from six European countries. After two rounds of the survey, the top outcomes were discussed at a face to face multistakeholder consensus meeting. The 38 item questionnaire was amended after piloting among all stakeholder groups. After the first round of the Delphi survey (98 respondents), 15 questions were eliminated and 11 further questions were eliminated after round two (90 respondents). This left two outcome questions for discussion at the consensus meeting, where the top six outcomes were unanimously endorsed: mortality at 30 days (or in hospital if longer), secondary AAA rupture, overall quality of life and retention of cognitive functioning after recovery, 5 year survival, and continued sac growth. Six core outcomes are recommended for use as a minimum framework in all future studies and registries of intact open and endovascular AAA repair. Further work to select instruments for quality of life and define instruments for cognitive functioning is needed.

Assessment of fitness for open repair in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) was originally designed as a treatment modality for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) deemed unfit for open repair. However, the definition of "unfit for open repair" is largely subjective and heterogenous. The purpose of this study was to compare patients deemed unfit for open repair who underwent EVAR to a matched cohort who underwent open repair for infrarenal AAAs. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) was queried for patients who underwent EVAR and open infrarenal AAA repair from 2003-2022. Patients that underwent EVAR were included if they were deemed unfit for open repair by the operating surgeon. EVAR patients deemed unfit because of a hostile abdomen were excluded. Patients in both the open and EVAR datasets were excluded if their repair was deemed non-elective or if they had prior aortic surgery. EVAR patients were matched to a cohort of open patients. The primary outcome for this study was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), pulmonary complications, non-home discharge, re-interventions, and 5-year survival. A total of 5,310 EVAR patients were identified who were deemed unfit for open repair. Of those, 3,028 (57.0%) EVAR patients were able to be matched 1:1 to a cohort of open patients. Open patients had higher rates of MACE (20.2% versus 4.4%, P<.001), pulmonary complications (12.8% versus 1.6%, P<.001), non-home discharges (28.5% versus 7.9%, P<.001), and 30-day mortality (4.5% versus 1.4%, P<.001). There were no differences in early survival but open repair had better middle and late survival compared to EVAR over the course of 5 years. A total of 74 (2.4%) EVAR patients had reinterventions during the study period. EVAR patients that required interventions had higher 1-year (40.5%% versus 7.3%, P<.001) and 5-year mortality (43.2% versus 14.1%, P<.001) compared to those that did not require re-interventions. EVAR patients who had reinterventions had higher 1-year (40.5% versus 6.3%, P<.001) and 5-year (43.2% versus 20.3%, P=.006) mortality compared to their matched open cohort. Patients undergoing EVAR for AAAs who are deemed unfit for open repair have better perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to open. However, patients who had an open repair had better middle and late survival over the course of 5 years. The categorization of unfitness for open surgery may be inaccurate and re-evaluation of this terminology/concept should be undertaken.

Earned Outcomes Correlate with Reliability-Adjusted Surgical Mortality after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Predict Future Performance

