Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Research Articles

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Investigating the Safety And Efficacy of a Herbal Formulation on Knee Joint Function in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Background: Current treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) pain and stiffness have limitations, including adverse effects. Therefore, effective and safe complementary or alternative therapies are needed. Dietary supplement GJ 191, comprising Epimedium, Dioscorea, and Salvia miltiorrhiza extracts, may address this need. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated GJ 191 supplementation on knee OA symptoms. Seventy-two adults (40-75 years) with mild to moderate knee OA and mild to moderate knee pain were enrolled. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quality of Life questionnaire, knee joint range of motion, serum C-reactive protein, and rescue medication use were assessed. The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and stiffness scores were computed using KOOS scores. Results: Decreases in WOMAC pain scores were reported by both GJ 191 and placebo groups after 6 (-1.78 ± 2.71 and -1.34 ± 1.93, respectively; p < 0.01) and 12 (-2.31 ± 2.83 and -1.59 ± 2.69, respectively; p < 0.01) weeks, with no significant difference between groups. There were decreases in WOMAC stiffness scores for participants supplemented with GJ 191 by 0.53 ± 1.22 and 0.72 ± 1.46 (p ≤0.02) after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively, with respective decreases of 0.81 ± 1.51 and 0.75 ± 1.85 (p ≤0.03) for those on placebo. Significant improvements in current pain, as assessed by the Pain VAS, and bodily pain were reported by the GJ 191 group after 6 and 12 weeks, while the placebo group only reported significant improvements in these measures after 12 weeks. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in pain and stiffness scores between GJ 191 and placebo over the 12 weeks. While both groups reported improvements in WOMAC pain from baseline, improvements in current and bodily pain were experienced sooner with GJ 191 than placebo and were sustained over the study period. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. (CTR#: NCT04395547).

The collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique demonstrates superior cartilage repair compared to microfracture for cartilage defects of the knee joint, regardless of age.

This study investigated whether age affects clinical outcomes and cartilage repair quality in patients who underwent collagen-augmented chondrogenesis. The study included patients who underwent either the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique or microfracture for cartilage defects of the knee joint of International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3 or 4. Patients were categorised according to an age threshold of 50 years and the treatment method, whether collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique or microfracture. Group 1 comprised 31 patients aged 50 years or older who received the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique, Group 2 consisted of 32 patients under the age of 50 years who received the collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique and Group 3 included 243 patients aged 50 years or older who received microfracture. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the walking visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scale score (WOMAC) two years after surgery. For patients with magnetic resonance imaging results 1 year postoperatively (Group 1: 30 patients; Group 2: 31 patients; and Group 3: 31 patients), Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) assessment was used to evaluate repaired cartilage lesions. There were no significant differences in the VAS and WOMAC scores between the three groups 2 years after surgery (all n.s.). The MOCART score in patients who underwent MRI at 1 year postoperatively showed significant differences in the degree of defect repair, integration with the border zone, surface of the repaired tissue, adhesion and total score among the three groups (all p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis revealed no difference in the total MOCART scores between Groups 1 and 2. However, Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher MOCART scores than Group 3 1 year after surgery (all p < 0.05). The collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique group showed improved quality of cartilage repair compared to the microfracture group, regardless of patient age. Compared with simple microfracture treatment, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the patient groups, related to age. Level Ⅲ.

Comparative study of total knee arthroplasty assisted by robot and remote sensing navigation system

