Open Abdominal Aneurysm Research Articles

Impact of the endovascular revolution on vascular training through analysis of national data case reports

BackgroundIn the last couple of decades, there has been a shift in use of endovascular procedures in vascular surgery. We aim to examine the impact of this endovascular shift on vascular trainees, determine whether the surgical experiences of trainees in the integrated residency and fellowship program changed over time, and identify differences between the two training paradigms. MethodsData were extracted from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education National Data Case Logs for the vascular surgery fellowship (1999-2021) and integrated residency (2012-2021) programs. Every procedure was categorized as open or endovascular, then designated into the following subcategories: thoracic aneurysm repairs, cerebrovascular, abdominal aneurysm repairs, venous, vascular access, peripheral arterial disease, visceral, or miscellaneous. We compared the prevalence of open and endovascular cases in the fellowship and integrated residency using data from overlapping years (2012-2021). In addition, we compared the mean number of cases per trainee per year within designated time intervals. The vascular surgery fellowship was grouped into three intervals: 1999 to 2006, 2006 to 2013, and 2013 to 2021; the integrated vascular surgery residency was grouped into two intervals: 2012 to 2017 and 2017 to 2021. Data were standardized to represent the average number of cases per trainee per year. ResultsWithin the fellowship, we found a 362.37% increase in endovascular procedures (mean, 56.80 ± 32.57 vs 262.63 ± 9.91; P < .001), although there was only a 32.47% increase in open procedures (220.19 ± 4.55 vs 291.68 ± 8.20) between the first and last time intervals. There was a decrease in abdominal aneurysm repair (24.46 ± 7.30 vs 13.85 ± 0.58; P < .001) and visceral (6.41 ± 0.44 vs 5.80 ± 0.42; P = .039) open procedures. For the integrated residency, there was an increase in open procedures by 8.52% (352.18 ± 8.23 vs 382.20 ± 5.84; P < .001). Residents had greater total, open, and endovascular procedures per year than fellows (all P < .001). Chief residents had approximately one-half as many cases as vascular fellows per year. Fellows performed more open abdominal aneurysm repair (14.04 ± 0.80 vs 12.40 ± 1.32; P = .007) and visceral (5.83 ± 0.41 vs 4.88 ± 0.46; P > .001) procedures than residents. Overall, 52% to 53% of cases performed by trainees per year were open procedures in both the fellowship and integrated residency (288.56 ± 12.10 vs 261.27 ± 10.13, 365.52 ± 17.23 vs 319.58 ± 6.62; both P < .001). Within the subcategories, only cerebrovascular, vascular access, and miscellaneous had more open procedures performed per trainee. ConclusionsVascular surgery training has incorporated new endovascular techniques and technologies while maintaining operative training in open procedures. Despite changes in vascular surgery training, trainees are still performing more open procedures than endovascular procedures per year. However, there are evolving deficits in specific types of procedures.

Impact of Previous Open Abdominal Surgery on Open Abdominal Aortic Repair: A Study from the NSQIP Database

While endovascular aneurysm repair has become a first-line strategy in many centers, open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is still the best option for certain patients. A significant number of patients who are offered OSR for AAA have been previously submitted to other open abdominal surgeries (PAS). It is unclear, however, how this may impact their outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an association between PAS and outcomes of OSR of AAA. This is a retrospective cohort study based on clinical data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, including all patients undergoing elective OSR for AAA between 2011 and 2017. Excluded were patients with missing data on prior abdominal surgery, supramesenteric clamping, or urgent repairs. Patients with prior abdominal surgery (PAS) and patients without prior abdominal surgeries (nonPAS) were compared. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were operating time, ischemic colitis, postoperative complications, and lengths of hospital stay. Of the 2034 patients included, 27% had previous open abdominal surgery and 73% did not. Overall, the median age was 71(interquartile range 65-76), 72% of patients were male, 44% were smokers, and the average body mass index was 27kg/m2. Univariate analysis showed no difference in postoperative 30-day mortality (4.0% PAS vs. 4.1% nonPAS, P=0.91) or overall postoperative complication rates (33% PAS vs. 29% nonPAS, P=0.07). Previous open abdominal surgery was significantly associated with longer operating times (P=0.032) and an almost doubled rate of ischemic colitis (4.7% PAS vs. 2.6% nonPAS, P=0.02). Postoperative intensive care unit and hospitalization were also significantly longer in patients with prior abdominal surgery (P=0.005 and P=0.014, respectively). Finally, there were significantly less patients discharged home, as opposed to institutionalized care (75.7% PAS down from 82.4% nonPAS, P=0.001). Despite these initial univariate analysis results, on multivariate analysis, PAS actually did not prove to be a statistically significant independent risk factor for 30-day mortality, ischemic colitis, or longer operating times. This study suggests that patients who have undergone PAS may have some disadvantages in OSR of AAA. However, these negative trends do not go so far as to statistically significantly identify PAS as an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality, ischemic colitis, or longer operating times. As such, we suggest that a history of previous open abdominal surgery, in and of its own, should not exclude patients from consideration for open aortic abdominal aneurysm repair.