Cumulative, probability-based metrics are regularly used to measure quality in professional sports, but these methods have not been applied to health care delivery. These techniques have the potential to be particularly useful in describing surgical quality, where case volume is variable and outcomes tend to be dominated by statistical "noise". The established statistical technique used to adjust for differences in case volume is reliability-adjustment which emphasizes statistical "signal"but has several limitations. We sought to validate a novel measure of surgical quality based on earned outcomes methods (deaths above average, DAA) against reliability-adjusted mortality rates, using abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair outcomes to illustrate the measure's performance. Earned outcomes methods were used to calculate the outcome of interest for each patient: deaths above average (DAA). Hospital-level DAA were calculated for non-ruptured open AAA repair and EVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database from 2016-2019. DAA for each center is the sum of observed - predicted risk of death for each patient; predicted risk of death was calculated using established multivariable logistic regression modeling. Correlations of DAA with reliability-adjusted mortality rates and procedure volume were determined. Because an accurate quality metric should correlate with future results, outcomes from 2016-2017 were used to categorize hospital quality based on (1) risk-adjusted mortality, (2) risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality, and (3) DAA. The best performing quality metric was determined by comparing the ability of these categories to predict 2018-2019 risk-adjusted outcomes. During the study period, 3,734 patients underwent open repair (106 hospitals), and 20,680 patients underwent EVAR (183 hospitals). DAA was closely correlated with reliability-adjusted mortality rates for open repair (r=0.94, P<0.001) and EVAR (r=0.99, P<0.001). DAA also correlated with hospital case volume for open repair (r=-.54, P<0.001), but not EVAR (r=0.07, P=0.3). In 2016-2017, most hospitals had 0% mortality (55% open repair, 57% EVAR), making it impossible to evaluate these hospitals using traditional risk-adjusted mortality rates alone. Further, zero mortality hospitals in 2016-2017 did not demonstrate improved outcomes in 2018-2019 for open repair (3.8% vs 4.6%, P=0.5) or EVAR (0.8% vs 1.0%, P=0.2) compared to all other hospitals. In contrast to traditional risk-adjustment, 2016-2017 DAA evenly divided centers into quality quartiles which predicted 2018-2019 performance with increased mortality rate associated with each decrement in quality quartile (Q1 3.2%, Q2 4.0%, Q3 5.1%, Q4 6.0%). There was a significantly higher risk of mortality at worst quartile open repair hospitals compared to best quartile hospitals (OR 2.01, [95% CI 1.07-3.76], P=0.03). Using 2016-2019 DAA to define quality, highest quality quartile open repair hospitals had lower median DAA compared to lowest quality quartile hospitals (-1.18 DAA vs +1.32 DAA, P<0.001), correlating with lower median reliability-adjusted mortality rates (3.6% vs 5.1%, P<0.001). Adjustment for differences in hospital volume is essential when measuring hospital-level outcomes. Earned outcomes accurately categorize hospital quality and correlate with reliability-adjustment but are easier to calculate and interpret. From 2016-2019, highest quality open AAA repair hospitals prevented >40 perioperative deaths compared to the average hospital, and >80 perioperative deaths compared to lowest quality hospitals.

Patient Perceptions of Surveillance of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Over 85s

Recently instigated local practice for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) involves contacting all patients, aged ≥85 years, to discuss with them the advantages and disadvantages of removal from surveillance. However, reasons why patients opt to remain on, or come off, surveillance, are currently unknown. The current study's objective is to explore patient perception of surveillance decision-making. A mixed-methods exploratory evaluation was undertaken using patient feedback obtained from a telephone survey. All patients aged ≥85 years, who had a consultation regarding ongoing surveillance of small AAAs (30-49mm), and consented, were contacted by researchers, who conducted semi-structured interviews concerning factors influencing decision-making. A total of 24 patients (20 male; mean age = 86.9 years) were interviewed; 16/24 (66%) had opted to remain on surveillance, with no age difference between those opting-in or out. Most felt surveillance was important (91%), and that it made them feel safer (73%). The majority (73%) thought they knew what happened when their AAA reached threshold (5.5cm), what happened when a threshold AAA is not fixed (64%), and how major AAA surgery is (59%). However, actual knowledge was poor: most (91%) correctly understood surgery was major; but 56% thought that threshold AAA meant certain death or rupture; and 38% thought immediate surgery was required. Thematic analysis expounded patients' beliefs regarding surveillance, which were summarised in three distinct sub-groups: reliance on professionals' opinions; needing peace of mind; and poor understanding. Whilst most patients find surveillance reassuring, patient knowledge of AAA management at threshold is poor, potentially impacting surveillance decision-making. Elderly patients, with small AAAs contemplating ongoing surveillance, need to be better informed about AAA management at threshold to support shared decision-making.

Sutureless Repair for Iliac Vein Bleeding Using an Elastomeric Sealant.

Addressing venous bleeding is a frequent complication of vascular and abdominopelvic surgeries. We present a novel sutureless repair technique using HydrofitⓇ(Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), an elastomeric sealant. In a patient experiencing common iliac vein bleeding during abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, this technique successfully achieved complete hemostasis. By applying the elastomeric sealant with an autologous arterial patch to the bleeding site, we demonstrate the simplicity and effectiveness of sutureless hemostasis for venous bleeding.