To compare clinical efficacy of robot-assisted (RA) and remote sensing navigation alignment (RSNA) system-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). From March 2023 to June 2023, 60 patients who underwent the first unilateral TKA due to severe knee osteoarthritis (KOA) were admitted and divided into RSNA group and RA group according to different treatment methods, with 30 patients in each group. There were 5 males and 25 females in RSNA group, aged from 56 to 81 years old with an average of(66.33±7.16) years old;body mass index(BMI) ranged from 19.87 to 38.54 kg·m-2 with an average of (28.40±6.18) kg·m-2;the courses of disease ranged from 5 to 36 months with an average of (18.20±8.98) months; RSNA system was used to assist the positioning of osteotomy. There were 7 males and 23 females in RA group, aged from 55 to 82 years old with an average of (67.83±8.61) years old;BMI ranged from 19.67 to 37.25 kg·m-2 with an average of (28.01±4.89) kg·m-2; the courses of disease ranged from 3 to 33 months with an average of (17.93±9.20) months;RA was performed. Operation time, incision length, latent blood loss at 2 weeks after operation and incidence of lower extremity thrombosis were compared between two groups. Hip-knee ankle angle (HKAA), HKAA deviation, lateral distal femoral angle ( LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were compared between two groups;Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Society score (KSS) were used to evaluate functional recovery before operation, 3 and 6 months after operation. The operation was performed successfully in both groups, and there were no serious complications such as vascular and nerve injury during operation. The wound healed well at stageⅠafter operation, and the follow-up time was 6 months. The operation time, latent blood loss at 2 weeks after operation and incision length in RSNA group were (94.35±5.75) min, (130.54±17.53) ml and (14.73±2.14) cm, respectively;while (102.57±6.88) min, (146.33±19.47) ml and (16.78±2.32) cm in RA group, respectively. RSNA group was better than RA group (P<0.05). No deep vein thrombosis occurred in both groups at 2 weeks after operation, 5 patients occurred intermuscular vein thrombosisin in RSNA group and 8 patients in RA group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). In RSNA group, HKAA, LDFA and MPTA were (173.00±5.54) °, (86.96±3.45) °, (82.79±3.35) ° before operation, and (178.34±1.85) °, (89.92±0.42) °, (89.84±0.73) ° at 1 week after operation, respectively. In RA group, HKAA, LDFA and MPTA were (173.31±6.48) °, (87.15±3.40) ° and (82.99±3.05) ° before operation, and (178.52±1.79) °, (90.03±0.39) ° and (90.15±0.47) ° at 1 week after operation, respectively. HKAA, LDFA and MPTA were significantly improved in both groups at 1 week after operation (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in HKAA, LDFA, MPTA and PTS between two groups before operation and 1 week after operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in deviation distribution of HKAA at 1 week after operation (χ2=2.611, P=0.456). There were no significant difference in WOMAC and KSS between two groups before operation, 3 and 6 months after operation (P>0.05), and postoperative WOMAC and KSS at 3 and 6 months between two groups were improved compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Both RA and RSNA system assisted TKA could obtain accurate osteotomy, RA has higher surgical accuracy, RSNA system assisted operation has less trauma, and operation is simpler.

Demonstrating the effectiveness of intra-articular prolotherapy combined with peri-articular perineural injection in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-articular prolotherapy (IG) combined with peri-articular perineural injection (PG) in the management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).MethodsA total of 60 patients with the diagnosis of KOA were included in this double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trials. The inclusion criteria were as follow: (1) 48–80 years old; (2) the diagnose of KOA; (3) the grade 2 and 3 of the Kellgern–Lawrence grading scale; (4) the pain, crepitation, and knee joint stiffness continuing for 3 months at least. The main exclusion criteria were as follow: (1) any infection involving the knee skin; (2) history of any Influencing factors of disease. All patients were divided into three groups and received either IG, PG and I + PG under the ultrasound guidance and the 2, 4 and 8 weeks follow-up data of patients were available. (IG n = 20 or PG n = 20, I + PG n = 20). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), The Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the pressure pain threshold (PPT) were used as outcome measures at baseline, 2, 4 and 8 weeks.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in terms of age, sex, BMI, duration of current condition and baseline assessments of pain intensity, WOMAC scores and PPT. After treatment, the improvement of VAS activity, WOMAC and PPT values was showed compared with pre-treatment in all groups (p < 0.05). At 4 and 8 weeks after treatment, the VAS and WOMAC scores of the I + PG were significantly lower than those of the PG or IG, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The PPT values of PG and I + PG were significantly improved compared to IG at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment.ConclusionThe ultrasound guided I + PG of 5% glucose seem to be more effective to alleviate pain and improve knee joint function than single therapy in short term. Clinical rehabilitators could clinically try this combination of I + PG to improve clinical symptoms in patients with KOA.