Indocyanin Green Fluorescence Evaluation of Colonic Perfusion During Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Colonic ischaemia is a rare but devastating complication of open aortic aneurysm repair and is associated with high morbidity and a mortality of up to 50%. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of using indocyanin green florescence (ICG) to interrogate colonic perfusion intra-operatively. Prospective observational study. All elective open abdominal aneurysm repairs over a 6month period underwent colonic perfusion interrogation with ICG according to a pre-defined protocol. Patient demographics and imaging findings were recorded prior to surgery. ICG was given just prior to laparotomy closure. Time to florescence was measured from the start of IV administration to surgeon defined maximal florescence of the sigmoid colon. Ten patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All patients were male with an average age of 69.7years. Inferior mesenteric artery reimplantation was performed in 5 patients. Median colonic fluorescence time was 58s. No complications related to ICG were identified. A single patient had clinical concern of colonic ischaemia and delayed perfusion (>3min) on ICG; colorectal opinion advised not for immediate resection. At relook laparotomy, ischaemic colon at the area of demarcation was noted and a Hartmann's procedure was performed. No other patients had delayed perfusion and no further episodes of colonic ischaemia were noted. IMA reimplantation did not show statistical difference in colonic ICG time (P = .81, 95% CI -1.98 to 2.45). There was no statistical difference between operating times between the cohort and all repairs performed 6 months before the data collection (P = .59, 95% CI -.73 to 1.24). In this pilot study ICG appears to be a safe and useful adjunct in objective assessment of colonic perfusion during open AAA repair. Further research is required to fully determine its role in this cohort of patients.

Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors are Superior to Beta Blockers in Preventing Mortality and Aneurysmal Rupture Following Open and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Optimal blood pressure control following endovascular (EVAR) or open abdominal aneurysm repair (OAR) is crucial in reducing post repair complications. In hospital continuation of preoperative beta blocker (BB) has shown a significant reduction in postoperative mortality following repair. Although treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) is associated with a reduction in mortality among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) regardless of repair status. Nevertheless, the best medical therapy to control hypertension following AAA repair is yet to be determined.

Long-term age-stratified survival following endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveThe long-term survival differences between endovascular repair (EVAR) and open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and specifically the impact of age on these differences remain a topic of debate. Therefore, we compared the long-term mortality between EVARand open abdominal aneurysm repair for patients of different ages. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from patients undergoing elective EVAR or open repair for infrarenal AAAs within the Vascular Quality Initiative multinational clinical registry (2003-2021). The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality comparing EVAR and open repair for patients aged less than 65 years, between 65 and 79 years, and those aged 80 and older. In addition, we investigated the interaction between repair modality and 10-year hazard of mortality for sex, aneurysm diameter, and several preoperative comorbid conditions within each age category. To account for the nonrandom assignment of treatment, we used propensity scores and inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazard analysis. ResultsWe identified 48,074 patients undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aneurysm repair (89% EVAR) within the study period, including 7940 patients aged less than 65, 29,555 aged between 65 and 79, and 10,579 aged 80 years or more. EVAR was associated with a higher propensity score-adjusted long-term hazard of mortality compared with open repair in the cohort aged less than 65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.86; P = .026). The mortality was similar in the age cohort between 65 and 79 (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.10; P = .43), whereas EVAR was associated with a lower hazard of mortality in the cohort aged 80 years or more (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.86; P = .004). In patients aged less than 65 years, the hazard of mortality was higher with EVAR compared with open repair in those with female sex (HR, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.75-11.0), an aneurysm diameter of more than 65 mm (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.11-4.34), and an absence of coronary artery disease (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.83-1.91), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.03-1.92), and renal dysfunction (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.04-2.05). In the patient cohort aged 80 and older, a lower hazard of mortality for EVAR versus open repair was observed for male patients or those with small aneurysms or certain comorbidities. ConclusionsIn a selected group of young patients with a substantial life expectancy, the long-term mortality is higher with EVAR compared with open repair for infrarenal AAAs. Long-term mortality with EVAR is similar in the middle cohort and lower in the elderly cohort compared with open repair.