The 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index is a Succinct yet Effective Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Open Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

BackgroundFrailty is an age-related, clinically recognizable state marked by increased susceptibility. The 5-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) offers a concise assessment of frailty and has demonstrated its efficacy in various surgical fields. While the mFI-5 has been validated for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA), its applicability in open surgical repair (OSR) for AAA remains largely unexplored. This study sought to evaluate the utility of mFI-5 in predicting 30-day outcomes following OSR for AAA. MethodsPatients underwent OSR for AAA were identified in ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2012-2021. Patients were stratified into three cohorts: mFI-5 score of 0 (control), 1, and 2+. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes between frail patients and controls adjusting preoperative variables with p-value<0.1. ResultsOf the 5,249 patients who underwent OSR for AAA, 1,043 were controls, 2,938 had an mFI-5 score of 1, and 1,268 had an mFI-5 score of 2+. When compared to the control group, patients with an mFI-5=1 were more likely to have pulmonary events (aOR=1.452, p<0.01), bleeding events (aOR=1.33, p<0.01), wound complications (aOR=2.214, p<0.01), ischemic colitis (aOR=1.616, p=0.01), and unplanned reoperation (aOR=1.292, p=0.04). Those with an mFI-5=2+ demonstrated higher risks of mortality (aOR=1.709, p<0.01), MACE (aOR=1.347, p=0.04), pulmonary events (aOR=2.045, p<0.01), renal dysfunction (aOR=1.568, p<0.01), sepsis (aOR=1.587, p=0.01), bleeding events (aOR=1.429, p<0.01), wound complications (aOR=2.338, p<0.01), ischemic colitis (aOR=1.775, p=0.01), unplanned reoperation (aOR=1.445, p=0.01), operation over 4 hours (aOR=1.34, p<0.01), length of stay over 7 days (aOR=1.324, <0.01), discharge not to home (aOR=1.547, p<0.01), 30-day readmission (aOR=1.657, p=0.01). ConclusionThe mFI-5 emerges as a succinct yet effective indicator of frailty for patients undergoing OSR for AAA. Especially, a mFI-5 score of 2+ is linked with increased 30-day mortality and complications. As such, mFI-5 can be used as a valuable screening tool for frailty in patients undergoing OSR for AAA.

Associations of Preoperative Nutritional Status and Sarcopenia With Mortality in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Study

Objective: The effect of preoperative malnutrition and sarcopenia on outcomes in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after open (OSR) and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR) are undefined. We conducted the study to address this issue in this population. DesignRetrospective observational study. SettingA large tertiary hospital. ParticipantsPatients with AAA who underwent OSR and EVAR. InterventionsEvaluation of nutritional status [Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) scores], muscle size (skeletal muscle index, SMI) and postoperative parameters. Measurements and main results199 patients were reviewed from January 2020 to December 2022. Patients are categorized into group A (CONUT < 4) and group B (CONUT ≥ 4) based on whether their CONUT scores are less than 4. The mortality (P = 0.004) and the incidence of Clavien-Dindo class III complications (P = 0.007) in Group B were higher than those in group A. CONUT score was an independent risk factor for mid-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.329; 95% CI, 1.104-1.697; P = 0.002) and Clavien-Dindo class III complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.225; 95% CI, 1.012-1.482; P = 0.037) according to univariate and multivariate analyses, whereas NRS2002 score and sarcopenia were not. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a lower mid-term survival rate in Group B (log-rank P < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with AAA undergoing OSR or EVAR, CONUT score ≥ 4 was associated with increased Clavien-Dindo class III complications and mortality. Preoperative nutritional status should be evaluated and optimized in this high-risk population.