Considerations beyond spine pain: do different co-occurring lower body joint pains differentially influence physical function and quality of life ratings?

BackgroundPatients seeking medical care for back pain often have coexisting painful joints and the effects of different combinations and number of coexisting pain sites (hip, knee, foot/ankle) to back pain on physical function domains and quality of life rating are not yet established. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in functional outcomes and QOL among individuals with back pain who have concurrent additional pain sites or no pain sites.MethodsData from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort were used for this cross-sectional analysis. Men and women aged 45–79 years with back pain were binned into nine groups by presence or not of coexisting hip, knee, ankle/foot pain and combinations of these sites (N = 1,642). Healthy controls reported no joint pain. Main outcomes included Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS; quality of life and function-sports-and-recreation), Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC; Activities of Daily Living, Pain), Medical Outcomes Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component score, and self-reported function in last 7–30 days (lifting 25-pound objects, housework). 20-m and 400-m walk times and gait speed and repeated chair rise test times were collected.ResultsCompared to back pain alone, pain at all five sites was associated with 39%—86% worse KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 scores (p < .0001). Back-Hip and Back-Knee did not produce worse scores than Back pain alone, but Back-Hip-Knee and Back-Knee-Ankle/Foot did. The 20-m, 400-m walk, and repeated chair times were worse among individuals with pain at all five sites. Additional hip and knee sites to back pain, but not ankle/foot, worsened performance-based walk times and chair rise scores.ConclusionsThe number and type of coexistent lower body musculoskeletal pain among patients with back pain may be associated with perceived and performance-based assessments. Management plans that efficiently simultaneously address back and additional coexistent pain sites may maximize treatment functional benefits, address patient functional goals in life and mitigate disability.

Comparison of Alignment Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes between a CT-Based, Saw Cutting Robotic System and a CT-Free, Jig-guided Robotic System for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The different cutting mode of robot-assisted TKAs may influence the accuracy of alignment. The purpose of this study was to compare alignment accuracy and early clinical outcomes between a CT-based, saw cutting robotic system (MAKO) and a CT-free, jig-guided robotic system (ROSA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 20 MAKO TKAs and 20 ROSA TKAs from June 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Differences in the postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and 3° outlier frequency of the HKA, LDFA, MPTA and PTS were studied at 3 months and 1 year of follow-up. The operative time and total blood loss (TBL) were compared between these two groups. Clinical outcomes at 1 year after surgery, including range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Knee Society Score-2011 (KSS-2011), were also compared between these two groups. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. There were no significant differences in the mean deviations of postoperative HKA, LDFA, MPTA or PTS between the two groups at 3 months or 1 year (all ps > 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the percentage of 3° outliers for HKA, LDFA, MPTA, or PTS between the two groups at 3-month or 1-year follow-up (all ps > 0.05). The mean operation time of MAKO was longer than that of ROSA (112.7 ± 12.8 min vs 94.8 ± 23.0 min, p = 0.001), but the mean TBL (1356.7 ± 648.5 mL vs 1384.5 ± 676.3 mL) and transfusion rate (15.0% vs 5.0%) were not significantly different between the two groups (all ps > 0.05). No significant differences were found in postoperative ROM, WOMAC score or KSS score at 1 year (all ps > 0.05). The MAKO and ROSA had similar accuracy and precision in TKA alignment. The clinical outcomes at 1 year after surgery were also comparable.