Relationship between intraoperative dopamine infusion and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing open abdominal aorta aneurysm repair

BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Dopamine has been frequently used in these patients to prevent AKI. We aimed to clarify the relationship between intraoperative dopamine infusion and postoperative AKI in patients undergoing open AAA repair.MethodsWe analyzed 294 patients who underwent open AAA repair at a single tertiary center from 2009 to 2018, retrospectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative AKI, determined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definition, after open AAA repair. Secondary outcomes included survival outcome, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and postoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT).ResultsPostoperative AKI occurred in 21.8% (64 out of 294 patients) The risk of postoperative AKI by intraoperative dopamine infusion was greater after adjusting for risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–5.89; P = 0.028) and after propensity score matching (OR 3.22; 95% CI 1.12–9.24; P = 0.030). On the contrary, intraoperative norepinephrine use was not associated with postoperative AKI (use vs. no use; 19.3 vs. 22.4%; P = 0.615). Patients who used dopamine showed higher requirement for postoperative RRT (6.8 vs. 1.2%; P = 0.045) and longer hospital length of stay (18 vs. 16 days, P = 0.024).ConclusionsIntraoperative dopamine infusion was associated with more frequent postoperative AKI, postoperative RRT, and longer hospital length of stay in patients undergoing AAA repair, when compared to norepinephrine. Further prospective randomized clinical trial may be necessary for this topic.

Treatment Strategies for Improving the Surgical Outcomes of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Single-Center Experience in Japan

Objective: We aimed to examine the surgical outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm cases at our hospital and considered strategies for improvement.Material and Methods: We examined the preoperative characteristics of hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes of 91 surgical cases of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm performed between January 2009 and December 2020 at our hospital.Results: Of the 91 cases, 24 died at the hospital (mortality, 26.3%). Mortality was mostly due to hemorrhage/disseminated intravascular coagulation and intestinal necrosis. Ten patients required preoperative aortic clamp by thoracotomy or insertion of intra-aortic balloon occlusion, and eight of them died. Ten patients required open abdominal management due to abdominal compartment syndrome, and five of them died. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the long-term results of the open repair and abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).Conclusion: To improve the surgical outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, it is necessary to start surgery immediately. Therefore, the choice of surgical method (open surgery or EVAR) should be based on the resources and discretion of the hospital. To prevent postoperative intestinal necrosis, risk factors for acute compartment syndrome should be considered, and open abdominal management should be introduced.

Percutaneous Drainage for Aortic Graft Infection Post-aneurysm Repair: A Viable Option?

PurposeNon-operative management of aortic graft infection is usually only considered in a palliative context. We describe the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous drainage of aortic graft infections (AGI) following either open or endovascular repair of aneurysmal disease.MethodsTwelve consecutive patients (11 males, 1 female, mean age 72.7 ± 10.3 years, age range 52-88 years) between January 2010-July 2020 who underwent percutaneous drain insertion in either an infected aortic sac or periaortic abscess cavity following endovascular or open surgical graft repair were identified. Patient and procedural characteristics as well as clinical outcomes were determined.ResultsOf the 12 patients who underwent percutaneous drain insertion, five (41.7%) had undergone open abdominal aneurysm repair, one (8.3%) open thoracoabdominal aneurysmal repair, and six (50%) endovascular abdominal aneurysm repairs. Drain size ranged from 10-20 French. All were inserted under ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and/or fluoroscopic guidance. Median duration of drain placement was 55.2 days (range 3-174). Five patients (41.7%) had the drain in place as a stabilizing bridge until or after definitive surgical explantation and aortic reconstruction. Seven patients (58.3%) were managed with drain placement and antibiotic therapy without surgical intervention. Six (50%) were alive at the most recent time of follow-up (median, 732 days, range 166-1650 days). Three patients (25%) died during follow-up with causes including erosion of aortic reconstruction into sigmoid colon, unrelated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation, and severe clostridium difficile colitis and pseudomonal pneumonia (median 1244 days, range 992-1597 days). Three (25%) patients were lost to follow-up. No drain-related complications were noted.ConclusionPercutaneous drainage of AGI following endovascular or open aneurysm repair is a safe and viable management option either as a temporizing measure as a bridge to surgical graft explantation or as a non-surgical therapy for long term management.