Follow-up compliance in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at Veterans Affairs hospitals

ObjectiveThe Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend annual imaging surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and every 5 years following open surgical repairs (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Adherence to these guidelines is low outside of clinical trials, and compliance at Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals is not yet well-established. We examined imaging follow-up compliance and mortality rates after AAA repair at VA hospitals. MethodsWe queried the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for elective infrarenal AAA repairs, EVAR and OSR, then merged in follow-up imaging and mortality information. Mortality rate over time was derived using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Generalized estimating equation with a logit link and a sandwich standard error estimate was performed to compare the probability of having annual follow-up imaging over time between procedure types and to identify variables associated with follow-up imaging for EVAR patients. ResultsOur analysis included 11,668 patients who underwent EVAR and 4507 patients who underwent OSR at VA hospitals between the years 2000 and 2019. The 30-day mortality rate for EVAR and OSR was 0.37% and 0.82%, respectively. OSR was associated with lower long-term mortality after adjusting age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and preoperative renal failure with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.92; P < .01). Of surviving patients, the follow-up imaging rate was 69.1% by 1 year post-EVAR. The follow-up rate after 5 years was 45.6% post-EVAR compared with 63.6% post-OSR of surviving patients. A history of smoking or drinking, baseline hypertension, and known cardiac disease were independently associated with poor follow-up after EVAR. ConclusionsPatients undergoing elective open AAA repair in the VA hospital system had lower long-term mortality compared with patients who underwent endovascular repair. Compliance with post-EVAR imaging is low. Patient factors associated with poor post-EVAR imaging surveillance were smoking within the last year, excess alcohol consumption, and cardiac risk factors including hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.

Non-coronary atherosclerosis: a marker of poor prognosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

The presence of non-coronary atherosclerosis (NCA) in patients with coronary artery disease is associated with a poor prognosis. We have studied whether NCA is also a predictor of poorer outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This is an observational study involving 567 consecutive patients who underwent CABG. Variables and prognosis were analysed based on the presence or absence of NCA, defined as previous stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), or peripheral artery disease (PAD) [lower extremity artery disease (LEAD), carotid disease, previous lower limb vascular surgery, or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)]. The primary outcome was a combination of TIA/stroke, acute myocardial infarction, new revascularization procedure, or death. The secondary outcome added the need for LEAD revascularization or AAA surgery. One-hundred thirty-eight patients (24%) had NCA. Among them, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and older age were more frequently present. At multivariate analysis, NCA [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-2.69], age (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.67, p = 0.004), and diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.05-2.15, p = 0.025), were positively associated with the development of the primary outcome, while estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93, p = 0.001) and use of left internal mammary artery (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.82, p = 0.035), were inversely associated with this outcome. NCA was also an independent predictor of the secondary outcome. Mortality was also higher in NCA patients (27.5% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Among patients undergoing CABG, the presence of NCA doubled the risk of developing cardiovascular events, and it was associated with higher mortality.

Acute Intraoperative Conversion from Endovascular to Open vs Planned Open Operation for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Propensity-Score Matched Study from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Targeted Database.

Evaluating outcomes for acute intraoperative conversion to open surgery during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was difficult due to low incidence. This study aimed to compare 30-day outcomes between patients with acute intraoperative conversion during EVAR and planned open surgery, and to identify risk factors associated with acute conversion. Patients underwent EVAR or planned open AAA repair were identified in ACS-NSQIP targeted databases 2012-2021. Patients with acute intraoperative conversion during EVAR were selected. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics, baseline characteristics, surgical indications, aneurysm size and extent, and emergency cases between the conversion open and planned open groups. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. Out of 20,566 EVAR, 177 (0.86%) had acute intraoperative conversion to open surgery. The conversion open group was matched to 504 out of 5,249 planned open patients. Conversion open and planned open groups had comparable 30-day mortality (23.43% vs 17.46%, p=0.09) and organ system complications including MACE (14.86% vs 10.71%, p=0.17), pulmonary complications (17.71% vs 24.01%, p=0.09), and renal complications (8.57% vs 11.11%, p=0.39). The conversion open group had lower bleeding requiring transfusion (48.57% vs 75.60%, p<0.01), shorter operation time (p<0.01), and shorter length of stay (p<0.01). Other postoperative outcomes did not differ. Risk factors associated with acute intraoperative conversion included ruptured aneurysm with or without hypotension. Protective factors included hypertension and aortic distal aneurysm extent. While this study does not endorse a universal "EVAR first" strategy for all patients with AAA, EVAR can be attempted first in eligible AAA patients. Even when EVAR is unsuccessful, intraoperative conversion to open surgery still appears to be safe compared to planned open repair.