Controlled posterior condylar milling technique for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty minimises tibia resection during gap balancing: Short-term clinical results.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the clinical utility of controlled posterior condylar milling (CPCM) in gap balancing while minimally resecting the tibia during fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study is a retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent medial UKA for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the conventional group (n = 56) and the CPCM group (n = 66). In the CPCM group, the proximal tibia was resected at the level of the distal end of the subchondral bone. If the flexion gap was tighter than extension, the posterior condyle was additionally milled to adjust gap tightness. Standing knee X-ray and scanogram were used to evaluate alignment and tibia resection amount. Range of motion (ROM) and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The CPCM group showed significantly smaller tibia resection (3.6 ± 1.9 mm) compared to the conventional group (5.2 ± 2.7 mm) (p < 0.001). Postoperative ROM (133.0 ± 8.3°, 135.2 ± 7.2°, n.s.) and WOMAC (19.3 ± 13.6, 23.6 ± 17.7, n.s.) were not significantly different between the two groups. Postoperative periprosthetic fractures occurred in two patients in conventional group, while the CPCM group had no periprosthetic fractures. The CPCM technique may be a simple and useful intraoperative technique that can achieve minimal tibia resection and promising clinical outcomes while easily adjusting gap tightness between flexion and extension during medial fixed-bearing UKA. Level III.

Primary osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine presenting as chronic low back pain or sciatica or both (prolapsed lumber disc syndrome): establishing its cause, pathogenesis, and treatment: A randomized case-control study

: The objectives of this study were to compare three scores, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low back pain, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Vertical Version at the beginning and end point in two, Trial (G1), and Control (G2) groups of Primary Osteoarthritis of lumbar spine patients.The inner nucleus pulposus may rupture out from the annulus as the disc continues to degrade or as the spine continues to be stressed. This is a herniated or burst disc. The nerve roots that are immediately behind the disc space may then be pressed by the disc material fragments. This may result in discomfort, frailty, numbness, or alterations in feeling.: Understanding the causes, pathophysiology, and treatments for prolapsed lumber disc syndrome, which presents as primary osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine and causes chronic low back pain, sciatica, or both.: In this study, the total number of patients were 150, in G1 - 100, and G2 - 50. G1 received the hypothesized treatment, Contracture Correction Therapy (CCT), while G2 did “No Therapy”. WOMAC determination was done by the questionnaire; ODI by modified Oswestry Low Back pain disability questionnaire and VAS by Visual Analogue Scale Vertical Version, all at 0, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. The CCT consisted of 1. Immobilization of the spine. 2. Passive and active extension of the spine. 3. Three therapeutic rituals and 4. Advice to avoid stooping.: The CCT receiving was associated with much recovery (P &amp;#60;0.00) while non-receiving with much less (P =0.00). In G1 WOMAC decreased from 54.29 to 0.00; ODI from 51.82 to 1.80; VAS rose from 37.56 to 100 (rise indicates betterment) P= 0.00. In G2 WOMAC lowered from 56.40 to 4.08; ODI from 65.10 to 6.0; VAS rose from 34.40 to 81.00. Relief in symptoms was similar.: The cause, pathogenesis, and treatment are deficient full extension, I.V. joint capsule contracture formation, and extension of the lumbar spine respectively.

Two-Stage Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Knee Infections With the Use of Gentamicin-Articulated Spacers: Success Rate and Predictors of Failure at the Minimum Seven-Year Follow-Up.

The purpose of this study was to assess the survivorship rates of 2-stage treatment with gentamicin-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate articulated knee spacer in patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infection and to identify risk factors associated with failure. We conducted a retrospective study among 73 patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee replacement with articulated polymethylmethacrylate gentamicin-impregnated spacers (Subiton, Medical Labs, Ind Argentina), performed in a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 7years. Clinical and functional assessment was performed with Knee Society Score and Western and Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify the variables that influenced the success and failure rates. We included 73 patients. There were 53 (71.3%) monomicrobial, 11 (15%) polymicrobial, and 10 (13.7%) negative cultures infections. The success and failure rates were 90.5% (n= 66) and 9.5% (n= 7), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified that age (odds ratio= 1.77; P= .039), greater erythrocyte sedimentation rate values prior to the first stage (odds ratio= 1.04; P= .006), and polymicrobial infections (odds ratio= 7.32; P= .0003) were independent variables associated with failure. Two-stage revision with polymethylmethacrylate gentamicin-impregnated knee spacers is an effective strategy for the treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty. Age, higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate values prior first stage, and polymicrobial infections were independent risk factors for treatment failure.