Female sex is independently associated with in-hospital mortality after endovascular aortic repair for ruptured aortic aneurysm

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) can treat anatomically compatible ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA), but registry data suggests that women undergo more open abdominal aneurysm repairs than men. We evaluate in-hospital outcomes of EVAR for rAAA by sex. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry was queried from 2013 to 2019 for rAAA patients treated with EVAR. Univariate analysis was performed with Student's t-test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to assess the association between female sex and inpatient mortality. A total of 1775 patients were included (23.8% female). Female rAAA patients were older (P< 0.01) and weighed less (P < 0.01). They were less likely to have smoked (P <.0 001) and had lower creatinine (1.29 vs. 1.43, P < 0.01) and hemoglobin (10.7 vs. 11.7, P < 0.01). Women had smaller maximum aortic diameters (74 vs. 66 mm, P < 0.01) and were less likely to have iliac aneurysms (P < 0.001). Women were more likely to have concomitant femoral endarterectomy (8.5% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.03). Despite having no significant difference in complication or reintervention rates, women had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (45.9% vs. 34.5%, P < 0.01). In a logistic regression model for predictors of in-hospital mortality (χ2 < .01), increased age (OR 1.08, P < 0.01), female sex (OR 1.7, P=0.02), preoperative cardiac arrest (OR 5.29, P < 0.01), concurrent iliac stenting (OR 2.38, P=0.02), postoperative mesenteric ischemia (OR 2.51, P < 0.01) and postoperative transfusion (OR 1.06, P < 0.01) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Increased preoperative hemoglobin was protective (OR 0.89, P < 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: Female sex is independently associated with in-hospital mortality after EVAR for rAAA, suggesting a relationship beyond anatomical, biochemical, and procedural covariates.

Vascular Surgery Training Trends in Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair after the Introduction of Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Vascular Surgery Training Trends in Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair after the Introduction of Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Ten-Year Age-stratified Survival Following Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

The long-term survival differences between endovascular and open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and the impact of age on these differences remain a topic of debate. Therefore, we compared the long-term mortality between endovascular and open abdominal aneurysm repair for patients of different ages.

Compromised Pelvic Perfusion Is Associated With Poor Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

The two feared complications of pelvic flow disruption include buttock ischemia and mesenteric ischemia. In cases of extensive aortic coverage, spinal cord ischemia is also a risk. Unilateral or bilateral hypogastric artery flow interruption, either from atherosclerosis or intentionally, is considered problematic in endovascular repair and has not been well studied in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAR). We examined the effect of the interruption of flow to one or both hypogastric arteries on the outcomes after OAR.

Pre-Operative Fasting Provides Long Term Protection Against Chronic Renal Damage Induced by Ischaemia Reperfusion Injury in Wild Type and Aneurysm Prone Fibulin-4 Mice

Renal ischaemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is inevitable during open repair of pararenal aortic aneurysms. Pre-operative fasting potently increases resistance against IRI. The effect of fasting on IRI was examined in a hypomorphic Fibulin-4 mouse model (Fibulin-4+/R), which is predisposed to develop aortic aneurysms. Wild type (WT) and Fibulin-4+/R mice were either fed ad libitum (AL) or fasted for two days before renal IRI induction by temporary clamping of the renal artery and vein of both kidneys. Six hours, 48h, and seven days post-operatively, serum urea levels, renal histology, and mRNA expression levels of inflammatory and injury genes were determined to assess kidney function and damage. Additionally, matrix metalloproteinase activity in the kidney was assessed six months after IRI. Two days of fasting improved survival the first week after renal IRI in WT mice compared with AL fed mice. Short term AL fed Fibulin-4+/R mice showed improved survival and kidney function compared with AL fed WT mice, which could not be further enhanced by fasting. Both fasted WT and Fibulin-4+/R mice showed improved survival, kidney function and morphology compared with AL fed mice six months after renal IRI. Fibulin-4+/R kidneys of fasted mice showed reduced apoptosis together with increased matrix metalloprotease activity levels compared with AL fed Fibulin-4+/R mice, indicative of increased matrix remodelling. Fibulin-4+/R mice are naturally protected against the short-term, but not long-term, consequences of renal IRI. Pre-operative fasting protects against renal IRI and prevents (long-term) deterioration of kidney function and morphology in both WT and Fibulin-4+/R mice. These data suggest that pre-operative fasting may decrease renal damage in patients undergoing open abdominal aneurysm repair.