Two cases of pararenal artery aortic aneurysm treatment after pancreaticoduodenectomy and abdominal aortic aneurysm stent grafting

BackgroundAcute pancreatitis caused by surgical procedures may occur less frequently in surgeries for aortic aneurysm involving the abdominal branch. However, in such cases, the associated mortality rate increases significantly. There have been few reports on abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery after pancreatoduodenectomy; as such the incidence of postoperative pancreatitis remains unclear.Case presentationTwo cases of pararenal artery aortic aneurysm after pancreaticoduodenectomy and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm are reported. In the first case, a 74-year-old man was diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm and duodenal cancer 6 years earlier and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy after EVAR. Subsequently, the abdominal aorta expanded to 58 mm at the level of the renal artery proximal to the EVAR site. Graft replacement was performed through a left thoraco-retroperitoneal incision. However, the patient died from acute pancreatitis, believed to be caused by intraoperative manipulation. Given this initial experience, in the second case, a 77-year-old man had undergone a pancreaticoduodenectomy for a gastrointestinal stromal tumor 17 years earlier and EVAR for an abdominal aortic aneurysm 10 years earlier. The abdominal aorta had expanded to 50 mm immediately below the right renal artery on the proximal side of the EVAR. Subsequently, hematuria was noted, and he was diagnosed with right ureteral cancer. Autologous transplantation of the left kidney and EVAR was performed avoiding manipulation of the area around the pancreas and achieved good results. Combined right renal and ureteral resections were performed 20 days after EVAR.ConclusionsWhile performing aortic surgery after pancreaticoduodenectomy, surgeons should avoid manipulating tissues around the pancreas.

Hospital Volume of Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair as a Predictor of Mortality After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Registry data suggest that centralising abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery decreases mortality after AAA repair. However, the impact of higher elective volumes on ruptured AAA (rAAA) repair mortality remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine associations between intact AAA (iAAA) repair volume and post-operative rAAA mortality. Using data from official national registries between 2015 - 2019, all iAAA and rAAA repairs were separately analysed across 10 public hospitals. The following were assessed: 30 day and 12 month mortality following open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Associations between the 5 year hospital iAAA repair volumes (organised into tertiles) and rAAA associated mortality were analysed, regardless of treatment modality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to identify iAAA volume thresholds for decreasing rAAA mortality. Subanalysis by treatment type was conducted. Threshold analysis was repeated with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure to confirm the findings. A total of 1 599 iAAAs (80.2% EVAR, 19.8% OSR) and 196 rAAAs (66.3% EVAR, 33.7% OSR) repairs were analysed. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of the volume per hospital/year for all iAAA repairs were 39.2 (31.2, 47.4). The top volume iAAA tertile exhibited lower rAAA associated 30 day (OR 0.374; p = .007) and 12 month (OR 0.264; p < .001) mortality. The ROC analysis revealed a threshold of 40 iAAA repairs per hospital/year (EVAR + OSR) for reduced rAAA mortality. Middle volume hospitals for open iAAA repair had reduced 30 day (OR 0.267; p = .033) and 12 month (OR 0.223; p = .02) mortality, with a threshold of five OSR procedures/year. The MCMC procedure found similar thresholds. No significant association was found between elective EVAR volumes and ruptured EVAR mortality. Higher iAAA repair volumes correlated with lower rAAA mortality, particularly for OSR. The recommended iAAA repair threshold is 40 procedures/year and five procedures/year for OSR. These findings support high elective volumes in improving rAAA mortality, especially in OSR.

Trends in AAA Repair in Australia Over Twenty Years.