The impact of primary patella resurfacing on health-related quality of life outcomes and return to sport in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Primary patella resurfacing (PPR) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a topic without clear clinical evidence. Using Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROM), previous work found TKA patients without PPR to have more pain postoperatively, but little is known whether this may impede patients from returning to their usual leisure sport. This observational study aimed at evaluating the treatment effect of PPR, with PROMs and return to sport (RTS). 156 primary TKA patients were retrospectively included from August 2019 to November 2020, from a single hospital in Germany. PROMs were measured with the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), preoperatively and 1year postoperatively. Leisure sport with three levels of intensity (never, sometimes, regular) were requested. The treatment effect of PPR was evaluated with a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach, with several confounders. Descriptively, the mean WOMAC total score and the mean WOMAC pain score were postoperatively better with PPR, ( - 4.8 points, - 1.1 points), then without PPR. The mean improvements of the WOMAC total score were better with PPR ( - 7.8 points). Mean improvements for the WOMAC pain score were also better with PPR ( - 1.2 points). Mean EQ-VAS were postoperatively similar, and the mean improvements were better with PPR (3.4 points). Rate of RTS was 93% for patients with PPR and 95% for patients without PPR. The DiD revealed minor differences in PROMs and RTS, not to result in statistically significant treatment effects. There was no treatment effect for TKA with PPR, regarding PROMs and RTS, and descriptive differences were below published thresholds for clinical relevance. Rate of RTS was high for all patients, regardless of PPR. For the two endpoint categories, there was no measurable advantage of TKA with PPR over TKA without PPR.

Lateral Retinacular Release During Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in the Presence of Patello-Femoral Joint Arthritis Relieves Patello-Femoral Joint Pressure and Improves Associated Symptoms

BackgroundThis study evaluated the effects of concomitant lateral patellar retinacular release (LPRR) during medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who had patello-femoral joint (PFJ) arthritis who underwent medial UKA with (n = 50) and without (n = 50) LPRR who had ≥2 years follow-up. Radiological parameters associated with lateral retinacular tightness, including patellar tilt angle (PTA), lateral patello-femoral angle (LPFA), and congruence angle, were measured. Functional evaluation was performed using the Knee Society Pain Score, Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Kujala Score, and the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. Intraoperative patello-femoral pressure evaluation was performed on 10 knees to evaluate the pressure changes before and after LPRR. Mann–Whitney U-tests were used for statistical analyses. ResultsDemographic data did not differ between the LPRR(+) and LPRR(−) groups. A decrease in PTA and an increase in LPFA were observed in the LPRR(+) group compared to those in the LPRR(−) group (PTA; −0.54 versus −1.74, P = .002, LPFA; 0.51 versus 2.01, P = .010). The LPRR(+) group showed significantly better KSFS and Kujala scores than the LPRR(−) group (KSFS: 90 versus 80, P = .017; Kujala score: 86 versus 79, P = .009). Intraoperative patello-femoral pressure analysis showed a 22.6% reduction in the PFJ contact pressure and an 18.7% reduction in PFJ peak pressure after LPRR. (P = .0015, P < .0001, respectively) ConclusionA LPRR during UKA may be a simple and useful adjunct procedure to relieve PFJ symptoms with concomitant PFJOA.

Adaptation of the WOMAC for Use in a Patient Preference Study.

To adapt a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), into efficacy attributes for a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey designed to quantify the relative importance of endpoints commonly used in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) trials. The adaptation comprised four steps: (1) selecting domains of interest; (2) determining presentation and framing of selected attributes; (3) determining attribute levels; and (4) developing choice tasks. This process involved input from multiple stakeholders, including regulators, health preference researchers, and patients. Pretesting was conducted to evaluate if patients comprehended the adapted survey attributes and could make trade-offs among them. The WOMAC pain and function domains were selected for adaption to two efficacy attributes. Two versions of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) instrument were created to compare efficacy using (1) total domain scores and (2) item scores for "walking on a flat surface." Both attributes were presented as improvement from baseline scores by levels of 0%, 30%, 50%, and 100%. Twenty-six participants were interviewed in a pretest of the instrument (average age 60years; 58% female; 62% had KOA for ≥ 5years). The participants found both versions of attributes meaningful and relevant for treatment decision-making. They demonstrated willingness and ability to tradeoff improvements in pain and function separately, though many perceived them as inter-related. This study adds to the growing literature regarding adapting PRO measures for patient preference studies. Such adaptation is important for designing a preference study that can incorporate a clinical trial's outcomes with PRO endpoints.