Not All Databases Are Created Equal, a Comparison of Administrative Data and Quality Improvement Registries for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Databases are essential in evaluating surgical outcomes. However, there are important differences in how data from administrative databases and surgical quality improvement (QI) registries are collected and interpreted. Therefore, we aim to compare trends, demographics, and outcomes of open and endovascular aortic abdominal aneurysm (AAA) repair in an administrative database and two QI registries.

One-year patient survival correlates with surgeon volume after elective open abdominal aortic surgery

ObjectiveVolume-outcome relationships in surgery have been well established. Studies have shown that high-volume surgeons provide improved outcomes in performing open abdominal aneurysm repairs. The hypothesis of this study was that high-volume surgeons provide superior short-term and midterm outcomes of elective open aortic operations compared with low-volume surgeons. MethodsWe evaluated patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, aortofemoral bypass, and aortomesenteric bypass by board-certified vascular surgeons using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2002 to 2014. The Contal and O'Quigley technique was used to estimate a cut point objectively and provided an estimate of significance. A division using average yearly volumes (averaged during 3 years) of seven or more cases and fewer than seven cases per year returned the highest Q statistic, and this grouping was used to classify high-volume and low-volume provider groups. Rates of complications during index hospitalization, length of stay, 30-day survival, 90-day survival, 1-year survival, and cause of death were analyzed using mixed effect models. ResultsIn 118 hospitals during the 13-year period, 266 board-certified vascular surgeons performed 244 aortomesenteric bypasses, 4202 aortofemoral bypasses, and 6126 abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. High-volume surgeons' rates of complications during index hospitalization, 30-day survival, 90-day survival, and 1-year survival were superior to those of low-volume surgeons. The Contal and O'Quigley technique returned an estimate of seven operations per year for optimal survival during 1 year. This cutoff is associated with an adjusted 1-year hazard ratio of 0.687 (P = .003), a 2.69% difference in 1-year all-cause survival (P = .003), and a 1.76-day reduction in the mean length of stay at index hospitalization (P < .001). Higher volume surgeons showed a 25.0%, 43.4%, 42.4%, 40.6%, and 45.0% reduction in postoperative rates of acute renal failure (P < .001), hemorrhage (P < .001), pulmonary failure (P < .001), sepsis (P < .001), and venous thromboembolism (P < .001), respectively. Abdominal abscess, acute renal failure, hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, and sepsis were associated with increased cardiovascular cause-specific mortality after open aortic operations (P < .001). ConclusionsThese data demonstrate that high-volume surgeons performing elective open aortic operations provide reduced complications and improved short-term and midterm survival compared with low-volume surgeons. Clinical and postoperative variables that are associated with increased cardiovascular cause-specific mortality are also identified. These data provide further evidence that elective open abdominal vascular surgery should be centralized to high-volume surgeons.

Does the choice of intraoperative fluid modify abdominal aneurysm repair outcomes?: A cohort analysis.

Intraoperatively administered hydroxyethyl starch could be a risk indicator for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in vascular surgical patients.In a single-center retrospective cohort analysis, we assessed the impact of hydroxyethyl starch and other risk indicators on AKI and mortality in 1095 patients undergoing elective open abdominal aneurysm repair (AAA-OR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). We established logistic regression models to determine the effect of various risk indicators, including hydroxyethyl starch, on AKI, as well as Cox proportional hazard models to assess the effect on mortality.The use of intravenous hydroxyethyl starch was not associated with an increased risk of AKI or mortality. Patients undergoing EVAR were less likely to develop AKI (4% vs 18%). Multivariate risk indicators associated for AKI included suprarenal or pararenal aortic cross-clamp [odds ratio (OR), 4.44; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.538-7.784; P < .001] and procedure length (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.003-1.007; P < .001), and favored EVAR (OR, 0.351; 95% CI, 0.118-0.654; P < .01). Main multivariate risk indicators associated with mortality included patients needing an urgent procedure [hazard ratio (HR), 2.294; 95% CI, 1.541-3.413; P < .001], those with suprarenal or pararenal aortic cross-clamp (HR, 1.756; 95% CI, 1.247-2.472; P < .01), and patients undergoing EVAR (HR, 1.654; 95% CI, 1.292-2.118; P < .001).We found neither a benefit nor a negative effect of hydroxyethyl starch on the risk of AKI or mortality. Instead, other variables and comorbidities were found to be relevant for the development of postoperative AKI and survival. Nevertheless, clinicians should be aware of the high risk of postoperative AKI, particularly among those undergoing AAA-OR procedures.