The advent of endovascular techniques has revolutionised the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Many countries have seen a transition from open AAA repair (OAR) to endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) over the past 25 years. The only study done in Australia that describes this change was done in the private sector. Majority of healthcare in Australia is delivered through the public, universal healthcare system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in AAA repair in the Australian public sector over the past two decades. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) Procedures Data Cubes from the National Hospitals Data Collection was used to extract data pertaining to AAA repairs from 2000 to 2021. Population data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics was used to calculate incidence of each type of repair per 100,000 population. There were 65,529 AAA repairs performed in the Australian public sector from 2000 to 2021. EVARs accounted for 64.4% (42,205) and OARs accounted for 35.6% (23, 324) of them. EVAR surpassed OAR as the preferred method of AAA repair in 2006. This trend was observed in both males and females and across all age groups. There was a consistent and steady transition from OAR to EVAR over the 21 year period with EVAR surpassing OAR as the preferred method of AAA repair relatively early in Australia compared to other countries. Further research that investigates medium- and long-term outcomes of newer stent grafts is needed to further ascertain the continued viability and effectiveness of this trend in AAA treatment.

Wound healing and hernia after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - Onlay self-gripping polyester mesh reinforcement compared with small bite sutured closure.

Prophylactic mesh implantation following open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a debatable subject. To assess the efficacy of a self-gripping polyester mesh used in on-lay technique to prevent incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 495 patients who underwent aortic surgery between May 2017 and May 2021. Patients included in the study underwent open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with closure of the abdominal wall with either small bite suture technique or prophylactic mesh reinforcement. Primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of incisional hernia during a two-year follow-up period. Secondary endpoints were mesh-related complications. Mesh implantation with the on-lay technique was successful in all cases. No patient in the mesh group developed an incisional hernia during the 24-month follow-up period. Two patients in the non-mesh group developed a symptomatic incisional hernia during the follow-up period at 6 months. Three cases of post-operative access site complications were observed in the mesh group. Application of a self-gripping polyester mesh using the on-lay technique demonstrates acceptable early-durability after open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, it appears to be associated with a number of post-operative access site complications.

Impact of Serum Albumin Levels and Body Mass Index on Outcomes of Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Korean Population

Although obese patients seem to be susceptible to chronic diseases, obesity paradox has been observed in the field of vascular surgery, in which many previous studies have reported that overweight patients have good postoperative outcomes and underweight patients have poor postoperative outcomes. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) and serum albumin levels, which are evaluated as indicators of nutritional status, on outcomes of open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. We reviewed the vascular surgery database of a single tertiary referral center for all patients who underwent open AAA repair due to degenerative etiology from 1996 to 2021. To analyze the effect of BMI, patients were classified into 4 groups according to the Asian-Pacific classification of BMI: underweight (UW) (<18.5kg/m2), normal weight (NW) (18.5-22.9kg/m2), overweight (OW) (23-24.9kg/m2), and obese (OB) (≥25kg/m2). The χ2, Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare demographics, comorbidities, radiologic findings, surgical details, and 1-year mortality rates between the 4 groups. We also compared the preoperative serum albumin levels of each group to assess nutritional status indirectly. Cox's proportional hazards model was performed to determine factors associated with mortality. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and the differences were analyzed by a log-rank test. We did not perform an analysis for 30-day mortality because cases of 30-day mortality in UW patients were rare due to the unbalanced distribution of the number of patients in the 4 groups. Among a total of 678 patients, 22 were classified as UW (3.2%), 200 as NW (29.5%), 183 as OW (27.1%), and 273 as OB (40.1%). The median age was 70 (64-75) years and 577 of 678 (85.1%) patients were male gender. Higher serum albumin level was associated with decreased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.63; P=0.001). UW patients had a higher 1-year mortality rate than NW patients (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.02-13.18; P=0.046). OB patients had a lower overall mortality rate than NW patients (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1; P=0.05). Low BMI (<18.5kg/m2) and low serum albumin level were associated with poor 1-year survival after elective open AAA repair. These patients also need more careful preoperative intervention, like weight gain or nutritional support, for better outcomes. The obesity paradox existed in our study; high BMI (≥25kg/m2) was associated with better overall survival after elective open AAA repair.

Open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms at the present stage

Open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms at the present stage