Propensity score-matched study of uni-condylar arthroplasty in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis

To investigate the clinical efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in patients over 75 years old. The clinical efficacy of primary fixed platform UKA in patients with osteoarthritis, was retrospectively analyzed from October 2014 to November 2020. Age, body mass index (BMI), range of motion (ROM), preoperative joint function score, the quality of life score and other preoperative indicators were measured by propensity score matching (PSM). The patients were divided into elderly group (≥75 years old) and control group (<75 years old). Oxford knee score(OKS), Western Ontario McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index(WOMAC), Short Form-12 including physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary(MCS), minimal clinically important difference(MCID ) and clinical complications were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 514 patients were analyzed, 428 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A propensity-score matching study was conducted to eliminate confounding factors. After 1∶2 propensity match, there were 84 patients in elderly group (≥75 years), age ranged from 75 to 88 years old, with an average of (78.79±3.08) years old, and 168 patients in control group (<75 years), age ranged from 47 to 74 years old, with an average of (64.10±5.96)years old. The follow-up duration of two groups ranged from 12 to 84 months with an average of (29.35±16.52) months in elderly group, and 12 to 85 months with an average of (31.83±17.34) months in control group. There was only significant difference in age between the elderly and control groups preoperatively (P<0.01). Postoperatively, the elderly group showed significantly higher WOMAC (P<0.01) and lower SF-12 PCS scores (P<0.01) as compared to the control group. There was no significant difference between the elderly group and the control group in knee range of motion, OKS and the proportion of each scoring system reaching the minimum clinical difference value (P>0.05). In the aspect of preperative complications, the elderly group exhibited more surgical site complications and postoperative delirium compared to control group(P<0.05). The differences in other indicators including deep vein thrombosis, acute urinary retention, cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events and radiolucent lines around prothesis were not statistically significant(P>0.05). UKA in the treatment of elderly patients over 75 years old with knee osteoarthritis was safe and feasible, and could obtain satisfactory short-term efficacy.

Efficacy of Lavage by Tube under Local Anesthesia versus Arthroscopic Treatment of Acute Septic Arthritis of Native Knee.

Although arthroscopic treatment is a minimally invasive surgery that effectively treats septic arthritis of the knee joint, it requires general or regional anesthesia. This study aimed to compare the clinical results of lavage after tube insertion versus arthroscopic treatment. Patients treated with arthroscopic treatment were included in group I (n = 76), while those treated with lavage by tube were included in group II (n = 34). We investigated the following in all patients: demographics, underlying disorders, initial serum white blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, synovial fluid WBC and polymorphonuclear cell counts, causative organism, initial Kellgren-Lawrence grade, lavage number, interventional delay, hospitalization days, CRP normalization time, and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index scores for clinical outcomes at 3 months postoperative. The mean interventional delay was significantly greater in group I (23.6 ± 15.6 h vs. 8.7 ± 9.3 h, p < 0.001). The lavage by tube featured a significantly shorter interventional delay time than arthroscopy, while the CRP decrease rate did not differ between groups. Moreover, lavage by tube showed no significant differences in outcomes, including laboratory results and functional outcomes at 3 months postoperative.