What Procedures are Rural General Surgeons Performing and are They Prepared to Perform Specialty Procedures in Practice?

Rural surgeons are performing operations typically performed by "specialists." This study describes specialty procedures performed by general surgeons operating in a rural state and how prepared the surgeons felt starting their rural practice after residency A survey was sent to all exclusively rural surgeons actively practicing in the state, inquiring about their perception of preparedness for rural practice and specialty procedures performed. The survey had a 65.2 per cent response rate. Responders felt well prepared for rural practice after residency (mean response 4.6 ± 0.8 on a Likert scale from 1 to 5; 5 = "well prepared"). Noteworthy, specialty procedures performed by rural surgeons included hysterectomies (51.2%), thyroidectomies (81.4%), parathyroidectomies (60.5%), carotid endarterectomies (11.6%), video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (37.2%), and lobectomies (23.3%). Prominent write-ins included nephrectomies (n = 1), ileal conduits (n = 1), open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n = 1), Whipples (n = 3), and liver resections (n = 2). Rural general surgeons perform many major operations usually performed by specialists. These surgeons felt well prepared for these operations out of residency.

Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Prophylactic Mesh for Hernia Prevention: Has the Time Arrived?

Incisional and parastomal hernias continue to be vexing problems for patients and surgeons. Risk factors are generally patient-related and/or technical in nature, and in some cases, can be altered, resulting in improved outcomes. Improved fascial closure techniques can only partly reduce the risk of incisional hernia formation. Even under optimal circumstances, using time tested closure techniques and materials, the rate remains high, due primarily to factors that are not modifiable or are unidentifiable. In such cases, there may be a beneficial role for prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA), wherein mesh is implanted at the time of initial surgery or stoma formation. Several high-risk groups that might benefit from PMA have been identified, including patients undergoing open abdominal aneurysm repair or colorectal procedures, obese patients, and patients requiring creation of permanent gastrointestinal or urological stomas. Although the initial results of PMA are promising, the benefits of this strategy must be weighed against potential risks. Outcome measures to assess efficacy should include not only hernia recurrence but also quality of life, surgical-site occurrences, and cost. Further studies are warranted to predict which specific patient populations might benefit most from PMA and to identify ideal mesh materials as well as preferred implantation sites and methods of mesh fixation.

Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Infection of the vascular graft represents one of the most threatening complications after aortic repair. It is rare and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to present short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of infected aortic grafts after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Data of all patients affected by aortic graft infection after aneurysm repair who underwent an explantation of a conventional or endovascular aortic graft between January 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent in situ reconstruction using a rifampicin soaked synthetic graft. The primary endpoint of this study was 30 day mortality; secondary endpoints were major post-operative complications. Twenty-six patients were included in the cohort, 16 with an infected endograft (iEVAR) and 10 patients with an infected conventional graft (iOAR). Thirty-day mortality was 23.1% overall, 37.5% for iEVAR and 0% (p=.027) for iOAR. Post-operative major complications occurred in eight (50%) patients from the iEVAR group and in four (40%) patients from the iOAR group (p=.619). The supravisceral clamping rate was higher in patients with infected iEVAR (93.8 vs. 20%, p=.001), furthermore a greater incidence of post-operative acute kidney injury was observed (50 vs. 0%, p=.009). Explantation of the graft and in situ reconstruction for aortic graft infection is accepted as the therapy of choice. However, re-operation for iEVAR is related to significantly higher mortality and morbidity rates. The need for suprarenal aortic clamping seems to be a possible explanation for worse outcomes in iEVAR.