Comparative effectiveness of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder, is associated with an increasing socioeconomic impact owing to the ageing population. To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) and adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) in knee OA management from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Independent and duplicate electronic database searches were performed, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, until August 2021 for RCTs that analyzed the efficacy and safety of AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs in the management of knee OA. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Tegner score, magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score, knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and adverse events were analyzed. Analysis was performed on the R-platform using OpenMeta (Analyst) software. Twenty-one studies, involving 936 patients, were included. Only one study compared the two MSC sources without patient randomization; hence, the results of all included studies from both sources were pooled, and a comparative critical analysis was performed. At six months, both AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs showed significant VAS improvement (P = 0.015, P = 0.012); this was inconsistent at 1 year for BM-MSCs (P < 0.001, P = 0.539), and AD-MSCs outperformed BM-MSCs compared to controls in measures such as WOMAC (P < 0.001, P = 0.541), Lysholm scores (P = 0.006; P = 0.933), and KOOS (P = 0.002; P = 0.012). BM-MSC-related procedures caused significant adverse events (P = 0.003) compared to AD-MSCs (P = 0.673). Adipose tissue is superior to bone marrow because of its safety and consistent efficacy in improving pain and functional outcomes. Future trials are urgently warranted to validate our findings and reach a consensus on the ideal source of MSCs for managing knee OA.

Functional outcomes and length of stay with early and high-intensity rehabilitation after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Length of stay and functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are related to the timing and intensity of post-operative rehabilitation. To determine the effectiveness of early and high-intensity rehabilitation after simultaneous bilateral TKA. Prospective cohort data of 156 patients (11 men and 145 women; average age 72.0 ± 5.6 years) who underwent simultaneous bilateral primary TKA were analyzed. The intervention group (n= 82) underwent a high-intensity rehabilitation (phase II) after early postoperative standard rehabilitation (phase I) between June 2019 and May 2021. The control group (n= 74) underwent a lower-intensity rehabilitation (phase II) after phase I rehabilitation between July 2017 and May 2019. The timed up-and-go (TUG) test, timed stair climbing test (SCT), 6-minute walk test, isometric knee extensor and flexor strength of both knees, knee flexion and extension range of motion, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for pain, stiffness, and functional levels, and the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire were assessed preoperatively and 6 weeks after TKA. The average length of hospital stay was shortened by 5.7 days (p< 0.001). Phase II rehabilitation started earlier in the intervention group than in the control group (7.7 ± 1.3 vs 13.5 ± 2.0, p< 0.001). Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed significant improvements in the measures of mobility (WOMAC-function and SCT) and strength (isometric strength of both knee extensors and flexors) 6 weeks after TKA by statistically controlling for age and preoperative functional status. This study demonstrated that early and high-intensity rehabilitation could achieve functional improvement and shorten the length of hospital stay.

Plantar Neuro-Receptor Activation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

<h3>Research Objectives</h3> Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease of adults worldwide. Despite total knee arthroplasty (TKA) demonstrating high levels of success, 20% of patients report dissatisfaction with their result. VOXX Wellness Stasis Socks are embedded with a proprietary pattern of neuro-receptor activation points that have been proven to activate a precise neuro-response, according to the pattern theory of haptic perception, which stimulates improvements in pain and function. The use of this technology in TKA patients may prove beneficial as an adjunct to recovery as many patients suffer from deficits to their proprioceptive system caused by ligamentous damage and alterations to mechanoreceptors during the procedure. We hypothesized that VOXX Wellness Stasis Socks are a safe, cost-effective and easily scalable strategy to support TKA patients through their recovery. <h3>Design</h3> Double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial. <h3>Setting</h3> Orthopaedic surgical practice. Hospitalized care; outpatient follow up. <h3>Participants</h3> Patients scheduled to receive TKA were considered eligible for inclusion in the trial. 100 patients were enrolled. <h3>Interventions</h3> Intervention group (I): VOXX Wellness Stasis socks containing receptor point-activation technology. Control group (C): VOXX Wellness Stasis socks without receptor point-activation technology. Sock use during the waking hours x 6 weeks. <h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3> Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire completed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks to assess pain, stiffness and physical function. <h3>Results</h3> Data analysis using SPSS software. P-values, effect sizes, and confidence intervals are reported to assess clinical relevance of the finding. Physical status classifications were compared using t-test. Within-subject and between-subject differences in the mean WOMAC were analyzed by ANOVA. Effect size was analyzed using Cramer's V. Consistent improvement in WOMAC scores for pain and stiffness at 2 weeks post op in the Intervention over the Control group. The WOMAC scores assessing physical function showed a consistent improvement at both 2 and 6 weeks post op in the Intervention group compared to Control group. <h3>Conclusions</h3> VOXX proved to be a low cost, safe intervention in TKA to help patients improve with regard to pain, stiffness and physical function. <h3>Author(s) Disclosures</h3> None.

Screening Clinical Changes for the Diagnosis of Early Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Background: The main objective was to evaluate differences in the clinical, motor, or functional variables in patients with Early Osteoarthritis (EOA) and individuals at risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed. All the participants were divided into two groups: EOA patients and healthy subjects (HS) at risk of developing OA. The main outcomes were clinical tests, such as those of knee morphology, instability, or proprioception; motor and functional variables, such as knee strength, range of motion, walking speed, and the sit-to-stand test; pain and disability, assessed through the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scales; and knee alignment and leg length inequality, assessed via X-ray images. Results: A total of 97 participants were included (54 EOA and 43 HS). Patients with EOA showed a greater presence of knee pain (p &lt; 0.01). In addition, more EOA patients showed instability both in the left (p &lt; 0.01) and right legs (p &lt; 0.05). Regarding the knee alignment variable, significant differences were found (p &lt; 0.04), with more patients with EOA diagnosed as possessing a varus alignment. In addition, EOA patients showed lower knee strength, since statistically significant differences were found regarding flexion and extension strength in the left leg (Mean Difference (MD): 12.92; p = 0.03; d = -0.46 and MD:7.81; p = 0.04; d = -0.39). Differences were found for the sit-to-stand test scores, showing lower results for the EOA group (MD: -1.91; p &lt; 0.01; d = 0.54). Conclusions: The results of this research show statistically significant differences between patients with EOA and HS at risk of developing OA with respect to pain, disability, instability, knee strength, and the sit-to-stand test. Our results suggest that the evaluation of clinical, motor, and functional features could contribute to an early management of knee OA.

Does Generalized Joint Laxity Affect Postoperative Alignment and Clinical Outcomes Following Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy?

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether generalized joint laxity affects the postoperative alignment and clinical outcomes of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). MethodsA total of 198 patients who underwent MOWHTO was divided into two groups according to absence or presence of generalized joint laxity. Generalized joint laxity was measured using the Beighton and Horan criteria, and a score of 4 or more out of 9 was defined as generalized joint laxity. A weight bearing line (WBL) ratio of 55% to 70% was considered an acceptable postoperative lower limb alignment range; WBL over 70% was defined as overcorrection and less than 55% as undercorrection. The WBL ratio was investigated before and 2 years after surgery, and the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scale score (WOMAC) was evaluated for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of MOWHTO. There were 147 (73.7%) patients in the nongeneralized joint laxity group and 51 (26.3%) in the generalized joint laxity group. Preoperatively, there was no difference between the two groups in hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle or WBL ratio (all P > .05). ResultsAt 2 years postoperatively, the generalized joint laxity group showed significantly higher HKA angle and WBL ratio than the nongeneralized joint laxity group (all P < .05). There was a significant difference in the distribution ratio of undercorrection, normocorrection, and overcorrection patients between the two groups (P < .05). There were no differences between the two groups in preoperative and postoperative WOMAC scores (all, P > .05). ConclusionThe generalized joint laxity significantly affected postoperative over correction of alignment following MOWHTO. However, there was no significant difference in PRO between the patients who did and did not have generalized joint laxity after MOWHTO until 2 years.

Functional outcome of use of intra articular injection of hyaluronic acid in early osteoarthritis of knee

Aim: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of using intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection to treat early osteoarthritis of the knee joint.Methods: The study included 25 patients with early osteoarthritis ranging from grade 0 to grade 2. Patients were evaluated before and after the procedure using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 1 month and 6 month follow up, respectively.The study group showed clinical improvement and excellent results, as evidenced by their VAS and WOMAC scores at 1 month and 6 month follow-up. In the study groups, no serious adverse effects were observed.Conclusions: Our study determined that hyaluronic acid injection is a safe and effective method in treating early osteoarthritis.